Fort Hood Shooter Has Drawn $278G In Salary Since Massacre. No Time For Duct Tape. Head Explosion Imminent.


Maj. Nidal Hasan

Remember this piece of human excrement. well it seems since he’s not been convicted, and all sorts of military rules he’s been collecting a nice salary. that’s not the worst part. you see since it was classified 

(Umm graphic head explosion coming, ran out of duct tape)

workplace violence” our brave troops who were killed and wounded have been getting such minimal BENEFITS because it is not classified “Combat Related”  well that might be changing according to email i received this am. so this will be a twofer.    ~ Steve~ExplodingHead
Published May 21, 2013
The Army psychiatrist accused of killing 13 people and wounding 32 others during a shooting at Fort Hood has reportedly been paid more than $278,000 since the 2009 incident.
U.S. Department of Defense officials confirmed to that Maj. Nidal Hasan’s salary cannot be suspended unless he is proven guilty in the Nov. 5, 2009, shooting in Texas, citing the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Jury selection in his trial is scheduled to begin May 30.
If Hasan, 42, had been a civilian Defense Department employee, Army officials could have suspended his pay after just seven days, reports.
A military judge refused to delay Hasan’s trial earlier this month after his attorneys sought to postpone the court-martial to Sept. 1. Hasan’s attorneys claimed military jurors may be influenced by national media coverage of the Boston Marathon bombings that compared the two Muslim suspects — Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev – to Hasan.
Prosecutors countered that the delay was unnecessary because Hasan was mentioned only briefly in some news reports about the April 15 attacks in Boston.
Hasan faces the death penalty or life in prison without parole if convicted of 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder.
The White House and Pentagon have refused to characterize Hasan’s attack as terrorism, instead terming it “workplace violence.” The victims have been denied Purple Hearts and are suing the military because they claim the “workplace violence” designation gives them diminished access to medical care and financial benefits normally available to those whose wounds are designated as “combat related.”


Part 2

Did You Notice the Policy

 Change on Ft. Hood

Shooter In Obama’s Terror Speech?

 @ The Blaze

During President Barack Obama’s counter-terrorism speech on Thursday he did something that hasn’t yet been done by the administration — at least not so overtly. He referred to the Fort Hood shooting as an act that was “inspired by larger notions of violent jihad.” That is big step toward dubbing the attack an act of terror instead of “workplace violence” as it has been categorized.
“Deranged or alienated individuals — often U.S. citizens or legal residents — can do enormous damage. Particularly when inspired by larger notions of violent jihad.” Obama said during the speech. “That pull towards extremism appears to have led to the shooting at Fort Hood and the bombing of the Boston Marathon.”
By linking the Boston bombing, which has officially been called terrorism, with Fort Hood, Obama essentially admitted that the former is a comparable act that could (or should) be given the same designation. This is notable for a number of reasons.
For quite some time, the government has taken criticism from liberals and conservatives, alike, for officially calling the 2009 shooting (the only prime suspect is former U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan) “workplace violence” instead of terrorism. Contention over this designation continues to run rampant.
Earlier this month, ABC News reported that at least one Democrat is joining the chorus of those who are discontented with the Obama administration’s failure to use the terrorism label:

A long-serving Pennsylvania Democrat has joined Republican colleagues to ask Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to overturn the “indefensible” decision by the military to designate the Fort Hood massacre “workplace violence” rather than terrorism.
“This designation has since resulted in an embarrassing lack of care and treatment by our military for the victims and their families,” said Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Penn.), Rep. Thomas Rooney (R-Fla.) and Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Virg.) in a later dated May 6 and obtained by ABC News.
In the letter, the trio of lawmakers blame “considerations of ‘political correctness’” not only for the “workplace violence” designation, but for allowing the attack to unfold in the first place.
Fattah’s entrance into the controversy comes after Republicans in Congress have generally taken the lead in pressing the White House for answers about the victims’ treatment, as chronicled in an ABC News investigation.

Watch Obama’s comments about Fort Hood,
Following the speech, Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) noted the importance of Obama’s words, claiming that they may help push through efforts for a reclassification of the shooting.
“When he put Ft. Hood in the same breath as Boston… he was basically making our case for us,” Rooney said in an interview with Fox News.

There may be hope yet for our wounded WARRIORS and their families .


Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply

Notify of
AKA John Galt

Reblogged this on U.S. Constitutional Free Press.


These idiots never heard of spies in the service, in government or double agents? Because they get hung or shot, not paid, immediately, just ask George Washington what he would do, really.

Ron W
Ron W

This jihadist was aided and abetted in his mass murder at Ft. Hood by our troops BEING DISARMED on their own bases. This policy was reportedly initiated by Clinton, kept by Bush and, of course, there was no CHANGE with Obama. They are accomplices in this act of terrorism by making sure that our troops were unarmed victims who couldn’t shoot back–while they are all surrouned by hired guns at all times.


Ron W – that unarmed policy has been in effect for way longer than I can remember – when I started my military time (1974) the only folks allowed to carry arms were us MPs – and ONLY when we were on duty. Otherwise, all weapons were ‘secured’ in arms rooms – unless they were needed for training. Now as to the small fortune that name deleted has accrued, the military judges should find him in contempt and in violation of several Articles under the UCMJ and fine him every single day – money to be placed in some crime… Read more »


That was a very intelligent and insightful article. Thank you very much.


Thank You. 😀


Hmm, hanging or firing squad?… lethal injection for a military death penalty wasn’t in effect at the time. (Money’ll will get sued out of his estate by families of the wounded or fatten his lawyer’s wallet and he’ll never get to spend any himself on death row– it’ll end up going to better folk than him.)


This whole thing is rotten. Any idiot knows what this attack was. Shameful he’s still getting paid.