CDC Says Just 2.3 % Of The Population Self Identify As Gay Or Bisexual

Rate this post

Here’s an article from The Washington Post giving what I believe are probably more accurate percentages of the gay/lesbian/bisexual/transtesticular/transcontinental/transohyougettheidea
LOL 
OK folks, I don’t know about you, but this just makes no sense. Why are all these corporations bending over backwards ( Oops) to go out of their way to tick off the 96.6 % of the Country who are not homosexual? I mean they could just take a neutral stance. But no they come out and embrace what many find wrong.  Dr. Eowyn has a post just today on Betty Crocker doing just this. HERE.

I’m telling you this is a well orchestrated plan. 

 July 15
Less than 3 percent of the U.S. population identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported Tuesday in the first large-scale government survey measuring Americans’ sexual orientation.
The National Health Interview Survey, which is the government’s premier tool for annually assessing Americans’ health and behaviors, found that 1.6 percent of adults self-identify as gay or lesbian, and 0.7 percent consider themselves bisexual.
That’s 2.3 % for those keeping count.   🙂

The overwhelming majority of adults, 96.6 percent, labeled themselves as straight in the 2013 survey.

Let me go out on a limb here. If I was in marketing and went to my boss and said ” Let’s go after 2.3% of market while we piss off the other 96.6%” How long would I have a job? No, friends, something is rotten in Denmark. It just doesn’t make sense.
An additional 1.1 percent declined to answer, responded “I don’t know the answer” or said they were “something else.”
Folks you just have to love the “I don’t know ” people of the world.

I don't know either.

I don’t know either.


The figures offered a slightly smaller assessment of the size of the gay, lesbian and bisexual population than other surveys, which have pegged the overall proportion at closer to 3.5 or 4 percent. In particular, the estimate for bisexuals was lower than in some other surveys.
In other words the other surveys were all wishful thinking!
The inclusion of the sexual-orientation question in an influential survey used to guide government funding and research decisions was viewed as a major victory for the gay community, which has struggled with a dearth of data about its special health needs.
Rest Of WAPO story HERE!!
~Steve~

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “CDC Says Just 2.3 % Of The Population Self Identify As Gay Or Bisexual

  1. Reblogged this on Dead Citizen's Rights Society.

     
  2. Good post, Steve.
    In the world of media, entertainment, politics, and publishing that number rises dramatically. I’m estimating 40-50%. There are also a ton of closet cases, married men who have homo trysts on the side. Or women who see women on the side. I think that number is rising as the media continues its homo agenda.
    I think these corporations are being bought off or bribed.

     
  3. Mike, I don’t know anymore. You and I have worked the entertainment biz, I never found numbers that high. Maybe in the upper echelons?
    I mean I just can’t imagine a corporate board room and someone pitching something that could (see JC Penny) be bad for biz and all hopscotching along.
    Damn it just feels wrong in my gut. It makes no sense.

     
    • This is the fulfillment of goals 24, 25 and 26 of the communist goals for America. See here: https://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
      You’ll notice that most of the goals are fulfilled already. These progressives (all the way back to Bernays) were/are very patient with the agenda.

       
    • My figures might be high, Steve. My perception is distorted because I’ve been around so many homo actors, writers, and directors. After awhile you begin to think everyone is that way.
      You’re right about this being an agenda that’s being pushed on society.

       
  4. Out of the 1.6% of all Americans who call themselves gay or lesbian, how many of those are men?

     
  5. Stephen, I did not read the whole report, but I think it might just be broken down into “Gay” man or women and “Bi”

     
  6. Sorry,but I’ll NEVER forgive the Homosexuals for their subversive attempt to make this perversion acceptable to society by soiling a formerly decent word. GAY means cheerful,happy. Homosexuals,especially with the recent increase in the incidence of AIDS in the Homosexual Male population,have little,if anything,to be GAY about.

     
  7. So….I’m wondering….didn’t a whole bunch of people, including Hollywood types, businessmen, very public figures of the day….buy into McCarthyism & get themselves all worked up into a lather & panties all bunched up until everyone got SICK to death of it & gave the heave-ho to it all? And then…you could still hate Communism…but you could STOP persecuting your neighbor for not giving a damn….and the world did NOT stop rotating & the sun STILL came up everyday…and eventually….the Soviet Union of a grand total of 70 years old, fell like the proverbial STONE of its own weight.
    You know, at some point we are all going to not give a damn about gay or straight or whatever….and tell them to just do “whatever floats your boat” but LEAVE ME OUT OF IT…have a good life…pay your taxes…..don’t spread any fatal diseases….and don’t do anything icky in public.

     
  8. Steve’s question is an excellent one: Why are corporations apparently shooting themselves in the foot, in order to pander to 2.3% of the U.S. population — and pissing off everyone else?
    There may be another demographic at play here: people who self-identify as Lefties. Democrats like to think of themselves as being tolerant. In a very limited sense, that’s an accurate self-assessment. The majority of Democrats are neither racists nor homophobes.
    However Democrats, like Commies, are NOT particularly tolerant of people who disagree with them. Depending on the issue in question, holding a Politically Incorrect opinion about anything, automatically makes you a racist, a shill for Big Oil, or whatever.
    My WAG (wild-assed guess) is that the corporations are pandering to the self-images of oh-so-tolerant Democrats, and not just to the small minority of BLTGs.
    BTW, since I’m moderately dyslexic, it’s difficult for me ro remember the correct sequence of letters in the acronym. It’s easier to start out with the 3 letters for the justifiably famous bacon, lettuce, and tomato sandwich. 🙂
    As a straight male, who does not have gender identity issues, I can simply say, ” . . . not my cup of tea.” I do not feel the need to get pompous about how wonderfully tolerant I am.

     
  9. Larry, maybe they are playing to the “Left” at least that makes some sense.
    You said “The majority of Democrats are neither racists nor homophobes.”
    Neither are the right. They just get tired of being poked in the eye with a sharp stick. 🙂
    To me the corps should just make a blanket “we embrace all” and leave it at that.

     
  10. Steve | July 18, 2014 at 5:46 am | wrote:
    “You said ‘The majority of Democrats are neither racists nor homophobes.’
    “Neither are the right. They just get tired of being poked in the eye with a sharp stick. :)”
    The language that we choose to use sheds considerable light on our attitudes toward the subject matter. Example: I’m probably the first person in the history of the Internet to refer to Obama as “President Dogpile.” And that reflects my undying contempt for him.
    In that respect, there are some kindred spirits here at FOTM. Two other appellations that others here have bestowed upon Barry are “the POS” and “President Lucifer.” Great minds think alike.
    In terms of racial descriptions, I prefer “African Americans” and “Black people,” depending on the context. Why? Unlike the N-word, these terms have essentially neutral connotations. I’m probably in the mainstream in this respect.
    I couldn’t help but notice that most commenters here at FOTM choose to use the word, “homo” when referring to gays (and Lesbians). That choice reflects a certain lack of respect — “homophobia” notwithstanding.
    I do not feel that my manhood is threatened by gay men. However I’m a bit squeamish about seeing this kind of public display. Putting this personal preference into perspective, I’m also turned off by people who chew gum in public. But I do not feel the need to find or to use a snotty epithet for public gum-chewers.
    I’m well aware of the fact that the word, “gay” had an entirely different meaning 50 years ago. The Gay Rights movement scored a major propaganda coup when they adopted that term. So what?
    Since I do not hold copyrights on individual words, I do not have a problem with the modern usage of the word, “gay.” Side note: Half the people who currently use that word are not aware of it’s etymology.
    My main point: Judging by the fact that most other commenters at FOTM prefer “homo” to “gay” suggests that they are somewhat less tolerant of people with non-standard sexual orientations, as compared with Lefties. If the shoe fits, wear it.
    On the other hand, I’m finding that it’s usually easier to have intelligent discussions with Conservatives and Libertarians, as compared with doctrinaire, Politically Correct Lefties.
    Steve, I hope that my stick was not too sharp. 🙂

     
  11. Larry, I believe you’re painting with a broad brush. A few may use the word “Homo” which is short for homosexual, and probably would be better if the whole word was used.
    I’m saying people are tired of the “Gay” stick being poked in our eye. Truthfully I could care less what people do behind closed doors.
    PS. My name for obama for a while on the blog was “Skippy” it really said it all. Well until he stepped up to his new names. LOL

     
  12. “My main point: Judging by the fact that most other commenters at FOTM prefer “homo” to “gay” suggests that they are somewhat less tolerant of people with non-standard sexual orientations, as compared with Lefties. If the shoe fits, wear it.”
    Larry,
    Your “main point” about us here at FOTMs is duly noted and spot on and there is absolutely no reason for you to be the least bit concerned about any of us being offended about what you consider to be a slap on the wrist. All of these new labels/catch phrases and what have you appear to change like the direction of the wind. And it even appears as you have come up with your own phrase, “non-standard sexual orientation”. How wonderful that everyone can now get into the act! The latest new term “gay” is simply put, nothing more than a word association/(soft) mind control tactic for people that are too stupid and too easily manipulated to hold onto to what they have been (should have been) taught pertaining to what is good/what is evil and exactly what our original purpose for being put here on this earth was. And trust me when I tell that we were not put here to be engaging in the vile acts that are now becoming mainstream and being rammed down our throats at this point in time at break neck speed.
    Your last comment, “I hope that my stick was not too sharp” is not even applicable here but thank you all the same for your consideration. The sharp stick that you wield is meaningless. The sharp stick that we fight is coming from someone infinitely more powerful than you could ever imagine to be. You see Larry, we all here know what these people do, we all dislike it, we all know who they serve and we all consider it a sin. We are also painfully aware of the fact that they are not satisfied being left alone and allowed and accepted to do what they do. They have everything now that they want but still they are not appeased just as that whom which they serve. They will not rest until they rip out the soul of every Christian/Bible believing/Jesus loving person left on the face of the earth. They have their acceptance, now they are working on our destruction.
    So you see Larry, this is OUR issue here at FOTM. What they have chosen to call themselves, what we call them, what people think of us for what word we use to describe them or their act is so unimportant that it is not even worth the space that it has taken up here on this site. What IS important is that these unfortunate people are facing eternal damnation if they do not repent and turn to God who created them in HIS image…..not what you are seeing now, here in these times.
    And just to make life a bit simpler for you since you appear to be so concerned with titles……the word sodomite is what Our Lord used to describe this lifestyle. That word will not change like the wind as all these other little catch phrases do. Words spoken by the Lord are for and last for eternity. Twisting them to suit man’s needs at the present moment changes nothing. This is what they are in His eyes and always will be. The word is SODOMITE!

     
  13. ok that is it! I am gay! and you people all of you you’re just terrible! what if a sensitive gay child found this post! he might just up and kill himself!

     
    • Why would reporting on a factual finding that only 2.3% of the U.S. population are homo- or bi-sexual cause anyone to kill himself? And why should the reporter/blogger be held responsible for that suicide?
      What you, buzzztracks, are doing is called political-emotional blackmail: You are trying to gag us from reporting and discussing the truth.

       
    • A bit melodramatic aren’t you?
      Nice Alinsky move.

       
    • buzztracks, Buzzoff. As the good Dr. Eowyn said we posted a fact.
      You have parades, we have facts. Nice try though.

       

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *