Category Archives: global elite

Spontaneous Yellow Vests movement’s domain name was registered a year before in May 2017

The Yellow Vests movement is a mass movement that began online in France in May 2018 as a protest against a gas tax hike (of about 25 cents a gallon). The movement quickly metamorphosed beyond the internet when protesters, wearing yellow vests as a symbol, took to the streets rioting against high taxes, eroding living standards, and what many see as the government’s indifference to the concerns of France’s regions and ordinary people.

Note: Since 2008, all motorists in France are required by law to have high-visibility yellow vests in their vehicles when driving, as a safety measure should the driver be required to exit the vehicle on the roadside.

The movement has spread beyond France to Belgium and the United Kingdom.

“Yellow vests” is gilets jaunes in French. We are told that the Yellow Vests or Gilets Jaunes movement is a spontaneous popular uprising, so it is most curious that a Frenchman who calls himself Jean L. discovered that the internet domain name www.giletsjaunes.com had been registered on May 15, 2017 — a full year before the Gilets Jaunes movement actually began.

See Jean L, “Yellow Vests – Color Revolution Gone Awry?,” henrymakow.com, Dec. 21, 2018.

More curious still, the giletsjaunes.com domain name was registered in Denver, Colorado. Below is the domain’s registrar information from NameBright.com:

Registrar Level Whois

Domain Name: GiletsJaunes.com
Registry Domain ID: 2124542527_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS server: whois.NameBright.com
Registrar URL: http://www.NameBright.com
Updated Date: 2018-11-23T00:00:00.000Z
Creation Date: 2017-05-15T18:13:42.000Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2020-05-15T00:00:00.000Z
Registrar: DropCatch.com 1428 LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 3637
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@NameBright.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.7204960020
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry
Registrant Name: Private Registration
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 2635 Walnut Street
Registrant City: Denver
Registrant State/Province: CO

Registrant Postal Code: 80205
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.7204960020
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: GiletsJaunes.com@NameBrightPrivacy.com
Registry Admin ID: Not Available From Registry
Admin Name: Private Registration
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 2635 Walnut Street
Admin City: Denver
Admin State/Province: CO
Admin Postal Code: 80205
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.7204960020
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: GiletsJaunes.com@NameBrightPrivacy.com
Registry Tech ID: Not Available From Registry
Tech Name: Private Registration
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: 2635 Walnut Street
Tech City: Denver
Tech State/Province: CO
Tech Postal Code: 80205
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.7204960020
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: GiletsJaunes.com@NameBrightPrivacy.com
Name Server: brianna.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: pete.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System:
http://wdprs.internic.net
Last update of WHOIS database: 2018-12-22T02:50:38.995Z

The address of the domain name’s registrant — 2635 Walnut St., Denver, CO 80205 — is an office loft that LoopNet says is both “for lease” and “off market”. Here’s a street view of the building (I painted the yellow circle around the “For Lease” sign):

Jean L. also points out the pop-culture foreshadowing, aka predictive programming, of the Yellow Vests movement in The Economist‘s 2017 cover, specifically the modified “Hermit” Tarot card depicting hordes of yellow-garbed people protesting against globalization, holding flags against the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership), the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) and the EU (European Union).

The Rothschilds are shareholders (21%) of The Economist. (Wikipedia)

Meanwhile, elements in the French military are in open rebellion against President Emmanuel Macron.

As reported by Voice of Europe on Dec. 14, eleven generals, an admiral, a colonel and a former Minister of Defense signed a letter accusing Macron of treason for signing the UN Global Migration Pact that strips France of even more sovereignty, thereby providing anoother reason for “an already battered people” to “revolt”. The letter says mass immigration is erasing France’s “civilizational landmarks” and that “The French state is late in coming to realize the impossibility of integrating too many people, in addition to totally different cultures, who have regrouped in the last forty years in areas that no longer submit to the laws of the Republic.”

The pact, which was signed by 164 countries, has been protested by Yellow Vest demonstrations in five countries.

H/t Seumas

See also:

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Financial Times names George Soros ‘Person of the Year’ for promoting globalism, elitism and open borders

Founded in 1888, Financial Times (FT) is an international daily newspaper, headquartered in London, with a special emphasis on business and economic news. In 2015, Acquired in 2015 by Nikkei Inc. for £844m ($1.32 billion), FT is considered the most important business read, reaching 36% of the business-financial population, 11% more than its main rival, The Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

Financial Times has just named George Soros “Person of the Year” — the ever-scheming financier who made his billionaire fortune in the wholly unproductive currency-speculation and hedge funds, and who, through his foundations, foments and funds every Leftist, western civilization-destroying machination and movement, from racial protests and the “migrant caravan” invasion of America, to Europe’s open-border policy for Muslim “migrants” and “refugees”. See:

In the words of the Financial Times, Soros is Person of the Year because he fights the “extreme right” “forces of nationalism and populism,” which is FT‘s way of commending him for championing the left, globalism and elitism.

FT also stoops low by flinging the all-purpose “anti-Semitic” label at critics of Soros, which effectively shields him from every and all criticism.

Below are excerpts from Roula Khalaf’s nauseatingly fawning article, “FT Person of the Year: George Soros,” Financial Times, Dec. 19, 2018:

For a man facing daily attacks for his activism and liberal vision of the world, George Soros was in a curiously buoyant mood on a sunswept afternoon in Marrakesh. He had just visited South Africa, home to his first philanthropic foray in the late 1970s, when he funded black students under apartheid. This time he learnt that Soros-backed investigative media and civil society groups had helped thwart an allegedly corrupt nuclear power plant contract with Russia.

“It was a tremendous boost to reinforce my belief that we are doing something right,” says Mr Soros. “We haven’t stopped having a beneficial influence.”

Influence has come at a painfully high cost for the 88-year-old father of the hedge fund industry and one of the world’s most prominent philanthropists. From his native Hungary to his adopted America, the forces of nationalism and populism are battering the liberal democratic order he has tirelessly supported. The man once described as the only individual with a foreign policy must contend with the rise of strongmen across the globe — and a vicious backlash designed to delegitimise him.

The Financial Times’s choice of Person of the Year is usually a reflection of their achievements. In the case of Mr Soros this year, his selection is also about the values he represents.

He is the standard bearer of liberal democracy and open society. These are the ideas which triumphed in the cold war. Today, they are under siege from all sides, from Vladimir Putin’s Russia to Donald Trump’s America.

