Feminism Is Communism

image
Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives
September 2, 2014 by Mallory Millett
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/mallorymillett/marxist-feminisms-ruined-lives/#.VAW9lif7mH8.twitter
Mallory Millett resides in New York City with her husband of over twenty years. She is CFO for several corporations and a long-standing member of The David Horowitz Freedom Center.
“When women go wrong men go right after them.”
– Mae West
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Winston Churchill wrote this over a century ago.
During my junior year in high school, the nuns asked about our plans for after we graduated. When I said I was going to attend State University, I noticed their disappointment. I asked my favorite nun, “Why?” She answered, “That means you’ll leave four years later a communist and an atheist!”
What a giggle we girls had over that. “How ridiculously unsophisticated these nuns are,” we thought. Then I went to the university and four years later walked out a communist and an atheist, just as my sister Katie had six years before me.
Sometime later, I was a young divorcee with a small child. At the urging of my sister, I relocated to NYC after spending years married to an American executive stationed in Southeast Asia. The marriage over, I was making a new life for my daughter and me. Katie said, “Come to New York. We’re making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it.”
I hadn’t seen her for years. Although she had tormented me when we were youngsters, those memories were faint after my Asian traumas and the break-up of my marriage. I foolishly mistook her for sanctuary in a storm. With so much time and distance between us, I had forgotten her emotional instability.
And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, “Sexual Politics.”
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish.
To me, this sounded silly. I was enduring culture shock after having been cut-off from my homeland, living in Third-World countries for years with not one trip back to the United States. I was one of those people who, upon returning to American soil, fell out of the plane blubbering with ecstasy at being home in the USA. I knelt on the ground covering it with kisses. I had learned just exactly how delicious was the land of my birth and didn’t care what anyone thought because they just hadn’t seen what I had or been where I had been. I had seen factory workers and sex-slaves chained to walls.
How could they know? Asia is beyond our ken and, as they say, utterly inscrutable, and a kind of hell I never intended to revisit. I lived there, not junketed, not visited like sweet little tourists — I’d conducted households and tried to raise a child. I had outgrown the communism of my university days and was clumsily groping my way back to God.
How could twelve American women who were the most respectable types imaginable — clean and privileged graduates of esteemed institutions: Columbia, Radcliffe, Smith, Wellesley, Vassar; the uncle of one was Secretary of War under Franklin Roosevelt — plot such a thing? Most had advanced degrees and appeared cogent, bright, reasonable and good. How did these people rationally believe they could succeed with such vicious grandiosity? And why?
I dismissed it as academic-lounge air-castle-building. I continued with my new life in New York while my sister became famous publishing her books, featured on the cover of “Time Magazine.” “Time” called her “the Karl Marx of the Women’s Movement.” This was because her book laid out a course in Marxism 101 for women. Her thesis: The family is a den of slavery with the man as the Bourgeoisie and the woman and children as the Proletariat. The only hope for women’s “liberation” (communism’s favorite word for leading minions into inextricable slavery; “liberation,” and much like “collective” – please run from it, run for your life) was this new “Women’s Movement.” Her books captivated the academic classes and soon “Women’s Studies” courses were installed in colleges in a steady wave across the nation with Kate Millett books as required reading.
Imagine this: a girl of seventeen or eighteen at the kitchen table with Mom studying the syllabus for her first year of college and there’s a class called “Women’s Studies.” “Hmmm, this could be interesting,” says Mom. “Maybe you could get something out of this.”
Seems innocuous to her. How could she suspect this is a class in which her innocent daughter will be taught that her father is a villain? Her mother is a fool who allowed a man to enslave her into barbaric practices like monogamy and family life and motherhood, which is a waste of her talents. She mustn’t follow in her mother’s footsteps. That would be submitting to life as a mindless drone for some domineering man, the oppressor, who has mesmerized her with tricks like romantic love. Never be lured into this chicanery, she will be taught. Although men are no damned good, she should use them for her own orgasmic gratification; sleep with as many men as possible in order to keep herself unattached and free. There’s hardly a seventeen-year-old girl without a grudge from high school against a Jimmy or Jason who broke her heart. Boys are learning, too, and they can be careless during high school, that torment of courting dances for both sexes.
By the time Women’s Studies professors finish with your daughter, she will be a shell of the innocent girl you knew, who’s soon convinced that although she should be flopping down with every boy she fancies, she should not, by any means, get pregnant. And so, as a practitioner of promiscuity, she becomes a wizard of prevention techniques, especially abortion.
The goal of Women’s Liberation is to wear each female down to losing all empathy for boys, men or babies. The tenderest aspects of her soul are roughened into a rock pile of cynicism, where she will think nothing of murdering her baby in the warm protective nest of her little-girl womb. She will be taught that she, in order to free herself, must become an outlaw. This is only reasonable because all Western law, since Magna Carta and even before, is a concoction of the evil white man whose true purpose is to press her into slavery.
Be an outlaw! Rebel! Be defiant! (Think Madonna, Lady Gaga, Lois Lerner, Elizabeth Warren.) “All women are prostitutes,” she will be told. You’re either really smart and use sex by being promiscuous for your own pleasures and development as a full free human being “just like men” or you can be a professional prostitute, a viable business for women, which is “empowering” or you can be duped like your mother and prostitute yourself to one man exclusively whereby you fall under the heavy thumb of “the oppressor.” All wives are just “one-man whores.”
She is to be heartless in this. No sentimental stuff about courting. No empathy for either boy or baby. She has a life to live and no one is to get in her way. And if the boy or man doesn’t “get it” then no sex for him; “making love” becomes “having sex.” “I’m not ‘having sex’ with any jerk who doesn’t believe I can kill his son or daughter at my whim. He has no say in it becauseit’s my body!” (Strange logic as who has ever heard of a body with two heads, two hearts, four arms, four feet?)
There’s no end to the absurdities your young girl will be convinced to swallow. “I plan to leap from guy to guy as much as I please and no one can stop me because I’m liberated!” In other words, these people will turn your daughter into a slut with my sister’s books as instruction manuals. (“Slut is a good word. Be proud of it!”) She’ll be telling you, “I’m probably never getting married and if I do it will be after I’ve established my career,” which nowadays often means never. “I’ll keep my own name and I don’t really want kids. They’re such a bother and only get in the way.” They’ll tell her, “Don’t let any guy degrade you by allowing him to open doors for you. To be called ‘a lady’ is an insult. Chivalry is a means of ownership.”
Thus, the females, who are fundamentally the arbiters of society go on to harden their young men with such pillow-talk in the same way they’ve been hardened because, “Wow, man, I’ve gotta get laid and she won’t do it if I don’t agree to let her kill the kid if she gets knocked-up!” Oppressed? Woman has always had power. Consider the eternal paradigm: only after Eve convinced Adam to eat the fruit did mankind fall. I.e., man does anything to make woman happy, even if it’s in defiance of God. There’s power for ya! Without a decent womankind, mankind is lost. As Mae West said, “When women go wrong men go right after them!”
I’ve known women who fell for this creed in their youth who now, in their fifties and sixties, cry themselves to sleep decades of countless nights grieving for the children they’ll never have and the ones they coldly murdered because they were protecting the empty loveless futures they now live with no way of going back. “Where are my children? Where are my grandchildren?” they cry to me.
“Your sister’s books destroyed my sister’s life!” I’ve heard numerous times. “She was happily married with four kids and after she read those books, walked out on a bewildered man and didn’t look back.” The man fell into despairing rack and ruin. The children were stunted, set off their tracks, deeply harmed; the family profoundly dislocated and there was “no putting Humpty-Dumpty together again.”
Throughout the same time these women were “invading” our institutions, the character of the American woman transformed drastically from models portrayed for us by Rosalind Russell, Bette Davis, Deborah Kerr, Eve Arden, Donna Reed, Barbara Stanwyck, Claudette Colbert, Irene Dunn, Greer Garson. These were outstanding women needing no empowerment lessons and whose own personalities, as well as the characters they interpreted, were strong, resilient and clearly carved. Their voices were so different you could pick them out by that alone. We all knew Rita Hayworth’s voice. We all knew Katherine Hepburn’s voice.
I dare you to identify the voices of the cookie-cutter post-women’s-liberation types from Hollywood today. How did these “liberated” women fall into such an indistinguishable pile of mush? They all look exactly the same with few individuating characteristics and their voices sound identical, these Julies and Jessicas! My friend, Father George Rutler, calls them “the chirping fledglings of the new Dark Ages.” The character of the American woman has been distorted by this pernicious movement. From where did this foul mouthed, tattooed, outlaw creature, who murders her baby without blinking an eye and goes partying without conscience or remorse come? And, in such a short little phase in history?
Never before have we heard of so many women murdering their children: Casey Anthony killing her little Caylee and partying-hearty for weeks; Susan Smith driving her beautiful little boys into a lake, leaving them strapped in the water to die torturous deaths; that woman who drowned her fivechildren in the bathtub? “Hey, if I can kill my baby at six months of gestation why not six months post-birth, just call it late late-term abortion.”
I insist that woman always has been the arbiter of society and when those women at Lila Karp’s table in Greenwich Village set their minds to destroying the American Family by talking young women into being outlaws, perpetrators of infanticide, and haters of Western law, men and marriage, they accomplished just what they intended. Their desire — and I witnessed it at subsequent meetings till I got pretty sick of their unbridled hate — was to tear American society apart along with the family and the “Patriarchal Slave-Master,” the American husband.
We’re all so busy congratulating each other because Ronald Reagan “won the Cold War without firing a shot” entirely missing the bare truth which is that Mao, with his Little Red Book and the Soviets, won the Cold War without firing a shot by taking over our women, our young and the minds of everyone tutored by Noam Chomsky and the textbooks of Howard Zinn. Post-graduate Junior is Peter Pan trapped in the Never Neverland of Mom’s (she’s divorced now) basement. Christina Hoff Sommers says, “Moms and dads, be afraid for your sons. There’s a ‘war on men’ that started a long time ago in gender studies classes and in women’s advocacy groups eager to believe that men are toxic… Many ‘educated women’ in the U.S. have drunk from the gender feminist Kool Aid. Girls at Yale, Haverford and Swarthmore see themselves as oppressed. This is madness.”
If you see something traitorous in this, a betrayal of my sister, I have come to identify with such people as Svetlana Stalin or Juanita Castro; coming out to speak plainly about a particularly harmful member of my family. Loyalty can be highly destructive. What about Muslims who refuse to speak out right now? I was one of the silent but at last I’m “spilling the beans.” The girls have been up to something for years and it’s really not good. It’s evil. We should be sick to our souls over it. I know I am. And so, mass destruction, the inevitable outcome of all socialist/communist experiments, leaves behind its signature trail of wreckage.
So much grace, femininity and beauty lost.
So many ruined lives.
Mallory Millett resides in New York City with her husband of over twenty years. CFO for several corporations, she is a long-standing member of The David Horowitz Freedom Center and sits on the Board of Regents for the Center for Security Policy

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “Feminism Is Communism

  1. Thanks to Mallory Millet for the courage of her stand, for speaking of these truths and for sharing the heartache that she has known.
    “She opens her mouth with wisdom,
    And on her tongue is the law of kindness.” [Proverbs 31:26]

     
    • [Oooops, I clicked “Post Comment” too early and don’t know how to edit my post….]
      For those who may not recognize the Scriptural reference, it is a snippet from God’s concise description of the model woman, wife, and mother — far from being the oppressed and faceless cipher that the left would portray, God’s model woman is strong, wise, honorable, actively engaged in directing the affairs of her household, trusted by her husband, praised by her children, and respected in the community.
      No wonder such a woman is hated by the shrieking harridans of the feminist movement; she is everything that they are not.

       
  2. There is nothing feminine about feminism; it is the antithesis of everything womanly. feminism is an insidious cancer that has metastasized it’s way throughout our country and the minds of our youth. The defenses, common sense, and self-respect of our youth have been hijacked, disabled, and tossed aside by the brain-washing mantra of feminism called “woman power” in all its faded glory and political correctness. The biggest problem with feminism is having males who have decided to abrogate their responsibility for leadership and let their emotions, guilt, and females lead them instead of being the ones who lead through Christ. As a result of males refusing to lead and believing the lies about masculinity, a vacuum exists in single mother households, churches, and schools. This void has allowed homosexuality, gangs, rape, psychoses, drugs, murder, out-of-wedlock babies, suicide to fester and grow exponentially.
    Men were the breadwinners, the protectors, they taught their sons to become men and daughters to learn to respect men, read devotion after dinner and drove the family to church. Women were the lovers of their husbands, emotionally vulnerable to their husbands, the life givers, trusting of husbands, modest, nurtured the family through healthy meals and love, taught daughters how to be feminine and sons how to love. Men and women were in synchrony with one another and shared responsibilities per their defined roles. Males today have lost their desire to be God-fearing masculine protectors of women; instead, they compete with females by becoming effeminate and have learned more selfishness and ego than morals and values. They were taught to want the princess dress by their man-hating feminist “mommies” as boys and grow up psychologically warped. Females were taught as little girls to beat boys in everything and love stuffed animals, not dolls; as adults they hide femininity behind birth control pills and instead of aspiring to marriage and children, they aspire to dressing with a complete lack of modesty, whoredom, abortion, disease, and teacup dogs in place of babies. Females today believe the genders aren’t just equal (leading towards androgyny) but, females are stronger and better than males, and thus ensues female competition against males. We have played right into the trap of the devil by allowing feminism to define us for generations and in so doing we have allowed the fabric of our country, the family through Christ, to be ripped apart. feminism pits female against male, wife against husband, mother against child, nature against nurture. Where we should exist in harmony, there is constant disharmony and disunification and strife. The only way out of this contrived mess is with love and the purest of love is also the depth and breadth of our country, Jesus Christ.

     
    • Your answer is as powerful as the sister’s tale above. THAT’S the family I remember, that’s the world I grew up in, RIP Dad! This whole post relates directly to another comment line I was active in a couple days ago, and there’s a good number of women there who are like me – the SAHM. PTA and Cub Scouts Mom, the mother of 4 boys who do me proud in how they treat women, but whose heart breaks at the women they end up with, sometimes. Sweet as peaches to begin w/, turning to hard and painful as trying to swallow a snarl of barbed wire after they think they’ve caught them, (and 2 have…*sigh*) Of course, here, as well as the aforementioned comment line, they were conservative forums, let no one doubt that! WE had the upper hand and that included men who have taken back their manhood, or were lucky enough to have never had it pounded out of them. This is a beautiful post and your reply, MomofIV, worth saving for the future where girls have no choice anymore by their REAL owners – Medusas in leather and stiletto heels, gnashing their teeth w/ hate and envy – to remind them of the sweet savour of following God and his plans for all of us, men, women and children alike! Except for holdouts, Christianity and God have been banished from this world and is only further proof of how close to the end we are!

       
    • Mom, great great reply.
      And Mike this is a great post. Thanks

       
  3. Thank God! An article which is nothing but the truth!

     
  4. All that I’ve read and written tonight remind me of a Jethro Tull song, “Locomotive Breath”. You really need to hear the music to understand why the lyrics are so apt. I’ll leave a link to a YouTube video below, but please understand, if someone here doesn’t trust YouTube, that’s where you’re gonna land! I’m also slightly editing the lines here. They’re not dirty, not swear words by any means, but they are adult words and I will keep them off this site. The lyrics in full are below the video of you click on “See More” under the video pane, so you can follow along. The music makes it all, really. (And Ian Anderson’s flute solo makes it exquisite!) Jethro Tull Copyright 1971
    In the shuffling madness
    Of the locomotive breath
    Runs the all time loser
    Headlong to his death
    Oh, he feels the piston scraping
    Steam breaking on his brow
    Old Charlie stole the handle
    And the train, it won’t stop going
    No way to slow down
    Oh, oh
    He sees his children jumping off
    At stations one by one
    His woman and his best friend
    [………………..]
    Oh, he’s crawling down the corridor
    On his hands and knees
    Old Charlie stole the handle
    And the train, it won’t stop going
    No way to slow down
    Yeah, yeah
    He hears the silence howling
    And catches angels as they fall
    And the all time winner
    Has got him by the […..]
    Oh, he picks up Gideon’s Bible
    Opens at page one
    I thank God, he stole the handle
    And the train, it won’t stop going
    No way to slow down
    No way to slow down
    No way to slow down

     
  5. My question is why? These women have given me no sane reason to destroy a solid marriage and the children in the process. What is wrong with having a man support you and having a loving and stable marriage. What is wrong with him being the bread winner, no one is stopping them from having a career also. Go for it and bring excitement into the marriage.
    What is wrong having God in your lives?
    I just can’t help myself, but these women remind me of someone wanting to be important, that want company in their misery and having a secret envy.
    Maybe someone that was overlooked in school in the dating scene. Their actions being abrasive and pushy would turn off the normal guy back then.
    Maybe, they are to be pitied, because they seem pathetic.
    Count me out, I would rather have someone to share my bed, my fears, my joys, my vacations, my successes. Having a hand to grab during fear to steady me. I think I know who are the losers here. Being blessed with such a life is good, hating others that do have that life is bad.
    Sorry, couldn’t help myself.

     
    • Glenn, you post made me misty-eyed… what a beautiful declaration to a woman and wife….
      Having a hand to grab during fear to steady me…that is so touching…

       
  6. There is so much that is spot on in this article.
    Alas, it will fall on deaf ears until it is too late. You cannot convince a young girl that she is misguided in her thoughts (teenagers know it all). The combination of public indoctrination, the “war on women” movement, Hollyweird, the internet, and culture of death (Planned Parenthood) is winning.
    But we can hope that parents (note I said parents[s], which includes a father figure), can raise their girls to be proud, strong women, who can develop healthy relationships with men and respect the roles each plays in a relationship. And that takes active parenting skills to defeat the communism tactics that are alive in well in society today. Tough to do but achievable.

     
  7. Mike, thank you for posting Mallory Millet’s article. I am stunned. She put her authentic witness and understanding on a trend we’ve all been buffeted by since 1970.

     
  8. Fabulous post! It certainly explains what’s wrong with our society today. When you look around–you see the damage our universities do to young women today. Looking at my three nieces, the two that attended university are ultra liberal–the one that never had “higher education” is the most loving, wonderful mother. Sad to say, she is my favorite.

     
    • Auntie, you are so right. You can see this happening repeatedly. Our youngest went to a CC and after awhile, we had to look at each other and ask, is this the daughter we sent away to be “educated?” Sadly, in many colleges, our children aren’t being academically educated, but radically educated. They aren’t coming out smarter, but smart mouthed. These kids, our most precious thing we have, are being taken from us and being brain washed to further the agendas of those we trusted them to.
      Do over again, I think not, her three older siblings that got on the job training, have a completely different outlook on life.

       
  9. WOW – awesome post!

     
  10. Anti feminist, anti communist, anti mind control

    Admittedly, I did not even read the article and comments yet, but it is already obvious that such blatant mind control is everywhere. You are plain idiots: communist countries do not promote feminism; it is deplorable western idea. Just the same as pathological registrations everywhere and vicious demand for email address no one needs.

     
    • “I did not even read the article and comments yet, but it is already obvious that such blatant mind control is everywhere.” Wow, you are a genius mind reader!
      If you don’t like the “vicious” demand for email, take it up with WordPress…or feel free to not comment about us idiots 🙂

       
    • When you make a statement like, “Admittedly, I did not even read the article and comments yet…” It’s akin to a self-labeled admission of ignorance. What are you so afraid of?

       
  11. Pingback: The USC Sucks, etcetera: Part 7 of an Open Debate—The NAC’s Article VI & Conspiracies | LDS Anarchy

  12. Feminism is another form of devil worship.

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *