Christine Blasey Ford’s body language

According to Mandy O’Brien, a body language analyst who calls herself “Dr. Bombard,” during Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing yesterday, her body language indicates she was using her emotional demeanor to influence and manipulate.

As you watch the video below, just remember that, contrary to her little-girl voice and demeanor, Christine Blasey Ford:

  • Is a 52-year-old (she’ll be 53 in November), middle-aged professional woman.
  • Has not one, but three, degrees in psychology, which means she is knowledgeable about polygraph tests and emotional manipulation:
    • B.A., Psychology, U. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1988.
    • M.A., Clinical Psychology, Pepperdine University, 1991.
    • Ph.D., Educational Psychology & Research Design, U. of Southern California, 1996.
  • Is a professor of both teaching and research, which means she is experienced in public speaking and public appearances.

But we are to believe that this highly-educated, 52-year-old professor did not know:

  • How to contact the Senate or the President!
  • What the word “exculpatory” means.

Here are some specific points made about Ford’s body language:

(1) Hard swallow and beady eyes darting and scanning the room while holding her head high in one position suggests the nervous look is contrived.

(2) Repeatedly opening her mouth like a fish gulping for air indicates “something is neurologically wrong with her…because that’s not normal behavior”.

(3) Defiance (5:38 mark):

When committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said that the individuals whom Ford alleges to be eyewitnesses of the alleged assault all denied any knowledge of the assault or even of the party, Ford instantly switched from her nervous, vulnerable little-girl demeanor to arrogantly tilting her head high, looking down on the committee members. Who does that at a U.S. Senate hearing? That is her true face.

(4) Ford described the alleged assault in a choked voice for several minutes, during and after which there was no mucus and no tears.

The analysis of Ford’s body language is consistent with certified graphologist Leeann Springer’s analysis of Ford’s handwriting:

Christine Ford’s writing…is a combination of “writer/printer” which some use in the math field. However, those writers/printers have clear, well-formed and easy to read writing, which Ford severely lacks in her writing. She clearly wants no connection to the past, which is evidenced in her “right hand column writing”. She strays from being on task, and has forgetfulness. There’s a lot of “scratching over” strokes, which is what some of us term as “litter box scratching”. There’s obvious signs of addiction, sometimes, it’s drugs, alcohol, sexual or something totally out of control in a person’s life. There is a clear disconnect in what she is thinking vs. what she is writing. Although, I don’t have the original writing, I’d safely venture to say “she has misplaced pressure throughout the writing, which borders on severe mood swings. She is trying to stay in control by writing in an AB slant (controlled writing) but in some areas there is a “severe abnormal left slant” as though she is falling over backwards. The body of her writing which is frozen in the AB slant does not match with her signature, which means she wants to appear one way to the world, but not in reality. She wants to appear friendly and warm to others, but isn’t. She is a middle zone writer, which means she’s only concerned with the here and now and lives for the moment. Overall impression is that her writing is poorly integrated, choppy, not free flowing, scratched over, she has some rebellion in her strokes and is stubborn. She also lacks high self-esteem and for a person who is in education, she certainly has low goals, as witnessed with the very low “t” crossings, poorly formed thinking letters “m’s and n’s”. It’s not just one trait that is measured in HA, it’s collectively analyzed. She is someone though, that probably wants her own way, seen in many threaded strokes in her writing. She is careful not to divulge too much about herself on a personal level. Her writing lacks logic, most of all, and does show addictive behavior that is not beneficial. We analysts have also seen this in those who’ve beaten addiction, but still live with the residual damages, which is recorded in the brain. Handwriting is indeed brain-writing.

Referring to Ford’s number zero (0) in “2018”, which contains a small oval, her not dotting i’s, and her low-cross t’s, Springer explains:

Loops inside ovals or hanging jabbed marks on ovals, indicates lying. If seen throughout the writing, it is pathological lying, also seen in self-absorbed narcissists. When ovals are inside ovals and there’s a lot of threading (imagine a long thread) the person is not truthful. Scratching throughout a writing, if there’s no brain damage, is deception. We call it the litter box scratch and we all know why cats scratch litter. If an oval is looped on both sides (imagine hair parted in the middle with bangs hanging on each side) indicates big liars. Those who forget to dot i’s, cross t’s and have cover strokes in small “m’s and n’s” are secretive and they can play people.

Recall that little-girl Ford had deleted all her social media BEFORE she went public that she’s the author of the accusatory letter Sen. Dianne “my personal driver of 20 years is a Chinese spy” Feinstein forwarded to the Justice Department. The deletion of her social media is another indication of her “careful not to divulge too much of herself”, “secretive”, and “deception”. What was contained in her social media we’ll never know.

See also:

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error130
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

121
Leave a Reply

avatar
50 Comment authors
Arche N.AruzLinda PrayBobs your uncleLinda Pearsall Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Andy
Guest
Andy

I had her figured out too. I’ve a similar background, so her demeanor was ridiculous and laughable.
Not the childish handwriting though, but now that I see it, it is meant to show innocence, but failed miserably.
Good blog on Ford’s deceptiveness.

Glenn47
Guest
Glenn47

When I read comments from her students, a large portion of them said she has some serious problems and one said there is something wrong with her. Many said she was vindictive and nasty. These are people that usually love liberals and they get to see her with her hair down. I find them more credible than her.

rsa
Guest

I’d like to hear testimony (public) from the students!!!!

Ana
Guest
Ana

Lophatt – Feinstein and the Dems were involved in a conspiracy. That should be investigated.

Aruz
Guest
Aruz

Just to clarify. Those comments may have been about a Christine Ford in Bucks County, PA at a community college. BA, not PhD. The CA Ford has no comments at all. None, which is odd to me. If they’d wanted to keep trolls from posting bogus comments, they only had to allow no further ratings. However, the mention of serious problems as you posted are not in the PA Ford’s comments, which makes me wonder if they are from the CA Ford before it was scrubbed. The mystery continues.

Joan
Guest
Joan

She appears to be quite the mythomaniac, drama queen etc. never going into real detail. Yes, she goes from little Miss Innocence to just the opposite. I do not believe that she was sexually assaulted by anyone.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

I saw this earlier today and you are quite correct on all points. I off-handedly commented that maybe she’s an “alter” is only somewhat tongue in cheek. If she isn’t she is VERY manipulative. The problem I see is that her personality traits judged by the handwriting analysis, would not lend itself to her expending that much effort. I really do think that her father’s ties to the CIA and her ties to Stanford have much to do with this. In the world of dirty tricks the social circle is not as large as one may think. I have some… Read more »

Shari Harter
Guest
Shari Harter

I didn’t see your previous comment about her being an “alter,” but that is actually what I think, too. I believe what we witnessed was an “alter” personality of that of a 15-year old girl. The high, childish voice; the hair hanging in front of eye for quite some time before she finally moved it away. I just can’t believe that a middle-aged professional (at Stanford, no less) could “present” that way all of the time and be perceived as at all credible. Now that I see her handwriting, THAT looks very childish to me, too. They probably triggered that… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Yeah, could be. That’s how it struck me. Given all the rest that we know about her background and associations. Hard to “prove” but maybe not hard to notice.

alicat2441
Guest
alicat2441

The thing is Ford isn’t a licensed psychologist. I was sent to: https://www.dangerous.com/49836/records-show-dr-ford-is-not-a-licensed-psychologist-may-have-committed-perjury/ today that breaks that thought. I took it upon myself to go to California’s Board of Psychology website and did a “verify” license search. I put in Christine Ford, Christine Blasey Ford, C Ford, C Blasey Ford and NOTHING was found. This woman is not a licensed psychologist and her Stanford bio has been changed to eliminate the “research psychologist” description. I’m beginning to believe this Ford is a pathological liar, where last night I only thought she was a liar.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

I think that they find places for their operatives. I think that not having a license prohibits a psychologist from seeing patients. I don’t know how it works in the research realm.