For more than three decades, Mr Soros has used philanthropy to battle against authoritarianism, racism and intolerance. Through his long commitment to openness, media freedom and human rights, he has attracted the wrath of authoritarian regimes and, increasingly, the national populists who continue to gain ground, particularly in Europe….

There are so many anti-Semitic conspiracy theories targeting Mr Soros that it is difficult to keep count. Hardly a day goes by without a statement, a tweet or an image depicting him as a master manipulator of global politics.

The venom, long concealed among extreme right networks, has leaked into the mainstream: Mr Trump, who resents Mr Soros’ support for the Democrats, has peddled allegations that he funded the caravan of central American migrants, claims that have appeared to have partly inspired the October attack on the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh.

Earlier that month, Mr Soros was the first in a series of Trump critics targeted with an explosive device sent to his suburban New York home. “I have been painted as the devil. The fact that extremists are motivated by false conspiracy theories about me to kill hurts me tremendously,” says Mr Soros. […]

In his twilight years, Mr Soros is looking beyond his formidable legacy. Having originally planned that his foundation would last his lifetime, he completed the transfer last year of $18bn from his family office to the Open Society Foundations. That reduced his fortune to $8bn, according to Forbes magazine, but ensured that his activism would take on a life of its own. And he has found a successor in philanthropy: his son, Alexander. “We fight for principles, we fight irrespective of the results, win or lose,” he says. And, almost as an afterthought, he says: “I don’t like to lose so much.”

About Soros’ son and heir, Alexander, see “George Soros’ son, Alex, is a ‘spirit cooker’?“.

By the way, the “explosive device” sent to Soros’ suburban New York home was a false flag. See “How we know package bombs sent to Democrats are false flags” and “Cesar Sayoc, package bomber: The pieces that don’t fit”.

What happened to Cesar Sayoc, about whom we’ve heard nothing since his supposed arrest?

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
0
 

French Roast

You Will Reap What You Sow

Like French Roast coffee, I will make this post short and bitter.

France has a long history of evil, persecuting christians, and supporting and harboring monsters. A city that gave shelter to the exiled Ayatollah Khomeini, Karl Marx, and a place for the leader of the PLO to hide his stolen billions, can expect a dark harvest.

I know there is much to love about the French, but there is also a parallel line of the country’s history that will demand justice. The infamous globalists are very comfortable in Paris. So also the terrorist organization known as Antifa.

America, take notice!  

You too will answer to the seeds you have sown.

Please follow and like us:
0
 

George W. Bush’s love-fest with Michelle ‘Big Mike’ Obama

In July 2010, in an article in the American Spectator, “America’s Ruling Class — And the Perils of Revolution,” Boston University Professor Emeritus made the trenchant observation that the real divide in America is not so much between liberals and conservatives as between the bipartisan political ruling class vs. the American people.

Whereas the majority of the American people are religious (Christians) and patriotic, the bipartisan “regime class” — stripped of their lip-service rhetoric — are irreligious, arrogant and contemptuous of the American people, and love neither America nor her people.

Read an excerpt of Codevilla’s long article here.

We saw another display of that bipartisan ruling class at RINO Sen. John McCain’s funeral on September 1, when former president George W. Bush, 72, behaving like an impish schoolboy, snuck a piece of candy to a beaming Michelle “Big Mike” Obama, as their respective spouses, Barack and Laura, smiled indulgently.

Who knew that a funeral is an occasion for jovial frivolity?

Wes Walker of Clash Daily points out this isn’t the first time George W. was cozy with Big Mike:

(1) Big Mike hugs George W. during the inauguration of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture, September 24, 2016:

(2) George W. kisses Big Mike, then the two hold hands and sing to one another at a memorial service for five slain police officers in Dallas, July 16, 2016:

And what was Big Mike doing with his hands in the laps of Barack and George W., as all three and Laura Bush grin as if they’re in on some private joke? What was so amusing at a memorial service for slain police officers?

Wes Walker observes:

Dubya must have finally paid off his Progressive Penance by opposing Trump’s nomination. Because it wasn’t so long ago that he was a racist, war criminal and literally Hitler.

For eight long years, the Obamas didn’t have a single nice thing to say about Bush. And now they’re best buds? He must not be the world’s most hated racist anymore.

Maybe it had something to do with Bush having joined the #Resistance.

George W.’s coziness with Michelle O. has not gone unnoticed.

Donald Francis Draper tweeted:

That tweet elicited these hilarious responses:

Michael L Arnold: “Bush gives Michelle a big boner”

Heather Terveld: “He likes men.”

NoMoreWhoresDC: “Broke Back Bush and the Tranny”

Ole George W. must have a thing for swinging nuts.

What’s that swinging in Michelle Obama’s pants?

See also:

H/t Kelleigh

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Bill Gates' foundation funds permanent contraception for Third World

Fri, 22 May 2015 17:16:07 +0000   eowyn2

Bill Gates is the multi-billionaire founder of Microsoft, whose net worth is estimated to be a mind-boggling $79.1 billion.

Via his eponymous foundation, Gates is also famous for his philanthropy, a word that the dictionary defines as “the desire to promote the welfare of others, expressed especially by the generous donation of money to good causes.” Gates’ idea of “good causes” is the reduction of the population of the world, in particular of the Third World, by hook or by crook.

In 2014, news came that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the development of a contraceptive microchip that can be remotely controlled to release hormones that can act as abortifacients — drugs that induce abortion — into a woman’s body for up to 16 years.

Not content with that, the Gates Foundation is now funding the development of a permanent contraception.

Bill Gates (l) and Jens "666"Stoltenberg (r)

Bill Gates (l) and Jens “666”Stoltenberg (r)

Note: Jens Stoltenberg is secretary general of NATO. For the “666” allusion, see “Another Candidate for the Beast.”

Lisa Bourne reports for LifeSiteNews, May 15, 2015, that a new sterilization drug for women will likely be developed and promoted worldwide thanks to a large donation from Bill and Melinda Gates.

Last October, the Gates Foundation gave Oregon gynecologist Jeffrey Jensen $5 million in grant money to develop nonsurgical “permanent contraception.”

Jeffrey Jensen

Jeffrey Jensen

Jensen, a gynecologist who’s also a professor at Oregon Health & Science University, said it’s all about putting a stop to unplanned and unwanted pregnancies. “My goal is very simple: to make every pregnancy planned and highly desired,” Jensen said in a report from the Portland Business Journal. He cited a study that he said showed 50 percent of Ugandan women no longer wish to become pregnant, but only two percent have access to “permanent contraception.”

Jensen and his associates have been researching an approach on rhesus monkeys and baboons which uses polidocanol foam, an FDA-approved treatment for varicose veins, which bypasses the cumbersome and lengthy regulatory process. If they are successful the next step will be human trials.

Jensen is working in partnership with Dr. Ov Slayden and Slayden’s team at the Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC), and they have established the Oregon Permanent Contraception Research Center (OPERM).

OPERM will supply grant funding, scientific expertise, a “nonhuman primate animal resource,” lab and procedural infrastructure, and administrative support to chosen investigators for assessing new nonsurgical contraceptive techniques, according to the Oregon University Health and Science website.

This latest multi-million-dollar Gates grant to prevent women from bearing children is just one in a lengthy list. Support for population control from Bill and Melinda Gates, under the guise of philanthropy, goes back year.

The news of the Gates Foundation’s funding for a permanent contraception has drawn condemnation from pro-lifers who warn of eugenics concerns.

Human Life International’s Stephen Phelan said the Gates Foundation’s obsessive focus on promoting contraception in the third world is based upon a faulty notion of what constitutes authentic ‘development,’ as well as highly suspect data about the actual desire for such contraception. “It is difficult to determine what is more outrageous,” Phelan told LifeSiteNews, “the uncritical and fawning ‘news’ reporting on every new Gates Foundation sterilization development grant even as coercive sterilization campaigns continue around the world, or the fact that the Gates Foundation continues to act as if every problem in the developing world can be solved by sterilizing women.”

Phelan also disputed the oft-cited claims that hundreds of millions of women in developing countries desire artificial birth control: “To simply repeat the claims of population control organizations, including the absolutely baseless claim that what 200 million poor women of color want most is the ability to stop becoming pregnant (where exactly did this statistic originate – let’s see the data) is reckless and irresponsible.”

Phelan also questions why foundations like Bill Gates’ focus their philanthropic efforts on population control when “what these women always say they want most when asked is better basic healthcare, education, opportunity, and just governance.”

See also “Warren Buffet gives $millions for abortions.”

~Éowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

German government officials get 'safer' vaccines

Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:56:31 +0000

eowyn2

Although the Spiegel report below is from 2009, there is no reason for us to think that the German practice of a 2-class vaccine system had ended, or that there isn’t one in the U.S. as well, wherein U.S. politicians have access to “safer” versions of the vaccines they inflict on us little people.

angela-merkel

From “Second-Class Medicine: Germans Unhappy with Alternative Swine Flu Vaccine for Politicians,” Spiegel, Oct. 19, 2009:

One might think that the arrival in Germany of the first of 50 million doses of swine flu vaccine on Monday might be cause for celebration. But with news breaking over the weekend that top government officials in Berlin will be injected with an alternative vaccine — one widely seen as safer — a debate about an alleged two-class medical system has erupted.

SPIEGEL over the weekend reported that Chancellor Angela Merkel, a number of her ministers and other government officials would receive a vaccine manufactured by the pharmaceutical company Baxter — the same vaccine that the German military opted for, as was reported last week. […]

The controversy centers on an additive included in the vaccine manufactured by pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline. The additive includes an inactive strain of the entire flu virus as opposed to virus fragments. Critics say the additive can increase the risk of side effects from the flu vaccine such as fevers and headaches.

Supporters counter that the additive is safe, and its use allows the drug manufacturer to quickly produce more doses of the vaccine. […]

An Interior Ministry spokesman told SPIEGEL that the Baxter vaccine had been ordered for all ministries and other agencies as well as for the employees of the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the authority responsible for approving vaccines.

Merkel’s spokesman Ulrich Wilhelm on Monday denied that Merkel was taking a different vaccine than the one available to ordinary Germans. He said that the Baxter vaccine had been ordered four months ago as part of a deal hammered out one year ago and has nothing to do with recent concerns surrounding the GlaxoSmithKline vaccine [aka Pandemrix]. […]

Leading physicians also complained about the planned vaccination. The head of the Institute for Hygiene and Public Health at the University of Bonn, Martin Exner, said: “The fact that politicians and top civil servants in ministries will be vaccinated with a vaccine other than the people is a terrible sign. Today politicians must take what they recommend.”

Virologist Alexander Kekulé Hall of the University Hospital said the fact “that the members of the Federal Government and the authorities have any other vaccine is a scandal.” […]

Some German politicians have joined Merkel in opting out of the alternative vaccine. Health Minister Ulla Schmidt said in Bild, “I will allow myself to be vaccinated with the same vaccine as the people. It is exactly like the other approved vaccine, safe and effective.”

The weekend scandal has drowned out a second debate which has been raging in recent weeks in the US and which has also found resonance here in Germany: whether such a massive vaccination program is necessary in the first place.

Wolf-Dieter Ludwig, chairman of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association, has called the planned vaccination campaign a “scandal.” “The health authorities have fallen for a campaign from the pharmaceutical companies, who simply want to earn money with an alleged threat,” he told SPIEGEL.

H/t Thought Crime Radio

Meanwhile, I still have not received a response to an email I’d sent 20 days ago to the Editorial Office as well as Editor-in-Chief Joav Merrick of the journal Frontiers in Public Health, inquiring why the journal deleted, without explanation, an article on childhood vaccination and autism after the journal had published it in its 2016 issue (4:270). The article was even scrubbed from Google Cache.

The article was a report by Dr. Anthony Mawson, Dr. Brian D. Ray, Dr. Azad R. Bhuiyan and Binu Jacob, of the findings of their study that found a statistically significant association between childhood vaccination and autism.

In an email, the study’s lead author Dr. Anthony Mawson informed me that Frontiers in Public Health‘s chief editor had pulled the article because of “complaints” based simply on the article’s Abstract, although the paper had been approved for publication by two peer reviewers, Kelly Hsieh and Linda Mullin Elkins, as well as by an editor, Amit Agrawal.

All of which means that Frontiers engaged in post-publication censorship.

See “New study finds link between child vaccination and autism – CENSORED”.

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Elite says given Brexit and Trump, elites must oppose ignorant masses

Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:40:07 +0000

eowyn2

On June 23, 2016, a political earthquake took place in the United Kingdom, the reverberations of which continue to shake up financial markets and power elites across the world.

On that day, Britons went to the polls to decide for themselves whether their country would leave or stay in the European Union (EU).

The result was clear. Despite threats, dire warnings of financial doom, and trashing of nationalism from Obama, UK Prime Minister David Cameron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and assorted bankers, the British people voted 52%-48% for independence and to leave the EU.

Brexit UK IndependenceAlready, there are machinations to reverse the will of the people. The media are trumpeting that millions have signed a petition to redo the referendum. But what they haven’t and won’t tell you is that the petition is fake. See here.

There is at least one thing the Brexit referendum has achieved: It has stripped away the mask from the faces of one-world global elites — for whom nationalism is a dirty word and, with their accomplices in the MSM, do their utmost to paint nationalists as extremist Nazi “nativists” — revealing them as the arrogant narcissists that they are, who think they alone have the right answers, with only contempt for us “ordinary” people.

First, President of the European Parliament Martin Schultz high-handedly dismissed the referendum. According to a reputable Italian financial analyst and trader, Schultz said, “The British have violated the rules. It is not the EU philosophy that the crowd can decide his fate.”

Schultz’s sentiments are echoed by James Traub — an East coast elite, Harvard graduate, journalist and author, contributing editor of the influential Foreign Policy journal, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a liberal Jew. (Wikipedia says Traub’s father, Marvin Traub, former chairman of Bloomingdale’s, “was born to a Jewish family…in New York City.”)

James Traub

I will let James Traub’s own words be his indictment.

Below is Traub’s op/ed, “It’s Time for the Elites to Rise Up Against the Ignorant Masses,” published in Foreign Policy on June 28, 2016, in its entirety. You’ll read for yourself his insufferable grandiosity, convinced that global elites like him and Hillary Clinton alone clearly see “reality” and have the answers, while the unwashed “masses” who disagree with him are atavistic, “ignorant,” knuckle-dragging, stupid, neo-Nazi (“far right”) “nativists,” as if loving one’s country — one’s native land — is a bad thing. I added the red bold highlighting.

I was born in 1954, and until now I would have said that the late 1960s was the greatest period of political convulsion I have lived through. Yet for all that the Vietnam War and the civil rights struggle changed American culture and reshaped political parties, in retrospect those wild storms look like the normal oscillations of a relatively stable political system. The present moment is different. Today’s citizen revolt — in the United States, Britain, and Europe — may upend politics as nothing else has in my lifetime.

In the late 1960s, elites were in disarray, as they are now — but back then they were fleeing from kids rebelling against their parents’ world; now the elites are fleeing from the parents. Extremism has gone mainstream. One of the most brazen features of the Brexit vote was the utter repudiation of the bankers and economists and Western heads of state who warned voters against the dangers of a split with the European Union. British Prime Minister David Cameron thought that voters would defer to the near-universal opinion of experts; that only shows how utterly he misjudged his own people.

Both the Conservative and the Labour parties in Britain are now in crisis. The British have had their day of reckoning; the American one looms. If Donald Trump loses, and loses badly (forgive me my reckless optimism, but I believe he will) the Republican Party may endure a historic split between its know-nothing base and its K Street/Chamber of Commerce leadership class. The Socialist government of France may face a similar fiasco in national elections next spring: Polls indicate that President François Hollande would not even make it to the final round of voting. Right-wing parties all over Europe are clamoring for an exit vote of their own.

Yes, it’s possible that all the political pieces will fly up into the air and settle down more or less where they were before, but the Brexit vote shows that shocking change isn’t very shocking anymore. Where, then, could those pieces end up? Europe is already pointing in one direction. In much of Europe, far-right nativist parties lead in the polls. So far, none has mustered a majority, though last month Norbert Hofer, the leader of Austria’s far-right Freedom Party, which traffics in Nazi symbolism, came within a hair of winning election as president. Mainstream parties of the left and right may increasingly combine forces to keep out the nationalists. This has already happened in Sweden, where a right-of-center party serves as the minority partner to the left-of-center government. If the Socialists in France do in fact lose the first round, they will almost certainly support the conservative Republicans against the far-right National Front.

Perhaps these informal coalitions can survive until the fever breaks. But the imperative of cohabitation could also lead to genuine realignment. That is, chunks of parties from the left and right of center could break away to form a different kind of center, defending pragmatism, meliorism, technical knowledge, and effective governance against the ideological forces gathering on both sides. It’s not hard to imagine the Republican Party in the United States — and perhaps the British Conservatives should Brexit go terribly wrong — losing control of the angry, nationalist rank and file and reconstituting themselves as the kind of Main Street, pro-business parties they were a generation ago, before their ideological zeal led them into a blind alley. That may be their only alternative to irrelevance.

The issue, at bottom, is globalization. Brexit, Trump, the National Front, and so on show that political elites have misjudged the depth of the anger at global forces and thus the demand that someone, somehow, restore the status quo ante. It may seem strange that the reaction has come today rather than immediately after the economic crisis of 2008, but the ebbing of the crisis has led to a new sense of stagnation. With prospects of flat growth in Europe and minimal income growth in the United States, voters are rebelling against their dismal long-term prospects. And globalization means culture as well as economics: Older people whose familiar world is vanishing beneath a welter of foreign tongues and multicultural celebrations are waving their fists at cosmopolitan elites. I was recently in Poland, where a far-right party appealing to nationalism and tradition has gained power despite years of undeniable prosperity under a centrist regime. Supporters use the same words again and again to explain their vote: “values and tradition.” They voted for Polishness against the modernity of Western Europe.

Perhaps politics will realign itself around the axis of globalization, with the fist-shakers on one side and the pragmatists on the other. The nationalists would win the loyalty of working-class and middle-class whites who see themselves as the defenders of sovereignty. The reformed center would include the beneficiaries of globalization and the poor and non-white and marginal citizens who recognize that the celebration of national identity excludes them.

Of course, mainstream parties of both the left and the right are trying to reach the angry nationalists. Sometimes this takes the form of gross truckling, as when Nicolas Sarkozy, who is seeking to regain France’s presidency, denounces the “tyranny of minorities” and invokes the “forever France” of an all-white past. From the left, Hillary Clinton has jettisoned her free-trade past to appeal to union members and others who want to protect national borders against the global market. But left and right disagree so deeply about how best to cushion the effects of globalization, and how to deal with the vast influx of refugees and migrants, that even the threat of extremism may not be enough to bring them to make common cause.

The schism we see opening before us is not just about policies, but about reality. The Brexit forces won because cynical leaders were prepared to cater to voters’ paranoia, lying to them about the dangers of immigration and the costs of membership in the EU. Some of those leaders have already begun to admit that they were lying. Donald Trump has, of course, set a new standard for disingenuousness and catering to voters’ fears, whether over immigration or foreign trade or anything else he can think of. The Republican Party, already rife with science-deniers and economic reality-deniers, has thrown itself into the embrace of a man who fabricates realities that ignorant people like to inhabit.

Did I say “ignorant”? Yes, I did. It is necessary to say that people are deluded and that the task of leadership is to un-delude them. Is that “elitist”? Maybe it is; maybe we have become so inclined to celebrate the authenticity of all personal conviction that it is now elitist to believe in reason, expertise, and the lessons of history. If so, the party of accepting reality must be prepared to take on the party of denying reality, and its enablers among those who know better. If that is the coming realignment, we should embrace it.

See also:

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

President of European Parliament on Brexit: contempt for will of the people

Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:05:58 +0000

eowyn2

On June 23, 2016, the citizens of the United Kingdom went to the polls to decide whether UK would leave or stay in the European Union (EU).

The result of the Brexit referendum was clear: nearly 52% (51.9%) favor the UK’s exit, 48% prefer remaining in the EU. (See “Political Earthquake: Brits vote to leave European Union!”)

According to a June 26, 2016 tweet by Giovanni Zibordi (@gzibordi), an Italian financial advisor and Cobraf trader, President of the European Parliament Martin Schultz high-handedly dismissed the Brexit referendum:

“gli inglesi hanno violato le regole. Non è la filosofia UE che la folla possa decidere del suo destino”

Translated into English:

“The British have violated the rules. It is not the EU philosophy that the crowd can decide his fate.”

Here’s a screenshot of the tweet:

Zibordi tweet of Martin SchultzMartin Schultz, 60, is a German politician who is the twice-elected President of the European Parliament (since 2012). Before that, he was leader of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament. Schulz is widely considered an ardent EU supporter.

As president, Schultz presides over the Parliament’s debates and activities, as well as represents the Parliament within the EU and internationally. His signature is required for enacting most EU laws and the EU budget.

How has Britain “violated the rules”?

Before the 2007 Treaty of Lisbon that is the constitutional basis of the EU, the question of whether a member state of the EU had a legal right to leave the union was unclear. But the Lisbon Treaty contains an exit clause (Article 50) for members wanting to withdraw from the Union, which states:

“Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.”

What is required is that a member state must inform the European Council before it can terminate its membership, and a withdrawal agreement would then be negotiated between the EU and that State.

In fact, in 1985, both Greenland and Algeria had voted to leave the EU’s predecessor, the European Economic Community (EEC). Following last Thursday’s Brexit referendum, the UK is expected to activate the withdrawal clause and begin exit negotiations within a few months.

Good to know that the President of the European Parliament has such utter contempt for both the British people and for democracy, rule by the people. /sarc

See also:

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

Secretive Bilderberg global elite meet in England

Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:35:22 +0000

eowyn2

Does this man look crazy to you?

Gerard BattenHe is Gerard Batten, not a tinfoil-hat looney tune but a member of the European Parliament for London for the United Kingdom Independence Party.

In a speech on September 12, 2011, at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France, Batten asked the question that should be asked of every reporter in the U.S. and across the world: “Why are the media so completely and totally disinterested in the yearly meeting of a group of the world’s most powerful and influential people?”

Batten said: “What other summit of world leaders in politics, finance and business would go completely unreported in the mainstream media such as the BBC? It’s impossible not to reach the conclusion that the non-reporting of these events is anything other than a conspiracy between the [Bilderberg] organizers and the media. It merely confirms the belief of many that the hidden agenda and purpose of the Bilderberg Group is to bring about undemocratic world government.”

Watch a video of Batten’s speech by going to my post of Sept. 23, 2011, “There Really is a World Conspiracy by the Powerful.”

From Wikipedia:

The Bilderberg Group (aka Bilderberg conference or Bilderberg Club) is an annual, unofficial, invitation-only conference of approximately 120 to 140 guests from North America and Western Europe, most of whom are people of influence. About one-third are from government and politics, and two-thirds from finance, industry, labour, education and communications. Meetings are closed to the public and often feature future political leaders shortly before they become household names. […] Meetings are organized by a steering committee with two members from each of approximately 18 nations.

Here are the chairmen of the Bilderberg Group’s Steering Committee. Betcha you’ve never heard of these men. Why’s that?:

Grove HotelYesterday, delegates in blacked-out cars arrived for the secretive 3-day Bilderberg 2013 summit at The Grove, a luxury country hotel near Watford, Hertfordshire, England. Protected by the biggest security operation Watford has ever seen, the delegates were heckled by protesters as their cars disappeared down the driveway. When asked about the difficulty in seeing Bilderberg VIP’s through the parade of tinted windows, American Free Press journalist Mark Anderson wryly said, “The dark windows match the dark personalities inside”.

Bilderberg Group delegates arriveBilderberg 2013b

Protesters did manage to take some photos of arriving attendees in their cars, although one man shielded his face with the Daily Mail newspaper like some perp being brought in handcuffs to the police station (see below). For the other photos, click here. (H/t FOTM’s tina)

Bilderberg attendee

For the first time, Bilderberg actually made public the official list of Bilderberg 2013 attendees (American attendees are in red). But, as Global Research notes, the real interest will be in the attendees who are NOT on the list. They include Hillary “what difference does it make” Clinton, Bill Clinton, and David Rockefeller. All three had been spotted entering the Grove Hotel yesterday, by the UK’s Liberty Tactics team.

  1. Chairman: Henri de Castries, Chairman and CEO, AXA Group
  2. Paul M. Achleitner, Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG
  3. Josef Ackermann, Chairman of the Board, Zurich Insurance Group Ltd
  4. Marcus Agius, Former Chairman, Barclays plc
  5. Helen Alexander, Chairman, UBM plc
  6. Roger C. Altman, Executive Chairman, Evercore Partners
  7. Matti Apunen, Director, Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA
  8. Susan Athey, Professor of Economics, Stanford Graduate School of Business
  9. Aslı Aydıntaşbaş, Columnist, Milliyet Newspaper
  10. Ali Babacan, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister for Economic and Financial Affairs
  11. Ed Balls, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
  12. Francisco Pinto Balsemão, Chairman and CEO, IMPRESA
  13. Nicolas Barré, Managing Editor, Les Echos
  14. José Manuel Barroso, President, European Commission
  15. Nicolas Baverez, Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
  16. Olivier de Bavinchove, Commander, Eurocorps
  17. John Bell, Regius Professor of Medicine, University of Oxford
  18. Franco Bernabè, Chairman and CEO, Telecom Italia S.p.A.
  19. Jeff Bezos, Founder and CEO, Amazon.com
  20. Carl Bildt, Swedish Minister for Foreign Affairs
  21. Anders Borg, Swedish Minister for Finance
  22. Jean François van Boxmeer, CEO, Heineken
  23. Svein Richard Brandtzæg, President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
  24. Oscar Bronner, Publisher, Der Standard Medienwelt
  25. Peter Carrington, Former Honorary Chairman, Bilderberg Meetings
  26. Juan Luis Cebrián, Executive Chairman, Grupo PRISA
  27. Edmund Clark, President and CEO, TD Bank Group
  28. Kenneth Clarke, UK Cabinet Minister
  29. Bjarne Corydon, Danish Minister of Finance
  30. Sherard Cowper-Coles, Business Development Director, International, BAE Systems plc
  31. Enrico Cucchiani, CEO, Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
  32. Etienne Davignon, Belgian Minister of State; Former Chairman, Bilderberg Meetings
  33. Ian Davis, Senior Partner Emeritus, McKinsey & Company
  34. Robbert H. Dijkgraaf, Director and Leon Levy Professor, Institute for Advanced Study
  35. Haluk Dinçer, President, Retail and Insurance Group, Sabancı Holding A.S.
  36. Robert Dudley, Group Chief Executive, BP plc
  37. Nicholas N. Eberstadt, Henry Wendt Chair in Political Economy, American Enterprise Institute
  38. Espen Barth Eide, Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs
  39. Börje Ekholm, President and CEO, Investor AB
  40. Thomas Enders, CEO, EADS
  41. J. Michael Evans, Vice Chairman, Goldman Sachs & Co.
  42. Ulrik Federspiel, Executive Vice President, Haldor Topsøe A/S
  43. Martin S.Feldstein, Professor of Economics, Harvard University; President Emeritus, NBER
  44. François Fillon, Former French Prime Minister
  45. Mark C. Fishman, President, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research. [Novartis had used aborted fetal cells to produce vaccines, but claims that it is producing a new flu vaccine, Flucelvax, that does not rely on aborted fetal cell lines for its production.]
  46. Douglas J. Flint, Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plc
  47. Paul Gallagher, Senior Counsel
  48. Timothy F Geithner, Former Secretary of the Treasury
  49. Michael Gfoeller, US Political Consultant
  50. Donald E. Graham, Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company
  51. Ulrich Grillo, CEO, Grillo-Werke AG
  52. Lilli Gruber, Journalist – Anchorwoman, La 7 TV
  53. Luis de Guindos, Spanish Minister of Economy and Competitiveness
  54. Stuart Gulliver, Group Chief Executive, HSBC Holdings plc
  55. Felix Gutzwiller, Member of the Swiss Council of States
  56. Victor Halberstadt, Professor of Economics, Leiden University; Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings
  57. Olli Heinonen, Senior Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School of Government
  58. Simon Henry, CFO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
  59. Paul Hermelin, Chairman and CEO, Capgemini Group
  60. Pablo Isla, Chairman and CEO, Inditex Group
  61. Kenneth M. Jacobs, Chairman and CEO, Lazard
  62. James A. Johnson, Chairman, Johnson Capital Partners
  63. Thomas J. Jordan, Chairman of the Governing Board, Swiss National Bank
  64. Vernon E. Jordan, Jr., Managing Director, Lazard Freres & Co. LLC
  65. Robert D. Kaplan, Chief Geopolitical Analyst, Stratfor
  66. Alex Karp, Founder and CEO, Palantir Technologies [“Palantir” refers to the crystal ball-like seeing stones in JRR Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, which the demonic dark lord Sauron uses to communicate with and mesmerize those who gaze into the ball. Good grief. Why would any company name itself after that?] *UPDATE (June 14, 2013): Palantir is a CIA-funded startup that’s been called the “Mysterious Silicon Valley Company Helping the NSA Spy on Americans,but Palantir insists that its own “Prism” system for database mining has nothing to do with the NSA’s data-mining “PRISM” program.
  67. John Kerr, Independent Member, UK House of Lords
  68. Henry A. Kissinger, Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
  69. Klaus Kleinfeld, Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
  70. Klaas H.W. Knot, President, De Nederlandsche Bank
  71. Mustafa V Koç,. Chairman, Koç Holding A.S.
  72. Roland Koch, CEO, Bilfinger SE
  73. Henry R. Kravis, Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
  74. Marie-Josée Kravis, Senior Fellow and Vice Chair, Hudson Institute
  75. André Kudelski, Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group
  76. Ulysses Kyriacopoulos, Chairman, S&B Industrial Minerals S.A.
  77. Christine Lagarde, Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
  78. J. Kurt Lauk, Chairman of the Economic Council to the CDU, Berlin
  79. Lawrence Lessig, Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership, Harvard Law School
  80. Thomas Leysen, Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group
  81. Christian Lindner, Party Leader, Free Democratic Party (FDP NRW)
  82. Stefan Löfven, Party Leader, Social Democratic Party (SAP)
  83. Peter Löscher, President and CEO, Siemens AG
  84. Peter Mandelson, Chairman, Global Counsel; Chairman, Lazard International
  85. Jessica T. Mathews, President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  86. Frank McKenna, Chair, Brookfield Asset Management
  87. John Micklethwait, Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
  88. Thierry de Montbrial, President, French Institute for International Relations
  89. Mario Monti, Former Italian Prime Minister
  90. Craig J. Mundie, Senior Advisor to the CEO, Microsoft Corporation
  91. Alberto Nagel, CEO, Mediobanca
  92. H.R.H. Princess Beatrix of The Netherlands
  93. Andrew Y. Ng, Co-Founder, Coursera
  94. Jorma Ollila, Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell, plc
  95. David Omand, Visiting Professor, King’s College London
  96. George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer
  97. Emanuele Ottolenghi, Senior Fellow, Foundation for Defense of Democracies
  98. Soli Özel, Senior Lecturer, Kadir Has University; Columnist, Habertürk Newspaper
  99. Alexis Papahelas, Executive Editor, Kathimerini Newspaper
  100. Şafak Pavey, Turkish MP
  101. Valérie Pécresse, French MP
  102. Richard N. Perle, Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
  103. David H. Petraeus, General, U.S. Army (Retired). [Infowars says that former CIA Director David Petraeus is in attendance at the 2013 Bilderberg Group conference to help construct the “big data” spy grid.]
  104. Paulo Portas, Portugal Minister of State and Foreign Affairs
  105. J. Robert S Prichard, Chair, Torys LLP
  106. Viviane Reding, Vice President and Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship, European Commission
  107. Heather M. Reisman, CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
  108. Hélène Rey, Professor of Economics, London Business School
  109. Simon Robertson, Partner, Robertson Robey Associates LLP; Deputy Chairman, HSBC Holdings
  110. Gianfelice Rocca, Chairman,Techint Group
  111. Jacek Rostowski, Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister
  112. Robert E. Rubin, Co-Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury
  113. Mark Rutte, Dutch Prime Minister
  114. Andreas Schieder, Austrian State Secretary of Finance
  115. Eric E. Schmidt, Executive Chairman, Google Inc.
  116. Rudolf Scholten, Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
  117. António José Seguro, Secretary General, Portuguese Socialist Party
  118. Jean-Dominique Senard, CEO, Michelin Group
  119. Kristin Skogen Lund, Director General, Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise
  120. Anne-Marie Slaughter, Bert G. Kerstetter ’66 University Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University
  121. Peter D. Sutherland, Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
  122. Martin Taylor, Former Chairman, Syngenta AG
  123. Tidjane Thiam, Group CEO, Prudential plc
  124. Peter A. Thiel, President, Thiel Capital
  125. Craig B. Thompson, President and CEO, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  126. Jakob Haldor Topsøe, Partner, AMBROX Capital A/S
  127. Jutta Urpilainen, Finnish Minister of Finance
  128. Daniel L. Vasella, Honorary Chairman, Novartis AG
  129. Peter R. Voser, CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
  130. Brad Wall, Premier of Saskatchewan Province, Canada
  131. Jacob Wallenberg, Chairman, Investor AB
  132. Kevin Warsh, Distinguished Visiting Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University
  133. Galen G.Weston, Executive Chairman, Loblaw Companies Limited
  134. Baroness Williams of Crosby, Member, UK House of Lords
  135. Martin H. Wolf, Chief Economics Commentator, The Financial Times
  136. James D. Wolfensohn, Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn and Company
  137. David Wright, Vice Chairman, Barclays plc
  138. Robert B. Zoellick, Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics

Follow Liberty Tactics live reporting around the clock from this week’s Bilderberg 2013 online at the Guerilla Media Network, and also follow Liberty Tactics on Twitter here.

See also “Bilderberg meets to decide US presidential election,” May 31, 2012.

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0
 

There really are sex orgies of the global elite

Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:00:34 +0000

eowyn2

The corrupt-looking man whose picture you see above is Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the 63-year-old economist, lawyer, politician, member of the French Socialist Party, and former managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

He resigned in disgrace from the IMF last year when a New York hotel maid accused him of sexually assaulting her. Although that case fell apart, Strauss-Kahn still faces criminal charges of ties to a prostitution ring in northern France. His legal defense is at once creative and cocky (no pun intended) — that the authorities are unfairly trying to “criminalize lust.”

In an otherwise humdrum article about Strauss-Kahn in the New York Times on October 14, 2012, reporters Doreen Carvajal and Maia de la Baume dropped this fascinating little bombshell:

That defense and the investigation, which is facing a critical judicial hearing in late November, have offered a keyhole view into a clandestine practice in certain powerful circles of French society: secret soirees with lawyers, judges, police officials, journalists and musicians that start with a fine meal and end with naked guests and public sex with multiple partners. […]

The exclusive orgies called “parties fines” — lavish Champagne affairs costing around $13,000 each — were organized as a roving international circuit from Paris to Washington by businessmen seeking to ingratiate themselves with Mr. Strauss-Kahn. Some of that money, according to a lawyer for the main host, ultimately paid for prostitutes because of a shortage of women at the mixed soirees orchestrated largely for the benefit of Mr. Strauss-Kahn, who sometimes sought sex with three or four women.

But such orgies are not just for Strauss-Kahn because the NYT article proceeds to quote him in an interview with the French magazine Le Point,There are numerous parties that exist like this in Paris, and you would be surprised to encounter certain people.

The NYT article continues:

The investigation into the prostitution ring in Lille [France] ultimately swept up 10 suspects, including Mr. Strauss-Kahn. They knew each other largely through their membership as French Freemasons, according to Karl Vandamme, a defense lawyer who represents Fabrice Paszkowski, the owner of a medical supply company who played a crucial role in organizing the sex parties. […] Vandamme…said his client invested around $65,000 in party expenses, betting on the political rise of Mr. Strauss-Kahn.

The banker [Strauss-Kahn]…would typically arrive late for the more than a dozen parties, held over a period of about five years. There was a rhythm to the gatherings, with everyone dressed for a sit-down dinner…. Then over time, couples separated, “kisses were exchanged between one woman and another and between a husband and the wife of a friend” until the guests “all ended up nude.”

“Clandestine” lavish sex orgies of “the powerful,” costing around $13,000 each, “in an international circuit from Paris to Washington”…. “There was a rhythm to the gatherings” where “kisses were exchanged between one woman and another”….

In effect, Strauss-Kahn was describing something long rumored about on the Internet, in books, and in movies — ritualistic (“a rhythm”) sex orgies of the world’s upper elite whom some call the Illuminati.

Here are two segments from director Stanley Kubrick’s last movie, Eyes Wide Shut. The first video depicts a pre-orgy Satanic ritual in a lavish mansion, attended by masked and black-robed elites. Note how the naked young women in the circle exchange kisses (“kisses were exchanged between one woman and another”).

WARNING: nudity and simulated sexual intercourse

The second video shows Dr. Bill Harford, the character played by Tom Cruise, walking from room to room, observing the orgiastic sex:

In a long article on The Kentroversy blog (which I recommend you read in its entirety), Kent Bentkowski gives an analysis of the occult symbolism in Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut. Here are excerpts from Bentkowski’s article:

In 1999, an extremely peculiar film was released by legendary film director Stanley Kubrick, which would end up the sixteenth and final film he would direct in his career. […] The film, Eyes Wide Shut, was filled with the symbolism that astute researchers have come to recognize as the calling card of the Illuminati, the synarchist group of global rulers, who believe in rule by birthright, and who rule this planet by the ‘iron fist in a velvet glove’ divide and conquer methodology. […] Once this symbolism is understood, only then does the film begin to make sense. This film is a fitting metaphor for our times, as we face the reality of those among us who are asleep, and those of us who are awake, as our world has fallen under the influences of very dark and evil forces. […]

At the opening party at Victor Ziegler’s house, Alice Harford [the character played by Nicole Kidman] meets up with and dances with a Hungarian man. The name of this character is Sandor Szavost. This character shares his name with the creator of the Church of Satan, Anton Sandor LaVey. This would be an accurate analogy, as members of the global elite are all dedicated to either Lucifer or Satan. Their religion has them believe that both Lucifer and Satan are good [….] This type of thinking is extremely twisted, and represents what some have called a Satanic Reversal–evil is good, lies are truth, death is life, and darkness is light. […]

Of the films’ two and one-half hours, the most curious aspect are the thirty-five minutes that take place during Dr. Bill Harford’s trip to the masked ball […] the Illuminati sex-magick ritual […] which actually occurs behind closed doors in some of the most exclusive housing in the entire world. […] The chanting is in reverse, and is of a Romanian priest giving a mass in Latin. […]

Only four days after Kubrick turned in the final cut of EWS to Warner Brothers, he was ‘found’ dead by his wife. He had no heart trouble, and wasn’t ill before his sudden and shockingly unexpected death. […] However, according to William Cooper, author of the book BEHOLD A PALE HORSE, and the forty-two hour series on the Illuminati and their Babylon mystery religion entitled MYSTERY BABYLON, stated during the second broadcast of MYSTERY BABYLON, that Stanley Kubrick was himself an initiate of the Mysteries. This helps to explain […] the MASKED BALL portion of the film, and his shockingly unexpected death [….] in making this film, director Stanley Kubrick may have made the fatal mistake of showing too much truth concerning a group of self-appointed global elite world rulers known as the Illuminati.

Here’s a video showing the Illuminati symbology employed by Kubrick in Eyes Wide Shut:

In her blog of November 13, 2012, “Night of the Long Knives Part 1,” Ann Barnhardt relates what the wife of a U.S. Army flag officer told her about a wife-swapping or swinger party. (Note that when you go to Barnhardt’s site, you’ll have to scroll down until you find that article because Barnhardt does not enable the reading of an individual post.)

When I was a teenager back in Leavenworth, Kansas, I had occasion to become acquainted with a German lady who had just married a US Army flag officer that she met while working as a civilian contractor on a US Army base in Germany. Her husband was transferred to Ft. Leavenworth, which almost all flag officers pass through at some point. She was a strikingly handsome woman and super-sharp. She was very happy and was eagerly trying to get pregnant and start her family, as she was 35 or so at the time.

The last time I saw her, she was in a state of shock. She had left her husband, was filing for divorce, homeless and trying to organize getting back to Germany. Here is what happened.

She had finally become pregnant. She had just found out and hadn’t even told her husband yet. They had been invited to and were attending a party being thrown by the post commander at his home that evening. Most of the upper-echelon flag officers at Ft. Leavenworth would be there. She was very excited and happy that she and her husband were literally now moving amongst the highest levels of the top brass in the US military, and she planned to tell her husband that night after the party that she was pregnant.

They arrived at the party in the gorgeous and huge old home of the post commander. In the foyer, there was a large bowl that all of the men placed their car keys into upon entering the house. She figured that this had something to do with drunk driving protections, as there was certainly drinking at this party. She thought nothing of it.

As midnight rolled around, the party suddenly concluded. All of the couples then moved into the foyer. One by one, the wives stepped up to the bowl full of keys and drew out a set at random. The wives then matched the keys up with their male owners and then left with that man.

It was a wife-swapping party.

When my acquaintance realized what was going on she refused. Her husband was livid.

When she got home she packed a bag and left. The stress of going from being on top of the world and happier than she had ever been to having her marriage destroyed, being betrayed so casually and sickeningly by her husband, and being made essentially homeless and penniless in a span of about five minutes caused her to immediately miscarry the baby a few hours later.

Barnhardt continues in “Night of the Long Knives Part 2”:

Wife-swapping and other perverse, orgiastic activities are extremely common among the US flag officer corps. The level of bizarre sexual depravity we are seeing with [General David] Petraeus and now [General John R.] Allen, is common to the point of being pedestrian. It is exactly the same kind of sodomitical filth that pervades the political class. They are all sex perverts and cheats. Find me a flag officer or politician that isn’t cheating on his spouse or a pervert and I’ll be shocked. Sexual perversion is intrinsic to this class of people. These people are psychopathically insane, because you would have to be psychopathically insane to want anything to do with either the political class OR the flag officer corps today.

I can’t tell you how many emails I have received over the last year and a half from men who have exited the United States Military as either a Captain or Major because they simply could not bear to be a part of the repulsive, honorless, amoral culture. They couldn’t advance because at a certain point you literally have to sell your soul and become a purely political animal in order to climb the ladder.

And are you really surprised? Every single flag officer in the United States Military today is, by definition, an oath-breaking traitor. Barack Obama is not eligible to be POTUS and is almost certainly not a U.S. citizen. And not ONE WORD. Not one word from the flag officer corps. Why? Because they are politicians at heart, and they will never do anything to jeopardize their O-7, O-8, O-9 or O-10 pension packages.

Am I surprised that Petraeus and Allen and the rest are pathetic, pervy fornicators with the common sense of a pile of toenail clippings? Am I surprised that Petraeus was sending dozens and dozens of emails per day to his girlfriend and that their pillowtalk included national security secrets? Am I surprised that Petraeus and Allen have spent their careers walking around with a “BLACKMAIL ME” sign taped to their backs? Nope. These people are imbeciles and psychopaths who implemented and oversaw rules of engagement that have intentionally gotten our boys killed as a literal sacrifice of total submission to islam. Watch this and then tell me what an intelligent and honorable man David Petraeus is:

Like probably a lot of you reading this, I was skeptical about claims of a Satanic global elite, whether it’s called the Illuminati or not, who engage in ritualistic sex orgies and pedophilia (see Nick Bryant’s The Franklin Scandal). But Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s admission of participating in lavish “sex parties” attended by the powerful “from Paris to Washington” should give the skeptics pause.

For Wikipedia’s account of the Petraeus sex scandal, go here. For General Allen’s exchanges of countless flirtatious and suggestive email with a married Florida socialite, go here.

See also:

Update (July 30, 2013):

Vigilant Citizen has an outstanding series of articles on Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut. Here are Part 1 and Part 2 of the series.

See also creepy pics from a 1972 mask ball thrown by the Rothchilds in the UK. Click here. Look in particular at the 3rd to last photo — of a table centerpiece comprised of mutilated baby dolls. Hint at child sacrifice? Sick!

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:
0