Category Archives: 2018 midterm elections

Media blackout: Email shows Google tried to help elect Clinton

I saw this Monday night. And as predicted, the DNC-loving media are not reporting on Tucker’s story.

And who are the ones colluding?

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
0
 

This is the Left: Trump-hater assaults California GOP candidate; death threats to pro-life UK legislator

Last Sunday, Sept. 9, 2018, in Castro Valley, California, a Trump hater and gun-control activist tried to stab Republican congressional candidate Rudy Peters with a switch blade.

As reported by the San Francisco Chronicle, Peters was working an election booth at a town festival when Farzad Vincent Fazeli, 35, shouting “Fuck Trump! Fuck Trump!,” threw a coffee cup at Peters. Peters said he threw Fazeli to the ground, but Fazeli hopped back up and reached into his pocket for the switchblade, screaming: “I’m gonna kill you, motherfucker!”. 

Peters grabbed a sign from a nearby booth and braced to use it as a shield. Fortunately, Fazeli’s switchblade’s knife wouldn’t shoot out. A bystander stepped in and urged Fazeli to calm down, who then left the booth.

Witnesses corroborated Peters’ account of what happened.

Peters reported the incident to the Sheriff’s Office, which had deputies seated a few booths away. Fazeli was soon arrested at a nearby bank and charged on Tuesday with a felony count of making criminal threats and misdemeanor counts of exhibiting a deadly weapon and possessing a switchblade.

Fazeli has past convictions in Alameda County for burglary and battery, but is licensed to work as a security guard in California, according to state documents. Information Liberation points out that Fazeli’s Facebook shows he’s a pro-gun control “March For Our Lives” supporter who wants to disarm the American public “presumably so he and his ilk can have an easier time killing us.”

Rudy Peters, 56, a founder and co-owner of AARD Solutions, LLC, a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business, is running for the 15th Congressional District of California (webpage here) and is a supporter of President Trump. Peters’ opponent is incumbent Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Dublin).

Meanwhile, on the night of August 1, 2018 in Somerset, England, pro-aborts spray-painted the home of pro-life Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg with death threats.

As reported by The Sun, the vandals spray-painted profanities and “shut up and die” on the family’s garage, and “posh scum” and “politics death” on a patio window. In the family’s yard, they desecrated a cross with condoms, and spray-painted the word “scum” and an anarchist symbol on a family car. The vandals also stuck a dildo covered with a condom on the vehicle.

Luckily, Rees-Mogg, his wife and their six children were on vacation in New York.

Abortion is legal for basically any reason up to 6 months in England, and later in a wide variety of circumstances. A pro-life Catholic, Rees-Mogg has called for an end to abortion. He told the BBC in 2017, “There are 185,000 abortions carried out each year, I think that is a deep sadness.” He said he would support an amendment to restrict abortions “by as many weeks as possible” but admitted that it probably would not happen because most British politicians are pro-abort.

LifeNews.com points out that pro-life politicians in the United States also have been targets of vandalism, death threats and violence. At least three prominent pro-life U.S. representatives, within one week last July, all received death threats.

H/t FOTM readers Flanders and Big Lug

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Good news: Senate demorats confirmed lots of Trump’s judges so they could go on vacation

From HuffPo: Senate Democrats just gave a huge gift to President Donald Trump: They agreed to expedite votes on 15 of his nominees to lifetime federal court seats because they wanted to go home.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) had lined up votes for all those district court nominees last week. Normally, Senate rules require up to 30 hours of waiting time for each nominee ― something Democrats typically take advantage of to delay action on confirming Trump judges. But Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) cut a deal with McConnell on Tuesday to bypass the wait times and let them all get through.

Why? So Democrats could get back to campaigning and focusing on winning re-election in November. The Senate is now out of session until next Tuesday.

Of the 15 nominees, six were confirmed by voice votes on Tuesday. Another one was confirmed on a recorded vote. The remaining eight will get quick votes next week.

It’s a major win for Trump and McConnell, whose No. 1 priority is filling up federal courts with conservative judges ― many of whom are incredibly anti-abortion, anti–LGBTQ rights and anti–voting rights. Trump has gotten 26 circuit court judges confirmed, more than any other president at this point in his term. Another way of putting it: 1 in 7 U.S. circuit court seats is now filled by a judge nominated by Trump.

Add that Trump put Neil Gorsuch on the Supreme Court and is poised to get another justice through, Brett Kavanaugh, and you’ve got a president drastically reshaping the nation’s courts for generations.

Some progressives are furious that Democrats just handed more judges to Trump, particularly given recent revelations implicating the president in federal crimes. It would have taken only one Democratic senator to say “no” to letting the nominees through this week, but none did.

“Trading this many lifetime positions away for a couple days back home in the dead of August is a metaphor for how myopic the Democrats’ approach has been at this dark moment in history,” said Brian Fallon, who, awkwardly, was previously Schumer’s chief spokesperson. He is now the executive director of Demand Justice, a progressive judicial advocacy group.

“An entire branch of government is being lost for generations, and Senate Democrats are willfully blind to it,” Fallon said. “In the coming months and years, these same Democrats will issue outraged statements about the rulings issued by the very judges that they could not be bothered to try to slow down. It is pathetic.”

Read the whole story here.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Democrats’ battle plan against Trump if they win the House this November

A documents has surfaced revealing Democrats’ battle plan if they win control of the House of Representatives in the upcoming midterm election this November.

Matthew Boyle reports for Breitbart, Aug. 26, 2018, that the document was revealed by Jonathan Swan of Axios.

The document is a spreadsheet prepared by House GOP officials which meticulously previews the investigations Democrats will likely launch if they flip the House. The document is being  circulated through Republican circles on and off Capitol Hill — including at least one leadership office.

Below is Swan’s bullet point list of Democrats’ battle plan of their investigations if they regain a majority control of the House:

  • President Trump’s tax returns
  • Trump family businesses — and whether they comply with the Constitution’s emoluments clause, including the Chinese trademark grant to the Trump Organization
  • Trump’s dealings with Russia, including the president’s preparation for his meeting with Vladimir Putin
  • The payment to Stephanie Clifford — a.k.a. Stormy Daniels
  • James Comey’s firing
  • Trump’s firing of U.S. attorneys
  • Trump’s proposed transgender ban for the military
  • Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s business dealings
  • White House staff’s personal email use
  • Cabinet secretary travel, office expenses, and other misused perks
  • Discussion of classified information at Mar-a-Lago
  • Jared Kushner’s ethics law compliance
  • Dismissal of members of the EPA board of scientific counselors
  • The travel ban
  • Family separation policy
  • Hurricane response in Puerto Rico
  • Election security and hacking attempts
  • White House security clearances

Meanwhile, a new Pew Research Center study found that although the rank of file of both Democrats and Republicans believe that the upcoming midterm election is important, with three-quarters in both parties saying it “really matters” which party wins control of Congress, Democrat voters are reporting higher levels of political activity – from attending political rallies to donating to campaigns – than GOP voters.

The new national survey by Pew Research Center, conducted July 31-August 12 among 4,581 adults, including 4,000 registered voters, found that:

  • Whereas 14% of voters say they have attended a political rally, protest or campaign event in the past year, 22% of registered voters who favor the Democratic candidate in their House district say they have attended a political event, compared with just 8% of those who support the Republican candidate.
  • 23% of Democratic voters say they have donated to political campaigns, compared with 18% of Republican voters.
  • Democratic voters are also more likely to have contacted an elected official (36% vs. 28%) and volunteered for a campaign (9% vs. 5%).

H/t CSM

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
0
 

The Coming Democrat Vote Fraud: dead voters in Ohio; non-citizen voters in Texas; Pelosi tells Dems to be unscrupulous

Originally published on Blogger, August 17, 2018.

All signs are pointing to massive vote fraud by the Democrats this November.

In just one congressional district (the 12th) in Ohio, as many as 170 registered voters are either dead or fakes because they are all over 116 years old. (Breitbart)

The majority of those 170 — 124 in all — are a remarkable 218 years old, all born on January 1 in the year 1800, three years before Ohio became a state!

In Texas, more than 280,000 non-citizens are registered to vote. Additionally, another four million registered voters – or 30 percent – of Texas’ 14.1 million registered voters cannot be found in Texas Department of Public Safety’s database. It is unknown how many of the four million are improperly registered and voting illegally.

As reported by Ross Kecseg of Empower Texans, those stunning facts were revealed yesterday by Direct Action Texas (DAT), a watchdog organization known for exposing mail ballot fraud in Texas.

DAT is joined by two other citizens’ groups, Grassroots America: We the People (GAWTP) and Texas Conservative Grassroots Coalition, in a letter to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, who ostensibly had made election integrity a priority, asking Abbott to direct the Secretary of State to verify the citizenship of persons registered to vote in Texas, and notify local county registrars of their findings. The letter reads:

“Unfortunately, Texans continue to see headlines of non-citizens voting in our elections. In Tarrant County, Rosa Ortega, a legal resident, non-citizen, had been voting for 10 years before being caught and convicted. In Beaumont, an El Salvadoran was indicted on multiple federal charges for having voted in the 2016 Presidential election…In a recent interview Starr County District Attorney Omar Escobar confirmed that non-U.S. citizens are on the voter lists in his county. He is quoted stating, ‘That non-citizens are registered to vote is beyond question. That non-citizens are voting in Starr County is also beyond question.’ They are registered and voting, the only remaining question is, how many.

Public Interest Legal Foundation, a public interest law firm dedicated to election integrity, has documented non-citizens registered and voting in several states, including Texas, and is suing Harris County in federal court for refusing access to public records of non-citizens found on the county’s voter rolls.

State Sen. Don Huffines (R–Dallas) has committed to file legislation that would force the Secretary of State to verify citizenship of all registered voters. Similar legislation had previously been filed by outgoing State Sen. Van Taylor (R–Plano), but Republicans didn’t move the bill.

Meanwhile, Democrat House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi brazenly tells her fellow Democrats to “do whatever they have to do” to win the upcoming mid-term elections. 

Pelosi appeared on MSNBC’s “AM Joy” on Sunday, August 12, with guest host Jonathan Capehart, a Washington Post columnist, for a wide-ranging discussion during which she lashed out at a supposed media conspiracy to undermine her leadership.

On the upcoming November midterm elections, suffering delusions of grandeur, Pelosi said:

“The Republicans are spending millions, tens of millions of dollars against me because they’re afraid of me, because I outraise them in the political arena, I outsmart them at the negotiating table, and because I’m a woman.”

Then Pelosi told the members of her party to do whatever they “have to do” to get elected. She said:

“Now, I do believe that none of us is indispensable, but I think I’m the best person for the job [of House Speaker]. I won’t let the Republican ads which are just flooding these districts. I say to the [Democrat] candidates ‘do whatever you have to do, just win baby…we must do this’.”

The dictionary defines “unscrupulous” as “Devoid of scruples; oblivious to or contemptuous of what is right or honorable.”

Pelosi’s “whatever they have to do” implies just that — “whatever” — which in turn implies that the leader of House Democrats is telling her party to have no scruples and to use whatever ploy they can, including lies, to get elected.

See also “End of 1982 Consent Decree: GOP finally can contest vote fraud after 36 years”.

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
0
 

End of 1982 Consent Decree: GOP finally can contest vote fraud after 36 years

This is a re-publish of my post of August 7, 2018, on the WordPress-hosted Fellowship of the Minds (FOTM), which WordPress obliterated by arbitrarily and without warning shutting down FOTM — the digital equivalent of burning an entire library.

Just in time for this November’s mid-term elections!

Did you know that since 1982, the Republican Party had been legally prohibited from contesting elections due to suspected vote fraud, because of a legal agreement called the Consent Decree the GOP made with the Democrat Party?

