Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!
Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!
Parents magazine is published by the Meredith Corporation and, according to their Wikipedia page, features “scientific” information on child development geared to help parents in raising their children.
That is a complete lie. What they are really featuring is complete leftist LGTBQRSTUV propaganda.
Last week the magazine posted the above picture to Instagram saying the following: “I told him [Eli, the kid in the picture] that SOME women, SOME non binary people and SOME men have periods. It was easy for him to accept as he hadn’t had to unlearn the engrained societal norm but if a 4 year old can grasp it I’m sure most of us can have a crack at unlearning transphobic/misinformed norms and open our minds… ya think?”
Fortunately the majority of comments do no support this progressive madness.
Hopefully this boy will receive a proper education. Yet I’m not holding my breath that the reality of biology will be entertained in his home.
Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!
Ever since the #MeToo movement started, we’ve been told by democats that we must #BelieveWomen.
Yet when it comes to telling womens’ stories of abuse and harassment, the media and progressives do everything they can to bury the stories to protect their friends in high places.
Apparently it’s only acceptable to #BelieveWomen when they accuse republican men (even with scant-to-no proof).
NBC killed Ronan Farrow’s expose on Harvey Weinstein in their desire to protect predators.
ABC News spiked a story exposing the truth behind pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Obviously, the above two stories have a certain power couple connection – the Clintons. Funny how the two alphabets killed these stories at the time Hillary Clinton was running for president. Just a coincidence, I guess.
Now comes word that Nike is apparently victim-shaming a women runner who claims that Nike’s former trainer, Alberto Salazar , put her through physical and mental abuse.
The NY Post reports that athlete Mary Cain, while working with Salazar on Nike’s Oregon Project, the coach forced her to lose weight and ignored her acts of self-harm. Just 17 at the time, Cain describes scenes where Salazar would weigh her in front of her teammates and publicly shame her if she wasn’t hitting her weight.
Nike cut ties with Salazar this year after he was banned for 4 years from athletics for doping offenses.
Nike says they will launch an investigation and from their statement: “These are deeply troubling allegations which have not been raised by Mary or her parents before. Mary was seeking to rejoin the Oregon Project and Alberto’s team as recently as April of this year and had not raised these concerns as part of that process.”
The NY Post says that other women are backing Cain’s claims. From their report:
“Multiple prominent runners, including New York City Marathon winner Shalane Flanagan, have spoken out in support of Cain. Olympic runner Kara Goucher backed up Cain’s allegations and criticized Nike’s handling of the situation on Twitter Friday.
“So [Nike] responds to [Cain],” Goucher wrote. “Takes the time to victim shame Mary, before saying they will investigate. I hope you come to me, because I have stories to match all of Mary’s claims and so much more. Don’t let this be more lip service, actually do something.”
Read the whole NY Post story here.
As a result of this scandal, Nike CEO Mark Parker is stepping down to become executive chairman of the company on January 13, 2020. He endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in 2016.
Just another example of progressives’ and their double standards: They claim to care about women yet put politics, power and profits over the truth and well-being of women.
In the wake of Hillary Clinton’s election failure, in spite of DNC vote fraud and a complicit lying news media, the tech giants realized that a significant factor in Donald Trump’s success was “alternative” online media. They decided on a comprehensive effort to take down conservative communication.
FOTM was forced to move to new hosting servers, and with the help of some significant IT experts, continued to publish new posts.
With one year before the 2020 presidential election, it is likely the enemies of the Constitution will become more rash in their tactics.
Let’s buckle up for some turbulence, and commit our way to the Lord.
Reddit employs people to be Administrators(admins). Each subreddit is ran by moderators(mods). Mods police their subreddit and try remove any content that might be a violation of Reddit’s rules. Mods are just volunteers. They are not paid. Some of Reddit admins exploit and extort the mods.
Registration of certain organizations
Reddit received $300 million from Tencent holdings. Tencent has many ties to the Chinese government. One very obvious one is the the Independent Non-Executive Director of Tencent, Siu Shun Yang. Yang is a Member of the 12th National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference(CPPCC). The CPPCC is an organization in the patriotic united front of the Chinese people, an important organ for multiparty cooperation and political consultation under the leadership of the Communist Party of China (CPC), and an important means of promoting socialist democracy in China’s political activities.
