Honolulu Chief Elections Clerk Says Obama Not Born in Hawaii

Rate this post

[Please also see an update of this post, “There Is No Birth Certificate,” HERE.]
Tim Adams was the Chief Elections Clerk for the city and county of Honolulu, Hawaii, during the 2008 presidential election. As Chief Elections Clerk, he supervised a staff of 50 and had access to all the database to verify documents like birth certificates and birth places of campaign candidates.
On June 5, 2010, Adams was interviewed by James Edwards of the Political Cesspool radio show. Adams says unequivocally:

“Barack Obama was NOT born in Hawaii.”

Adams is currently teaching in the graduate program of Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, (270) 745-0111. He’s listed, as Timothy Adams, in WKU’s faculty-staff directory, HERE. Timothy Adams is also listed as a Graduate Assistant of the English Department, HERE:

Timothy Adams
CH 20
(270) 745-5767

A big h/t to American Grand Jury & AGJ’s source, The Betrayal.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Honolulu Chief Elections Clerk Says Obama Not Born in Hawaii

  1. Smith J.
    There is a point that you miss in your dissertation. If, as you say the United States is just another corporation, then as a corporate owner I have a board of directors and I have stock holders.
    In the case of the United States, since you claim BO is the CEO then I say we the people are the stock holders and therefore we have the power to get the bum out and we have the power to fire the board of directors, (The Congress), so if as you say the acceptance of the 14th amendment nullifies my rights as a citizen then why would anyone waste their time voting?
    There is nothing in the 14th amendment nullifying my rights as a citizen. My rights as a citizen are there and the Congress along with Obama don’t like it one bit. They’re chomping at the bit to figure out a way to void the Constitution and remove my constitutional rights. There is a problem. Obama and the Congress know that they have to break the law to accomplish their mission. That would be a huge mistake on the part of a hired government. They can and will be fired in November and after this economy falls apart in Jan. 2011 Obama will be toast..

  2. Why is it that Obama can get away with not showing a birth certificate, (amongst other things) while the American public is under a magnifying glass 24/7? Although I don’t believe in violence other then to protect myself or my family, I won’t shed a tear if that man, ( I refuse to call him my president) meets his demise. I don’t want to see him assassanated, but I want to see him stripped of his power that he daily abuses. Remember, he is a father/husband, & a human being. Just because he’s an idiot, doesn’t mean that gives the right for someone to kill him. THOU SHALT NOT KILL! Deport yes, kill no.

  3. Pingback: Top Posts — WordPress.com

  4. Eo,
    I think there was a nut-case that suggested Obama be done in but I admonished him—the last thing we need is some nut case taking him out. That would leave us in a real pickle. Biden would be president. The man has no testicles and Pelosi would have more power than ever. No — Let’s get the bum outta office the legal way.

  5. So if a US citizen, who is pregnant, goes to a foreign country, and gives birth there: then her baby will be an illegal immigrant if she brings it back into the US?
    just wondering
    I still have seen no proof that Stanley Ann took a plane trip or a boat trip or whatever, to Kenya or anywhere else.
    Also, why did the Grandparents post a notice of the birth in the local paper where they lived in Hawaii? It can be found somewhere, it does exist and was published back in 1961

    • Hank, regarding your first question…I know two natural born US citizens that were living in Norway and had a child there. The child ends up w/dual citizenship from US/Norway. The parents had to take the child, birth certificate, and their US passports to the US Embassy in Norway to get a passport for their child in order to bring the baby back to the US.

  6. Hank,
    According to the Constitution the Congress has the authority to declare the definition of citizenship. The big question about the legitimacy of Osama Obama has been the timing of the law established by Congress in 2001 and then restated in 2010. The question is not whether his mother went to Kenya or not, this is a known fact. She was seventeen at the time.
    Did she in fact give birth to a son in Kenya at that time. This fact is still disputed. The birth records used to support the validity of his birth was a website. The big question here is –Does it matter?’
    n 1961, the year that Barack Obama was born, under Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Ann Dunham could not transmit citizenship of any kind to Barack Obama. This was changed in 1994. However, he could NEVER obtain “natural born” citizenship.
    Herein lies a problem. According to an article I just read–The constitution does not define natural born citizens. This is where everything gets muddy. Our current Congress cannot make Obama a natural born citizen retroactively and the Constitution does not differentiate between citizen and natural born citizen.
    I took a great deal of law in College but will admit this is one for the courts to decide.
    My personal opinion—It is not a point that will ever get him out of office. There’s too much rhetoric confusing the issues. If it ever got decided it would have to be at the Supreme Court level. I do not see it going there. I realize this does not answer the questions on the blog but for my personal satisfaction I do not see this issue going anywhere.
    However, I have been wrong many times in the past.

  7. Pingback: v human target chuck fringe dvd dates / today « Within This Shell

  8. Eo,
    I get all my info from someone else. I believe most of this came from an email from Steve from the following individual–(From: Sol W. Sanders
    Subject: Fw: the law of it according to..
    To: “sws”
    Date: Thursday, June 10, 2010, 10:57 AM.)
    However, since the ideas re not really all mine and all the info. came via Steve’s email and from Cornell University law school, some even from you, I think the post should somehow include that.
    Personally, anything I say that has any importance always surprises me, especially if I’m the originator of it.
    You always have permission to use my stuff, as long as people understand that I am the world’s best plagiarist.

  9. I didn’t know, but then the entire idea was not mine. I appreciate you working on giving me credit but see, when it comes down to it, you and Steve along with your friend are the real geniuses in this game.
    Luv ya bunches.

    • Ron,
      You were the one who first alerted me to USC 8 Sec 1401(g)! Modesty does not become you. Hahahahaha
      Love ya bunches too! 😀

  10. Eo,
    If you really knew me, you wouldn’t waste your time. I am a bundle of misconceptions and a mass of inconsistencies. I suffer from the now well known disease called ADD. Funny, I didn’t know I had that disease until someone defined it and it fit my personality. Now I know why I’m up all night writing, composing, playing my piano, painting,etc,etc… it also explains why I have owned twelve businesses in my life, everyone of them in a different unassociated field of endeavor.
    I will say this..I have been successful at everything I’ve ever attempted , except my first two marriages–but that wasn’t my fault. My wives were eccentric and didn’t understand my delicate nature.

  11. hahahah ron baby!

  12. Emmett Freeman

    So, if the people on this board was in Russia and their wife was pregnant and had a child, then their child would not be American, but Russian, or English, French or whatever country you were in. You people are stupid and racist.

    • Ah, “Troll Power!” on the loose, I see. Ad hominem attacks don’t rank very highly on the hierachy of arguments.

      • P.S. At least, if you’re going to be denigrating the arguer, could you put some creativity and effort into it? Clever insults are memorable and/or amusing, you know.

  13. russell collins

    The world is being prepared for a new world order.
    the things that are happening around us are not aimless, everything is calculated to get the proper reation from the world, we will willingly give up our liberty and security. we will be tagged like animals. Our president is the least of
    our worries. remember your history lessons. as the world get more populous the more resources your need, and if you dont have you take from next weakest country near you, you began a quest of domination, its survival of a civilization.
    our fresh water supply is getting very low. Watch out!

  14. Boy Emmett,
    Them be fightin words. Freeman sounds English—I hate the English…Russians never get women pregnant –they’e in too big of a hurry. I’m not racist–I’ve only be in one race and the black guy won. What the hell are you talkin ’bout anyway????

  15. Well, Russel
    You seem to be all over the board…Or I’m just slow today….Let’s see—New world order
    Give up security and liberty
    As the world get more populous????
    What the hell does that mean??
    Take from next weakest country near you???
    You began a quest of domination???
    What the hell is that???
    Why is it people who come on this blog either can not speak English or they butcher the language so badly that no one can understand them?
    Russell, You and Emmett need to go back to school and learn something, then maybe you can communicate with adults.
    Otherwise, stay in your closets and do whatever it is you do when you’re in the dark.

  16. So, Ron Baby, in the following you say:
    n 1961, the year that Barack Obama was born, under Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Ann Dunham could not transmit citizenship of any kind to Barack Obama. This was changed in 1994. However, he could NEVER obtain “natural born” citizenship
    Are you referring to her husband, Barack Obama, or her son, Barack obama: because if the latter I believe she could transfer citizenship to him… even if she was in a foreign country at the time of his birth, which has not been proven to ME

  17. here is a great revelation I just found out about!!!
    DNC Top Executive “John” :
    Date: October 12, 2008 @ 2:23 am
    Dear American People,
    Hello. I will not be giving you my real information, as it needs to remain secret – at least until after our plan is enacted. I am a Top Executive at the Democratic National Committee. I can tell you this. What you have have been suspecting is true – Barack Obama was not actually born in Hawaii. The document that we have provided him to show as his birth certificate is not authentic; it was created in our experimental laboratories at the DNC’s World Headquarters in Saudi Arabia. This experimental lab – and, this may be quite shocking – this lab is where Barack Obama himself was also created, almost 48 years ago, as part of PROJECT FLAGBURN.
    Yes, we had been trying for years, using the latest technology, to create the perfect candidate to enforce our liberal agenda. In the fall of 1960, we were finally successful, in our ninth try, in using recombinant DNA and artificial insemination to inject our carefully-crafted genetic material into an electronic womb (by bubbling Argon gas through radioactive stem cells). As the BARACK9 grew, we fed it nutrients infused with “Memory Cells” culled from the brainstems of famous left-wingers such as Adlai Stevenson, Bertrand Russell, and Ambrose Bierce – guaranteed to transmit our policies and doctrines into its growing brain. We radioactively stimulated the liberal centers of the brain and implanted radio-controlled microchips into its cerebellum.
    Here at the DNC, we detest nationalism, pride, the Christian religion, and our troops. We have decided that a hybrid of Communism and Islam would be a much better system for our country. As BARACK9 grew up, we taught it to have these values as well. When the time was right, we entered it into politics, controlling its brain with our “Brain-Control Device”. We also were responsible for 9/11, the financial crisis, and other key events to ensure that George Bush has a low approval rating. Now, the time has come. Soon BARACK9 will be voted in as the head of the most powerful country on earth. You will soon have a President named Barack Hussein Obama, and there is nothing you can do to stop it. As his first act, Barack Obama will issue the following executive orders:
    1. All flags will be replaced with pictures of Barack Obama’s face
    2. All personal property and land of registered Republicans will be forfeit to the state
    3. All churches, pictures of Jesus Christ, and religious iconography will be destroyed immediately. All mentions of the Christian religion will be punished by death
    4. Everybody must wear a turban at all times and pray to Mecca 12 times a day
    5. Arabic will now be the official United States language
    6. The country will be renamed to The Islamic Communist Republic of Ameristan
    7. All white people must issue public apologies to minorities for former misdeeds of their race. The jobs and money of Whites will be offered to blacks, muslims, and atheists as punishment.
    8. White women will be offered as brides to black muslim men who get first priority of choosing up to ten wives. Whites will be put into forced labor camps for one year to show them what slavery was like
    9. All heterosexuals must issue public apologies to gays and lesbians. In order to increase sensitivity to homosexual issues, they will be incarcerated for one month with a homosexual member of the same sex who is allowed to use them as seen fit.
    10. Republicans will be branded with a R on their forehead and must kiss the buttocks of a liberal whenever requested to do so
    I am only divulging this because there is nothing which can be done about it at this point. We initially saw Sarah Palin as an immense threat to our cause, but we have launched a huge and successful disinformational smear campaign against her which has neutralized her influences.
    Prepare for your new leadership to begin on January 20!
    DNC Top Executive “John”

    • Congratulations, Hank! You just spent oodles of your time demonstrating to all of us that you are a mind-numbed Obamabot.

  18. The problem comes down to the validity of Obama’s parent’s marriage. When he was 18, Barack Obama Sr. Married a woman named Kezia who he had 4 children with. When he left Kenya for the United States he did not obtain a divorce. In the US polygamy is illegal. If a person is already married, regardless of where they got married, any subsequent marriage that takes place in the United States in invalid. This is the case with the marriage of Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. in Hawaii, February 1961. Obama was born out of wedlock. As a child born out of wedlock a different law applies if he was born outside the United States. The law reads:
    7 FAM 1133.4-3 Birth Out of Wedlock to American Mother
    (TL:CON-68; 04-01-1998)
    a. Claims Under Section 309(c) INA: A child born abroad out of wedlock
    or after December 24, 1952, to a U.S. citizen mother acquires U.S.
    citizenship if the mother was physically present continuously for 1
    the United States or its outlying possessions at any time prior to the
    child’s birth. This did not change under any of the amendments to
    Section 309 INA. Thus a woman who had spent only a very short time
    every year outside the United States would be unable to transmit
    citizenship under section 309(c) INA even though she might have
    qualified to transmit U.S. citizenship under section 301(g) INA if she
    been married to the father of the child. The 1966 amendment to section
    301 INA allowing members of the U.S. armed forces, employees of the
    U.S. Government and certain international organizations, and their
    dependents to count certain periods outside the United States as U.S.
    physical presence does not apply to section 309(c) INA. For this
    the mother of a child born out of wedlock cannot use time spent abroad
    as a military dependent, for example, to satisfy all or part of the
    requirement of continuous physical presence in the United States for 1
    year. Subsequent legitimation or the establishment of a legal
    between an alien father and a person who acquired U.S. citizenship at
    birth under section 309(c) does not alter that person’s citizenship.
    There is no doubt that Stanley Ann Dunham spent more than one continuous year inside the United States. Her citizenship was automatically transmitted to Obama Upon his birth through Jus Sanguinis. Some would argue that being born abroad prevents you from being a natural born citizen. But there are 2 precedent cases of Presidential candidates being born abroad. John McCain and George Romney. McCain supporters argue that he is a citizen because he was born on a US military base. This is a misconception, He is a citizen because his parents were citizens. Citizenship is not granted by being born on a military base. State Department policy reads:
    “Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of birth.”
    A similar situation occurred with Mitt Romney’s dead father. George Romney was born in Mexico in 1907. He did not move to the United States until his family fled from the Mexican revolution in 1910. Yet in 1968 George Romney ran for president. George Romney was eligible to run because he inherited his citizenship through Jus sanguinis.
    The third point argues that Obama lost his US citizenship because he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro. Dual citizenship only became recognized in Indonesia in 2006. Before 2006 the Indonesia Nationality act of 1958 applied.
    Stanley Ann Dunham never became an Indonesian citizen.
    An alien wife of an Indonesian national is entitled to Indonesian
    citizenship if she so wishes and makes a statement to that effect
    within a year of the marriage.
    If Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama he did not gain nationality because he was 6 years old.
    A five year old child, who is adopted by foster parents of
    Indonesian nationality, shall qualify for Indonesian nationality
    if the foster parents apply to a court to legitimize the adoption
    within one year and request is granted.
    Obama would have had to meet all of the following conditions to obtain Indonesian nationality:
    1. Have reached the age of 21 or over;
    2. Were born in Indonesia or have lived in Indonesia continuously for 5 years, or interruptedly for 10 years;
    3. Have a fair command of the Indonesian language and knowledge of Indonesian history, and have never been convicted by a court for a breach of law or for any act against Indonesia;
    4. Have the consent of the wife/husband;
    5. Are mentally and physically healthy;
    6. Pay a fee of not less than Rp 500 and not more than Rp 10,000, which shall be decided by the court, taking into consideration the applicant’s income;
    7. Have permanent employment;
    8. Have no other nationality or have abandoned his/her nationality which is in conformity with an agreement on dual nationality reached between Indonesia and the foreign country.
    Obama did not meet condition 1, 2, 6, 7, or 8 while living in Indonesia. Obama is absolutely a natural born citizen and eligible to seek the presidency.

  19. Hank,
    You are not telling us anything we haven’t already researched.
    This has been hashed out and over many times. The Congress of the United States is not going to listen to our arguments until we get a Congress that does not believe him a god. Until that time all the laws and rules we come up with are meaningless. Our purpose here is to show everyone what a fraud he really is.
    It’s fuel for the fire. Or as Steve says,”…Another nail in the coffin…”

  20. Eo,
    I love you—Don’t give up on me—I have a delicate nature and I can’t stand rejection…That’s why I write non-controversial books lie ‘Liberal Ignorance.’

  21. Next he will be outed as a clone of some Egyptian
    ruler or something…….wait, that’s been tried already too. Bottom line is the man is a fraud, we all know it, even the obamabots know it. This is why they vigorously fall all over themselves to try and defend the rotten S.O.B.

  22. If the Parliament itself resolves that it should be dissolved, with at least two-thirds of the Members (ie. 86 Members) voting in favour, the Presiding Officer proposes a date for an extraordinary general election and the Parliament is dissolved by the monarch by royal proclamation. In the current Parliament, elected in 2007, this can only happen if supported by the Scottish National Party as it has more than one-third of the Members (47 out of 129 Members equals 36.4%) and can therefore block a dissolution resolution unless 4 of its Members were to join with all opposition members to pass a dissolution resolution.

    • This thread has nothing to do with Scottish election. You also posted 2 other similar comments that went straight into our Spam box. Get your own blog and you can post all about Scottish election to your heart’s content!

  23. Scottish Election,
    Do we have a Parliament???


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.