Category Archives: Hillary Clinton

Chelsea Clinton rakes in $9 million for serving on the board of investment firm that is controlled by Hillary’s billionaire friend Barry Diller

This womyn is lucky her last name is Clinton. In the real world, she’d never be worth this much for such little work.

From Daily Mail: Chelsea Clinton has raked in $9 million in the past decade for serving on the board of a media and internet investment company controlled by her mother’s friend.

The former first daughter’s shares in IAC/InterActive Corp were valued last week at a whopping $8.95 million, according to financial publication Barron’s.

The 39-year-old, who has been on the IAC board as a director since 2011, receives an annual $50,000 retainer. She also receives $250,000 in restricted IAC stock units.

The company, which has an ownership stake in 150 brands like Vimeo and Tinder, is run by billionaire businessman Barry Diller. The billionaire, who is the longtime partner of designer Diane von Furstenberg, is a good friend of Chelsea’s mother Hillary Clinton.

Shares in IAC have surged in recent years. It has also seen Clinton’s stake sky-rocket. She reported owning the equivalent of 35,242 IAC shares at the end of December.

Her $8.95 million in shares increased from the $7.2 million she had in June last year and the $6.6 million from October 2018.

Chelsea’s biography on the IAC website largely touts her work with The Clinton Foundation. She also had a brief stint as a special correspondent on NBC from November 2011 through August 2014 during which she had an annual salary of $600,000.

Records obtained last year showed the Clinton took home just over $600,000 last year for her work as director on the boards of IAC and Expedia. Expedia is also owned by Diller.

The IAC board met just six times in 2018, while some members of the Expedia board were only obligated to attend two meetings last year.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Socialist Bernie Sanders: “I have seen up close the pain, death, and despair caused by war”

Demorats have their panties in a wad over President Trump ordering the drone killing of Iranian militia terrorist, Qasem Soleimani. As noted by Ben Shapiro, “According to Democrats, giving the Iranian terror regime access to hundreds of billions of dollars with no restrictions on terror use or ballistic missile testing was good, and killing the terrorist responsible for hundreds of American deaths is bad.”

That’s what TDS has done to the demorats.

Bernie Sanders is chiming in by claiming he’s got some “personal experience” into the despair caused by war. From a tweet of his on January 3:

As the former chair of the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs, I have seen up close the pain, death, and despair caused by war. And I know that it is rarely the children of the billionaire class who face the agony of reckless foreign policy.”

Well Bernie, sorry to burst your bubble but I’m going to say that YOUR 39 YEARS of bureaucratic experience doesn’t qualify you AT ANY LEVEL to speak about the pain of war.

There are claims on the internet that his parents were Holocaust survivors. They are not. He’s got nothing on the parental experiences of the pain caused by war.

All he’s got is the bureaucratic talking points.

Bernie Sanders has ZERO military experience so he’s got nothing on the individual experience of the pain caused by war.

All he’s got is the bureaucratic talking points.

Bernie Sanders spent his honeymoon in the Soviet Union in 1988

Bernie Sanders has no children so he’s never experienced parental anxiety of the pain caused by war.

All he’s got is the bureaucratic talking points.

I can up you several times, Mr. Sanders:

My father served in the Korean War. His experiences were terrible. I do not care to publicly share the full details I had growing up of his service and the effect it had on him. All I will say is that several childhood events of his “episodes” had a lasting effect on me.

I had three uncles who served in WWII. One of them never came back.

My boyfriend is in the military and has done a tour in the sandbox. Hey Bernie, ever get a text from a loved one in the bunker who is receiving incomings? On Christmas?

These experiences of mine are NOTHING compared to the following U.S. citizens who had NO REQUESTED RESPONSE from the Obama Administration while they were being attacked for a “YouTube video:”

How convenient for Sanders to turn the attack on an U.S. embassy and our much deserved response into an economic warfare card to benefit his clueless sheeple.

I mean really Mr. Sanders, ask yourself this:

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Saturday funnies!

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Hillary Clinton looks like an ‘evil potato’ after latest cosmetic surgery

During the 2016 presidential campaign, I had remarked on the chamaleon-like ever-changing appearance of Hillary Clinton. (See my post of Sept. 3, 2016, “Chameleon Hillary Clinton is back to looking like sh*t — and the return of her medical handler”)

The beast has morphed again.

Daily Mail reports that last Thursday night, Dec. 12, 2019, Hillary Clinton, 72, “looked wonderfully youthful” and “radiant” with “a wrinkle-free complexion and plumped-up cheeks” as she joined Bill Clinton at the “Ain’t Too Proud: The Temptations Musical” on Broadway in New York.

Daily Mail quotes two plastic surgeons (“aesthetic experts”) on Hillary’s new face:

  • Dr. Judy Todd, who runs the Synergy Clinic in Glasgow and London, said: “There also appears to be slightly more volume in the lips which could also be from a filler.”
  • Dr. Ross Perry, founder of www.cosmedics.co.uk, sycophantically said Hillary has been “genetically blessed” with good skin, but her new appearance could also be a result of Botox, injectable dermal fillers and Blepharoplasty, a procedure in which excess skin above the eye is removed. He said: “Hillary Clinton looks fantastic and I would suggest this is down to regular tweakments and procedures over the years, which appears less noticeable than having dramatic work done all in one go. Her forehead looks particularly smooth, which would suggest Botox has been administered in the forehead, frown line and around the eye area, as there appears to be minimal crows feet. For someone of 72, I’d expect to see a more furrowed brow with extensive creasing and lines around the eyes. Around the eye area again looks incredibly youthful, and as we age the skin around our eyes tends to become loose and wrinkled, making the eyes appear tired-looking. I would suspect Hilary may well have had Blepharoplasty which removes crepey, excess skin from above the eye which causes hooding and develops as we age. I would suggest she’s also had this to target the under eye bags and to smooth further wrinkles from the corners of her eyes. I’d say it’s also likely Hillary has had some help with the use of injectable dermal wrinkle injections. These tiny little injections work very simply by adding extra volume into the skin to fill out lines or creases, with the latest generation of deep fillers especially designed for use in larger areas, such as hollows that can appear below the eyes or in the cheek. As we can see in recent pictures, the cheek area looks full and rounded, which gives a more youthful appearance.”

Daily Mail points out that this is not the first time Hillary’s young-looking complexion has come under scrutiny:

  • During her 2016 presidential campaign there was speculation she’d had cosmetic surgery.
  • Journalist Edward Klein claimed in his 2015 book Unlikeable: The Problem with Hillary that Bill Clinton “wanted her to get a face-lift. She couldn’t do anything about the calendar — she’d be 69 years old in 2016 — but she could do something about the lines and sagging skin on her face.” Klein wrote that a cosmetic surgeon set up a discreet “mini operating room with the latest equipment” in the Clintons’ Chappaqua home. Hillary had her cheeks lifted, her wrinkles and lines Botoxed, and “work done on her eyes as well as on her neck and forehead.” Klein quoted one of Hillary’s friends: “She took it gradually and didn’t have anything drastic done, because she wanted to evaluate the changes as she proceeded. If it had started to make her look weird, she would have stopped it immediately. It was a pretty big deal and required multiple visits.”

“If it had started to make her look weird, she would have stopped it immediately.”

Clearly, Hillary is now ignoring that rule because she is looking weird after this latest round of “cosmetic” procedures.

More than weird, she is the stuff of nightmares.

See for yourself (you are forewarned!).

Here’s a sample of Daily Mail‘s best-rated readers’ comments:

Seo Young, Vancouver, Canada: “An evil potato.”

Reskammel, Cornwall, UK: “There’s no beauty secret. It’s simply the Embalming chemicals at work.”

RKGMCS, somewhere, United States: “Looks like the wicked witch’s face is melting”

Money for schools, USA: “Her plastic surgeon made Hillary look really weird!”

