Category Archives: Uncategorized

One way to pray for the president

We should pray that the wicked be removed from the inner circle of the president.

Remove the dross from silver,
and out comes material for the silversmith;
remove the wicked from the king’s presence,
and his throne will be established through righteousness.
Proverbs 25:4-5

Every day we see another member of the president’s inner circle come out with false accusations against his policies. Then it becomes plain that their their connections trace back to names like Clinton, Soros and Obama.

Are our prayers already being answered?

~ TD

 

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Take this fun personality inkblot test!

BabaMail has a fun, quick Inkblot Test to plumb your personality.

The test says:

We all know inkblots can be superseded by our imagination, like clouds, and seen as any number of shapes. However, these inkblots are a bit different. For starters, they’re colorful. For another, this isn’t a clinical psych test, but more of a personality test. Tell us what you see, and we’ll tell you what we’ve learned about you!

To take the test, click here.

After you’ve taken the test, please share with us your result.

Mine was “100% Logic”:

You are a highly rational thinker! You use logic and common sense to make decisions and react to different situations. There are obviously times when you use emotions to dictate your behavior, but hey, you’re only human! You should feel proud that you are intellectual, mature and able to guide your life using reason and rationale!

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Halloween Treat from Ben Garrison

The full moon rises at the stroke of midnight as a mournful scream echos over the Deep State Swamp.

IT’S THE DEMONRATS’
HAUNTED HOUSE OF HORROR!

Beware! All who enter will be cursed with the agony of socialism…

https://grrrgraphics.com/happy-halloween-2019

In order to see the details easier, here are some slices;

Bill Clinton

Obama

Marx Media

Kitchen Dysphoria

Hillary

Epstein

Half-baked Monster DNC

Soros

Pelosi

Crazy-O

Thank you, Ben Garrison.

~ TD

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Twitter to ban all political advertising

Jack Dorsey, CEO of  Twitter and self-appointed censor of free political speech, announced on the eve of Satan’s holiday that ALL political advertising  on Twitter is now banned.

In addition, the ban extends t0 election advertising and political issues. Think anti-abortion, pro second amendment, and global climate change skeptics. In addition, it does not take an Einstein to figure out that this policy is aimed directly at President Trump, who uses Twitter to inform citizens of important issues that Twitter and the rest of the left wing, libtard, socialist/communist media cabal ignore.

From: The Guardian-US Edition

by Julia Carrie Wong in San Francisco

Wed 30 Oct 2019 18.19 EDT

First published on Wed 30 Oct 2019 16.05 EDT

 

Twitter will ban all political advertising, the company’s CEO has announced, in a move that will increase pressure on Facebook over its controversial stance to allow politicians to advertise false statements.

The new policy, announced via Jack Dorsey’s Twitter account on Wednesday, will come into effect on 22 November and will apply globally to all electioneering ads, as well as ads related to political issues. The timing means the ban will be in place in time for the UK snap election.

jack 🌍🌏🌎

@jack

We’ve made the decision to stop all political advertising on Twitter globally. We believe political message reach should be earned, not bought. Why? A few reasons…🧵

384K

4:05 PM – Oct 30, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

111K people are talking about this

Twitter had previously implemented rules and restrictions for political advertising.

The announcement comes as Facebook is embroiled in a controversy over its decision to exempt ads by politicians from third-party fact checking and from a policy that bans false statements from paid advertisements. Dorsey explained the motivations behind the change in a lengthy Twitter thread that appeared to include several references and responses to the convoluted arguments that Facebook has put forward in recent weeks.

The organic spread of political messages online “should not be compromised by money”, he wrote. The advanced state of digital advertising technology, including “machine learning-based optimization of messaging and micro-targeting” and deepfakes – fake or manipulated videos that appear real – combined with the pollution of the online information ecosystem with misinformation, “present entirely new challenges to civic discourse”.

“This isn’t about free expression,” he added, in a seeming riposte to the Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s recent defense of online political advertising in a speech billed as a “stand for voice and free expression”. “This is about paying for reach. And paying to increase the reach of political speech has significant ramifications that today’s democratic infrastructure may not be prepared to handle. It’s worth stepping back in order to address.”

