Some would find it hard to believe that one person could be behind the caravans arriving at our southern border. I would have to agree with them. There is one man that is very much involved. Some things never seem to change. Let us use the last “caravan” experience for an example. We know that at least 3 outside groups helping to organize the caravan all had been funded by the same person. That person would be George Soros. It is becoming quite clear that Soros is involved with this Caravan we currently face.
First, we have Emma Lozano, a member of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC); this organization is funded by George Soros. El Centro Sin Fronteras received donations from The National Immigration Forum. This organization is funded by George Soros.
Next we have, Viridiana Vidal. ” Vidal is now the Nevada state director of the left-wing advocacy group “America’s voice”. “America’s Voice”, another organization funded by George Soros.
This information was found on a list of organizations that had received direct funding and assistance from George Soros and his Open Society Institute (OSI). The list comes from www.discoverthenetworks.org. The list was made in 2011. Safe to assume the list is currently much larger. Here is the 2011 list.
*Link for www.discoverthenetworks.org no longer working. I believe website is shut down.
Here is a link to another 636 groups or individuals Soros has funded. Keep in mind that Soros is global. These are only groups that have an impact on the USA. There are many more organizations Soros is involved with. This link should give you a better perspective on how much influence Soros has in the USA. Click here to view list of USA politicians and/or organizations Soros has funded.
There is more. Soros is a man with a plan. Now the caravan wants a bus ride. Hardly surprising I was starting to wonder what the “hold up was”.
The Honduran caravan set forth around October 12, 2018. I had learned there was going to be a large group of people that were going to try to enter the United States which included the use of buses on October 10, 2018. The following was posted in a sub on Reddit that day.
“Attention: Remember to register your Bus ID# for the Midterms BEFORE 10/20/31. Additionally, volunteers are needed for December’s false flag as well as the holiday party!!
PAID SHILL ANNOUNCEMENT
Dear Dedicated Globalist,
Sorry for the sudden Reddit announcement, but as you may know Q’s INFOSEC team has shut down our secret Facebook Group and Tumblr page. Anyhoo, Midterms are right around the corner and Soros Corp and I would like to thank you all for participating in this year’s upcoming cross-border busing initiative! Two years of digging for social security numbers, creating fake addresses and recruiting our Mexican friends across the border have all come down to this!! However, it has come to our attention that many of you have NOT registered your Bus ID number. Available ID#s will soon come in the form of an info drop on 4chan so spread the word and keep hitting that refresh button!”
The second part of that post sounds like the person is “unhinged” or crazy. This is done on purpose to make the post look like it’s a joke. This is a common tactic that is used by members of this sub. Here is a quote of that.
“Some information to keep in mind:
Remember to stop by Headquarters to pick up a crate of vaccines, voters are not to be paid until they have been vaccinated. NON NEGOTIABLE
Women are to each receive a list of designated male Republican candidates and public figures. Included will be a pamphlet instructing them on creating back stories and circumstantial evidence in the case that sexual assault allegations need to be made in the future
Children accompanying their parents will need to be separated and transported to DNC Headquarters where they will be assigned to their new master, parents are not to be compensated until the merchandise is received and processed at HQ.”
Then it ends with., “I’m sure you have many questions, so please leave them below and a Soros Corp. representative will promptly respond.”
For those of you whom are not aware, Reddit is rated the 3rd most visited website in the world. This post comes from the sub-reddit Top Minds of Reddit. This is a sub that makes a huge effort at attacking other subs that they do not agree with politically. There are times, such as this post, where they use it to make announcements to individuals involved with their movement. Some of the moderators of this sub are said to be administrators/employees of Reddit. Some of the moderators are also moderators for the sub r/SPLC (southern Poverty Law Center). SPLC is no fan of POTUS or people that are politically aligned with the “right”.
Top Minds of Reddit(TMOR) members and posters consistently talk about George Soros. They often brag about receiving payments from him by doing various jobs, both on and off the internet. They make post of links where and how to get paid by Soros.
*THE NEXT FOUR LINES ARE FOR REFERENCE TO SUPPORT THE ARTICLE. AND FOR NEW READERS. I’VE POSTED THESE LINKS IN THE PAST.
If a person were to look in the comments section in the post described HERE they would find some disturbing comments. Some can be offensive. I’ve included a couple screenshots only to expose them and to support the article in general. I do not approve of their behavior.
Reddit’s involvement with George Soros is not anything new. This has already been exposed here at Fellowship of the Minds. Reddit also has a history of censoring anyone that does not share their political views. All the QAnon subs and most subs that are right wing have been banned. There is a definite problem here. Top Minds Of Reddit is being weaponized in more ways than one. Top Minds of Reddit are allowed to violate rules. The same rules that others get banned for This is one of the places where Soros promotes his word. The screenshots I provided are by far more offensive than anything I have seen in any sub that has been recently banned. There are a minimum of three rule violations here. The context in these screenshots is enough to have a police officer knock on door. Besides references to pedophilia we see they are talking about using buses and the use of syringes to vaccinate children. We now we have a possible cause for some of the health problems. The caravan has a chickenpox problem and has made request for buses. It’s very likely there’s a connection.
Another problem that I have noticed is TMOR uses this image
Are they part of Electronic Frontier Foundation or are they just pretending?
The graphic is free to download but to use it in a way that misleads people into thinking TMOR is part of the EFF is a whole different story. I am currently waiting for a response from EFF. It will be interesting to learn what the EFF has to say.. The EFF on its own is a story to be told.
Let us not forget about George Soros. George Soros has vowed to bring the USA down.
In 2016 Soros made $22,109,933 in contributions to the Democrats and Liberals.
Soros has planned to spend $119.8 million in the USA in the year 2018. For Click Here for
Soros profile. The problem with Soros is he seems to be on the opposite side of America. Soros wants open borders in the USA.
When people want come to the United States they should be welcomed. They are, when they follow procedure. When they enter illegally it is a problem. When they try to overwhelm the border with large numbers, it is a problem. The minute they hit an American civilian, military, law enforcement, border patrol, with a rock, stick, fist, or any object while in the act of trying to sneak into the USA it becomes a crime. In some cases an act of war on the USA. Any person that is helping organize that lives in the USA should also face the same charges as the person committing the crime plus additional charges on their own. Treason, Sedition comes to mind. There are many to choose from that fit the crime. Any outsider like George Soros should also face charges. Please take the time to research. The truth is not always pretty. But it is the truth.
I’ve been asked many questions relating to QAnon and the QAnon movement. Who is QAnon? Who are the people behind Q? What’s all about? My answer is usually along the lines of “research for yourself so that you can decide for yourself”. Then I point them in the best direction I can to help.
A person can expect many different opinions when it comes to defining QAnon and the QAnon movement. Naturally it depends on who you ask. Like many places I go to when researching, I usually check Wikipedia. Unfortunately this is a topic that I think they did not handle properly. Wikipedia does an obvious “hack job” on their QAnon page. Instead of taking a neutral point of view, the editors went with writing obvious bias against QAnon and the QAnon movement using “left wing sources”. Many of which are personal opinions, not factual. Here are some of the more palatable entries they have on QAnon.
“QAnon (/kjuːəˈnɒn/) is a right-wing conspiracy metatheory which began with an October 2017 post on the anonymous image board 4chan by someone using the handle Q, a presumably American individual that may have later grown to include multiple individuals claiming to have access to classified information involving the Trump administration and its opponents in the United States. The theory details a supposed secret conspiracy by an alleged “deep state” against U.S. President Donald Trump and his supporters”.
“There has been much speculation regarding the motive and the identity of the poster, with theories ranging from the poster being a military intelligence officer, to Donald Trump himself, to the posting campaign being an alternate reality game by Cicada 3301. Because 4chan is anonymous and does not allow registration by users, any number of individuals may post using the same handle. The poster uses a frequently changing tripcode to authentify himself on8chan”.
“A person identifying as “Q Clearance Patriot” first appeared on the /pol/ board of 4chan on October 28, 2017, posting messages in a thread entitled “Calm Before the Storm”, which was a reference to Trump’s cryptic description during a gathering of himself and United States military leaders as “the calm before the storm”. Q later moved to 8chan, citing concerns that the 4chan board had been compromised by “bad actors”.
“The poster’s handle implied that the anonymous poster holds Q clearance, a United States Department of Energy security clearance required for access to Top Secret information about nuclear weapons and materials”.
With that being said I usually skip Wikipedia and give them one or more of the following places to research. v/the Awakening, one of the two subs that I had moderated. I resigned as a mod because I felt that I was not getting enough accomplished. Turned out to be a good move. I have been able to get more involved which helped me discover several infiltrators and their removal. Threats in the movement. v/QRV . On 8 chan Patriots awoken, Patriots fight
Other options would be currently under control of Q research control and are endorsed by QAnon are the following,
Q Clearance Archive
There is a lot of information to be found on many topics at these locations. For the average person I think the best place would be the QCA Discord . Clicking on QCA Discord will provide you a link, an Invitation to QCA Discord . Most answers to questions that are Q related can be found here. You won’t get QAnons identity but you will learn what it’s all about.
Now the answer to what QAnon is all about. The following Is the answer I was provided. It can be found at QCA Discord. Ideological WarfareMEMETICS, The Q movement’s main purpose is as a MEME ARMY.
Far too much to cover and be accurate, so I have provided the PDF I had received. It explains all about MEMETICS. This is the absolute reason why QAnon and the movement was created. Everything else that comes with it is a plus. Many have had this discussion in the past. I do not believe any solid proof has been provided linking QAnon and the information in the PDF. Even if you do not care for QAnon. The PDF is worthy of a click. Link is provided at bottom of page or click Here
I should point out that I’m not trying to make QAnon look less legit. I’m only providing information that answers some questions. I stand with the QAnon movement. All the information is public knowledge. Who is QAnon? What’s it all about? Research. Read the PDF. You tell me.
Q13 Fox reports that just after 8 p.m. last night, Oct. 18, someone threw Molotov cocktails at the Iglesia ni Cristo Church at 7100 42nd Avenue South, Seattle, Washington.
About fifty people were worshiping inside the church. Fortunately, no one was injured.
Witnesses called 911 to report a fire outside the church. By the time the Seattle Fire Department arrived, the fire had already been extinguished.
Witnesses said a person had thrown lit bottles of an unknown liquid at the building. Seattle Fire spokesman Kristin Tinsley said the fire was started by several Molotov cocktail devices, which caused minor damage to the exterior of the church and some vehicles outside.
Below is a video from a surveillance camera across the street from the church, showing several Molotov cocktails exploding against the front of the church.
Seattle Police Arson/Bomb Squad detectives have taken over the investigation and are working with witnesses to develop a suspect description.
Q13 Fox reporter John Hopperstadt tweeted that church members said they had “confronted” a group of men outside the church a few days before the arson.
Iglesia Ni Cristo is an independent nontrinitarian Christian religious organization that originated in the Philippines. It claims to be the one true church and the restoration of the original church founded by Jesus, and that all other Christian churches are apostates.
According to the 2010 census, 2.45% of the population in the Philippines are affiliated with the Iglesia ni Cristo, making it that country’s third largest religion, after Islam at 5.57% and Roman Catholicism at 80.58%.
H/t Big Lug
Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!
Nearly a hundred years after the suffragettes won women the right to vote with the passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920, this is what feminism has degenerated into.
Note: In 1869, Wyoming was the first U.S. state to grant women voting rights.
Victoria Bissell Brown, 69 (she will be 70 in January), is a retired history professor at Grinnell College, a private liberal arts college in Grinnell, Iowa. She now lives in Havertown, PA, with her 71-year-old husband, James Wilton Brown.
Victoria Brown completely bought Christine Blasey Ford’s lying testimony at the Senate hearing on now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court, although Ford has no corroborating witnesses and cannot remember the date or place of the alleged sexual assault.
Below is Brown’s Oct. 12 op-edin the Washington Post, “Thanks for not raping us, all you ‘good men.’ But it’s not enough,” describing her spitting rage at her thoroughly browbeaten husband, whom she admits is a “good man”:
I yelled at my husband last night. Not pick-up-your-socks yell. Not how-could-you-ignore-that-red-light yell. This was real yelling. This was 30 minutes of from-the-gut yelling. Triggered by a small, thoughtless, dismissive, annoyed, patronizing comment. Really small. A micro-wave that triggered a hurricane. I blew. Hard and fast. And it terrified me. I’m still terrified by what I felt and what I said. I am almost 70 years old. I am a grandmother. Yet in that roiling moment, screaming at my husband as if he represented every clueless male on the planet (and I every angry woman of 2018), I announced that I hate all men and wish all men were dead. If one of my grandchildren yelled something that ridiculous, I’d have to stifle a laugh.
My husband of 50 years did not have to stifle a laugh. He took it dead seriously. He did not defend his remark, he did not defend men. He sat, hunched and hurt, and he listened.For a moment, it occurred to me to be grateful that I’m married to a man who will listen to a woman. The winds calmed ever so slightly in that moment. And then the storm surge welled up in me as I realized the pathetic impotence of nice men’s plan to rebuild the wreckage by listening to women. As my rage rushed through the streets of my mind, toppling every memory of every good thing my husband has ever done (and there are scores of memories), I said the meanest thing I’ve ever said to him: Don’t you dare sit there and sympathetically promise to change. Don’t say you will stop yourself before you blurt out some impatient, annoyed, controlling remark. No, I said, you can’t change. You are unable to change. You don’t have the skills and you won’t do it. You, I said, are one of the good men. You respect women, you believe in women, you like women, you don’t hit women or rape women or in any way abuse women. You have applauded and funded feminism for a half-century. You are one of the good men. And you cannot change. You can listen all you want, but that will not create one iota of change.
In the centuries of feminist movements that have washed up and away, good men have not once organized their own mass movement to change themselves and their sons or to attack the mean-spirited, teasing, punching thing that passes for male culture. Not once. Bastards. Don’t listen to me. Listen to each other. Talk to each other. Earn your power for once.
The gender war that has broken out in this country is flooding all our houses. It’s rising on the torrent of memories that every woman has. Those memories have come loose from the attic and the basement where we’ve stashed them. They are floating all around us and there is no place left to store them out of sight. Not just memories of sexual abuse. Memories of being dismissed, disdained, distrusted. Memories of having to endure put-downs at the office, catcalls in the parking lot, barked orders at a dinner party. And, for some reason, the most chilling memory of all, the one Christine Blasey Ford called up and that we all recognized: the laughter. The laughter of men who are bonding with each other by mocking us. When Ford testified under oath that the laughter is the sharpest memory of her high school assault, every woman within the sound of her voice could hear that laughter, had heard that laughter, somewhere, somehow.
No man right now understands the flood that is rushing through women’s brains, and only women in the deepest denial have evacuated their minds before the flood could reach them.
When good men like Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-Del.) give heartfelt, sincere speeches about how we must listen to women, I don’t know whether to coo or laugh or cry or yell. Think about “listen to women” as a program for change. It says to women: You will continue to suffer these abuses, men will continue to do disgusting things to you, the storms will keep coming, the tide will continue to rise, but now, we will listen and help you rebuild.
Pay attention people: If we do not raise boys to walk humbly and care deeply, if we do not demand that men do more than just listen, we will all drown in the flood. And there is no patriarchal Noah to save us.
Were he not already gelded and fitted with a pussy hat, Victoria Brown’s husband should have her arrested for spousal and elder abuse.
Note: This article is based on collaborative research by Anne Berg, Alison Maynard and the author. For many readers, it will be a rehash. Its value, we believe, lies in evidence that the mainstream media and other official sources effectively confused the public with misleading photography and contradiction concerning the timeline of events. It appears that we are supposed to overlook these blatant contradictions in timeline and testimony in order to accept the official narrative. ~C.
