TSA Scanners Ineffective Against Terrorists

Rate this post

Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:46:57 +0000

eowyn2

I have a logical puzzle — a series of propositions — for you to solve:

  1. The government installs a machine and forcibly subjects citizens to the machine.
  2. The machine is highly invasive of privacy because it takes X-ray-like images of our bodies, exposing the outlines of breasts and genitalia.
  3. There is scientific evidence that the machine is harmful to our health: it blasts cancer-inducing radiation into our bodies; it destroys our DNA.
  4. Despite 2 and 3, the government insists the machine is necessary because it will prevent a terrible scourge, X.
  5. But we have evidence that X can easily fool the machine.
  6. So, what exactly is the government’s purpose for the machine?

Cheers!

~Eowyn

The final solution

TSA X-Ray Machines Easily Fooled, Researchers Find

FoxNews.com – Dec 14, 2010

Any would-be terrorist can easily outsmart the ubiquitous backscatter scanners found in major airports around the world, two scientists say.

The Transportation Security Administration‘s X-ray backscatter scanners have been the center of a widespread controversy, following concerns from privacy advocates that they take nearly naked photos of people. The trade-off is improved security, of course. Yet Leon Kaufman and Joseph W. Carlson, two physics professors at the University of California, San Francisco offer a stark conclusion: They can be easily duped, according to a recent paper published in the Journal of Transportation Security.

“It is very likely that a large (15–20 cm in diameter), irregularly-shaped, cm-thick pancake with beveled edges, taped to the abdomen, would be invisible to this technology — ironically because of its large volume, since it is easily confused with normal anatomy,” the researchers said in the paper. Kaufman and Carlson conclude that some types of foreign objects can be reliable detected only if they are packed outside the sides of the body, and some well hidden items would be impossible to see even with the scanner. 

“It is also easy to see that an object such as a wire or a box-cutter blade, taped to the side of the body, or even a small gun in the same location, will be invisible,” the paper notes.

Experts have already highlighted that such machines are unable to detect hidden plastic explosives…. Because of the inherent detection methods, raising the level of X-ray exposure and thus the picture clarity wouldn’t help. “Even if exposure were to be increased significantly, normal anatomy would make a dangerous amount of plastic explosive with tapered edges difficult if not impossible to detect.”

The TSA maintains that the machines remain an integral part of their security arsenal, telling FoxNews.com that it trusts the controversial machines. “Advanced imaging technology is a proven, highly-effective tool that safely detects both metallic and non-metallic items concealed on the body that could be used to threaten the security of airplanes,” a TSA spokesman told FoxNews.com.

The report will nevertheless leave many critics wondering if the machines are worth the hassle with many already opposed to their use because of privacy and safety concerns. The ACLU has dubbed the scan a “virtual strip search” as it gives clear view of the person’s genitalia. These privacy considerations came to the forefront of the conversation last month when online tech site Gizmodo leaked 100 TSA scans to the public.

The TSA stresses that backscatter scanners are merely one tool in the arsenal, however, and just one front in the war on terror. “TSA employs many layers of security that work collaboratively to form a system that gives us the best chance to detect and disrupt the evolving threats we face,” the spokesman said.

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *