Category Archives: Media

#Basta! What a difference two years makes…

Shot:

Chaser:

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Pro-life actress Patricia Heaton would rather keep her Hollyweird bucks than take a stand?

Patricia Heaton is an actress best known for playing the wife on Everybody Loves Raymond. She is worth $40 million. Her husband is an English producer/director who is overseeing her latest TV show on CBS, Carol’s Second Act.

She is supportive of pro-life groups yet not enough to actually cast a vote against pro-aborts. She tweeted the following on February 12:

Funny how she uses her voice for the innocent yet can’t speak for them at the ballot box. It’s as if she’s saying she cares so much about how the democats are killing innocent babies yet not enough to vote to stop it because she’s not a Trump supporter. Or maybe she cares more about keeping her Hollywood career alive?

I used to be impressed with her taking a stand in Hollyweird that goes against their pro-abort agenda. Now, not so much…

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Reporter asks Jim Carrey what’s on his bucket list; he tells her “just you”

This TDS-infected creep is certifiable.

See also:

What happened to #LoveTrumpsHate? Jim Carrey tweets drawing depicting Alabama governor being aborted
Jim Carrey’s latest art depicts Trump supporters having devolved into apes

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Not endearing: Seattle activist sings her protest at council meeting

This is your typical Seattle-area progressive.

Watch her whole performance here.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Unhinged demorats: Woman punches man at his birthday party after mistaking his hat as a MAGA hat

Daniel Sprague Facebook Photo

From NY Post: A retired NYPD detective says a woman punched him in the face in Nashville over the weekend because his hat looked like a MAGA cap.

Staten Island resident Daniel Sprague told the Post he was celebrating his 50th birthday with his wife and friends at The Stage on Broadway on Friday when he was assaulted by a woman he didn’t know. “I was outside with my friends when some grabbed me from behind, spun me around and punched me in the face,” said Sprague, who retired from the NYPD in 2009.“At first I thought it was a friend until I got hit. I couldn’t believe someone could get that upset.”

In reality, his cap was emblazoned with the words “Make Fifty Great Again” — while his shirt was decorated with an American flag that read “Making America Great Since 1970.”

The bar’s bouncers booted them both from the property before he had a chance to call cops, but he filed a report the following day, he said.

“All night people were giving me thumbs up, smiles or some showing rage, until they walked up close and saw what hat said,” he recalled. “Then they would wish me a happy birthday.”

He was baffled by the vitriol and said he showed respect for politicians he didn’t like. “I love Trump, but I wouldn’t hit someone who had a Bernie hat on,” said Sprague, who spent more than two decades on the NYPD and retired as a member of the elite Emergency Service Unit. “Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I wasn’t an Obama fan but if he walked into a place where I was, I would show him and the office respect.”

The Metropolitan Nashville Police Department confirmed that they took a report on the incident. “Suspect grabbed his hat from his head and punched him in the face,” according to the report. “He stated that when the suspect hit him in the face, he did not hit her back.”

Sprague recounted the incident on Facebook and said that he was waiting to hear back from detectives.

He also instructed readers not to react to negative comments on the post, because it might be one of his friends “breaking my chops because we have a great relationship and sense of humor.

“If it happens to be a fool or misguided snow flake’s comment, by arguing with them it will only encourage them to believe they know what they are talking about,” he wrote.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Another Hollyweird Hypcrite: Natalie Portman laments snubbed female directors as her own production company features just one female director — herself

Well, well, well…what do you know, we have another Hollyweird hypocrite!

Natalia Portman/Photo from Page Six

At the Oscars Sunday night, actress Natalie Portman made a “bold statement” about the snubbed female directors by wearing a cape that included all their names. Bold, indeed.

Portman wanted to recognize the women who were snubbed for their incredible work this year in her own “subtle” way. Subtle, indeed.

Even more subtle? Having your own production company that has only hired ONE female director: YOURSELF.

From Insider (via Yahoo): Natalie Portman wore a custom Dior gown complete with a cape to the Oscars on Sunday, with the cape featuring the names of female directors who weren’t nominated for the best director Oscar.

However, Portman has come under fire with some people calling the Oscar-winner a hypocrite.

Twitter user OhMyMithrandir pointed out that Portman’s production company, handsomecharliefilms, has only ever hired one female director — Portman herself.

While there a total of eight films to date (with three more announced), the handsomecharliefilms has never hired a female director other than Portman.

Read the whole story here and see a list of Portman’s production company films here.

You’d think that Portman would hire other women directors in order to give them an opportunity to have their work recognized. Apparently her production company has a bias in only hiring men directors and, of course, herself.

Typical Hollyweird hypocrite.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA: Oscars Hit All-Time Low

They might have done better had they let Gervais host:

From Yahoo: In the latest TV ratings, ABC’s broadcast of the 2020 Oscars averaged 23.6 million total viewers and a 5.3 demo rating, down 20 and 30 percent from last year’s first host-less outing.

This year’s Academy Awards thus hit new lows in both measures, lagging behind the previous “record holder” — the 2018 Oscars hosted by Jimmy Kimmel.

The Oscars outdrew both this award season’s Grammys (which were steady-ish with 18.7 million viewers) and the Golden Globes (which dipped to 18.3 million viewers), making it TV’s most-watched entertainment special in a year (since the previous Oscars), though the Grammys edged out the Oscars in the coveted 18-49 demo (having scored a 5.4 rating).

Last year’s host-less Oscars delivered 29.6 million total viewers and a 7.7 demo rating in Nielsen finals.

Read the whole story here.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

How low will Democrats go?

It should be common knowledge by now that the Democrats have control of California,  People should understand that they do not plan on losing that control.  So they spend most of their time creating an environment that secures their needs while ignoring the needs of Californians.

In the past I have mentioned 2 ways the Democrats have “tweaked” election related laws/rules in California.  One was a change in Ballot harvesting which allowed   persons other than family members to collect and submit ballots.  The second changed how they verified votes that came in the mail after the polls have closed.

These changes only made it easier for people to commit voter fraud.   They had to have known this.  The only logical explanation is they did this because they were planning to exploit the new weaknesses they had just created, by making those two changes. Because of these changes, no election result  in California  should trusted.

Fast forward to today. While reading my mail I made a discovery.   It seems that the democrats have another trick up their sleeve.  This one being so shady that it cannot possibly be legal.

California Presidential Primary election is on Tuesday, March 3, 2020.  In the image is page 7 from the Official Voter Information Guide.  (The Guide is  what the state of California mails out to Californians).  At the top of the page  you will see in bold letters “How to vote for President”.  Below that it reads “Registered to vote as No Party Preference?”.   The next paragraph is problem.

“As a voter registered with No Party Preference, if you want to vote for U.S. President, you must request a primary ballot with presidential candidates from one of the following parties:”

  • American Independent Party
  • Democratic Party
  • Libertarian Party

 

CAELEC

Where it says “you must” is the problem.  Must can be defined as to be obliged to, have to, need to, required to, etc. It’s pretty obvious that this statement is telling people  registered with no party preference that they can only vote for one of those 3 choices.  This is a complete lie.  This state government lying to voters.   They are intentionally misleading voters.  It’s the same at the Secretary of States office.  Here is a link to view their version(same as this).  Click here

This is the same document that the media and various websites are promoting in California.  This is a huge problem.

California has almost 5,700,000 voters registered as No Party Preference.  That’s because of the states push to get people to register to vote.  Now we see why.  The get them signed up then lie to them by telling them they have only three choices.  Notice that Trump isn’t included in those choices.  Notice the Republican party is not one of those three choices.

voter

The truth is that those are not their only choices.  They can vote for Trump.  They just need to register as a republican to vote for him in the primaries.  That’s just for the primaries.    For the general election, they can stay registered as no party preference.  So you see, telling people that if they want to vote for president, “they must” pick one of the three is a complete lie.

At the bottom of the page you will see where they clean it up by saying that you have to register with one of the other parties if you want to vote for their candidate.  They conveniently left out the deadline date which is,  February 18, 2020.

I’ve also provided a page from a county voter guide.  You will notice that they changed the word “must” to “can”.  Plus they included the deadline.

stancountyinfo guide

It does not matter what it says about registering with another party at the lower part of the page.  The top where it says “must” has the biggest impact on people.  They intentionally lied.  The local media is promoting that lie. The damage is done.

I’ve always said the impeachment was a distraction and people should pay attention to what the democrats are doing in the background.  This is a good example.  The democrats are being shady.  That’s all the democrats do.

No election should be trusted in the hands of a democrat.  Nothing should be trusted in the hands of a democrat.  Anybody that lives in a state controlled by democrats should check their voter info guides.  Keep a close eye on the democrats in general.

Respectfully

Deplorable Patriot

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

Visual proof: Obese singer Lizzo wears bikini during vacation in Brazil

Need more proof that Jillian Michaels was correct about singer Lizzo and her weight?

Here it is (NSFW):

This womyn is 31 years old. She is 5’10” and weighs 264 pounds. According to the CDC BMI calculator, Lizzo’s BMI is 37.9 which means she falls in the “obese” category.

Despite the health dangers of obesity, the media and pop culture continue to push Lizzo as a “body positivity” influencer.

Yuck. I see nothing positive about this body.

See also:

Rapper Lizzo learning to love her insecurities: “I am fat, I am beautiful”
Unhealthy: Elle magazine features obese rapper in order to promote “inclusivity”

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20
 

What happened to my body, my choice? Mum’s brutal housework routine sparks outrage

From MSNBC: An Australian mum of four has attracted a lot of media attention after sharing her extensive household routine which has been slammed as living in the ’50s.

Brisbane local Brooke Smith posted on the Mums Who Organise, Clean, Cook and Chat Facebook group on Monday, revealing her lengthy chore list, which can see her not going to bed until midnight.

She wakes up every morning to make her husband breakfast before he goes to work… at 4:30 am. “I always make sure I don’t go to bed until everyone’s lunches are packed, their clothes are set out for the next day including my husband’s and the house is clean”, she wrote.

“Sometimes it means I get to bed at nine sometimes that means I get to bed at midnight but I always get up early (4:30 with husband to make his breakfast and coffee),” she posted.

Then she will do her face and hair and enjoy a bit of peace and quiet before she gets her boys up 5:45 am.

Brooke ended her post with “Happy mum equals happy households do it even when you feel like not doing it because you’ll be happy for it the next day.”

She has three boys all under five, and a girl aged six.

Smith sparked debate on her post.

Some woman envied her motivation. “I think you are fantastic. I wish i was like you. Then my life would be so much easier,” commented Debbie Meier.

“You are a super mum!,” said Nicole Mcnally.

But others just didn’t agree with her lifestyle. “Wow, where is your life? Wouldn’t you rather go to bed with your hubby than be up cleaning your kitchen?” replied Porrs Renee.

“Wow, you are keen. That sounds like a scene straight out of the 50s. My husband is an adult and can find his own clothes. The kids will also learn independence if you let them do the same,” posted Cheryl Mason.

“Sorry couldn’t hear you over all the s— on my floor,” commented Catherine Savage,

Ms. Smith told news.com.au that she was not surprised her post started debate but she was annoyed people jumped to conclusions about her.

Smith’s husband works in construction and together they run a business. “But I think that if someone works hard in the sun all day and now after hours to make their business work, I think it is the least I can do and he shouldn’t be expected to come home and cook and clean,” Smith told news.co.au.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
Tweet 20
fb-share-icon20