Dorsey tweeted another counter-argument to Facebook with an accompanying winking emoji, writing: “It’s not credible for us to say: ‘We’re working hard to stop people from gaming our systems to spread misleading info, but if someone pays us to target and force people to see their political ad…well…they can say whatever they want!’”

jack 🌍🌏🌎

@jack

Replying to @jack

For instance, it‘s not credible for us to say: “We’re working hard to stop people from gaming our systems to spread misleading info, buuut if someone pays us to target and force people to see their political ad…well…they can say whatever they want! 😉”

 48.6K

4:05 PM – Oct 30, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

7,398 people are talking about this

That argument appears to mock Facebook’s recent attempts to justify its decisions to exempt posts by politicians from its third-party factchecking program, and ads by politicians from a policy that bans false statements from paid advertisements.

Together, the policies have created a situation in which Facebook is simultaneously asserting its commitment to reducing misinformation while allowing incumbent politicians and political candidates to lie in paid campaign ads.

Dorsey called for “forward-looking political ad regulation”, noting that transparency requirements that have been proposed by US lawmakers are “progress but not enough.”

“The internet provides entirely new capabilities, and regulators need to think past the present day to ensure a level playing field,” he said.

Trump’s campaign manager, Brad Parscale, called Twitter’s decision “another attempt by the left to silence Trump and conservatives” while Hillary Clinton called it “the right thing to do for democracy in America and all over the world” and the New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez deemed it “a good call”.

Daniel Kreiss, an associate professor of journalism and media at the University of North Carolina, argued that companies should focus on restricting the use of personal data in ad targeting rather than banning all political ads, which he said “favors incumbents and media appointed elites vis-a-vis challengers”.

J Nathan Matias, an assistant professor of communication at Cornell University, said that the ban could have a number of unintended consequences, including pushing campaigns to use more bots and “hybrid human-software coordination on Twitter”.

“It’s very hard to define ‘political’ things from non-political discourse,” he added. “If their policies are too loose or their enforcement too clumsy, Twitter could do real damage to public health, the uptake of government services and civic life.”

~ Grif

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Friday Funnies – Getting Old

The hassle of getting old. Not that I actually have  experience in any of these situations. Enjoy.

~ Grif

   

 

 

 

`

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Multimillionaire white male Prince Harry whines he can’t get out of bed in morning because of state of world

Prince Harry, 35, aka the Duke of Sussex, is the Left’s “privileged white male” on steroids.

He is also an eco-hypocrite, lecturing to us about climate change while flying in private jets.

Born to the British royalty, Harry is sixth in line to succeed as monarch of the United Kingdom.

Harry has a net worth estimated to be $25 million to $40 million, comprised of:

  • Half of a nearly £13 million ($16.7 million) trust fund left by his mother Princess Diana, who died in 1997. The sum was reduced to about £8 million ($10.3 million) after “death taxes,” according to Mirror. Harry received the full £4 million ($5.15 million) when he was 30.
  • The ” bulk of” a £14 million ($17.9 million) trust fund from his late great-grandmother, the Queen Mother who died in 2002. In 1994, she put two-thirds of her money into a trust fund for her great-grandchildren, Princes William and Harry. However, the BBC reported that the “bulk of the cash” went to Harry because his brother Prince William, being second in line for the throne after  Prince Charles, “will benefit financially by becoming king.”
  • Princess Diana’s considerable collection of jewelry, which Harry had split with Prince William.

In addition to his multimillion net worth, Harry also receives income from a royal allowance.

According to Jessie Quinn of Showbiz CheatSheet, “a large portion of” Harry’s income comes from an allowance from his dad Prince Charles’ Duchy of Cornwall — a family business consisting of rental properties, real estate, land, and other money-making entities. Prince Charles uses the income from the Duchy to pay his two sons, William and Harry, and their family members for their royal duties. The money typically covers travel expenses for royal tours, engagements, and ceremonies.

Despite his immense wealth and immensely privileged life, on September 24, 2019, the second day of his visit to Africa with wife Meghan and baby son Archie — for which he will be paid an unknown “allowance” by his dad’s Duchy of Cornwall — Harry visited the Auwal Mosque in South Africa’s Bo-Kaap district, where he spoke to students from the local community.

The UK Mirror reports that according to one of the students, Peter Oki, 18, Harry said “he often woke up and felt overwhelmed by too many problems in the world. That sometimes it’s hard to get out of bed in the mornings because of all the issues.”

In a commentary in The Sun, Rod Liddle speaks for all of us “little people”:

PRINCE HARRY has been explaining how he finds it difficult to get out of bed on a morning due to his worries about the state of the world.

I really don’t know what’s wrong with this bloke.

Listen, Harry. Many, many people find it hard to get out of bed in the morning because they don’t know where the next meal is going to come from.

Or because they’re about to slave all day for a pittance at a back-breaking job which they hate.

Can I suggest it’s a bit easier to get out of bed in the morning when your flunkey’s just brought you a nice boiled egg while another flunkey is getting your private plane ready for take-off?

You are an immensely rich, immensely privileged, white male.

And this constant emoting and whining is beginning to get a lot of people down.

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Sunday Devotional: No servant can serve two masters

Luke 16:10-15

Jesus said to his disciples:
“The person who is trustworthy in very small matters
is also trustworthy in great ones;
and the person who is dishonest in very small matters
is also dishonest in great ones.
If, therefore, you are not trustworthy with dishonest wealth,
who will trust you with true wealth?
If you are not trustworthy with what belongs to another,
who will give you what is yours?
No servant can serve two masters.
He will either hate one and love the other,
or be devoted to one and despise the other.
You cannot serve both God and mammon.”
The Pharisees, who loved money,
heard all these things and sneered at him.
And he said to them,
“You justify yourselves in the sight of others,
but God knows your hearts;
for what is of human esteem is an abomination in the sight of God.”

Mammon from Collin de Plancy’s Dictionnaire Infernal (1818), a book on demonology

Mammon in Hebrew (ממון) means “money”. In the New Testament, however, mammon does not mean just money, but is associated with the greedy pursuit of profit and gain. For Christians, mammon is a pejorative, a term used to describe gluttony, excessive materialism, greed, and unjust worldly gain.

In the Middle Ages, mammon was often personified as a deity and sometimes included in the seven princes of Hell; St. Gregory of Nyssa (c. 335 – c. 395) asserted that Mammon was another name for Beelzebub. During the generation of 1880-1925, American populists used “Mammon” with specific reference to the consolidated wealth and power of the banking and corporate institutions headquartered on Wall Street and their predacious activities nationwide. In contemporary pop culture today, various characters and demons are named Mammon in books, film, TV, anime, and video games.

While Jesus our Lord instructs us in Luke 16:13 that “You cannot serve God and mammon,” His injunction goes beyond mammon, the greedy and unjust pursuit of money, to include any and all ungodly obsessive pursuits and preoccupations because “No servant can serve two masters.”

And so, Luke 16:13 can be generalized to mean “You cannot serve God and your self,” for any one and any thing that we price more than God is a violation of the First Commandment (“I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt have no other gods before me”) and of the Greatest Commandment of all — to love God with our whole heart, our whole soul, our whole mind, and with all our strength.

Always remember this is what He did for us:

May the peace and love of Jesus Christ our Lord be with you,

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Dishonest Democrats doing it their way

Almost half of all homeless people in the United States are in California with 19% living in Los Angeles. This is just one of many problems residents of California face since the criminal organization democrat party got control of the state. The top three things you can always count on the democrats are being dishonest, corruption and destroying everything they touch.   The first two is how they got control of California.  It appears they are making a huge effort to accomplish the third in California.  At times there seems to be no logic, no intelligence behind some of the decisions they make.  It does not appear that they are concerned the Residents of California.

They didn’t get full control overnight.  It took a few years but they were successful.   Dishonest, but successful.  They got there by winning elections.  When it comes to elections, “Democrat” is synonymous to “election fraud”.  I have yet to see an honest democrat.

In California, the Secretary of State responsible for securing the elections.  “An election is only as fair and honest as the people that oversee it.”

Lets go back to 2007.  Voting systems compromised by democrats

Debra Lynn Bowen , a member of the Democratic Party, was the Secretary of State of California from 2007 to 2015.  In  2007  Bowen commissioned a “Top to Bottom Review” of California’s electronic voting systems, to determine their security.  In August  2007, Bowen withdrew approval and certification and conditionally re-approved three electronic voting systems (Diebold Election Systems, Hart InterCivic, Sequoia Voting Systems), and rescinded approval of a fourth system, (Election Systems & Software), after the top-to-bottom review of the voting machines found the machines to be highly insecure.  So basically after finding the systems faulty, no real changes were made.  For these efforts she was awarded the Profile in Courage Award by the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum.  Which is about as laughable as Obama’s Nobel prize.

*The following election in 2008 is where we see an increase of democrat voters and a decline of republican voters.  This trend repeating  itself each year until present date.

Below are screen shots of the voting systems used in California before the review and after the review.  I’ve also provided links to view the voting systems from 2006 to 2018. Clicking on the year will link you to the original PDF.  I should point out that between 2008 and 2018 some of the counties  switched brands of equipment.  Some of the new brands of equipment are the the same company as the original ones, Same product with a new name .  All of these, new and old have a history of errors.  None of them are 100% secure. For more details about security of each brand and general information click here  and scroll to the lower part of page.   Far too much for me to cover today but is worth taking the time to take a look.

Voting system before review

2006

vote1.jpg

Voting system after review

2008

vote2.jpg

 

 2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

In 2015 California got a new Secretary of State. Alex Padilla, a democrat.   After the 2018 elections, Padilla made a decision to replace all voting machines in California. “Padilla has long been concerned about the vulnerability of the nation’s voting machines. “We have done more to respond to hanging chads,” he told NBC News, “than we have done to respond to Vladimir Putin and the threats by Russian intelligence officials against our elections.”    Many of the current systems have only been used once, some twice.  Why didn’t he  replace them before the 2018 elections?    A feature with some of the current systems is that they record voting data that can be reviewed for a recount or audit.  Maybe that’s why he is in such a rush to change machines.

There are more changes in California.  Tens of thousands of neighborhood polling places, are being replaced by absentee ballots and secure drop boxes.  This only creates more opportunities for voter fraud.

Since “voter fraud” came up, we have to take a minute to talk about the democrats and the 2018 elections in California.  At the end of election day all republican candidates were leading in votes.  After the mail in votes were counted and the votes the democrats turned in (ballot harvesting), every republican ended up losing.  Many people blame this on the fact that democrat lawmakers in California made changes with ballot harvesting, creating more opportunities for voter fraud.  That is entirely possible but I think there was a bigger problem.

In California, county clerks are required to examine, one percent of their electorate’s original paper ballots once they have been electronically tabulated to ensure that the machines’ results have not been compromised and are accurate. The inspection is only applied to ballots that have been turned in before or on election day.  Anything after election day do not get inspected.   This means that millions of  Vote-By-Mail (VBM) and provisional ballots are exempted from further examination.  In California about 1/3 of the votes were mail in.  This is how I believe the democrats stole the election in 2018.

Another problem is California’s automatic voter registration at the DMV.  Beside their new Kiosk being totally insecure and are waiting to be hacked.   Some past problems with the automatic voter registration are , mistaken records showing up at local election offices, upward of 100,000 inaccurate documents. Party preferences were wrong. Some non-citizens were mistakenly added to the voter rolls. Other DMV customers didn’t know they’d been registered. These errors were blamed on hackers.  These events happened 6 days before the program was launched.  Since then, at least 255k voter registration errors have been found.  Padilla none of the errors effected the election results in 2018.  He also blames the DMV  for the problems, but the only person responsible is Padilla himself .Bill AB 1461 Motor voter program.   What is also interesting is that  since the automatic voter registration launched,  there has been  an increase of registered democrats and a increase in “no party preference” with a decline of registered republicans.

stats

 

Currently it looks as democrats are making a huge effort to make elections less secure.  I also don’t believe the number of republicans are declining in California.  I think it’s just another part of the democrats con game for reasons I will discuss at a future date.  There is a bigger problem in California.  A problem that all residents of California should be concerned about.