The whole thing is VERY suspicious.

alicat2441
Guest
alicat2441

She doesn’t need a license in the research area. But the problem comes with using “research psychologist” designation in her Stanford profile and in front of a Congressional committee. She can say she does research in psychology she cannot state that she is a “psychologist”. I am a healthcare worker that needs to be licensed in my state. Someone who is not licensed in my field is not allowed to use the designation. It is the same for her. I have been under the impression over the last week-via MSM and Ford-that Ford was a licensed psychologist. I would bet… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Thanks, that’s helpful. Her bonafides were misleading. I have a sister with a PhD in psychology and a license. I have held licenses (but not in this field) and usually there are continuing education requirements, etc., that go with them.

She must have lied to the university. I guess it doesn’t matter much when your getting several years worth of pay from “Go Fund Me”.

alicat2441
Guest
alicat2441

It’s the same for me. I work in healthcare and my state is fanatical that we have a license. There have been several clinics opened over the years by people who are not licensed in my field. They’ve gotten caught and, if I remember correctly, in the 1990’s early 2000’s were arrested for it.

Mist'ears Mom
Guest
Mist'ears Mom

She’s certifiable if you ask me, either that or she is a very well trained operative. Why does she say she was going to the “restroom” yet then afterward goes into the “bathroom”? Who does that – 2 different words for the same thing? IMO the amount of detail & description to irrelevant details is trying to make up for the lack of any substantive material. Smoke & mirrors. I watched the whole thing and didn’t believe a single word out of this lunatics mouth. Who the heck says I need caffeine? My brain is tired? not to mention the… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

If the voice was feigned, she did an AWFUL job. I can’t stand listening to it. It does not illicit sympathy, only annoyance. If I met someone who was that tightly strung after 36 years I’d consider them a candidate for therapy or worse. The story doesn’t even make sense. The very idea of taking a respected judge and making a sex maniac out of him on national TV is pretty ballsy. Whether I agreed with his politics or not I wouldn’t think him the sort to engage in this. Somebody REALLY needs to be sued over this.

Daniel F X Dravot
Guest
Daniel F X Dravot

Elicit, not illicet. Although her testimony seems that as well.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Yes of course, “elicit”. My bad.

twohawk
Guest
twohawk

Going to the ‘restroom’ implies you need to use the restroom. As an object, it is a bathroom. Just a guess.

TPR
Guest
TPR

She HAD to “not remember” the exact house address & specific names of people who gave her rides to/from the party because the homeowner & driver(s) could be found/interrogated which could have killed the scam before it got off the ground.

Hence, concrete & verifiable memories had to be “forgotten” & ambiguous mumbo jumbo ramblings of her opinions, feelings, & UNverifiable “memories” had to be offered up to the “audiences” instead.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Yeah, I think it was something like this cartoon:

comment image

She was deliberately vague and evasive because they hadn’t fully given her the script yet. Swinestein was just the middle woman. They all work for somebody.

When you consider that most of these slime are lawyers, they know full well what is real “evidence” and what isn’t. It’s a shame that a lot of the population apparently runs on contrived emotion.

seamusmeboy
Guest
seamusmeboy

A bad actress…Like the article, she jumps on showing her intelligence with how the brain encodes memories, but cannot figure out if she was recorded and goes all coy with any other question of substance.

Good article, any person who has lived amongst humans could tell she was acting.

sc
Guest
sc

you are too kind, she was not acting she was just plain lying.

Buzz
Guest
Buzz

She can’t remember how she got to the party, can’t remember exactly who was at the party (changed her story about that), can’t remember how she got home from the party, which all spells she was skunk drunk even before getting there and even more drunk after she got there, yet after not remembering all of that, she was 100% sure it was Kavanaugh that assaulted her. She claimed that she went upstairs to the bathroom. Why? upstairs, was there no bathroom on the first floor? And as she got up there, Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge grabbed her… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

She only “remembers” what her lawyer told her to say. Today the MSM is full of pictures of an angry Kavanaugh and they’re trying to spin that as if he has anger issues. They are truly disgusting.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

You’re right. So why didn’t somebody say “so then what did you do?”. Did you shimmy down the drainpipe? Did you use your super powers to blow the door off its frame? What did you say to the other people downstairs when you escaped?

Oh that’s right. All you can remember is frat boy holding you down on the imaginary bed while his evil friend laughed at you. Come to think of it, there’s room for multiple law suits here.

mackykam
Guest
mackykam

I don’t know why everyone missed this but…there was music playing in the upstairs bedroom but not downstairs where the gathering was happening. Huh?

Kathy
Guest
Kathy

I just noticed this. How did she get out of the locked bedroom?

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

That’s a very good question. Funny nobody asked her.

twohawk
Guest
twohawk

Kathy, it was locked from the inside to keep others out, I believe.

Susan
Guest
Susan

I think it was locked from the inside. Most bedrooms in modern houses are not lockable from the outside, are they? Presumably it was locked so nobody else could get in. But that’s most likely irrelevant, because probably none of it happened anyway.

Brian Heinz
Guest
Brian Heinz

That picture where she is looking down her nose at you almost makes me think of satan as soon as I saw it, that was my first thought and usually your first thought is the right one.
But it just hit me that way. The sad thing is everybody in this country knows what is going on and what just happened; if not they are blinder than bats.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

It looks like she watched too many “Our Miss Brooks” reruns.

TPR
Guest
TPR

Haha, that’sreally an old show!

TrailDust
Admin

Wow! The video about her body language was very interesting. I googled around to find out more about Dr. Ford, and it seemed like the search results were so filled with mainstream media that research material couldn’t be found.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

This may help. There was a lot out there. It could be gone by now.

https://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=104265

Activist Angel
Guest
Activist Angel

Thanks for this Lophatt.
What I can’t find ANYWHERE is ANY recording of her voice prior to this Shirley Temple/Marilyn Monroe act she has. Not anywhere.
They scrubbed every video or recording this woman ever made.

Glenn47
Guest
Glenn47

Her FB page was deleted early on also. Why? Can’t she stand behind her accusations or is it because a screen shot was caught with her saying someone should claim rape against Gorsuch and here she is with her own claim. I find this nothing but a farce and for those democrats to sit there and play high and mighty and claim they believe her before hearing his testimony.
Her attorney has Soros ties, that says plenty.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt
Lana
Guest
Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Gawd, she lies like a rug. “He made me claustrophobic”. She made me lose my lunch. I was kissed (involuntarily) once by a very homely girl. Now I can’t stand to be in the same room with an aquarium! I say B.S..

All they can talk about is Kavanaugh’s anger. Somehow they don’t make me as disgusted as those too stupid to see through this. She’s a “brave woman”, etc.. Right! It’s only been 36 years. Has anything else happened in her life since high school?

Glenn47
Guest
Glenn47

Like being called a serial rapist and drunk isn’t enough to defend yourself. What do they expect from the man?

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Who says sedition doesn’t pay?

https://12160.info/page/550-000-raised-so-far-for-ford-a-doctorate-level-college-professo

She can buy a lot more of whatever she was on in that hearing with this.

Lana
Guest
Lana

comment image:large

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

comment image

Dave
Editor

Am I the only one around here that thinks perfesser Ford is going to wind up committing Arkancide at some point?

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

I hadn’t considered that. It looks like she hit the jackpot on “Go Fund Me”. She’s the darling of the communists. She may feel so empowered she’ll want to be fitted for a dick.

Yahoo
Guest
Yahoo

Her skin is very bad for her age. I would not be surprised if she is a heavy drinker. She also spends a lot of time in the sun…all the vacations she flies to.
Great article. She totally was playing a dumb blonde.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

She didn’t look good in her yearbooks either. All the more reason to think this is bunk. I’m not sure anybody could get that drunk.

DCG
Admin

She’ll be able to afford nice skin/spa treatments with her gofundme money…

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Oh yes. Lying is a highly paid industry. I’m sure she’ll be a lot less “stressed” with a fat bank account. That’s reminiscent of SHES too. What was that about dad being in the laundry business?

I’m sure its all on the up and up. What upstanding citizen wouldn’t want to send gobs of money to somebody recovering from a 36 year-old grope?

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Well, here you have it. The new Mc Stain, Jeff Flake asked for another week. Bend over everybody. Who’s your buddy. Republicans should deluge this RINO jerk with mail.

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/senator-grassley-fights-against-the-democrats-calling-for-fbi-investigation-but-republican-jeff-flake-requests-one-week/

JJ
Guest
JJ

Folks (and I am NOT repeating this because I have read it several times posted today) I am 68 years old…and when I put on make-up…I do not look that old/that battered.
The lines in her face are worse than mine!!!

Zip-ped-d-doda
Guest
Zip-ped-d-doda

Dr. E thank you for all you do exposing the truth. These interviews are so important I posted 2 separate links where you can watch them as I’m not sure if you need to be a subscriber to Dark Journalist to view them. Click that link first and be sure you listen to the beginning of Part 2 so you never use any product with Aspartame again and you’ll realize why it’s in all chewing gum and candy. After you watch both videos, you’ll know what the Circus in the Senate Hearings with Professor Fraud destroying Judge Kavanagh and his… Read more »

Goldbug
Guest
Goldbug

I thought baby Chrissy was really classy when she chugged her drink from the bottle instead of pouring it into a glass.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

comment image

I’m thinking she’s a “class act” all around, no? I’ll bet she’s a lot of fun to be around, don’t ya’ think?

Maryaha
Guest
Maryaha

That look you give when lying at a congressional hearing!

comment image

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

They could be siblings.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

comment image

bonami
Guest
bonami

YESSSS!!!! I knew I knew that face!!

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

comment image

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

comment image

Larry Stark
Guest
Larry Stark

The following from zero hedge talks about Christine Fords father. Ex CIA Chief, John Brennan, who hates President Trump and will do anything to destroy the USA, including pulling in favors. CIA black money operative Ralph G. Blasey Jr. remains secure, too—and who, today, is the Vice President of Business Development of Red Coats, Inc.—whose Admiral Security Services provides armed security for “Deep State” elites in Washington D.C.—that is overseen by Red Coats, Inc. co-founder and Vice Chairman William F. Peel III—and whose Datawatch Systems, Peel IIIalso controls, has USgovernment contracts extending till 23 June 2023 under the category of… Read more »

Thubten
Guest
Thubten

My first question would have been “where are your parents and sibs” They know she is lying.And they should be questioned.
Note also that she omitted the Ford from her signature
Anyone not an MD who emphasizes the doctor title is usually a fraud

christopher garbacz
Guest
christopher garbacz

Ford’s students and friends should know a lot. Addiction should be easy to determine. FBI should be able to recreate social media deletions. Students from high school should be able to provide background. Friends at the beach blowouts? Male contact cut-off? Greeting Mark Judge at the Safeway is a major flaw in testimony – assuming it happened. Why would she have any contact? A bridge too far! Cross exam should have been all over that. Was the father not in banking? Dr title gets tossed around a lot in academia, but usually not at high level schools. Often profs will… Read more »

Mary Laudone
Guest
Mary Laudone

As a molestation survivor myself at first I was feeling badly for Blasey Ford but as testimony went on I became more and more convinced she deserved an Oscar. They didn’t need more time because she couldn’t fly they needed more time to perfect her acting. Maybe something did happen to her but it wasn’t Kavanaugh. No way would he put his entire life on the line by lying under oath. Those dumb Dems asked her nothing. Where were her yearbooks? I also felt she read Judges book or her lawyers did when she mentioned the store but couldn’t name… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Well Mary, one of the advantages they had was all of the solemnity of a “trial” without any rules. Observers were “expected” to believe as the default position. No one attempted to make her prove her allegations even though they were hers to prove. This might be excusable if this wasn’t a room full of lawyers. Everyone acted like the most important aspect was that women didn’t get angry. Even if I believed her, which I don’t, thirty-six years is a LONG time to mull something like this over. I doubt VERY MUCH that in a civil court she could… Read more »

Ana
Guest
Ana

Is the FBI also tasked with investigating Judge Kavanaugh’s accusers, their lawyers with the strange coincidence of sharing clients (Avenatti’s accuser was once one of Katz’s clients), their associates, and why all the accusers scrubbed their social media accounts? They can do that and it might expose the motive behind all this (though I suspect everyone already knows what that is, including our friends on the Left). I know this is a ridiculous question to ask in light of how some government officials have unfairly meted out justice in the most recent past, but shouldn’t the FBI be looking at… Read more »

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Well Ana, they SHOULD be looking at them. It is a crime to lie to Congress. Of course they won’t, which is why they continue to do what they do.

