Eat a lot of fish? Washington State is going to find a way to make you pay for that!

Inslee shakes hands with fellow environmental alarmist ManBearPig

Inslee shakes hands with fellow environmental alarmist ManBearPig


MyNorthwest.com (Dave Boze Show): Who doesn’t like fish and chips or the occasional salmon filet?
There’s just something wonderful about fish especially here in the Pacific Northwest. In fact, whenever friends come up to visit we always make sure they enjoy some seafood, because that is what you should have in this kind of locale.
However ask yourself: How much fish do you eat a month?
The reason that is relevant is the Department of Ecology sets water quality standards based on the assumptions of how much fish people consume per month. Right now, the state estimates the average person eats about a half a pound of fish a month. They say that that might be light. I’m not so sure.
We’re talking about the average person in Washington state. I probably have fish maybe four or five times a month, so it’s probably light for me. But I know people who have fish once a month tops, and they’re not having more than 4 ounces.
But what they want to do is change the estimate to around 12 pounds a month. That is Gov. Jay Inslee’s idea.
You might think, who cares, let them do it. But I was speaking to the Washington Policy Center this morning and they were telling me with Inslee’s idea of pushing the 12 pounds of fish a month, what that would require is new environmental standards for water quality. They said it would dramatically increase your sewage cost because sewage treatment facilities would have to find technologies that would vastly improve their ability to clean water.
There’s not even the technology to get it clean enough to actually fulfill the obligations that would be required under this 12-pound-a-month presumption. The estimate from the Washington Policy Center is that it could increase a sewer bill from about $35 a month to about $230 a month.
“As you can imagine, changing our fish consumption rate from a half-a-pound a month to 12 pounds a month, that is quite a dramatic increase by any measure,” says Erin Shannon with the Washington Policy Center. “So the corresponding clean water standards that that will trigger are simply – absurd is one word – but it’s going to have a dramatic impact on everyone in the state.”
Apparently, Oregon has adopted this standard, but they haven’t been able to implement it yet because the technology doesn’t exist. Now that treatment facilities need to get new permitting, they’re not allowing the new permitting until they come up with the new treatments, but they can’t come up with the new treatments because they don’t exist yet.
So Washington wants to follow this because basically Inslee thinks of himself as a hybrid of Al Gore and President Obama. You look at his book, “Apollo’s Fire,” he’s kind of following the Al Gore environmental alarmism. Then he’s trying to follow the executive style of President Obama, governed by regulation, if you can’t get it through the legislative branch because it’s divided government there, push through whatever you can and see what sticks.
So Inslee is pushing here for this 12-pound-a-month fish consumption rate. I’m trying to think if it’s even possible to eat 12 pounds of fish a month. People don’t eat three pounds of fish a week. People would get tired of it.
Boeing even entered the discussion. They’ve warned that this could have unintended consequences for continued Boeing production in the state because of the potential for millions of dollars of extra payout. Boeing spokeswoman Megan Hilfer told The Seattle Times: “We support a water quality standard that protects human health and the environment, while at the same time, allows for the growth of our business and the state’s economy.”
The Seattle Times reports Gov. Inslee and the Department of Ecology are expected to announce the new proposed standard Wednesday.
There’s going to be a public comment period, and this would be finalized only with approval of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. But let’s face it, they’ve been seeking to approve any new regulation they can for awhile.
So at this point, I look at this and I think this is yet another way of government trying to find a way, in the name of protecting us, of making everything more expensive. At some point I think we need to say no to these kinds of thing.
The politicians have something in common with this swine...

The politicians have something in common with this swine…


DCG
 

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “Eat a lot of fish? Washington State is going to find a way to make you pay for that!

  1. Reblogged this on Liberalism is Trust Fucked with Prudence. Conservatism is Distrust Tainted with Fear and commented:
    Politicians have something in common with swine: eat more fish
    where? how? whose? and at what cost?

     
  2. DCG, now don’t you know that the WA gubment needs more money to pay for their environmental anti dog poop video. It only cost WA taxpayers $27,000!
    http://www.progressivestoday.com/yo-dog-dropped-a-deuce-state-enviro-agency-spent-27000-on-anti-dog-poop-music-video/

     
  3. Washington state once again shoots itself in the foot.

     
  4. Un-freakin believable! No one, except Native peoples, eat 12 pounds of fish a month. There are to many of us who like chicken, beef, and pork. No one is going to change that habit–unless prices make it untenable. But, have you looked at the price of a salmon–that why people make other choices! This is stupid beyond belief!

     
  5. Stop complaining, everyone, just eat your cesium and strontium and shut up.

     
    • Indeed, marblenecltr! I think Inslee is trying to hide the fact that the Pac NW, all of the Pacific Coast, is in deep trouble with their seafood. Most mainstream pubs either won’t cover it or they outright lie, saying there is nothing wrong with the water OR nothing wrong yet. http://www.globalresearch.ca/fukushima-the-ticking-nuclear-bomb-over-800-tons-of-radioactive-material-pouring-into-pacific-ocean/5356276
      Don’t eat any seafood from the Gulf of Mexico, either, because of the oil dispersant they used.

       
      • Thanks for the warning about Gulf of Mexico seafood. Rotten British Petroleum ruining our Gulf Coast and having the Admiral of our Coast Guard tell us that he works for them and BP ordered Americans off our own beaches. I don’t really want to see it happen, but if Brit royals are put down by Muslims, karma will have been involved. The royals don’t seem to know or care what is happening to their own people, “culling” them, I guess. Meanwhile, Louisiana culinary gifts to the world are being altered. Also, this is a Biblical fulfillment of prophecy taking place, no life in the oceans.

         
  6. Sounds like a ploy cooked up by the enviro-commies to screw taxpayers out of even more money.
    LOL – Heck, I don’t eat twelve pounds of meat a month.
    -And I have four Webers out back.
    -Dave

     
  7. Inslee HAS to be a California Reject-nobody from the Free World could think this way….

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *