Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email

Julian Assange’s WikiLeaks‘ streaming release of the hacked Hillary Clinton emails is a gift that keeps on giving.

The latest is a very strange email from one of Hillary’s State Department Foreign Service officers named W. Lewis Amselem, in which he, jokingly or not, made mention of “sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch” — a demon to whom child sacrifices are offered. (Amselem is a Sephardic Jewish surname.)

Note: In the Old Testament, Gehenna was a valley by Jerusalem, where apostate Israelites and followers of various pagan gods sacrificed their children by fire (2 Chr. 28:3, 33:6; Jer. 7:31, 19:2–6). One of those gods was Moloch (aka Molech, Molekh, Molok, Molek, Molock, Moloc, Melech, Milcom or Molcom), an ancient Ammonite god who demanded a particular kind of propitiatory child sacrifice from parents.

W. Lewis Amselem is now a retired senior U.S. Foreign Service officer. In 2009 when he wrote that email, Amselem was the head of the U.S. delegation to the Organization of American States (OAS). It is said that Amselem had concealed the identities of individuals, one of whom was a U.S. national, who in 1989 kidnapped, tortured and raped Diana Ortiz, an American nun in Guatemala.
Amselem’s email was forwarded by Cheryl D. Mills to Hillary Clinton.

Cheryl Mills was Hillary’s chief of staff throughout Hillary’s 4 years as secretary of state. In June 2016, Mills was deposed as part of the discovery granted to Judicial Watch by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in response to JW’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unsecured, non-government email system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363).

Below is a screenshot I took of the WikiLeaks email (you can see the email for yourself here). The email from Amselem with the reference to animal sacrifice to Moloch is at the end of a series of forwarded email exchanges. (I painted a red bracket around the animal sacrifice phrase.)


See also:

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
99 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Auntie Lulu
Auntie Lulu
4 years ago

Why would people even joke about stuff like that, as humans it is beneath our dignity in doing so. Going back in time, there were tens of thousands of children who were sacrificed thusly. Hardly a joking matter. It just goes to show that liberalism really is mental illness.

chemtrailssuck
4 years ago
Reply to  Auntie Lulu

These NWO crazies are drunk with power. But, I wonder if they really know how pathetic they really look? A chicken? How lame. The guy doesn’t realize that once sattan has no use for you, he throws you away.

Pedo Esta
Pedo Esta
2 years ago
Reply to  chemtrailssuck

A Chicken is a longtime code word for Little Boy. Chicken = little boy. Sacrificed a little boy to Moloch. Vote democrat so we can rape and slaughter millions Bolshivic style. Hillary love to eat the genitals off of adrenilized wailing chickens.

chemtrailssuck
2 years ago
Reply to  Pedo Esta

Ah…it makes sense now, thank you P.E.
This is why they don’t let the real news out. Like H.W. Bush said, we’d all chase them down the street and hang ’em high if we knew all the depraved things they were involved with.

joandarc
joandarc
4 years ago
Reply to  Auntie Lulu

Frankly, why would anyone even know about the demon, moloch, unless he was extremely familiar with the occult and names of demons. He must be familiar with the devil and his demons.

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  joandarc

Well, that “could” be a matter of context. Certainly, THIS BUNCH, in this situation, would have no need of that. The Church actually knows quite a lot (maybe more than anyone else) about “demonology”. I find it fascinating. Having said that, there are MULTIPLE caveats that go with that. No one should “dabble” in this that doesn’t have a legitimate reason and and adequate training. While Christians have nothing to fear from the evil forces unless they invite them, invitations are not always that easy to understand. Nobody in the Church suggests that people should “play” with this or make… Read more »

Bones23
Bones23
13 days ago
Reply to  Auntie Lulu

She was not joking

TrailDust
Admin
4 years ago

Although it seems intended as humor, I can’t be at ease with a guy who can make that joke. Very troubling stuff. Thank you for making it public on FOTM, Dr. Eowyn.

