Category Archives: Radical feminists

Lesbian Episcopal priest is new head of National Abortion Federation

Abortion is the deliberate and intentional killing of an unborn human being. In the United States and countless countries across the world, in the name of a woman’s “right” over her body, that killing is given legitimacy by law and vehemently defended by “feminists”.

The pro-abortion movement is nothing less than a demonic death cult. In recent years, the unremitting corruption of the United States has even led to Christian and Jewish clergy “blessing” abortion clinics. See, for example:

Now, a lesbian Episcopal priest, the “very reverend” Katherine Hancock Ragsdale, takes the abomination further by becoming the president and CEO of the National Abortion Federation (NAF) — a multinational organization of abortion providers and practitioners in the United States, Mexico, Canada, Australia, and many Eurpean countries. According to the NAF, its members “perform” half of all abortions in North America.

Ragsdale is the president and professor of theology of the Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge, Massachusetts. In a speech at a Jan. 24, 2010 event organized by the Jane Fund, a Massachusetts-based group that raises funds for abortions, Ragsdale called abortion “a blessing” and said she was “angry and fed up” at people who had spoken out again her sexuality and her radical stance on abortion.

Claire Chretien reports for LifeSiteNews, Nov. 5, 2019, that the National Abortion Federation (NAF) has announced that its new president and CEO is Katherine Ragsdale, a lesbian Episcopal “priest” and longtime abortion activist.

When the news was announced, Ragsdale, who had been NAF’s interim president and CEO since September 2018, extolled abortion providers as “some of my personal heroes and modern-day saints.”

NAF’s previous CEO and president, Vicki Saporta, was paid a salary of $392,018 in 2017, according to the organization’s publicly available tax records.

In 2011, Ragsdale married another female Episcopal priest named Mally Lloyd. at the Anglican Cathedral Church of St. Paul in Boston. Bishop M. Thomas Shaw performed the ceremony. It is unclear if Ragsdale and Lloyd are still together, as Ragsdale’s bio on NAF’s website makes no mention of Lloyd.

In an April 2019 speech at a Kentucky Reproductive Freedom Fund fundraiser, Ragsdale claimed that the Bible says nothing about abortion and that it’s dishonest and manipulative to call the human person in the womb a “baby.” Her audience laughed when Ragsdale mocked pro-life advocates who oppose partial-birth abortion by saying: “‘One inch from life,’ they say while showing a picture of a Gerber baby. Apart from ‘one inch from life’ being a lie, the Gerber baby image is a lie. And actually, using the word ‘baby’ is a manipulative lie.”

Comments by NAF-affiliated abortionists, however, paint a different picture. Undercover video from the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), a prolife organization founded by journalist David Daleidan, taken at a NAF conference shows abortionists admitting that the work they do is “killing,” complaining how “difficult” it is to tear apart a fetus, and lamenting that they’re not given a place to discuss the “heads that get stuck that we can’t get out.”

See also “S.F. jury awards Planned Parenthood $2.2M in damages against pro-life journalist David Daleidan

Notorious late-term abortionist LeRoy Carhart, at least eight of whose “patients” had a “medical emergency” in the course of their abortion, also admitted to a BBC reporter, “I think that it is a baby, and I use [the word] with patients.” When the reporter hesitantly asked, “And you don’t have a problem…with…killing a baby?,” Carhart said without flinching, “I have no problem if it’s in the mother’s uterus.”

Father Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life and president of the National Pro-Life Religious Council, told LifeSiteNews:

“For decades, Katherine Ragsdale, a false prophet, has been trying to put religious vestments on child-killing. She led the ‘Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights’ (now the ‘Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice’), which actually provides rites of blessing for parents about to kill their children, and for the facilities in which the blood is shed…[and also provides] Scripture studies that attempt to say exactly the opposite of what Scripture says about what God thinks of the shedding of innocent blood.”

Fr. Pavone said it’s not surprising that NAF chose Ragsdale to lead it:

“It actually reveals one of the greatest weaknesses of the abortion industry: science is not on their side, logic is not on their side, and history is not on their side. They ran out of arguments a long time ago to try to justify abortion. So now, all they have left is to disguise it in ‘spirituality.’ They try in vain to take the stigma out of abortion — but that effort continues, and that is what this new development represents.

For decades, Fr. Pavone has helped helps former abortionists and their staff “deal with the wounds abortion inflicts on them.” He said:

“A big part of their healing is to dig themselves out of the many layers of lies that they told themselves to justify the killing they carried out. Those lies take many forms: rationalization; intellectualization; and here, in the example of False Prophet Ragsdale’s leadership, ‘spiritualization.’ And the lies by which spiritual and biblical language attempt to justify murder are among the most damaging to those who fall captive to them.”

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

We must #BelieveWomen: Child rapist and Hollyweird hero Polanski denies latest rape allegation

From MSN: In an article in Le Parisien on Friday, Valentine Monnier alleged that Polanski raped her violently at a ski chalet in Gstaad, Switzerland, in 1975. The allegation cannot result in any criminal charges because Switzerland’s 20-year statute of limitations has passed.

In a statement issued to Agence-France Presse on Sunday, Polanski’s French attorney, Hervé Témime, said that the filmmaker “most firmly contests the accusation of rape….We are considering taking legal action against this publication.” Témime said Polanski “will not participate in the media trial, and me neither.”

The lawyer added that the allegation “concerns facts that are 45 years old. Never has this accusation been brought to Polanski’s knowledge, and neither to a judicial institution, except for a letter sent to the California prosecutor two years ago, according to Le Parisien.” Témime said that “it’s impossible after so much time to gather all the necessary elements to conduct a [proper] investigation.”

Polanski has been living in exile in France since fleeing the U.S. in 1978, before he could be sentenced after pleading guilty to having sex with a 13-year-old girl. Numerous efforts over the years to resolve the case with Los Angeles prosecutors have gone nowhere, as Polanski has refused to return and submit to U.S. jurisdiction.

In spite of the controversy that has surrounded Polanski for the past decades, he was able to get his new film, “An Officer and a Spy” (“J’accuse”), financed mainly out of France with a budget of $21 million, making it one of the country’s most ambitious films this year. But the new allegation by Monnier has cast cloud over the film’s imminent release in France on Wednesday on more than 500 screens.

On Sunday, the movie’s leading actor, Oscar-winner Jean Dujardin, canceled an appearance on a primetime newscast to promote the film.

On the critical front, “An Officer and a Spy” has been applauded. It world premiered at the Venice Film Festival, where it won the Silver Lion Grand Jury Prize, and has just garnered four European Film Awards nominations. “An Officer and a Spy” has also been bought by distributors in several territories.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Don’t kid yourself: The corporate liberals care nothing about protecting women

Ever since the #MeToo movement started, we’ve been told by democats that we must #BelieveWomen.

Yet when it comes to telling womens’ stories of abuse and harassment, the media and progressives do everything they can to bury the stories to protect their friends in high places.

Apparently it’s only acceptable to #BelieveWomen when they accuse republican men (even with scant-to-no proof).

NBC killed Ronan Farrow’s expose on Harvey Weinstein in their desire to protect predators.

ABC News spiked a story exposing the truth behind pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Obviously, the above two stories have a certain power couple connection – the Clintons. Funny how the two alphabets killed these stories at the time Hillary Clinton was running for president. Just a coincidence, I guess.

Now comes word that Nike is apparently victim-shaming a women runner who claims that Nike’s former trainer, Alberto Salazar , put her through physical and mental abuse.

The NY Post reports that athlete Mary Cain, while working with Salazar on Nike’s Oregon Project, the coach forced her to lose weight and ignored her acts of self-harm. Just 17 at the time, Cain describes scenes where Salazar would weigh her in front of her teammates and publicly shame her if she wasn’t hitting her weight.

Nike cut ties with Salazar this year after he was banned for 4 years from athletics for doping offenses.

Nike says they will launch an investigation and from their statement: “These are deeply troubling allegations which have not been raised by Mary or her parents before. Mary was seeking to rejoin the Oregon Project and Alberto’s team as recently as April of this year and had not raised these concerns as part of that process.”

The NY Post says that other women are backing Cain’s claims. From their report:

Multiple prominent runners, including New York City Marathon winner Shalane Flanagan, have spoken out in support of Cain. Olympic runner Kara Goucher backed up Cain’s allegations and criticized Nike’s handling of the situation on Twitter Friday.

“So [Nike] responds to [Cain],” Goucher wrote. “Takes the time to victim shame Mary, before saying they will investigate. I hope you come to me, because I have stories to match all of Mary’s claims and so much more. Don’t let this be more lip service, actually do something.

Read the whole NY Post story here.

As a result of this scandal, Nike CEO Mark Parker is stepping down to become executive chairman of the company on January 13, 2020. He endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in 2016.

Just another example of progressives’ and their double standards: They claim to care about women yet put politics, power and profits over the truth and well-being of women.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Ronan Farrow says Bill Clinton should be investigated for ‘credible’ rape accusations

Ronan Farrow, 31, the son of actress Mia Farrow and Woody Allen, is an investigative journalist who sparked the #MeToo movement by uncovering Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein’s sexual abuses in articles in The New Yorker in late 2017, which won the magazine the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service. Farrow then investigated and exposed sexual abuse allegations against New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and CBS Chairman/CEO Les Moonves, which led to the resignations of both in 2018.

Although Farrow is a liberal and despite his association with Hillary Clinton (in 2011, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appointed Farrow as her Special Adviser for Global Youth Issues and Director of the State Department’s Office of Global Youth Issues), he has demonstrated his journalistic objectivity by saying that an investigation into “credible” rape accusations against former President Bill Clinton is long “overdue”.

Farrow said that in an interview last Friday night, November 1, 2019, on HBO’s “Real Time With Bill Maher”.

As reported by Fox News, Farrow told Maher, “Bill Clinton…has been credibly accused of rape. That has nothing to do with gray areas. I think that the Juanita Broaddrick claim has been overdue for revisiting,” and that Bill wouldn’t escape scrutiny today because society’s views on sexual misconduct have “changed.”

In an interview with Dateline NBC that aired on February 24, 1999, former nursing home administrator Juanita Broaddrick said then-Arkansas Attorney General Bill Clinton raped her in 1978 during his gubernatorial campaign.

As recounted by Broaddrick to Dateline NBC, she had offered to volunteer for Clinton’s campaign. On April 25, 1978, Broaddrick was attending a nursing home meeting at the Camelot Hotel in Little Rock, Arkansas. Bill Clinton suggested that instead of meeting in the hotel’s coffee shop, they meet “for coffee” in her hotel room that she was sharing with her friend and employee Norma Rogers, so as to avoid a crowd of reporters in the hotel lobby. Broaddrick said:

“Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip … He starts to, um, bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him ‘No,’ that I didn’t want this to happen but he wouldn’t listen to me…. It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to ‘Please stop.’ And that’s when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip…. When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says ‘You better get some ice on that.’ And he turned and went out the door.”

Broaddrick’s roommate Norma Rogers said she returned to their hotel room to find Broaddrick on the bed “in a state of shock”, with her pantyhose torn in the crotch and her lip swollen as though she had been hit. Broaddrick told her Clinton had “forced himself on her”. Rogers helped Broaddrick ice her lip, and then the women left Little Rock. Rogers said that Broaddrick was very upset on the way home and blamed herself for letting Clinton in the room. Broaddrick also confided in four other persons about the rape.

Since 1999 when she first went public with her rape accusation, Broaddrick has persisted in her charges against Bill Clinton, slamming Democrats for refusing to believe her:

  • In 2000, when Hillary Clinton was running in the U.S. Senate election in New York, Broaddrick published an open letter to Hillary, denouncing her for  covering for her husband’s rape.
  • During the 2016 presidential election, Broaddrick repeated her rape claims on Twitter: “I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73. …it never goes away.”
  • On October 9, 2016, Broaddrick appeared on a panel with Trump, Paula Jones, and Kathleen Willey an hour before the second presidential debate between Trump and Hillary Clinton. Bill Clinton was in the audience.
  • In January 2018, Broaddrick self-published a memoir, co-authored by Nick Lulli, with the title You’d Better Put Some Ice On That: How I Survived Being Raped By Bill Clinton.

Back to Ronan Farrow.

In his new book, Catch and Kill: Spies and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators, Farrow revealed that Hillary Clinton had tried to pressure him into not publishing the bombshell sexual allegations against Harvey Weinstein.

As described by The Hollywood Reporter on October 9, 2019:

Weinstein also attempted to leverage his long-term relationship with Hillary Clinton to pressure Farrow…. In summer 2017, while Farrow was trying to lock down an interview with Clinton for his foreign policy book…he received a call from Clinton’s publicist, Nick Merrill, who told him that the “big story” Farrow was working on was a “concern for us.”

In an interview with Fox News on October 16, 2019, Farrow gave more details. He said that Hillary Clinton “attempted to withdraw from an interview that she had committed to for a foreign policy book that I was working on, for which I interviewed every other living secretary of state. And, before doing so, her staff raised concerns about the fact that I was working on this story about one of her most significant donors [Harvey Weinstein] — a big bundler of Hollywood money.”

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Media bias on display as they mourn resignation of Katie Hill

Can you imagine the media going to bat for a male republican who had sex with staffers in violation of House Resolution 6?

Yeah, when unicorns fly!

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Progressives/feminists now want to normalize “mustaches” for women

I can’t keep up with all the blurred lines that progressives are co-mingling between men and women these days.

Libtards are determined to merge men and women while they separately promote the celebration of being a womyn.

To tell you the truth, it’s exhausting to keep up with the gender and societal norms that progressives want to redefine.

There’s a company called “Billie” that’s a “female-first shave and body brand” that wants to make women ugly again.

Billie” is on a mission to make sure women are proud to display their “dazzling” mustaches. From a video they posted on 10/29/19:

“Newsflash: women have mustaches. We’ve been trained to hide them – wax them, bleach them, shave them – but that doesn’t make them any less real. Fuzzy and faint or dark and dazzling, they’re there. So this Movember, we’re growing out our (formerly) top secret upper lip hair. We’re matching 100% of contributions made to our Movember team, up to $50,000: https://www.mybillie.com/movember.”

I’m so OVER this victimhood that feminists perpetuate because they were born a woman: Periods BAD! The unexpected burden of pregnancy! No choice in having to shave! The shame of being feminine!

Suck it up, buttercups! Men don’t want to know about your periods or your shaving habits. They just want a pretty girl whose legs and face don’t look like their one of their buddies.

If feminists insist upon keeping the upper lip hair in order to embrace the “stache,” then expect to end up like this “womyn:”

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Slanderer Christine Blasey Ford honored with Empowerment Award

This news makes me despair for America.

When Americans’ perception of reality can be so completely and irreconcilably different, what hope is there for our country?

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford is the woman who accused then-Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her more than 30 years ago when they were both teenagers.

Ford’s allegations and testimony at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on September 27, 2018 were ripped apart by prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, the Nominations Investigative Counsel who cross-examined Ford and Kavanaugh during the hearing.

Three days after the hearing, Mitchell submitted her legal analysis of Ford’s allegations in a 10-page Memorandum, which began with this statement:

A “he said, she said” case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.

Mitchell then elaborated on the reasons why Ford’s accusations are not believable (for a more detailed description of the Memorandum, see “Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell rips apart Christine Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh”):

  1. Ford gave inconsistent accounts of when the alleged assault happened.
  2. Ford gave inconsistent accounts of the alleged assault.
  3. Ford could not remember key details of the night in question which could help corroborate her account, including the house in which the alleged assault took place, and how she arrived at and left the party.
  4. Ford had no corroborating witnesses. All three of the individuals she named as having attended the party denied any memory of the party.
  5. Ford was inconsistent in describing the alleged incident to her husband.
  6. Ford did not name her assailant in her marriage therapy in 2012 or in her individual therapy in 2013.
  7. Ford’s memory of more recent events was also inconsistent and hazy, including when she had taken a polygraph test about the alleged assault.
  8. Ford was inconsistent in her claims of psychological effects (anxiety, claustrophia, PTSD) from the alleged assault.

The legal definition of slander is “the oral communication of false statements that are harmful to a person’s reputation”; “an act of communication that causes someone to be shamed, ridiculed, held in contempt, lowered in the estimation of the community, or to lose employment status or earnings or otherwise suffer a damaged reputation. Slander is a subcategory of defamation.”

Being inconsistent, hazy, unsubstantiated, uncorroborated, and without evidence or witness(es), Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations against Brett Kavanaugh are wholly incredible, intended to harm his reputation and thwart his confirmation to the Supreme Court, and therefore slanderous. Despite all that, yesterday (October 30) in Santa Clara, California, the Silicon Valley YWCA honored her with their 2019 Empowerment Award.

Jesse Gary sycophantically reports for KTVU Fox 2:

Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford made her first public speaking appearance since the Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation hearings in 2018.

Rarely does an award recipient eclipse the keynote speaker. At the Silicon Valley YWCA’s annual luncheon Wednesday in Santa Clara, Doctor Christine Blasey-Ford took center stage, and the lion’s share of attention. She stepped forward to accept the non-profit’s 2019 Empowerment Award.

“It’s funny, I was inspired by Anita Hill when I was deciding whether to testify. But it didn’t occur to me at the time that I would be inspiring anyone else,” said Dr. Blasey-Ford.

In September of 2018, Blasey-Ford braved a withering attack while alleging then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in the 1980s. While Kavanaugh went on to gain confirmation to the High Court, Blasey-Ford helped lend credence to claims made by victims of sexual violence.

“I just really applaud her tremendous courage and continuing to come out and be firm in her message,” said luncheon attendee Tonie Hansen.

Blasey-Ford’s remarks lasted just a few minutes, but had the 1,400 guests in attendance captivated. While she blazed a trail through Washington’s power-elite, the keynote speaker blazed a trail that helped change the country.

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military vet!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

New book on Kavanaugh by NYT reporters bombs

Do you remember that new book on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh which made new sexual assault charges, but were almost immediately debunked when friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the attack?

The book, The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation, is co-authored by two New York Times reporters, Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly. Published by Portfolio on Sept. 17, 2019, the book was immediately panned by critics, and sales of the book have crashed.

Ha, ha, ha, ha!

Paul Bedard reports for the Washington Examiner, Oct. 4, 2019, that although the book was expected to sell at least 10,000-12,000 in the first two weeks, thereby propelling it onto the New York Times’ bestseller hardcover list, it has sold about a third of that in the first two weeks — which means 3,300 to 4,000 copies.

According to a publishing source’s latest BookScan numbers, which account for about 80% of sales, The Education of Brett Kavanaugh‘s number is 3,120. The source said: “If you add in ebooks — they may have sold a total of 4,000. That’s one of the most epic bombs in political publishing over the past decade.

Another publishing source who has handled several Washington-related nonfiction works said the pushback by conservatives and supporters of President Trump and Kavanaugh was harsh and hurt sales.

By comparison, another Kavanaugh book,Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court, which details the Democratic war on the Trump nominee, has sold 60,000 books and a total of 100,000 copies since its debut on July 9, 2019. It was written by Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino and published by Regnery.

As of today, Amazon ranks The Education of Brett Kavanaugh #9,041. The average rating by 47 customers is 3.2 out of 5.

Below are some of the reviews that gave the book a one-star rating:

“I did not vote for Trump in 2016, and as an independent I am far more interested in factual truth than which party “wins.” … This book is very disappointing. The author’s bias is evident…. If you are looking for biased reinforcement that Kavanuagh is ‘bad’ with little concern for actual truth and facts, this book is for you.” 

Already busted for lies…nothing but an attempted SMEAR CAMPAIGN. These two women who write for the New York Times fabricated a story and hope to CASH IN. Hopefully good Americans don’t allow it and they are sued. It is nothing but a HIT PIECE…in fact they knew subject was not true and wrote it anyway. That is call LIBEL. They went about writing an investigation piece and came up empty so they tried to make it into something it wasn’t…they claim there are 7 witnesses to the penis in Ramirez’s hand, but these people do not recall or it is hearsay, or they are anonymous, or they work for the CLINTONS… PURE FANTASY COOKED UP IN THE LIBERAL BRAIN.

So far, there is no proof that Kavanaugh did any of the things he was accused of (other than drinking beer). NO PROOF. Do we want to become the country where anybody can accuse anybody of anything without witnesses or proof and destroy their career? Makes no difference whether you like him or not, whether you believe the women or not – there needs to be credible witnesses AND PROOF. If one thinks the FBI takes sides, the side they take is liberal, not conservative, and they thoroughly investigated these accusations and found NO PROOF, no credible witnesses. Remember, you might be next! This is a very slippery slope!

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran.

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Rapper Lizzo learning to love her insecurities: “I am fat, I am beautiful”

Girl, you are not fat. You are obese.

This womyn is 5’10” and weighs 250 pounds. Her BMI is 35.9 indicating her weight is in the obese category for adults of her height.

Trying to disguise her obesity as an “insecurity” or as a need for “inclusivity” does not change the realities of the physical effects of obesity.

As I said in a post last month, please pick a side. Obesity and health care costs continue to rise yet this body image is promoted as if there was no way to prevent it. All in the name of “inclusivity.”

From Yahoo: She’s famed for her upbeat anthems, but, in a new interview with CBS Sunday Morning, Lizzo admits that body-shaming remarks have taken a toll. The “Juice” singer and self-professed “band geek” — whose real name is Melissa Jefferson — tells the morning show’s Tracy Smith that receiving negative feedback is like getting a “mosquito bite.” At first it’s a minor annoyance, but over time it’s eating you alive.