Taking on the problems that exist at Californias’ DMV , Gavin Newsom made the decision to bring in a third party to solve the problem.  This was part of his “strike team?  The third party is “Code for America “  Code for America  describes themselves as follows, “We are a network of people making government work for the people, by the people, in the digital age. How do we get there? With government services that are simple, effective, and easy to use, working at scale to help all Americans, starting with the people who need them most.”.  They also like to refer themselves as “civic hackers”.  Their 60 member team is made up of 43 women and 17 men. They have 7 members on their Board of Directors.  One being the Founder and Executive Director who also heads the 60 member team.  At least 2 of the members were part of the Obama administration. They have 85 locations across the USA. Click here for a complete list of who funds them.  Here is a screen shot of the top donors.  code

Here is where you should be concerned.  Gavin Newsom gave full DMV access to Code for America.  That means that this group of “civic hackers” had full access all data, including voter information, of every resident in California.  Take a minute and think about what information the DMV  has on you.   Now what are the odds that 6  companies like Google that invested over $1,000,000 in Code for America now has that information.  Microsoft invested $999,000. You think they have your information.  Pretty good odds that your information is in their hands.  As if they didn’t have enough already. Go click the link I provided that shows who funds Code for America.  Actually here is the link again. Click here.

The data breach is only part of the problem.  Newsom brought in a non government source to make decisions  on how part of our state government should be operated.  That source being Code for America which all final decisions are made by 1 person.  That person is Jennifer Pahlka,

Founder and Executive Director, Code for America

Jennifer Pahlka is the founder and executive director of Code for America. She served as the U.S. Deputy Chief Technology Officer in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy from 2013–2014

Code for America getting full access to the DMV is pure speculation on my part.  Considering the circumstances I could not see how they could complete their task without access.  What I do know is that I don’t like third parties with their own agenda making  decisions on how to any part of the state should function.

Newsom is no stranger to Code for America as you can see here.

This is just another example of how the democrats are selling out the residents of California.  No matter where you stand in politics this is an issue everyone should be concerned about.

Now as far as the declining republicans in California.  Were told that they are moving out of state to the adjacent states.  If that were true there would be increase of registered republican voters in those states, which there is not.  I think some republican ballots are being manipulated.  Here is one example.  When Trump ran I registered to vote by mail  They wanted proof of who I was.  I never sent proof but they still sent me ballot I checked to see if I was registered and it said yes., Mailed my Ballot and it came back.  Not sure what happened.  Then I checked to see if I was registered and it said no.  The day after the election I had got another ballot in the mail.  Now in 2018, I still had not provided proof that I was me.  I checked if I was registered and it said yes.  I got my ballot in the mail.  Lost it somewhere and  requested a new one.  Checked again and it said I was not registered.  Today it says I am registered.

By now you should be just as confused as I am as far as my ballot situation goes.  I had an easier time signing up to run for president in 2020.

 

QAnon community-8chan will be up and running soon.

Respectfully

Deplorable Patriot.

 

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

50 years of doomsday climate-change predictions that didn’t come true

Yesterday, Sept. 20, 2019, was Friday, a school day. But countless young people in the U.S. and across the world skipped school to protest in a global “climate strike”.

In the “woke” San Francisco Bay Area, school children skipped school to protest about climate change, putting pressure on politicians and corporations they say are contributing to an environmental crisis.

As reported by Berkeleyside, one of the protesters, Berkeley High junior Adrienne Mermin, 16, described climate change as apocalyptic. She warned: “There’s a deadline on our existence and a deadline on when we can reverse this. When climate change and climate justice was connected to environmental racism, it became more than just ‘the ice caps are melting,’ and more ‘this affects all of us, and every single one of us can help stop this.’”

Mermin was echoing the doomsday warnings of adults like Al Gore, who predicted the North Pole would be ice-free by 2016; Prince Charles, who said in 2009 that because of capitalism and consumerism, we had just 96 months or 8 years, i.e., until 2017, to save the world; and more recently Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who proclaimed Miami would disappear in “a few years” due to climate change.

Writing for the Competitive Enterprise Institute on Sept. 18, 2019, Myron Ebell and Steven J. Milloy remind us that Gore, Chucky and AOC are just the latest instances of doomsayers who have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. Like Gore, et al., the makers of these apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in government and science. The problem is this: “None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true,” and the media won’t report on the failed predictions.

What follows is a collection of apocalyptic climate predictions from notable people in government and science:

  1. In 1967, Stanford University “population biologist” Paul Ehrlich said that because of unrestrained population growth, “the time of famines” was already upon us and would be at its worst and most disastrous by 1975. (Salt Lake Tribune, Nov. 17, 1967, p. 9)
  2. Two years later in 1969, Ehrlich warned that “by the time we have enough evidence to convince people” about the world’s runaway population growth, a limited food supply, and man’s contamination of the environment, “you’re dead” because “everybody will disappear in a cloud of blue stream in 20 years” — i.e., by 1989. (New York Times, August 10, 1969)
  3. A year later in 1970, Ehrlich once again sounded a doomsday warning that “the oceans would be as dead as Lake Erie in less than a decade,” and that America would have water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980. (Redlands Daily Facts, October 6, 1970)
  4.  In 1970, James P. Lodge Jr., a scientist at the national center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, predicted that air pollution would obliterate the sun and cause a new ice age in the first third of the 21st century, and that if the current rate of increase in electric power generation continued, the demands for cooling water would “boil dry the entire flow of the rivers and streams of continental United States.” (Boston Globe, April 16, 1970)
  5. In 1971, Dr. S. I. Rasool of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Columbia University, predicted that “in the next 50 years, i.e., by 2021, the fine dust we put into the atmosphere by fossil-fuel burning could screen out so much sunlight that the average temperature could drop by six degrees. (Washington Post, July 9, 1971)
  6. In 1972, R. K. Matthews, chairman of Brown University’s Department of Geological Sciences, wrote in a letter to President Richard Nixon that “a global deterioration of climate, by order of magnitude larger than any hitherto experienced by civilized mankind, is a very real possibility and indeed may be due very soon.” (NOAA, October 2015)
  7. In 1974, “preliminary analysis” of space satellites conducted by European climatologists George and Helena Kukla showed that the world had plunged into a new ice age, with snow and ice cover of the earth having increased by as much as 12% in just five years, from 1967 to 1972. (The Guardian, January 29, 1974)
  8. In 1974, “a growing number of scientists” found that the earth’s atmosphere had been gradually cooling for the last three decades. “Since the 1940s the mean global temperature has dropped about 2.7° F.” and “The telltale signs are everywhere — from the unexpected persistence and thickness of pack ice in the waters around Iceland to the southward migration of a warmth-loving creature like the armadillo from the Midwest”. (TIME, June 24, 1974)

Go to Competitive Enterprise Institute for 18 more apocalyptic climate-change predictions that didn’t come true, one of which is this doozy:

In February 2004, a secret Pentagon report that was “suppressed by U.S. defence chief” but “obtained” by the UK’s The Observer, warned that because of climate change, Britain would be “plunged into a ‘Siberian’ climate by 2020,” as “nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting” would erupt across the world. (The Guardian, February 21, 2004)

H/t California Political Review

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

We have a winner!

The writers of FOTM voted for what each considered to be the best (#1) and second-best (#2) captions. Each #1 vote is worth 4 points; a #2 vote is worth 2 points.

And the winner of the 207th FOTM Caption Contest, with three #1 votes and one #2 vote, totaling 14 points, is . . .

Lou Minati!

Here is the winning caption:

Who wants to play “Find the stogie”?

Jackie Puppet is in second place, with two #1 votes and 8 points. Here’s his caption:

Devil in a blue dress

Gunny T and Watertender are in 3rd place, each with 4 points. Here are their captions:

Gunny T (with one #1 vote): “Does this dress make my butt look fat?”

Watertender (with two #2 votes): “I look so much better in a dress than J. Edgar Hoover ever could!”

Christy, Dan and wrw are in 4th place, each with one #2 vote and 2 points. Here are their captions:

Christy: “Barbara Bush and Satan had a ‘son’.”

Dan: “You were going to say something, wise guy? Go tell it to Vince Foster.”

wrw: “Hey Monica, wanna stain this dress too?”

WELL DONE, EVERYONE!

Congratulations, Lou Minati!

Here is your super-duper Award of Excellence, all ready for framing!

For all the other caption submissions, go here.

Be here tomorrow for our next, very exciting Caption Contest!

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
error0