Category Archives: Congress

Congressman Jason Smith protests Prince Harry’s interference in U.S. presidential election

The British royalty has a tradition of scrupulous non-interference in the UK’s political affairs.

That being so, it is even more imperative that British royals refrain from using their status and prestige to unduly influence other countries’ political affairs by  being partisan.

But that’s exactly what two “woke” members of the British royal family have done in videos released to the public.

They are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, aka Prince Harry, grandson of reigning Queen Elizabeth II and sixth in the line of succession to the British throne, and his D-list Hollywood actress wife Meghan Markle.

Meghan has been vocal in her objection to President Trump. She once said she would never step foot in the United States as long as Donald Trump is President. Of course, like other Hollyweirdos who said they would leave the U.S. if Trump were elected, Meghan’s words also mean nothing, as she and Harry decided to leave their cushy life in the UK to pursue a lucrative Hollywood life in the United States. See:

At least one member of Congress is doing something about it.

He is Rep. Jason Smith (R-Missouri).

Below is Congressman Smith’s letter of protest to British Ambassador Karen Pierce:

I suggest that you contact your Congressperson and Senator to ask them to voice their protests to the British government.

To find and contact your representatives, go here.

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Democrats and farting: Now it’s Rep. Jerrold Nadler

What is it with Demonrats and flatulence?

First, it’s Rep. Ericnuke ’emSwalwell  (D-CA) who, on November 18, 2019,  farted on MSNBC Chris “tingle up my legs” Matthews “Hardball”.

Then, it’s senile, creepy uncle Joe Biden.

Here he is farting, while being fawned upon by Pennsylvania’s Demonrat governor Tom Wolf.

Now, it’s Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), the 73-year-old chair of the House Judiciary Committee who drools.

But Nadler actually did Biden and Swalwell one “better”.

The gurgling sound he made suggests Nadler didn’t just fart, he defecated in his pants.

Must be because Democrats are full of sh*t.

That would explain why so many Demonrat politicians attract flies, flies having an affinity to dung.

Michael Bloomberg

Next, these Demoncrat politicians will start smelling like sulfur.

But wait!

They already do!

See “Secret Service: Hillary and Obama stink like sulfur”.

H/t John Molloy

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

CNN Battle: Dumb (Cuomo) and Dumber (Lemon)

When Chris Cuomo has to school you on US Civics, you’re done. Unless you work for CNN.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

COVID-19 rules are for the little people: Government gyms have been opened for months

Remember House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) violating San Francisco’s COVID-19 ordinances by having her hair done in a hair salon?

While uttering the empty words that she “takes responsibility,” Pelosi did just the opposite by blaming the salon, calling it a “setup” or entrapment.

It turns out Pelosi is not the only hypocritical politician or government employee flouting COVID-19 rules.

Emma Colton reports for the Washington Examiner, Sept. 6, 2020, that gyms within government buildings in San Francisco have been open for months, despite privately owned gyms remaining closed due to the supposed pandemic.

The gyms that have been open for government employees include those for police officers, judges, lawyers, bailiffs, and paralegals, according to the report. One such gym, the Hall of Justice gym, has been open since July 1.

Daniele Rabkin of Crossfit Golden Gate told a local NBC station: “It’s shocking, it’s infuriating. Even though they’re getting exposed, there are no repercussions, no ramifications? It’s shocking.”

Dave Karraker, owner of MX3 Fitness in the Castro, said: “It just demonstrates that there seems to be some kind of a double standard between what city employees are allowed to do and what the residents of San Francisco are allowed to do. What the city has unwillingly done is created this great case study that says that working out indoors is actually safe. So, at this point, we’re just demanding that they allow us to have the same workout privileges for the citizens of San Francisco that the employees of San Francisco have.”

It’s not just government gyms in San Francisco.

Back in March, Silver Tribune reported that although gyms across America were forced to shutter their doors because of the outbreak of the Wuhan virus, one gym seems to be fully operational — the exclusive Senate gym and pool for U.S. members of Congress. 

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Malignant hypocrite: Nancy Pelosi blames hair salon for violating COVID-19 rule

On Monday, August 31, 2020, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) had her hair done in a San Francisco hair salon despite COVID-19 ordinances that have kept salons closed.

Pelosi also violated another COVID-19 rule by not wearing a face mask, as seen in this video obtained by FoxNews:

Pelosi at first claimed that she didn’t know about the local rules.

Then, in a new statement, while saying the empty words that she “takes responsibility,” Pelosi did just the opposite by blaming the salon, calling it a “setup” or entrapment. She claims that the salon had told her it was okay. Then Pelosi has the unmitigated chutzpah of demanding an apology from the salon. The Speaker of the House said (Townhall):

“I take responsibility for trusting the word of the neighborhood salon that I’ve been to…many times…It was a set up, and I take responsibility for falling for a setup. I think that this salon owes me an apology, for setting me up”

That makes Nancy Pelosi not just a hypocrite, she’s a malignant hypocrite.

Erica Kious, the owner of the hair salon, has independent stylists working for her who rent chairs in her salon.

In this interview with Tucker Carlson, Kious makes clear that Pelosi’s claim that she had been “setup” is bogus because it was Pelosi who initiated the salon visit by having her assistant call the stylist to set up the appointment.

Nor is Pelosi’s excuse that hair salons can operate as long as it’s an “one-on-one” service, i.e., only one client is admitted into the salon, true. Kious states her salon remains closed because of the city’s COVID-19 rule.

A GoFundMe to help Erica Kious relocate her salon and her family because of threats she’s received took in more than $200,000 in its first hours of existence. (Washington Times)

The GoFundMe’s goal is to raise $300,000. As of the time of this post, the fund drive has raised $284,573. To donate, go here.

UPDATE (Sept. 10, 2020)

San Francisco Chronicle photo journalist Jessica Christian reports that on Sept. 3, a group of women who described themselves as “angry salon customers” who want their hair and nails done, protested peacefully, unlike #BLM, in front of Pelosi’s San Francisco home.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Taxpayer-funded NPR promotes Marxist author who defends looting

National Public Radio (NPR) is a non-profit media organization based in Washington, D.C., which is partly funded by taxpayers. Established by an act of Congress, the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, most of NPR’s member stations are owned by government entities (often public universities). NPR is a national syndicator to a network of over 1,000 public radio stations across the United States.

NPR’s flagship shows are two commute-time news broadcasts, Morning Edition and All Things Considered in the afternoon, which are carried by most NPR member stations, and are among the most popular radio programs in the country. As of March 2018, the two programs attract an audience of as many as 14.9 million and 14.7 million per week respectively.

According to a report by the federally-funded Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), in 2018, U.S. taxpayers accounted for 32% of public broadcasting revenue of public radio and TV stations. The tax-based revenue of public broadcasting is comprised of:

  1. Federal government grants and contracts.
  2. State and local government sources:
    • State and local taxes
    • Tax-supported colleges and universities

Given U.S. taxpayers’ funding of public radio, it is nothing less than outrageous that on August 27, 2020, NPR aired a sympathetic interview of Vicky Osterweil, author of In Defense of Looting, who justifies looting as “a powerful tool to bring about real, lasting change in society.”

NPR reporter Nastalie Escobar begins her interview with Osterweil with an introduction in which Escobar’s choice of words (in bold red below) shows her lack of journalistic objectivity and impartiality:

In the past months of demonstrations for Black lives, there has been a lot of hand-wringing about looting…. [P]olice officers, government officials and pundits alike have bemoaned the property damage and demanded an end to the riots.

The Oxford Dictionary defines hand-wringing as “The excessive display of concern or distress” and bemoan as “complain”. Escobar’s use of those two words clearly implies her disapproval of the criticisms about looting and, therefore, her approval of looting.

Below are some quotes by Vicky Osterweil from the interview:

“When I use the word looting, I mean the mass expropriation of property, mass shoplifting during a moment of upheaval or riot. That’s the thing I’m defending. I’m not defending any situation in which property is stolen by force.”

Note Osterweil’s unique and utterly perverse definition of looting as not property stolen by force.

She claims the word “looting” is racist:

“Looting is a highly racialized word from its very inception in the English language. It’s taken from Hindi, lút, which means “goods” or “spoils,” and it appears in an English colonial officer’s handbook [on “Indian vocabulary”] in the 19th century.”

For Osterweil, looting is a Robin Hood-like noble enterprise:

“[L]ooting is more common among movements that are coming from below. It tends to be an attack on a business, a commercial space, maybe a government building — taking those things that would otherwise be commodified and controlled and sharing them for free…. It gets people what they need for free immediately, which means that they are capable of living and reproducing their lives without having to rely on jobs or a wage — which, during COVID times, is widely unreliable or, particularly in these communities is often not available, or it comes at great risk.”

Osterweil is a Marxist. She views looting as a means toward equity in an unjust, capitalist society:

“It attacks the idea of property, and it attacks the idea that in order for someone to have a roof over their head or have a meal ticket, they have to work for a boss, in order to buy things that people just like them somewhere else in the world had to make under the same conditions. It points to the way in which that’s unjust. And the reason that the world is organized that way, obviously, is for the profit of the people who own the stores and the factories. So you get to the heart of that property relation, and demonstrate that without police and without state oppression, we can have things for free.”

Black Lives Matter looting is a strike against “white supremacy”:

“Importantly, I think especially when it’s in the context of a Black uprising like the one we’re living through now, it also attacks the history of whiteness and white supremacy. The very basis of property in the U.S. is derived through whiteness and through Black oppression, through the history of slavery and settler domination of the country. Looting strikes at the heart of property, of whiteness and of the police. It gets to the very root of the way those three things are interconnected. And also it provides people with an imaginative sense of freedom and pleasure and helps them imagine a world that could be. And I think that’s a part of it that doesn’t really get talked about — that riots and looting are experienced as sort of joyous and liberatory.”

You can read the rest of totally-biased reporter Natalie Escobar’s sympatico interview of Vicky Osterweil the Marxist here.

Below is an example of the looting defended by Osterweil and, by implication, NPR reporter Escobar — the looting of an Amazon Prime truck during a BLM George Floyd riot in Los Angeles on May 31, 2020. (H/t Maziel):

#DefundNPR !

By the way, if you thought Vicky Osterweil’s pic to be odd looking, this is why: Osterweil is a transvestite. From James Fetzer’s blog:

The Federalist writes-  Osterweil is a transgender male who calls himself a “writer, editor, and agitator.” His Twitter handle is Vicky_ACAB. ACAB means “all cops are b-stards.”

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

The real story: It’s not just a few big Democrat cities that are burning

Demorats have generally ignored rioting in the streets and have suggested that President Trump is the cause of any social disruption. Mainstream media have suggested that the rioting is confined to half a dozen big cities. Republicans have blamed Demorat mayors and governors for not bringing the riots under control.

But fact is, none of us are getting the true picture of what is happening to this country. Protests and riots have occurred in all 50 states. The Army National Guard has been deployed to at least 23 states and the District of Columbia to combat rioters and looters. More than 350 cities and towns have been wracked with unrest—all this while left-wing socialist/communist government officials sit in complacent approval of the mayhem.

Our country is coming apart at the seams. Nero fiddles while Rome burns.

What follows is research published on June 2, 2020 by Mohammed Haddad, writing for Aljazeera. These data are more than two months old.

I have to wonder, how much worse is it now?

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/interactive/2020/06/mapping-cities-george-floyd-protests-erupted-200601081654119.html

~ Grif

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Elizabeth Warren slyly signals she supports Marxist BlackLivesMatter at 2020 DNC

Yesterday, Sen. Fauxcahontas Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) “appeared” by Zoom at the 2020 Demonrat National Convention to endorse senile Joe Biden for POTUS.

If you watched the DNC, you would have seen Warren speaking from the Early Childhood Education Center in Springfield, Massachusetts, posing before a wall of colorful pictures drawn by children.

But if you look closely at the wooden book shelf behind her, you would see that Warren was slyly signaling her support for Black Lives Matter (BLM).

See the block letters B L M? (I circled the letters in yellow.)

After tweeters noted the BLM block letters behind Warren, her former deputy chief-of-staff and former presidential campaign communications director Kristen Orthman said Warren concocted the idea to “honor” BlackLivesMatter and that she wanted the BLM block letters to be visible in the camera shot. (ABC News)

Black Lives Matter is more than a movement for “racial justice”.

We have BLM’s co-founder Patrice Cullors on video describing herself and fellow BLM organizers as “trained Marxists”. BLM also advocates the defunding of police nationwide. (See “Black Lives Matter is Marxist; will be armed; wants police defunded nationwide“)

This the toxic movement that Elizabeth Warren “honors”.

Elizabeth Warren is the only professor that I know who, with her husband, also a law professor, somehow managed to accumulate a $12 million fortune.

H/t James Woods, Maryaha and DCG for the above pic!

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Republican Congressional nominee in Maryland wants you to know what’s really going on in Baltimore

Meet Kimberly Klacik, a Congressional candidate for Maryland District #7.

She’s put out an effective campaign video that pretty much summarizes what inner cities have become under decades of demorat rule. Watch here:

Hopefully the citizens of Baltimore will wake up!

Read more about Kimberly here.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

The Chinese Communist Party has your data and a lot more.

The Chinese Communist Party(CCP) has your data. The thought of them not having it never entered my mind.  How did it happen?

CCP gains control (short version)

During WWII Japan had occupied about 25% of China. During that time there were three armies at war with each other in China. The Chinese Communist Party(CCP) was at war with the Chinese Nationalist.  Both were at war with Japan.

Japan  had invaded China prior to its involvement in WWII.  Japan’s  weapons were far superior and had air superiority. This combined with a plethora of other problems, China was unable to beat Japan.

By the time Japan was removed from China they had killed at least 25 million Chinese and had committed thousands of war crimes.

During WWII America started helping Chinese Nationalist with there problem with Japan.  After America dropped 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, Russia declared war on Japan.  The result was Japan’s surrender. The CCP says they defeated Japan but it was the Americans and Russia, with the help of Chinese Nationalists that beat Japan.

With Japan out of the picture By 1949 the CCP had defeated the Chinese Nationalist.

It was the 1st of October in 1949 when the leader of the Chinese Communist Party(CCP), Mao Zedong declared the creation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

I don’t want to get into details about China’s government structure or their  domestic problems but I will say they have a congress, a president and a judicial branch. It should be noted that their roles are not the same as we have here in the USA. For example, their role of president is primarily a ceremonial role with limited powers.

With that being said, the current president, Xi Jinping, is still the most powerful person in China.  Not because he is president…

President Xi Jinping  is also the paramount leader,. His real power comes from being the General Secretary of the Communist Party,. He is also the general secretary of the Central Committee, and Chairman of the Central Military Commission..

The thing to remember is that the CCP has  total control of China.

Xi  once borrowed a line from China’s first president Mao Zedong: “Government, military, society, education, north, south, east, west—the party leads everything.”

 Xi wants China to  be the super power of the world. He wants the world dependent on China.  He wants other nations  to look at China for leadership like they  look at the USA.  

Should we trust China?  Is China a threat to the USA?  I won’t tell you who you should  trust. That’s  for you to decide, but I will say “yes. China is a threat”

Have you ever heard of Title 7 of China’s national intelligence law? It makes every Chinese National a potential spy.

 

The following comes from an article H.R. McMaster’s wrote, which includes parts written by Howard W. French.

“China intends to establish a new tributary system through a massive effort organized under three overlapping policies, carrying the names “Made in China 2025,” “Belt and Road Initiative,” and “Military-Civil Fusion.”
“Made in China 2025” is designed to help China become a largely independent scientific and technological power. To achieve that goal, the party is creating high-tech monopolies inside China and stripping foreign companies of their intellectual property by means of theft and forced technology transfer. In some cases, foreign companies are forced to enter into joint ventures with Chinese companies before they are permitted to sell their products in China. These Chinese companies mostly have close ties to the party, making routine the transfer of intellectual property and manufacturing techniques to the Chinese government.”
“The “Belt and Road Initiative” calls for more than $1 trillion in new infrastructure investments across the Indo-Pacific region, Eurasia, and beyond. Its true purpose is to place China at the hub of trade routes and communications networks. While the initiative at first received an enthusiastic reception from nations that saw opportunities for economic growth, many of those nations soon realized that Chinese investment came with strings attached.”
“The Belt and Road Initiative has created a common pattern of economic clientelism. Beijing first offers countries loans from Chinese banks for large-scale infrastructure projects. Once the countries are in debt, the party forces their leaders to align with China’s foreign-policy agenda and the goal of displacing the influence of the United States and its key partners. Although Chinese leaders often depict these deals as win-win, most of them have just one real winner.”
The Military-Civil Fusion policy is the most totalitarian of the three prongs. In 2014 and then again in 2017, the party declared that all Chinese companies must collaborate in gathering intelligence. “Any organization or citizen,” reads Article 7 of China’s National Intelligence Law, “shall support, assist with, and collaborate with the state intelligence work in accordance with the law, and keep the secrets of the national intelligence work known to the public.” Chinese companies work alongside universities and research arms of the People’s Liberation Army. Military-Civil Fusion encourages state-owned and private enterprises to acquire companies with advanced technologies, or a strong minority stake in those companies, so that the technologies can be applied for not only economic but also military and intelligence advantage. It fast-tracks stolen technologies to the army in such areas as space, cyberspace, biology, artificial intelligence, and energy. In addition to espionage and cybertheft by the Ministry of State Security, the party tasks some Chinese students and scholars in the U.S. and at other foreign universities and research labs with extracting technology.”
“Sometimes U.S. defense funding supports China’s technology transfers. One of many examples is the Kuang-Chi Group, described in the Chinese media as “a military-civilian enterprise.” The Kuang-Chi Group was founded largely on the basis of U.S. Air Force–funded research into meta-materials at Duke University.”

If you have been paying attention and  doing your own research  you might  agree with  French and McMasters. I’m not a fan of McMasters political career in the White House but on this topic he appears to be on target.

Here are 7 more quotes of McMasters.

  1. “Chinese espionage is successful in part because the party is able to induce cooperation, wittingly or unwittingly, from individuals, companies, and political leaders. Companies in the United States and other free-market economies often do not report theft of their technology, because they are afraid of losing access to the Chinese market, harming relationships with customers, or prompting federal investigations.”
  2. “Many universities, research labs, and companies in countries that value the rule of law and individual rights are witting or unwitting accomplices in China’s use of technology to repress its people and improve the Chinese military’s capabilities. For dual-use technologies, the private sector should seek new partnerships with those who share commitments to free-market economies, representative government, and the rule of law, not with those acting against these principles. Many companies are engaged in joint ventures or partnerships that help China develop technologies suited for internal security, such as surveillance, artificial intelligence, and biogenetics. In one of many examples, a Massachusetts-based company sold DNA-sampling equipment that has helped the Chinese government track Uighurs in Xinjiang. (The company has ended such sales.) Companies that knowingly collaborate with China’s efforts to repress its own people or build threatening military capabilities should be penalized.”
  3. “Many Chinese companies directly or indirectly involved in domestic human-rights abuses and violation of international treaties are listed on American stock exchanges. Those companies benefit from U.S. and other Western investors. Tougher screening of U.S., European, and Japanese capital markets would help restrict corporate and investor complicity in China’s authoritarian agenda. Free-market economies like ours control the majority of the world’s capital, and we have far more leverage than we are employing”
  4. “China’s use of major telecommunications companies to control communications networks and the internet overseas must be countered. There should no longer be any dispute concerning the need to defend against the multinational technology company Huawei and its role in China’s security apparatus. In 2019, a series of investigations revealed incontrovertible evidence of the grave national-security danger associated with a wide array of Huawei’s telecommunications equipment. Many Huawei workers are simultaneously employed by China’s Ministry of State Security and the intelligence arm of the People’s Liberation Army. Huawei technicians have used intercepted cell data to help autocratic leaders in Africa spy on, locate, and silence political opponents. A priority area for multinational cooperation among free societies should be the development of infrastructure, particularly 5G communications, to form trusted networks that protect sensitive and proprietary data.”
  5. “We must defend against Chinese agencies that coordinate influence operations abroad—such as the Ministry of State Security, the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Students and Scholars Association. At the same time, we should try to maximize positive interactions and experiences with the Chinese people. The United States and other free and open societies should consider issuing more visas and providing paths to citizenship for more Chinese—with proper safeguards in place. Chinese who engage with citizens of free countries are the ones who are most likely to question their government’s policies—whether from abroad or when they return home.:”
  6. “The U.S. and other free nations should view expatriate communities as a strength. Chinese abroad—if protected from the meddling and espionage of their government—can provide a significant counter to Beijing’s propaganda and disinformation. Investigations and expulsions of Ministry of State Security and other agents should be oriented not only toward protecting the targeted country but also toward protecting the Chinese expatriates within it.”
  7. “Without effective pushback from the United States and like-minded nations, China will become even more aggressive in promoting its statist economy and authoritarian political model. For me, the state visit to Beijing—and exposure to China’s powerful combination of insecurity and ambition—reinforced my belief that the United States and other nations must no longer adhere to a view of China based mainly on Western aspirations. If we compete aggressively, we have reason for confidence. China’s behavior is galvanizing opposition among countries that do not want to be vassal states. Internally, the tightening of control is also eliciting opposition. The bravado of Li Keqiang and other officials may be intended to evoke the idea of China as sovereign of “everything beneath heaven,” but many beneath heaven do not, and must not, agree.

 

Because of China’s skill in propaganda and the enormous amount of fake news I can understand how some people might not be aware of  Xi’s ambitions, the CCP’s behavior and how China has infiltrated  America.  If you are one of those people,  you shouldn’t be in the dark any longer. McMasters analysis is accurate. Clearly he sees that any American interaction with China, be it a partnership, investment, opening a business in china, helping a Chinese National open a business in America  or any involvement with China is not in the best interest of America
  It only creates opportunity for espionage.
 What the average person sees as a business transaction he probably sees a opportunity  for espionage. I get the impression that he knows that chinese espionage  occurs  daily in the USA.
  Under the current conditions with China, I’m sure he would like to see all activities with China  stop unless immediate action is taking to stop the espionage.  I agree with him because he’s right.(on this matter).
*McMasters  remarks come from his book, Battlegrounds: The Fight to Defend the Free World by H. R. McMaster.  

They can also be found at kyotoreview.org, chinas-three-pronged-strategy-on-regional-connectivity

And https://nationalcybersecurity.com/h-r-mcmaster-what-china-wants-espionage-surveillance-ceo-businesssecurity/

Now that you know what you thought to be true about the CCP and China is actually true, take a look around and see if anything from China has spilled over into your life.

I looked around and found that in both goods and services, China has been in my life for quite a long time..

China is everywhere in the USA. They own property, businesses, banks and politicians. They have also had quite a bit of success on the internet..  That’s  where we need to pay close attention. No one should be using Chinese apps

We see Tencent Holdings all over the news.  They definitely are a security risk. They have access to millions of Americans. They have large amounts of cash invested in American companies. Reddit  and Discord are popular platforms  that Tencent has invested substantial amounts of money.

I’ve talked about this in the past.  You don’t  give 150 million dollars to someone (Reddit) and  say “here’s  my money, contact me when you turn a profit.”  That money gives them partial ownership of the company.  That money gets them influence throughout the whole company.  That influence finds its way to the customer. If you use Reddit, you can be sure Tencent Holdings has some of your data. Don’t forget platforms like Reddit have influence in our elections.

Personally, I think it’s  too late.  China, the CCP has our data.  They have  also infiltrated our government.  What we need to do is remove the problem and see that it doesn’t  happen again. I know exactly who should be the first to go.

There is one company that I think poses the most danger to our country.  It’s  how the CCP has managed to find it’s way into you and your families daily lives.  It’s  worked its  way into  our government and is able to influence voters in our elections..  I’m talking about ZOOM.  The same company that schools use to teach children. The same company that has been making millions during the pandemic. The only company that I’ve seen under investigation by the FBI because of a security risk, but was still authorized for use in our government…(see image).

 

 

For PDF click here

You might be saying, ” ZOOM is an American company, what’s  the problem?”

Here are a few example problems of many .   While reading it, keep in mind article 7 and everything else McMasters mentioned.

Sequoia Capital  has a minimum investment  of 100 million dollars in Zoom.. Sequoia is listed on “Our team” page at Zoom.  The firm has offices in Menlo Park, Singapore, Bengaluru, Mumbai, New Delhi, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Beijing, and Tel Aviv.   Sequoia has numerous investors located in China.  Zoom  has many big investors with branches in China.  Think Article 7 + more.

Zoom as of January 2020 has 2,532 full time employees.  1,396 worked in the USA. Around 700 of the remaining employees work at their research and development location in China. This location alone is a huge risk. To make improvements, research and development is going to need data.  User data..  The facility in China will have employees that are hired locally.  China wouldn’t allow the business exist there if they didn’t. Article 7 risk + more

Zoom cannot guarentee their investors that data and intellectual property under their control is safe. In their annual report they admit that they have had security breaches in the past and imore breaches  they cannot defend against will happen in the future.  Thay also  admit that in some countries they may not be able to protect data. Below is documentation  where they mention these security risks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zoom  has history of getting caught routing data to China.  They say “it was a mistake.  It’s the only time it has ever happened.”  I see it like this, You catch a long time employee stealing. They say it was their first time.  I say, “no. It’s the first time they  got caught. They’ve been stealing since the beginning.”  ZOOM had been doing it since day one.

Taiwan banned zoom for routing data to China.

Singapore teachers banned zoom because of hackers.

ZOOM = PROBLEMS

The following are screenshots of search results that come up when I Google Zoom.

 

So how did Zoom get approved for government  use? FedRamp approved  Zoom.  FedRamp is. part of the General Services administration (GSA) . Technically GSA is part of the executive branch, but it functions on its own.

I believe  Trump saw some problems with FedRamp in 2017.  He signed in an executive order that made the head of departments solely responsible for online security in their departments.

Link

  1. Democrats decided to rewrite FedRamp and pass legislation on it. What they did was create  more non elected job positions that have access to data  in information they shouldn’t be allowed to have loopinformation non elected people should not have.  One of the positions would give them access to Executive  branch information/activity congress has never had in the past.  Basically Democrats created a “mole” that was to report to congress  Another example of Democrats overreach. They created an additional 20 million dollar expense taxpayers neverr had before..

On February 5, 2020 when democrats and the fake news started  advancing their planned pandemic, the democrats in congress suspended the rules and passed the FedRamp rewrite.

Link

When it comes to Zoom, you will see democrats complaining about Zoom.  Personally I think it’s  part of their grift they are pulling on the USA. They do it to control the  conversation.  That way when a real problems comes along they can say “were on it, we see the problem and were taking care of it”.  It’s the only solution I could come up with.  Zoom is on the democrats top donor list.  100% of donations to political parties made by Zoom goes to the left. They are protecting Zoom.

The man behind the donations is the founder and current CEO of Zoom.

Eric S. Yuan(Yuán Zhēng) , Born in 1970, in China. He moved to the USA in 1997 . One of the founders of WebEx, Min Zhu  gave him a job.  WebEx was aquired by Cisco in 2007. He left the company in 2011 after making a pitch and getting denied. That’s when he started his first business which led to his first release  of Zoom in 2012..

,,*Yuan once mentioned that WebEx is still using code he wrote in 1998

*After his failure of promoting his idea, he left and took his idea with him.  It’s always been my understanding that any ideas you come up with while working for a company,  those ideas belong to the company and you cannot take them with you.

*Min Zhu resigned in 2005 and left the USA.. “Zhu continues to serve as a science and technology advisor to the municipal government of San Jose,”

“It does not surprise me that San Jose, located in California would have a citizen of a foreign communist country. as their science and technology advisor. It goes hand in hand with the lawless behavior of the democrat party in California.  The situation that  requires more attention in California  is Governor Newsom hijacking  the residents of California pandemic relief  unemployment insurance money. Parents and their children are starving losing their homes because they have not received their money from the federal government.  Newsom blames  the unemployment office but he is the only person that can stop the flow of money. 
What also requires attention is Newsom forcing mail in ballots.  Even if you go to a polling place to vote they give you a mail in ballot.  It shouldn’t be anymore obvious what the Democrats are doing. They’re rigging the election.

If any  American corporations have  branch locations in China, business partners or accepted big investments out of China and say they don’t have any security  risks, they are lying.  With the current laws in China, any involvement with China is a open door for espionage.  This is not a conspiracy theory, This is a fact. A person only needs to take a minute to look at some of their laws.

National Intelligence Law of the People’s Republic of China

Chapter I: General Provisions

Article 1: In order to strengthen and guarantee national intelligence work, and safeguard national security and interests, on the basis of the Constitution, this Law is formulated.

Article 2: National intelligence work shall persist in an overall national security view, provide intelligence reference for major national policy decisions, provide intelligence support for preventing and dissolving risks endangering national security, and safeguard the national regime, sovereignty, unity, independence and territorial integrity, the prosperity of the people, economic and social sustainable development and other major national interests.

Article 3: The State establishes and completes a concentrated and united national intelligence structure with a coordinated division of work, which is scientific and highly effective.

Central and State security leadership bodies exercise uniform leadership over national intelligence work, formulate principles and policies for national intelligence work, standardize the overall development of national intelligence work, establish and complete coordination mechanisms for national intelligence work, comprehensively coordinate national intelligence work in all areas, research and decide upon major matters in national intelligence work.

The Central Military Commission uniformly leads and organizes military intelligence work.

Article 4: National principles shall persist in the principles of the integration of open work and classified work, the integration of specialized work and the mass line, and the integration of division of work and responsibilities, and coordination and cooperation.

Article 5: Intelligence organs of national security bodies and public security bodies, as well as military intelligence organs (hereafter jointly named national intelligence work organs) will, according to the division of work and responsibilities, provide mutual assistance, do intelligence work and launch intelligence activities well. All relevant national bodies shall, on the basis of their duties, tasks and the division of work, cooperate closely with national intelligence work organs.

Article 6: All national bodies, military forces, political parties, social groups, enterprise and undertaking organizations, as well as citizens, shall support, cooperate with and collaborate in national intelligence work, and maintain the secrecy of national intelligence work they are aware of.

Article 7: National intelligence work shall be conducted according to the law, respect and guarantee human rights, and safeguard the lawful rights and interests of citizens and organizations.

Article 8: The State supports individuals supporting or assisting in national intelligence work, and rewards those making major contributions.

Chapter II: National intelligence work organs and powers

Article 9: National intelligence work organs launch intelligence work inside and outside of the borders on the basis of work requirements, and by using the necessary methods, means and channels according to the law.

Article 10: National intelligence work organs shall lawfully collect and process relevant information on foreign bodies, organizations and individuals engaged in, or inciting or assisting others to engage in, or domestic bodies, organizations and individuals who collude with foreign bodies, organs or individuals to engage in harm to the national security and interests of the People’s Republic of China

Article 11: Foreign bodies, organizations or individuals engaging in acts harming the national security and interests of the People’s Republic of China within Chinese borders must be punished by law. National intelligence work organs shall provide intelligence reference and evidence for preventing, curbing and punishing the abovementioned acts.

Article 12: National intelligence work organs may establish a collaborative relationship with relevant individuals and organizations, and entrust them with carrying out relevant work.

Article 13: Relevant departments in all levels’ People’s Governments, enterprise and undertaking work units, other organizations and citizens shall provide the necessary assistance to national intelligence work organs lawfully carrying out their work, and maintain secrecy.

Article 14: National intelligence work organs may, on the basis of work requirements and according to relevant State regulations, after undergoing strict approval procedures, adopt technological reconnaissance measures.

Article 15: National intelligence work bodies’ personnel may, when lawfully exercising their duties, according to relevant State regulations, with permission and after showing corresponding credentials, acquaint themselves with relevant bodies, organizations, enterprise or undertaking work units and individuals, inquire into relevant circumstances, consult or obtain relevant files, materials and goods.

Article 16: National intelligence work organs’ personnel may, when lawfully exercising their duties, according to relevant State regulations, with permission and after showing corresponding credentials, enter relevant limited-access localities and premises; they are also permitted to enjoy passage privilege to carry out urgent task requirements, after showing corresponding credentials.

National intelligence organs’ work personnel may, on the basis of work requirements and according to relevant State regulations, use with priority or lawfully commandeer transportation equipment, telecommunications equipment, spaces and buildings of bodies, organizations, enterprise and undertaking work units and individuals, when necessary, they may set up relevant work premises, equipment and facilities, after completion of the task, they shall timely restore or recover the original state, and pay corresponding fees according to regulations; where damage is caused, it shall be compensated.

Article 17: National intelligence work organs may, on the basis of work requirements and according to relevant State regulations, request Customs, border control, inspection and quarantine and other such bodies to provide exemption from inspection and other such conveniences.

Article 18: National intelligence work organs and their work personnel shall, during work, strictly act according to the law, they may not exceed their powers, abuse their powers, or engage in irregular favouritism, they may not violate the lawful rights and interests of citizens and organizations, and may not divulge State secrets, commercial secrets or personal privacy.

Chapter III: National intelligence work guarantees

Article 19: The State strengthens the construction of national intelligence work organs, exercises special management over their organic structuring, staffing, personnel allocation, funding and assets, and provides special guarantees.

The State establishes personnel employment, recruitment, assessment, training, remuneration and retirement management structures suited to intelligence work.

Article 20: National intelligence work organs shall adapt to intelligence work requirements, and raise their ability to carry out intelligence work.

Article 21: When the personal security of national intelligence work organs’ personnel or their close relatives is threatened due to their exercising their task, or the personal security of individuals with whom national intelligence work bodies have established a cooperative relationship or their close relatives is threatened because of their assistance to national intelligence work, relevant State departments shall adopt the necessary measures to provide protection and succour.

Article 22: Public security, civil affairs, finance, health, education, human resources and social security, as well as other relevant departments and State-owned enterprise and undertaking work units shall cooperate with national intelligence work bodies to properly arrange for persons in need of placement due to contributions to national intelligence work.

Article 23: National intelligence work organs shall establish supervision and security inspection structures, conduct supervision of their personnel’s observance of discipline, and lawfully adopt the necessary measures to regularly or irregularly conduct security inspections.

Article 24: Any individual or organization has the right to report and accuse instances of national intelligence work organs and their personnel exceeding their powers, abusing their powers, engaging in irregular favouritism and other unlawful acts to higher-level organs or relevant departments. Relevant organs or departments receiving reports and accusations shall timely investigate the matter, and report the investigation results to the reporter or accuser.

No other person or organization may suppress or retaliate against individuals or organizations lawfully reporting on or accusing national intelligence work organs and their personnel.

Chapter IV: Legal liability

Article 25: Those violating the relevant provisions of this Law and impede national intelligence work organs and their personnel from carrying out intelligence work, will be punished by relevant work units on suggestion of the national intelligence work organ, or be subject to a warning of administrative detention of less than 15 days by the national public security body, or public security bodies; where it constitutes a crime, legal liability will be prosecuted according to the law.

Article 26: Those divulging State secrets involving national intelligence work, will be punished by relevant work units on suggestion of the national intelligence work organ, or be subject to administrative detention of less than 15 days by the national public security body or public security bodies; where it constitutes a crime, legal liability will be prosecuted according to the law.

Article 27: National intelligence work personnel exceeding their powers, abusing their power, engaging in irregular favouritism, or divulging State secrets, commercial secrets or personal privacy will be punished according to the law; where it constitutes a crime, legal liability will be prosecuted according to the law.

Chapter V: Supplementary provisions

Article 28: This Law takes effect on the date of promulgation.

That was the draft version. For the final version click 2017_PRC_NationalIntelligenceLaw

Zoom is a perfect example of what McMasters talked about.. After reading China’s  laws there shouldn’t be any questions.  Zoom needs to be  removed for government use.  Every  American business connected to China needs to be investigated.

China is not hiding their intentions.  Americans are being  lied to and sold out. Yet, nobody seems to care.

McMasters  knowledge and experience in these matters is unique. If an enemy had access to what he knows. government infiltrations would be almost impossible to stop..

Look at Zoom.  Even with a FBI investigation and a history of security issues. They still  get approved for government use.  It’s  almost like they have a friend on the inside helping them.

What’s  H.R. McMasters up to today? The last time I checked he was doing pretty well. This year he received $450,000 in stock with another $30,000 with an additional $10,000 for being on the audit team. That was just for one job.

That’s  right,  McMasters  sold out. He is currently on the Board of Directors for Zoom.

For full press release click Zoom Adds Board Member H.R. McMaster and Head of Global Public Policy and Government Relations Jonathan Kallmer to Leadership 

Additional  information

https://zoom.us/partners

https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterhigh/2017/03/06/zoom-ceos-promise-to-his-wife-helped-inspire-a-1-billion-valued-company/amp/

https://zoom.us/team

 

China has your data.  Will you allow this to continue? The silent majority must stand up. It’s  time for a great awakening

 

Respectfully,

Deplorable Patriot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0