Category Archives: Make America Great Again

BOOM!!! Theft, FEC hacked or the Republican party has sold out President Trump, his supporters and America. Billions of dollars transferred to DNC PAC and the “Joe Biden for President” committee from Republican NRCC, NRSC, Congressional Leadership Fund and other conservative committees, PACs and organizations

 FUNDRAISING PAC Filings at the Federal Election Commission show Billions of dollars being transferred out of Republican party committees and PACS, directly to the DNC PAC and the “Biden for President” committee.

 

Sources up front

For those that just read the headlines and the first paragraph, here is the source where you can verify this for yourself. It’s at the Federal Election Commissions website. Follow instructions in detail.

  • Click the link provided. It will take you to a PAC named “Biden Action Fund
  • In the middle of the page it will say “Disbursements”. Don’t do a search or anything else. (The link should take you to the page with “RAW” already highlighted. If that’s the case, just click “Export” located
    in the upper left hand corner ).
  • Click “RAW” if not highlighted.
  • In the upper right hand corner click “Export”.
  • A box at the bottom will pop up that says “Download”. Download the file. (It’s a csv. File).

There is no other way to see this information. You have to download the file. It has to be the “Raw” version.

The file is fairly large for a csv. It’s 1.2 to 2.3 gigs. To view the file, I used Apache Open Office. If you have better, use it. File is too large for Open Office. It doesn’t load the last few rows So I ended up viewing it in Firefox.

For the last two days I’ve downloaded the files on multiple computers and on my phone just to make sure the file was coming from the FEC. Same information each time.

LINKS

Link 1. Disbursements click here or    https://www.fec.gov/data/disbursements/?data_type=efiling&committee_id=C00746651

I’’ve included a second link.

You are going to want to see the Receipts(Sources of funding).

Less than .09521% of funding for the Biden Action fund comes from donations less than $200. *Kamala Harris’s “For the People” committee gets 45% of its funding from donations over $200.

 This download will show you that Biden was lying at the debates about not being funded by Wall Street. There are multiple campaign finance violations to be found. Be sure you get the “RAW” version of this also.

A “ZZ” will be where the state of residence should be for all donors that have non USA  address.(foreugn donors?)

Link2. Receipts click here or

https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/?data_type=efiling&committee_id=C00746651

The headline. The links. What’s it all about?

In the Disbursements download you will find multiple filings of cash being transferred from conservative Campaigns/Pacs. The amount of cash being transferred for each transaction can be as low as $100,000 to $5,000,000,000 and up..

This is either the biggest theft/ hack in American history. The biggest glitch in the FEC database in American history or the Republican party backstabbing the President, all Trump Supporter, most conservatives , and just about everyone living in the USA. What little integrity that remained in the political parties in the USA is gone. What little integrity that remained in the political parties in the USA is gone. This will prove that the Republicans are/have been working with democrats all along. A one party government.

I see Joe Biden’s “ Biden for President “ funds growing at a record breaking rate..

 

The following are screenshots of the actual data you will find in the download.

National Republican Senatorial Committee

National Republican Congressional Committee

 

Senate Conservatives Fund

 

 

Williamson County Republican

Indiana Republican State committee

 

On July 16 2020 the NRA endorsed Trump.

National Association for Gun Rights Inc

National Rifle Association of American Political Victory Fund

 

Pro Life Pacs

West Virginians For Life Inc.

Right to Life/ Oregon

 

These are just a few examples of what you will find in the download. If you have not downloaded the file by now, you really should while it is still available. The list keeps growing. Joe Biden has almost doubled in total funding over night.

*What I find strange is that this data should be in the receipts, not in the disbursements.

I’ve provided two examples below of what you will find in the second link I provided above. 

The first graphic only shows  title and amount donated.  Even though the information is public record, I felt it best  to not reveal their personal information. .
These are the people that want to control your lives. These are the people that profit off your misfortune. These are some of the people that end up with your hard earned dollars.

 

The second image below shows  foreign donors you will find in the receipts download. Your download will have all the information I left out.
*Its illegal to accept foreign money. It does not matter if it was intentional or not.



Closing Rant(Just my opinion)

This is exactly why people must vote for Trump. People on the right, Left center, up, down, the side, up front, behind, standing on the fence, sitting on the fence, loitering at the liquor store, everywhere, everyone must vote for Trump. This is not a simple right/ left problem. It’s the people against the establishment. Trump is all we have in DC. That’s if we make it to election day.

There is so much cheating going on that at this point every single ballot must be checked. If Trump loses he must not accept the loss until every ballot is checked, and not by democrats.

Daily we see where ballots are thrown away by postal employees. Ballots printed wrong. Multiple duplicate ballots sent out. Ballots with people’s pets name on them. Ballots with dead people’s names. Ballots with fake names. Everything from democrats extorting the electoral college to shutting down USPS buildings so they can postmark ballots ahead of time. Some will be held on to until first results come in after election day. Then they will know how many more they need to turn in and win the election. Some of them will be sent to mailing companies to be mixed in with regular mail, then mailed out.

If they want to mess up the election enough to where it forces a vote in the House of Representatives That’s fine. The senate gets to pick the VP. They would have to go with Biden. Biden would immediately fail and Trump would take over and be able to run for another term in the next election,

Swamp leadership is so desperate that they continue to expose themselves more and more each day. It’s so obvious that it’s embarrassing. If we have a Trump loss and If we don’t have a brief civil war after it, and if we lose that war. The country will fail. Democrats will remove the police. Community patrolling will takes its place. This is where the Muslim mortality police steps in with their Sharia law. It’s already going on  in New York and other cities.

Racist policies will go into effect. Similar to what is going on in Oakland Calif. They are giving money to blacks and illegals. Paying them so they don’t have to work. ..Maybe like Newsom’s plan where he gives illegals “cash” for unemployment. They doon’t have to show ID or any other type of documentation.

Any policy where it gives money to illegals is a scam. Almost a perfect scam. …They say they gave the money to the illegals but pocketed it themselves. Impossible to to trace the money because the illegals don’t need to show ID. We will never know who got the money.

Maybe they will just burn you out, like what’s happening is California.  This is what many Californians  think has been going on.

Next city to burn would be around Berkeley California. Fires could start today, tomorrow or Tuesday.

Back to Newsom. There are a minimum of 30,000 homeless in the LA area alone. Newsom is sending millions to cities that “qualify”. How to “qualify” is a mystery. What I do know is that the “qualified” cities are taking that money and buying hotels and remodeling them. Average cost is $100,000 per living space. He’s even giving money to the Pomo Indian tribe so they can buy and remodel a hotel. You know, the ones in California that don’t have to pay taxes and run their own government. Native indians  own all the casinos in Califirnia. How much you want to bet that hotel will be a casino?

Yup, millions of California tax money being spent.  All that money to create 579 housing units.

Let’s not forget the millions currently being spent to house homeless in hotels. Yes, tax money is pays for their housing, and in some cases, their drug habit.

Eventually, complete lawlessness.

Civil War? More like a world war. The left will bring in the UN. That means all the loser countries that leached off the USA after we saved them from being destroyed. That also means China taking sides with the left. You can count on Canada and Mexico helping the left which opens the west coast for invasion. We will have Russia on our side simply because Trump doesn’t believe in framing a country for crimes made up by the left.

There is something far more dangerous than anything I just mentioned. Something we all see in our lives. Some more than others. It can be our best friend or our worst enemy. It can get you when you least expect it. It’s opportunity. What will a person do given the right opportunity.

Generally speaking the average person knows right from wrong. One person can see the keys left in a car running and would never consider taking the car.. Another would see it, want to take it, but out of fear of getting caught, decides to leave it where it is. Another would see it as a opportunity to “come up” and take the car. Three possible choices. We will always have people that  will follow the law. We will always have people that would only break the law if they thought they could  get away with it. We will always have criminals. That’s where the police come in. Their existence alone creates better odds for your safety. 3 to 1 in your favor

There are people far worse than the common criminal. Their minds occupy the space where insanity meets sanity. They have no conscious. These people are predators. They prey on people and never get caught. They could be your neighbor or a friend of a friend and you would never know. They understand how opportunity works. Out of fear of getting caught they keep themselves in check. The odds are against them. Take away the police the odds of you becoming a victim just doubled, against you. Now you have to worry the person that will always be a criminal and the person that no longer fears getting caught.

People don’t understand. The danger is always at your door. Police keep the balance in your favor. Without them only creates opportunity for criminals.

Opportunity can turn normal law abiding citizens into criminals.

#Of course, this only matters if we make it that far

I’m going to give the republican party the benefit of the doubt until  more information comes out.   The system might be hacked.  More committees are  being added with money flowing to the Biden for President committee as we speak.  But….

If this is not a glitch in the system and it turns out that the democrats are actually stealing the money, they must be removed from the House,  Senate and every other political position of power in the country. If it turns out that Republicans are, guilty, then Capital Hill must fall. Every member of congress and the senate must be taken into custody.  If this is a set up to catch people like me digging around in the future. It won’t work.  It won’t stop me.

I’m at a loss for words.  Let my know your thoughts,

Respectfully,

Deplorable Patriot

Boots On the Ground



Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Actor Laurence Fox creates new political party to fight the woke Left

Something is happening in Britain that isn’t in the United States.

Prominent Brits are saying they’re sick of the “woke” culture of the Left.

First, it was journalist, TV personality and self-identified liberal Piers Morgan who, on the Ben Shapiro Snow last August, launched a stinging critique of the contemporary Left, calling them “unbearable”.

Then, at 2020 Golden Globes awards in January, comedian and host Ricky Jervais lambasted the Hollywood crowd for their arrogance and hypocrisy.

The latest is actor Laurence Fox (you may know him as Inspector Hathaway in the Lewis TV series that was aired on PBS Masterpiece Theater).

Fox became an instant fave of conservatives when he said on BBC’s Question Time last January that Meghan Markle is not a victim of racism (see “Harry & Meghan Markle lose in duel with the Queen”), followed by Fox appearing on the cover of The Sunday Times to tell the world that he does not “date woke women”.

Note: Urban Dictionary defines “wokeness” as “self-righteousness masquerading as enlightenment” and “being constantly offended”.

For saying that, and wearing a MAGA cap for a media interview, Fox was vilified. See “Feminists see something very sinister in men who don’t want to date ‘woke’ women”.

Now, Fox has started a new political party called Reclaim, to fight the woke Left.

In an October 6 interview with Spiked, Fox explains why:

Fox: I don’t feel either of the two main parties are addressing the issues at all. I feel Labour is actively swallowing critical race theory. It is actively making culture worse. You have Keir Starmer literally taking the knee, and then metaphorically taking the knee with what he said in terms of structural inequality and racism, and in terms of seeing racism everywhere, which I think is one of the most false and divisive things that a politician can do to try to garner votes. And then, obviously, you would have expected the Conservatives to be very hot on these issues. Things like the right to speak freely and think freely and not have your thoughts policed are very personal issues to a lot of people. But the Conservatives don’t seem to be taking it on board.

There are many brilliant movements and pressure groups around that do fantastic work, such as the Free Speech Union, the Academy of Ideas and Don’t Divide Us, which are all fantastic. But how do you really make politicians sit up and listen? I believe you do that through the ballot box.

One thing that has struck me is the viciousness with which the left bullies people of all kinds for having what are essentially very moderate opinions. Aside from questions concerning perjury, laws on speech must not go further than stopping incitement to violence. But that is not what is happening at the moment….

We are switching the whole judicial system on its head. People are being tried by social media, and that can have really awful effects, such as what happened with Caroline Flack. I feel it has escalated beyond the point where we can ignore it….

I am aiming to appeal across party lines. I don’t need to be politically affiliated to want to promote an open public space through full protection of the fundamental freedoms of speech, expression, thought, association and academic inquiry, and to stand in opposition to laws and other measures which undermine those freedoms.

spiked: Are you worried that getting involved in the ‘wrong’ side of the culture war will damage your career?

Fox: I have certainly been told that it has had a very profound effect on my acting career….

If you risk making yourself unemployable by having the wrong view, I can understand why people would just parrot the views that are accepted – especially those who have children.

I feel like I have no option but to take this thing forward, because someone has to do it, and I seem to be well-placed to do it in terms of my platform, my profile and my views, which I think are actually pretty moderate.

spiked: How have members of the public responded to the party so far?

Fox: We have had so many positive reactions. Ten thousand people have registered on our website, and we set up a Twitter account a couple of days ago which has 15,000 followers already. I get stopped in the street relentlessly, and people thank me for doing it. I get a stack of letters every week, and endless messages of support, all of which is encouraging.

I think these issues bother ordinary people much more than those with a profile. The right to communicate and to be able to tell your own story affects everybody.

We need a high-profile person with Laurence Fox’s courage here in the U.S.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

This is the real Love Trumps Hate, banned by YouTube

On the early morning of November 8, 2016, just hours before the polling stations opened, Hillary Clinton — she who had called Trump supporters “a basket of deplorables” — made a final call for Americans to vote for her, in which she sanctinomiously said she wanted to lead “an America where we build bridges not walls and where we prove conclusively that yes, love trumps hate.”

But her own behavior and that of Democrats since shows it’s just the opposite.

See “Democrats, Party of Evil: Hillary Clinton & Eric Holder call for violence,” Oct. 11, 2018.

This is the real Love Trumps Hate — Ricky Rebel’s very moving “MAGA”.

Predictably the video had already been taken down by YouTube for being “inappropriate or offensive” but it can still be viewed on Ricky Rebel’s Twitter feed — for now.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

BLM riot in Beverly Hills turns into MAGA/YMCA dance party

#WalkAway fron the hate!

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

The video the MSM doesn’t want you to see, RITTENHOUSE

Kyle Rittenhouse cleaning graffiti left by vandals

Only the fascist left domestic terrorist supporting democrat controlled propaganda fake news would stoop so low to attack a law abiding 17 year old American patriot.  Instead of being truthful and saying Kyle Rittenhouse defended himself, they chose to blow smoke up everyone on this planet’s  a$%’s.

 

“The teenager with the long gun scuffled with people near a car dealership and opened fire, allegedly killing two people and wounding a third, a criminal complaint says. Even as police and emergency vehicles raced to the scene and chaotic videos of the fatal encounter appeared on social media, the armed suspect walked past a group of officers unnoticed. He was arrested 30 miles awayin Antioch, Illinois.”

Faith Karimi, CNN

That’s how fake news CNN is spinning a Kenosha shooting where 3 democrat supported adult fascist left domestic terrorist were shot when they attacked a minor, 17 year old Kyle Rittenhouse.

Rittenhouse was 1 of many volunteers that were cleared by law enforcement and were protecting  businesses from being destoyed by democrat supported fascists left domestic terrorist Black Lives Matter(BLM)/Antifa, Muslim Extremists and foreign nationals that have entered the country illegally and are working with BLM causing discourse,  attacking Americans and trying to influence our elections.

 

The defenders stopped the terrorist from burning down a gas station.  They also stopped the terrorist from attacking the police with a flaming dumpster.

The terrorist next move was to set the car lot on fire where Rittenhouse was standing guard.

Video shows convicted felon sex offender terrorist Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, chasing Rittenhouse through the car lot.  Rosenbaum can be seen throwing a molotov(claims eyewitness) at Rittenhouse. We hear a gunshot from unknown source .Rittonhouse turns and shoots seconds before Rosenbaum could grab him.  Rosenbaum goes down and we hear more gunfire from unknown source again.

Rittonhouse goes over to where Rosenbaum is laying and offers help. He calls the police.

A person then decides to use his shirt instead of the first aid kit Rittenhouse was carrying.  The same person tells Rittenhouse to go.away.

Rittenhouse starts making his way to the police line and a mob of domestic terrorist start chasing him.   He trips an falls.  While on the ground a unidentified terrorist runs up and kicks him in the head.  While still on the ground, he gets hit in the head with a skateboard carried by convicted felon and domestic terrorist,  26 year old, Anthony Huber.  Rittenhouse takes the skateboard hit and shoots Huber.

Then convicted felon and domestic  terrorist, 26 year old

Gaige Grosskreutz, armed with a handgun goes after Rittenhouse.  Grosskreutz raises his gun and Rittenhoust shoots him in the arm.

Rittenhouse makes his way to the police where he turns himself in.

Police let him go.

Currently charges have been filed on Rittenhouse which if convicted, could give him a life sentence.

Charges were filed before any sort of criminal investigation took place.  At the time there wasn’t  a crime scene investigation, no ballistic data, meaning they don’t  know if Rittenhouse was the only shooter. Video clearly shows he shot in self defense.

Besides the fact that these were convicted felons attacking a minor, they were terrorist in the act of committing crimes. They had already helped burn and destroy other buildings in the city.

CNN and other fake news outlets are lying about what really happened.

So you can decide for yourself, I found as many videos of that night that I could find.  I placed them in order creating a visual timeline of events.  Keep in mind that these are the actual videos captured by reporters on the scene. I haven’t  blurred anything out so you will be seeing shooting, blood and bodies.  That’s your warning.

This is for educational  purposes only.

 

Rittenhouse doesn’t look like the mass shooter that some media outlets describe him.

Really makes you wonder why they are lying.

The person that interviewed Rittenhouse was 10 feet away from Rosenbaum when he got shot.  He also helped carry Rosenbaum to the car.  He was also at the hospital with Rosenbaum.  You would think that being a reporter he would have some video from the hospital.  They covered every other part of the event.  This is the reporter,

 

This is a short video of the day after.

Is Rittenhouse a Patriot or not?  I going with Patriot.

I have to be honest.  I feel like I just watched a poorly scripted reality show.  But what do I know.

Sources

Photos and video captured by the following people:

Andy Ngo

Drew Hernandez

Brendan Gutenschwager

RichieMcGinniss

Julio_Rosas11

Elijah Schaffer

ShelbyTalcott

FromKalen

 

Apologies if I missed anyone.

“Rittenhouse” and “The next day” are unlisted videos.  They are not monetized.  I made them to share information to the public, free as charged.  For educational purposes only. Fair use.

Respectfully,

Deplorable Patriot

Correction- Rittenhouse did not call police after first shooting.  He actually called a friend of his.

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Vicious Democrat: Hollyweirdo Patton Oswalt wishes Trump supporters die from COVID-19

Patton Oswalt, 51, is a stand-up comedian, actor, writer, and an atheist.

Like so many Hollywood denizens, Oswalt is a rabid Trump-hater.

On December 12, 2019, Oswald tweeted that President Trump is “a stupid asshole” and all who had voted for Trump — 62,984,828 Americans — are stupid assholes as well.

Not content with calling us “stupid assholes,” more recently, Oswalt tweeted his wish that “MAGAt”, i.e., Trump supporters, die from COVID-19. As of the time I’m writing this post, his tweet — and therefore, his death wish — received more than 2.3 thousand “likes”.

Patton Oswalt really should mind his own business.

Given the fact that he is obese and the fact that obesity increases the risk of dying from COVID-19 by nearly 40%, it’s more likely that Oswalt will die from COVID-19.

While I vehemently disagree with Democrats and the Left, I have never wished them death, and certainly not death from a horrible disease like the COVID-19 Wuhan virus.

These are the people with whom we are contending. There really is no peaceful way to resolve our differences. See “Not a hyperbole: We really are in a civil war” and “Former CIA officer: Arm yourself; violence by the Left will worsen in next 2 years”.

See also these acts and threats of violence against Trump:

And these acts and threats of violence against Trump supporters:

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

The real Bye Bye Joe Biden. Resurfaced video of Joe Biden.

This  short video reveals a side of “Bye Bye Joe Biden the Fake News won’t  show you.

We learn that Biden has a history of plagiarism and lying.  We learn that out of a class of 85 people in law school, he finished at #76  in his class.

Biden also confesses  to being “dumb” and will “do dumb things in the future”.  That was just about the only honest thing Joe has ever said.  It’s  the future and “Yes”, Joe has done plenty of dumb things.

Fortunately we don’t get to hear from Joe Biden during the  Democrats Convention.  Fake News says John Kasich expected to speak at Democratic National Convention for Joe Biden.

Not that I would watch it but does  anyone else see a problem with this?

*I found thie vi deo on Dinesh D’Souza’s YouTube page. Thank you Dinesh.

 

 

To give equal exposure time, here is a video President Trump uploaded to Twitter.  Twitter removed the video.

 

 

Respectfully,

Deplorable Patriot

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

A Trump Prophecy From 1983

All the way back to 1983 things like this were happening…

This was when none of us saw Donald Trump like that.

I’m thinking about this, and hope it is food for thought for all who visit Fellowship of the Minds.

~TD

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

George Floyd. 3 Minutes of resisting arrest. The video Fake News didn’t want you to see?

 

Video footage the MSM fake news conveniently kept out of their “breaking news story” has surfaced  of George Floyd resisting arrest for around three minutes .

Would this have stopped the riots? No. Fake news had made their minds up.  They were going do their part at destroying the country.  They were sticking to the plan.

*”One of the most obvious ways to tell I’f a event could be faked is paying attention to the news release. It’s  a dead giveaway when you see all the networks releasing the same exact story, at the same time.”

This video just adds to the long list  of events that fake news got caught at “faking news”.

There you have it.  Floyd did indeed resist arrest.  The entire fake news complex lied to you, again.  They specifically said Floyd didn’t resist arrest.

This is just another example why I quit believing everything the news media puts out..  Some might think that’s a little extreme.  No. It’s  the only logical, smart solution.  The days of me saying “they lie sometimes but usually they are pretty honest”  were gone long ago.  If you say you can tell the difference simply by using your best judgement, all you are really doing is selecting what you feel comfortable with. That does not make it true.

People saw the video.  They saw Floyd die.. Somebody mentioned in the comment section in a prior post of mine.  Something along the lines that “it’s  going to take more than different time stamps to change my mind”.

Five simple points, out of many.

  1. MSM lies all the time
  2. “Floyd is dead because the video shows it.”  Yes, the video looks like someone got killed or died of something. .. I get it, you’re convinced.  Now go turn on your TV or watch your favorite movie on the internet.   Why do you watch what you are watching?  It’s because the character’s seem real.  A block buster movie only becomes a hit if the movie is good.  This requires the actors  being skilled enough to convince you the roles the play are real..  Seeing is no longer believing.   If you believe Floyd is dead because it was captured on video, then you have to believe everything in all movies/videos  are true.
  3. If we wanted to use a video deposition in court, most states require the date/time to be burned into the video at the time of recording.  If the date is off/time is off, they cannot be used in court.  All the videos  times were different..  Floyd videos should not be legit evidence in court.  *Time/ date can be faked in any video.  Even when time of recording is hurned into video.
  4. To convict, there cannot be a reasonable doubt.   Time/date or  anything  else that’s  seemd wrong with this event causes reasonable doubt.  Innocent until proven guilty.
  5. Reliability of source of video.

I use the MSM as leads.  Then I investigate the story myself. But to each their own.

Fake ot not , some have come out ahead because of Floyd’s death.

  • Floyd family got millions in donations. Fame and fortune.
  • Black LIves Matter seemed to grow in numbers.  They assaulted and killed police officers which continues at this very moment.  They ignore   black on black deaths., or any other death in the black community..  They’ve actually got people giving in to their demands..  Some are actually kneeling for them, because BLM expects it.  .  Yes, they have been successful proving racism and bigotry exist in America.  BlM being perhaps the most openly racist group to ever exist in America..
  • Let’s not forget the 35 million and more BLM has received  in donations..  Unfortunate for them,  the people handling their money, the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF) has only spent  $200,000 of the money on bail money for protesters.  They haven’t  said where the rest of the money went.  MFF deleted the board members(which are almost all white) page on their site and they quit accepting donations.  They already admitted on Twitter that ” the donations are turned over to ACTBLUE.  ACTBLUE then give it to the democrats”.  That’s  because ACTBLUE is part of the Democrat party. Looks like the democrats hustled BLM.  Watch, BLM will still support democrats. Ok
  • Democrats have shown how much they love their voter base by allowing out of town rioters to destroy their cities, their  businesses, get assaulted, killed and have their whole lives destoyed.
  • Biden says Floyd is more important than MLK.
  • Science makes discovery that protesting will keep you safe from getting covid19 but attending church, working, etc, increases your chance to get the virus.
  • The first time in history that a transperson parent got to fight alongside their transchildren and transhgrandkids with their trans dog and trans bird. Take over American soil.  They did this through violence and   declared their own country.  Perhaps the #1 country of starving people because the homeless stole all the food the firds day.
  • The first time a unknown rapper declares himself the police after removing the police because they didn’t want police there.  He also declares himself to be leader of country by beating and who knows what.  Proving the people with guns win. Tupac  and biggie would be proud.
  • Floyd  so influential and important that he gets minute by minute coverage the day he is buried.  He gets second by second camera coverage from helicopter  of his car as it travels to his resting grounds. The man is treated like a Saint, even though he was a hardened thug who died while being arrested for committing a crime that is a violation of federal law , which can carry a sentence  of 20 years.
  • Police are getting replaced and now, just as I predicted, democrats are going after their weapons.
  • Muslims love the replacing the police with something like community police.  Perfect because to Muslims, community police is religion police or the morality police.  That gives them a chance to bring in Sharia  law.

Minneapolis is home to the largest population of Somali in the USA.  That means Muslim. You can be sure a Muslim controlled replacement for the police is ready to fill the spot.

I find it unusual that CUP FOODS is also the address of a Mosque.  Yes, they have a Mosque in the basement.  An “underground Mosque”. Now you know it’s  true.  They exist.

I mentioned earlier  about the video source being reliable. There is some evidence that the owner(from Palestine)of Cup Foods might have had some animosity toward the police.

That area of town is a hotspot for crime.  Cup Foods being a hotspot for drug trafficking.

The owners  son is a convicted felon who has been to prison. The business has been in trouble with the law in the past.  Both the owner and son have criminal records.

This document will explain the situation better than I.

 

CUP Foods, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, and its President Samir Hamaden Abumayyaleh, Relators, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent. C2-01-399, Court of Appeals Published, September 11, 2001.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN COURT OF APPEALS

C2-01-399

CUP Foods, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, and its President Samir Hamaden Abumayyaleh,

Relators,

vs.

City of Minneapolis,

Respondent.

Filed September 11, 2001

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded

G. Barry Anderson, Judge

City of Minneapolis

Docket No. 9-2110-12612-3

Ronald I. Meshbesher, Jonathan M. Peck, Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd., 1616 Park Avenue, Minneapolis, MN  55404 (for relators)

Jay M. Heffern, Minneapolis City Attorney, Scott Reeves, Assistant Minneapolis City Attorney, 300 Metropolitan Centre, 333 South Seventh Street, Minneapolis, MN  55402 (for respondent)

Considered and decided by G. Barry Anderson, Presiding Judge, R.A. Randall, Judge, and Robert H. Schumacher, Judge.

S Y L L A B U S

If an agency adopts the findings and conclusions of an administrative law judge, but rejects or significantly deviates from the recommendations of that judge and does not make findings explaining the deviation, the decision is arbitrary and capricious, and the case should be remanded for the agency to make findings explaining its decision to deviate.

O P I N I O N

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge

Respondent city stayed revocation of relator’s business licenses subject to store closure for six months and compliance thereafter with several conditions.  Relator argues that respondent’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and that the sanction was arbitrary and capricious.  Relator also argues that the administrative law judge (ALJ) abused her discretion by denying his motion to strike testimony concerning controlled drug buys.  We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support respondent city’s finding of good cause for adverse license action against relator.  In addition, because relator did not make a timely motion to strike, we conclude that the ALJ acted within her discretion by denying the motion.  But because respondent deviated from the ALJ’s recommendations when imposing its sanction, without making findings explaining the reasons for doing so, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

In 1989, relator Samir Abumayyaleh opened a convenience store at the northeast corner of 38th Street and Chicago Avenue South in Minneapolis.  The store sold groceries and the usual convenience items.  Eventually, relator added numerous goods and services to the store, including a delicatessen, cellular phone and pager sales, tobacco products, and off-sale 3.2 beer.

Respondent City of Minneapolis issued CUP Foods (Chicago Unbeatable Prices) four licenses: (1) grocery store; (2) food manufacturer; (3) tobacco dealer; and (4) off-sale 3.2 beer vendor.  Respondent first issued the licenses in 1989 and each is subject to annual renewal.  Relator’s family, including his father and two younger brothers, work at the store, but relator also employs other workers.  Relator’s younger brother Nabil, known as “Billy,” one of the store employees, has a prior felony conviction for auto theft.

CUP Foods is located in a high-crime area of Minneapolis and, not surprisingly, experienced problems with loitering and drug activity in and around the store.  In 1991, relator complained to respondent about the loitering problem, and at a city crime specialist’s recommendation, relator placed two yellow “no trespassing” signs outside his store.  Respondent conditioned relator’s licenses on reduced hours of operation.  On several occasions, however, the store remained open after the designated closing time.

In 1993, after receiving additional complaints about loitering and drug activity near CUP Foods, respondent scheduled a committee meeting to consider adverse license action.  As a result of the meeting, relator agreed to remove public pay phones, hire off-duty police officers for security, reduce hours of operation, hire older employees for evening shifts, report drug activity to police, and remove signs blocking store windows.  Relator understood that failure to comply with the agreed-on conditions could result in revocation, suspension, or non-renewal of his licenses.  Relator complied with the conditions, including the employment of off-duty police officers as security guards.  But approximately one-year later, relator discontinued their employment because of the cost and because “things got a lot better at the intersection.”

As time went on, however, the crime problem at 38th and Chicago became worse.  In 1996, neighborhood residents formed a task force to improve safety and reduce drug-dealing activity in the neighborhood.  In 1998, the number of complaints concerning CUP Foods prompted police community crime specialists to open a file on the store.  Crime-prevention specialists visited CUP Foods and relator signed a Minneapolis “no trespassing” affidavit and received two new “no trespassing” signs.  The specialists advised relator to call 911 to report trouble, and he and his employees did so.

On July 13, 1998, a shooting took place near CUP Foods.  Shortly thereafter, relator attended a task-force meeting and asked for a greater police presence at the intersection.  A few months later, two more shootings took place near CUP Foods.

Beginning in October 1998, police conducted surveillance of CUP Foods.  Police observed loitering and hand-to-hand exchanges outside the store and in the store entryway.  Using confidential informants, police made several “controlled buys” of either crack cocaine or apparent crack cocaine inside CUP Foods.

Based on the results of the controlled buys, police obtained a search warrant for CUP Foods and executed that warrant on November 18, 1998.  Police recovered: stolen cell phones; a bullet-proof vest; live ammunition; a stolen bicycle; ephedrine, an ingredient in methamphetamine; glass tubing; baggies of what appeared to be crack cocaine (but later proved to lack cocaine base); postal scales; and three firearms.  Police also observed bullet holes in a door.  The state charged Nabil Abumayyaleh with unlawful possession of a firearm, but later dismissed that charge.  Police did not link any of the stolen items to relator, and did not charge him with any crime.

Police continued to make controlled buys in CUP Foods during 1999.  On one occasion, the participants completed a transaction in plain view of Nabil Abumayyaleh as he worked as a cashier.  On November 9, 1999, a Minneapolis police officer recovered crack cocaine from a CUP Foods shelf during the course of answering a call reporting an armed man in the area.

In November 1999, the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office commenced a nuisance-abatement proceeding against CUP Foods.  That proceeding was stayed pending the city’s resolution of appellant’s licensing issues because, on November 19, 1999, respondent filed a notice of hearing concerning all CUP Foods licenses.  Respondent filed amended notices on February 25, 2000, and again on March 27, 2000.

An ALJ conducted evidentiary hearings on March 28, 30, and 31, and on May 5 and 15, 2000.  Respondent presented testimony from police and neighbors, and argued for revocation of relator’s licenses.  Relator presented favorable testimony from neighbors and customers, testified to his own compliance with recommendations, and explained that he, too, sought to end the criminal activity near the intersection.

The ALJ concluded that respondent had shown good cause for taking adverse action against CUP Foods, but recommended that the city council consider placing conditions on CUP Foods licenses, rather than revoking the licenses outright.  On December 29, 2000, the Minneapolis City Council adopted the ALJ’s report but, rather than placing conditions on relator’s business licenses, it revoked all the licenses, stayed on the conditions that CUP Foods (1) close for six months and (2) take additional specified crime-prevention measures upon re-opening.  The council, however, waived 90 days of the closure period, upon relator’s payment of a $10,000 administrative fine.  The mayor approved the decision on January 4, 2001.  Relator now proceeds by writ of certiorari.

ISSUES

I.                    Was respondent city’s decision to stay revocation of relator’s business licenses, subject to conditions, a denial of due process, arbitrary and capricious, or unsupported by substantial evidence?

II.                 Did the ALJ violate relator’s right to due process of law by denying relator the opportunity to cross-examine confidential informants who made controlled buys at CUP Foods?

ANALYSIS

I.

            Appellant first argues that respondent city’s decision to revoke his business licenses is arbitrary and capricious, is unreasonable, is irrational, and not supported by substantial evidence, and that it violates his due-process rights because neither relator nor his employees had direct knowledge that drug activity took place inside CUP Foods.

Generally, decisions of administrative agencies, including cities, enjoy a presumption of correctness and will be reversed only when they reflect an error of law or where the findings are arbitrary, capricious, or unsupported by substantial evidence.  Cable Communications Bd. v. Nor-West Cable Communications P’ship,356 N.W.2d 658, 668 (Minn. 1984); see alsoMinn. Stat. § 14.69 (2000) (setting forth the scope of judicial review).

 Where the evidence is conflicting or more than one inference may be drawn from the evidence, findings must be upheld.  City of Minneapolis v. Richardson,307 Minn. 80, 88, 239 N.W.2d 197, 202 (1976).  If the agency engaged in reasoned decision-making, a reviewing court will affirm its decision even though the court may have reached another conclusion. State by Khalifa v. Hennepin County,420 N.W.2d 634, 639 (Minn. App. 1988), review denied (Minn. May 4, 1988). 

A.         Due Process

            Relator argues that respondent’s decision denies him “due process of law.”  To determine what process is due, this court first determines whether a property interest is implicated.  Humenansky v. Minnesota Bd. of Med. Exam’rs,525 N.W.2d 559, 566 (Minn. App. 1994), review denied(Minn. Feb. 14, 1995).  Relator correctly points out that he has a property interest in his business licenses.  See Bird v. Dep’t of Pub. Safety,375 N.W.2d 36, 42 (Minn. App. 1985) (finding property interest in automobile dealer’s license).  Our second inquiry requires weighing the particular interests involved. Humenansky,525 N.W.2d at 566. 

Sufficient due process generally requires reasonable notice and a hearing.  In re License of W. Side Pawn,587 N.W.2d 521, 522 (Minn. App. 1998), review denied (Minn. Mar. 30, 1999).  Although relator argues that he was denied due process, he does not allege that he was denied either reasonable notice or an opportunity to be heard.  The record shows relator received initial notice of the hearings approximately four months before the license proceedings, a five-day trial-type hearing, representation by counsel, an impartial decision-maker, and a decision based solely on the record.  This is sufficient to satisfy the due-process requirement.  See Humenansky,525 N.W.2d at 565 (describing the process due when property interests are implicated).

B.         Substantial Evidence

Relator argues that respondent violated his due-process rights because revocation

extinguishes [relator’s] property interest and deprives [relator] from making a living without a factual finding that either [relator] or any of his employees permitted, encouraged, or had any direct knowledge of the alleged controlled buys.

In essence, relator alleges that respondent lacked substantial evidence of “good cause” to take adverse license action against relator’s business.

 Substantial evidence, for the purpose of appellate review of an administrative agency’s decision, is: (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; and (5) evidence considered in its entirety.  In re Friedenson,574 N.W.2d 463, 467 (Minn. App. 1998) (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr. 30, 1998).  We defer to the agency’s fact-finding process and it is the challenger’s burden to establish that the findings are not supported by the evidence.  In re Lakedale Tel. Co.,561 N.W.2d 550, 554 (Minn. App. 1997).  Unless manifestly unjust, inferences must be accepted even though it may appear that contrary inferences would be better supported by the record.  Id.  Thus, relator must show that the evidence, considered in its entirety, and drawing inferences in favor of the decision, is not substantial, and, therefore, does not adequately support respondent’s finding that good cause existed to take adverse action against his business licenses.

The Minneapolis Code of Ordinances provides that “[a]ny license granted under this chapter may be revoked by the mayor or the city council as in the city charter provided.”   Minneapolis, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 188.350 (1999).  The city charter provides:

Section 16.  Licenses May Be Revoked.  Any license issued by the authority of the City Council may be revoked by the City Council at any time upon proper notice and hearing for good cause * * * .

Minneapolis, Minn., City Charter ch. 4, § 16.

The ALJ’s memorandum explained that relator’s employment of his brother Nabil Abumayyaleh, a convicted felon, and the handguns found during the search of CUP Foods, did not warrant taking adverse license action against relator because relator legally employed his brother and legally possessed the handguns for protection.  Similarly, the ALJ found that, because respondent failed to link any of the stolen items recovered during execution of the 1998 search warrant to relator, that evidence alone did not support adverse license action.  Further, the ALJ found that the three shootings near CUP Foods had no connection to the store and were simply a “by-product of the gang violence that is prevalent in this south Minneapolis neighborhood.”

But respondent, through the testimony of police officers and neighbors, presented evidence of: (1) chronic loitering at CUP Foods; (2) numerous hand-to-hand exchanges, an indication of drug dealing, taking place in and outside the store; and (3) controlled drug buys inside the store.  Respondent also presented evidence that despite the earlier license conditions, the store’s windows remain obstructed by advertising, signs, and shelving, and that the lack of visibility inside the store hampers law-enforcement efforts.

For these reasons, the city council adopted the ALJ’s conclusion that

[respondent] has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that drug dealing and loitering have occurred on a frequent basis on and near CUP Foods’ premises.  * * * [Relator’s] failure or inability to prevent or meaningfully control the sale of drugs occurring inside his store constitutes good cause for taking adverse action against CUP Foods’ licenses. While [relator] testified that he routinely asks loiterers to leave, substantial credible testimony from neighborhood residents and police officers established that there is an ongoing pattern of loitering and drug dealing both inside the store and outside the store’s front entrance.  And, despite some measures taken by [relator] to increase visibility in his store, the record established that the majority of the store’s windows remain obstructed by shelving, advertisements, and other signage.  The inability to see into the store’s windows encourages loitering and criminal activity in general at CUP Foods.

Although there is no direct evidence that relator or his employees observed drug transactions, there is ample evidence, including the evidence of the controlled buys, that such transactions took place in and around CUP Foods and that relator knew that crime in and near the store was an ongoing problem.  Although relator made efforts to improve security and reduce crime, he failed to decrease the height of store shelves or remove window advertisements, and, until very recently, relator had abandoned the use of security guards.

Drawing inferences in favor of respondent city’s decision, as we must, and viewing the record as a whole, we conclude that the evidence, though hardly overwhelming, is reasonable, “more than a scintilla,” “more than some,” and “more than any” evidence.  The evidence, therefore, is substantial and supports the conclusion that respondent had “good cause” to take adverse license action against relator.[1] 

C.        Arbitrary and capricious

Relator also argues that the adverse license action is arbitrary and capricious.  Reviewing courts may reverse an agency’s decision if the decision is arbitrary or capricious.  Minn. Stat. § 14.69(f) (2000).  An agency decision is arbitrary and capricious if it is an exercise of the agency’s will, rather than its judgment, or if the decision is based on whim or is devoid of articulated reasons. Friedenson,574 N.W.2d at 467;Mammenga v. State Dept. of Human Servs.,442 N.W.2d 786, 789 (Minn. 1989).  “Where there is room for two opinions on the matter, [an agency’s choice of one course of] action is not arbitrary and capricious * * * .”  Friedenson,574 N.W.2d at 467 (citing Brown v. Wells,288 Minn. 468, 472, 181 N.W.2d 708, 711 (1970)).     

The problems at CUP Foods illustrate the collision between two important principles of United States jurisprudence: the reasonable public safety expectations of citizens and the preservation of private property rights, which, in this case, take the form of business licenses.

A city council may affirm, reject, or modify an ALJ’s findings or conclusions.  See Hymanson v. City of St. Paul,329 N.W.2d 324, 326-27 (Minn. 1983) (a city council may make new findings or decide contrary to the hearing examiner’s recommendations).   Despite this authority, when an agency significantly deviates from a reviewing authority’s conclusions, it must explain the deviation.  Beaty v. Minnesota Bd. of Teaching,354 N.W.2d 466, 472 (Minn. App. 1984).  Failure to do so “evidences the agency’s desire to exercise its will and not its judgment.”  Id.see also Burnett v. Stearns County Welfare Bd.,370 N.W.2d 452, 455 (Minn. App. 1985) (holding county welfare board acted arbitrarily and capriciously by rejecting without comment merit system council recommendation to grant relator a merit increase).  But see Friedenson,574 N.W.2d at 467-68 (holding revocation of relator’s medical license not arbitrary and capricious, even though board failed to explain its reasons for deviating from ALJ’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, because reviewing court was satisfied penalty was the product of “careful and prudent judgment”).  

Respondent adopted the ALJ’s findings, as well as the conclusions supported by those findings.  But respondent did not adopt the ALJ’s recommendations to place conditions on relator’s business licenses, and instead stayed revocation on the conditions that CUP Foods close for six months and, upon re-opening, comply with numerous crime-prevention measures.  Respondent significantly deviated from the ALJ’s recommendations without explaining why the ALJ’s recommendations were rejected or making additional findings to support this disposition.  At a minimum, a business owner with property rights in the form of government licenses is entitled to know the reasons for adverse action by the city council.  We therefore hold that the absence of such findings renders the respondent city’s decision arbitrary and capricious, and we reverse and remand for additional proceedings and to permit respondent to make appropriate findings explaining its decision.

We caution respondent, however, that any additional findings or conclusions it may adopt on remand, to explain its reasons for significantly deviating from the ALJ’s recommendations, must be limited to the issues raised in the earlier proceedings.  See Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Bd. of Comm’rs, 617 N.W.2d 566, 580 (Minn. 2000); Earthburners, Inc. v. County of Carlton, 513 N.W.2d 460, 463 (Minn. 1994) (reviewing board “must confine its inquiry to those issues raised in [the] earlier proceedings”); White Bear Rod & Gun Club v. City of Hugo, 388 N.W.2d 739, 742 (Minn. 1986) (city council not required to make formal findings but, at a minimum, must “‘have the reasons for its decision recorded or reduced to writing and in more than just a conclusory fashion’” (quotation omitted)). 

II.

            Relator also argues that the ALJ abused her discretion by denying relator’s motion to strike testimony concerning the confidential informants who completed “controlled buys” inside CUP Foods, contending that by failing to strike that testimony the ALJ denied him his right to confront the informants.  Evidentiary rulings in administrative proceedings are subject to an abuse-of-discretion standard.  See Lee v. Lee,459 N.W.2d 365, 369 (Minn. App. 1990) (applying abuse-of-discretion standard to appeal of evidentiary ruling on hearsay evidence made during an administrative child-support hearing conducted under Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act rules), review denied(Minn. Oct. 18, 1990).

During the license hearings, respondent’s counsel questioned Sherry Appledorn, the police officer who arranged the controlled buys, about her conversations with the confidential informants.  Relator’s counsel objected on hearsay grounds.  The ALJ sustained the objection, but permitted the officer to testify concerning matters within her own knowledge.  At the close of the hearings, relator moved to strike all testimony concerning the controlled buys on the basis that he was denied the right to confront the informants.  The ALJ ruled that the request was untimely.  Respondent argues that this court need not reach the issue of confrontation because relator’s motion to strike was untimely.  We agree.

The rule that an objection to the admission of evidence must be made at the time the evidence is offered is well established.  Eilola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.,201 Minn. 77, 79, 275 N.W. 408, 409 (1937); see also Minn. R. Evid. 103(a)(1) (providing that there is no error unless an evidentiary ruling affects a substantial right of a party and a timely objection or motion to strike is made).  Although relator objected to out-of-court statements made by the informants as hearsay, relator did not (1) bring any motion to compel respondent to disclose the informants’ identities, even though the initial notice of hearing indicated that the controlled buys would be part of respondent’s evidence, or (2) object to the admission of Appledorn’s testimony concerning her knowledge of the controlled buys until the close of the hearing in May 2000, more than one month after she testified.  We therefore conclude that the ALJ acted within her discretion by denying relator’s motion to strike, and we decline to further address relator’s confrontation claims.

D E C I S I O N

Respondent’s conclusion that there is good cause to take adverse license action against relator is supported by substantial evidence.  Respondent’s decision to deviate from the sanctions recommended by the ALJ, however, is arbitrary and capricious because the deviations are significant and respondent did not make findings explaining its decision to deviate.  Finally, the ALJ did not abuse her discretion by denying relator’s motion to strike testimony concerning controlled drug buys because the motion was untimely.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

[1]Relator devotes more than three pages of his brief to a discussion of Saxon Coffee Shop, Inc. v. Boston Lic. Bd.,407 N.E.2d 311 (Mass. 1980).  In Saxon,a license-revocation action, criminal activity inside a store and the non-cooperation of the store’s management did not meet the substantial-evidence test.  Id at 319.  We reject Saxon’sreasoning because City of Mankato v. Mahony,542 N.W.2d 689 (Minn. App. 1996), suggests that a city may take adverse-license action in response to criminal activity if the licensee does not cooperate to prevent future violations.  Id. at 692 (reversing revocation of landlord’s license where landlord acted responsibly to prevent further violations of city noise codes). 

Source

Perhaps Floyd and the business was doing a drug deal.  When Floyd was on the ground, leaning against Dragon Wok, an officer leaned over and picked something up off the ground and put it in his pocket.  Maybe it was just a dime or something.

False Flag or not, the whole situation has the Democrats name written all over it.  It’s  only going to get worse until election  day.

Respectfully

Deplorable Patriot.

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Evidence points to CNN and Shaun King guilty of fabricating George Floyd video.

 

More  and more information related to this event becomes available daily.  In an effort to not be fake news. I will be updating this post often..  For example, The original version of this post was based on a video that lead  me to believe the event happened on one street.  Later on after posting, a new, more complete video became available.  Irregardless,  my opinion on this event will not change.  I believe this event was staged. The embedded recording times in the  videos iis the proof. That is the focus of this post/research.  If  the information was not related to the video time, chances are I didn’t  include it. Sometimes too much information can be confusing and unnecessary once you have proven your point.  I believe this is one of those situations.  Any information I include that does not support my point, I do so in the spirit of information  sharing.

 

Update- Body cam footage  worn by officer driving “Park Police” vehicle has different  embedded time  and  date in video.  That’s  3 different recording times  for 3 different  video’s  of the same event.

Given the obvious importance of accurate time and date in body cam videos. Real police officers would be sure time was correct.  

 

 

 

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0