The Greek word “labyrinthos” is translated in the Online Etymology Dictionary as a “ ‘…large building with intricate passages,’ especially the structure built by Daedelus to hold the Minotaur, near Knossos in Crete.” The word’s ancestor, labrys, means a “double-edged axe,” which was associated with royal power.
We can think of no better metaphor for the Sandy Hook phenomenon, both in relation to the central mythos of the school itself – a shabby brick structure whose corridors and doors had supernatural logic- and physics-defying powers – as well as the Sandy Hook story, an elaborate maze by any reckoning. And, of course, we have the Minotaur, who is the Obamaniac deep state in the guise of Adam Lanza.
So down we went again through those haunted, gone-without-a-trace halls, this time to a door from which a class of second graders is said to have issued, escaping the Minotaur and becoming part of Sandy Hook’s photographic icon.
To enter this door, we first needed to visit the CT State Police report files for whatever information we could gather in between heavy redactions.
And, as luck would have it, we hit pay dirt; that is to say, a lot of the dirt had already been thoroughly turned over by a researcher writing pseudonymously as “Sandy Hooked” at sandyhooked.wordpress.com. To give credit where it’s due, “Sandy Hooked” has a golden shovel, turning up some choice nuggets in the unwieldy and labyrinthine CT State Police report files. Wherever “Sandy Hooked” has dug, Doubters have surely benefited.
However, a caveat: we believe that “Sandy Hooked” may not be operating on his/her own and may, in fact, be “working for the opposition,” trawling for reactions from the Sandy Hooked Doubter community. This is, admittedly, conjecture based on several observations; among other things, Sandy Hooked is working on a domain hosted by WordPress, which did a major takedown of Sandy Hook Doubter web sites this past August. Yet, “Sandy Hooked” lingers, one of the few non-casualties. (If we are wrong about our conjecture, we would welcome the evidence. We believe in giving credit where it’s due.)
In any case, we call readers’ attention to this prolific site with the above caveat and the additional observation that many of “Sandy Hooked’s” analyses are as labyrinthine and murky as the Sandy Hook story itself.
The double doors of Room #5. Sandy Hook Elementary’s Room #5 was situated in the moldy northeast corridor of the school. Unlike other classrooms that we explored in Parts 1 and 2, it had a main doorknob capable of being locked from the inside and outside, and on the fateful day that outside doorknob was locked, according to the state police.
Above: Interior plan of the old Sandy Hook Elementary school; red arrow on Room #5 is the author’s.
But even more unusual, Room #5 was connected to Room #3 by an inside door. (This is corroborated by the State’s Attorney Report — page 22 online; page 18 in print). That inside door was also locked. According to Sandy Hooked’s research, Room #5 was the only classroom with this fortuitous arrangement. As you will see, it made possible a purported rescue and “evacuation” from the school, as chronicled in two photographs beloved by Sandy Hook true believers and the mainstream media.
Room #5 couldn’t be cleared until police broke into it. But instead of breaking in through the locked main door, police chose to break through the locked inside door, from Room #3.
The breach of the inside door was noted by police in writing on the wall next to Room #3, instead of the wall nearest the breached door.
Room #5 was barricaded by police later, reportedly the only classroom to be treated this way.
Some of the police testimony makes no mention of breaching the inside door. Two examples cited by Sandy Hooked follow:
CFS 1200704559 Book 6 000199903 p.2 “I then ran back inside and met with TFC Cournoyer and TFC Cipriano. We then went to room #5. Upon entry to this room we found a room of children and their teacher huddled in the coat area of the room.”
CFS 1200704559 Book 6 00011235 p.2 “I assumed the right flank position and cleared the next two rooms (classroom #7 then classroom #5) teachers and children were escorted out of these rooms and sent toward the exit near the lobby.”
A Room #5 mother who eluded the Minotaur. Among Room #5’s mysteries is one concerning a mother who should have had a close brush with Adam Lanza, but mysteriously did not. (A hat tip to Sandy Hooked for clueing us in to this one, although s/he doesn’t link the incident to Room #5 as we are doing here.)
The story goes like this: On the morning of 12-14-12, around 9:30, a mother is said to have gone to the school to drop off a letter for one “Mrs. Taylor” that her child had written but left at home. (Mrs. Taylor was the Room #5 second-grade teacher, as we shall discuss later.)
The letter is said to have contained the child’s apology for “cheating.” (The mother’s statement is found here in the CT State Police report: CFS 1200704559 Book 5 00005519).
Although the mother’s name is redacted, the Visitor log confirms the allegation. See below:
(From “The Impossible Timeline,” sandyhooked.wordpress.com; red rectangle is by Sandy Hooked.)
The mother’s testimony also includes the following:
The mother left the Sandy Hook parking lot at 9:34 a.m. (The first active shooter report is said to have come in to Newtown and Connecticut emergency fire and law enforcement radio dispatch at 9:35:52. – Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, p. 255)
The mother saw no passing cars on her way in or out. Given the above, how is this possible? How did she not cross paths with Lanza the Minotaur?
The mother saw nothing odd or out of place.
The mother saw an older gentleman dressed in dark clothing inside the school, shuffling around with his hands in his pockets while walking toward the first grade classrooms. (These would be Rooms 8, 10, 12, or 50 and 52). Hooked thinks the man was the father who was there for a gingerbread-house-making event. This would be Chris Manfredonia. But Manfredonia was only 41 at the time, and not likely to be discerned as “elderly” or “shuffling.” Did Manfredonia sign in that day? Another unsolved mystery.
So, who was in Room #5, anyway? It isn’t a question that the otherwise inquisitive Sandy Hooked has posed, but we are posing and answering it here.
Room #5 was a second-grade classroom led by teacher Amy Brackett Taylor. According to this article from Bend Bulletin, the children in Room #5 were those who made up the famous “conga line” photographed by Shannon Hicks for the Newtown Bee. We suggest that you pause here to read the article. (And when you do, please notice the little girl referred to as “a peanut” dressed in a pink top. More about this in Part 4.)
Just to clarify: We can safely assume, based on the Bend article, that the conga line was supposed to have issued from the doors of Room #5.
You might wonder why such a dramatic rescue – which involved the breach of an interior door – was never reported in reference to the famous conga line. Why not? The mainstream media, typically poised like a jackal to seize such opportunities, must have slept through this one.
Now let’s turn our attention to the photographer of that moment in time when the conga line emerged before an audience of casually dressed, relaxed-looking parents.
Did Ms. Hicks hiccup? According to this Time.com article, Shannon Hicks, a Newtown Bee associate editor and photographer, photographed the evacuation described above at 10:09 a.m. on 12-14-12:
“At 10:09 am, 10 minutes after she [Hicks] climbed out of her vehicle, she snapped the shutter on an elementary school class being led out of the school by two Connecticut State Police officers.”
Here is the iconic photo that purportedly resulted of children being shepherded by police to the neighboring firehouse. (Children’s faces have been blacked out to protect their identity.)
The “Iconic” Photo. Photo Credit: Shannon Hicks, Newtown Bee/AP
The Time.com statement about the 10:09 shutter click is debatable, however, because of a slideshow that Hicks made from 20 of her photos and released on YouTube. Note that this slideshow is said to have been posted on December 14, 2012.
In Nobody Died at Sandy Hook (pages 124-125 online; pages 76-77 in print) Vivian Lee writes that the slideshow was discovered to have been uploaded at 5:44 p.m., Dec. 13, 2012, then made public on Dec. 14.
The evidence for Ms. Lee’s allegation is provided in this video by “QKUltra.” Cinderella et al. aren’t techies, but we present this as credible evidence.
Screen shot above is by QKUltra, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uCOd7r4cfA
(In case this vid vanishes, just search for Newtown Bee Stinger, YouTube. QKUltra is very good about mirroring his vids, and has been doing so for years.)
If the timing of the video is off, so is much else. Compare the iconic photo with a similar one from the slideshow (as before, children’s faces have been blacked out):
The Casual Parents. Photo Credit: Shannon Hicks, Newtown Bee/AP
The length of the shadows show that the photo couldn’t have been taken at 10:00 a.m., but must have been taken much earlier in the morning. On 12-14-12, the temperature was below freezing1 at the time this shadow pattern would have been plausible, in which case, we might expect to see vapor issuing from mouths and frost on the ground.
There has been online speculation that the little girl in the aqua blue shirt (in the “iconic” photo) is yawning, not screaming, consistent with an early morning shot.
The photos appear to have been staged in order to get the best shot – with parents looking on, their casual body language inconsistent with a recent act of terror. The photos feature different lineups of some of the same kids, but with others missing in one photo. For example, the little girl wearing a pale pink top and skirt in the photo above is not in the “iconic” photo.
All of the above oddities have been noted by other researchers. To these we can add one more:
If all of these second graders came out of Room #5, wouldn’t all of them be in both photos? It would seem unconscionable for the police to have left some of these helpless innocents behind (with their eyes closed as they passed through a hall containing dead bodies), while escorting another group out first.
More slideshow hits. Let’s take a look at another photo that Shannon Hicks placed on her slideshow.
Photo Credit: Shannon Hicks, Newtown Bee/AP
Note how these cars are parked very close the SHES building wall, two cars deep. If, indeed, they were parked there on 12-14-12 at 10:00 a.m., where was Adam Lanza’s car? It was supposed to have been parked up against the same wall behind police tape. Compare the above photo, purportedly taken after the massacre at around 10:00 a.m. with the ones below of Lanza’s car behind police tape on 12-14-12, before it was towed away.
Above Photo: Meehan, CT State Police Report, Parking Lot Photo #16
REUTERS/Connecticut State Police/Handout via Reuters
Here’s an aerial view of Lanza’s car:
Photo Credit: MSNBC
Below is yet another view of the same area in the parking lot, with a foursome running away from the school. (The child’s face has been blacked out to protect her identity.)
The Running Foursome.Photo Credit: Shannon Hicks, Newtown Bee/AP
You might ask why the policeman is running away, instead of rounding up more teachers and students. And why do the vehicles in back of the foursome appear out of proportion – rather too large? Once again, they’re parked very close to the building, two cars deep, leaving no apparent room for the Sandy Hook Minotaur’s black Honda.
Ask yourself if the above parking arrangements are anything like the one captured on 12-14-12 by CNN below:
We think it’s plain to see: The line-up of cars behind the four running people doesn’t match the aerial photo, either.
The simplest and most logical reason why the black Honda doesn’t appear in the previous photos is because it wasn’t there. We propose that the reason it wasn’t there is because the iconic and slideshow photos were taken on a previous date. This is consistent with the evidence in QKUltra’s video, which attests that the photos were uploaded on 12-13-12.
The photos were later used to substantiate an “evacuation” of second-graders from Mrs. Amy Taylor’s Room #5. In other words, we have reason to believe that the photos were staged. And if those photos were staged, we can safely assume that everything was.
Who’s who? It may be important to identify some of the adults in the photos that Shannon Hicks took. (The square-ups that follow are screen shots from those photos.) Obviously, not everyone can be positively identified. But here is a brief rundown of some principals:
Leading the lineup was Rachael Van Ness. Currently assigned to the Western District Major Crime Squad out of the Southbury Troop Barracks, she is also said to have served with the CT state police in this link. Mrs. Van Ness has a LinkedIn profile that also credits her for work as a “self-employed” “detective” as well as “writing and editing.” In this report, she is quoted as having apologized to Newtown families for not providing the CT state police reports “in advance of the release as we had always planned.” Timing is everything with Sandy Hook.
Although not caught on Hicks’s camera (to our knowledge), Officer Ed Benecchi is also credited with arranging the conga line outside of the school. From this article: “ ‘I told them we were going to play follow the leader and whoever kept their eyes closed would win,’ Trooper First Class Edward Benecchi wrote.”
We don’t know for a certainty whether the face at left (from the iconic photo) belongs to Amy Brackett Taylor, Room #5’s second-grade teacher. But she certainly does resemble the woman on the far left in a photograph at this link, identified as such. And her casual-Friday attire (white top, beige sweater, blue jeans) looks like the same ensemble worn by the woman at the far left in the photo of the running foursome:
So, why would Mrs. Taylor (or whoever the woman is) appear in two photos showing such disparate emotions? In the first, she appears calm and in control. In the second, she appears to be running for her life with a look of anguish. Which photo came first? And was this woman involved in two rescues or just one? Cinderella et al. admit to utter bafflement.
Mrs. Taylor is still teaching school in Newtown; however, to date, we could find no statements by her about the conga line, the breach of Room #5’s interior door, or Sandy Hook Elementary.
Not so in the case of another Amy Taylor associated with the St. Rose of Lima School, who made public statements about 12-14-12. Go here for more on the other Taylor.
This woman’s back is turned to the camera in the slideshow photo, but we believe that she may be the same woman in another dramatic photo that appeared (on December 14, 2012) in The Atlantic Monthly, heading up an article by Emily Chertoff (Michael C’s daughter). The blue jacket and size of the woman (click the link above) led us to this conclusion.
The children she is comforting in the Atlantic photo are Henry and Kelly Terifay, whom you can see identified if you go here. The woman in the blue jacket may be their mother, Lisa Papp Terifay.
We were unable to identify this dark-haired woman at left (from the “iconic” photo) dressed in blue stripes, wearing glasses. But what’s interesting is her resemblance to the dark-haired woman wearing blue stripes (but no glasses) in the “Running Foursome” photo, below. We have the same questions about this pairing as we do about the “Mrs. Taylor” photos.
Camera-shy. Let’s go back in time – to the Time.com article that examined the photos Shannon Hicks took on the fateful day. We call your attention to this excerpt from that article (bolded italics are mine):
“Regarding her photograph’s popularity — for lack of a better term — Hicks said it came as a surprise and brings little personal relief. It is the cache of photographs buried on her camera’s memory card, she said, that are hardest to look at and impossible to forget.”
Now let’s move forward a few months to March 25, 2013. That’s when James Tracy contacted Shannon Hicks to ask her about the availability of her photo cache. See the account below from page 305 of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook:
March 25 8:59AM
Newtown Bee Associate Editor Shannon Hicks responds to query from memoryholeblog on whether the multiple photographs she took at Sandy Hook Elementary as the shooting transpired have been shared with law enforcement or will at any time be made publicly available.
“The photos I took on 12/14 have not been shared with anyone,” Hicks said in an email. “We have no plans to do so, either. I would appreciate it if you consider this our final contact,” she continued. “I have enough work to do without getting involved in the kind of ‘research’ that continues to hurt those who live in Newtown.”
Shannon Hicks to James Tracy /Memoryholeblog.com [email in possession of author], March 25, 2013.
“Hurt those who live in Newtown”? Why would the release of “buried” photos “hurt” people who never seem to duck when a camera is in the room, creating as many photo-ops as their calendars can accommodate, writing books and reminding the public endlessly of the Sandy Hook experience?
Unless, of course, the buried photos would drag up issues similar to those explored in this blogpost.
The double-axe. As discussed at the top of this post, the origin of the word “labyrinth” is a tough little root that means “double axe,” associated with royalty. It’s our opinion, based on the above, that the Sandy Hook “royal family” wielded a psychological axe of dual timelines and dual roles for participants in the masque. Unless you see the duplicity for what it is – half-mockery, half-illusion – you are doomed to wander the maze forever, searching in vain for the exit door.
H/T: “Sandy Hooked”
1 The temperatures in the link are from neighboring Danbury on 12-14-12. Be sure to click on the View button, then scroll down to Daily Observations for Fri Dec 14 2012. Not until 8:53 a.m. EST did recorded temperatures rise to 34 degrees F. All other recorded temperatures before that time are below freezing.
Yesterday, the unfunny and violent comedienne Kathy Griffin, who had threatened to decapitate President Trump, tweeted this charming message (h/t Tony Whitcomb):
Chuck Grassley (IA), Orrin Hatch (UT), John Cornyn (TX), Thom Tillis (NC), Mike Lee (UT), Ben Sasse (NE), Ted Cruz (TX), Mike Crapo (ID), John Kennedy (LA), and Lindsey Graham (SC) are all Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee who will vote to confirm U.S. District Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court.
The remaining Republican, the 11th, on the committee is RINO Jeff Flake (AZ).
The three tweets below are the best responses to Griffin’s charming tweet:
@RebeccaMbula: “I don’t think anyone would want to do that with you.”
Fact or Fiction: Only American citizens can hold public office. The most common, obvious answer would be yes. Just imagine how many problems we would have if we were to let foreign nationals into high ranking positions in our government. This could never happen. We have safeguards. I guess that depends on how you look at it. What about dual citizenship? A topic worthy for debate.
“It always comes out in the wash” A phrase that I have used many times. A phrase that many others have used many times. For those that are not familiar with this phrase it basic meaning is ” truth will always prevail.” I would never use this phrase when it came to anything government related. I had lost complete faith in the government. It appeared that all common sense had “left the building.” Not enough people were “doing the right thing”. The ones that did were punished or treated as if it didn’t matter. That is changing. Slowly but still changing………. For the better. I hope these documents are of interest to you. They speak for themselves.
Part of why the letter was sent,
I have no doubt Kavanaugh will be confirmed. What if all this was just an attempt to run out the clock. Perhaps an attempt to delay FISA transparency. Something to think about.
Note: This article is based on collaborative research by Anne Berg, Alison Maynard and the author. For many readers, it will be a rehash. Its value, we believe, lies in evidence that the mainstream media and other official sources effectively confused the public with misleading information. It appears that we are supposed to accept the official sources’ many blunders and mistakes as “human error” while remaining convinced that only establishment media are qualified interpreters and reporters of the 12-14-12 incident. ~C.
In Ian McEwan’s novel Atonement, the rough (very rough) draft of a love letter is read by the younger sister of its intended recipient. The ensuing misinterpretations spell disaster for the writer, who is wrongfully accused and imprisoned for rape.
One misinterpreted letter can cause serious repercussions – as true in life as in art.
This is about such a letter. But in this case, the victims are the readers.
Many Sandy Hook researchers have asked why there is no surveillance footage of Adam Lanza as he blasted his way through the SHES front entrance window. From page 24 of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook:
“For example, in an era of ubiquitous video surveillance of public buildings especially no visual evidence of Lanza’s violent entry has emerged.”
Memory Hole Blog recently reposted a series of articles by James R. Hanson, an attorney with a long and distinguished record. Hanson gives as evidence for a hoax the lack of any crime scene photos. He refers specifically to a “new door camera system” installed in the fall before the alleged shooting:
“A coincidence that struggles for credence is that the new door camera system, proudly announced when installed last fall, did not record an assailant shooting through the glass entryway door and plunging inside. There is also no photograph of this door. Has it been replaced? If so, may we see the door that was in place that day? Do the school financial records show the cost of purchase and installation of a replacement?”
Wolfgang Halbig asked that same question and prepared FOIA requests to obtain work orders for the system. Ultimately, Halbig found himself the subject of organized mockery and persecution. Persistence is not treated as a virtue when it knocks on the devil’s door.
Yet, the question raised by all three of the above inquiring minds was perfectly legitimate. It was spurred, in part, by multiple mainstream media articles that describe the implementation of a front entrance security system still being tested, based on a letter said to have been written by Dawn Hochsprung herself. (Mrs. Hochsprung was the principal of Sandy Hook Elementary, allegedly one of Adam Lanza’s first victims.)
A letter with a long beard. A conscientious search on the Web turns up numerous articles by news sources that mention the system installation and/or Mrs. Hochsprung’s letter, among them:
One of the earliest articles to reference Mrs. Hochsprung’s letter comes from the CBS News article (posted at 7:05 p.m., 12-14-12), which reproduced it in full. See the letter below in quotes (boldface is mine):
“Dear Members of our Sandy Hook Family,
“Our district will be implementing a security system in all elementary schools as part of our ongoing efforts to ensure student safety. As usual, exterior doors will be locked during the day. Every visitor will be required to ring the doorbell at the front entrance and the office staff will use a visual monitoring system to allow entry. Visitors will still be required to report directly to the office and sign in. If our office staff does not recognize you, you will be required to show identification with a picture id. Please understand that with nearly 700 students and over 1000 parents representing 500 SHS families, most parents will be asked to show identification.
“Doors will be locked at approximately 9:30 a.m. Any student arriving after that time must be walked into the building and signed in at the office. Before that time our regular drop-off procedures will be in place. I encourage all parents to have their children come to school and return home on the bus and to remain in school for the entire school day. The beginning and ending of our school day are also important instructional times and therefore we want all our students to reap the benefits of full participation in our program.
“We need your help and cooperation for our system to work effectively. Our office staff is handling multiple tasks. Though they will work diligently to help you into the building as quickly as possible, there may be a short delay until someone can view you on the handset and allow you to come in electronically. There are times during the day when office personnel are on the telephone, addressing student concerns, or in the copy room; there are other times when only one person is in the front office. Please help our staff by identifying yourself and provide your child’s name.
‘Keep in mind we will be following our district guidelines which may need revision once we test the system.