Just like the Soros-paid apparatchik that confronted Flake in the elevator. He subsequently demanded another investigation. She claimed to be a “victim”. She isn’t. It’s a lie. So…….?

Swinestein has been caught in so many lies in this its pathetic. They are all utterly shameless. Somebody needs to start heating the tar.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Good questions. Just WHAT is it they are trying to establish? Is it whether or not he groped a girl thirty-six years ago? That’s not “illegal”.

I don’t believe it. If it happened she would have told someone. Unless of course, it wasn’t really as traumatic as she claims now.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt
JS
Guest
JS

LMAO at the handwriting analysis bit. Seriously. XD

DCG
Admin

Many cases have been solved with hand writing and linguistic analysis. Crimes committed by the Unabomber, Robert Durst, and the BTK killer.

Maybe instead of insulting Leann’s professional analysis you could offer your own expertise critique of Ford’s hand writing. But that would require some extended thought rather than using Alinsky 101…

leeann Springer
Guest
leeann Springer

DCG: I’ve made JS a free offer for a personal HA. Sometimes, I make complimentary offers for those with doubts. : ) Leeann

Lewis Whang
Guest
Lewis Whang

Was Christine inebriated the day of the alleged assault? I would think she would know how she got home since it was 6.2 miles to her home. Did she need therapy because of the assault or because of her sexual conquests and drinking parties? Maybe she had drinking problem. I hope she isn’t a shrinking violet when she teaching at Stanford like she was at the hearing. What is the true Christine Blasey Ford like. Her students should be able to tell you after seeing her at the hearing.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Oh, I imagine she’s more interested in spook stuff than teaching. There’s also the distinct possibility that the one at the hearing isn’t the one that teaches:

comment image

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Looks like Slapsy Maxie is beyond sedition. Maybe she should start a “Go Fund Me” page too.

https://theamericanscoop.com/breaking-ip-address-of-person-who-doxxed-gop-senators-points-to-maxine-waters-office/

Ppickard
Guest
Ppickard

Does anyone have a recording of Christine Blasey Ford’s voice prior to the testimony? I just can’t believe a professor would talk in that voice!

Arche N.
Guest
Arche N.

The “uptalking” inflection pattern heard at the ending of C. B. Ford’s statements [as heard in TV excerpts of her testimony] was artificial/unnatural and manipulative–not at all the inflection pattern that would be expected in an honest witness making truthful statements.
Ford may also have been practicing self-hypnosis in the course of giving testimony and may have coached others on how to take/manipulate polygraphs [according to reports/analyses I have read online].

trackback

[…] As Fellowship of the Minds points out, Ford is a 52-year-old professional with a BA in Psychology from the University of North Carolina (1988), a master’s degree (PsyM) in Clinical Psychology from Pepperdine University (1991), and a PhD in Educational Psychology from the University of Southern California (1996); in 2009 she earned another master’s degree (MEd) in Epidemiology from Stanford University. Wow – that’s impressive. Why is she not familiar with the details of a polygraph test and clueless about the meaning of the word “exculpatory”? Not to mention the fact that she supposedly did not know how to contact the… Read more »

christopher garbacz
Guest
christopher garbacz

Ritual Defamation by Laird Wilcox. Ritual D by Stella Morabito at the Federalist. Step by step explanation of the process.

Myriam
Guest
Myriam

Thank you so much for your keen analysis
I could not believe until I read your blog nobody was picking up on what seemed to me so obvious, the blatant pretense and manipulation.
But I also feel that her demeanor suits the present climate perfectly
If she had exhibited any womanly or adult behavior she could have been discredited more easily.
This whole little girl powerless syndrome is such a classic and unfortunately still fully embraced by women

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Yep. Pretty Orwellian. “Weakness is power”. We must be weak for our superior, The State. They will take care of us.

James Nicholson
Guest
James Nicholson

Its also very hard to believe this professor has such bad handwriting. Would love to see samples of her handwriting say from early this year or in prior years.

Sandra Z Roller
Guest
Sandra Z Roller

I am a retired elementary teacher of thirty-seven years.
I have known that children scribble a word to disguise the fact they do not know the answer to try to pass it by their teacher.
Without knowing that Christine Ford wrote that letter I would guess it was written by a fifth grader.

