Frightening: Nuke expert says there was no containment of damaged Fukushima reactors

Rate this post

On March 11, 2011, a 9.03 magnitude earthquake struck off the northeastern coast of Japan. It was the most powerful known earthquake ever to have hit Japan, and one of the five most powerful earthquakes in the world since modern record-keeping began in 1900.
The earthquake triggered powerful tsunami waves that reached heights of up to 133 ft in Miyako in Tōhoku’s Iwate Prefecture, and which, in the Sendai area, traveled up to 6 mi inland. The earthquake moved Honshu (the main island of Japan) 8 ft east and shifted the Earth on its axis by estimates of between 4 to 10 inches.

FukushimaDamaged reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

The earthquake and tsunami, in turn, led to a series of equipment failures, nuclear meltdowns, and releases of radioactive materials at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. 

It is the largest nuclear disaster since the Chernobyl disaster of 1986, and only the second disaster (along with Chernobyl) to measure Level 7 on the  International Nuclear Event Scale (INES). This scale runs from 0, indicating an abnormal situation with no safety consequences, to 7, indicating an accident causing widespread contamination with serious health and environmental effects. Prior to Fukushima, the Chernobyl disaster was the only level 7 accident on record, while the Three Mile Island accident was a level 5 accident.

On October 12, 2012, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) that maintains the Fukushima plant, admitted for the first time that it had failed to take stronger measures to prevent nuclear disasters for fear of inviting lawsuits or protests against its nuclear plants.

Now, a nuclear expert at the University of Missouri tells us the Fukushima disaster is even much worse than we’ve been told: There really is no containment because the melted core had cracked the containment vessel.
Nuclear meltdown is an informal term for the accidental melting of the core of a nuclear reactor. A core melt accident occurs when the heat generated by a nuclear reactor exceeds the heat removed by the cooling systems to the point where at least one nuclear fuel element exceeds its melting point. A meltdown is considered very serious because of the potential, however remote, that radioactive materials could breach all containment and escape (or be released) into the environment, resulting in radioactive contamination and fallout, and potentially leading to radiation poisoning of people and animals nearby.
George Washington writes for ZeroHedge, Feb. 27, 2013, that Dr. Steven Starr, who is the director of the Clinical Laboratory Science Program at the University of Missouri and a senior scientist at Physicians for Social Responsibility, says:
“The Japanese basically lied about what happened with the reactors for months. They said they were trying to prevent a meltdown, when in fact they knew within the first couple of days Reactors 1, 2, and 3 at Fukushima Daiichi had melted down, and they actually melted through the steel containment vessels. So there was a worst case scenario that they were trying to hide, they even knew that at that time enormous amounts of radiation were released over Japan and some of it even went over Tokyo […] The melted core cracked the containment vessel, there really is no containment. So as soon as they pump the water in it leaks out again.”
Asahi Shimbum notes that the location of Fukushima melted fuel is unknown. It could be “scattered” in piping, vessels … “we’ve yet to identify all hotspots” around the plant.
While the Japanese government tried to cover up the lack of containment with “mission accomplished” type announcements of “cold shutdown“, the loss of containment has been known for years.
For example, AP wrote in December 2011:

The nuclear fuel moved as it melted, so its condition and locations are little known.

AP noted a couple of days later:

The complex still faces numerous concerns, triggering criticism that the announcement of “cold shutdown conditions” is based on a political decision rather than science. Nobody knows exactly where and how the melted fuel ended up in each reactor ….

Washington’s blog noted:

If the reactors are “cold”, it may be because most of the hot radioactive fuel has leaked out.
Indeed, if the center of the reactors are in fact relatively “cold”, it may be because most of the hot radioactive fuel has leaked out of the containment vessels and escaped into areas where it can do damage to the environment.

The New York Times pointed out in November 2011:

A former nuclear engineer with three decades of experience at a major engineering firm … who has worked at all three nuclear power complexes operated by Tokyo Electric [said] “If the fuel is still inside the reactor core, that’s one thing” …. But if the fuel has been dispersed more widely, then we are far from any stable shutdown.”