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago

Yes, at the time (1989) they were deeply involved in Latin American destabilization. Of course, that was blamed on a “conservative” U.S. policy. This should go some way to dispelling the myth that there is a shred of difference between either titular political party. They were very busy facilitating the murder of priests and nuns who were involved with a socialist experiment called “Liberation Theology”. Basically, it was a land redistribution scheme. TPTB were fascist and not keen on contributing to the peasant’s welfare. One has to understand that, regardless of what “party” claims power, neither of them cares one… Read more »

trackback

[…] via Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email — Fellowship of the M… […]

Lana
Lana
4 years ago

I’m taking it that this is not a joke. After all, ordinary Orthodox Jews have no problem abusing and killing chickens to for other rituals seen here in all it’s disgusting barbarity… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpEsbOXdrdQ
Couple that with Larry Nicholson’s assertion that Bill told him that Hitlery flew to California each month to participate in some kind of witchcraft ritual
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aU8mcFeT3Uk
and the fact that Hitlery is more than likely a Crypto Jew herself..
https://henrymakow.com/2016/03/is-hillary-clinton-a-crypto.html

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago

At the risk of being misunderstood, my take goes something like this: We all have a fundamental choice to make. Those who are Christian should know that, those who are not are at a “disadvantage”. In order to commit a mortal sin, one must understand that one is doing that and choose to do it anyway. So, depending on whether one subscribes to the psychological model and says she is a psychopath or the religious model, and says she is possessed, may determine whether her behavior is “willful” or not. I have no problem seeing her either way. I, of… Read more »

Steven Broiles
4 years ago

I have read elsewhere that Hillary Clinton is Jewish, that she is a Crypto-Jew. That being said, I also know that some Jews do a ritual with a live chicken, in which they swing a live chicken around their heads in a circular fashion, thus transferring their moral guilt to the bird. That being said, it sure seems to me that this woman is not a believer; or, if she believes at all, that her “god” is LUCIFER. And if what I have read recently is true, a very large chunk of the Washington Establishment is involved in the Clinton… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Steven Broiles

Steven, that’s a good explanation about the chicken. I guess you could say that they’re a “carefree lot”. As the Freemasons say “the Jewes are the ones who will not be blamed for anything”. That message was scrawled in blood at the scene of one of Jack the Rippers victim’s. It is true that “faith” is difficult for many. That was one of the side lures of “science”. In reality they don’t have to be at odds. Faith at least delivers on its promises. People are selfish. If they choose to revel in their selfishness they become of this world.… Read more »

Steven Broiles
4 years ago
Reply to  lophatt

Lophatt: About two or three years ago, Dr. Makow ran a post, in which his source(s) identify Jack the Ripper as Winston Churchill’s father or grandfather.

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Steven Broiles

Hmmm? I haven’t heard that one. I’ve heard others. There is one that has Prince Edward and his illegitimate child with a prostitute causing the Queen to send her physician after her. I can’t remember his name at the moment. It’s plausible. There’s another that has a crazy American. That has a lot of anecdotal evidence as well. For me the Masonic references were interesting. It was clearly done by someone who knew the rituals. Clues were also left so that the police, who were heavily into Freemasonry, would recognize the work of brother masons. So, whoever “Jack” was, he… Read more »

Dr. Watson
Dr. Watson
4 years ago
Reply to  lophatt

“the Jewes are the ones who will not be blamed for anything”. It’s years since I last saw a film called ‘Murder by Decree’, starring Christopher Plummer as Sherlock Holmes ‘investigating’ the Ripper murders. The quote above was used. BUT – I’m certain it was along the lines of “the Jewes are not the ones who will be blamed for nothing”. It was deduced by Holmes (yes, I know, I’m just passing on info) that “Jewes” did NOT refer to Jews. It referred to the Masons. Namely, three ‘gods’ that they allegedly worship – Jahbulon (iirc) & 2 others I… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Watson

It is a double-entendre. The word “Jewes” comes from the Masonic initiation ceremony. In this case there are “three ruffians”, Jubilo, jubil (I can’t remember, but you get the idea), collectively known as “The Jewes”. Also associated with the ceremony are the “penalties” for divulging the ceremony. They list gruesome tortures such as disembowelment, etc.. The “Jack the Ripper” murders are thought to emulate those. As far as my quote goes, I’m doing it from memory so I could be wrong. What difference does it make? The point I was attempting to make is that these various groups have common… Read more »

Anonymous
Anonymous
4 years ago
Reply to  Steven Broiles

Some of the ultra-orthodox Hasidim can be a bit strange (if not OCD)… most orthodox Jews even don’t get like that, so take it for what you will.

Kay
Kay
4 years ago

I doubt the “chicken” is the kind that has feathers and clucks.

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

I’m not aware of that usage. I’ve always thought of “chicken hawk” as being someone with no military service who’s always pushing for war. I’ll take your word for the other meaning. I doubt, however, that it is what he was discussing in the email. Steven’s reference is true. They do that as sort of a “sin offering”. Very primitive. Like the “Judas Goat”. Preying on young boys, however, is a shared pass time for them. It sort of “binds” them together in sinful behavior. That’s part of the mystique of lying in a coffin while other men masturbate on… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

I didn’t say I didn’t believe you. I just said I hadn’t heard it used that way before. I don’t get out much.

Jack
Jack
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

Actually, while the catholic church seems to lead the pack on the matter of priestly pedophilia, there is quite a lot of information available to reflect that that peculiar and evil desire is rampant among Jewish Rabbis but because activities of the Jews isn’t broadcasted like that of other “faiths”, little to nothing is reported. I have always believed in the Lord’s admonition that He will bless those who bless Israel and curse those who curse Israel and in obedience to the words of Jesus I have heeded it and stood with and for her even when others curse her… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Jack

Jack, as a Catholic of of course resent the implication that pedophiliac behavior is an “article of faith” of the Church. It is not. I’m not certain what the real statistics of that are between protestants and Catholics, but there has never been an absence of Catholic-bashing. I make no more excuse for it than anyone should but I’m not going to agree that Catholicism has more of them than others. It certainly gets more negative attention which is par for the course in this country. In fact, I don’t believe that pedophile behavior is encouraged or condoned in any… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

Precisely! “Israel” is “The People of God”, (wherever they exist). It is not a “place” (other than in an historical sense). In that sense it only existed for about 200 years. Then we were left with little Judah. The national name “Israel” is political, not religious. Any Christian, regardless of their confession and despite what I may think of it, should be able to recognize that Christ’s earthly ministry was largely about condemning that “Synagog of Satan”. Nothing has changed in that regard. It is still there and people still have their freewill to embrace it or reject it. All… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  lophatt

Here. I encourage everyone to read this. There are hundreds of other references but this is the best overview I’ve found:
https://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres/reeedcontrov.pdf

tukulusriantei
4 years ago

That sentences sounds cryptic like a code, the elites likes using codes among themselves.

iconordic
4 years ago

If Hillary is into,.. ‘animal sacrifice’,..You can bet that the creatures, in question, to be sacrificed, would be a whole lot higher up on the food chain than chickens,..
If you get my drift,..

Glenn47
Glenn47
4 years ago

I must lead a shelter life or because I don’t run in those circles, but I have no idea who or what moloch is, nor care to know. But staying on Hillary, her actions and treatment to other people has always led me to believe, she is not the Christian she wants us to believe while they were in the White House and we were fed those staged “go to church” photos on the Sunday News. What other President had their photos taken every Sunday. Heck, the guy we have now, his trips can be counted on one hand. Pretty… Read more »

iconordic
4 years ago
Reply to  Glenn47

Well, Glenn47,..whether or not you want to know,..Moloch was a Canaanite Demon/Diety to whom his devote’s sacrificed their infant children by burning them alive, in hopes of gaining some benefit or other,.
Which is not all that different from the mindset of people people who patronise Planned Parenthood, except, at planned Parenthood, they don’t need to deal with the sounds of screams and/or the smell of burning flesh..

Caroline Rausch
4 years ago

The Canaanites also sacrificed their first born children to Baal and ate human flesh. in fact the word cannibal comes from Canaan and Baal. I think Baal and Molech and Dagan and Sargon were probably pretty much the same god- type, and the Israelites were justified in killing them. Elijah killed 450 priests of Baa — good for him.l

iconordic
4 years ago

Well, the Israelites also killed the infants & children, so, what does that tell you about Jews,.,.?
And, they haven’t changed, all that much, since biblical times, what with the carnage they visit on the Palestinians & Lebanon, on a regular basis.
And don’t get me started on who,..really,..did the deed in New York City on 9-11-2001

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago

The early “Hebiru” (from which the word “Hebrew” is derived), practiced sacrifice of the first-born as well. In fact, the priestly class imposed this “duty” on their flock for quite sometime after their return from the first Diaspora. Their (often unwilling) “followers” lived in fear of its imposition by the priests. When Christ railed against the sacrifices of the temple cult, he wasn’t only referring to animal sacrifices. Most of us have a grossly inadequate understanding of the practices of the region over time and how they developed. By Christ’s time the concept of the one universal God was quite… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

I’m not sure they “equated” YHWH to Baal. I think they would have assumed that YHWH was probably like Baal only more powerful. They obviously believed in Baal’s existence. Again, it is important to fix these things in time. Nothing was “frozen” in time. What I’m trying to get at is that we have assumptions about the inhabitants of this area and their practices that are probably not as we generally think of them. “Gods” were thought of tribally (including YHWH). This is the “Covenant” idea that was edited into Scripture by the scribes during their stay in Babylon. This… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

Where to begin? I am not a big fan of quoting Scripture word for word as immutable fact. Often the verbiage used was used quite intentionally to suggest concepts that are now alien to us. I think it is much more important to understand what is “meant”, rather that “said”. YHWH indeed means: “I am who am”. Hebrew, having no vowels, produces this rendering (if we use the “W”). Is that important. Not in my view. For Jews (or Judahites), speaking this name was forbidden. This is obviously meant to reinforce the notion of God’s power. Remember that, as Christians,… Read more »

Recynd77
4 years ago
Reply to  lophatt

Lop (you’ll always be Lop to me), this is beautifully said, and it touched my heart: “Religion is there to help us find ways to improve our relationship [with God].” That’s how I see it, too. I like the idea that my religion helps me to practice my faith. Honestly, I doubt Heavenly Father (“Abba”) cares one whit which denomination we join, or if we join one at all (although acceptance of Jesus as Savior, repentance, and baptism is crucial). What I think He wants is for each of us to find our way back to Him, and, of course,… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Recynd77

Thank you, Recynd. I know you’re right in your belief. Some things are impossible to convey adequately. Faith can be one of them. I undertook several years of study quite a few years ago and became certified as a Master Catechist. I did that because I wanted to learn more about theology. It was grueling, but fascinating. I loved it. I have quite a library now. I do it to better understand. With faith, simple is better. It is better, however, not to trade ignorance. If you never told me this, I would know you to be blessed by your… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Recynd77

P.S., I forgot. God doesn’t care about religion. That much I know. I care, for my own reasons. Never put limits on God. God is, indeed, Love. Love is all that matters.

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

Dr. E, in re-reading your question, to keep it simple, I’ll say this: I have read many pieces wherein the author tries to say that the “God of the Israelites” (meaning YHWH), is, in fact “Baal”. This presupposes that, if the Israelites practiced human sacrifice, and they did, they could not have been worshipping YHWH. The other, well-known entity at the time was Baal-Peor, so the assumption is that they must have been worshiping Baal. The truth is that no, had you asked a priest at the time, they would have assured you they were worshipping YHWH by sacrificing the… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

Well, “Abba” is more accurately rendered as “Daddy” which would have been totally shocking to the Pharisees in light of their proscription about even naming God. Christ’s intent (or so its believed) was to demonstrate the type of relationship that God the Father wants with His children.
So, like most things in Scripture, this too is a lesson. It is not simply part of a story. He is chastising the Judaite priesthood.

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

Well, feel free to “marvel”. If you don’t believe what I’ve said, that’s fine. I can certainly see how some would want their actions portrayed that way. One could even stretch the answer to mean that, “when the people strayed……etc.”. As I said, I’m not sure what you’re driving at and if you are really looking for my opinion, it would help if I knew that. If you are just asking a specific question, you have my answer. I’m not even sure who “they” are in this context. Are we talking about the priesthood or the subjects? And, more importantly,… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

Ah…., now we’re getting somewhere and I can answer that…..NO! My personal belief, based on years of reading, is that it has always been so. The “Synagog of Satan” analogy is a good and valid one. The idea of “YHWH” worship is for the rubes. It’s rather like the Freemasons. If you’re an “Entered Apprentice”, you’re told one thing, as you “progress” you’re told another…….. The larger question as far as “do their rabbis and priests know this?”, is more difficult to understand. Judaism being a legalistic, authoritarian institution that claims itself a religion it depends on one’s definition of… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  lophatt

P.S., It should be understood that originally, in the “oral tradition” times, YHWH worship was the focus. Later, the “God of the Covenant” was invented. This was during the conversion of oral traditions to written form in Babylon. ALL of that had a political agenda. It was intended to sell the idea that the priests had the exclusive right to intercede with God. “God” (at least in my opinion) was Satan.

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

Yes indeed, we were talking past each other. IMO the Talmud is in response to Christ, “Judaism” began with Deuteronomy (about 521 B.C.). I could be wrong on the date, but not by much.
This presents a backdrop to Christ’s earthly ministry. He is basically saying, “your ancestors knew God, you know Satan”. Or, “you have morphed the love of God into a legalistic cesspool.
I really don’t see that Christians have acknowledged this fact. As you said, “ecumenism” is not productive if the intent is to merge with Satan worshippers. These are polar opposites.

Tim Shey
4 years ago
lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

Well, Jezebel got it from somewhere. I suspect it was the religion of her tribe. One little trick in the written Old Testament is the recurring theme of being a separate people that needs to be kept pure and away from all others lest they be contaminated. This is done in order to support the temple cult. What I’m saying is, “God” didn’t command anyone to stay away from anyone else. The Priests did. God would lead everyone away from Baal worship, but the priests were not as concerned with that as they were with preserving their authority over their… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

P.S., Just a note about “The state religion of Israel”. “Israel”, (the two provinces in the North and South united), lasted less than 200 years. It wasn’t a smooth running entity even when it existed. Again, scholars can pinpoint who wrote what sections of scripture. This one is another that is designed to bolster the temple cult. The author is designated “P” (for Priest). “Israel” is portrayed as the idealized situation. This is because it was the only, and brief time that the priests held sway in the entire area. The disintegration is, of course, attributed to Jezebel (and others… Read more »

Dan_Kurt
Dan_Kurt
4 years ago

Would like to defend W. Lewis Amselem from the calumny displayed in this post.
Amselem runs an erudite Conservative blog here: https://www.thediplomad.com/
He defends the “chicken” e-mail here:
https://www.thediplomad.com/2016/03/oh-stooooooooopidity.html
Both this blog and Amselem deserve better.
Dan Kurt

stlonginus
4 years ago

I’d like to respond to Dan_Kurt regarding his accusation of calumny against W. Lewis Anselem.
I call BULLSH*T.
In the many comments on Amselem’s blog regarding this particular wikileak, Amselem replied to a commenter who asked whether or not he had a high regard for Richard Perle. Amselem states: “he [Perle] is the one Prince of Darkness I would follow….”
That’s enough for me.
warcriminalswatch.org/index.php/the-culpable/36-the-culprits/85-richard-perl
And what is the image Amselem uses at his profile page?
http://www.blogger.com/profile/02316439950882822419

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

I looked at the site. It looks like a bunch of occult crap to me. Apparently the gravatar is an unknown gypsy fortune-teller. He could be the ghost of Vincent Price.
The website looks like a tribute to Aleister Crowley.

Dan_Kurt
Dan_Kurt
4 years ago

Here is what I found on Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/celtictiger101/personal-gypsy/
Looks to me like a still from a silent movie.
Still think Amselem is a good guy from reading his blog.
Dan Kurt

TPR
TPR
4 years ago

LOL at the “ghost of Vincent Price”!! 😀 My first thought on that photo was “Simon the Sorcerer” aka “Simon the Magician” aka “Simon Magus” who supposedly got saved but hadn’t gotten rid of his greedy heart yet: Acts 8:9-24: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%208:9-24&version=KJV Of couse nobody knows what he looked like but there are a few graphics at google images. Here’s just one: Also see “Simon Magnus” at the Jewish Encyclopedia (which, among other interesting things, says Simon Magnus thought he was the “messiah” & called himself “god”): https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/13747-simon-magus ~~~ I believe it was lophatt who wrote: “I think it is much… Read more »

TPR
TPR
4 years ago
Reply to  Dr. Eowyn

That’s a good question! I would imagine they are still thinking “Old Testament God” since they rejected the source of salvation/wisdom when He came to finish things up with them (“in the fullness of time”). In other words, Jesus/YHWH was always their God (ours, too, but we weren’t included way back then, as a whole, that is, Gentiles: Ephesians 2:12). So, He is STILL the same “God” (OT+NT) but He has “put them ON HOLD, ON PAUSE,” so to speak, due to their rejection, while He turned His attention to the Gentiles-as-a-giant-whole: “For I would not, brethren, that ye should… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  TPR

“Moses” did not write Deuteronomy (Second Law). Moses did not write any book (that I know of). I’m pretty sure that “Moses”, if he existed, could not write at all. I’m not a fundamentalist and I do not subscribe to the mistaken belief that someone sat, trancelike, while “God” dictated the words of Scripture. On the other hand, if someone wants to believe that, have at it. I won’t be agreeing to anything close to that. I don’t know where you get your information about Deuteronomy but any mainline scripture scholar, Protestant or Catholic would agree with my version. It… Read more »

TPR
TPR
4 years ago
Reply to  lophatt

I’m not impressed by “scholars” (especially “liberal” ones): “For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, ‘He catches the wise in their own craftiness.'” (1st Corinthians 3:19). The Holy Spirit is our teacher: “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.” (John 16:13). –“I do not subscribe to the mistaken belief that someone sat, trancelike, while ‘God’ dictated the words of Scripture.”… Read more »

Recynd77
4 years ago
Reply to  lophatt

You bring up a subject I really hadn’t considered before (whether ancient characters like Moses and King David actually existed). I did a very quick search, and, by golly, few really agree! I hadn’t realized Biblical scholars were so divided on the issue. I started to bring up that Josephus wrote quite a lot about Moses and told many interesting stories about him that the Bible doesn’t mention (or merely hints at: his first wife, for example), but while Josephus had access to extensive writings and historic accounts that most weren’t privvy to, he was still 1200 years too late… Read more »

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Recynd77

Recynd, if you get a chance, read Douglas Reed. It isn’t that long and its well worth it. You can find the information just about anywhere, but Reed puts it together in a way that’s completely understandable. These Bible stories are not unique to the descendants of Abraham. Many come from neighboring traditions. They simply swapped the “Hebiru’ name for the original. The Jewish Encyclopedia will support this. Many respected rabbis would agree as well. They continue to speak of the characters as if they existed, but know that they probably did not. That includes “David” (the name means “Commander”).… Read more »

Recynd77
4 years ago
Reply to  lophatt

I’ve got Reed downloaded and ready to read. 🙂

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Recynd77

You’ll be glad you did!

lophatt
lophatt
4 years ago
Reply to  Recynd77

P.S., re: Josephus. I’ve read it.

TPR
TPR
4 years ago

Oops, typo, Magus, not Magnus.
And I forgot to add John 1:1: “In the beginning the WORD was with God, & the WORD was God.” Point being that Jesus has always been the “communicator” with mankind, the Word, the speaker, the mediator, etc., in both the Old & New Testaments. It’s a thrilling thing to come to know. 🙂

stlonginus
4 years ago

Yes, but just be very careful of words. They can easily deceive. I’ve come across info about YHWH (aka the Tretragrammaton)
Didn’t GOD say he was “I AM” and not Yahweh?
https://remnantradio.org/Archives/articles/sacred_name.htm

