Netflix twists ‘Anne of Green Gables’ into a queer soirée with 5 LGBT characters

If anyone still needs a reason to dump Netflix, here it is.

Moira Walley-Beckett, a screen writer whose loafers obviously don’t touch the ground, has created a new Netflix series titled “Anne With an E,” based upon Lucy Maud Montgomery’s immensely popular 1908 novel Anne of Green Gables. But the new Netflix series takes a bizarre and twisted turn.

The new series is produced by Northwood Entertainment.

Critic Mark Martin, writing for the entertainment section of the Christian Broadcasting Network July 21, said the Netflix adaptation of Montgomery’s novel has been revised to include multiple homosexual characters. As an example, the beloved character Great Aunt Josephine Barry is now a grouchy lesbian.

“Upon reading (the novel) again as an adult, I was wondering about Aunt Jo,” Walley-Beckett told IndieWire. “In the book, she’s a spinster, and she’s just a bit of a curmudgeon, and that’s kind of it. So I’m like, ‘Well, she’s coming to the Barrys for a month and she’s grieving;’ that’s why I decided to justify why she’s there: Who is she grieving?”

Aunt Jo revealed in Season 1 that she was grieving over the loss of a character known as Aunt Gertrude, Aunt Jo’s partner.

IndieWire reports their relationship is what’s called a “Boston marriage,” when two women live together without being supported financially by a man. But the term didn’t exist during the time period of the novel.

Walley-Beckett said, “And so we touch on that in Season 1, and in Season 2 we get to expand upon it in a way that allows her to provide a forum of acceptance.”

That “forum of acceptance” is known as a “queer soirée.” In Season 2, Aunt Jo holds her first queer soirée since the passing of her partner.

“It was very exciting for me and the writers to create that,” Walley-Beckett continued. “We’ve been talking about the queer soirée, which is how we refer to it, since we all first sat down together.”

IndieWire goes on to say that one of the artists attending the soirée is the show’s creation of the real-life pianist and composer, Cécile Chaminade.

“Cécile Chaminade is really torn from the pages of history. We didn’t invent anything about her really,” said Walley-Beckett. “She was a feminist and a gay icon and a composer, and she travels the world playing piano. So that’s how Jo would know her.”

The new Netflix series also features two homosexual male characters. One is Anne’s good friend, “Cole.”

“It would only make sense that there would be somebody in the class who was struggling with identity,” Walley-Beckett claims. “I was very keen to include a storyline like that.”

And it doesn’t end there. The children’s teacher, Mr. Phillips, is also gay.

“Also, in my mind, their teacher Mr. Phillips has always been an unidentified closeted homosexual,” Walley-Beckett said. “He just has no idea that he was.”

Walley-Beckett said there is an opposing view in the series through the character of “Diana.”

“It is very difficult for Diana confronted with this sudden circumstance about her two aunts, basically,” she said. “I felt like to balance things, it was great to have the kids have a conversation about it, and have conflicting points of view because those are the points of views that are within the families who are watching the show.”

“I am just so proud to be a part of something that can offer this to people, and I hope to all the kids, too, who are struggling with their gender (and sexual) identity, who may not have the empathy or understanding around them that they need,” she said.

Tess Farrand, a contributing writer for Movieguide: The Family Guide to Movies and Entertainment, spoke out against all the prominent homosexual story lines depicted in “Anne With an E”:

“The creators of the series have carefully manipulated the classic story with an agenda that fits their worldview. ANNE WITH AN E’s attempt to also push LGBT in programming that would normally attract more faith-based audiences is utterly unnecessary.

“Moreover, focusing attention on the sexuality subplot of the series detracts from the moral redemptive nature of the story. Obviously, the minds behind the series are jumping onto the ideological bandwagon that already has concerned parents even more worried.

“The discussion of gender and sexuality are in fact discussed ad nauseam. People in 2018 don’t need or want to see political/social debates take place on ‘family’ TV shows; they see enough of it on social media or see it on the 5 ‘o clock news.

“Rather, we should be turning to the ultimate resource for clarification on these pressing topics: the Bible.”

Farrand encourages audiences to know the “power” they have to make changes in the entertainment industry.

“Audiences need to recognize the power of their part in the industry,” she wrote. “We can say no to entertainment choices, and we can pray that the individuals that make up the industry would be shaped by God’s Word, which has the power to transform and renew everyone.”

See also:

Grif

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

7
Leave a Reply

avatar
7 Comment authors
Esther Bunny BrownRumpled NixonLophattRobertCraig M Thomas Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Vistabee
Member
Vistabee

(I tried to give this an ‘excellent ‘ vote, but doesn’t look like it counted…)
That said- about a year ago (I think) I watched the first installment of ‘Anne with an E’ and found it disturbing- can’t really explain why- but never watched any further episodes. How dare people take a story and ‘expound ‘ on it! Write your own darn story!

Stacey Lynn
Guest
Stacey Lynn

I first watched “Anne of Green Gables” with Megan Follows, on a Sunday which turned into an unplanned family day, as I watched it with my parents & sister. It was one of those great memories you have from childhood. After watching the long, but wonderful movie, we stayed put for the sequel. I hadn’t yet read the books, rather, i just found it by accident & it just sort of appealed to all of us. It was a very innocent story. When I saw they had a new version called “Anne with an E,” I was thrilled, hoping a… Read more »

Robert
Guest
Robert

Well said, Stacey. It is only going to get worse–revisionists’ agenda with the truncating; eviscerating, and dehumanising children and teens novels and stories. Censorship is about control. A form of communist-era reeducation has been slowly creeping up in the USA’s school curricula; tv shows, books, plays, poetry, tv, movies, and music. Much of it is like an inverse of the old morality plays of the pre and medieval period. We are in deep trouble, culturally, creatively and our society is clearly under attack. If the good men and women of the USA, Europe, Canada, etc do not block the revisionism… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

I would agree with most of that. I think we need to understand that these “revisionists” really think they can “create reality” simply by writing a new script. The one point I’d make with the analysis (it was a good one), is that people aren’t all that different just because a little time has elapsed. People were not as “ignorant” of sex (even perverse sex), as many would like to think. They didn’t discuss it openly. In the case of children, adults would step in and make the “problem” go away. There certainly were every variety of depravity we have… Read more »

Craig M Thomas
Guest
Craig M Thomas

Just another in the sea of reasons to drop Netflix. The deal with the Obama’s did it for me.

Rumpled Nixon
Guest
Rumpled Nixon

More LGBT pedophilia propaganda. Normalizing sex with children in all media. Netflix should be shut down for creating and distributing child porn.

Esther Bunny Brown
Guest

That adaptation reminds me of the following excerpt:

“The arbitrary adaptation of Journey to the West even has Sun Wukong put his arms around and fall in love with the demons that he instead vanquished in the classic novel.” – How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World, Chapter Fourteen: Popular Culture–A Decadent Indulgence (https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-fourteen-popular-culture-a-decadent-indulgence_2685394.html)