Democrat senator wants court to allow homosexual father to marry his son

Rate this post

Now that the floodgate of homosexual marriage is opened, every grotesquerie is emerging.
Already, a Montana man wants legalization of polygamy, while the UK’s Green Party has declared its support for polygamy.
The latest move: Allowing homosexual men to “marry” their adopted “sons”.
Fr. Mark Hodges reports for LifeSiteNews, Nov. 5, 2015, that Nino Esposito and Roland Bosee, Jr. are a homosexual couple. Three years ago, Esposito adopted Bosee as his legal son for purely financial reasons — to reduce the Pennsylvania inheritance tax payable upon the death of one of the men from 15% (for unrelated third parties) to 4% (between parent and child). Now that homosexual marriage is legal in Pennsylvania, they want the court to dissolve the legal adoption so as to marry each other. 

Note: Esposito, who is 78, adopted Bosee, 68, in 2012. They have been “together” since 1970. (Fox32)

In upending the usage of words such as “son” and “marriage” and “male” and “female,” homosexuals and the Left are making a mockery of the English language, rendering words meaningless.
Nino Esposito and his lover-son Roland Bosee, Jr.
But Judge Lawrence J. O’Toole, of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, told the men that state law doesn’t give him the power to dissolve a legal adoption, unless there was fraud involved.
So Pennsylvania senator Bob Casey, a Democrat, is asking the Obama administration to strongarm the judge. Casey wrote a letter asking U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the Obama White House to “issue guidance for courts across the country so that gay couples who have previously entered into adoptions can annul them in order to receive marriage licenses.” 
Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill., left, laughs with Sen. Bob Casey Jr., D-Pa., Friday, March 28, 2008, at the Soldiers and Sailors Museum and Memorial in Pittsburgh, Pa. where Casey announced his endorsement of Obama. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Casey even provided Obama with the how-to, pointing to a precedent when a Bucks County judge had annulled a homosexual couple’s adoption.
Casey suggests to the Obama administration that it “may have to be creative” because adoption law is a state, not federal, matter. The attorney general may file a “statement of interest” or a “friend of the court” brief. Either action would pressure judges by pointing out alleged constitutional protections at stake if homosexuals are not allowed to dissolve adoptions.
Casey is being hailed by the usual suspects. Gay activists showered praise on him. LGBTQ lawyer Helen Casale enthuse, “I love Senator Casey for taking a position!” Legal director of ACLU Pennsylvania Witold Walczak said, “The ACLU is hopeful that the Superior Court will apply established legal principles to allow annulment of adoptions by same-sex couples who that [sic] they can finally partake of their constitutional right to marry.”
Bosee’s and Esposito’s case is on appeal before Pennsylvania’s Superior Court.
It should come as no surprise that Senator Bob Casey is “gay”. He came out in 2013 when he publicly supported same-sex marriage, calling it “the right thing to do”.
See also:

H/t FOTM’s MomOfIV

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Democrat senator wants court to allow homosexual father to marry his son

  1. Speechless

  2. How did someone manage to get a pic of them NOT playing with each other? People-stand by for demands for every remotely conceivable aberration to be legalized-no,ENCOURAGED,by this farce of a Government. Thanks to Ignorant America’s swing to Liberalism/Socialism in the name of the I/ME/MY/MINE sub-culture,the mentally perverse/sick/insane must now be allowed to do ANYTHING they wanna do,and be THANKED for it by the NORMAL people. And to think WE all thought “BATMAN” was as far from reality as things could get…..

  3. My head aches from the insanity this new law has let loose on our society! There will be no end of creative ideas that people will come up with, using the same sex marriage laws as justification.

  4. Just when you think things can’t get any more twisted – here we go…

  5. The assault on the American mind and conscience has become relentless. Just as BruceLynn Jenner can’t get magazine space anymore, the next piece of psychological abuse gets trotted out. This sulfurous story has the unmistakeable scent of hell.

  6. Soooo, let’s see…..Casey wants Obama to strongarm the justice system into allowing one fraud to be “annulled” so that another fraud can be perpetrated and registered as “legal”…..?????? Am I right?

