Darwin Under The Microscope – Part 1

Rate this post

From: 44 Reasons Why Evolution Is Just A Fairy Tale For Adults
January 8, 2014 by Michael Snyder

On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin was published in 1859.
The Theory of Evolution was adopted quickly as fact and used by educators everywhere to indoctrinate children to the false god of science. As a child I experienced one teacher after another making it their mission to crush the faith I was taught as a Catholic child.. Now let’s put Darwin on the spot, and hold his ideas up to the scrutiny of 158 years of hindsight and research.

Reasons 1-9 not to trust Darwin’s theory

No transitional fossils

#1 If the theory of evolution was true, we should have discovered millions upon millions of transitional fossils that show the development of one species into another species. Instead, we have zero.
#2 When Charles Darwin came up with his theory, he admitted that no transitional forms had been found at that time, but he believed that huge numbers certainly existed and would eventually be discovered…

“Lastly, looking not to any one time, but to all time, if my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have existed. But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?”

#3 Even some of the most famous evolutionists in the world acknowledge the complete absence of transitional fossils in the fossil record. For example, Dr. Colin Patterson, former senior paleontologist of the British Museum of Natural History and author of “Evolution” once wrote the following…

“I fully agree with your comments about the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them …. I will lay it on the line – there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.”

#4 Stephen Jay Gould, Professor of Geology and Paleontology at Harvard University, once wrote the following about the lack of transitional forms…

“The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution.”

#5 Evolutionist Stephen M. Stanley of Johns Hopkins University has also commented on the stunning lack of transitional forms in the fossil record…

“In fact, the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition from one species to another.”

#6 If “evolution” was happening right now, there would be millions of creatures out there with partially developed features and organs. But instead there are none.
#7 If the theory of evolution was true, we should not see a sudden explosion of fully formed complex life in the fossil record. Instead, that is precisely what we find.
#8 Paleontologist Mark Czarnecki, an evolutionist, once commented on the fact that complex life appears very suddenly in the fossil record…

“A major problem in proving the theory has been the fossil record; the imprints of vanished species preserved in the Earth’s geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of Darwin’s hypothetical intermediate variants – instead species appear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fueled the creationist argument that each species was created by God.”

#9 The sudden appearance of complex life in the fossil record is so undeniable that even Richard Dawkins has been forced to admit it…

“It is as though they [fossils] were just planted there, without any evolutionary history. Needless to say this appearance of sudden planting has delighted creationists. Both schools of thought (Punctuationists and Gradualists) despise so-called scientific creationists equally, and both agree that the major gaps are real, that they are true imperfections in the fossil record. The only alternative explanation of the sudden appearance of so many complex animal types in the Cambrian era is divine creation and both reject this alternative.”

Read the whole article:
44 Reasons Why Evolution Is Just A Fairy Tale For Adults by Michael Snyder

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Darwin Under The Microscope – Part 1

  1. Has anyone else noticed that is it referred to now as simply evolution and not the theory of evolution? Not a minor distinction in my opinion. It’s a theory for a reason.

  2. My understanding is that the only new species that have been identified since Darwin’s time have followed cataclysms such as bomb blasts, fire or nuclear radiation. That would explain the lack of transitional fossils.

  3. TD . . . . . God Bless you for bringing to us this marvelous article that all but refutes the nutty theory of Darwin. I believe that man was created by God the Eternal Father, and that our first parents were Adam and Eve. All the children of the Earth came from that parentage. There is not mount of goofy “pseudo science” that can shake my belief in how man came to be on this Earth.

    • Umm how can you claim that evolution “theory” is “pseudo science” but you can still believe in some all mystical sky god that watches everything you do? (yes, even going to the toilet …). That’s a bit rich, actually.
      There is so much bull on both sides of arguments like this, no wonder we never get anywhere, and can never get along …

      • Hey, you’re obviously much too ‘smart’ for me. Let us know how that works out for you.

      • Belief in God is just that; it’s based on faith in the supernatural. However, we can infer the factual basis of it when we consider the Holy Bible — what it says of God and Creation, His Plan and its execution through time, and the measurable and verifiable fulfillment of hundreds of prophesies contained in the one book that claims to be the one and only true Word of God, that same Holy Bible. Those of us who have lived according to His Word and Will, and seen its reflection in our lives, can also attest to how it proves itself true time and time again, year after year, decade after decade.
        OTOH, Evolution, as a scientific theory, must stand up to rigorous scientific investigation. It does not; it fails from the very outset. Almost nothing it proposes has been found to be true. It merely stands as a way for those who espouse it to deny our creation in God’s image, our role to live according to His Divine Will, and the fact we will one day be held accountable for our actions (including whether we accepted God’s position in our lives). It, in effect, allows people to live lives according to their own whims and wills, accountable to no one but themselves, abusing the free will God gave them — to chose anything BUT Him.
        I, as a scientist, researcher, and professor, choose God and Creation. That is what has proven true in my life both scientifically (what I can detect and measure) and supernaturally (what I can not detect nor measure with physical human means). Evolution has not proven true to me in either sense. It has instead proven an embarrassment even scientifically, such that any with degrees or even common sense who would purport to believe in it to the exclusion of even considering God and Creation — especially when done specifically to deny them — are either lying or delusional. One can’t be that ignorant in the face of the evidence.
        If you haven’t already done so, I’d advise reading the Books of Proverbs, or the Song of Solomon, or the Book of Wisdom. See if things written thousands of years ago don’t speak directly to your heart about things that are clearly contemporary and personal. And see if following the advice given doesn’t end up with positive results. That’s a start.
        If you want the evidence-based stuff, read the major prophets (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, etc.) and consider how much of what they said about Christ has come true. Or read more about prophesies RE: the “End Times”, and consider how much of that has already come to pass… even recently. There actually isn’t much more to be fulfilled before Christ’s return… if you believe.

      • That you use the term “mystical sky god” seems to indicate you’ve not bothered to study or understand Christianity in the least… but then tell me, can you explain where the concept of evolution came from, bear in mind that while charles darwin put a name on it, and popularized it, it was present as a “mystical”/occult doctrine before his time, need I remind that his dad, & granddad, both worked on iterations of the concept as well, and both were freemasons (erasmus a member of the notorious time immemorial canongate kilwinning lodge #2, and was initiated at st. david’s lodge #36, edinburgh), this making them adherents of neo-gnosticism, or shall we cover how blavatsky thought of things in her cult of theosophy?
        Trying to reduce Christianity to some sort of silly superstition is defeated rather quickly when one does a bit of research, and finds that “evolution” is far more “superstitious”, requiring far more “magical thinking” than is even required by paganism, much less by Christianity itself, which stands out as entirely rational. Remember those proponents of “evolutionary” thought came up with such abominations of knowledge as to promote racism, and eugenics (should it really come as any surprise that the “father” of eugenics, and another freemason, francis galton, was darwin’s cousin?)… and what is “evolution” often used to promote?
        One does not need to a magnifying glass to follow the wire from the plunger to the dynamite here. However, my comment is not sufficient to demonstrate the body of research available regarding this, suffice it to say, do the research, and you’ll find the roots going back to ancient cults & insane practices. After all, what is “evolution” but alchemy being applied to biology in a haphazard, and reckless fashion, or even reincarnation, cutting out the supernatural aspect, being applied to biology? Spurred by the over-eagerness of the anti-theist types to find something, anything, no matter how insane, to avoid the Truth. (Remember when the propagandists weren’t seeing enough “progress” for it with the desired time frames, and subsequently cooked up deceptions like the piltdown “man” in a vain attempt to hasten public adoption of this anti-intellectualism?)

  4. Interesting pic that one of Darwin. Secret society thing, isn’t it? Silence, and all that.
    Evolution is very much a work in progress, and I don’t believe that it has all the answers as of yet. I think devolution and evolution may go in cycles. One takes precedence over the other sometimes, and they also run at different rates from time to time. Nothing in evolution is a certainty, and it may even be speeded up by entities outside our planet (and no, I’m not talking God, here). Anyway, maybe my point is that anything that Dawkins says has got to be crap …
    ps Still hate The Simpsons though, too. Horrible stuff …

  5. Okay, which is it, did we evolve from the sea or apes? If this is as some believe, why is it still not happening and why did it suddenly stop?
    I’ll take my chances with God, makes the most sense and it gives me peace. Coming from the sea or apes does neither. Even other religions accept that Jesus truly lived on earth.

  6. I was always taught that evolution leads a species to it’s highest, most functional, and most adaptable form. So… if the theory of evolution is true, why don’t adult humans grow a new tooth whenever one falls out, like sharks? If the theory of evolution is true, why don’t humans regenerate a new limb when one gets removed, like starfish? These would seem to be preferred traits, no? And finally, if the theory of evolution is true, why are there still apes?

  7. Chuck Darwin did not believe in God, the Supreme Being, the Creator of all things here on earth and in the Universe, soooo, God created a lizard that laid an egg and Chuck was born.

  8. Well the Jews funded his little investigation to Galapagos. The “conclusion” was a foregone conclusion. I do not even give it the title “half baked”. What was hoped by them was that it would further the notion of our world being a jungle where predators were completely free from any sort of moral responsibility.
    As with all atheists, they are much too ignorant to debate seriously. It’s been several years since I had the last discussion with a self-proclaimed “atheist”. It was a hoot. Did you know that everything got here by “accident”? I didn’t think so.
    This is very similar to “Spontaneous Generation”. Just stir a bowl of mud and you get……..frogs. Works every time.

  9. The 20th Century had four intellectual founders. In the order of their importance, in my opinion, they were Marx, Darwin, Freud and Nietzsche.
    ALL were Satanists. With the exception of Marx, ALL were homosexuals, or had engaged in various sexual perversions. ALL engaged in Occult practices and ceremonies. The major ideas of ALL men had origins, in one way or the other, in the Talmud, the Cabbala and the Zohar, in one combination of another.
    Fun Factoid: Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln were born on the same day, February 12, 1809. True!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.