Category Archives: Sandy Hook massacre

An Essay on Sandy Hook

Maureen Crowley is the brave woman who, on March 3, 2015, spoke out on the Sandy Hook massacre fraud at a public hearing of Connecticut’s Public Safety and Security Committee.

Maureen Crowley

Maureen Crowley

For a video and transcript of her testimony, go to:
https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/03/06/citizen-speaks-out-on-sandy-hook-hoax-at-connecticut-state-committee-hearing/

Memory Hole

Submitted by Maureen Crowley

Since I wrote the following essay, I have confronted [name deleted], “embalmer of three Sandy Hook “victims” I told him to not fear the Connecticut Mafia, and that he should come forward with the truth. Inches from my face he screamed at me,,”not the Connecticut Mafia, the ITALIAN mafia”. Yes, it is my opinion that organized crime paid a huge role in pulling off the Sandy Hook Hoax. Also, when I dropped off the essay with the offices of Bishop Tobin of Providence, RI, he called the Rhode Island State Police, who then called crowleyme. Here is a slightly updated version of the essay.      

“The powerful conglomeration of interests that tried to pull off the events in Sandy Hook, Connecticut on December 14, 2012, must have realized the visual power of the medium of television. The beautiful children were where the emphasis was…

View original post 2,241 more words

Hillary Clinton uses Sandy Hook false flag to push for gun control

As predicted, in her acceptance speech last night at the Democratic National Convention, gun control is Hillary Clinton’s solution for the violence in our streets.

And as predicted, she made use of the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting massacre that took the lives of 20 little children, to manipulate Americans who feel instead of think.

Hitler children gun control

In her acceptance speech, Hillary said, referring to Donald Trump’s endorsement by the National Rifle Association (NRA), “And if we’re serious about keeping our country safe, we also can’t afford to have a President who’s in the pocket of the gun lobby.”

To tug at the heartstrings of gullible Americans, Hillary said:

“For decades, people have said this issue was too hard to solve and the politics were too hot to touch. But I ask you: how can we just stand by and do nothing? You heard, you saw, family members of people killed by gun violence.

By “family members of people killed by gun violence,” Hillary was referring to Erica Lafferty Smegielski, who was one of the speakers at the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday, July 27.

Erica Smegielski & Hillary Clinton (Getty Image)

Erica Smegielski & Hillary Clinton (Getty Image)

Smegielski is the daughter of slain Sandy Hook Elementary School principal Dawn Hochsprung who, we are told, was the first to be killed by Adam Lanza. Curiously, the dead Hochsprung managed to give an interview about the massacre to Newtown’s local newspaper, Newtown Bee. More curious still is the fact that the cache date of the Bee article featuring Hochsprung’s interview was December 13, a day before the massacre. See:

As recounted by Ricky Campbell for Heavy, July 27, 2016:

Erica Smegielski, the daughter of slain Sandy Hook Elementary School principal Dawn Hochsprung, is joining the likes of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Connecticut Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy Wednesday at the 2016 Democratic National Convention to tell her story, along with encouraging voters to support nominee Hillary Clinton and her stance on expanding gun control nationwide.

Smegielski, dedicated to closing gun law loopholes, has appeared in a Clinton ad called “My Mom,” where she says “no more families should have to go through what we have. Hillary Clinton is the only candidate that has what it takes to take on the gun lobby.

According to Heavy, Hillary “has put in a lot of effort this campaign to publicly talk with Sandy Hook families and discuss expanding gun control.”

In that “effort,” Hillary is aided by her willing accomplices in the media, notably CNN who, 3 days before the Democratic National Convention began, in the space of just one hour, obligingly flooded YouTube with one hundred Sandy Hook videos.

This is the same CNN whose live footage on the day of the Sandy Hook massacre inexplicably shows police and first responders running into an entirely different school than the supposed crime scene, Sandy Hook Elementary School. (See “CNN deception: Live aerial footage of police running into Sandy Hook was of another school“)

Back to Hillary’s acceptance speech last night.

Speaking out of both sides of her mouths, Hillary said:

I’m not here to repeal the 2nd Amendment. I’m not here to take away your guns. I just don’t want you to be shot by someone who shouldn’t have a gun in the first place.

We should be working with responsible gun owners to pass common-sense reforms and keep guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorists and all others who would do us harm.”

But the fact is we already have policies in place which are designed to “keep guns out of the hands of criminals”. It’s called background checks. So what other “common-sense reforms” that would “keep guns out of the hands of criminals” is Hillary proposing — reforms that she claims would not “repeal the 2nd Amendment” by further eroding the gun rights of law-abiding Americans?

Her campaign website affords a better idea of what those “common-sense reforms” means. It promises that “As president, Hillary will” do the following:

  • “Expand background checks to more gun sales—including by closing the gun show and internet sales loopholes—and strengthen the background check system by getting rid of the so-called “Charleston Loophole.”
  • Take on the gun lobby by removing the industry’s sweeping legal protection for illegal and irresponsible actions (which makes it almost impossible for people to hold them accountable), and revoking licenses from dealers who break the law.
  • Keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, other violent criminals, and the severely mentally ill by supporting laws that stop domestic abusers from buying and owning guns, making it a federal crime for someone to intentionally buy a gun for a person prohibited from owning one, and closing the loopholes that allow people suffering from severe mental illness to purchase and own guns. She will also support work to keep military-style weapons off our streets.”

Note that none of Hillary’s proposed gun reforms listed above would have prevented the Sandy Hook or the recent Orlando gay-club massacre because:

  1. The alleged lone shooter Adam Lanza’s guns were his mother’s, and Nancy Lanza obtained the guns legally by satisfying all background checks.
  2. The alleged lone shooter of Orlando, Omar Mateen, also obtained his guns legally. In fact, Mateen was an employee of G4S, a huge security firm with a multimillion dollar contract with the Department of Homeland Security to, ironically, identify suspected terrorists.
  3. Neither Lanza nor Mateen was a “domestic abuser,” had a criminal record (violent or not), or “severely mentally ill”.

So why then would Hillary use Sandy Hook to advocate for her proposed gun reforms that would not have prevented the massacre in the first place?

It doesn’t make sense. And, to quote Judge Judy, “If it doesn’t make sense, it isn’t true.”

Please don’t fall for Hillary’s ruse.

The Alternative Media have conducted diligent and exhaustive research on Sandy Hook, showing it was an elaborate false-flag to promote gun control. For exercising their First Amendment right of free speech, the researchers have endured online harassment, abuse, and death threats. Some paid an especially heavy price: film-maker William Shanley was arrested and imprisoned; tenured professor, Dr. James Tracy, was fired by Florida Atlantic University. (See “Sandy Hook: The hounding of Prof. James Tracy”)

For all the posts Fellowship of the Minds has published on this false flag, please go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page. See especially:

For the Orlando false-flag, please see our “Orlando Gay-Club Massacre” page, especially:

~Eowyn

Sandy Hook will be used for Gun Control at 2016 Democratic National Convention

We already know the MSM are willing accomplices of the Left. The latest example is a Democratic National Committee (DNC) email on an agreement with a Politico reporter to preview his story on Hillary Clinton’s campaign before he sent it to his editors. (See “Hacked emails show Democratic National Committee to be corrupt arm of Hillary“)

Now all signs are pointing to gun control being a center piece in Hillary Clinton’s upcoming acceptance speech as her party’s presidential nominee. Gun Control is her rebuttal to Donald Trump’s call to Law and Order.

The signs point to the reinvocation of the Dec. 14, 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting by the media and by the Democratic National Convention that begins today. The supposed shooting deaths of 20 little children will be used to tug on Americans’ heartstrings for gun control.

Sandy Hook gun control

Here are the signs:

1. Three days ago in the space of just one hour, CNN obligingly flooded YouTube with one hundred (!) Sandy Hook videos. (H/t Barry Soetoro Esq.)

See also “CNN deception: Live aerial footage of police running into Sandy Hook was of another school“.

2. The Democratic Convention will feature Sandy Hook speakers, including Erica Lafferty Smegielski, the daughter of slain Sandy Hook Elementary School principal Dawn Hochsprung who, we are told, was the first to be killed by Adam Lanza. Curiously, the dead Hochsprung managed to give an interview about the massacre to Newtown’s local newspaper, Newtown Bee. More curious still is the fact that the cache date of the Bee interview was December 13, a day before the massacre. See:

Hitler children gun control

Please don’t fall for Hillary’s ruse.

The Alternative Media have conducted diligent and exhaustive research on Sandy Hook, showing it was an elaborate false-flag to promote gun control. For exercising their First Amendment right of free speech, the researchers have endured online harassment, abuse, and death threats. Some paid a heavy price: film-maker William Shanley was arrested and imprisoned; tenured professor, Dr. James Tracy, was fired by Florida Atlantic University. (See “Sandy Hook: The hounding of Prof. James Tracy”)

For all the posts Fellowship of the Minds has published on this hoax, please go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page. See especially:

~Eowyn

Massachusetts AG going after “weapons of war”

Girlfriend obviously hasn’t read the Second Amendment. And I’ll bet money she’s never fired a civilian AR-15.

Article by Maura Healy (demorat), AG of Massachusetts since January 2015.

Gun grabber Maura Healey

Gun grabber Maura Healey

From the Boston Globe: Falcon Heights. Dallas. Baton Rouge again. Five horrific headlines in five weeks. Each story unique in its circumstances, but bound by a common thread: human lives taken by a gun.

There are myriad issues underlying each of these tragedies: fear, racism, mistrust, hate. These are critical issues that we, as a country, have an obligation to honestly and forthrightly address. And they’re issues my office is working hard to tackle alongside our partners in the community, in law enforcement, and in government.

But there’s one issue that can be addressed right now — the proliferation of guns, particularly assault weapons.

Here in Massachusetts, 10,000 assault weapons were sold just in the last year — each one nearly identical to the rifle used to gun down 49 innocent people in Orlando. In the week after the Pulse nightclub massacre, sales of weapons strikingly similar to the Sig Sauer MCX used at Pulse jumped as high as 450 percent over the previous week — just in Massachusetts.

It’s no surprise the Orlando killer chose an AR-15 style assault rifle. It’s a weapon of war, originally created for combat, and designed to kill many people in a short amount of time with incredible accuracy. It’s in the same category as weapons chosen by killers in Newtown, Aurora, and San Bernardino. These are not weapons of self-defense. They are weapons used to commit mass murder. And they have no business being in civilian hands.

Me with a weapon of war

Me shooting a “weapon of war”

How in Massachusetts, then, home to some of the strongest gun laws in the country, do we allow people to buy these guns? The gun industry has found a way to exploit our laws, a loophole of potentially horrific proportions. And it’s time we act.

The Massachusetts assault weapons ban mirrors the federal ban Congress allowed to expire in 2004. It prohibits the sale of specific weapons like the Colt AR-15 and AK-47 and explicitly bans “copies or duplicates” of those weapons. But gun manufacturers have taken it upon themselves to define what a “copy” or “duplicate” weapon is. They market “state compliant” copycat versions of their assault weapons to Massachusetts buyers. They sell guns without a flash suppressor or folding or telescoping stock, for example, small tweaks that do nothing to limit the lethalness of the weapon.

That will end now. On Wednesday, we are sending a directive to all gun manufacturers and dealers that makes clear that the sale of these copycat assault weapons is illegal in Massachusetts. With this directive, we will ensure we get the full protection intended when lawmakers enacted our assault weapons ban, not the watered-down version of those protections offered by gun manufacturers.

The directive specifically outlines two tests to determine what constitutes a “copy” or “duplicate” of a prohibited weapon. If a gun’s operating system is essentially the same as that of a banned weapon, or if the gun has components that are interchangeable with those of a banned weapon, it’s a “copy” or “duplicate,” and it is illegal. Assault weapons prohibited under our laws cannot be altered in any way to make their sale or possession legal in Massachusetts.

We recognize that most residents who purchased these guns in the past believed they were doing so legally, so this directive will not apply to possession of guns purchased before Wednesday. In the dozen years since the federal assault weapons ban lapsed, only seven states have instituted their own assault weapons ban. Many of those bans have been challenged (unsuccessfully) by the gun industry, and we anticipate our directive may be too. But our job is to enforce state laws and to keep people safe. This directive does both.

In the face of utter inaction by Congress, states have a duty to enact and enforce laws that protect people from gun violence. If Washington won’t use its power to get these guns off our streets, we will. Not only do we have the legal authority to do so, we have a moral obligation to do so.

molon labe

h/t Weasel Zippers

DCG

Liberal Hypocrisy: Terrorist Bill Ayers calls for gun control

If you need another reason to be skeptical about the Left’s and the Obama administration’s insistence on gun control, here it is:

Bill Ayers, 71, who ghostwrote Obama’s memoir and founded the domestic terrorist group, Weather Underground, advocates gun control.

Obama buddy Bill Ayers

Obama buddy Bill Ayers

In 1969, Ayers co-founded the Weather Underground, a self-described U.S. communist revolutionary group that conducted a campaign of bombing public buildings during the 1960s and 1970s, ostensibly to protest the Vietnam War. In 1970, two members of the Weather Underground (Ayers’ close friend Terry Robbins and Ayers’ girlfriend Diana Oughton) were killed when a nail bomb they were assembling in a Greenwich Village townhouse exploded.

Ayers participated in the bombings of New York City Police Department headquarters in 1970, the United States Capitol building in 1971, and the Pentagon in 1972.

Ayers has remained unrepentant. In a 2004 interview, Ayers was asked, “How do you feel about what you did? Would you do it again under similar circumstances?” He replied:

“I’ve thought about this a lot. Being almost 60, it’s impossible to not have lots and lots of regrets about lots and lots of things, but the question of did we do something that was horrendous, awful? … I don’t think so. I think what we did was to respond to a situation that was unconscionable.”

On June 14, 2016, Ayers sent out a tweet calling for a bill to ban AR-15 rifles:

Bill Ayers gun control tweet

The irony of an unrepentant terrorist calling for gun control was not lost on former Republican presidential aspirant Herman Cain:

Bill Ayers for gun controlIt’s also fitting that Ayers would propose naming the gun-control bill “The Orlando Sandy Hook Commemoration Act,” given that:

  1. Both the Sandy Hook and Orlando mass shooting massacres are false-flag fakes.
  2. No AR-15 rifle was used in either Sandy Hook or Orlando.

gun control false flagsH/t Barry Soetoro Esq. for the pic above.

See also:

~Eowyn

Adam Lanza’s dead ringer? Marcus Grimmie, brother of murdered singer Christina Grimmie

Christina Grimmie, born March 12, 1994, was a pop singer and a contestant in 2014 in season 6 of The Voice, finishing third place.

On Friday night, June 10, 2016, while she was signing autographs after her concert performance in Orlando, Florida, Christina was killed, shot four times by Kevin James Loibl, 27. Christina’s brother, Marcus Grimmie, tackled Loibl, who broke free, backed against a wall, and shot himself dead.

A little over 24 hours later, in the early morning hours of Sunday, June 12, 2016, also in Orlando, Florida, we are told a lone gunman named Omar Mateen shot dead 47 and wounded 53 in the Pulse gay dance club. (See “Orlando Gay-Club Massacre“)

On June 16, 2016, Christina was buried in a private ceremony in her hometown in New Jersey. At her vigil, her brother Marcus expressed his gratitude for the overwhelming support he and his family had received, and asked for prayers for the victims, and family and friends of the victims, of the Pulse shooting.

My friend who calls himself, tongue-in-cheek, Barry Soetoro, Esq., has a new video on his YouTube channel on the tantalizing notion that Sandy Hook killer Adam Lanza is alive, in the person of Marcus Grimmie.

Certainly, Marcus Grimmie resembles an older version of the fuzzy picture of Adam Lanza we have seen so many times in the media — same long face, long nose, similar hairstyle with bangs, same lower ears, though Lanza’s eyes are bigger. (By the way, why is it that the picture of Lanza is always fuzzy? I did a Google search, and every version of that pic is fuzzy. Here, try it yourself.)

Marcus Grimmie & Adam LanzaHere’s Soetoro’s video:

Here’s ABC News’ video of Marcus. Note that after Marcus said that Christina “loved the Lord, and she loved me,” the grey-haired guy behind Marcus bizarrely broke out laughing (0:18 mark).

Laughing grey-haired man reminds me of three other men who also bizarrely smiled/laughed at tragedy:

#1. The laughing policeman of Orlando shooting

Beginning at the 0:20 mark in the video below, as a spokesman talks to the press about the Orlando shooting casualties, behind him is a cop grey hair and moustache grinning and laughing.

#2: The laughing medical examiner and smiling policeman of Sandy Hook

The video below begins with Sandy Hook chief medical examiner Wayne Carver laughing as he gives a press conference about the dead, while a cop with a brown moustache standing behind him smiles.

Who knew shooting people dead can be so funny?

Or maybe the inappropriately smiling/laughing men can’t help suppressing their glee at getting away with a terrible crime. It’s what Pamela Meyer, author of the book, LieSpotting: Proven Techniques to Detect Deception, calls “duping delight“. (See “How to spot a liar“)

Remember O. J. Simpson’s “duping delight” at getting away with murder?

OJ Simpson duping delight

So I looked up Marcus Grimmie, and found a Mark Grimmie (Marcus is the Roman version of Mark) on two people search engines for which I have paid-subscriber access: Email Finder and Spokeo. According to both engines, Mark Grimmie lives in West Berlin, NJ, whose family members include a Christina Grimmie, who lives in Marlton, NJ.

Interestingly, Marcus/Mark Grimmie, who is married, is the same age as Adam Lanza would be. Both were born in 1992:

Adam Lanza died 12-13-2012According to Spokeo, Mark Grimmie’s family member Christina Grimmie resides in Marlton, NJ.

See also “Sandy Hook: The curious case of Adam Lanza’s ex-con funeral director” and our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page for links to all the posts we’ve done on this false-flag.

~Eowyn

Orlando gay-club shooting shows failure of government on every level

Once again, anomalies are emerging about Sunday’s massacre-by-shooting of 49 patrons of a “gay” nightclub in Orlando, Florida, by 29-year-old Omar Mateen.

Whatever the Orlando shooting turns out to be, which Fellowship of the Minds will tackle as we did with the Sandy Hook false-flag, one thing should be said about Orlando that no one in the MSM seems to have noted:

The Orlando gay-club shooting of June 12, 2016, reveals the utter failure of government on every level.

Among the many charges of government, the most important is to protect and ensure the safety and security of citizens.

But in the Orlando mass shooting incident, the present government of the United States of America has been an abject failure in discharging that responsibility — from the federal government of the Obama Administration down to the local government of the city of Orlando.

Orlando shooting policeBelow are the failed government agencies:

1. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Mateen was on the FBI’s radar for several years. An FBI spokesperson said that the FBI twice interviewed Matten in 2013 after he had made threats to a coworker, and once in 2014 after he was linked to an American suicide bomber. In both instances, the FBI found no sufficient evidence to continue with their investigations. As a result, Mateen was not under investigation or surveillance when he committed the massacre.

2. Bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives (ATF)

Omar Mateen had two licenses to carry firearms in Florida: a Class D license, given to security guards; and a Class G license, which is a general concealed carry license. An ATF spokesperson confirmed that Mateen was able to legally purchase guns, and bought both of the weapons used in the attack within the last week. (Gawker)

3. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

From September 2007 until his death, Omar Mateen was an employee of G4S Security Solutions USA.

G4S is a security contractor for federal government agencies, among which is the DHS with which G4S has a lucrative contract of more than $234 million. One of the tasks G4S is contracted to perform for DHS is to identify suspected terrorists trying to enter the U.S.  (See “Orlando terrorist-killer Omar Mateen worked for a security firm with DHS contract to identify suspected terrorist“)

Omar Mateen was a terrorist.

4. Orange County Sheriff’s Office and Orlando Police Department

According to a timeline of the shooting incident on June 12, 2016:

  • At 2:02 a.m., shooting erupts at the Pulse nightclub when the club’s uniformed security guard and two nearby officers open fire on the shooter, presumably Mateen, and “a gun battle ensues”.
  • The shooter then goes into the club, where he would shoot dead 49, wound another 53, and take the remainder hostage.
  • By 2:09 a.m., some 100 officers from the Orange County Sheriff’s Office and the Orlando Police Department had arrived.
  • At 2:22 a.m., shooter calls 911 to pledge allegiance to ISIS.
  • By 3:58 a.m., the phalanx of armed police assembled outside already knew the perp was shooting people inside the club because a post on Orlando Police Department’s official Twitter account says: “Shooting at Pulse Nightclub on S Orange. Multiple injuries. Stay away from area.”
  • At around 5:00 a.m., heavily armed SWAT team members use an armored vehicle to smash down a door at the club, clearing the way for some 30 people inside to flee to safety. SWAT officers confront the suspect in the doorway, shoot and kill him.

Police say they had to wait three hours to access the situation, get armored vehicles on the scene and make sure they had enough personnel.

In other words, for three whole hours, knowing full well that the armed perp was shooting people inside the club, the armed police did nothing, leaving the dying and wounded to fester. How many of the 49 who died would have lived if the police had broken into the club earlier?

Having failed to secure citizens’ lives and safety, our government — in the person of President Barack Obama — proposes that the solution is more gun control. In effect, this criminal regime not only does not and will not protect us, they want to take away the means for us to protect ourselves.

See also:

~Eowyn