Finally, 36 years later, a judge has ended the agreement, freeing the Republican Party to ensure electoral integrity by investigating and pursuing suspected vote fraud.

Betcha you never heard or seen this truly momentous news in the Left-infested mainstream media. Why’s that?

The 1982 Consent Decree

As I explained in my post of November 15, 2012, “Why the GOP won’t challenge vote fraud,” in 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the Republican National Committee (RNC), the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).

The lawsuit alleged that:

  • The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.
  • The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.
  • The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.

To settle the lawsuit, in 1982 — while Ronald Reagan was President (1981-1989) — the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance.

The two parties agreed that “in the future, in all states and territories of the United States,” they would:

(d) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their employees to campaign within restricted polling areas or to interrogate prospective voters as to their qualifications to vote prior to their entry to a polling place;

(e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;

(f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.

The RNC also agreed that the RNC, its agents, servants, and employees would be bound by the Decree, “whether acting directly or indirectly through other party committees.”

To put it bluntly, the Consent Decree in effect gave a carte blanche to the Democrat Party to commit vote fraud in every voting district across America that has, in the language of the Consent Decree, “a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations.” The term “substantial proportion” is not defined.

In 1987, the Consent Decree was modified to define “ballot security activities” as “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud.”

Since 1982, the Consent Decree had been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, who, even after he retired, returned every year for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year. Debevoise died in August 2015.

U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise

In 2010, the RNC appealed “to vacate or modify” the Consent Decree in “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012). But an appeals judge at the New Jersey District Court, Obama appointee Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., declined to vacate the decree.

Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit

Flash forward to December 1, 2017, when the Consent Decree was due to expire.

According to NJ.com, the Democrat Party tried to extend the Consent Decree, claiming that the 2016 Trump presidential campaign had colluded with the RNC in voter intimidation efforts, and that Trump’s commission to examine suspected Democratic voter fraud was, in the words of Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), “a thinly veiled voter suppression effort”.

But Sean Spicer, who had been a top RNC official before entering the Trump White House as spokesman, testified there was no collusion of the Trump campaign with the RNC, and that the RNC had stayed away from all 2016 election day activities, including any voter-intimidation, voter-suppression or ballot-security efforts. Nor did any party officials discuss voter fraud allegations with the Trump campaign. Spicer said:

“It had been abundantly clear for the six years that I worked at the RNC that the RNC and its employees were prohibited from engaging in Election Day activities, including poll watching, so I intentionally stayed away from all of that.

The [RNC] counsel’s office had been vigilant in informing both senior staff and subordinates on the importance of the consent decree and the activities that we were clearly should not be engaged at or be even perceived as engaging in. And so we had grown accustomed to not even coming too close to a line that would in any way, shape, or form lead one to believe that we were engaged in those activities.”

RNC lawyer Bobby Burchfield said Spicer’s testimony proved there was no collusion and asked the presiding judge, U.S. District Court Judge John Michael Vazquez, to allow the 1982 Consent Decree to expire.

As reported by NJ.com on January 9, 2018, Judge Vazquez ruled that the Democratic National Committee did not prove that the RNC violated the Consent Decree prior to its Dec. 1, 2017, expiration date.

And with that, Judge Vazquez, an Obama appointee, ended that noxious 1982 Consent Decree legal agreement between the RNC and DNC which had tied the Republican Party’s hands from contesting elections and investigating vote fraud for 36 years.

RNC spokesman Michael Ahrens said “We are gratified that the judge recognized our full compliance with the consent decree and rejected the DNC’s baseless claims” and that Judge Vazquez’s ruling “will allow the RNC to work more closely with state parties and campaigns to do what we do best, ensure that more people vote through our unmatched field program.” As a result, the GOP will be able to boost its Election Day turnout operations, including targeting potential voters and get them to the polls, which the Democrats have been able to do but the Republicans have not for 36 years.

Nominated by Obama to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in March 2015, John Michael Vazquez, 47-48, who received his J.D. from Seton Hall University School of Law, was confirmed by the Senate on January 27, 2016, by a vote of 84 to 2.

Thank you, Judge Vazquez, for your fair and judicious ruling.

H/t RevLennel of Reddit

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Fake conservative George Will urges voting against Republicans in November midterm elections

In just 1½ years as President, Donald Trump already has achieved more than Obama in eight years, including:

  • Economy: Unemployment has fallen to 3.8% in May 2018, which is effective full employment. Worker productivity increased 3% in the third quarter of 2017, far above the 1.2% average of the Obama years. The number of manufacturing jobs in November 2017 was the highest recorded increase in 15 years.

rate of unemployment 2008-2018 BLS


Despite all that, writing in the Washington Post last Friday, June 23, supposedly-conservative and supposedly-pro-life Catholic columnist George Will, 77 — one of the Never-Trump Republicans in the 2016 presidential election — urged Americans to vote against Republicans in this November’s midterm elections, not because Congressional Republicans are still too timid, but because they have acceded to President Trump’s “family separating” border policy.

It must be noted that what the jackals of the Mainstream Media call “separation of families” is actually the Trump administration enacting a measure that flowed from the  Clinton-era Flores vs. Reno Supreme Court decision allowing unaccompanied illegal border-crossing minors be held “in the least restrictive setting appropriate to the minor’s age and special needs.”

Rachel Koning Beals reports for Market Watch that Will calls lame duck House Speaker Paul Ryan and others the “president’s poodles,” and Trump’s “zero tolerance” border policy “the most telegenic example of misrule” and “fresh if redundant evidence for the principle by which” independents and moderate Republicans should vote in the November midterms.
Will even says a GOP majority’s position to fill any upcoming Supreme Court vacancies is too high a price to pay for the Trump administration’s executive and legislative “dysfunction”. He writes:

“the congressional Republican caucuses must be substantially reduced. So substantially that their remnants, reduced to minorities, will be stripped of the Constitution’s Article I powers that they have been too invertebrate to use against the current wielder of Article II powers. They will then have leisure time to wonder why they worked so hard to achieve membership in a legislature whose unexercised muscles have atrophied because of people like them. Not because James Madison’s system has failed but because today’s abject careerists have failed to be worthy of it. Congressional Republicans . . . have no higher ambition than to placate this president.”


Earlier this week, longtime Republican strategist Steve Schmidt also called for a Democratic wave in the midterm elections, blaming Trump for a “coarsening of this country” and calling the president a “useful idiot” for Russia.
So Schmidt actually believes in the Russia-Trump 2016 electoral collusion, despite not a shred of evidence? But this guy gets big bucks as a Republican strategist?
Hmm, I can’t help but wonder what dark secrets are in the closets of George Will and Steve Schmidt which they are so terrified would be exposed by “zero tolerance” Trump….

See also:

H/t Gigi
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Normalizing pedophilia & bestiality: Democrat Senate candidate Jerome Segal's campaign ad


Jerome Segal, 74, is a Democratic primary candidate for the U.S. Senate in Maryland.
On June 22, 2018, Anna Masoglia, a writer for Lawyerist.com, tweeted that Segal paid at least $25,464 for a campaign ad in the Washington Post.
Segal begins the ad by identifying himself as a socialist. He then asks his potential voters a series of bizarre, politics-unrelated, non sequitur questions on pedophilia and bestiality:

“Did you ever stare at a picture of a naked child? Full frontal? Did it bring about emotions, ones that might have surprised you?”
“Did you ever watch a video of a three-way, between two men, one white and one black, and a big dog? One a big fellow and another kind [sic] slender? And did you feel strange emotions? Does it come readily back to your mind?”

Segal then asks:

“Did you ever find yourself in close proximity to someone very different, someone you might never want to be seen with, someone whose raw physical needs were right there on the surface? Did it both make you want to run away and make you want to reach out your hand?”

He then assures the reader that those pedophile and bestiality feelings are completely natural:

“Don’t worry. These reactions sometimes happen to all of us. It doesn’t mean you are a socialist. Whew.”

The rest of his long rambling campaign ad is about socialism and capitalism.
He ends the ad with this:

“My name is Jerome Segal. I’m a socialist and proud. I’m happy to be part of the LGBTQ&S community, and you should fess up, and be proud as well.”

Here’s a screen shot of the ad:
Jerome Segal's WaPo campaign ad
According to Wikipedia, Jerome Segal is “an American philosopher and political activist in Silver Spring, Maryland,” a former aide to aide to Congressman Donald M. Fraser, “a research scholar at the University of Maryland and the president of the Jewish Peace Lobby.”
H/t Big League Politics and Voat
See also:

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Beware: Proposal to split California into 3 will create 3 liberal states!

A proposal to split California into three states will be on the ballot this November.
Backers of CAL 3, led by Silicon Valley venture capitalist Tim Draper, collected and delivered 600,000 signatures to California Secretary of State Alex Padilla’s Office, surpassing the 365,000 required by law to qualify for the ballot.
The proposal is to split California into these three new states:

  1. Northern California
  2. California
  3. Southern California

Conservatives should vote “No” for this reason: Instead of giving Conservatives a voice in state government, CAL 3 will make things worse because the way the proposed state lines are drawn will create two, if not three, Democrat-dominant states.
As things are today, California’s one-party Democrat government is the result of the state’s pattern of population distribution, wherein heavily-populated “liberal” metropolitan cities on the coast determine the outcome of elections. Instead of creating a new state of those “liberal” coastal cities, CAL 3 distributes the “liberal” cities to each of the three new states, thereby ensuring that they will dominate election outcomes in the new states.
Here’s the map of the proposed CAL 3:
Note that:

  1. Northern California will contain these big cities:
    1. San Francisco: the 13th most populous city in the U.S., with a population of 884,363 in 2017.
    2. San Jose: the 10th most populous city in the U.S., with a population of 1,035,317 in 2017.
    3. Sacramento: the state capital; 35th largest city in the U.S., with a population of 501,334 in 2018.
  2. California will contain these big cities:
    1. Los Angeles: the 2nd largest city in the U.S. (after New York), with a population estimated at 3.98 million.
    2. Santa Barbara: with a population of 91,196 in 2014.
    3. Long Beach: the 39th largest city in the U.S., with a population of 462,257 in 2010.
  3. Southern California will contain these big cities:
    1. San Diego: the 8th largest city in the U.S., with a population of 1,419,516 in 2017.
    2. Anaheim: the 10th largest city in California, with a  population of 336,265 in 2010.

In the 2016 presidential election, California voted:

  • Hillary Clinton: 61.6%
  • Donald Trump: 32.8%

Here’s a map of how California voted in the 2016 presidential election

Now let’s compare California’s 2016 election results map with a map of CAL 3:

To conclude, the proposed CAL 3 will only split “liberal” California into three “liberal” states. Each of the three states will get to send two senators each to the U.S. Senate, as well as representatives to the House of Representatives. Since each new California state will be dominated by “liberal” heavily-populated cities, that means we’ll end up having even more Democrats elected to both houses of Congress.

Vote “No” on CAL 3 !!!

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

George Soros laments 'Everything that could go wrong, has gone wrong'


What wonderful news to begin our Sunday!
In an interview with The Washington Post published yesterday, referring to the rise of President Trump and anti-establishment parties across the globe, George Soros lamented that “everything that could go wrong, has gone wrong.”
He said he had not expected Trump to be elected President: “Apparently, I was living in my own bubble.”
The evil international financier who’d made his billions by speculating against currencies — which is parasitic as currency-speculation produces neither goods nor services — also made the bizarre claim that President Trump would be “willing to destroy the world.”
Adding to Soros’ distress is the fact that, despite his pumping of $millions into District Attorney races, in California voters rejected every one of his DA candidates.
H/t The Daily Caller and FOTM‘s Stovepipe
Shun Netflix! See “George Soros is a leading shareholder in Netflix“.
~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0