TPR
TPR
4 years ago
Reply to  stlonginus

I don’t know about the more “modern” Bibles of the last few decades, but the older ones, from early 20th Century & prior, the “Tetragrammaton” YHWH was originally in Scripture up to… (I forget the numbers but) something like 5,000-7,000 times. Some of those older Bibles used the “English” word Jehovah in places where YHWH was. And in others, such as the KJV, they only used Jehovah in seven places (https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/jehovah), & put LORD in All Caps in all the other places. I don’t get hung up or worried about the name issues any more, been there, done that (such… Read more »

stlonginus
4 years ago

ALSO: TPR above wrote:
“I believe it was lophatt who wrote: “I think it is much more important to understand what is ‘meant.’ rather than ‘said.’””
Isn’t that what the MSM and all the new age apologists say about Bergoglio and all the detritus he spews?
It’s all very Talmudic.
But who am I to judge?

TPR
TPR
4 years ago
Reply to  stlonginus

Haha, now that you mention it, that’s true, the media DOES try to explain away what the current Pope says.

TPR
TPR
4 years ago

A little timeline: Paul wrote Romans, further above, circa 57-58 A.D., & the events in Acts 28 (his last major recorded pleading with Jewish leaders to believe in Jesus, while he was in prison in Rome) was just a few years later, circa 60-61-62.
“Be it known therefore unto you [Jewish leaders], that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that THEY WILL HEAR IT!” (Acts 28:28). (I love that!)
In context vs. 16-29: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+28%3A16-29&version=KJV
The NKJV is a little less “archaic”-sounding:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+28%3A16-29&version=NKJV

trackback

[…] WikiLeaks also obtained thousands of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s supposedly-deleted emails, which WikiLeaks has been releasing piecemeal to the public. (See, for example “Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email”) […]

trackback

[…] A critical goal can hardly be reached with governmental or international funds. Such a goal remains a project from the oppressed communities making use of their inner knowledge. The current degree of compromise from the activists coalitions as environmentalists, feminists or anti-racists leaders whom actions are dictated with intergovernmental and governmental policies and funds, motivated by the rush to power access and political influence, is influencing negatively political debate and is damaging the future of the most wealth negatively impacted minority : kids. […]

trackback

[…] WikiLeaks also obtained thousands of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s supposedly-deleted emails, which WikiLeaks has been releasing piecemeal to the public. (See, for example “Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email”) […]

trackback

[…] WikiLeaks also obtained thousands of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s supposedly-deleted emails, which WikiLeaks has been releasing piecemeal to the public. (See, for example “Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email”) […]

trackback

[…] WikiLeaks also obtained thousands of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s supposedly-deleted emails, which WikiLeaks has been releasing piecemeal to the public. (See, for example “Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email”) […]

trackback

[…] Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email […]

Shelby
Shelby
4 years ago

Are they still sacrificing children? And is that the joke?

trackback

[…] WikiLeaks also obtained thousands of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s supposedly-deleted emails, which WikiLeaks has been releasing piecemeal to the public. (See, for example “Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email”) […]

trackback

[…] WikiLeaks also obtained thousands of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s supposedly-deleted emails, which WikiLeaks has been releasing piecemeal to the public. (See, for example “Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email”) […]

trackback

[…] primera vez que reportó los siguientes en un post hace unos dos meses, ” Hillary ayudante habla de sacrificio de animales a demon Moloc en el correo electrónico de WikiLeak… […]

trackback

[…] Source: Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email […]

trackback

[…] the Star of Moloch, the satanic god by which children are sacrificed, the same god Hillary’s staff references in an […]

trackback

[…] the Star of Moloch, the satanic god by which children are sacrificed, the same god Hillary’s staff references in an […]

trackback

[…] the Star of Moloch, the satanic god by which children are sacrificed, the same god Hillary’s staff references in an […]

trackback

[…] WikiLeaks also obtained thousands of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s supposedly-deleted emails, which WikiLeaks has been releasing piecemeal to the public. (See, for example “Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email”) […]

trackback

[…] the Star of Moloch, the satanic god by which children are sacrificed, the same god Hillary’s staff references in an email. Like the sexual imagery on full display in Egyptian pagan worship and […]

trackback

[…] I first reported the following in a post about two months ago, “Hillary aide talks about animal sacrifice to demon Moloch in WikiLeaks email“. […]