16-year-old Greta Thunberg became an instant darling of the Left when she gave a doomsday speech at the 2019 UN Climate Action Summit in New York City, in which she berated the assembled world leaders, including President Trump, of ignoring “climate change” and proclaimed an imminent end of the world of “mass extinction” and the collapse of “entire ecosystems”.
Time magazine actually selected Thunberg to be Person of the Year — the youngest person ever to be so named. In November 2019, Thunberg’s adoring fans plastered her face onto a gigantic 60′ x 30′ mural in downtown San Francisco.
But there is every evidence that this 16-year-old girl is a puppet of shadowy adults behind the scenes. (See my post of Dec. 18, 2019: “Greta Thunberg: Puppet of the Year”)
Here is more evidence.
Greta Thunberg has a Facebook page that appears to be her page to which presumably she alone posts. Indeed, Facebook‘s “page transparency” shows her as the confirmed owner.
However, a recent software glitsch revealed that her father and a United Nations activist actually post on and run her Facebook page.
Wired‘s Lily Hay Newman explains the glitsch, January 10, 2020:
Facebook Pages give public figures, businesses, and other entities a presence on Facebook that isn’t tied to an individual profile. The accounts behind those pages are anonymous unless a Page owner opts to make the admins public. You can’t see, for example, the names of the people who post to Facebook on WIRED’s behalf. But a bug that was live from Thursday evening until Friday morning allowed anyone to easily reveal the accounts running a Page, essentially doxing anyone who posted to one…. All it took to exploit the bug was opening a target page and checking the edit history of a post. Facebook mistakenly displayed the account or accounts that made edits to each post, rather than just the edits themselves.
During the Facebook glitsch, enterprising netizens got to work and discovered that two adult men post as 16-year-old Greta on her Facebook page: Svante Thunberg and Adarsh Prathap (ZeroHedge).
(1) Greta’s dad, Svante Thunberg, a 51-year-old Swedish actor:
(2) Adarsh Prathap, a United Nations climate activist in India:
Adarsh Prathap’s LinkedIn page says he was a “Youth Reporter” at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)’s 2017 UN Climate Change Conference (COP23) in Bonn, Germany. Prathap currently is the youth coordinator for Youth Engaged in Wetlands, which calls itself “an international youth team committed to the conservation, protection, and wise-use of wetlands”.
After her adult male puppeteers were uncovered, Greta Thunberg continues to insist that she writes all the content posted by her father and Prathap. 😎
~Eowyn
Drudge Reporthas gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!
But the bonus is we’ll have one less Hollyweird libtard in our country.
From Yahoo: Orange Is the New Black star Yael Stone is giving up her green card to reside in her native Australia full-time amid the global “climate war.”
As bush fires devastate the continent, the 34-year-old actress, who played Lorna Morello in the Netflix series, took to social media to slam the lack of leadership from Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison amid the ecological disaster.
She went on to call for regular citizens to step up as leaders — and said she would be making immediate changes to her own lifestyle, starting with giving up her green card in the U.S. and residing full time in Australia to reduce her own carbon footprint.
I’m sitting in a dark room wondering what the hell is happening,” Stone said in the first of two Instagram videos. “Our country is on fire… and our prime minister has done absolutely nothing. Cold, calculated nothing. We don’t have leaders, we have cowards.
“The leaders we have are the people around us and that’s what we have to become. We have to step up because this is war. This is a climate war. And for the first time, our enemy is not wearing a uniform that we’ll be able to recognise. Our enemy is our own behaviour. And, yeah sure — on an individual level things can change but it’s corporate-wide, it’s government-wide, it’s systematic changes that must happen — and they must happen yesterday. It’s time to act.”
She went on to detail the personal change that she’s going to make.
“To begin with, I’d like to announce that I’m giving up my green card. After a long considered process, we’ve come to understand that it’s unethical for us to set up a life in two countries knowing what we know,” explained Stone, who shares a one-year-old child with Jack Manning Bancroft, founder of AIME, the Australian Indigenous Mentoring Experience.
“The carbon emissions alone from that flying, it’s unethical, it’s not right. So I will be going through the process of giving up my green card and saying goodbye to a life in America. I’m going to be here in Australia doing the work I can to make a difference here because the time is now.”
DCG
Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!
On January 3, at the direction of President Trump, missiles shot from American drones assassinated Iranian general Qassem Soleimani in Baghdad, Iraq.
Soleimani was a major general in Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and commander of its Quds Force, a division primarily responsible for military and clandestine operations outside of Iran. He was described by an ex-CIA operative as “the single most powerful operative in the Middle East today” and the principal military strategist and tactician in Iran’s effort to combat Western influence and promote the expansion of Shiite and Iranian influence throughout the Middle East.
The air attack that killed Soleimani and four members of Iraqi militias followed attacks on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad on December 31, 2019, by supporters of an Iran-backed Iraqi militia.
The U.S. Defense Department said Soleimani had approved the attacks on the American embassy and was planning further attacks on American diplomats and military personnel. Trump justified the assassination on the grounds that Soleimani posed an “imminent threat” to American lives. But the assassination was not approved by Congress, nor did it have the consent of the Iraqi government, leading to controversy regarding the legality of killing an Iranian military leader over Iraqi airspace.
It is not just Democrats and Hollyweirdos who are in an uproar over President Trump’s greenlighting of the drone assassination. Shockingly, Jim Fetzer has joined the anti-Trumpers, convinced that the Soleimani assassination signifies Trump’s caving in to Israel.
Note: James Fetzer is a professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota-Duluth, and the author and editor of countless volumes on conspiracies and false flags, including the banned-by-Amazon.com Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It Was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control, which is available free in PDF format.
After having tolerated his previous pro-Israel moves–the Embassy to Jerusalem, Golan Heights to Israel, defunding the UN Palestinian-refugee effort and the expanded definition of “anti-Semitism”–this for me is the last straw. I can no longer support this Netanyahu-stooge for President of the United States.I am going to have to find a more suitable candidate, which will be tough sledding. But I am fed up with the Trump disaster.
I am distraught. He [Trump] appears to have gone stark raving mad.
Actually, I believe he has virtually destroyed his prospects for reelection at a single blow. He was supposed to get us out of these wars in the Middle East, not start new ones. And now the Democrats have a bona fide reason to impeach him, which even I would support. I can no longer stand with this gullible sap who should have known better. He allowed himself to be played by [Israeli Prime Minister] Bibi [Netanyahu]. I would rather have a real American president than an Israeli stooge. I can no longer endorse him. Bernie [Sanders], ironically, may be our best bet, especially were he to run with Tulsi, where their foreign policies are virtually indistinguishable and she strengthens him in ways no other running mate could. A stunning 2020 reversal.
Latest reports are that Trump’s poll numbers are UP. I am dismayed but the American people are extremely ignorant of history, even relatively recent history. This is more than embarrassing. I can no longer support him.
In other words, Fetzer no longer supports Trump because he believes Trump is an Israeli stooge. Instead, Fetzer declares his endorsement of Bernie Sanders for the presidency — a socialist Jew who volunteered in an Israeli kibbutz for several months when he was 22, supports gun control, and who will collapse the U.S. economy with his multitrillion-dollars Medicare-for-all and the climate-change Green New Deal.
~Eowyn
Drudge Reporthas gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!
I don’t know why I do this to myself. Sometimes I get on Twitter and peruse the tweets of Bernie Sanders supporters.
It’s hysterical at first, then dumbfounding and then you realize it’s really, really sad. It’s a reflection of our government indoctrination system and the cesspool that is social media.
It’s also a reflection, I think, of a couple other areas: 1) Demorat’s desire to be stuck in perpetual victimhood mode, 2) a lack of personal drive and responsibility for creating your own wealth and happiness, 3) a fanatical interest in being able to control how other people use their money and 4) when you combine the first three factors you have to come up with a fourth: envy.
So I stumbled upon the Twitter account the other night by a millennial who goes by the name of “electronic piss.”
Here’s her gem of a tweet: “2020 the year we make it completely socially unacceptable to stan/look up to people who are literally committing genocide by choosing not to redistribute their wealth.”
en
“Electronic piss” had retweeted a Time editor’s tweet with the following pictures and caption, “Nothing more needs to be said:”
Pro tip: Don’t go to the “electronic piss” Twitter timeline unless you are willing to read extremely sexual tweets and a serious amount of stupidity.
First of all, can you demorats pick a firm number of years for when we are to expire without a complete redistribution of everyone’s money? Is the world ending in 12 years or 20 before rich people cough up enough money for your scam? I’d like to mark the end date on my calendar, thanks.
Secondly, there’s a LOT of demorats on the list of the richest folk in the world. There’s even one white, demorat man running to be your president! Why aren’t you demanding those demorats give up all their monies in the name of your climate emergency cause?
Third: Since there’s a lot of Chinese people on that list of the evil rich who must redistribute their wealth to save the planet, when are you (and take that selective-mute Greta with you) going to go to Hong Kong to protest climate change?
If Bernie Sanders and his supporters truly believe in the “great planetary crisis we now face,” then how do they justify his owning three homes? By his “offsetting” carbon emissions?
Remember: Any answer given will be mental gymnastics because liberal logic isn’t designed to make sense.
DCG
Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!
On October 23,2019 a fire ignited in Northern California. The location was next to John Kincade Road. southeast of the town of Cloverdale in Sonoma county. A place that I am very familiar. It’s where I grew up and called home for many years.. Spending about 35 years in Sonoma county(home of the Bohemian Grove) , there are few places within the county I haven’t left my footprint. That would include The Geysers geothermal field located in California’s Mayacamas Mountains which John Kincade Road passes through. The birth of the Kincade Fire.
Cal fire reports fire starting at 9:27 pm.. If you do a Google search you will find the media reporting start times at 9:24 pn and 9:27 pm. When the fire was called in, we are told the caller reported a power line was down. The caller or the report of the power line being down has not been confirmed. Unconfirmed or not , the media still reports it as if it were factual evidence. The media is also leading people to believe it was at a location of a PG & E high power transmission tower PG &E claims that one of its lines e failed at exactly 9:20 pm. Four or seven minutes (depending which media organization is reporting it) before the fire started. Here is a photo of the tower and the location. Image 1A
Image 1A
There is a video that is being circulated that shows the exact time and location the fire started. The various media organizations claim this video proves where, how, why and when the fire started. They insinuate the power line broke on the transmission line tower, shut the light off at powerplant building (seen in the photo) and that the broken power line started the fire 4 minutes or 7 minutes later, at that very location. I’m going to use that video and show you that the fire started at/or before their 4 minute or 7 minute claim. I’ll also show you that the fire ignited at a different location. Vindicating PG & E for being the cause of this fire.
The video they/we are using was filmed from around 20 to 21 miles away. The camera was located on a tower in Santa Rosa. It’s part of a network of cameras placed throughout California set up to spot fires. The Image 2A is a nightshot of the location of the transmission tower from 20 miles away. The bright light is the location of the building by the transmission tower. On the right in the image there is a map. The yellow triangle at the bottom is the camera’s location and the yellow balloon is where the light is located at. This is the camera that captured the frames in the video.
Image 2A
The video is a time lapse video. It’s presented at a higher speed. When played at the speed presented, it appears that the light went out and the fire started at the same location. I’ve provided the video below.
The video can be deceiving when only viewed at the higher speed. What I did was slow the video down, closer to actual time, to get a better understanding of the actual time the fire bwecame visable. I managed to capture four frames back to back. One frame was at 21:19:51(the last time the light was on). Next frame was at 21:19:55(no light, no fire visable). Next frame was at 21:20:09(first time fire becomes visable but difficult to see so I tossed it). Final frame is at 21:20:13(when the fire becomes clearly visable).
Keeping three frames I stacked them frame by frame so that you can see all three events occurred within a 18 second time period. Image 3A The bottom frame is when the fire becomes visable. The middle frame(red box) shows the time between the light being visable and the fire being visable. The top frame show the last time the light was visable. Notice the times. The fire becomes visable within 18 seconds after the light shut off. Proving the fire started long before 9:24 pm or 9:27 pm. There was no 4 or 7 minutes later. Also, notice the locations of the light and the fire. Two different locations. Remember, this is being filmed from 20 miles away. The fire and light appear close together. As you get closer to the event, the distance between the two locations is far greater.
Image 3A
In the next image I took 1/2 of the first frame and 1/2 the last frame and matched them together to show the 2 different locations. Image 4A
Image 4A
The video and images clearly show that the fire started at a different loication and long beforew the 4 or 7 minutes. So where was the ignition point? Taking the informatioin I had available, I did the following. I knew the distance from the camera was around 20 to 21 miles away. The angle was about 2 degrees difference between the fire and the light. I used the method inImage 5A and came up with the results in Image 6A.
Image 5A
In Image 6A the red ballon is the location of the powereplant building with the light that shut off and the transmission tower that supposedly started the fire. My results led me to believe fire started in the area circled in green. My location is pretty close to the location Cal Fire post as being the ignition point of the fire as seen in Image 7A( Cal Fire, red ballon. The blue circle is location the media is pushing).
image 7A
Something I should also mention is that the fire became visable from 20 miles away within 18 seconds. The fire had to have been burning a lot longer than 18 seconds to be visable at that distance. The only other way to get a fire to flash that quickly is by using an accelerant. In the case of an accelerant, there would have been a huge flash when the fire was ignited. Exactly what a witness in this next video mentioned.
Additional talking points
Calpine
The media is focused on that single location as being to ignition point. Why don’t they put some attention on the owner of the powerplant building where the light shut off? The owner is Calpine. Calpine ownes the majority of the powerplants at The Geysers. They claim to have shut their facilities down due to high winds. Why? Winds have zero effect on geothermal plants. PG & E owns all the high power transmission lines. Wind would have no impact on the powerplant. Also, the powerplants generate their own power. PG &E high power transmission line failing would not shut the lights off at the power plant. Even if it was connected to the plant. Powerplants provide electricity to PG &E, not the opposite way around.. Any line failure of PG &E would never shut the power off at the powerplant.
Calpine is owned by Energy Capital Partrners(ECP). ECP has owned assets in every major power market in the USA. Their portfolio can be viewed here.
Cal Fire
It’ was fairly easy to eliminate the transmission tower as being the cause of the fire. Why doesn’t Cal Fire speak up?
Cal Fire resources .
“CAL FIRE owns and operates over 3,000 fire and emergency response and resource protection vehicles. In support of its ground forces, the CAL FIRE emergency response air program includes 23 Grumman S-2T 1,200 gallon airtankers, 11 UH-1H Super Huey helicopters, and 14 OV-10A airtactical. From 13 air attack and nine helitack bases located statewide, aircraft can reach most fires within 20 minutes”.
In addition I found the following. They have 61 dozers, 50 fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft which include , 2 Air King A200 and 1 or more of the following, Dornier Do-228, C-23A Sherpa (SD3-30), Air Tractor AT-802A “FireBoss” , Grumman S-2T, Lockheed P-2 Neptune, CL-215/ Bombardier 415 “Superscooper”, Douglas DC-7,McDonnell Douglas MD-87, British Aerospace Bae 146/ Avro RJ85, L188 Electra, Lockheed C-130 Hercules, Boeing 747, DC-10, AH-1 Firewatch “Cobra” ,Sikorsky S-61, Sikorsky S-64, Sikorsky S -70 “Firehawk”,Eurocopter AS-332L, Boeing-Vertol BV 107, Boeing 234 “Chinook”, Kaman “K-Max”, Bell 212, Bell 205 A++, Bell 412, Bell 407, Bell 206B “JetRanger”, Bell 206L-III “LongRanger”, Eurocopter AS350 AStar, MD 500D, Aérospatiale SA 315B “Lama”, Alouette 316B, Lockheed C-130, UH -60 “Blackhawk”, Boeing CH-46 “Sea Knight”, CH -47 “Chinook”, Sikorsky CH-53E “Super Stallion” (Sikorsky S-80E). For details click here.
