Congress gives $4 million to combat climate-change with weather-modification via aerosols

The media portray Americans who believe in chemtrails and weather-modification as tinfoil hat-wearing “conspiracy theorists,” as if there are no real conspiracies and ignoring the inconvenient fact that it was the CIA who concocted the label “conspiracy theory” for the express purpose of discrediting by denigrating skeptics of the official version of the Kennedy assassination.

But the plain fact is that the U.S. government has been engaged in weather modification (“tinkering with the environment”) since 1953, as revealed in a 784-page U.S. Senate report, Weather Modification: Programs, Problems, Policy, and Potential (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington: May 1978), which came to light in April 2017, nearly 40 years after it was published.

See “Not a conspiracy theory: U.S. government has engaged in weather modification since 1953

Now, there is more evidence of the U.S. government’s weather modification.

Chemtrails over Barcelona, Spain

John Fialka reports for E&E News (via ScienceMag.org), Jan. 23, 2020, that David Fahey, the top climate-change scientist at the federal government’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), said his agency has received $4 million (which Fahey said could expand to more than $100 million) from Congress to combat climate change with “geoengineering” — which he calls “Plan B”.

But Fahey wants the nomenclature be changed from “geoengineering” to “climate intervention,” which he maintains is a “more neutral” term. He says:

“Geoengineering is this tangled ball of issues and science is only one of them. One of the things I’m interested in doing is let’s separate the science out.” 

Fahey is a physicist and the director of the Chemical Sciences Division of NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory.

Fahey said “Plan B” refers to two emergency—and controversial—methods to cool the Earth if the U.S. and other nations fail to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions:

  1. Inject sulfur dioxide or a similar aerosol into the stratosphere to help shade the Earth from more intense sunlight, just as volcanic eruptions cool the Earth by emitting huge clouds of sulfur dioxide.
  2. Use an aerosol of sea salt particles to improve the ability of low-lying clouds over the ocean to act as shade. This technique is borrowed from “ship tracks”—long clouds left by the passage of ocean freighters that are seen by satellites as reflective pathways.

Fahey said research in both techniques are recommended in a forthcoming study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine titled “Climate Intervention Strategies that Reflect Sunlight to Cool Earth.”

Even if Plan B were implemented, the results likely would not be immediate. Fahey said Plan B might take until the next century to complete the cooling.

Asked by a researcher whether injections of sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere might reduce seafood by acidifying the oceans, Fahey admitted there would be drawbacks to Plan B, as well as unintended consequences:

“When you put aerosols up into the atmosphere, it does a lot of things. That opens up this whole menu of things that you’d have to worry about. [Other aerosols such as calcite or titania] might have less impact, but nobody knows. We want to look at them in the laboratory. We have to use atmospheric observations to find out what we’re doing.”

Several smaller countries have complained that the use of aircraft to inject aerosols into the atmosphere might alter the weather or destroy the ozone layer that protects humans from some of the more harmful radiation from sunlight.

See “Italians Take First Place in Global March Against Chemtrails

For now, NOAA’s authority does not extend into the stratosphere — the second major layer of Earth’s atmosphere, just above the troposphere, and below the mesosphere. But there is a bill in Congress, HR 5519: Climate Intervention Research Act, that would broaden NOAA’s jurisdiction.

Until now, the closest thing to testing Plan B is a Harvard University-sponsored project called the “Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment” (SCoPEx). It proposes a small-scale test using a propeller-driven balloon that would ascend to a height of 12 miles over New Mexico and then release less than 2.2 pounds of calcium carbonate. The idea is to create a tubular area in the sky—about six-tenths of a mile long and 109 yards in diameter—through which the sensor-packed balloon could slowly move back and forth, mixing the air and monitoring the solar-reflecting abilities of the scattered materials. It also would track the impact of the treated area on the surrounding atmosphere. When SCoPEx would happen remains unknown.

Fahey said NOAA supports the Harvard stratospheric test and has contributed an instrument to help it measure the dispersion of particles:

“We’re going to have to give up some things to go into Plan B. That’s why we would be motivated to try designer aerosols, but we may not have time. That’s what Harvard wants to do. It goes back to the question of which path you want to be on [–an  international decision to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or being late and forced to implement a Plan B to stop runaway climate change]. I don’t want to be on the late path, but the question is which paths are going to be open to us. I think nobody can play out all the chess moves on this issue. It is so complicated.”

H/t Activist Post

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

17
Leave a Reply

avatar
7 Comment authors
chemtrailssuckAuntie Lulutruckjunkiem walkerWilliam Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
greenworxx
Guest
greenworxx

We’ve got to convince Pres. Trump to stop the spraying and stop 5G.

chemtrailssuck
Guest
chemtrailssuck

Won’t happen, both “parties” think it’s great and “good for industry”. I guess they’re spraying calcium to counter act all the aluminum oxide they’ve been adding for so long, it’s killing conifers.
They had a good “Unsolved Mysteries” in the 1990’s about some “goop” raining out of the sky off the West Coast (Oregon or Washington state, can’t remember). Not sure if it’s still on youtube, they pulled the repeat postings for “copyright violations”.

DCG
Admin

Separate the science out to make terminology more neutral? Sounds like liberalism in a nutshell – ignore the facts and repurpose language to fit your agenda (transgenderism, gender, abortion is healthcare, etc.).

These fools shouldn’t be messing with God’s nature!

William
Member
William

“We have to use atmospheric observations to find out what we’re doing.” They’ll figure it out. What could go wrong?

chemtrailssuck
Guest
chemtrailssuck

The sun is getting hotter, they’re using HAARP and chemtrails, what could go wrong?

William
Member
William

“One of the things I’m interested in doing is let’s separate the science out.” Not hard to do since there is no science here. This assumes that global warming is actually taking place because of increased concentrations of “greenhouse gases”, primarily CO2. But there is zero evidence for that. The global climate is very stable, CO2’s effect on global temperature is negligible. Artificially producing global dimming, reducing insolation, will be disastrous when another major volcanic eruption occurs. The result will be shorter growing seasons, crop failures, famines, at a time when the availability of abundant sources of energy, which make… Read more »

m walker
Guest
m walker

US Air Force Admits They Can Control the Weather JUNE 6, 2015 GEOPOLITICS101 156 COMMENTS The US Air Force and DARPA would like us to believe that they have stopped using HAARP in Alaska for research and experiment. Even then, we all know that there are other HAARP systems out there in the form of radar communication and surveillance systems that are rigged on top of mobile platforms that are deployable in any international waters around the world. All they need to do is twist a knob to change the frequency of the main wave to the microwave range for… Read more »

chemtrailssuck
Guest
chemtrailssuck

Just look at all the weather modification patents out there.

truckjunkie
Guest
truckjunkie

Is anybody considering that the Climate of Earth has gone warmer and cooler like a yo-yo since before weather was recorded,and will in all probability continue that pattern until the end of times? I’m inclined to believe there’s more to our Climate than anything Humans can “intelligently” change for the better,and it isn’t our job to try. I think this is something God has handled,and WILL handle. Looking at the changes in Climate,I can’t see that it’s changed appreciably,on average, since we’ve been tracking it,in SPITE of the increase in population and SOME Countries’ atrocious failure to even TRY to… Read more »

Auntie Lulu
Guest
Auntie Lulu

truckjunkie . . . I’m with you, our God has overseen this Earth since its creation, and I must say I would prefer to leave Earth’s climate in his hands. I truly think that much of this tinkering is an effort to reduce the prosperity of the middle class and transfer that money into the hands of those who want the superior class to govern this Earth.

chemtrailssuck
Guest
chemtrailssuck

The sun is getting hotter, the “ice moons” if Jupiter have melted, how’d they get cow belches and termites and swamps up there (the latter two cause more carbon dioxide than cows or people)?

William
Member
William

Most of the Jovian moons have water ice in their surface composition. Io is an exception due to intense volcanic activity caused by “gravitational flexing” The surface is literally lifted 300 feet on its closest approach to Jupiter in its elliptical orbit. Europa has a surface of water ice with a liquid ocean beneath. It is maintained in a liquid state by internal temperatures from the same gravitational flexing. The surface temperatures of Europa average minus 260 degrees F at the equator to minus 390 degrees F at the poles. Ice cannot melt at those temperatures

chemtrailssuck
Guest
chemtrailssuck

NASA, also called Not A Space Agency. Personally, I’ve never visited Jupiter or its moons, though I know some people that hail from Uranus.

William
Member
William

Personally, I haven’t been to Europa since 1968. A crazy year, you had to be there. So things could have changed. The claim that “the ice moons of Jupiter have melted” is a rather extraordinary one and therefore requires extraordinary evidence. I’m not saying you’re wrong, but would you care to provide some? For what it’s worth I don’t trust NASA as far as I can throw a piano

chemtrailssuck
Guest
chemtrailssuck

Dinosaur farts caused the earth to heat up! I’m surprised the agenda “climate scientists” aren’t running with that one.

William
Member
William

Global climate is formidably complex and poorly understood. Consequently all of the predictions made by “climate experts” (like Greta) have been completely wrong. They have a perfect record. Climate fluctuates in multi-decadal cycles, driven primarily by solar activity. We have warm periods and cool periods. Right now we’re in a cool period. An example is the Jacobshavn glacier in Greenland which shrank from 1850 to 1964, then stopped. Then in 2016 it began to grow again and is continuing to grow. Naturally the Washington Compost reports that it is “retreating at galloping speed”. How do we compete with that level… Read more »

Auntie Lulu
Guest
Auntie Lulu

Jeff Bezos certainly wants us to believe that we are on the edge of an impending calamity–because he is among those who would wish to be King of the World.