Marsali, East coast, United States: “Hillary looks crazy.”

Jojayboy, Bradenton, United States: “All I see is her looking more crazy than ever.”

brodydalle, Denver, United States: “She looks scary. Like she’d try to lure a child into a sewer with a red balloon.”

Sassy_Susie, Missouri, United States: “Not only are the Dems trying to fool everyone with this impeachment craziness. They are now trying to convince us that wrinkles just disappear with age.”

And my favorite:

actionazimuth, Colorado Springs, United States: “Still not POTUS.”

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Hollyweird hypocrite Debra Messing slams NBC for their “disgusting behavior”

TDS-infected Debra Messing

It’s not NBC’s disgusting attempt to protect predator and Clinton buddy Weinstein that has Debra so upset. This is something much more grievous.

There’s apparently some majorly important drama going on with NBC and their firing of a woman (Gabrielle Union) who claims it was due to racism.

Gabrielle complained about a white male performer who dressed up as Beyonce and changed the color of his skin. This is apparently “racially insensitive.”

Men dressing up as women in drag and pretending to live their lives as women is A-OK just as long as they don’t dare do anything to their skin color. Hey, I don’t make up the progressive rules.

TDS-infected actress Debra Messing (who worked for NBC for on her show Will & Grace from 1998 to 2006) is now getting in on the drama to call out racism and sexism, of course.

People Magazine reports that Messing supported a tweet from another fellow Hollyweird actress about the treatment of Gabrielle Union:

“…the Will and Grace star criticized the network in a group of scathing tweets.

“Thank you for this @EllenPompeo,” Messing, 51, wrote. “This is disgusting behavior from a network that has been my professional home for decades. Yes, women become ‘difficult,’ when their insistence on a respectful and professional working environment, is ignored.”

“Addressing a hostile work environment is inconvenient when there is a huge money making machine that is involved. It is cowardice, greed, and protection of the status quo revealed. Being ‘hands off,’ is inexcusable and reflects a laissez faire attitude toward systemic racism and sexism,” she continued, tagging Union.”

Read about all the drama and virtue signaling here.

Spare me your faux indignation about the “disgusting behavior” from the NBC network.

Don’t tell me you’ve lived under a rock during Ronan Farrow’s story about your “professional home” killing the Weinstein story during the 2016 election while YOUR preferred candidate was running for president. Talk about “protection of the status quo.”

Debra Messing with her preferred candidate

Messing claims she was “shocked” by the Weinstein allegations and that she “knew nothing” about them. Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Hollyweird is a small town girl and if we knew, then YOU knew.

Debra Messing worked with director Woody Allen in the 1998 film, “Celebrity.”

I performed many searches for Debra Messing and Woody Allen and found nothing where she criticized the accused pedophile.

Debra Messing (l) kisses up to Woody Allen

Being “hands off” about predators while seeking to maintain that “Celebrity” status and huge NBC-money payout is inexcusable, Debra. But good thing you’re so worried about a man dressing up to perform as Beyoncé.

Typical Hollyweird Hypocrite.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Wednesday Funnies! Epstein ‘Suicide’

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Robert Redford believes Trump’s presidency is a monarchy and he’s “deeply disturbed”

As we get closer to 2020, the unhinged demorats are letting their imaginations run super wild.

Since President Trump was elected, they have vowed to remove him from office. Three years later, with impeachment proceedings that aren’t moving fast enough for them; the left are in panic mode.

Imagine having a scab for three years that will not heal nor can you scratch it or remove it. The daily pain and reminder of your ailment eats away at your every move. Your misery consumes every thought and transfers into delusional thoughts that demorat-loving media gladly promote.

Such must be the case for TDS-infected actor Robert Redford.

He’s written an opinion piece for NBC News on their new platform called, “THINK.”

THINK is NBC News op-eds, in depth analyses and essays about news and current events. They say you can find opinions that will make you think differently and deeply about the world and our place in it.

Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

I perused THINK and found it is mostly full of progressive narratives. Appears their only goal is to help elect a demorat president in 2020. Would you expect anything less from a network that intentionally killed Ronan Farrow’s story on Clinton buddy and predator Weinstein?

Now THINK has given Redford a platform to whine about dictator-like President Trump and the “crisis” we are up against. He blathers on about how President Trump is single-handedly threatening the sacred rule of law, our essential freedom of the press and our precious freedoms of speech.

Somehow he manages to get through his diatribe without stating one piece of evidence.

Read his whole opinion piece here.

At the end, Redford desires for us to rededicate ourselves to voting for truth, character and integrity in our representatives (no matter which side we’re on).

Hard pass. If I want to educate myself on “truth,” “character” and “integrity,” it won’t be coming from NBC News or hypocrite Redford.

DCG

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Elites’ contempt for America’s white middle class

In early March 2016, three months before the last Republican Party primary elections that sealed Trump’s ascendancy as the party’s presidential nominee, Politico Magazine contributing editor Michael Lind called Trump “the Perfect Populist”—”one with broader appeal to the right and the center than his predecessors in recent American political history—so much so it could put him in the White House”.

Lind was unusual among pundits in predicting Trump’s electoral victory, as according to polling data he did not have even an outside chance of winning. What catapulted Trump to the White House, to the enduring shock and disbelief of the Democratic Party, was his message of what Victor Davis Hanson in his book The Case for Trump identified as “middle-class populism”—a populism of “less government, doubt over overseas military commitments, fears of redistribution and globalization, and distrust of cultural elites.” Their distrust, Hanson maintains, fundamentally was a reaction, not a catalyst, to the elites’ contempt for the white middle class:

[S]corn for the white middle class . . . was widespread among many elites, and it ignited a Trump backlash . . . . The anger that Trump tapped had been a long time in coming. But few politicians knew it firsthand, much less saw it as merited or even useful in the political sense . . . . [Trump] had seen a critical preexisting and vast swath of potential voters in proverbial swing states who were . . . resentful over the disdain shown them by elites, especially the likes of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. And they were irate at the winners of globalization who had somehow blamed them for being the global economy’s losers.

In other words, the elites’ contempt for the white middle and working classes predated the 2016 election.

Except in the cases of Obama and Hillary Clinton, the following account of contemptuous elites are from Hanson’s The Case for Trump.

To begin, eight years before the 2016 election, at a fundraising event in San Francisco on April 6, 2008, presidential hopeful Barack Obama condescendingly dismissed working-class voters in old industrial towns decimated by job losses as “bitter” people who “cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

For her part, at an LGBT fundraiser in Manhattan on September 9, 2016, Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton urged supporters to “stage an intervention” if they had friends who might vote Trump. She then dissed millions of Americans over whom she intended to rule as president. Clinton said, “you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the ‘basket of deplorables’. The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it.” After she lost the election to Trump and the “deplorables,” in a public speech in Mumbai, India on March 10, 2018, Clinton redoubled her contempt for Trump voters. She said, “So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward,” thereby implying that the 63 million Americans who had voted for Trump were demoralized, monotonous, listless, and degenerating.

Hillary Clinton’s aides were just as dismissive. In her book Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns, and One Intact Glass Ceiling, New York Times reporter Amy Chozick described how Clinton’s inner circle looked down on Trump voters as fodder for their amusement: “The Deplorables always got a laugh, over living-room chats in the Hamptons, at dinner parties under the stars on Martha’s Vineyard, over passed hors d’oeuvres in Beverly Hills, and during sunset cocktails in Silicon Valley.”

Elites less prominent than Obama and Clinton similarly were contemptuous of Trump supporters. As examples, on August 12, 2016, FBI agent Peter Strzok texted to his paramour Lisa Page (both are married) that Trump voters stank: “Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support.” Another unidentified FBI employee texted an FBI attorney on the day after the 2016 election that “Trump’s supporters are all poor to middle class, uneducated, lazy POS [pieces of sh*t].”

In a tweet on January 7, 2017, Melinda Byerley, founder of the Silicon Valley company Timeshare CMO, wrote: “One thing middle America could do is to realize that no educated person wants to live in a sh**hole with stupid people. Especially violent, racist, and/or misogynistic ones . . . . When corporations think about where to locate call centers, factories, development centers, etc., they also have to deal with the fact that those towns have nothing going for them. No infrastructure, just a few bars and a terrible school system.”

Some members of the media were just as disdainful. In a tweet on August 2018, Politico reporter Marc Caputo mocked the crowd at a Trump rally as toothless hicks: “If you put everyone’s mouths together in this video, you’d get a full set of teeth.” Although Caputo initialy apologized for and deleted the tweet, he later doubled down, calling Trump supporters “garbage people.”

Another journalist, tech writer and member of the New York Times’s editorial board Sarah Jeong, a graduate of Harvard Law School who is of Korean heritage, tweeted: “Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins?”; “Oh man it’s kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men”; and “White people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants.”

Hillary Clinton wasn’t the only politician who regarded Trump voters with unconcealed contempt. On September 15, 2018, during a speech at the Human Rights Campaign’s annual dinner in Washington, D.C., former Vice President Joe Biden called the deplorables “virulent” “dregs of society”. He said: “Despite losing in the courts, and in the court of opinion, these forces of intolerance remain determined to undermine and roll back the progress you all have made. This time they—not you—have an ally in the White House. This time they have an ally. They’re a small percentage of the American people—virulent people, some of them the dregs of society.” Hanson points out that those “dregs of society” in 2016 numbered 63 million—46% of all Americans who voted.

Nor were Progressives the only elites who held the white middle and working classes in contempt. Republican “never Trumpers” were equally derisive.

In a March 2016 op-ed, National Review’s conservative social critic Kevin Williamson wrote: “The truth about these dysfunctional, downscale communities is that they deserve to die. Economically, they are negative assets. Morally, they are indefensible . . . . The white American underclass is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and used heroin needles.”

On February 8, 2017, on a panel at the American Enterprise Institute, Bill Kristol, founder of the Weekly Standard, said white, working-class Americans should be replaced by immigrants. Kristol said:

“Look, to be totally honest, if things are so bad as you say with the white working class, don’t you want to get new Americans in? Basically if you are in free society, a capitalist society, after two, three, four generations of hard work, everyone becomes kind of decadent, lazy, spoiled, whatever. Then, luckily, you have these waves of people coming in from Italy, Ireland, Russia, and now Mexico, who really want to work hard and really want to succeed, and really want their kids to live better lives than them, and aren’t sort of clipping coupons or hoping that they can hang on and, meanwhile, grew up as spoiled kids and so forth.”

Another “never Trumper” conservative who became a self-described “man without a party” after the 2016 election, expressed the same wish. In a June 18, 2018 op-ed, Washington Post columnist Max Boot wrote: “If only we could keep the hard-working Latin American newcomers and deport the contemptible Republican cowards—that would truly enhance America’s greatness.”

For his part, New York Times conservative columnist David Brooks, with the ragged teeth, echoed the same sentiments in a January 29, 2018 op-ed: “These rural places are often 95 percent white . . . . They are often marked by economic stagnation, social isolation, family breakdown and high opioid addiction . . . . It is a blunt fact of life that, these days, immigrants show more of these virtues than the native-born.”

Hanson points out that these Progressive and conservative “never Trump” elites not only are racist, they are hypocrites. Conveniently, the elites excused their crude stereotyping of white, middle America by insisting that racism against whites was not racism. While accusing the middle and working classes they deride for “white privilege,” the elites are blind to their own outsized privileges. In Hanson’s words:

Often the white elite signaled their disgust of the ‘white privilege’ of the disintegrating middle class as a means of exempting their own quite genuine white privilege of insider contacts, professional degrees, wealth, inheritance, and influence.

I am baffled by why the elites hold such virulent hatred and contempt for America’s white middle and working classes who have built this country. It is a phenomenon for psychiatric professionals to explain. Alas, being of the same privileged professional elite class, they probably are infected with the same virus.

Perhaps our readers can hazard some guesses to explain this phenomenon.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

We The Voters Are Being Impeached

Not just President Trump

I call it the “Inevitable Outcome” strategy

This is a psyop pointed directly at the American people. You know the trick: Al Gore loses an election and throws a tantrum by demanding a recount that stretches for months. Al Franken loses a senatorial election and demands recounts until he has found enough (fraudulent) votes to “win.” Hillary Clinton loses the presidential election and launches an army of deep state operatives bent on driving President Trump out of office. Frankly, it wearies me.

The real attack is on the voters

As each new day comes, with the Demonrat’s Bolshevik Impeachment Circus carrying on, the sense of being personally attacked grows stronger. It’s not just an attack on a politician (President Trump), it is an attack on the American people and the Constitution of the United States.

Like a school yard bully, they will threaten to hurt you if you don’t give them your lunch

That threat hangs in the air with every move we make to restore our nation. Appoint a conservative judge, and expect a bunch of liars to come out of the woodwork mercilessly attacking the candidate with false accusations. Take a conservative stand on air and expect be doxed and to see a screaming mob outside your home.

The one thing the Left wants is power

If we do not give them what they demand, we can expect to see their tantrums escalate until we give in. If we do give in to their demands, the tyranny will become perfect for the hundred year anniversary of the Russian Revolution. There are things worse than death; we must stand against them at all costs.

Where we are now

The Leftist Politicians, together with the News and Entertainment Media, Leftist Academia, Tech Giants, Atifa, and all their hordes are rushing in at us. But as they fully commit and show their true colors, they are unknowingly exposing themselves to the scrutiny of the watching world. They are permanently discrediting themselves from serious consideration of their views in the future.

They have gotten away with this for a long time, but that was largely because they had not been unmasked. Walter Cronkite, “the most trusted man in America,” was not known for his true allegiance to the devil.

Thankfully now, they have unmasked themselves

…and their ability to deceive will be greatly diminished.

~ TD

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

We have a winner!

This was a very competitive contest because there were many very clever captions submitted. Y’all clearly were inspired. LOL

The writers of FOTM voted for what each considered to be the best (#1) and second-best (#2) captions. Each #1 vote is worth 4 points; a #2 vote is worth 2 points.

And the (narrow) winner of the 212th FOTM Caption Contest, with two #1 votes, totaling 8 points, is . . .

GregB!

Here is the winning caption:

Still looking for “Russian Collusion.” It must be here somewhere!

Vette is in 2nd place, with one #1 vote and one #2 vote, totaling 6 points. Here’s the caption:

I’m still SNOT your President!

DFJ150Jackie Puppet, and two William captions (each with one #1 vote), and carry and Goldbug (each with two #2 votes) are in 3rd place, each with 4 points. Here are their captions:

DFJ150: “HRC picking the latest reason for why she lost the 2016 election.”

Jackie Puppet: “$50 bucks Hillary eats it!

William: “Hillary, having a senior moment, misunderstands when the CNN host asks her to pick the winner of the demonrat debates”

William: “Hillary, while having a bout of Kuru, attempts to give herself a brain massage”

carry: “Hillary going on Lunch Break.”

Goldbug: “She’s certainly not my pick.”

operaghost and Tanc are in 4th place, each with one #2 vote and 2 points. Here are their captions:

operaghost: “They’ll never find my emails in here…”

Tanc: “Now we know what the secret ingredient is in her SPIRIT COOKING.”

WELL DONE, EVERYONE!

Congratulations, GregB!

Here is your super-duper Award of Excellence, all ready for framing!

For all the other caption submissions, go here.

Be here later today for our next, very exciting Caption Contest! 😀

~Eowyn

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0