Category Archives: 2016 Election

How Fake News MSM and the democrats lied to you about covid-19 testing

I know this person who is in his late 60’s early 70’s age wise.  He has multiple health problems.  Yesterday he had a problem standing.  He fell down getting out of bed, sometime in the middle of the night.  His landlord/care giver felt it best that the guy went to the hospital to see what the problem was.  His landlord rents a room to him and felt the guy needed to spend some time in a convalescent home.

An ambulance arrives at the house and the ambulance driver doesn’t want to take the guy to the hospital.  He wants the landlord to take the guy.  I thought that was strange.  After a couple of minutes the ambulance driver ends up taking the guy to the hospital.

The guy gets to the hospital.    While checking in they tell him they want him to take a covid-19 test.  He has no symptoms of covid-19.  He shouldn’t.  He doesn’t go anywhere.  His landlord  is pretty much the same way ..   Besides not having any symptoms, that’s not what he’s there for.

The guy ends up having to take the test because the hospital said they were testing everyone that comes in. Pretty odd considering there is a “shortage” of available tests.

They give the guy a look over, the covid-19 test and tell him he need to wait 2 to 3 days for the test results..  Then the hospital sends him on his way to go home or where ever the guy felt like going.

The first thing I did was ask about the conditions about the hospital.  He said  “It was quiet, things were normal.  The tents outside were empty.”.

Then I thought about how testing was going to help slow covid-19 from spreading.  The 2 to 3 day wait is more than enough time to pass it on to several people.  Then I realized testing was a waste of time.  It’s all a scam job.

I’ve mentioned in the past about Presumptive Positive(PP) test.  For those that don’t remember, PP test are not confirmed. They are test waiting to be confirmed.  I knew this was a problem but was unable to put it completely together until the guy I know went to hospital  got tested.

Below, in the image you see screenshots of the most recent data the CDC has available on covid-19.  5 lines down it says “Data includes both confirmed and presumptive positive”.   They don’t provide a list of actual confirmed test separate from PP test.  They don’t provide a list of how many test comes up negative.  They are presenting the data as if every test, which includes PP tests as if they are positive.  They also don’t provided actual causes of death.  A person can be dying of cancer.  They test him for covid-19.  If he dies they put him on the list of covid-19 deaths.

If you take the test you are automatically classified as PP.

You might be thinking “What’s the big deal, people don’t feel good, they have the symptoms. Hospitals are only testing  people with symptoms and those lucky enough to get tested. The people getting tested probably have it” 

This is where the person I know that got tested comes into play.

  1. He didn’t go in for a test.  He didn’t have the symptoms.
  2. The hospital made him test.
  3.  The hospital was testing every person that went there for help.
  4. .  All these test are considered PP.  These get reported to the CDC.
  5. The CDC reports them as positive and adds them to confirmed list

Consider the amount of people entering the hospitals each day.    In 2017, 139 million people made visits to the hospital.  If that were today, everyone would get tested for covid-19.  That’s 139 million PP tests.  CDC would publish it as 139 million cases of covid-19.

Because of this we can assume that every test is going to be considered PP, at the very minimum.  Every test is going to be reported as positive.  This is  why the more people that test, the higher the number of positive cases reported.  Every test is published  as positive by the CDC.  When  there are no test available then the amount of positive test declines.

In the image we can get a idea of how the number of reported positive tests increases and declines with the availability of tests.  We will see a huge increase in the immediate future when more test become available.

The states that had more test sent to them have the highest number of positive test.  You can see the surge in numbers after they took possession of the tests.

Let me finish this up by doing a quick breakdown of what has happened.  Quick generalization.  Many details left out.

  1. As soon as we learned about covid-19 was discovered on cruise ship returning to the USA.  democrats spent most of their time in a over site hearing complaining/predicting a covid-19 pandemic instead of asking questions related to the purpose of hearing.
  2. The Fake News MSM join in and start planting seeds and pushing the same  covid-19 pandemic garbage the democrats are pushing.
  3. Democrats demand that trump listen to the experts and let them handle the situation.  Fake News MSM does the same, backing up the democrats as always.  This was done to keep Trump from seeing the actual data on the web pages.  Trump does not have time to read everything.  He can only work with the information reported to him.  Dr. Fauci was Trump’s “go to” guy   He fed Trump partial information and  straightTout lies.  A distraction.  A traitor.
  4. While this is going on the Fake NEWS MSM is installing fear in the citizens of the USA.
  5. Democrats demand more test kits.  Andrew Cuomo , the loudest, demanding and receiving the most available tests kits.  Ventilators and masks are just part of the con.  Used to provoke fear and panic .  People think they need them to protect them form covid-19 .  Fake News MSM back democrats up on this creating panic.
  6. Pelosi, Cuomo, Dr. Fauci and various democrats, with the help of the Fake News MSM are telling lies, creating panic , creating the false need for the shutdown of the USA.  The covid-19 stimulus bill is a direct result of their deceitful behavior.   They take advantage of the situation and  include addons to the bill that support their agenda.  Addons that would never make it trough on their own.  They do this knowing they will get resistance.  Fully aware they will be able to get some through.
  7. Trump really has no choice but to sign the bill or democrats and Fake News MSM will accuse him of not wanting to help Americans.
  8. Democrats and the Fake News MSM are basically extorting America.  They continue to do it at this very moment.
  9. For the Democrats and the Fake News MSM. it’s Mission accomplished. Unfortunately for them, they got caught.

This is exactly what is going on.  Americans need to step up and do something, say something,  whatever.  Just do not continue to fall for this faux pandemic.  People need to support their president.  It’s far past time that the democrats and The Fake News MSM see justice.   This is an attack on every single American.  There should be no question that the democrats and the Fake News MSM are the enemy of America.

Every American should be angry.  I have reached my end. If I have to take up arms. If I have to give up all my possessions.   If we have a civil war.  If I fall and never get up again while fighting in this war. Any or all is fine by me. I will no longer put up with the lawless, back stabbing, anti American democrats and Fake News MSM.  They need to be taken down. Playtime is over. No Quarter

“Ignorance and obscurantism have never produced anything other than flocks of slaves for tyranny”

“I’d rather die on my feet, than to live on my knees”

Emiliano Zapata Salazar( Emiliano Zapata)

Respectfully,

Deplorable Patriot

Additional sources,

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/testing-in-us.html

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html#investigation

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please follow and like us:
error131
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

The 8chan/8kun QResearch Board Search

I wanted to share this with y’all in case you were not aware of it.

  QResearch.ch,  The 8chan/8kun QResearch Board Search.

Free to use.  No advertising. No tracking.  No porn. No worries.  Just 13,083,277 documents from 38 Qanon related data sources. No loaded  pages from other domains.  Research  with privacy.

If you are into Qanon or just want to see some of the information we have, this is the best place to look.  No login.  No joining.  No vetting.  Just click the link provided at the bottom and start searching.

It’s not like the 8 chan that got shut down.  It’s not like the new 8 Kun.  It’s very simple to use.  You will see the following links at the top of the page for a general search.

For a more detailed search,

  • – specific keywords or keyphrases
  • – specific URL’s
  • – specific dates (e.g. YYYY-MM-DD or YYYY/MM/DD)
  • – specific 8chan/8kun post ID’s

What can you search through?

3,894 Q-Posts from #Qanon
9,738 Answers to Q-Posts from spreadsheet
7,635,941 Posts in 10840 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board
4,045 Posts in 6 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board – AUSTRALIA
2,654 Posts in 4 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board – CANADA
646 Posts in 1 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board – FRANCE
30,265 Posts in 43 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board – GERMANY
1,393 Posts in 2 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board – NETHERLANDS
2,117 Posts in 3 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board – NEW ZEALAND
6,854 Posts in 9 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board – UK
7,311 Posts in 11 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board – Topic ALIEN UFO
6,674 Posts in 9 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board – Topic CLOCKWORK
2,895 Posts in 4 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch Board – Topic NWO
38,440 Posts in 53 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QRB Board
29,619 Posts in 41 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s QResearch2Gen Board
224,669 Posts in 312 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s CBTS Board
30,175 Posts in 43 Threads from 8chan/8kun’s TheStorm Board
37,974 Posts in 54 Threads from Endchan’s qanonresearch Board
5,339 Posts in 15 Threads from Endchan’s qrbunker Board
46,571 Tweets from @realDonaldTrump
12,272 Resignations (since Sep. 1, 2017) from resignation.info
106 Corona Infection Cases from “CoronaVirus Notable Cases”-Spreadsheet
372 Death Cases from deathcas.es
143 Helicopter Crashes from “Helicopter Crashes”-list
2,412 Human Trafficking Arrests (events – since Jan. 1, 2016) from “Notable Human Trafficking Arrests”-list
378,295 Unsealed Indictments from https://bad-boys.us/
2,327 Epstein BlackBook from “Epstein BlackBook”
4,275 Epstein Flight Logs from “Epstein Flight Logs”-list
110 Mass Shootings (events – since 1982) from “Mother Jones – Mass Shootings Database, 1982 – 2019”-list
967 Executive Orders (since 1994) from federalregister.gov
33,709 Hillary Clinton Emails from WikiLeaks
59,148 Podesta Emails from WikiLeaks
44,041 DNC Emails from WikiLeaks
138,185 Bahamas Leaks (Names and Companies) from ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database
168,758 Offshore Leaks (Names and Companies) from ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database
212,321 Panama Papers (Names and Companies) from ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database
171,376 Paradise Papers (Names and Companies) from ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database
3,727,246 White House Visitors (2009-2014) from archives.gov
13,083,277 Total

Click here for main page

 

Credit and thanks to Qanon and all who helped make QResearch.ch available.

QResearch is administered by people that do it as a public service.  Just like everyone here at FOTM, there is no pay.  Just people that care.  Searching for the truth.  Because you deserve it.

WWG1WGA

Respectfully,

Deplorable patriot.

 

Please follow and like us:
error131
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

New study finds liberals gave birth to fewer male babies because of ‘stress’ from 2016 election of Donald Trump

Woman screams at sky because Trump was elected POTUS

This takes Trump Derangement Syndrome to a whole new level.

A study by two Canadian scientists at the Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, found that stress — similar to stress from traumatic societal incidents like terrorist attacks — from the 2016 election of Donald Trump actually led to Canadian leftists (“liberals”) giving birth to fewer male babies.

The scientists are Ravi Retnakaran and Chang Ye; Retnakaran is also with the Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto. Their study is published as “Outcome of the 2016 United States presidential election and the subsequent sex ratio at birth in Canada: an ecological study,” BMJ Open, vol. 10, issue 2.

Below is an excerpt from their article:

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate two main findings. First, Canada’s most populous province experienced a decline in the sex ratio at birth 4 months after the 2016 US presidential election, with subsequent recovery in the 5 months thereafter. This time course of changes in the sex ratio matches that which has been previously described after adverse societal events, such as terrorist attacks. Second, the transient decline in the overall proportion of boys to girls born in Ontario in March 2017 was observed in politically liberal-leaning jurisdictions but not in conservative-leaning regions of the province. Taken together, these data suggest that the unanticipated outcome of the 2016 US presidential election was associated with a temporary reduction in the sex ratio at birth in Canada that may have related to its perception as an adverse societal event by the politically liberal-leaning population.

In humans, despite relative balance in the proportion of spermatozoa carrying a Y-chromosome to those carrying an X-chromosome,22 there is typically a slight preponderance of boys at delivery. This imbalance at birth has been attributed to sex-specific differences in fetal vulnerability during specific time periods in pregnancy.23 Indeed, after initial balance at conception, the sex ratio in humans varies at different timepoints across gestation, with total female mortality in utero ultimately exceeding male mortality (thereby yielding the slight excess of boys at delivery).23 Thus, changes in the sex ratio at birth can reflect the impact of sex-specific differences in fetal loss during pregnancy.

In this context, enhanced loss of male fetuses has been proposed as the mechanistic basis by which adverse societal stressors (such as disasters, terrorism and economic collapse) may lead to a reduction in the sex ratio at birth.3 5 6 From the perspective of evolutionary biology, it has been suggested that, under adverse conditions, the loss of frail male fetuses may be beneficial to the species by yielding a ‘culled cohort’ of healthier males that are better able to reproduce and hence increase the likelihood of survival of the population.5 6 24 Among such societal stressors in humans, discrete events such as terrorist attacks have typically induced a characteristic pattern consisting of a transient decline in the sex ratio 3–5 months later that is believed to reflect comparatively greater male fetal loss during a vulnerable window in mid-pregnancy at around 20–25 weeks’ gestation.10 17 In other words, the greater loss of male fetuses who are within this vulnerable window at the time of the event results in a depression of the sex ratio 3–5 months later when these babies would otherwise have been born. For example, after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the sex ratio fell 3–5 months later in New York,13 California14 and the entire US,15 accompanied by greater male fetal deaths in the intervening months.15 Indeed, this post-event loss of male babies has emerged as an under-recognised contributor to the overall casualty toll after terrorist attacks such as 9/11, the 2011 Norway attacks, and the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.17

Against this background, we hypothesised that the unexpected victory of the nationalist, right-leaning Republican nominee in the 2016 US election and its resultant uncertain global implications could have been perceived as a societal stressor in left-leaning nations and thereby affected the sex ratio in a country such as Canada. Although we cannot definitively ascertain causality with the current study design, three lines of evidence arising from these data support this hypothesis. First, the hypothesised pattern of a transient decline in the sex ratio at birth followed by recovery thereafter was indeed observed in Ontario. Second, although other unrecognised societal factors may also affect the sex ratio, the anticipated decline occurred precisely within the predicted window of 3–5 months following the election, as did the recovery in the 5 months thereafter. Third, this effect was observed in liberal-leaning regions where the population may have perceived the outcome of the election as an adverse societal stressor, but not in conservative-leaning jurisdictions (where it may not have been perceived in this way). It is notable that the pattern of change in the sex ratio in the liberal regions precisely matched that which would occur after a discrete adverse event, with both the nadir 4 months post-election and continuous rise (recovery) over the 5 months that followed (figure 2A and table 2). In contrast, the sex ratio pattern in conservative regions showed neither of these characteristic features (figure 2B and table 2).

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:
error131
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Joe Biden would increase taxes by $4 trillion

With the dropping out of Pete Buttigieg, Amy Kobluchar, and fauxcahontas Elizabeth Warner from the  2020 presidential race, and Buttigieg and Kobluchar’s immediate endorsement of Joe Biden, it looks like the Democrat Party establishment is determined that pedo Joe will be their nominee.

The American people and especially businesses, already buffeted by the economic fallout of coronavirus, should know that Biden is hell bent on raising your taxes.

At a recent campaign appearance, Biden said to a supporter in the audience who said he got a Trump tax cut:

“That’s good. You know what, I’m proud to see you doing well already. Guess what. If you elect me, your taxes are gonna be raised, not cut!

Now we know just how much Biden will raise our taxes.

Naomi Jagoda reports for The Hill that a report released yesterday by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center (TPC), which is led by a former Obama administration official, determined that Biden’s tax proposals would increase taxes by $10.2 trillion:

  • $4 trillion or 1.5% of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) from 2021 to 2030.
  • Another $6.2 trillion in taxes from 2031 to 2040.

About half of the revenue gain in the first decade would come from the proposed tax increases for individuals, and the other half would come from the proposed increases for businesses. 

For individuals, Biden would:

  • Increase taxes on all income groups on average, with the biggest tax increases on the highest-income taxpayers:
    • In 2021, those in the top 1% of income would on average see a tax increase of nearly $300,000, or 17% of their after-tax income.
    • Those with income between $52,000 and $93,000 would see an average tax increase of about $260, or 0.4% of after-tax income.
  • Roll back Trump‘s tax-rate cuts for individuals making more than $400,000.
  • Cap the value of itemized deductions at 28%.
  • Tax capital gains at the same rate as ordinary income for people earning more than $1 million a year.
  • Tax unrealized capital gains at death.
  • Subject earnings above $400,000 to Social Security payroll taxes.

For businesses, Biden would:

  • Increase the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, which would generate about one-third of overall revenue. The corporate tax rate increase will be passed onto consumers, making it in effect a tax increase on American workers and the middle class.
  • Create a 15% minimum tax on the income companies report on their financial statements.
  • Increase the minimum tax on corporations’ foreign earnings from 10.5% to 21%.
  • Reduce tax breaks for the fossil-fuel and real-estate industries, while giving tax incentives for renewable energy and retirement savings.

The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center report points out that Biden’s proposed tax increases are “significantly” higher than those of Hillary Clinton in 2016, which totaled $1.4 trillion or 0.5% of GDP in tax increases over 10 years.

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:
error131
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Joe Biden: ‘If you elect me, your taxes are gonna be raised, not cut!’

It’s déjà vu all over again.

In 2016, the Democratic National Committee deliberately sabotaged Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton. Reportedly, Sanders was threatened with loss of Senate committee position if he didn’t endorse Hillary. The Democratic National Convention even called in a SWAT team on Bernie supporters who peacefully protested in the convention hall with a sit-in, their mouths taped shut.

Of course, for endorsing Hillary, ol’ Bernie was richly rewarded bribed with a third home — a $600,000 lakefront summer home in North Hero, Vermont, which he purchased a mere 5 days after the conclusion of the Convention.

With the abrupt dropping-out of Pete Buttigieg and Amy Kobluchar from the  2020 presidential race, who both then endorsed pedo-Joe Biden, it looks like the Democrat Party, once again, is hell-bent on preventing Bernie Sanders from being their nominee.

With everything that is wrong and deeply disturbing about Joe Biden (see the links below), we can add this one:

Like Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden promises he will raise your taxes!

At a recent campaign appearance, he said to a Biden-supporter in the audience who said he got a Trump tax cut:

“That’s good. You know what, I’m proud to see you doing well already. Guess what. If you elect me, your taxes are gonna be raised, not cut!

 

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:
error131
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

How low will Democrats go?

It should be common knowledge by now that the Democrats have control of California,  People should understand that they do not plan on losing that control.  So they spend most of their time creating an environment that secures their needs while ignoring the needs of Californians.

In the past I have mentioned 2 ways the Democrats have “tweaked” election related laws/rules in California.  One was a change in Ballot harvesting which allowed   persons other than family members to collect and submit ballots.  The second changed how they verified votes that came in the mail after the polls have closed.

These changes only made it easier for people to commit voter fraud.   They had to have known this.  The only logical explanation is they did this because they were planning to exploit the new weaknesses they had just created, by making those two changes. Because of these changes, no election result  in California  should trusted.

Fast forward to today. While reading my mail I made a discovery.   It seems that the democrats have another trick up their sleeve.  This one being so shady that it cannot possibly be legal.

California Presidential Primary election is on Tuesday, March 3, 2020.  In the image is page 7 from the Official Voter Information Guide.  (The Guide is  what the state of California mails out to Californians).  At the top of the page  you will see in bold letters “How to vote for President”.  Below that it reads “Registered to vote as No Party Preference?”.   The next paragraph is problem.

“As a voter registered with No Party Preference, if you want to vote for U.S. President, you must request a primary ballot with presidential candidates from one of the following parties:”

  • American Independent Party
  • Democratic Party
  • Libertarian Party

 

CAELEC

Where it says “you must” is the problem.  Must can be defined as to be obliged to, have to, need to, required to, etc. It’s pretty obvious that this statement is telling people  registered with no party preference that they can only vote for one of those 3 choices.  This is a complete lie.  This state government lying to voters.   They are intentionally misleading voters.  It’s the same at the Secretary of States office.  Here is a link to view their version(same as this).  Click here

This is the same document that the media and various websites are promoting in California.  This is a huge problem.

California has almost 5,700,000 voters registered as No Party Preference.  That’s because of the states push to get people to register to vote.  Now we see why.  The get them signed up then lie to them by telling them they have only three choices.  Notice that Trump isn’t included in those choices.  Notice the Republican party is not one of those three choices.

voter

The truth is that those are not their only choices.  They can vote for Trump.  They just need to register as a republican to vote for him in the primaries.  That’s just for the primaries.    For the general election, they can stay registered as no party preference.  So you see, telling people that if they want to vote for president, “they must” pick one of the three is a complete lie.

At the bottom of the page you will see where they clean it up by saying that you have to register with one of the other parties if you want to vote for their candidate.  They conveniently left out the deadline date which is,  February 18, 2020.

I’ve also provided a page from a county voter guide.  You will notice that they changed the word “must” to “can”.  Plus they included the deadline.

stancountyinfo guide

It does not matter what it says about registering with another party at the lower part of the page.  The top where it says “must” has the biggest impact on people.  They intentionally lied.  The local media is promoting that lie. The damage is done.

I’ve always said the impeachment was a distraction and people should pay attention to what the democrats are doing in the background.  This is a good example.  The democrats are being shady.  That’s all the democrats do.

No election should be trusted in the hands of a democrat.  Nothing should be trusted in the hands of a democrat.  Anybody that lives in a state controlled by democrats should check their voter info guides.  Keep a close eye on the democrats in general.

Respectfully

Deplorable Patriot

Please follow and like us:
error131
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Could Iranian general Qassem Soleimani fake his death if someone gave him a hand?

Before discussing Soleimani there are a couple things to keep in mind that are brought up in these 2  clippings from stories that were published in 2008 and 1990.

In March 2008  the following story was published by Fox News.

The Headline was “Severed Fingers of Kidnapped Westerners Sent to U.S. Officials”

“MIAMI – A senior U.S. official confirmed to FOX News that the severed fingers of five Western hostages were delivered to U.S. government officials in Iraq, giving the men’s relatives hope that they are still alive.

The Austrian weekly magazine News first reported the delivery of the five fingers in Wednesday’s edition, citing unidentified authorities working on the case.   

One of the kidnap victims in Iraq was a University of Florida student. The hostages have been missing for more than a year and U.S. authorities in Baghdad recently were sent their severed fingers.

Four of the men had been working as contractors when they were captured in a brazen ambush of their 43-truck supply convoy on Nov. 16, 2006.The men were working for Crescent Security Group, a Kuwait-based private security company.

They were kidnapped by men in Iraqi police uniforms who ambushed the convoy they were escorting near the southern city of Safwan.Patrick Reuben, a Minneapolis police officer whose twin brother, Paul Reuben, is among the missing, said late Wednesday the FBI told his family that “the fingers were confirmed to be those of the hostages.”

DNA samples had been identified 4 of the hostages.  “John Young of Kansas City, who was seized with them.  None of the fingers belonged to him”.

The story also informs us that the Western hostages appeared in two hostage videos released in December 2006 and January 2007 where demands were made for the United States to withdraw troops from Iraq and to free all Iraqi priosners.

In January, 1990 AP  News ran the following story.

Police: Boy Killed for Ransom from Drug-Dealing Brother

“NEW YORK (AP) _ A kidnapped 12-year-old boy whose finger was cut off to persuade his drug- dealing brother to pay ransom was found dead in a pile of plastic bags just days after the brother was killed, police said Monday.”

In this case the family was able to identify the body without the need for DNA testing.

Hostages severed fingers or other body parts delivered with the kidnappers demands is not a new concept.    The problem is that it doesn’t really prove the hostage is the person they say it is. The only way to know for sure it’s the person is through DNA testing.   This is common knowledge.  It’s the same procedure when it comes to identifying remains of mangled bodies in car accidents,  fire victims or a foot found in the woods without a body attached to it.  If the body is missing or destroyed beyond recognition the only way to get a positive identification is with a DNA test.  In some cases the victim may have some form of identification on them but that is not a 100% guarantee.

“Okay, DNA,  two  stories from 1990 and 2008.  What’s the point?”

These two stories are just 2 examples out of thousands of how body parts have been used to identify people.  The severed fingers story is more relevant to what I am discussing today.  There are 2 main points to keep in mind.  DNA testing was required to identify the identity of the fingers owners.  Second point just proof that people in Iraq completely understand how body parts can be used to prove identity when a complete body is not present.  (Shiite Muslim militias alegedly were the kidnappers of the 4 men)

It’s not inconceivable that people in the Middle East  could fake a persons death and leave a body part behind to to identify  the body.  Perhaps a hand with a ring on one it’s fingers.

“People have faked their own deaths”

  • TOM CAREW, author of “Jihad!” Carew was really Philip Sessarego. Served in the regular British army, not the SAS. Sessarego had faked his death in a car bombing in Croatia and reinvented himself as the dashing Carew in 1993.
  • DAVID FRIEDLAND, New Jersey state senator.  Faked his death in a scuba-diving accident in the Bahamas.
  • JOHN STONEHOUSE,  British Labour lawmaker.  Faked his own death by leaving his clothes in a bundle on a Miami beach in 1974. (20 years after his death it was revealed that Stonehouse had been a Czech spy throughout the 1960s)
  • KEN KESEYK, published novel “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”.  Parked on a cliff-side road in California. In his truck was suicide note.   He wrote “Ocean, Ocean, I’ll beat you in the end” . A friend smuggled him into Mexico in the trunk of his car.

These are just a few examples of people that have faked their own deaths.  Three of these examples were facing jail time.  Each felt they had to escape in order to keep their freedom or to stay alive.

In 2011 Igor Vorotinov’s  dead body was found.  He turned up alive a couple of years later.  He used someone elses body to fake his own death.

Could  Iranian general Qassem Soleimani fake his death if someone gave him a hand?

There is no doubt in my mind that the the drone nailed the vehicles that it targeted. In case you missed it,  below is a video of the airstrike and the aftermath.

 

 

 

 

 

As you can see in the video both vehicles are destroyed.  Obviously, everyone in those vehicles were killed.  So the question is “who were in the vehicles?”

There are mixed stories as to how many people were in the vehicles.  My focus is on just one of the people that we are told was riding in one of the vehicles and is now dead.  That would be Qassem Soleimani.

We are told the missle strike killed him.  I found these 2 photos on Twitter along with the following message,

“Bad Death With One Hundred Virtues Do you, your father, be a martyr of anything? This fate awaits the rest of the IRGC commanders and those around them “

 

*second image is a link because the image is pretty gruesome

Second image click here

 

The tweet didn’t say if the body in the second image was Qassem Soleimani.  To the best of my knowledge, the hand with the ring is all that’s left of him.

This is the part that where I see some problems.  Besides being told Soleimani was in one of the cars, all we have is a hand with a Ring. They have confirmed they belonged to Soleimani simply because he wore a ring with a red stone.

For all we know that hand and ring could belong to this guy, He has a hand.  He has a red ring,

random
Just some Random unknown guy.

 

I went ahead and found some images of  Soleimani while he was wearing his rings. I tried to match them with the ring on the severed hand   My results were that none of the images I found matched  the severed hand.  I’ve provided two images of my comparisons.  You will notice the the setting of the severed hand is different the the rest.  I found additional images and had the same results.sol2

Here is a closer view.

sol1

Sorry, but a severed hand with a ring with a red stone is not enough to convince me.  It’s disappointing that so many people do not question this.  DNA?

I’m sure Trump and Pompeo think the evil general is dead.  That was their mission.  The airstrike was a perfect hit.  Looks like a perfect kill.  I would bet there were US assets on the ground to verify the hit.   But there are some questions that should be asked.

  • It’s this not a  perfect time to take advantage of Trump’s huge ego?
  • I Did anyone pay attention to the plane that Soleimani flew in on?
  • Did anyone see who got off the plane when the two cars departed?
  • Did anyone check the passenger log/crew log?
  • Where was the planes next destination and were it’s passengers?
  • Why did Iran respond with such a weak attack?
  • The US killed their most loved general.  Iran responded by killing how many Americans? Zero.   I really find that hard to believe?
  • In a head to head war, the US would crush Iran and bring it to it’s knees in a few days at the most.  Why is Iran being made out as some huge threat to the USA?
  • The U.S. has pursued Soleimani  for decades The State Department revealed last year that his  operations within Iraq since 2003 killed more than 600 American personnel. He has been sneaking around organizing  terrorist groups or years.  As untounhable as Soleimani thinks he is, he’s not stupid.  He has to know he is a target.   So why was his trip to Iraq not kept in secret?
  • We are told Soleimani went  to Iraq to meet with politicians and military allies.  Trump had planned 8 months ago to take out Soleimani. Around June or July of 2019 Iran claimed to have captured 17 CIA agents.  Is it not possible that some of those captured agents talked?
  • Is it possible Soleimani learned about the hit on him and took precautions.  Maybe the two cars were decoys and he stayed on the plane. Did he fool the world?
  • Soleimani has been reported dead on several occasions in the past.  It didn’t get much attention.  Why all the attention now?
  • Where is the DNA proof?

These are all important questions that require answers.

What it gets down to is  either you trust the information presented to you from the MSM, our government, Iran, Iraq or any other government or you don’t trust it.

Will you accept a severed hand wearing a ring with a red stone as unconditional truth?  Keep in mind that no match was found for the ring.

Remember that In April ,1979,  the current regime had taken control of Iran.
In November,  1979,  Iranian students seized US embassy personnel. Fifty-two hostages were held for 444 days until January 1981.  This was done right after they learned that the  Shah of Iran(ex-leader and king of Iran) went to the United States for cancer treatment.  The current regime has no love for the USA.

No matter how you look at it,  this is something that should be discussed and investigated.

Additional General information on Iran.

This does not include any current spy vs spy,  CIA, etc  operations that may or may not exist.  I like to think this is the minimun amount of knowledege a person should before they can make any sort of accurate analysis on Iran.  Some will say more, some will say less.

FACTUAL KEY HISTORICAL INFORMATION ON IRAN 

This is just review of  what I felt were the key events.  Many events were left out.  The data is still accurate. And the end result the same.

The Nazis were in Iran in WWII. Iran didn’t kick them out. During its occupation by the Nazi’s Iran was controlled by monarch Rezā Shāh. At the Tehran Conference of 1943, the Allies(USA, USSR,GB, France,Australia, etc) issued the Tehran Declaration. It gave Iran independence and boundaries when war ended.(USSR didn’t leave until 1946). Mohammad Reza Pahlavas had taken his fathers place as Shah(King of Iran).  In 1949 He was able to get the Senate of Iran formed. In 1951 Reza(the Shah) appointed Mohammad Mosaddegh as Prime Minister(PM) after he was approved by the Parliament.

Mosaddegh took control of the British built/owned oil refineries which caused problems for Iran.   A British boycott of Iran’s oil had been iniated and enforced. . During Mosaddeh  time as PM part of his land reform act was that land owners give 20% of their land to its tenants. During his time as PM Iran he implemented his socialist ideologies and was destroying Iran’s economy.

In 1951, Realizing that the opposition would take the vast majority of the provincial seats, Mosaddegh stopped the voting when it reached 79 deputies. Just enough to form a parliamentary quorum. He suspended the elections using Foreign influence as the reason.

In 1952.  Mosaddeh made some requests to parliament that would have given him more power in the government, while weakening the Shah’s position. After being denied the request, he resigned.

Mosaddegh loyalist, the National Front, Islamist, Tudeh. socialist parties along with various Nationalist started protest and causing problems. They called for the assassinations of the Shah and other royalists. Major strikes broke out in all of Iran’s major towns, with the Bazaar closing in Tehran. Over 250 demonstrators in Tehran, Ramadan, Ahvaz, Isfahan, and Kermanshah were killed or suffered serious injuries. After 5 days the military quit trying to maintain order.

The shah put Mosaddegh back as PM.  Mosaddegh then managed to get full control of the military. He then continued to work against the Shah until he was removed.

As his dictatorial powers grew, his political supporters were turning on him, By 1953 Mosaddeh had lost a lot of support from members of parliment and others throughout the government, including one of his key political allies, House Speaker Ayatollah AbolGhasem Kashani.