Cal Fire’s budget is up to 2.6 billion dollars.
Besides wondering why Cal Fire has all the military class aircraft that we never see, I have to ask ” with all the money spent on Cal Fire and the inventory of helicopters and dozers that they own, why did the decide to contract out for fire suppression instead of using their own inventory?” Cal Fire didn’t use any of their dozers or helicopters for the kincade fire,
CalFire
California has become a “hustling ground” for the state leadership(Democrats). Clearly it looks as if they are using Cal Fire and fire disasters to scame money out of Californians as well as tax payers throughout the USA. The residents in California end up suffering the most. Cal Fire knows exactly what caused the Kincade fire. Democrats have made it clear that they want to control/ownership the power supply in California. Cal Fire’s silence only helps them attain that goal. Cal Fire’s leadership is a joke. Back in the day we used to have smoke jumpers that would have shut this fire down. Where are they? More time was spent talking about, watching the fire then was spent on fighting it. Totally disgusting. Having some experience fighting forest fires I understand it’s difficult work so I commend those that actually fought the fire. My appreciation goes out to you.
I am in no way a fan of PG &E. I am far less a fan of the democrat leadership. It would be nice to see a little bit of integrity coming from their way. I don’t believe for one second that PG &E is responsible for the Kincade fire. PG &E had shut the power down at 5:00 pm earlier that day. The light we saw in the video had to be running on the powerplants own electricity. Also, the high power transmission lines are built to handle winds up to 145 mph. Another thing that never gets mentioned is that there are other companies that have power lines in the same area.
PG &E initiated its power shut offs were more than likely done because high winds automatically shut down their wind generators thoughout the state. It wasn’t fire they were worried about. They were worried about not being able to supply the power needed.
The high winds have zero to do with climate change, If a person wants to know what causes the weather all they would need to do is see who was flying “weather modification” missions earlier that week. That’s the cause of California droughts and all the dead trees through out California. That’s why we have man made aluminum dust covering a large part of the state.
My last to thoughts today are “Never believe anything that comes out of the mouth of a California politician or State official, at any level. They are always lying to you” and “The fire evacuations during the Kincade fire were not done to save people. They were done because they didn’t want you to see what they were doing.” Even if you saw something…….
The left will tell you that we need drag queens. Some say we need them “now more than ever.”
According to the Daily Beast, drag queens are “a celebration of love, self-empowerment, and subversive fabulousness that’s essential in today’s climate.”
Other reasons we need drag queens? So they can teach us about makeup (particularly contouring) and – of course – to read to our young children. Because we can address serious problems in our culture through the joy of reading.
Environmental activists lecture us about everything we do – from air travel to eating out to the number of children one chooses to have. Has anyone ever questioned the environmental impact drag queens have on our planet?
The personal care industry generates $500 billion per year and nearly EVERY product touches plastic.
The other day I got dressed and realized that every beauty and cosmetic product I use touches fossil fuels whether it be in the ingredients, production, packaging or distribution. I’m not worried about my carbon footprint yet am reminded all the time by progressives that I need to reduce it to save the planet.
Takes a LOT of fossil fuel production for this transformation
I’m guessing that drag queens have makeup kits that are three or four times the size of mine. Drag queens MUST use foundation and contouring sticks (which I never use). I purchase a new blush compact about every nine months. I’ll bet you that drag queens use one (if not more) blush compact every month.
• Medical adhesive to cover eyebrows, applied using a disposable mascara wand
• Translucent powder on the brows
• Foundation base (also known as paint stick)
• Contour color
• White paint stick for highlighting (using beauty blender)
• Eye gel liner (applied using angle brush)
• Bullet tip brush for eye shaping
• Brown shadow as nose contour and eye blend color
• Four pairs of Elegant Lashes #301 on the top and one pair of smaller lashes on the bottom
• Lip stick
• Apply a mix of fine and salt grain craft glitter to make lips pop
I’m sure the “Felicity” uses many more products and tools that were not on that list (eye shadow, Q-tips, brushes, and hair/wig and cleansing products).
My makeup routine includes 7 products that last me a long, long time.
Are drag queens given any lectures about the environmental impact of their cosmetic use? That would be a big fat NO.
Drag queens are protected from the wrath of environmental zealots because of progressives’ desire to destroy gender norms.
When you’ve got an agenda to push, the rules mean nothing. Works for Leonardo DiCaprio, Hanoi Jane and Al Gore.
DCG
Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!
This makes perfect sense to demorats. Kill jobs then get the suffering masses on government welfare. And it can be done under the guise of a manufactured (climate emergency) crisis.
DCG
Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!
At this point, I expect the “experts” to tell us that the only thing that isn’t bad for your carbon footprint is abortion and doctor-assisted suicide.
From Daily Mail: Families that often dine out and consume large quantities of sweets and alcohol are likely to have a higher carbon footprint than meat eaters, a study claims.
Researchers came to this conclusion after studying the food habits and carbon footprints of around 60,000 households across Japan.
They found that meat consumption typically only accounts for only 10 per cent of the different in environmental impact between low and high carbon households.
In contrast, households with high carbon footprints typically consumed around two to three times more sweets and alcohol than those with low footprints.
Based on their findings, the team are now advising people to cut down their intake on these products to help save the planet.
Nature and colleagues surveyed the food supply chain and consumption habits of around 60,000 households from across Japan’s 47 prefectures.
The researchers found that the levels of meat consumption were largely constant from household-to-households, but their carbon footprints varied considerably — with other foodstuffs appearing more responsible.
Eating out, for example, was found to contribute 175 per cent more carbon emissions for the average household than eating meats.
In fact, dining in restaurants was seen to contribute an annual average of 770 kilograms of greenhouse gases towards the environmental impact of those households with a high carbon footprint. In contrast, meat consumption cost just 280 kilograms.
In Japan, many households have turned vegan after learning that beef production emits 20 times the emissions per gram of protein as growing beans.
Professor Kanemoto and colleagues, however, have said that a one-size-fits-all policy is ill-advised. ‘If we think of a carbon tax, it might be wiser to target sweets and alcohol if we want a progressive system,’ said Professor Kanemoto.
Our findings suggest that high carbon footprints are not only a problem for a small number of meat lovers in Japan.’
‘If we are serious about reducing our carbon footprints, then our diets must change.’
First it was libtard Sally Field joining Hanoi Jane at her Friday DC protests. She’s a critical part of the fight for green jobs, y’all.
Now feminist Gloria Steinem is the latest to join Hanoi Jane in her environmental protests PR stunts in DC. Apparently she believes we need government action on the environment and a reduction in fossil fuel production.
Steinem lives in NYC. Along with being in DC to get arrested on Friday, let’s take a look and see where the pro-abort Gloria Steinem has been lately, shall we?
According to her Instagram posts, Steinem has been in the following locations:
November 22: In Bellingham, WA at the Mount Baker Theatre for some event associated with Planned Parenthood November 7: At a women’s center at Vanderbilt University for a Bumble event in Nashville, TN November 1: A book “celebration” at The Theater at Ace Hotel DTLA in Los Angeles, CA October 31: Receiving the Freedom Award from The National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis, TN
Committed to fossil fuel reduction: Steinem’s book tour travel schedule
And here’s part of the reason Steinem recently traveled across the country:
October 18: “On the road again… Then, it was to cover Governor Rockefeller for NYMag; this time it is to promote my new book, The Truth Will Set You Free, But First It Will Piss You Off! I will be traveling across the country and speaking with friends along the way. The tour kicks off with an official book launch on November 5th at @pioneerworks in NYC, where I will be joined by @ronanfarrow and @vibetheater. Hope to see you there.”
Wonder how much of that fossil fuel production Steinem used in her travels across the country to promote her book?
Typical leftist hypocrite.
DCG
Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!
Greta Thunberg is a 16-year-old Swedish “environmental activist” who has Asperger syndrome, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and selective mutism.
Thunberg first became known for her activism in August 2018 when she began skipping school to protest outside the Swedish parliament by holding up a sign saying (in Swedish) “School strike for the climate”. That led to other students protesting in their own communities, which resulted in a school climate strike movement called Fridays for Future.
On September 23, 2019, Thunberg became an instant darling of America’s Left when she gave a doomsday speech at the 2019 UN Climate Action Summit in New York City, in which she berated the assembled world leaders, including President Trump, of having “stolen” her dreams and her childhood with their “empty words” and talking only about money and “fairytales of eternal economic growth”. She then proclaimed:
“People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction.”
After Thunberg’s UN speech, student strikes took place every week somewhere across the world. In 2019, there were at least two coordinated multi-city protests involving over one million students each, to no effect. That led to Thunberg whining that school strikes have achieved nothing, as if student strikes somehow would convince China and India, the biggest polluters in the world, instantly to reverse course.
On December 11, 2019, instead of the truly courageous Hong Kong protesters who put their lives at risk by standing up to the tyrannical Chinese Communist government, Time magazine selected Greta Thunberg to be Person of the Year — the youngest person ever to be so named. Time’s doomsday rationale for their choice:
Her message is one the Boomers would have recognized in the 1960s: Our elders have sold us out. The system isn’t working. The time to act is now. Perhaps even more drastically than it did in 1966, the world is changing, and the young are the ones who see what’s happening.
Time magazine must be gratified to know that their 2019 Person of the Year is a homicidal, deceitful hypocrite and puppet.
How is she a puppet?
Without a script, the girl can’t put two sentences together, as you can see for yourself in the video below.
One would think that, after making countless speeches, including her scold at the UN Climate Action Summit, she could answer the reporter’s simple question of what message she’s telling the world.
How is she homicidal?
On her way home from the UN climate summit in Madrid, Thunberg made a stop in Turin, Italy on December 13, 2019, where she addressed the crowd at a Fridays for Future protest. This is what Time‘s Person of the Year said to the cheering crowd:
“World leaders are still trying to run away from their responsibilities but we have to make sure they cannot do that. We will make sure that we put them against the wall and they will have to do their job to protect our futures.”
Putting someone against the wall is a death threat to execute by firing squad.
Two days later, Thunberg tweeted a “clarification,” claiming that the phrase has a different meaning in her native language Swedish: (BBC)
“Yesterday I said we must hold our leaders accountable and unfortunately said ‘put them against the wall’. That’s Swenglish: ‘att ställa någon mot väggen’ (to put someone against the wall) means to hold someone accountable. Of course I apologise if anyone misunderstood this. I cannot enough express the fact that I – as well as the entire school strike movement – are against any possible form of violence. It goes without saying but I say it anyway.”
How is she a deceitful hypocrite?
To “save” the environment, Thunberg eschews flying by plane to travel by yacht and train instead.
On December 14, 2019, she tweeted a pic of herself looking forlorn, sitting on the floor of a German railroad station with her luggage piled in a heap next to her, with the plaintiff message that she’s “finally” on her way home, “traveling on overcrowded trains through Germany.”
It turns out Thunberg conveniently neglected to inform her Twitter followers that she was traveling in comfort by First Class, nor is the German rail overcrowded like trains in India (see below).
Below is a rebuttal from the German Rail in response to her sympathy-inducing tweet: “It would have been nice had you acknowledged how well and competently our team treated you in your First Class seat.”
Founded 12-23-2009. Burned down by WordPress 8-15-2018 with 63M hits. Resurrected 8-23-2018. DDOS attacks began 11-10-2018. Massive Spam attacks on 12-3-2018.
en
