Hands Off Our Founding Document You Liberal A**Holes!

Rate this post

On June 23, 2011, Time magazine published an essay entitled One Document, Under Siege” (one page version, here) by Richard Stengel.  I consider the publication of this article to be nothing less than a scandal.  Besides the deep philosophical disagreements I have with Mr. Stengel, the piece simply fails as journalism.  As I will demonstrate in this post, there were fourteen objectively verifiable errorsin Mr. Stengel’s piece, half of which could have been discovered simply by reading the Constitution itself.

I will lay out all of the false claims and evidence in a moment, but let me preview the most egregious error in the article, when Mr. Stengel wrote this:

If the Constitution was intended to limit the federal government, it sure doesn’t say so.

As one commenter wrote: “I had to read it twice to believe my eyes. Time really did say this.”  And while I will prove definitively in a moment that he is wrong, I suspect every single person reading this knows it already.

The fact that this and thirteen other egregious errors appeared in Time at all is bad enough.  But further, it was a cover story:

And look at the top left corner.  This is their history issue.

It is also scandalous because of who wrote the piece.  The author is not only the Managing Editor for Time, but he spent two years as President and CEO of the National Constitution Center.  And even today, he works with the National Constitution Center’s Peter Jennings Project for Journalists and the Constitution, whose stated mission is “to help both professional journalists and students interested in journalism understand constitutional issues more deeply.”  That is right.  He is there to help journalists understand the Constitution better.

So I will present to you fourteen clear errors Mr. Stengel has made in his article, starting with the most egregious errors.  Here are the fourteen errors, in short:

  • The Constitution does not limit the Federal Government.
  • The Constitution is not law.
  • The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment emancipated the slaves.
  • The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment granted the right to vote to African Americans.
  • The original Constitution declared that black people were to be counted as three-fifths of a person.
  • The original, unamended Constitution prohibited women from voting.
  • The Commerce Clause grants Congress the power to tax individuals based on whether they buy a product or service.
  • Inter arma enim silent leges translates as “in time of war, the Constitution is silent.”
  • The War Powers Act allows the president to unilaterally wage war for sixty days.
  • We have only declared war five times.
  • Alexander Hamilton wanted a king for America.
  • Social Security is a debt within the meaning of Section Four of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • Naturalization depends on your birth.
  • The Obamacare mandate is a tax.

When I am done with this post, I am going to make a bleg where I ask you to try to help get out the word about this egregiously incorrect cover story.  So stay tuned to the end (or jump ahead if you feel like it).

But first here, point-by-point, is proof that each one of those claims are incorrect.

 

False Claim #1: The Constitution does not limit the Federal Government.

 

(more…)

 

 Just a word for Mr. Stengel and Time magazine, this is our founding document, written by men more intelligent and relevant than you can ever hope to be. We don’t need your half-assed interpretation of it’s meaning, we know what it means and what it stands for and TRUE AMERICANS (unlike yourselves) will defend it to their last breath.

Tom in NC

 

Please follow and like us:
0
 

6 responses to “Hands Off Our Founding Document You Liberal A**Holes!

  1. I’ll keep an eye open for when it’s ready. I’ll share it with some friends, and put the link my own blog, later today.

     
  2. It is no wonder that Time put this analysis in their magazine. They are true liberals to the core. We cannot expect truth and accuracy. They serve a different master!

     
  3. “ALIPAC CALLS FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA”

    Posted on Tuesday, June 28 @ 10:31:57 EDT
    Topic: Barack Obama Campaign for President
    June 28, 2011

    For National Release

    Contact: Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC)
    (866) 703-0864 / Press@alipac.us

    Excerpt:

    “The Americans for Legal Immigration PAC is calling for the impeachment of President Barack Obama for his involvement in the Operation Gunrunner scandal, as well as his recent edict instructing federal employees to establish a form of amnesty for illegal aliens in defiance of the Congress, existing federal laws, and the US Constitution.

    Obama’s ICE Director John Morton issued a memo on June 17th to all ICE Field Office Directors, Special Agents-in-Charge, and all Chief Counsel, authorizing them to decline to remove illegal aliens who meet the qualifications for amnesty under the DREAM Act Amnesty which Congress has rejected many times.

    Congressional investigations have determined that Obama’s ATF and Justice Department have been supplying assault weapons to the drug cartels that import most of America’s cocaine, methamphetamine, and illegal immigrants.

    “President Obama is no longer the legitimate President of the United States,” said William Gheen, President of ALIPAC. “By arming drug and human smugglers with assault weapons that have been used to kill American and Mexican citizens and police forces, and by ordering Amnesty for illegal aliens which has been rejected by both the Congress and the American public more than eight times, Obama has committed a form of Treason against the United States and must be removed from office by Congress.”

    Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) is a national organization founded on 9/11 of 2004. ALIPAC has over 40,000 supporters, comprised of Americans of every race, party, religion, and walk of life, who represent the over 80% who want America’s existing immigration laws enforced.

    ALIPAC is sending letters to the 137 current members of Congress whom the group endorsed and supported in the 2010 elections requesting the impeachment process to begin immediately in the interest of public safety and civil stability.

    “Obama just made it clear to the American public that he does not care what they think, what the current federal laws are, what the US Constitution says, or what Congress has ratified,” said William Gheen. “Congress must take immediate action to stop Obama or the American Republic will fall. What use are elections, candidates, or the Congress, if the Executive Branch rules by decree?”

    All ALIPAC supporters and like-minded Americans who oppose Amnesty and illegal immigration are called upon to immediately call and write their members of Congress demanding the impeachment of President Barack Obama for crimes against the people of the United States.

    If Congress does not respond by July 15, ALIPAC will move to call for public protests across the nation calling for the ouster of this authoritarian regime which feels it can arm rebel groups invading America with their illegal cargo while forcing an Amnesty on the public.

    The self-governance of American citizens and the health of the American Republic must be guarded against this form of Treason.

    The Congress will be given an opportunity to act before members of the public take things into their own hands and call for a day of nationwide protests.

    For more information, to schedule interviews or to show your support for the impeachment of President Obama, please visit ALIPAC at: http://www.ALIPAC.us

    ###

    DISCUSS THIS NATIONAL PRESS RELEASE WITH ALIPAC’s ONLINE ACTIVISTS AT THIS LINK…

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1239458.html#1239458

    Read More Here: http://www.alipac.us/article6373.html

     
  4. An Excellent Comment From: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=23356#comments

    “Sovereign Soul
    June 29th, 2011 @ 3:22 pm

    Many bloggers strongly attest that aka Obama CAN NOT BE IMPEACHED — ONLY LEGITIMATE incumbents can be impeached. There’s strong possibility that aka may not even BE a citizen of the USA! It IS known that at about age 10, he was adopted by an Indonesian step-father and thus became an Indonesian citizen.

    There are NO documents shown that would indicate that aka [“Obama”] ever regained any putative claim to be an American citizen. Impeachment is for legitimate, American citizens. The presidency is the only office where the NATURAL BORN type of citizen is required — and for just the reasons we have seen in the acts of this treasonous office holder.

    HE [“Obama”] MUST BE ARRESTED for his criminal actions — many of which are now public record. Impeachment is for Nancy Pelosi and all others who lied to get aka’s [The Current 100% Foreign Indonesian Citizen Imposter who is a 100% Undocumented Illegal Alien, & a 100% Undocumented Illegal Immigrant, & a 100% Dictator Terrorist Usurper Imposter, a 100% Foreign & Domestic Enemy Treasonous Traitor, a 100% Communist Marxist/Islamist Muslim Domestic Terrorist Usurper, & the 100% Daily Serial Career Criminal, Barack Hussein Obama’s] name on the ballots.”

    * * * * * * *

     
  5. The Big Lie… Joseph Goebbels ain’t got nuthin’ on this dude.

    For leftards, it’s “living document” for everything they want to force upon everyone else… then they like it.

     
  6. The Constitution does restrain the Federal Government. Unfortunately, it does not limit it enough according to the recent iterations of the Supreme Court. Of course, the Supreme Court is made up of lawyers intent upon fulfilling the desires of the Corporatocracy. The Coraporatists are, and nothing less than, fascists, according to the well known definition of Mussolini, and he knew of what he spoke.

    As for impeachment, I believe it is arrest first, but impeach? Not unless he’s really legitimately there. I am, however, not completely decided on that one.

    Thanks for the list of falsehoods.

    My personal favorite is No. 2. The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. Nothing more, nothing less. Now, he didn’t really say the Constitution isn’t a law did he?

    Tom, go for it. I believe Time needs some “time” with Charlotte Isserbyt.

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *