Hagmann Investigation of Soetoro-Obama Eligibility

Rate this post

New In-Depth Investigation Into Soetoro aka; Obama, Spells Trouble Ahead!
politicalvelcraft.org ^ | 04-09-2011

Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 4:46:31 AM by tsowellfan
New In-Depth Investigation Into Soetoro aka; Obama, Spells Trouble Ahead!
A brand new, in-depth investigation into the background of Barack Obama may spell big trouble ahead regarding the issue of Presidential eligibility.
The investigation was conducted by Northeast Intelligence Network–a team of experienced, professional private investigators whose services have been utilized by Fortune-500 companies. The director, Douglas J. Hagmann, is a 23-year veteran in high-level investigations and is a member of the International Counter-Terrorism Officers Association.
Hagmann’s investigation into the background and Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as President of the United States is extensive and thorough. His conclusions are stunning.
For example, neither of Obama’s parents were citizens of the United States at the time of his birth. Therefore, Obama would have to have been born on U.S. soil in order to qualify as a ‘natural born citizen’ according to the qualifications specified in the Constitution.
But Hagmann’s investigation reveals that, contrary to the notion of those who point to a short-form birth certificate in Hawaii, and 2 birth announcements in Hawaiian newspapers, neither of these factors proves anything at all about Obama’s status or citizenship:
the Certification of Live Birth is consistently cited by individuals, the media and others to prove the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein OBAMA. Nonetheless, even an authenticated and genuine Certification of Live Birth is legally insufficient for the purpose of proving eligibility, as it merely represents that OBAMA’s birth record is on file in the state of Hawaii. It falls short of providing the information necessary to determine constitutional eligibility in at least two areas: it does not offer any information regarding who supplied the information, nor does it confirm the authenticity of the information provided. Again, it merely indicates that the information is “on file.”
In other words, the ‘certification of live birth’ as touted by Obama apologists and the mainstream media as ‘proof’ Obama meets the eligibility requirements of the Constitution actually proves nothing.
In addition, Hagmann disputes the notion that birth announcements in local Hawaiian newspapers provide proof:
Many who argue that Barack Hussein OBAMA II was born in Hawaii not only point to the COLB as direct evidence of eligibility, but they also point to two separate birth announcements that appear in the Honolulu Sunday Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin in 1961. Those doing so either fail to understand the legal definition of a natural born citizen as it applies to the eligibility factor, or are guilty of intentionally misdirecting the core issue. A birth announcement is simply that – a public announcement that a baby was born. The birth announcements do not provide any information about the child’s citizenship, cannot be authenticated, and hold no weight of evidence to support either side of the eligibility argument.
However, the key information in Hagmann’s report that casts doubts upon Obama’s eligibility is the fact that the very organizations that published the short-form certificate of live birth and the 2 birth announcements in newspapers have direct connections with Barack Obama.
The DailyKos is the primary suspect and the first entity to publish ‘proof’ of a birth certificate. The DailyKos is an ultra-Leftwing hate-group that not only is ‘in the tank’ for Obama but smears and seeks to destroy those who oppose extremist, Leftwing initiatives in politics.
‘Fight the Smears,’ which also pointed to these 2 erroneous pieces of ‘evidence,’ is owned by ‘Organizing for America,’ which was originally named ‘Obama for America.’ This speaks for itself.
And finally, there is the much-hallowed ‘Factcheck.org’–supposedly an independent, non-partisan clearinghouse that separates truth from fiction in the media and on the Internet. Hagmann’s investigation reveals that Factcheck is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, which receives its primary funding from the Annenberg Foundation.
Barack Obama was a founding member, chairman, and past President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was also funded by the Annenberg Foundation. Thus, the supposed ‘neutrality’ of Factcheck.org can safely be called into question.
The bottom line is that so far absolutely no positive proof has been provided that establishes that Barack Obama was born on American soil.
Why is this important? An individual who would spend millions of dollars hiding his background and pertinent documents from the public, and who would make false statements about about his history, cannot be trusted to tell the American people the truth about what his policy initiatives are intended to do regarding the ‘fundamental change’ of America.
More DetailsVideo: A Question of Eligibility – The FULL Movie!
NOTE:      HAGMANN & HAGMANN REPORT Blogtalk Radio Show 4-9-2011 discusses their investigation.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Hagmann Investigation of Soetoro-Obama Eligibility

  1. I have leaned towards the idea that there is indeed something wrong with the picture presented by those who swear Obama was born in this country. Last night on Hannity, he and Ann Coulter were pooh poohing the idea that Obama is not a citizen, born in this country. They are not the only conservatives that I have heard say this on tv. I do not understand how they can say that so definitively as they did. Something is definitely wrong.

  2. I heard Ann Coulter too Linda,she made an absolute fool out of herself,and probably lost the majority of her book sales. I e-mailed Sean immediately and let him know what I thought. Regardless of the BC,the guy is still not Constitutionally able to be President,and this does not take a rocket scientist to figure out. How the DNC,thought they could get away with such an assault on the Constitution should send shivers down the spineof every citizen who cherishes a Republic,based on constitutional principals. Trump is right on focusing on the obvious. The fraudulent ssn,foregn adoption,all part of the deceit and denigration of the Nation.