“Please know your involvement continues to be critical to our school’s effectiveness and your child’s success. We continue to encourage and value your presence in our classrooms and are counting on your cooperation with the implementation of this safety initiative.
The letter contains all of the clues necessary to prove that the front entry system was not new, was not capable of surveillance, nor was it the fruit of efforts by “Mrs. Hochsprung.”
1. “700 students”: Four days before the alleged Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings, during a Newtown Board of Finance meeting, a report was provided, dated October 1, 2012, with head counts for all of the schools. See below: the SHES head count is listed as 454 students.
In the State’s Attorney Report, we find on page 9, footnote #13 the following: “On December 13, 2012, the student enrollment was 489. Official attendance had not yet been recorded as of 9:30 a.m. on December 14, 2012.”
However, a CityData page provides a census of 776 students at SHES for the year 2006. A lot closer to the “700” mark. This is a big hint that the letter probably wasn’t written in 2012, but much earlier, when the SHES census was up.
2. “Visual monitoring system.” This means a camera of some sort connected to a “handset” through which people could be observed. There’s no mention of a recording device.
3. “Mrs. Hochsprung.” Dawn Hochsprung usually signed with her full name and title, as shown (from the Sandy Hook Elementary School Handbook, 2010) below. The signature line on the above letter creates the impression that it was a prefab letter generated each year as a reminder, likely in a student rulebook.
The letter was likely written in 2007 by a previous SHES principal (Donna Page). In a 2007 annual report for the Newtown Board of Education (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3-vhpZ_3PTLOHZicm9UTFhuWUE/view), an expenditure of $4,322 was made for a “front entry security” system for Sandy Hook Elementary. The same amount was invested in systems for the Hawley School and Head O’ Meadow School. This is probably the system described in the letter by “Mrs. Hochsprung.” Not a new system, but a relatively old one.
More conflicting information from official sources. Oddly, the State’s Attorney Report (p. 21, following the pagination in upper left) refers to an elderly call box installed in 2005, not 2007. It describes a “camera,” but specifies that it was only for “monitoring,” not “recording.” Convenient.
It’s clear that the letter from “Mrs. Hochsprung” was old, creating multiple misperceptions. Was it fed to the media for that purpose? A non-existent surveillance camera could distract investigators from other glaring inconsistencies and anomalies, such as the doors of Room 5. (More about that in a future article.)
Or did the media find the letter and just spring on it, possibly to make the point that even a security system is no match for a lunatic with a gun?
One thing that’s certain is that a decrepit, shuttered school doesn’t need a new surveillance or monitoring system. In fact, the absence of one facilitated what I believe was a hoax.
Another letter. We also know that Dawn Hochsprung was a real fan of security technology thanks to another (undated) letter that her friend Gerald Stomski wrote to the Connecticut School Safety Committee, apparently sometime after 12-14-12. (See “Somebody who really died after Sandy Hook” for more on Mr. Stomski’s tragic death.) Here is an excerpt:
“In 2009 when I was elected as to [sic] the CEO for the Town of Woodbury, I met with then Principal Dawn Hochsprung regarding her writing a grant for security upgrades at Mitchell Elementary School. I questioned at the time, why were school administrators applying for and ultimately setting up security measures for their respected schools. Without possessing the necessary background in the fields of security and safety, I wondered if this was the most logical way of protecting our schools. Upon further investigation it was revealed to me that not only were administrators responsible for this activity, but that school maintenance workers, janitors, teachers and school administrators were responsible for these safety controls. Questionable decisions at best.
“I worked with Dawn Hochsprung on writing a successful grant and assisted her with the proper application and installations of these security controls for her school. Additionally, Dawn Hochsprung and I formed a relationship whereas we discussed on numerous occasions, what would need to be done should a shooter breach the school security, forcibly entering the school, and open firing once entered. Our discussions led to “trying to buy time” to “notify school teachers, staff and students that eminent [sic] danger was in their school”. Dawn and I even had discussions regarding “giving up your life” should it be necessary to protect her school and her children. She stated, “NOT ON MY WATCH”, would anyone be able to enter her school to conduct an act of violence against her school.”
Why settle? Given all of the above, why would Dawn Hochsprung, principal of SHES since 2010, settle for an inadequate security system for her school? Through no fault of her own, she inherited a monitoring system with no recording capability, as well as vintage 1956 windows that weren’t bulletproof at an entrance that was like a fishbowl. But given her proactive stance at Mitchell Elementary (Woodbury), why didn’t she follow suit at Sandy Hook?
Why settle for classroom doorknobs that locked only from the outside? Wouldn’t doorknob replacements be an expenditure that Mrs. Hochsprung would champion, given her past experience in obtaining security controls?
A building loaded with asbestos and black mold was bad enough. If building repairs were needed at SHES, the presence of these contaminants would have posed serious health risks. Given this, it’s fortunate indeed that – as stated in a Newtown school system report – the allotted budget for SHES building repairs for 2011-2012 was exactly $0.
Keyhole. To conclude, the letter signed by Mrs. Hochsprung was ultimately misleading. But the one signed by Gerald Stomski raises the questions we should have been asking all along about the doors at Sandy Hook Elementary.
It looks like things are heating up “Senate Judiciary today referred potential false statements alleging misconduct by Judge Kavanaugh to federal law enforcement for criminal investigation after accuserrecanted.” @senjudiciary