Ana
Guest
Ana

Hey Guys, you want to hear something really scary? A blogger who had posted Dr. Frauds high school yearbook, which had been scrubbed before he found a copy of it to put on his blog, has disappeared off the site. It was cultofthe1st.blogspot.com. Boy, the Left is working overtime.

trackback

[…] Christine Blasey Ford’s body language […]

James Nicholson
Guest
James Nicholson

Now she took a privately arranged polygraph. If she had failed it it would never had been made public right? Talk about no pressure.
How does that work if you arrange a private polygraph. Are the results made public?
If you fail can you arrange for another?

DCG
Admin

Another lie of Ford’s is revealed: “Ford testified last week that she had never revealed the details of the alleged attack until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. She said the memories percolated up as they revisited a disagreement they’d had over her insistence on installing a “second front door” when they had remodeled their Palo Alto, Calif., home. But documents reveal the door was installed years before as part of an addition, and has been used by renters and even a marriage counseling business. “The door was not an escape route but an entrance route,”… Read more »

DCG
Admin
James Nicholson
Guest
James Nicholson

She should be prosecuted. So should her husband and her lawyer.

Lala Thornton
Guest

People who have lied should be prosecuted.

Wanda Phillips
Guest
Wanda Phillips

She is confused about the year it happenned (she previously stated it was the mid 80s and she may have been in her late teens) But at the hearing says she knew she did not drive there and at 16 she usually drove to parties. She knows she was born in 1967, how could she not know it had to be 1982 or earlier and she had to be under 16 years old? The music was turned up louder than her screams but all she hears is boys laughing. She was on a bed with a person’s full weight on… Read more »

Linda Pearsall
Guest
Linda Pearsall

I have two questions: Why is it in this day and age would someone write a letter instead of using your computer and then printing it?
2- Did anyone ask Dr. Ford (or did I miss something?) whether the party was afternoon or night. Was there a light on in the bedroom?

Bobs your uncle
Guest
Bobs your uncle

The fake voice (fry) would avoid voice analysis, the large reading glasses would help avoid eye contact, looking through them, she would have seen a blur. What I saw was a criminal fraud with among other things, a million reasons.

Linda Pray
Guest
Linda Pray

I took graphology courses from Dan and Florence Anthony in NYC 50 years ago in college. They taught me all about deception in handwriting. I have retained probably 80% of what I was taught plus I still have my original class notes and handouts. The note she wrote to the polygraph guy was truly revealing. When I stumbled upon the note in the Daily Mail UK and analyzed it myself…I could see all her deception literally jump off the page!!!! The HA professional and I were both spot on in our analysis of this liar. I saw her testimony live… Read more »

Ana
Guest
Ana

What I would like to know is when are the women who made charges against Justice Kavanaugh going to be criminally investigated? Investigating these women’s claims is really the only way to clear Kavanaugh’s good name and reputation and stop slander for political gain in the future. It will also stop the Democrats from delegitimizing any future verdict Kavanaugh makes. Otherwise, they’ll just ignore any verdict he makes in the future claiming that as it was a criminal who made the verdict, the verdict isn’t valid. As an American who believes in justice and fairness, I cannot believe that the… Read more »

Andy
Guest
Andy

It’s the Bromwich PR firm too. They were there throughout this debacle. https://www.bromwichgroup.com/about-us/michael-r-bromwich/
Ms Schwartz short essay on use of social media in their PR campaigns https://www.bromwichgroup.com/2014/05/when-hashtags-fail/

The members of the Tribe.

Bobs your uncle
Guest
Bobs your uncle

When you think of the millions of dollars in research in human sexual behavior, millions in federal grants, thousands of books. I read Krakuars book Missoula, and was amazed at the federal governments involvement in these issues under Obama. The best they could come up with is, you should get a long prison sentence and you should be raped by your cellmate big Bubba. It really is too bad CBF and her handlers will likely never face any consequences for what can only be described as criminal fraud.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

Just a bit more to help understand this whole scam. They all have “connections” ripe for use in situations like these:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFL6k5yOAFM