  3. Someone needs to get Pelosi in the hot seat! she knows exactly what happened.

  4. Other than the claim that Obama’s mom wasn’t a citizen at the time of his birth, nothing about Hagmann’s findings is new. We already know all about why the certificate of live birth (COLB) is suspect; why a newspaper announcement is not acceptable evidence of his birth; and that the websites that posted images of Obama’s purported COLB are all leftwing sites. All this and more have been uncovered, written about, as well as posted here on the Fellowship. (See the red-colored posts on our “The Obama Chronicles” page.)
    But the claim that Stanley Ann Dunham wasn’t a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama’s birth is something I’ve never seen ANYWHERE before. I’d like to see the evidence.
    Maybe Hagmann is trying to get Trump’s attention — and cash?

  5. Oh Hooray, reading the comments here always makes me feel better! : )
    I originally came to comment about, “For example, neither of Obama’s parents were citizens of the United States at the time of his birth.”
    This was news to me , as well….I am certain that I have heard that Stanley Dunham (mother ) was a minor and had lived abroad for a certain period of time prior to her son’s birth so that is problematic combined with the supposed father’s foreign citizenship.
    I have never before heard that she had renounced her citizenship or was a foreigner herself.
    I, too, would welcome further explanation on this.
    I know in my bones that surely Obama is ineligible but I hope all the evidence presented and those presenting it are both unimpeachable.
    What did make me really smile was Tina’s comment on Ann Coulter. My husband came into my studio wondering why I was yelling at my TV! This was during Ann’s narcissistic dismissal ( and flaunting her lack of awareness of facts, the COLB is NOT interchangeable with a long form BC ) of the entire question of the BC and Trump and then launching into her nonsense about Chris Christie running and then the coup de grace, mentioning that cardboard aging Ken doll Romney, who makes me want to chew glass.
    Ok, rant over…
    I do love this blog!

  6. If he’s claiming to be born in Hawaii, then why can’t he just say what hospital. Does he not know? Pretty simple to check the hospital records on the date of his birth. I have always wondered why this issue was never pushed farther BEFORE he was elected!

    • What Mr. Trump is saying (if I heard correctly) is that no hospital records exist for Obama. I’m not sure how/why he could make this claim without knowledge to the fact. I wish he would speak more as to what his “investigators” are actually uncovering in Hawaii.

  7. The video and Hagmann’s radio show were excellent!
    All of these people are true patriots.

  8. My sentiments, exactly. The more elites of all stripes (MSM, Dems, GOP, RINOs, Obama) dis and mock Trump, the more I think they’re frightened of and fear him, the more I like Trump. The bipartisan ruling elite don’t want this guy in the White House. I wonder why. Ummmm….

  9. The real issue: regardless of where Obama was born, the real issue is whether he ever had dual citizenship in Indonesia. Or, did his mother give up his citizenship & make him an Indonesian citizen while she was married to an Indonesian citizen & attended school.

  10. Roger Wiltshire

    It’s utterly untrue that Obama’s mother was not a US citizen at the time of his birth. According to Wikipedia, she was,”Born in Wichita, Kansas, Dunham spent her childhood in California, Oklahoma, Texas and Kansas and her teenage years in Mercer Island, Washington, and most of her adult life in Hawaii and Indonesia.” She met Obama’s father in Hawaii where they were both college students. On the day Obama was born, she was 18 years, 9 months, and 6 days old.
    It is totally irrelevant where President Obama was born. No parent can change or take away a birthright American child’s citizenship. That can only be done by the person themselves as an adult. Don’t waste your time worrying about this.

  11. Sounds like disinfo, to me.
    The eligibility issue should be focussed more on the “natural-born” requirement to Constitutionally-qualify for the ultimate offices of public trust: president and vice-president.
    The Constitution itself does not specify what the words “natural-born” mean.
    The First Congress, Second Session(1790) corrected that omission by defining the words to mean “born of TWO Citizens.”
    In 1797, Emmerrich Vattel wrote the Law of Nations. In it, he also wrote that the “natural born” are born of parentS who are citizens.
    In 1814(iirc), SCOTUS verified Vattel in “The Venus,” citing his words EXACTLY, albeit translated from the original French.
    In 2008, in S-511, the Senate declared McCain “natural-born” and therefore eligible for the office, by CITING the First Congress.
    So how can they have it both ways? How can McCain be declared eligible by virtue of the First Congress’ decision, yet D’ohbama is not held to that same standard?
    Remember: the issue is NOT whether or not Obama is a citizen; it is whether or not BOTH parents were at the time of his birth. Especially since the 14th Amendment, everyone born here is considered to be a citizen, aka “native-born,” just not “NATURAL”-born. They’re US citizens, but ineligible for those TWO offices because their PARENTS were not citizens at the time of birth.
    To get distracted over the issue of the birth certificate plays right into the hands of those who delight in marginalizing, mocking, deriding, obfuscating, and otherwise ignoring the truth.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *