Illinois Supreme Court Coverup For Obamas

[Please see my Update at the bottom of this post!]

The Illinois Supreme Court’s Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) website is engaged in a coverup of Michelle and Barack Obama’s surrendering of their respective law license. Here is how I found out their coverup:
Yesterday I conducted the research for a post, “Barack & Michelle Gave Up Law License,” which I published early this morning. Early this afternoon, when I went onto the same ARDC webpages I had accessed a day ago, I discovered that the ARDC had scrubbed the pages clean.
As recent as yesterday, September 15, 2010, when I searched for “Michelle Obama” on the ARDC website, it directed me to this page (https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=847688734) where I found the information on when Michelle was admitted to the Illinois state bar and that she is no longer authorized to practice law because she had become ”voluntarily inactive.” Here’s a screen-shot of that page from yesterday:

Today, however, when I went on the same page (https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=847688734), it is no longer about Michelle Obama. Instead, the page concerns someone (unnamed), whose date of admission as lawyer by the Illinois Supreme Court was December 30, 1899!!!  
I then went on the ARDC’s lawyer search webpage and searched again for “Michelle Obama.” I was directed to a new page (https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp) that is not the same as the page I looked at only a day ago, yesterday. The information on Michelle on the new page is even briefer:

Name Date Admitted City State Authorized to Practice?
Michelle Obama
Former name(s):
Michelle Robinson

[Note: Copying and pasting the above form somehow left out “May 12, 1989″ under “Date Admitted”, and the word “No” under “Authorized to Practice?”]
Left out of the new page is the information that she is “voluntarily inactive.” 
My friend, Mark S. McGrew, wrote an article for Pravda on Michelle Obama’s law license several months ago. In an e-mail to me today, Mark says when he accessed ARDC’s page on Michelle Obama (the same page, https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=847688734, that I had accessed yesterday), it says about Michelle, “No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.” Here’s a screen shot of the ARDC’s web page on Michelle Obama which Mark saw, which was also what Chelsea Shilling had in her WorldNetDaily article of August 4, 2009:

But when I accessed that page yesterday, the sentence “No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status” had been scrubbed. Today, that page is no longer even about Michelle Obama.
The same scrubbing was also done on Barack Obama.
Yesterday, the URL of the ARDC page on Barack was https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=596550107. Here’s a screen-shot of that page as I saw it yesterday:

Today, that URL is no longer about Barack Obama, but concerns the same unnamed person whose date of admission as lawyer by the Illinois Supreme Court was December 30, 1899.
I then searched for “Barack Obama” and was taken to this page (https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp), with the same minimal information as Michelle’s current page:

Name Date Admitted City State Authorized to Practice?
Barack Hussein Obama December 17, 1991 N/A N/A No

This is not a glitch or malfunction of the ARDC website because, acting upon a suggestion by Mark McGrew, I searched for lawyer “John Q. Fitzpatrick” and was taken to the webpage https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=855203569, which is about John Q. Fitzpatrick instead of some unnamed person who was admitted as lawyer by the Illinois Supreme Court on December 30, 1899.
In other words, only the webpages on Michelle and Barack Obama had been tampered.

All signs point to the Obamas having gotten to the Illinois Supreme Court because this story about their law licenses has gone viral in the last couple of days. So now, the ARDC website has scrubbed away even more information on the Obamas.

It’s a friggin’ conspiracy!
~Eowyn
UPDATE:
Thanks to the patient and gracious commenter “rk”, we now know that the ARDC of the Illinois Supreme Court is not concealing information on Michelle and Barack’s law license status, but the ARDC is, for reasons known only to them, doing their utmost to make finding that information neither simple nor easy.
Upon the recommendation of rk, here’s what I did, which any reader of this can replicate:
Step 1: Go on the ARDC’s “lawyer search” page ( https://www.iardc.org/lawyersearch.asp).
Step 2: Type “Obama” and “Michelle” to search.
Step 3: This brings you to a new page (https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp) with bare-bones info on Michelle O. [Note: Clicking the above URL won’t get you there; you must go through Steps 1 and 2 first.]
Step 4: Click the words in blue: “Michelle Obama”
Step 5: One is now brought to the page on Michelle O (https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=96147597) with all the info that previously appeared to be missing and covered up, including the sentence “No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.”
The same steps 1-5 can be performed to retrieve the ARDC’s info on Barack.
Why is the ARDC website making the retrieval of the information on Michelle and Barack Obama more circuitous and indirect? Just two days ago, when I searched for the Obamas, I was taken DIRECTLY to the Step 5 page, bypassing the intermediary Step 3 page.
This is NOT the behavior of a president who had promised his administration would be the most transparent ever.
~Eowyn (9/18/01)

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
DCG
Guest
DCG

This sounds fishy…yet again The Traitor has somehow covered his paper trail…

tina
Guest

Ya know,I’m so tired of their criminal content. America knows. They actually think one thing reported one day to the next we are gonna forget. They make me sick. I heard initially Michele lost her license for “Patient Dumping” which wouldn’t surprise me at all. They are criminal,corrupt and need to be ARRESTED. ILLEGAL AS HELL.

Doc's Wife
Guest
Doc's Wife

Sometimes I just shake my head and wonder just how all this is going to end up. Every day brings some new shockers about these two imposters in our great White House.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

So much for “transparency”…

Joan
Editor
Joan

Eowyn, this is an extremely disturbing cover-up you discovered! And, you did so innocently, proving to everyone what the posts said previously, and what they say now! There is so much that we do not know, and so much evil going on here that this is unfathomable! God bless you for your courage, wisdom, insight and skill in telling us about this!

rk
Guest
rk

I don’t know about a coverup, but I went to the ADRC website and searched for each and got the original information contained in the screenshots. book marking a search page on the servers will give a default page or a fictitious page because the servers change the address with each search. Try the ADRC Lawyer search from their home page instead of a wonky link. while there, check out the definitions under the “change of status” link. It should give the same info which appeared to have been missing or changed. Even though this seems to be a misunderstanding… Read more »

Judy
Guest

Simply wanted to say thank you, Eowyn and rk, for the education, on law licenses (I had no idea) but more particularly, in perseverance, patience, and class. So often disagreements deteriorate to mudslinging, but you both rose above. I don’t suppose you could give lessons to some of our politicians?

george
Guest
george

ya know we all have the same feelings here and i guess the best way to handle everything coming down the road that he has instore for us is
“LOCK AND LOAD” after all even he can do one thing good for this country and he did! barry has worked for FREE and been the best salesman for the GUN INDUSTRY!!! we appreciate his dedication and all of his volunteer work to help ARM americans and also get the beginners going.
thanks aka obama!

Alma
Guest
Alma

You all need to read the book, “The Roots of Obama’s Rage” by Dinesh D’Souza. It is a true eye opener on what Obama wants to do to this country.

Meshuga mikey
Guest
Meshuga mikey

The data on Michelle appears to be intact.
https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=464937270

Please don't vote for Obama!
Guest
Please don't vote for Obama!

The explanation for your findings is that, at that time, when a lawyer applied for inactive status (which is what Michelle did) then the court was obliged to follow up with a court order in order to inactivate. The policy has changed since, and no longer requires a court order to voluntarily inactivate.
With gas prices the climbing astronomically, you would be better-served to investigate the moritoriums against gulf shore drilling and the permit denials for drilling and infrustructure in Alaska…all perpetrated by the Obama administration. THAT subject really has some teeth!

john hayward
Guest
john hayward

Yes, the court was “obliged” to make a court order to inactivate, you are barking up the wrong tree here go after the pipeline or gulf drilling permits.

Geary
Guest
Geary

In 1935, J. Edgar Hoover said, “It is no coincidence that all criminals come out of Chicago.”

Sidney Harmeson
Guest

STRANGE webpages,first attempt to search gave me a result of “search does not match criteria” second search reported “illegal operation” third search attempt reported the Obamas are inactive,1991 and 1989……so confusing I believe something is being covered up but being Canadian I just don’t understand the “whats” and “whys”. Thank you for you posts! may God bless us all! Amen.

Firefly
Guest
Firefly

I’ve done the search several times and never came up with the original data as described…only the data you show as “scrubbed”. But the URL is different than any of the ones listed too: https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=948482368

Diane Webb
Guest
Diane Webb

I want to cry every time I see Obama’s face and hear his voice…I know is not an American citizen and he is trying (doing) everything in his power (or out) of his constitutional power to destroy our country. What he did when the basic premis of the Arizona immigration law was upheld was no different than the abuses of King George listed in the D of I. “…he has declared us out of his protection and is waging cruel war upon us…” This man is worse than a king and has done more damage than any president before. I… Read more »

Yvonne Anderson
Guest

My concern over all of this clouded “illegal” record of Obama is that much of it, as well as other things that the dem’s have done, is obviously a breach of our laws and our constitution. So when an elected president does such a thing (specifically ordering things that Congress has not voted on), how do we bring him to trial? What venue do we the people have to state our charges or for even the senators or respresentatives to do so? I don’t see any. Once the president, whoever he is, is in office, he controls the Justice department,… Read more »

Dolly
Guest

why would such a major issue be avoided during the political campaigns this crook was successful in? what is going on? why isn’t this being covered on tv? this guy and his wife are both unfit to be in the bar association, but they live in the White House and have access to Top Secret information….hmmm

T. J.
Guest

12/30/1899 is the “base date” for access; also known as Date Zero; the date when information was transferred to electronic book-entry; said date has to do with the bankruptcy of the States, United.

T. J.
Guest

Additional information about the date of 12/30/1899 may be found here: https://calhounomics.org/2014/11/03/disability-disappearance-or-death-of-personal-representative/

James
Guest
James

It doesn’t show, “court ordered” portion of sentence anymore. Just checked it today.