Here are additional links that provide more information about Tencent and China’s relationship.
Because of Tencent’s connection to the Chinese government and it’s huge investment in Reddit. Reddit is “subject to foreign control” Reddit should have registered with the Attorney General. This is defined in U.S. Code Title 18. CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Part I. CRIMES Chapter 115. TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES Section 2386. Registration of certain organizations.
I’ve provide a copy of Section 2386 below.
U.S. Code § 2386.Registration of certain organizations
“Organization” means any group, club, league, society, committee, association, political party, or combination of individuals, whether incorporated or otherwise, but such term shall not include any corporation, association, community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes;
“Political activity” means any activity the purpose or aim of which, or one of the purposes or aims of which, is the control by force or overthrow of the Government of the United States or a political subdivision thereof, or any State or political subdivision thereof;
An organization is engaged in “civilian military activity” if:
(1) it gives instruction to, or prescribes instruction for, its members in the use of firearms or other weapons or any substitute therefor, or military or naval science; or
(2) it receives from any other organization or from any individual instruction in military or naval science; or
(3) it engages in any military or naval maneuvers or activities; or
(4) it engages, either with or without arms, in drills or parades of a military or naval character; or
(5) it engages in any other form of organized activity which in the opinion of the Attorney General constitutes preparation for military action;
An organization is “subject to foreign control” if:
(a) it solicits or accepts financial contributions, loans, or support of any kind, directly or indirectly, from, or is affiliated directly or indirectly with, a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, or an agent, agency, or instrumentality of a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, or a political party in a foreign country, or an international political organization; or
(b) its policies, or any of them, are determined by or at the suggestion of, or in collaboration with, a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, or an agent, agency, or instrumentality of a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, or a political party in a foreign country, or an international political organization.
Every organization subject to foreign control which engages in civilian military activity; and
Every organization, the purpose or aim of which, or one of the purposes or aims of which, is the establishment, control, conduct, seizure, or overthrow of a government or subdivision thereof by the use of force, violence, military measures, or threats of any one or more of the foregoing.
Every such organization shall register by filing with the Attorney General, on such forms and in such detail as the Attorney General may by rules and regulations prescribe, a registration statement containing the information and documents prescribed in subsection (B)(3) and shall within thirty days after the expiration of each period of six months succeeding the filing of such registration statement, file with the Attorney General, on such forms and in such detail as the Attorney General may by rules and regulations prescribe, a supplemental statement containing such information and documents as may be necessary to make the information and documents previously filed under this section accurate and current with respect to such preceding six months’ period. Every statement required to be filed by this section shall be subscribed, under oath, by all of the officers of the organization.
(a) The armed forces of the United States; or
(c) Any law-enforcement agency of the United States or of any Territory, District or possession thereof, or of any State or political subdivision of a State, or of any agency or instrumentality of one or more States; or
(d) Any duly established diplomatic mission or consular office of a foreign government which is so recognized by the Department of State; or
(b) The name, address, and nationality of each officer, and of each person who performs the functions of an officer, of the organization, and of each branch, chapter, and affiliate of the organization;
(c) The qualifications for membership in the organization;
(d) The existing and proposed aims and purposes of the organization, and all the means by which these aims or purposes are being attained or are to be attained;
(g) A detailed statement of the assets of the organization, and of each branch, chapter, and affiliate of the organization, the manner in which such assets were acquired, and a detailed statement of the liabilities and income of the organization and of each branch, chapter, and affiliate of the organization;
(i) A description of the uniforms, badges, insignia, or other means of identification prescribed by the organization, and worn or carried by its officers or members, or any of such officers or members;
(j) A copy of each book, pamphlet, leaflet, or other publication or item of written, printed, or graphic matter issued or distributed directly or indirectly by the organization, or by any chapter, branch, or affiliate of the organization, or by any of the members of the organization under its authority or within its knowledge, together with the name of its author or authors and the name and address of the publisher;
(l) In case the organization is subject to foreign control, the manner in which it is so subject;
(m) A copy of the charter, articles of association, constitution, bylaws, rules, regulations, agreements, resolutions, and all other instruments relating to the organization, powers, and purposes of the organization and to the powers of the officers of the organization and of each chapter, branch, and affiliate of the organization; and
(n) Such other information and documents pertinent to the purposes of this section as the Attorney General may from time to time require.
All statements filed under this section shall be public records and open to public examination and inspection at all reasonable hours under such rules and regulations as the Attorney General may prescribe.
(C) The Attorney General is authorized at any time to make, amend, and rescind such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section, including rules and regulations governing the statements required to be filed.
(D) Whoever violates any of the provisions of this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Whoever in a statement filed pursuant to this section willfully makes any false statement or willfully omits to state any fact which is required to be stated, or which is necessary to make the statements made not misleading, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Reddit’s election related crimes
Now that’s it’s understood that Tencent is a co-owner of Reddit and that Reddit subject to foreign control. It should also be noted that the change in Reddit’s ownership status from being a domestically owned company to a foreign and domestically owned company also places more restrictions on Reddit in matters involving elections in the USA. The Federal Elections Commission regulations prohibit foreign nationals from directing, dictating, controlling, or directly or indirectly participating in the decision-making process of any person (such as a corporation, labor organization, political committee, or political organization) with regard to any election-related activities.
Reddit’s “Ask me anything”(AMA) events that host candidates participating in elections in the U.S.A. caught my attention. Reddit may not be part of any of the candidates campaigns but, If during election season a candidate attends a event where they are the key speaker and discuss and answer questions that are related to their campaign. it would be considered a “campaign event”. Every AMA that occurred and featured a candidate that is actively running for office after Reddit accepted Tencent Holdings $300 million has been a violation of our election laws.
Foreign national as campaign volunteer
Although he or she may not make contributions or expenditures (including advances of personal funds), an individual who is a foreign national may participate in campaign activities as an uncompensated volunteer. In doing so, the volunteer must be careful not to participate in the decision-making process of the campaign. The Federal Election Campaign Act (the Act) and Commission regulations specifically prohibit foreign nationals from participating in the decisions of any person involving election-related activity. For example, a foreign national volunteer may attend committee events and campaign strategy meetings, but may not be involved in the management of the committee.
The following groups and individuals are considered “foreign nationals” and are subject to the prohibition:
- Foreign citizens (not including dual citizens of the United States);
- Immigrants who are not lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
- Foreign governments;
- Foreign political parties;
- Foreign corporations;
- Foreign associations;
- Foreign partnerships; and
- Any other foreign principal, as defined at 22 U.S.C. § 611(b), which includes a foreign organization or “other combination of persons organized under the laws of or having its principal place of business in a foreign country.
How did Reddit violate election laws? Reddit falls under “foreign national”. The following would fall under prohibited behavior by foreign nationals related to campaign funding and campaign events.
Reddit and it’s admin’s have full control the AMA’s. They control all context of the event. They decide what comments, submissions or questions that are acceptable. They have their rules people have to abide by. They have the ability to remove anything they want.
What should Reddit have done different?
It’s one thing to host an event. It’s a different thing when they administer and moderate the event. That’s their crime, administrating and moderating the events. What they should have done was host the event and let the speaker and campaign administer and moderate the details, comments, questions and rules.
Having foreign investors really isn’t what changes things for Reddit. It’s the amount in dollars that changes things. You don’t receive a 300 million dollars and tell the investor “now go away, we got this”. The investor is going to want to part of how that money is spent.
Reddit has committed election crimes and will continue breaking the law until the Federal Election Commission(FEC) steps in and shuts them down.
Reddit is a propaganda generating, fascist left website. It is perhaps the most hateful, bigoted, racist website on the internet. This is not because of it’s users. Most of the negativity, hate, election crime activity comes from Reddit admins. They are the promoters and pushers. Reddit needs quit being so political. They have double standards when it comes to enforcing their rules. Often users receive a harsher punishment for rule violations if they are conservatives. Punishment decisions based on persons political preference is ……lame.
If they continue this behavior It’s entirely possible that they will do one or all of the following: implode, lose every penny in lawsuits or end up in prison. What more can you expect from the armpit of the internet.
*Foreign nationals, companies, governments have been influencing our elections for years. The path they take is by making large investments in American companies, like Reddit. Also, they may buy or open a subsidiary company based in the U.S.A.. There’s more they have to do. These are 2 examples This is where more focus should directed when looking for foreign influence….Investment Election Influence. DP
*I would also spend some time looking at politicians and upper level government employees with duel citizenship. DP.
*Reddit is jam packed with shady behavior. Definitely needs some attention from some badge packing 3 letter agency of the United States government.
With all that being said. I have to explain to myself why I still visit Reddit, almost daily, during the slow times of the year.
*Foreign influence in our elections unfortunate reality. So much so that a person can spend a lifetime writing about it. It’s almost to the point to where it is easier to find than not finding it. I barely scratched the surface of the problem. I mention a couple a couple of key points. Fact checked but included a couple person comments that are obvious. Please share your thoughts in the comments. “
Respectfully, Deplorable Patriot
“ There are thousands of individuals that volunteer their time to help make the world a better place to live. They don’t want money, fame or power. They won’t sell you a tee shirt or a book about Qanon. They don’t want your “likes or follows” Anons only want to leave a world behind that’s a little bit better than when they arrived here. These are the true heroes of modern times.”
“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” –Isaiah 5:20
It is a biological FACT that only biological females can conceive and bear children.
But in the upside-down world of the Left, to say that is anathema.
Stephen Adams reports for the Daily Mail, November 2, 2019, that a birth coach in the UK named Lynsey McCarthy-Calvert, 45, is ostracized by Doula UK, a national organization for birth coaches, after “transgender” activists took offense at her saying in a Facebook post that only women can have babies.
Note: A doula is an individual, usually a woman, who is not medically trained but who gives help and support to a woman during pregnancy and during and after child birth.
What triggered the trannies was a Facebook post by McCarthy-Calvert containing a photograph of a negligee-clad woman somersaulting underwater, and these words:
“I am not a ‘cervix owner’ I am not a ‘menstruator’ I am not a ‘feeling’. I am not defined by wearing a dress and lipstick. I am a woman: an adult human female.
Women birth all the people, make up half the population, but less than a third of the seats in the House of Commons are occupied by us.”
McCarthy-Calvert continued, saying that women are accused of transphobia more than men — that men are not “subjected to cries of bigotry and transphobia when they say they don’t want to have sex with a woman with a penis”. McCarthy-Calvert also pointed out that most so-called transgender women have not had their male genitalia removed.
A Facebook follower accused her of using “absolutely disgusting language” and that “you seem to be forgetting that not only women birth children.”
Days later, around 20 transgender activists wrote a letter of complaint to Doula UK, claiming McCarthy-Calvert’s Facebook post contained several “trans exclusionary comments” including the description of a woman as an “adult human female”. In so doing, McCarthy-Calvert had “clearly” breached Doula UK’s policies that members “shouldn’t post anything that our colleagues, clients and affiliates would find offensive”.
Doula UK immediately withdrew McCarthy-Calvert as their spokeswoman, and launched a four-month investigation. In March, the organization’s board of directors concluded that McCarthy-Calvert’s Facebook post “does breach Doula UK’s guidelines” on equality and diversity. Doula UK threatened to suspend McCarthy-Calvert, a mother-of-four who had been a doula for six years, unless she deleted her post.
McCarthy-Calvert resigned from the organization altogether. She said:
“I am angry and sad. I was effectively ostracised for saying I am a woman and so are my clients. I have been very disappointed by Doula UK’s response. The leadership are paralysed by not wanting to upset transgender rights activists. They have fallen over themselves to acquiesce to their demands.”
Doula UK denies it had “acquiesced” to activists or that McCarthy-Calvert had been “in some way driven out of the organisation.” Its spokesperson said: “We are proud to say that we seek to listen to the lived experience of marginalised groups and make changes – including changes to the language we use – if we believe it is necessary to make the Doula UK community more welcoming and supportive.”
