Category Archives: Joe Biden

Creepy Joe: Sell back your assault weapons or register them with the government

Joe’s got a plan to end America’s gun violence. Funny how he and Obama couldn’t end gun violence while they were in office for eight years.

From Joe’s campaign web site:

“It’s within our grasp to end our gun violence epidemic and respect the Second Amendment, which is limited. As president, Biden will pursue constitutional, common-sense gun safety policies. Biden will:

Get weapons of war off our streets. The bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines that Biden, along with Senator Feinstein, secured in 1994 reduced the lethality of mass shootings. But, in order to secure the passage of the bans, they had to agree to a 10-year sunset provision and when the time came, the Bush Administration failed to extend them. As president, Biden will:

Ban the manufacture and sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. Federal law prevents hunters from hunting migratory game birds with more than three shells in their shotgun. That means our federal law does more to protect ducks than children. It’s wrong. Joe Biden will enact legislation to once again ban assault weapons. This time, the bans will be designed based on lessons learned from the 1994 bans. For example, the ban on assault weapons will be designed to prevent manufacturers from circumventing the law by making minor changes that don’t limit the weapon’s lethality. While working to pass this legislation, Biden will also use his executive authority to ban the importation of assault weapons.

Regulate possession of existing assault weapons under the National Firearms Act. Currently, the National Firearms Act requires individuals possessing machine-guns, silencers, and short-barreled rifles to undergo a background check and register those weapons with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Due to these requirements, such weapons are rarely used in crimes. As president, Biden will pursue legislation to regulate possession of existing assault weapons under the National Firearms Act.

Buy back the assault weapons and high-capacity magazines already in our communities. Biden will also institute a program to buy back weapons of war currently on our streets. This will give individuals who now possess assault weapons or high-capacity magazines two options: sell the weapons to the government, or register them under the National Firearms Act.

Reduce stockpiling of weapons. In order to reduce the stockpiling of firearms, Biden supports legislation restricting the number of firearms an individual may purchase per month to one.”

Read all of his gun-grabbing proposals here.

h/t Breitbart

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Admiral Mike Rogers & The Dog That Didn’t Bark

The phrase “the dog that didn’t bark” originates from a Sherlock Holmes story (“The Adventure of Silver Blaze”) – the indispensable clue coming in the form of something that would normally have occurred – but didn’t.

Which brings us to the relentless effort on the part of the Democrat Party (and its Deep State overlords) to remove President Trump from office, and thus undo the election of 2016. Since that time the Progressive forces visible to the public – the so-called mainstream media, the minions of the Democrat Party – have fed the public with allegations of “Russian collusion,” emoluments clause violations, 25th Amendment removal, and “obstruction of justice.” In spite of their all-out efforts, that poisonous Progressive tree has failed to produce impeachment fruit.

The Democrats’ motto appears to be: “if at first you don’t succeed, and second you don’t succeed, and third you don’t succeed, coup, coup, again.”

We now find ourselves being hauled out on to yet another limb of that tree – an “impeachment investigation” (a/k/a “impeachment inquiry”) borne of neither House vote nor due process – purportedly to investigate not “Russian collusion,” but “Ukrainian coercion.”

An obvious question becomes was there ever any good faith belief on the part of Democrats that President Trump had committed any bad acts, much less any serious enough to support a bona fide impeachment and removal from office?

Or has this all been an unprecedented, a downright evil attempt to remove a duly-elected President from office using trumped-up charges (pun intended) – a de facto attempt at pulling off a political coup to overthrow the rightful President of the United States?

It is submitted for your consideration that in answer to that question, “a dog that didn’t bark” provides the telltale clue.

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Nancy Pelosi’s Constitutional Process Crimes

Cross-posted from www.trevorloudon.com

“It’s a pun!” the King added in an offended tone, and everybody laughed, “Let the jury consider their verdict,” the King said, for about the twentieth time that day.

“No, no!” said the Queen. “Sentence first — verdict afterwards.”

“Stuff and nonsense!” said Alice loudly. “The idea of having the sentence first!”

“Hold your tongue!” said the Queen, turning purple.

“I won’t!” said Alice.

“Off with her head!” the Queen shouted at the top of her voice. Nobody moved.

“Who cares for you?” said Alice, (she had grown to her full size by this time.) “You’re nothing but a pack of cards!”

– Alice in Wonderland (Lewis Carroll); Chapter XII, Alice’s Evidence

We need not recount here the myriad ways that Nancy Pelosi’s so-called “impeachment investigation” is a Constitutional travesty –  perusal of the non-“mainstream” media and White House Counsel Pat Cippolone’s  letter to the House more than suffice.

The “impeachment investigation” is structured as a Congressional hit-squad, not a bona fide inquiry; it makes even Stalin’s show trials look legitimate in comparison, for at least those were held in public – something the Lavrentiy Beria-resembling Adam Schiff dares not do.

During the Mueller circus we witnessed various folks being charged with “process crimes” totally unrelated to “Russian collusion” – apparently driven by Andrew Weissmann’s attempts to squeeze (false) implicating testimony (against Trump) from the targets, or his retribution if they didn’t succumb to said attempts.

It can be argued that the lack of due process, lack of fealty to procedural precedent, and overall lack integrity, means that by design this “impeachment inquiry” is itself  a series of “process crimes” against our Constitution, committed by those who have designed it, and those who are executing it.

Further, those who are “in the know” about what’s going on, and are in a position to do something about it, or at least to blow the whistle about it, are accomplices to these “process crimes.”

After all, if the Democrats were genuine in their professed belief that impeachable offenses were committed by President Trump – yet also remained loyal to the letter and spirit of our history and our Constitution – they would be sensitive to the serious portends of even commencing such an effort.

So if this was a legitimate effort the Democrats would have made sure that the design of, and conduct of the process would be unimpeachable.

This they have not done. Quite the opposite.  This “investigation” demonstrates not only the Democrats’ duplicity, but also their desperation.

For you see, extremely serious crimes were committed against the Trump campaign; so now the Democrats and Deep State have placed themselves into a position of (as they see it) having to cover up “by any means necessary.”

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Democrat Smoke Screen

The Democrat Impeachment Effort Is A Smoke Screen

US ARMY Stryker deploying smoke screen

US ARMY Stryker deploying smoke screen

smoke screen noun

Definition of smoke screen

  1. A screen of smoke to hinder enemy observation of a military force, area, or activity
  2. Something designed to obscure, confuse, or mislead

Examples of smoke screen in a Sentence

  • His campaign promises were just a smoke screen.
  • The truth was hidden behind a smoke screen of lies.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smoke%20screen


Think of it as a means of distracting the conservatives from the real news.

And that news is the impending collapse of the Leftist Democratic house of cards. All the Democrat players are deeply interconnected. The Clintons, the Obamas, the treasonous FBI and CIA leaders, the media, led by CNN, the abortion mills, the Hollywood perverts, the satanists, the human traffickers and pedophiles, the Leftist professors, the globalists, are all tied together.

Their leaders are aware that one major take-down can lead to all of them falling, and fast. This means they are extremely dangerous. If there were ever a time to expect mass casualty false flag attacks, now is that time.

Let’s keep our eyes on the prize

Instead of focusing on the defense of the President, let’s continue to focus on any way we can lift the covers off the festering evils on the Left.

~ TD

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Clueless: Demorat voters can’t name Biden’s accomplishments

Guess we should give them a pass as Biden doesn’t have any real accomplishments…

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Friday funnies!

And the best one (courtesy of Babylon Bee):

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Joe Biden lied about his first wife being killed by a drunk driver

On December 18, 1972, a few weeks after Joe Biden won the U.S. Senate election in Delaware, his (first) wife Neilia and one-year-old daughter Naomi were killed in an automobile accident while Christmas shopping in Hockessin, Delaware. Neilia Biden’s station wagon was hit by a tractor-trailer truck as she pulled out from an intersection. Biden’s sons Beau and Hunter survived the accident in fair condition: Beau had a broken leg and other wounds; Hunter had a minor skull fracture and other head injuries.

News and law enforcement reports from the time cleared Curtis C. Dunn, the driver of the tractor-trailer, of any wrongdoing.  Investigators determined alcohol did not play a role in the crash, and the police never charged Dunn.

But that hadn’t stopped Joe Biden from lying about Dunn.

Along with the lie that he had a “blue-collar” upbringing (he actually had a decidedly upper class, albeit not rich-rich, childhood), Joe Biden had for years claimed that Neilia and their daughter were killed by a drunk driver named Curtis C. Dunn.

In 2001 and 2007 — 29 and 35 years after Neilia’s death — Biden said in public forums that the tractor-trailer driver, Curtis Dunn, had been driving under the influence. By that time, having died in 1999, Dunn could not refute Biden’s slander:

  • A few days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Biden told an audience at the University of Delaware’s Bob Carpenter Center: “It was an errant driver who stopped to drink instead of drive and hit a tractor-trailer, hit my children and my wife and killed them.”
  • On December 14, 2007, the New York Times portrayed Democratic presidential candidate and then-Senator Joe Biden (D-Delaware) as a tragic figure who “has survived so much personal and political catastrophe” and “rebuilt his life”. Biden told a crowd at the University of Iowa: “Let me tell you a little story. I got elected when I was 29, and I got elected November the 7th. And on Dec. 18 of that year, my wife and three kids were Christmas shopping for a Christmas tree. A tractor-trailer, a guy who allegedly — and I never pursued it — drank his lunch instead of eating his lunch, broadsided my family and killed my wife instantly, and killed my daughter instantly, and hospitalized my two sons, with what were thought to be at the time permanent, fundamental injuries.”

The media all repeated Joe Biden’s slander of Curtis Dunn. As examples:

  • From The Economist on August 28, 2008: “He [Joe Biden] endured an unspeakable personal tragedy, shortly after his first run for the Senate in 1972, when his wife and daughter were killed by a drunk driver.
  • Reporting for the Huffington Post on September 10, 2008, Cristina Chang wrote: “But Delaware’s Senator-elect would face a more difficult challenge soon after his election, when a drunk driver struck the car carrying his family, killing his wife Neilia and daughter Naomi and severely wounding sons Hunter and Beau.”

Ironically, it was Neilia Biden, not Curtis Dunn, who might have been at fault.

In October 2008, Dunn’s daughter, Pamela Hamill, had had enough of Joe Biden’s lies about her father. As reported by Carl Hamilton for Newark Post on Oct. 30, 2008:

Newark resident Pamela Hamill wants a public apology from vice presidential candidate U.S. Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.), who she says has repeatedly besmirched her late father, Curtis C. Dunn.

Dunn died in 1999, but his daughter says she’s fed up with Biden publicly mischaracterizing him as having been drunk when the accident occurred.

According to Delaware Superior Court Judge Jerome O. Herlihy, who oversaw the police investigation 36 years ago as chief prosecutor, there is no evidence supporting Biden’s claim. “The rumor about alcohol being involved by either party, especially the truck driver (Dunn), is incorrect,” Herlihy said recently.

Police determined that Biden’s first wife drove into the path of Dunn’s tractor-trailer, possibly because her head was turned and she didn’t see the oncoming truck.

Dunn, who overturned his rig while swerving to avoid a collision, ran to the wrecked car and was the first to render assistance.

Police filed no charges against Dunn, who at that time lived in North East, Md. with his wife, Ruby, and their seven children….

Hamill says she defended Biden at first, believing that, perhaps, his words had been misconstrued.

But her disbelief turned to anguish when shown a video of Biden making his unfounded assertion during a public appearance….

“I just burst into tears,” Hamill said. “The story already is tragic enough, why did he have to sensationalize it by saying my father was drunk? My family is outraged.” …

Hamill appeared on “Inside Edition” on Sept. 18 to set the record straight and now, acting as family spokesperson, she is campaigning for Biden to recant his story and restore her father’s honor.

On Oct. 1, after several attempts to make contact, Hamill sent a registered letter to Biden’s camp, asking him to tell the truth.

She also asked CBS officials to instruct Katie Couric to broadcast the real circumstances surrounding the fatal accident.

As of Sunday, Hamill hadn’t heard from Biden’s camp.

In an Oct. 21 e-mail, a CBS spokesman acknowledged discrepancies in Biden’s story and explained that he’s awaiting word from the “news people.” …

Hamill wants to clear her late father’s name before Biden’s story is even more widely accepted as fact.

“Suppose he becomes the next vice president,” she said. “Movies could be made about him and books could be written about him, all falsely portraying my father as a drunk driver. We need to set the record straight and clear my father’s name right now before this goes any further.”

To my knowledge, to this day Joe Biden had not apologized for lying and slandering Curtis Dunn.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Kamala Harris claims President Trump “already confessed” so impeachment shouldn’t take very long

You demorats have been screeching about impeachment for almost three years. If you really got the goods, then DO IT NOW. And don’t do it behind closed doors.

From Daily Mail: Kamala Harris claimed the impeachment of President Trump ‘shouldn’t take very long…because he has already confessed’.

The Democratic 2020 presidential candidate said on Sunday that Trump has already admitted to the necessary ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ outlined in the Constitution to see him removed from office.

Speaking at the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) forum in Iowa, Harris, who was previously attorney general of California and San Francisco, was asked if she would prosecute Trump.

The senator replied that Congress should already have enough to force Trump from the White House after his phone call with Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky was made public.

She told the audience: ‘Here’s the thing, I have been calling for the impeachment of this president for a long time and for the process to proceed, and based on everything I know, yes.

Trump is accused of trying to pressure Ukrainian leaders to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, over his time on the board of a natural gas company in the country.

In a phone call on July 25, Trump is alleged to have threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine unless a Ukrainian prosecutor looks into the Bidens. Trump denied any ‘quid pro quo’ was offered in the call and the White House later released a redacted transcript of the conversation.

Harris has previously called for Trump to be impeached during the nearly two-year Mueller probe over alleged Russian collusion in the 2016 presidential campaign – long before the Ukrainian revelations.

She went on to say on Sunday that Congress’ impeachment proceedings already had a ‘confession’, according to the Daily Wire.

The California senator reportedly added: ‘Here is how I think about it, because we have got a confession and it don’t take a prosecutor to see that was a confession. I mean, we have a confession, we have a cover-up, right?

Joe Biden is currently one of the front-runners for the Democrat 2020 nomination among a dozen candidates, including Harris.

Read the rest of the story here.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

President Trump on Biden: “He understood how to kiss Barack Obama’s ass”

President Trump was on fire last night at his rally in Minneapolis. I was laughing throughout his speech yet this part had me cracking up.

Keep America Great!

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Fauxcahontas Elizabeth Warren caught in another lie

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts), the fake Native American, has elbowed out Bernie Sanders, her chief rival for the Demonrat Party’s most “liberal” voters. Sanders ‘ heart attack last week didn’t help.

Warren is now running neck and neck with frontrunner Joe Biden. The RealClearPolitics polling average shows her trailing Biden by just 0.3% nationally and leading him by 2.7% in Iowa.

Warren had claimed Native American, specifically Cherokee, heritage. But the results of a DNA test showed she actually has minimal Cherokee ancestry, which forced her to issue a public apology for taking the test in the first place, but not for falsely claiming she is a Cherokee.

Now, another lie of Warren is uncovered.

Warren’s  has become a cornerstone of her stump speeches. She has used it to both explain her jump from teaching into the legal world as well as to showcase the difficulties that women face in the workplace.

Collin Anderson reports for the Washington Free Beacon, Oct. 7, 2019, that a cornerstone of Elizabeth Warren’s stump speeches is her claim that like other women, she had faced discrimination in the workplace. Warren claims that she was dismissed after her first year of teaching (1970-71) as a speech pathologist at Riverdale Elementary School in New Jersey because she was pregnant. She said that the principal of the school “showed [her] the door” at the end of the school year because she was “visibly pregnant.”

Journalist Meagan Day of Jacobin magazine was skeptical, pointing out that Warren’s story had changed over the years. In a 2007 interview Warren gave at the University of California-Berkeley she said she had left her teaching job because of the graduate school classes required for her to obtain a teaching certificate:

“I went back to graduate school and took a couple of courses in education and said, ‘I don’t think this is going to work out for me’. I was pregnant with my first baby, so I had a baby and stayed home for a couple of years, and I was really casting about, thinking, ‘What am I going to do?’ My husband’s view of it was, ‘Stay home. We have children, we’ll have more children, you’ll love this.’ And I was very restless about it.”

But in 2013, a year after she was sworn in as a U.S. senator, Warren sang an entirely different tune in her book, A Fighting Chance. She wrote:

By the end of the school year, I was pretty obviously pregnant. The principal did what I think a lot of principals did back then—wished me good luck, didn’t ask me back the next school year, and hired someone else for the job.

But minutes of Riverdale Board of Education meeting obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show that, instead of firing Warren for being pregnant, the board had tried to retain her:

  • Minutes of an April 21, 1971, Riverdale Board of Education meeting show that the board had voted unanimously on a motion to extend Warren a “2nd year” contract for a two-days-per-week teaching job, is similar to the one she had the previous year, her first year of teaching.
  • Minutes from a school board meeting held two months later on June 16, 1971, indicate that Warren had resigned from the school, effective June 30, 1971, and that the board “accepted with regret” her resignation.

Warren’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment on the board of education records.

Elizabeth Warren is not just a Fauxcahontas, she’s also a Liarwatha.

If anyone should be impeached, it’s Senator Elizabeth Warren, the pathological liar.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran.

Please follow and like us:
error0