Iranians distrust in Mosaddeh grew. Largley because of the failing economy.  Britain had been boycotting Iran after he took control of British refineries so no money had been coming in from oil.
In April, 1953 in America funds were appoved to be used to pay for activities, operations that could assist in the removal of PM Mosaddegh. Britain wanted its refineries back. America was worried about his close ties to communism(so we are told). Mosaddeh had supporters that were socialist and communist supporters. Part of the CIA’s plan was to make it appear like Mosaddegh he was a communist.
In August 1953, the Shah formally dismissed the prime minister in a written decree, an act that had been made part of the constitution during the Constitution Assembly of 1949. Mossadegh escaped and then turned himself in. He ended up getting 3 years solitary confinement in a military prison in December, 1953. He died under house arrest in 1967. They buried him in his living room. He wasn’t allowed to have a funeral.
Martial law ended in 1957. Iran began modernization economic growth at an unprecedented rate. The US paid for a large part of Irans reconstruction.

In early June 1963 several days of massive rioting occurred in support of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini following the cleric’s arrest for a speech attacking the shah.

In the early 70s region’s strongest military power. Iran had problems with leftist guerrilla groups such as Mujaheddin-e-Khalq (MEK)that attacked the regime along with foreign targets. We are told 1978 the first major demonstrations took place of the Islamic Revolution. The movement, itself, had started long before this date.

In January 1979 Mohammad Reza Pahlavi left the country after strikes and demonstrations paralyzed the country.
In February 1979 Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Tehran.
On February 11, 1979  Iran’s military gave up again declared itself “neutral” after guerrillas and rebel troops overwhelmed troops loyal to the Shah in armed street fighting.
In April 1979 officially became an Islamic Republic.
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini became Supreme Leader of Iran until his death in 1989.
Talking points

MOHAMMAD MOSADDEGH(PM)

Mohammad Mosaddegh was removed because he abused his power. The Shah could have ruled with an Iron Fist, but he chose the route where his country prospers.  When the Shah had regained control of the country. Iran had did exactly that, prosper. Mosaddegh desire for power held Iran back. He reduced the size of the army, Iran’s army couldn’t even keep control of country.  Two times we witnessed this. Ultimately, this is how the Shah lost control of the country. Too small of an army. ( Exactly what Obama was trying to do with the military in the USA. Reduce our army so it could be overpowered.)
Attempting to overthrow a king of a country is usually a penalty of death. Mosaddegh got very lucky.

MORE OBVIOUS TRUTH THAT GET SKIPPED

People keep referring to Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi as a dictator. That simply isn’t true. From 1501 until 1979 Iran had been a monarchy ruled by an emperor almost without interruption. When Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlav replaced his father initially there were hopes that post-occupation Iran could become a constitutional monarchy.

The Shah willingly gave up some of his power and kept a” hands-off role” in government. allowing parliament to hold a lot of power.

“Some elections were held in the first shaky years, although they remained mired in corruption. “Parliament became chronically unstable, and from the 1947 to 1951 period Iran saw the rise and fall of six different prime ministers. Pahlavi increased his political power by convening the Iran Constituent Assembly, 1949, which finally formed the Senate of Iran, a legislative upper house allowed for in the 1906 constitution.”

“His father, Rezā Shāh was all about moderization. He encouraged women not to wear their hijabs. He wanted his people to wear the same type of clothing the people in the west were wearing. He wanted his people to evolve. His mistake was not kicking out the Germans in WWII. They had him convinced that they were going to win the war.
His son Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlav gave Iranians even more freedom.”

The Shah was the one that was overthrown by a dictator, Say yid Ruhollah Khomeini(9 years as Supreme Leader of Iran).
The Supreme leader is above the president in Iran. The current one is Say yid Ali Djamena. Almost 31 years as Supreme Leader.
The Supreme Leader is elected and overseen by the Assembly of Experts. Candidates for membership at the Assembly of Experts (including the President and the parliament are appointed by the Guardian Council, whose members in turn, are appointed by the Supreme Leader.

All directly-elected members of the Assembly of Experts still require the Supreme Leader’s approval even after the Guardian Council’s vetting process.

The supreme leader is considered always right.

The Supreme leader is never questioned.
The Supreme Leader is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces and the provisional head of the three branches of the state the Judiciary, the Legislature, and the Executive
Elections in are currently for show in Iran.

The Supreme leader is a dictator.

Final thoughts

People should be perfectly clear that from the years 501 to 1979 Iran had been controlled by a king or emperor.  Much like Great Britain with an Islamic twist.  The current form of government  has only existed since 1979.  They like to call it a theocracy and presidential democracy.  The truth is the country is controlled by 1 man, the Ayatollah.  He has final say and controll of  everything.  He  cannot be questioned. How would you define him and his role?

The problem is not Iran in general.  The problem is Islamic agression.  Qassem Soleimani isn’t loved because of the country he is from.  He’s not loved because he defends Iran.  All Iranians don’t love him.  He is only loved by Muslims.  He is a soldier of Islam.  He fights for Islam.  That is why Muslims in other countries love him.

You will not find one christian in the Middle East that loves Soleimani.  Not unless they are from America and are a liberal or democrat.  Christian democrats and Christian  liberals in America seem to love Soleimani.  Actually, I’ll rephrase that.  Satan worshipping democrats and Satan worshipping liberals love Soleimani. Iran’s army isn’t the army of Iran, to protect Iran.  It’s the army of Islam, to protect Muslims.

Islam becomes the religion of peace only when every person on the planet is Muslim.