  7. Great pic of obozo and his girly “flirty” smile aimed at Casey. With obozo, whether he’s smiling or grimacing, it’s maniacal.

  8. No words…

  9. This reminds me of the Emperor Nero, who committed incest with his own son!
    What I see in this article is a beta-testing of how far they can push things. There are people behind these two men and Casey who are gauging how far they can push things. And I see them doing it for this reason: The sexual corruption that has gone on in government has gotten to the point where it is irredeemably corrupt. They fear exposure. So this is a test case: If they can successfully leverage a judge to make a decision, then any more complaints become moot. This case is also about gauging how far they can push public reaction
    I also intuit demonic activity here: The Devil has been busy hyping his War on marriage and the family, doing what he can to get it into warp drive. Nothing happens in this world that has not already happened, in some way or other, in the spiritual realm.
    This whole charade is even more creepy than Alfred Hitchcock’s “Psycho.”

    • I wrote a more detailed reply to your comment re Nero, but it was in the wee hours & it got lost before I could post it, so here goes a briefer version, due to poor eyessight & slow typing.
      The later Roman Emptre created many novel ways to adopt, as the ruling elites were having fewer & fewer children due to male sperm being weakened from the lead in the plumbing of the homes of the wealthy.
      Many tax incentives were created, which makes sense, as it does cost to properly raise even a single child. It also got orphans off the streets and kept them from a criminal career. However, it also made them the plaything of perverted members of the elite.
      Dr Michael Grant, the world-famous Oxford scholar who devoted his life to Roman history, in one of his last books gave twelve steps that show how a society gradually descends into ruin. I read his book in 1991 when it first came out, and according to his analysis we are in step 11. As that was more than 20 years ago, I think the above makes Dr Grant’s case.

  10. WTF! (Could only happen during this Oscumbo Reign of Terror)

  11. Lev_20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
    so much for tolerance……

  12. Kevin J Lankford

    Is it true that demon is the root word of democrat.

  13. Just when you had thought you had seen it all…

  14. Well,..when you stop to think about it,.from a purely legal point of view,.why should a gay man & his adopted son not be allowed to marry,.?
    After all the laws against close relatives marrying had to do with possibility of birth defects in any children, but once you remove the possibility of having children from the mix, then, the justification for the laws against,..’incest’, longer applies.
    However, that being said, this situation raises, another question, & that question revolves around the advisability of allowing ‘gays’ to adopt children, in the first place. In that, how much did the fact that the son was raised by homosexuals have to do with the son’s turning out to be ,..well,..’GAY.? And to what degree, did the gay ,..’father’ (?),..consciously manipulate the son, to bring him to the point of wanting to,..marry,..his adopted gay ,.so called,..father,.?
    I am guessing that the son was sexually abused by the,..father,.. & mentally manipulated into his current mindset,.
    In short, to my way of thinking, this situation, points out the ,,..’un-healthy’,.. mindset, that anyone’s being raised in a homosexual setting can induce in anyone who is un-fortunate enough to be placed in such a situation.
    So,.. my bottom line in this case is, that this situation is an example of the degree of insanity involved in the notion that homosexuals should be allowed to adopt children,.
    So,..(IF) i were a judge, & I were to decide whether or not this proposed,..’marriage .should take place, then I would rule against it. I would rule against it, in hopes that the son would, come to his senses over this matter, by his overcoming the damage that has clearly been inflicted upon him by a society that has lost any common sense, over these issues of ‘GAY” marriage & more importantly,over the matter of, ‘adoption’,.In that this notion of ‘GAY’ adoption is a notion that has been concocted by Satan himself, & vomited forth into America, from the very bowels of hell…

    • Please re-read my post, Jack Murray. The “father” is 78 years old; the “son” is 68. They were homosexual lovers; the adoption took place for inheritance tax reasons.

  15. Thank you Dr. Eowyn for this amazing post. This is about the destruction of the soul of our nation, again calling evil, good, and good, evil, upside down, like the devil wants it. We must pray, and pray heavily.

  16. The whole world has reverted back to the times of Caligula it seems.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.