Democrats resort to secret informants against President Trump & SCOTUS nominee Judge Kavanaugh

Rate this post

A characteristic feature of totalitarian one-party dictatorships is the party’s use of a powerful tool against citizens — informants. The identities of the informants are secret; nor can the information they provide be verified or disputed.

The Soviet Union, East Germany, Maoist China all made use of secret informants against not just political dissidents, but any and every one. After the Berlin Wall separating West from East Germany came down in 1989, bringing to an end the communist East German regime, officers of the regime’s formidable Stasi secret police tried to destroy their files. But the files were saved by ordinary East German citizens who stormed the Stasi offices in Erfurt to protect the documents.

Beginning in 1992, the Stasi documents were made available to the general public who finally could view the hitherto-secret files on themselves. They were shocked to discover that colleagues, friends and family members had been secret informants. In total, the Stasi’s network of informants numbered one in every 90 East German citizens.

In July, the editorial board of America’s supposed premier newspaper The New York Times openly called on Democrats to go to war against President Trump by deploying mafia “Godfather” tactics. Recent events show that using secret informants is one of the tactics.

On Sept. 5, 2018, the despicable New York Times published an op/ed by an anonymous author who claims to be a senior official inside the Trump administration but part of the anti-Trump “Resistance”. The author claims not to be the only one — that “many of the senior officials” in the administration “are working diligently from within to frustrate” the President’s “agenda and his worst inclinations” in order “to preserve our democratic institutions”.

If you haven’t already read the op/ed, you can read it on Information Clearing House instead of on the click-baiting NYT.

Speculations are rife as to the identify of the anonymous author of the op/ed, the most credible and compelling of which is by former Assistant Secretary of the Reagan administration’s Treasury Department Dr. Paul Craig Roberts. A day after the publication of the NYT op/ed, Dr. Roberts posted an article on his blog stating that:

I know who wrote the anonymous “senior Trump official” op-ed in the New York Times. The New York Times wrote it.

The op-ed is an obvious forgery. As a former senior official in a presidential administration, I can state with certainty that no senior official would express disagreement anonymously. Anonymous dissent has no credibility. Moreover, the dishonor of it undermines the character of the writer. A real dissenter would use his reputation and the status of his high position to lend weight to his dissent.

The New York Times’ claim to have vetted the writer also lacks credibility, as the New York Times has consistently printed extreme accusations against Trump and against Vladimir Putin without supplying a bit of evidence. The New York Times has consistently misrepresented unsubstantiated allegations as proven fact. There is no reason whatsoever to believe the New York Times about anything.

Nine days after the publication of the NYT op/ed, it appears that this latest attempt by Demonrats to bring down President Trump has fizzled. And so Demonrats have deployed the Stasi secret-informant weapon against a new target — Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

Kavanaugh’s nomination had been scheduled for a vote yesterday morning in the Senate Judiciary Committee. At the last minute, however, Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee whose personal driver of 20 years is a Chinese spy, threw a wrench in the schedule by forwarding an anonymously-written letter to the Justice Department which accuses Judge Kavanaugh of unspecified “sexual misconduct” with an unnamed woman when they were both high school students. Kavanaugh is 53 years old, which means the alleged sexual misconduct took place (if it did) at least 35 years ago.

Bob Fredericks reports for the New York Post, Sept. 13, 2018, that Feinstein  said the information came from a woman who wanted to remain anonymous, and declined to detail the letter’s contents — even to fellow Democrats.

Feinstein would only say this in a statement:

I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities.

The information came in a letter that allegedly was first sent to the office of California Democratic Rep. Anna Eshoo, who allegedly passed it along to Feinstein during the summer. It is unclear why Feinstein waited until now to pass the letter to the Justice Department.

The anonymous woman making the claims is being represented by Debra Katz, a lawyer who works with #MeToo “survivors”. Joseph Abboud, a lawyer at Katz’s firm, said the firm declines to comment.

The White House issued a furious response, pointing the finger at Sen. Chuck Schumer in a statement:

Senator Schumer promised to ‘oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have,’ and it appears he is delivering with this 11th hour attempt to delay his confirmation.

Throughout 25 years of public service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has thoroughly and repeatedly vetted Judge Kavanaugh, dating back to 1993, for some of the most highly sensitive roles.