After drilling a hole in the containment vessel of Fukushima reactor 2, TEPCO could not find the reactor’s melted fuel.
The Fukushima fuel pools continue to be one of the main threats to Japan, the United States … and all of humanity.
And the Fukushima accident is presently causing higher and higher levels of contamination hundreds of miles away … and is still contaminating wildlife thousands of miles away.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Frightening: Nuke expert says there was no containment of damaged Fukushima reactors

  1. Been reading about this horror story in Natural News.

  2. Dr. Eowyn, I wanted you to see this video. What do you think? What does our Gov’t and the hidden and not so hidden powers that be have planned for us? Is this the new discoveries/revelations that Pope Benedict was referring to when he first announced his resignation?
    WOW…This is a much watch video. This video even describes Hillary’s plane crash in Iran. A peace treaty? Mass unemployment? Free energy? Traveling faster than the speed of light? What do you guy’s think about this?

    • Thanks, Kathy. This is so woo-woo I will need to really study this, as well as ask my active and retired military contacts in the U.S. and Australia.

    • One of my US military contacts responded. Here’s his email:
      I refer to my earlier comments regarding the incredible chutzpah exhibited by people from Arab/middle eastern/muslim cultures, and by the Iranians in particular.
      When he can demonstrate to the world’s people directly, and not only allegedly to the world’s government, a vehicle that creates a controllable and direct-able gravitational field, I’ll believe he can generate Mach35 speeds or space travel without fuel or faster-than-light travel or whatever else he claims. When he stops allegedly giving his technology/knowledge to world governments, and starts provably giving it to the world’s people directly, I’ll believe him. When he demonstrates to the world’s people directly, and not only allegedly to world governments, a “dismantling” of an “F-18 from 1000’s of kilometers” I’ll believe him.

      For the record I agree with him. Anyone can make sensational claims. But until (1) this Iranian scientist actually publishes his “free energy technology” in peer-reviewed scientific journals; (2) so that other scientists can confirm or disconfirm his claims by trying to replicate what he did; and (3) the Iranians actually DEMONSTRATE that they’ve actually produced technology (space travel!) from this “free energy,” all this is so much hot air.

  3. This is why I titled “The End of Japan as We Knew It”, the article I wrote for FOTM, as I did. I knew this event was far more deadly then the authorities claimed, and its consequences would be very deep and world-wide. Thus, Japan as an economic powerhouse is likely at an end in our lifetimes, and I am now 70. After Japan collapses a great deal of economic and social havoc will ensue, and it will be impossible for our so-called ‘leaders’ to continue denial amidst their irresponsible lack of useful action.
    This event took place on “The Rim of Fire” so we shouldn’t be surprised if it is followed by a large volcanic eruption as well, another sign of major plate tectonics in action, much as Krakatoa did in 1883 []. None of this bodes well, as the ash from such a volcano will disturb weather patterns and carry radiation world-wide.
    “With an estimated Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) of 6,[4] the eruption was equivalent to 200 megatons of TNT (840 PJ) —about 13,000 times the nuclear yield of the Little Boy bomb (13 to 16 kt) that devastated Hiroshima, Japan, during World War II, and four times the yield of Tsar Bomba (50 Mt), the most powerful nuclear device ever detonated.”

  4. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this well-researched post. It is horrible that it is unknown how much or where the radioactive fuel has been dispersed. This is just horrible for the destruction particularly of wildlife, animals, God’s creatures who are so innocent. I agree Dr. Eowyn, we are living in interesting and terrible times!

    • Dear Joan: I often refer to Dr Weaver’s classic essay that launched the USofA conservative renaissance in 1948, a gem you will love, as he is a devout Christian. He remarks {and I paraphrase here as I can’t easily find the exact quote], that our base attitude toward Nature/the Creation is that she is some kind of slovenly housekeeper at the best of times. His ultimate judgement of our era is that “our great sin is that we lack Piety, which is at the base of all moral decisions,” and I agree 150% w/him in this!

  5. Have you ever heard of the allegations made by “Jim Stone”? It’s something to consider.

  6. Reblogged this on


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.