City Council members rip Walmart’s charity of ‘dangerous dollars’

Rate this post

say what

NY Post: More than half the members of the City Council have fired off a letter to Walmart demanding that it stop making millions in charitable contributions to local groups here.

Twenty-six of the 51 members of the Council charged in the letter that the world’s biggest retailer’s support of local causes is a cynical ploy to enter the market here.

“We know how desperate you are to find a foothold in New York City to buy influence and support here,” says the letter, obtained by The Post and addressed to Walmart and the Walton Family Foundation.

“Stop spending your dangerous dollars in our city,” the testy letter demands. “That’s right: this is a cease-and-desist letter.”

Last week, Walmart announced that it distributed $3 million last year to charities here, including $1 million to the New York Women’s Foundation, which offers job training, and $30,000 to Bailey House, which distributes groceries to low-income residents.

Walmart, which has been thwarted by union-backed opposition for more than a decade, said the handouts “can make a difference on big issues like hunger relief and career development.”

The retail giant said its business agenda “aligns with supporting the local organizations that are important to our customers and associates.”

But Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito called the donations “toxic money,” and accused Walmart of waging a “cynical public-relations campaign that disguises Walmart’s backwards anti-job agenda.” (Walmart employs over two million employees, so anti-job!)

Sources said activists will stage a demonstration Wednesday outside City Hall, tearing up giant, mocked-up, Ed McMahon-style checks from Walmart to prove their point.

A key bone of contention is the Waltons’ support of New York City charter schools. Since 2004, the Walton Family Foundation has funneled $16 million into the cause, including the DREAM Charter School, Village Academies and the Success Academy founded by Eva Moskowitz.

“We’re proud of the work they’re doing to transform the public-education landscape and proud to have played a small part in their success,” Walton Family Foundation spokeswoman Daphne Davis Moore said.

Walmart has raised eyebrows with its New York political contributions before.

As reported by The Post, former Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz appeared to soften his attitude toward the company in 2011 after the retailer donated $150,000 to his summer Martin Luther King Jr. concert series.

In March, Walmart officials signaled a temporary retreat from efforts to open a New York City store after setbacks at a site in Brooklyn off the Belt Parkway.

Gee, I wonder why New York doesn’t want Walmart donating their “toxic money” to charter schools? See here (DeBlasio Starts His War on Charter Schools).


Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “City Council members rip Walmart’s charity of ‘dangerous dollars’

  1. This whole thing is about as “idiotic” as politics can get. First off, if I was the owner and operator of a “charter” school, then the FIRST thing I would do, would be to find adequate space (that I control) for my operation. For the owner of the business to be dependent on “free” government space is a disaster waiting to happen. And (just for arguments sake) I DID get a deal with the local government to operate in their buildings (especially for NO rent), I would be socking away as much money as I could to get myself OUT of their control as quickly as I could. I mean really…. that’s the order of business and that’s all there is to it.

    Now, on the governments side of things, Yelling at Walmart for money THEY are donating, that is for the betterment of children that live in YOUR district (town, city, county. whatever), you don’t get mad at THEM because a predecessor of yours made a bad business deal. It just makes you look like a bully and a buffoon, and it doesn’t help ANYONE. Let them give all the money they want to, it really doesn’t have any bearing on how you handle the situation…. God… what a bunch of babies!!! And then, instead of just dropping the hammer, you really should have given the owner time (6 months) to aquire and reorganize to open to take the children so they don’t miss a step in their schooling. Not only is that fair, it’s just good politics, and good business, and good for the kids.

    This story reflects just what crap we have to work with that we are voting into office. Who voted for this piece of shit anyway?

  2. traildustfotm

    Great post, DCG!!!

  3. See? It’s still hard to get just fifty idiots to agree on anything much less a hundred. For people in LoFo Land I am referring to the US Senate.

    Seriously though, you need 51 delegates to run a district? In 1787 we created a country with only 55 and even then there was never a vote with more than 11 States represented. Only 39 delegates signed the Constitution.

    Nineteen of the fifty-five delegates never attended a single session.

  4. Thank you DCG for this excellent post. Clearly, certain individuals from New York lack the virtues of humility and graciousness in failing to thank Wal-Mart for their generosity.

  5. I still don’t see what they’re bitching about-is because WalMart’s millions of $$’s in donations makes their 20 dollar contributions look puny? WAAAaaahh-get over it. It’s for the kids and the needy.

  6. It’s a shame they don’t send a cease and desist letter to planned parenthood.

  7. Government doesn’t like private charities.

    They can’t use them to buy votes.



Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.