 

 

Always fact check and do your own research.

Respectfully, Deplorable Patriot

*CIA operation “Ajax” took place during the year of 1953

 

Please follow and like us:
error131
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Democrat prez candidate Andrew Yang’s ‘Emperor has no clothes’ moment

Democrat presidential candidate Andrew Yang, 44, is an attorney, entrepreneur, and son of Taiwanese immigrants, with a net worth of $1 million.

See “Net worth of 2020 presidential candidates

Yesterday, Andrew Yang said something quite remarkable, akin to the child in the Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale who alone said the truth — that the Emperor was not wearing any clothes,

On ABC This Week, Yang said no voters are asking him about the impeachment of President Trump, and that Americans are more worried about child and health care costs than they are about impeachment.

Then Yang said something even more remarkable — that the Democratic Party should ask themselves the “hard questions” of why Trump was elected, and that the primary reason why Trump was elected was the economy, specifically Trump’s “capitalizing” on the loss of manufacturing jobs in Midwest swing states.

Yang said (Newsweek):

“It’s clear the reason why Donald Trump is our president today is that we automated away 4 million manufacturing jobs that were primarily based in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Missouri and Iowa – the swing states he needed to win.

And what we did to those jobs we are now going to do to the retail jobs, the call center jobs, the fast food jobs and eventually the truck-driving jobs. We have to have a new way forward that works for all Americans independent of your political affiliation. These problems are technological and apply to us all….

And the Democratic Party, unfortunately, is acting like Donald Trump is the cause of all of our problems. He’s a symptom and we need to cure the underlying disease.

Democrats have still not asked themselves the hard questions about why Donald Trump won in 2016. Where, if you look around the country you see 30 percent of stores and malls closing, you see record-high levels of stress and financial insecurity, student loan debt, even suicides and drug overdoses — these are the problems that voters talk to me about when I’m out there every single day.”

Alas, Yang’s identification of his party’s failure will be to no effect because of this simple reason: the Democratic Party had long abandoned the American worker.

What neither Yang nor any of the other Democrat candidates would admit is that contrary to its traditional image and continuing pretense to be the party of the American worker, the Democratic Party actually had become the party of not just the rich, but the super-rich, and of the globalists. In contrast to the stereotype of the Republican Party being the party of the rich, the GOP is now the party of the middle class and the working poor.

Years before Donald Trump and the 2016 election, the transformation of the two parties was already underway. Over the course of Barack Obama’s two terms as president, the American middle class shifted their allegiance to the Republican Party, while the Democrats became the party of the globalist upper class and of the non-working welfare-dependent lower class, neither of whom are “America First” nationalists or patriots.

See my post of Oct. 22, 2019, “Democrats are now the party of the super-rich; Republicans, party of workers”.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:
error131
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

Brexit’s sore losers are contemptuous elitists just like the American Left

Do you remember this?

And this?

The above are Democrats in the U.S. screaming in frustration after their candidate Hillary “Deplorables” Clinton, the chosen of the globalists (see “The biggest Wall Street whores among 2016 presidential candidates are…” and “Wall Street owns Clintons; Goldman Sachs biggest donor“), lost to Donald Trump.

The Left in the U.K. are just like the Left in the United States.

On December 12, 2019, U.K. voters delivered a devastating defeat to the globalist Labour Party by voting for PM Boris Johnson’s pro-Brexit Conservative Party. Voters gave Johnson the largest Tory margin since the days of Margaret Thatcher. (The Economist)

And this is how the UK Left reacted to their resounding defeat, with riots, denial, and screaming.

And like the American Left, the contemptuous, elitist U.K. Left also dismiss their opponents, many of them are working class, by calling them stupid, uneducated, ignorant, racist and misogynist.

See also “Elites’ contempt for America’s white middle class”.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:
error131
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0
 

If I Were in the House Before the Impeachment Vote …

Cross-posted from trevorloudon.com

I would demand time to speak, then stand at the lectern and declare:

My fellow Members of Congress – and specifically, to my brothers and sisters over on the Democrat side of the aisle – as we embark on a vote as to whether or not to impeach President Donald Trump, I bear witness before you this day.

The history of our civilization, over and over, tells us of how individuals find themselves at the juncture of events that will, with time, prove to be of lasting import, to be monumental – the proverbial “one for the history books” moments.

Yet often at that time and place the individuals themselves do not recognize the full gravity of what is transpiring; as humans we are wont to assess based upon the passions of the moment, our individual preferences and goals, or merely taking the momentary path of least resistance or to avoid potential consequences.

I submit to you that this is one of those times of lasting import. Such times, and the conduct resulting, later prove to have been an immortal test of individuals’ character and integrity. We will eventually pass on – but our actions, or inactions, at this time will become our legacy.

Consider: who now do you believe more likely to be in heaven, and who burning in Hell – those who informed the Gestapo about where Jews were hiding, or those who hid them? Those Vichy who collaborated with the Nazis, or those who joined the Resistance to fight evil?

In this chamber we face mere political unpopularity and, perhaps, loss of enriching political power – consequences which pale in comparison to the potential loss of life confronted by those about whom I just referred, those who stalwartly resisted evil.

By this vote, those of us in this chamber are being tested – and many, perhaps even a majority, will be found wanting – by choosing the transitory path of political expediency and party loyalty.

Indeed, is not this the very essence of temptation – the succumb to immediate satisfaction, but at the long-term detriment of our immortal souls?

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:
error131
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0 0