Kavanaugh attended Georgetown Preparatory School, an all-boys’ Jesuit high school in Maryland. It is not known what school the anonymous letter writer attended.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley’s office said the secret-informant letter would not throw a wrench into the confirmation process:

Sen Grassley is aware of Sen Feinstein’s referral. At this time, he has not seen the letter in question, and is respecting the request for confidentiality. There’s no plan to change the [committee’s] consideration of Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination.


Daily Wire just reported that the FBI has declined to investigate Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh over allegations sent to them by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). Take that, Feinstein!

Update #2:

A day after Dianne “my driver is a Chinese spy” Feinstein forwarded the anonymously-authored letter to the Justice Dept., 65 women who went to high school with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh have written a letter to Dianne Feinstein and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, testifying to Judge Kavanaugh’s character. From their collective letter (Townhall):

We are women who have known Brett Kavanaugh for more than 35 years and knew him while he attended high school between 1979 and 1983. For the entire time we have known Brett Kavanaugh, he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect. We strongly believe it is important to convey this information to the Committee at this time,” the letter states. “Brett attended Georgetown Prep, an all-boys high school in Rockville, Maryland. He was an outstanding student and athlete with a wide circle of friends. Almost all of us attended all girls high schools in the area. We knew Brett well through social events, sports, church, and various other activities. Many of us have remained close friends with him and his family over the years.

Through the more than 35 years we have known him, Brett has stood out for his friendship, character, and integrity. In particular, he has always treated women with decency and respect. That was true when he was in high school, and it has remained true to this day,” the letter continues. “The signers of this letter hold a broad range of political views. Many of us are not lawyers, but we know Brett Kavanaugh as a person. And he has always been a good person.

H/t FOTM reader EddieBG


Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

25 responses to “Democrats resort to secret informants against President Trump & SCOTUS nominee Judge Kavanaugh

  1. Why should anybody believe, much less give credence to, an anonymous accuser. And from 3 or more decades ago. Who believes The NYT anyway? Like everything the loony left spouts. It’s a nothing burger.

  2. I am certainly glad you are doing a follow up on this. None of it makes a drop of sense. Why send it to a California person since the “crime” happened elsewhere? I give this zero credibility knowing most likely who is behind this.
    If you are so proud of your story, why not sign your name? With proof. If something did happen, it could have been totally innocent and between two consenting of age people. Was this a spurned person? Going to an all boys school makes this even harder to believe. Why wait for so many decades to tell this “story?” If this was written by someone else why are you exposing someone else’s story? I think this is just another sad attempt to disgrace a fine man and place stress on his marriage. Shame on these people. The left does this so often, it becomes mundane.

  3. This is why the Democrats/Leftists will win in the end. Why? Because they do WHATEVER they have to do to win. They’re ruthless and relentless. They fight by fair means and foul, and they keep on keepin’ on until they achieve victory. They follow the Al Davis philosophy of victory: just win, baby! And win they do. We’re fighting them with 20 oz. gloves while they wail on us with brass knuckles…

    Exhibit A is Obamacare. How long had the Dems worked on passing something like that, decades at least? Or what about their plan for one party rule where they change the demographic makeup of America? They’ve already flipped CA; yes, CA, that once reliable bastion of Republicanism that once gave us Ronald Reagan, is now reliably Democrat with its 55 electoral votes. They’re on the verge of flipping TX and FL; once they do that, they’ll have a lock on the presidency and a probable majority of the House and Senate. You want to see your future? Look no farther than CA, folks!

    You know, a part of me wishes I could be a Democrat/Leftist. I can’t, of course, because I’m a logical person without a mental disorder; plus, leftism has failed everywhere it’s ever been tried. That said, I wish I could be one of them, because they PLAY TO WIN! I’m sick and tired of being on the losing side all the time…

    • MarkyMark, I get what you are saying completely. But you must understand that (((They))) have been playing Hegelian Dialectics with us. Fake Liberal Globalist Neocon Right vs Kalergist Liberal Globalist Left. That’s why the Neocons made sure to box out Pat Buchanan in 92,& 96, because he was NOT a Neocon. He was Trump more than 20 years previous. If only the American people had wisened up earlier. (yes we can argue it goes further back)

      • Points well taken. Pat Buchanan was sounding the alarm 20 years ago WRT immigration; I read both of his books, and he was spot on.