Daily Mail points out that the hounding of McCarthy-Calvert is the latest in a series of recent “victories” for transgender activists:
The Daily Wire observes:
The UK is ground zero for internecine LGBT warfare over precisely this issue, and the chasm between trans activists and more traditional leftists seems to be growing wider, particularly the division between women’s rights activists and “trans-exclusionary radical feminists” [TERFs] who claim to want to preserve the gains they’ve won for women by ensuring the gender binary doesn’t go by the wayside.
TERFs have come under heavy fire for their views in the progressive UK and in Canada, where a recent panel, featuring a TERF, was widely protested and the panelist regularly compared to a Nazi.
Kyle Kulinski is the co-founder of Justice Democrats and in his Twitter bio he describes himself as a “Populist Left.”
From his Wiki page:
“Kyle Edward Kulinski (born January 31, 1988) is an American political commentator, and the co-founder of Justice Democrats. He is the host and producer of The Kyle Kulinski Show on his channel Secular Talk, an affiliate of The Young Turks network. He is a social democrat, and a registered Democrat in New York state.”
He tweeted this out on Saturday: “This is land by the Colorado, Kansas border from a plane. Pretty cool. I have no idea how/ why it looks like this.”
Here’s the picture that accompanied that tweet:
He replied to someone: “I never fly & I think variation of color in the picture is beautiful. Sorry my wonderment isn’t sufficiently cultured or edgy.”
More proof that progressives have no idea of what goes on in this country outside of their own little urban bubbles.
Read some of the funny replies to his tweet here.
I can’t keep up with all the blurred lines that progressives are co-mingling between men and women these days.
Libtards are determined to merge men and women while they separately promote the celebration of being a womyn.
To tell you the truth, it’s exhausting to keep up with the gender and societal norms that progressives want to redefine.
There’s a company called “Billie” that’s a “female-first shave and body brand” that wants to make women ugly again.
“Billie” is on a mission to make sure women are proud to display their “dazzling” mustaches. From a video they posted on 10/29/19:
“Newsflash: women have mustaches. We’ve been trained to hide them – wax them, bleach them, shave them – but that doesn’t make them any less real. Fuzzy and faint or dark and dazzling, they’re there. So this Movember, we’re growing out our (formerly) top secret upper lip hair. We’re matching 100% of contributions made to our Movember team, up to $50,000: https://www.mybillie.com/movember.”
I’m so OVER this victimhood that feminists perpetuate because they were born a woman: Periods BAD! The unexpected burden of pregnancy! No choice in having to shave! The shame of being feminine!
Suck it up, buttercups! Men don’t want to know about your periods or your shaving habits. They just want a pretty girl whose legs and face don’t look like their one of their buddies.
If feminists insist upon keeping the upper lip hair in order to embrace the “stache,” then expect to end up like this “womyn:”
After it was announced that a K-9 military dog played a major role in the Special Ops raid and takedown of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, President Trump tweeted an obviously Photoshopped pic that Daily Wire created (above).
Because progressives are seriously infected with TDS and have no sense of humor, the media immediately began their investigation into President Trump’s horribly “fake” tweet. Firefighters to the rescue!
Jim Acosta at CNN made sure to let everyone know that “the dog is not at the WH.”
The New York Times went to bat to request details from the WH on the photo.
Because OrangeManBad, the
DNC media tried their hardest to smear President Trump and his dastardly meme. Impeach NOW!
Ben Shapiro, from the Daily Wire, shared these tweets last night:
“So, WaPo asked my business partner, @jeremydboreing, about our Medal of Honor dog meme. His glorious response is screencapped below. Their report then suggested Jeremy refused to answer questions about the picture. Um, no. We just think you’re being f***ing insane.”
“Yes, we created the meme. Yes, it is a joke. Yes, you people are also jokes. Please feel free to quote both me and Jeremy on this.”
I can’t imagine how much crazier the left can get if President Trump wins re-election.
Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter and self-appointed censor of free political speech, announced on the eve of Satan’s holiday that ALL political advertising on Twitter is now banned.
In addition, the ban extends t0 election advertising and political issues. Think anti-abortion, pro second amendment, and global climate change skeptics. In addition, it does not take an Einstein to figure out that this policy is aimed directly at President Trump, who uses Twitter to inform citizens of important issues that Twitter and the rest of the left wing, libtard, socialist/communist media cabal ignore.
