Time to DeFund Federal Dept of Ed

Rate this post

Feds Gave $669.6 Million to Wisconsin Public Schools—More Than 20 Times What Proposed State Cuts Would Save
Sunday, February 20, 2011 By Terence P. Jeffrey
(CNSNews.com) – The federal government gave $669.6 million to the public schools in Wisconsin in fiscal 2008, according to the Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). That is more than 20 times as much as the $30 million that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is trying to save in the current fiscal year by asking state employees, including teachers, to pay for a fraction of the cost of their own pension packages and health-insurance premium.
Because of this federal subsidy, taxpayers in the 49 other states make a handsome contribution to the salary and benefits packages of Wisconsin school teachers.
Fiscal 2008 is the last year for which the NCES has published the state-by-state dollar amount of federal subsidies for public schools.
Wisconsin faces a $137 million shortfall for the state’s current fiscal year, which ends June 30, and a $3.6 billion shortfall for the next two fiscal years.
To help close this budget gap, Gov. Walker, a Republican, has proposed legislation that would make state employees, including teachers, pay 5.8 percent of their salary in contributions to their pension plan and 12.6 percent of what the state pays for their insurance premiums.
The governor’s proposal would also prevent state employees’unions from engaging in collective bargaining over state workers’ benefit packages, allowing them only to bargain over wages. Also, state employees’ wages would not be allowed to increase faster than the rate of inflation (the Consumer Price Index) unless voters approved the increase in a referendum.
Teachers and other state employees and the unions that represent them have been protesting the governor’s proposals for the past week.
Gov. Walker’s proposed budget changes would save the state an estimated $30 million this year and $300 million during the next two fiscal years. But that is a pittance compared to the federal subsidies that flow annually into Wisconsin public school system.
In fiscal 2008, according to the U.S. Education Department’s National Center for Education Statistics, the federal government provided Wisconsin public schools with $669,634,777.
The $669.6 million in federal tax dollars that was directed to Wisconsin public schools in fiscal 2008 is more than 22 times as much as the $30 million that Wisconsin would save in this fiscal year from the changes proposed by Gov. Walker and more than twice as much as the $300 million the governor’s plan would save the state over the next two fiscal years.
Wisconsin spent $10,791 per pupil in its public elementary and secondary schools in fiscal year 2008, according to the NCES. That amount includes salaries and benefits for teachers, school administrators and support staff as well as other school expenses.
Wisconsin’s $10,791 per-pupil spending in its public schools was more than the $10,353 that neighboring Illinois spent; or the $10,048 that neighboring Minnesota spent; or the $9,520 that neighbor Iowa spent.
In fact, the $10,791 Wisconsin spent per pupil in its public schools in fiscal 2008 was more than was spent on public schooling by any other Midwest state, according to the NCES.
Wisconsin’s closest Midwest competitor was Nebraska, which spent $10,565 per public in its public elementary and secondary schools in fiscal 2008.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Time to DeFund Federal Dept of Ed

  1. As a veteran home-schooling mom of over 25 years, I can only fantasize about what it would be like to have even 1/4 of the amount per student to spend. Just think of the field trips!!!!!!!!!!

  2. I agree with Mr. Jeffrey. But, I would also go one step further; eliminate all government coerced funding of education. What right do I have to use the government to coerce you (steal your money from you at gun point) to fund my child’s education? I seem to recall mention somewhere, sometime in the past the admonition that “Thou shalt not steal.” I don’t recall any exception that would justify government stealing.
    I attempted to introduce an amendment to the California Constitution that would eliminate government coerced funding of education in 2010. However, due to lack of funding the effort was aborted. It did progress though the petition stage, including the mandatory publishing of the Legislative Analysts opinion as to the fiscal impact of the initiative as follows: “Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Elimination of most existing state and local government funding for education programs. Likely major shifts in state and local government budgeting.” This is exactly what was intended.
    Efforts are now being made to obtain funding for the initiative to promote it during the 2012 election cycle. If interested, one can view the petition with the initiative text at http://www.slavesforfreedom.com. Two other initiatives will be promoted as well; one providing parental protection as to determination of the curriculum for their children and the other providing tax relief for senior citizens (freedom from slavery).
    I’m glad to see Mr. Jeffrey’s article because the more this issue is raised the better our chances for ultimately eliminating government coerced funding of education; at all levels of government.

  3. Have you seen the slick new school buses that appeared after the current admin doubled the Education budget? School buses for years have been the same crackerbox on a truck chassis. The Ed budget doubles and, presto, these new 2010 taller, air-conditioned, more streamlined and lots more expensive buses start showing up in urban school districts where teachers’ unions and administrators maker scads on monney for doing zilch. Coincidence?

  4. The OBE Curriculum explained by my dear friend, Jed Brown who fought to restore traditional education in Washington State. He died of cancer in 2009. His memorial website features many of his articles.

    • When it comes to Outcomes Based Education (OBE), “outcomes” don’t mean “results” but “equality of outcomes.”

  5. this is criminal-I would like education to go back in the hands of the states. Everyone would benefit more,mainly our children. This was a move by politicians,to pocket money-plain and simple

  6. Outcomes Based Education (OBE) is based on changing the paradigm from the traditional Disciplined-Knowledge based curriculum to the new Role-based curriculum. That’s why kids can’t read, spell or do math anymore. Jed Brown explained in a radio interview in 1998 with Constance Cumbey.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *