Debate moderator blatantly favored Obama over Romney

Candy Crowley

CNN’s Candy Crowley, the moderator of last night’s second presidential debate, should stop calling herself an objective journalist.

She gave Obama 9% more time than Romney. According to CNN’s timekeeping, Obama got 44:04 minutes of speaking time, while Romney got 40:50. (Source: Politico)

Crowley also interrupted Romney 28 times! She interrupted Obama only 9 times.

William Bigelow of Breitbart.com points out that Crowley was even worse than PBS’s Jim Lehrer, the moderator of the first Romney-Obama debate. Lehrer interrupted Romney 15 times and  Obama only 5 times. As Bigelow puts it, Crowley was more than just in the tank for Obama; “she dove in and sucked all the water out for him so he could pretend he walked on water.”

All this in addition to Crowley’s outright lie. She interrupted and falsely claimed Romney was incorrect in accusing Obama of refusing to call the Benghazi attack an act of terror. (See Terry’s post on this, HERE.)

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “Debate moderator blatantly favored Obama over Romney

  1. For the next debate they would let Joe Biden be the Moderator and the Republicans would not Object…We are not Fooled with liberal tactics

     
  2. Candy Crowley cheated last night. When the Libya – terrorism question came up, Obam said to Candy “read the transcript” which she had with her and Obama knew she had the transcript. That was obviously prearranged cheating notes that she brought with her. What other notes did she have for Obama. Did Obama have the questions in advance.

     
  3. Thanks Dr. E. I’m on annual training status again and time isn’t a luxury right now. Thanks for keeping us informed. Liberals will stab their mothers in the back just to get ahead. They’re disgusting to me.

     
  4. Candy lied, integrity died!

     
  5. I’ve never seen Candy so fixed up! She almost looked like a girl!

     
  6. What frustrates me is— WHY do the Republicans agree to have moderators that so obviously are shills for the Dems??? I think the writing was on the wall that Ms. Crowley would be as enabling as she could get by with!
    I do think Ms. Crowley looked as good as I’ve ever seen her, despite my disagreement with her political leanings. Now, if Candy would only consider a “total makeover”, and make a turn to the right!

     
  7. What I also thought was noteworthy, is the fact that “Crowley” had a transcript of what the President said at the Rose Garden the day after the Benghazi attack right there before her eyes. Why would she have such a transcript? Furthermore, Obama then said to her to read from the transcript, prompting her. That is proof that she had an axe to grind and was not unbiased. I would not be a bit surprised if she gave the debate questions to Obama before the debate. Of course, we know she was wrong in supporting Obama, but as we also know, she was wrong as to what Obama said in the Rose Garden. It took Obama two weeks to state that the attack was an act of terror, and during this time period, even though he knew the real facts 24 hours after the attack, he in his speech before the United Nations and at other times, lied saying that the attack was motivated by the alleged video, when indeed and in fact, he knew this was a pre-planned act of terror and that no demonstration ever occurred. His cronies also duing this period of time, including Hilary, continued to lie and cover up the truth. I hope Governor Romney brings these facts to light very clearly next Tuesday in the last debate.

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *