Hillary Clinton uses Sandy Hook false flag to push for gun control

As predicted, in her acceptance speech last night at the Democratic National Convention, gun control is Hillary Clinton’s solution for the violence in our streets.
And as predicted, she made use of the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting massacre that took the lives of 20 little children, to manipulate Americans who feel instead of think.
Hitler children gun control
In her acceptance speech, Hillary said, referring to Donald Trump’s endorsement by the National Rifle Association (NRA), “And if we’re serious about keeping our country safe, we also can’t afford to have a President who’s in the pocket of the gun lobby.”
To tug at the heartstrings of gullible Americans, Hillary said:

“For decades, people have said this issue was too hard to solve and the politics were too hot to touch. But I ask you: how can we just stand by and do nothing? You heard, you saw, family members of people killed by gun violence.

By “family members of people killed by gun violence,” Hillary was referring to Erica Lafferty Smegielski, who was one of the speakers at the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday, July 27.

Erica Smegielski & Hillary Clinton (Getty Image)

Erica Smegielski & Hillary Clinton (Getty Image)


Smegielski is the daughter of slain Sandy Hook Elementary School principal Dawn Hochsprung who, we are told, was the first to be killed by Adam Lanza. Curiously, the dead Hochsprung managed to give an interview about the massacre to Newtown’s local newspaper, Newtown Bee. More curious still is the fact that the cache date of the Bee article featuring Hochsprung’s interview was December 13, a day before the massacre. See:

As recounted by Ricky Campbell for Heavy, July 27, 2016:

Erica Smegielski, the daughter of slain Sandy Hook Elementary School principal Dawn Hochsprung, is joining the likes of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Connecticut Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy Wednesday at the 2016 Democratic National Convention to tell her story, along with encouraging voters to support nominee Hillary Clinton and her stance on expanding gun control nationwide.
Smegielski, dedicated to closing gun law loopholes, has appeared in a Clinton ad called “My Mom,” where she says “no more families should have to go through what we have. Hillary Clinton is the only candidate that has what it takes to take on the gun lobby.

According to Heavy, Hillary “has put in a lot of effort this campaign to publicly talk with Sandy Hook families and discuss expanding gun control.”
In that “effort,” Hillary is aided by her willing accomplices in the media, notably CNN who, 3 days before the Democratic National Convention began, in the space of just one hour, obligingly flooded YouTube with one hundred Sandy Hook videos.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmmDuIgqFOQ]
This is the same CNN whose live footage on the day of the Sandy Hook massacre inexplicably shows police and first responders running into an entirely different school than the supposed crime scene, Sandy Hook Elementary School. (See “CNN deception: Live aerial footage of police running into Sandy Hook was of another school“)
Back to Hillary’s acceptance speech last night.
Speaking out of both sides of her mouths, Hillary said:

I’m not here to repeal the 2nd Amendment. I’m not here to take away your guns. I just don’t want you to be shot by someone who shouldn’t have a gun in the first place.
We should be working with responsible gun owners to pass common-sense reforms and keep guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorists and all others who would do us harm.”

But the fact is we already have policies in place which are designed to “keep guns out of the hands of criminals”. It’s called background checks. So what other “common-sense reforms” that would “keep guns out of the hands of criminals” is Hillary proposing — reforms that she claims would not “repeal the 2nd Amendment” by further eroding the gun rights of law-abiding Americans?
Her campaign website affords a better idea of what those “common-sense reforms” means. It promises that “As president, Hillary will” do the following:

  • “Expand background checks to more gun sales—including by closing the gun show and internet sales loopholes—and strengthen the background check system by getting rid of the so-called “Charleston Loophole.”
  • Take on the gun lobby by removing the industry’s sweeping legal protection for illegal and irresponsible actions (which makes it almost impossible for people to hold them accountable), and revoking licenses from dealers who break the law.
  • Keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, other violent criminals, and the severely mentally ill by supporting laws that stop domestic abusers from buying and owning guns, making it a federal crime for someone to intentionally buy a gun for a person prohibited from owning one, and closing the loopholes that allow people suffering from severe mental illness to purchase and own guns. She will also support work to keep military-style weapons off our streets.”

Note that none of Hillary’s proposed gun reforms listed above would have prevented the Sandy Hook or the recent Orlando gay-club massacre because:

  1. The alleged lone shooter Adam Lanza’s guns were his mother’s, and Nancy Lanza obtained the guns legally by satisfying all background checks.
  2. The alleged lone shooter of Orlando, Omar Mateen, also obtained his guns legally. In fact, Mateen was an employee of G4S, a huge security firm with a multimillion dollar contract with the Department of Homeland Security to, ironically, identify suspected terrorists.
  3. Neither Lanza nor Mateen was a “domestic abuser,” had a criminal record (violent or not), or “severely mentally ill”.