        Speaking of globalists, what about George W Bush NOT raising funds for Ted Cruz in his senate reelection effort? On one hand, GWB says we must keep Congress in Republican hands; then he turns around and refuses to HELP someone trying to do that!

        Now, I’m not totally sold on Cruz; for a lot of reasons I’m not sold on him, not the least of which he used to work for GWB. That said, GWB’s refusal to fund raise for Cruz’ run against O’Rourke is quite telling…

        Yes, the globalists have been using the Hegelian Dialectic for decades…

        What I can’t understand is the useful idiots who are GUNG HO for leftism. How can they be more committed to a faulty ideology than we can to what is right, both literally and figuratively?

  4. Richard Daugherty

    The so-called Dems need to completely implode and start anew.

  5. What a dishonor to have this (left wing) old woman occupy a seat in the US Senate, how perverse she is to accept an anonymous letter from someone so malicious to disclose some questionable sexual misconduct of 35 years ago? What a brilliant memory this unnamed woman has to recount that instance. How are we to know if she stimulated the young male to make the alleged advance? Oh, yes, are there any disclosures to be made of Feinstein’s intents having a spy drive her around for 20 years.

    • My personal belief is the chinese spy was planted when the Clinton Administration & Democrat Campaign Finance Committee “Colluded” & “Election Meddled” and committed Treason (which Clinton should really have been impeached for) in regards to the 1996 elections with Communist China. The DNC “conspired” with a foreign government, Communist China, against the people of the United States which is treason and is a capital offense meriting capital punishment

  6. We’re supposed to believe the words of a news rag that lies 24/7, and twists and distorts every single word the President says? The same news rag that won’t report one word about Dianne Feinstein having a Chinese spy working for her for more than 20 years. NO!

    What the Rosenbergs were executed for in the 1950s is child’s play compared to what Feinstein, Schumer, Pelosi, the Clintons, Obama, Holder, etal. are guilty of. Sometimes, that type of punishment is the only thing that will deter these traitors to the United States.

    The Senate needs to just hold the confirmation vote for Judge Kavanaugh and be done with it. The Demonrat’s antics won’t stop until then.

  7. According to various sources like Dr Beter, Brother Nathaniel etc, loads of satanic Christian hating Bolsheviks invaded the US & other Western White Christian nations under the guise of “Religious Persecution” (Red Diaper Babies), and slowly took power in media,foundations, government, & education, where they morphed into the Kalergist Cultural Marxist and turned the USA into the USSA.

  8. Weinstein raped women; Feinstein rapes the truth and decency.

    Both are pigs.

  9. It’s disgraceful what the demorats have done. Feinstein should be embarrassed yet we know she won’t be.

  10. John Adams from the Dead White Guys Club had an opinion about such things.

    We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other.

    That would call for the removal of most of the house/senate. When can we get started?

  11. “Kavanaugh’s nomination had been scheduled for a vote yesterday morning in the Senate Judiciary Committee. ”

    Yes it was, and it should have gone on as planned. Where is the Republican’s backbone? Chairman Grassle should have demanded to see the letter and the name of the alleged victim. When Feinstein refused, as she surely would have done, Grassle then should have said, “Pound sand, Diane.”

    There was no reason to delay the vote. I, for one, am tired of the Republican Party taking the “high road.” I would like to see the Republicans bring a knife to this dog fight. But they won’t.

    • Hear, hear! I too would like to see us bring a knife to the dog fight too; better yet, make it a Tommy Gun or an Uzi! Just for once, I’d like to see the Republicans show some MANHOOD and fight…

  12. Notice no one has ever come forward or even admitted they had relations with Hillary, Feinstein or Pelosi? Not even played ‘doctor’ with them.

  13. Feinstein makes me sick. She knows perfectly well that, even if he had actually raped a girl in high school, the statute of limitations has long since run out. What’s this “referral to the Just-Us dept.”?

    Hell, you can’t get Sessions excited about any Obongonaut. He’d rather chase hemp.

    They have vetted everything about this guy’s life. Now they’re going for rumors and innuendo. They should look into Feinstein’s career and her hubby’s “success” at the public trough.

    They are this bad when they are out of power. Can you imagine what they’ll be like if they get more seats? They are going to have to coin a new word for their level of corruption. The existing ones don’t do it justice.

  14. Another closely related, but unaddressed issue of major importance is covered in the article from which the following excepts were taken. We know that President Trump, Dr. E., and FOTM, and all of us here, as well as all informed Americans, will relate to this major issue.

    “The New Iron Curtain of Censorship Descends on America”

    [Skip on this longer article]

    “In that same speech, Churchill noted: “In the United States where Communism is in its infancy, the Communist parties or fifth columns constitute a growing challenge.” Today, we are threatened with our own iron curtain, the product of the descendants and dupes of that fifth column. A curtain of censorship steadily is descending on America.

    Curiously, the Constitution doesn’t specifically protect us. Here’s the wording of the First Amendment: [At the link]

    Yep, that’s it. That’s the whole thing. Meanwhile, private companies, individuals, George Soros-sponsored groups, and newspapers are free to silence anyone they don’t like and can get away with.

    If we are to remain free, we must defend ourselves from the destruction of what Americans regard as our most basic freedom by giant electronic social media companies who control significant portions of the channels of communications among Americans.

    A recent study shows that Facebook has eliminated 93% of traffic to top conservative websites. The Gateway Pundit reports that just two top conservative publishers lost 1.5 billion page views since the 2016 election. This doesn’t include hundreds of other internet publishers. This is important because not only does this hurt these publishers financially, but it means that millions of Americans who would have had a chance to read the material were blocked from seeing it.

    The concept of “their platform, their rules” needs to be aggressively breached. Facebook, Google, YouTube, and Twitter are huge and essentially have no competition. They represent the Standard Oil of the internet age. Standard Oil was broken up because it was a monopoly and was harming the free market. These giant media companies have become enormous de facto utilities. I personally hate the idea of regulation, but in this case, it’s clear that the American public must have some sort of bipartisan oversight capability and protection from these social media monopolies. Congress must provide that. The only time it can be accomplished is when there are Republican majorities in both houses.

    Political censorship has also crept into businesses intimidated by the left. MasterCard denied service to David Horowitz’s Freedom Center as a “hate group” (subsequently reversed after an outcry on conservative media). Robert Spencer was forced off the funding platform Patreon by MasterCard. Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and others have faced efforts to chase off their advertisers. Commentator Alex Jones and his Infowars have been banned from YouTube. Facebook blocked Pamela Geller’s feed and articles, suspended her posting privileges, and deleted a number of her pages.

    There is nothing in the Constitution that can protect us from the death of free speech and left-wing activism in our education system. In classrooms, faculty meetings, and university auditoriums, the same people who once were the dissenters have now become the enforcers. It turns out that the counter-cultural liberal forces of “free speech” in the 1960s were really just interested in power and control over others. They have shamelessly used any tool from Jefferson to Alinsky to get them.”

    The article continues in it’s entirety here:

    • Thanks Flanders. When communism comes to America, it will come under the guise of Liberalism

      • That’s true, Hawkmoon, but we also must be careful about dialectical types of arguments which are being presented as being under the guise of the “Right”. That is one part which concerns me with the solution presented within that article suggesting “regulation” as being a feasible answer.

        It’s ridiculous that this is said not to be covered by the Constitution. Every one of us can tell from our own intrinsic knowledge that this issue would have easily been within the intent of the Framers for coverage by the 1st Amendment when applied to the facts in question. Regardless of that even, our Free Speech is our individual right regardless of whatever excuse may be given, and every one of us have to demand that it not be further abridged, wherever we are.

        Failing that, resort to the obvious remedies to enforce this, and all other of our rights, including preparing to exercise the 2nd Amendment right, along with other actions which will be necessary for our self-preservation against those conspiratorial enemy who would deny our rights. I’m not inclined to trust further “regulation” – other than that of our own enforcement. That is exactly what the courts and legislature should already have done, so new “regulations” would most certainly meet the same fate as those which most current leftist-controlled court rulings presently are meeting.

  15. UPDATE:

    A day after Dianne “my driver is a Chinese spy” Feinstein forwarded the anonymously-authored letter to the Justice Dept., 65 women who went to high school with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh have written a letter to Dianne Feinstein and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, testifying to Judge Kavanaugh’s character.

    Scroll up to end of this post for details!


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.