From: The Guardian-US Edition
by Julia Carrie Wong in San Francisco
Wed 30 Oct 2019 18.19 EDT
First published on Wed 30 Oct 2019 16.05 EDT
Twitter will ban all political advertising, the company’s CEO has announced, in a move that will increase pressure on Facebook over its controversial stance to allow politicians to advertise false statements.
The new policy, announced via Jack Dorsey’s Twitter account on Wednesday, will come into effect on 22 November and will apply globally to all electioneering ads, as well as ads related to political issues. The timing means the ban will be in place in time for the UK snap election.
We’ve made the decision to stop all political advertising on Twitter globally. We believe political message reach should be earned, not bought. Why? A few reasons…🧵
4:05 PM – Oct 30, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
111K people are talking about this
Twitter had previously implemented rules and restrictions for political advertising.
The announcement comes as Facebook is embroiled in a controversy over its decision to exempt ads by politicians from third-party fact checking and from a policy that bans false statements from paid advertisements. Dorsey explained the motivations behind the change in a lengthy Twitter thread that appeared to include several references and responses to the convoluted arguments that Facebook has put forward in recent weeks.
The organic spread of political messages online “should not be compromised by money”, he wrote. The advanced state of digital advertising technology, including “machine learning-based optimization of messaging and micro-targeting” and deepfakes – fake or manipulated videos that appear real – combined with the pollution of the online information ecosystem with misinformation, “present entirely new challenges to civic discourse”.
“This isn’t about free expression,” he added, in a seeming riposte to the Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s recent defense of online political advertising in a speech billed as a “stand for voice and free expression”. “This is about paying for reach. And paying to increase the reach of political speech has significant ramifications that today’s democratic infrastructure may not be prepared to handle. It’s worth stepping back in order to address.”
Dorsey tweeted another counter-argument to Facebook with an accompanying winking emoji, writing: “It’s not credible for us to say: ‘We’re working hard to stop people from gaming our systems to spread misleading info, but if someone pays us to target and force people to see their political ad…well…they can say whatever they want!’”
Replying to @jack
For instance, it‘s not credible for us to say: “We’re working hard to stop people from gaming our systems to spread misleading info, buuut if someone pays us to target and force people to see their political ad…well…they can say whatever they want! 😉”
4:05 PM – Oct 30, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
7,398 people are talking about this
That argument appears to mock Facebook’s recent attempts to justify its decisions to exempt posts by politicians from its third-party factchecking program, and ads by politicians from a policy that bans false statements from paid advertisements.
Together, the policies have created a situation in which Facebook is simultaneously asserting its commitment to reducing misinformation while allowing incumbent politicians and political candidates to lie in paid campaign ads.
Dorsey called for “forward-looking political ad regulation”, noting that transparency requirements that have been proposed by US lawmakers are “progress but not enough.”
“The internet provides entirely new capabilities, and regulators need to think past the present day to ensure a level playing field,” he said.
Trump’s campaign manager, Brad Parscale, called Twitter’s decision “another attempt by the left to silence Trump and conservatives” while Hillary Clinton called it “the right thing to do for democracy in America and all over the world” and the New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez deemed it “a good call”.
Daniel Kreiss, an associate professor of journalism and media at the University of North Carolina, argued that companies should focus on restricting the use of personal data in ad targeting rather than banning all political ads, which he said “favors incumbents and media appointed elites vis-a-vis challengers”.
J Nathan Matias, an assistant professor of communication at Cornell University, said that the ban could have a number of unintended consequences, including pushing campaigns to use more bots and “hybrid human-software coordination on Twitter”.
“It’s very hard to define ‘political’ things from non-political discourse,” he added. “If their policies are too loose or their enforcement too clumsy, Twitter could do real damage to public health, the uptake of government services and civic life.”
Founded 12-23-2009. Burned down by WordPress 8-15-2018 with 63M hits. Resurrected 8-23-2018. DDOS attacks began 11-10-2018. Massive Spam attacks on 12-3-2018.