So why then would Hillary use Sandy Hook to advocate for her proposed gun reforms that would not have prevented the massacre in the first place?
It doesn’t make sense. And, to quote Judge Judy, “If it doesn’t make sense, it isn’t true.”
Please don’t fall for Hillary’s ruse.
The Alternative Media have conducted diligent and exhaustive research on Sandy Hook, showing it was an elaborate false-flag to promote gun control. For exercising their First Amendment right of free speech, the researchers have endured online harassment, abuse, and death threats. Some paid an especially heavy price: film-maker William Shanley was arrested and imprisoned; tenured professor, Dr. James Tracy, was fired by Florida Atlantic University. (See “Sandy Hook: The hounding of Prof. James Tracy”)
For all the posts Fellowship of the Minds has published on this false flag, please go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page. See especially:

For the Orlando false-flag, please see our “Orlando Gay-Club Massacre” page, especially:

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

28
Leave a Reply

avatar
10 Comment authors
Wolfgang Halbig has stunning evidence that Sandy Hook Elementary School was closed months before 'massacre' - Fellowship Of The MindsWolfgang Halbig Presents Stunning Evidence That Sandy Hook School Was Closed Months Before ‘Massacre’ – Truther's WorldFull Video: Wolfgang Halbig has stunning evidence that Sandy Hook Elementary School was closed months before ‘massacre’ – Examining The Reality We've Been Soldlophattgreenworxx Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Gearbox
Guest
Gearbox

Excellent, as always Dr. Eowyn. My comment, for what it is worth is if one goes to the store and buys an item and takes it home and puts it on the shelf, they fully plan on using it at a chosen time – that’s why they bought it. The forces behind Clinton and her ilk, purchased Sandy Hook, and other False Flag Events to be used at a time chosen by the purchaser. This is all part of a big plan, paid for by those with the money and an agenda. We are viewed as cattle by them to… Read more »

weezy
Guest
weezy

What the democrat liberals do is take small bites at a time. In the end they will have planned total gun confiscation. Bit by bit.

trackback

[…] Hillary Clinton uses Sandy Hook false flag to push for gun control […]

josephbc69
Guest

Broom Hilda: the hebefrenic sociopath at “its highest and best!” A recent article [https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/288669.php] clearly explains her: ” Dr. Nigel Blackwood, co-author of the study, explains that psychopathic offenders are different from regular criminals in a variety of ways. While regular criminals respond to threat swiftly and are quick-tempered and aggressive, psychopaths have a low response level to threats, act cold[ly, sic] and their aggression is premeditated. “Evidence is now accumulating to show that both types of offenders present abnormal, but distinctive, brain development from a young age,” he adds. We know from her public history that she’s been this… Read more »

truckjunkie
Guest
truckjunkie

Dare we hope Trump will revoke the unconstitutional EO’s and put some effort into enforcing the Second Amendment as it was INTENDED when it was written? Our entire problem with our 2nd Amendment right is that the Fed.Gov. has taken it upon itself to infer that our Rights need “common-sense reforms” ADDED to the accepted meaning of “shall not be infringed”. She can’t have it both ways-either we have our Right AS WRITTEN,or we don’t. She chooses to take our Right from us in an illegal,unethical,unconstitutional manner,just like Obama has done. ANY GUN CONTROL AT ALL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Granted,the Constitutional… Read more »

Cinderella Broom
Editor

Reblogged. Great work as usual.

marblenecltr
Guest

I couldn’t take much of the closing theatrical propaganda spectacle, the DNC lack of reality show, a Hollywood production that, using Morgan Freeman, presented Hillary Clinton as a combination of Mother Theresa and Wonder Woman. An Amazon River of lies that no fact finder could get through in a month. And there was an audience that will never accept the reality anyhow. An award winning production in many categories, including music, script, and memorization and uttering of script (or teleprompter reading.)
Must reads for reality: ,”Armageddon,” Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, and “Hillary’s America,” Dinesh D’Souza.

marblenecltr
Guest

Reblogged this on necltr and commented:
Faux crisis actors needed only for cameo or walk-on; the stars are coming out tonight.

truckjunkie
Guest
truckjunkie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6ebMME6TNk
SO-they’re so desperate for butts to fill the seats they “Reserved” all the empty seats for their $50.00/day Rent-a-Crats. That’s just funny right there…..

1EarthUnited
Guest

Reblogged this on 1EarthUnited.

josephbc69
Guest

This ‘event’ is so completely irrelevant, ignorant, and deliberately deceitful that it staggers all human comprehension as to why it is even staged.
Do its makers really believe anyone above age nine will be taken in by it? If so then humans are beyond redemption: we passed our expiry date many years ago!

greenworxx
Guest
greenworxx

Now that we have documented proof Party officials and the conventions they run are completely corrupt, it would be refreshing not to have to go through this sham every four years. The indecent amounts of money wasted to make the populace think their primary votes are meaningful is shameful and sickening. There has to be a better way. Much of America has finally had enough abuse from our so called leaders and they’ve woken up to what’s really going on in this country and the world. I don’t think the citizenry will allow Party officials to “elect” the nominees ever… Read more »

truckjunkie
Guest
truckjunkie

Why do the Candidates think they gain credibility by insulting each other? Isn’t the purpose of Campaigning SUPPOSED to be to tell the Voters what YOU can do for the Country,what YOU can bring to the table? How many Candidates have their names seen in the Voting Booths without the Voters knowing anything about them except that they despise their opponent? I wish we could end the cross-line tattling and insulting,and just have the Candidates talk to the People about what they can do to make the US,and OUR lives,better during their Terms. Maybe there needs to be an “Ethics… Read more »

truckjunkie
Guest
truckjunkie

I’m not arguing that point about the “quality” of behavior;it just seems to me that Candidates need a bit more “incentive” to stay on point and do what they’re there for,and that ISN’T to entertain the low information voters. Maybe a review board,and possible suspension from Candidacy if a foul is called would keep them focused on their “Job”.

trackback

[…] Hillary Clinton uses Sandy Hook false flag to push for gun control […]

trackback

[…] Hillary Clinton uses Sandy Hook false flag to push for gun control […]

trackback

[…] Hillary Clinton uses Sandy Hook false flag to push for gun control […]