“Somebody’s like, ‘Well, you know, you’re a big girl so you can never have short hair, you always have to have big hair because you’re a big girl,’” she says. “And they say that lovingly, but I’m like, that’s a little mosquito bite. You don’t even know it’s there, but soon you look up and you’re covered in mosquito bites and you’re like, ‘Oh my God, I have all of these things [scratching arms] but they were so normalized to me because they were so innocent.’

“[People] meant well but I had to peel back a lot of layers,” she adds.

While countless fans credit her and her music for making them feel empowered, the star says her own journey to self-confidence took real work.

“It’s not something you really change,” she says. “It’s something that you address and work on. I had to address every layer of insecurity. Because I can’t just be like, ‘Alright, my arm’s not jiggly and lumpy anymore’ — that’s delusional. You have to be like, ‘That’s not ugly to me anymore, and it’s not wrong to me, it’s beautiful to me.

And I think that is why I’m able to call myself fat, and people are like, ‘No!’ Even my friends. And I’m like, ‘B***h, you know I’m fat.’ I’m like, ‘Don’t say no. I am fat, I am beautiful.’

I think it’s because I learned to actually look all my insecurities in the face, call them by their name and fall in love with them.”

See also:

Calvin Klein promoting obesity under the guise of “inclusivity”
Gillette continues their quest to be “woke” by promoting obesity and transgenders
Feminists get it wrong: Study finds that normalization of plus-size fuels obesity epidemic

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Lawsuit claims Robert De Niro subjected female employee to creepy and abusive behavior

Demorats set the standard: We must believe all women. He’s guilty!

From NY Post: Robert De Niro routinely subjected his longtime employee to creepy and abusive behavior, including leaving her voicemails threatening “you’re f—ing history” and calling her a “bitch” and a “brat,” an explosive new lawsuit charges.

Graham Chase Robinson says for years she was the victim of “gratuitous unwanted physical contact” from the Oscar winner, who also hurled “sexually-charged comments to her” when she worked at his production company, Canal Productions Inc.

Robinson’s allegations against the “Taxi Driver” star are levied in a lawsuit filed Thursday in Manhattan federal court for gender discrimination and wage violations.

She said she began working for Canal Productions in 2008 as an executive assistant and “forced to resign” in April after rising to the position of vice president of production and finance.

“Robert De Niro is someone who has clung to old mores. He does not accept the idea that men should treat women as equals,” the suit says. “He does not care that gender discrimination in the workplace violates the law. Ms. Robinson is a casualty of this attitude.”

She claims De Niro treated her as his “office wife” and made her do “stereotypically female duties, like housework” while underpaying her and denying her overtime.

The actor also allegedly “urinated during telephone calls” with Robinson and would greet her wearing only his “pajamas or a bathrobe,” the suit says.

“Among other things, De Niro would direct Ms. Robinson to scratch his back, button his ties and prod him awake when he was in bed,” the complaint adds. “De Niro also stood idly by while his friend slapped Ms. Robinson on her buttocks.”

Robinson said she had to endure De Niro’s jokes about his Viagra prescription and that he directed her to “imagine him on the toilet.”

”De Niro suggested that Ms. Robinson could get pregnant using sperm from her (married) male co-worker,” the suit adds.

The suit also contains a link to a recording of a scathing voicemail De Niro allegedly left Robinson when she didn’t pick up his call. “You f—ing don’t answer my calls? How dare you! You’re about to be fired. You’re f–king history,” he seethes.

De Niro and his production company sued Robinson for $6 million in August, accusing her of swiping cash and frequent flyer miles and abruptly quitting. But Robinson claims that suit was brought in retaliation — after she had threatened to sue the actor first.

“De Niro was enraged at the prospect of Ms. Robinson bringing a lawsuit challenging his behavior,” Robinson’s complaint says. “So, he retaliated and struck first.”

Robinson claims she long contemplated quitting but that De Niro would lord his influence as one of Hollywood’s top actors over her, telling her he’d giver her “bad recommendation” if she left, according to court papers.

Listen to De Niro’s voicemail message to Robinson here.

This would not shock me that this woman’s claim is true. De Niro has a history of abusive language and behavior:

TDS-infected Robert De Niro screams at his driver because he went to the wrong spot
TDS: Robert De Niro and his foul mouth bash President Trump during award ceremony for high school students
Actor Robert De Niro threatens violence against Trump

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0