Category Archives: Insanity

Austrian court overturns Muslim refugee’s conviction for raping 10 y.o. boy because court didn’t prove man knew boy was saying no

Austria, like Germany and other West European countries, is determined to commit suicide.

The Supreme Court of Austria overturned the conviction of 20-year-old Iraqi refugee Amir A. for raping a 10-year-old boy at a swimming pool, because a lower court didn’t prove Amir had known the boy was saying no to the sodomy.

In December 2015, former Iraqi taxi-driver Amir A. Amir was traveling with a government-appointed 15-year-old helper and translator who was supposed to teach Amir how to “integrate” into life in Vienna.

At the Theresienbad pool in Vienna, Austria, Amir dragged a 10-year-old boy into the changing room, locked the door, and violently raped the boy.

The boy, who is known by only his first name Goran, told a lifeguard he had been attacked, and the police were called. Police found Amir in the swimming pool  playing on the diving board as if nothing had happened.

Goran suffered severe internal injuries and was rushed to a children’s hospital. He has had post-traumatic stress disorder ever since. The boy’s mother, who herself is a Serbian refugee, said her son has severe panic attacks, “screams and cries” and is often frightened,” and can only sleep with the help of medication.

Kronen Zeitung daily reported that confessing to the rape in an interview with police officers, Amir admitted he knew that “such acts were forbidden in any country of the world” but that it was a “sexual emergency” because he had not had sex for four months.

In June 2016, a court found Amir guilty of grave sexual assault and rape of a minor and was sentenced to six years in jail.
Prosecutors described the boy as suffering “profound despair.” The boy’s family was awarded €4,730 (US$5,150) in compensation.

On October 20, 2016, despite Chief Justice Thomas Philipp calling Amir’s verdict “watertight,” Austria’s Supreme Court overturned the verdict, acceding to the defense lawyer’s claim that the lower court had not done enough to prove that Amir indeed had acted against the will of the boy — that Amir knew at the time that the boy was saying no.

Note: What this implies is that the Austrian Supreme Court thinks it’s okay for an adult male to sodomize a boy so long as the boy “consents,” which of course is de facto legalization of pedophilia. As the saying goes: “Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.” Before Austria (and West Europe) began committing suicide via Muslim “migrants,” they had already destroyed their souls.

The new trial is likely to take place in 2017, until which time Amir will remain in custody.

There have been a number of reports of similar attacks by “asylum seekers” at swimming pools across Austria and elsewhere in Europe, including:

  • A 37-year-old mother and her four-year-old son were sexually assault in the quiet southern Austrian town of Klagenfurt in March 2016.
  • Authorities in the Austrian town of Mistelbach issued a temporary pool ban for refugees following a sexual assault by a “dark-skinned’ man on a 13-year-old girl in June 2016.  According to Austrian newspaper Kronen Zeitung, a young man followed the girl into the women’s changing room, where he forced her to perform oral sex. The attacker fled when the girl resisted and started shouting.

Sources: Daily Mail, RT

According to its website, Austria’s Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof) is the country’s “highest court in civil and criminal matters.” It has 60 members – a President, two Vice Presidents, presiding justices of panels (referred to as Senatspräsidenten and Senatspräsidentinnen) and other justices (called Hofräte or Hofrätinnen).

On criminal matters, the contact person is:

Hofrätin (or Justice) of the Supreme Court of Justice
Dr. Helene Bachner-Foregger
Oberster Gerichtshof
Schmerlingplatz 11
A-1011 Wien
Telephone: +43 1 52152 3848 (or 3315)
Fax: +43 1 52152 3710

See also:


U.S. breaks off talks with Russia, as Russians prepare for war with massive civil defense drill

While Americans are transfixed by the the Brangelina divorce and Kim Kardashian’s robbery hoax, U.S.-Russian relations rapidly are deteriorating to a point that war is no longer an alarmist fantasy.

Below is a quick look at what has happened and is happening, with embedded links for your perusal. You will see that it is the Obama administration who is being hostile and provocative.

On September 17, 2016, the U.S. coalition bombed Syrian government troops fighting the Islamic State near the city of Deir Ezzor, killing more than 80 and wounding over 100. The U.S. called it an “accident”; Russia said the U.S. is intentionally aiding the Islamic State/ISIS. (The Free Thought Project)

• On September 28, 2016, U.S. State Department spokesman John Kirby issued a veiled threat to Moscow — of terror attacks on Russian cities and shoot-downs of Russian jets if Vladimir Putin continues his fight against ISIS in Syria. Kirby told reporters in a press briefing that “Extremist groups will continue to exploit the vacuums that are there in Syria to expand their operations, which could include attacks against Russian interests, perhaps even Russian cities. Russia will continue to send troops home in body bags, and will continue to lose resources, perhaps even aircraft,” adding that if the war in Syria continues “more Russian lives will be lost, more Russian aircraft will be shot down.”

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova took the remarks as a thinly veiled threat. In a Facebook post, Zakharova asks: “And those [acts of terrorism] will be perpetrated by ‘moderate’ [Syrian opposition groups]? Just the ones that Washington has been unable to separate from Al-Nusra for as long as six months? Don’t you think that such ventriloquism about ‘body bags,’ ‘terrorist attacks in Russian cities’ and ‘loss of aircraft,’ sounds more like a ‘get ’em’ command, rather than a diplomatic comment?”

Al-Nusra is an Al-Qaeda offshoot. An Al-Nusra unit commander recently revealed that “The Americans are on our side” and that Al-Nusra had been given TOW missiles and other weapons “directly” from the U.S. and its allies. (InfoWars)

Yesterday, October 3, after threatening for almost a week to end the nearly 6 years of negotiations with Russia on the Syrian peace process, the Obama administration unilaterally broke off all talks with Moscow. White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters that there is “nothing more for the US and Russia to talk about” in Syria.

• Also yesterday, Oct. 3, Russia suspended participation in a program for disposing of plutonium from decommissioned nuclear warheads. Russian officials gave as the explanation “the radical change in the environment, a threat to strategic stability posed by the hostile actions of the US against Russia, and the inability of the US to deliver on the obligation to dispose of excessive weapons plutonium under international treaties.” (ZeroHedge)

Today, Oct. 4, Russia begins a massive 4-day “All-Russian civil defense drill”. As described by the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense:

  • The drill involves federal and regional executive authorities, local governments and organizations in all constituent territories of Russia.
  • Altogether, more than 40 million people, 200,000 specialists of emergency rescue divisions, and about 50,000 units of equipment will participate in in the drill.
  • The main goal of the drill is to practice organization of management during civil defense events and emergency and fire management, to check preparedness of management bodies and forces of civil defense on all levels to respond to natural and man-made disasters and to take civil defense measures.
  • The drill will rehearse radiation, chemical and biological protection of the personnel and population during emergencies. Response units will deploy radiation, chemical and biological monitoring centers and sanitation posts at the emergency areas, while laboratory control networks are going to be put on standby.

• InfoWars Alex Jones has been puzzled by why the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have been painting Jones and Donald Trump — who wants peace with Russia — as Putin’s puppets. In the video below, Jones has an “Aha!” epiphany.

Beginning at the 2:31 mark, Jones said:

“I was thinking, why am I so troubled by them going on MSNBC and CNN putting my picture up there with Putin’s, with Trump’s, saying that we’re Russian agents and we got our orders from Putin and he’s our godfather. I was thinking it’s ridiculous, it’s made up, it’s not true. That’s just another sovereign nation trying to get out from under globalism. […] And then it clicks. […] Oh my God, they really are going to war with Russia, and anyone that doesn’t go along with the war is a Russian agent, because none of this makes sense and is comical unless you know you’re going for broke and you don’t care. That’s why all the elites are buying bunkers and leaving the United States. It may not be this year or next year, but […] World War III with the Russians is set in the next 4 to 5 years, and the globalists want to entice the Russians to attack — a first strike.”

On August 31, 2016, Hillary Clinton threatened Russia with war. Accusing Russia of “hacking into the Democratic National Committee and even some state election systems,” she said:

“So we’ve got to step up our game, make sure we are well defended and able to take the fight to those who go after us. As President, I will make it clear that United States will treat cyber attacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses.

• In May 2016, The Saker wrote that Russia is preparing for World War III:

The Russians all see that the US power is on the decline and that the dollar will, sooner or later, gradually or suddenly, lose its role as the main reserve and exchange currency on the planet (this process has already begun). Simply put – unless the US finds a way to dramatically change the current international dynamic the AngloZionist Empire will collapse. The Russians believe that what the Americans are doing is, at best, to use tensions with Russia to revive a dormant Cold War v2 and, at worst, to actually start a real shooting war in Europe. […]

So let us now examine the Russian reaction to Empire’s stance.

First, the Russians want to make darn sure that the Americans do not give in to the illusion that a full-scale war in Europe would be like WWII which saw the US homeland only suffer a few, tiny, almost symbolic, attacks by the enemy. Since a full scale war in Europe would threaten the very existence of the Russian state and nation, the Russians are now taking measures to make darn sure that, should that happen, the US would pay an immense price for such an attack.

Second, the Russians are now evidently assuming that a conventional threat from the West might materialize in the foreseeable future. They are therefore taking the measures needed to counter that conventional threat.

Third, since the USA appears to be dead set into deploying an anti-ballistic missile system not only in Europe, but also in the Far East, the Russians are taking the measures to both defeat and bypass this system.

The Russian effort is a vast and a complex one, and it covers almost every aspect of Russian force planning, but there are four examples which, I think, best illustrate the Russian determination not to allow a 22 June 1941 to happen again:

  • The re-creation of the First Guards Tank Army (in progress)
  • The deployment of the Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system (done)
  • The deployment of the Sarmat ICBM (in progress)
  • The deployment of the Status-6 strategic torpedo (in progress) […]

So sometimes things have to be said directly and unambiguously: western politicians better not believe in their own imperial hubris. So far, all their threats have achieved is that the Russians have responded with a many but futile verbal protests and a full-scale program to prepare Russia for WWIII.

As I have written many times, Russians are very afraid of war and they will go out of their way to avoid it. But they are also ready for war. This is a uniquely Russian cultural feature which the West has misread an innumerable number of time over the past 1000 years or so. Over and over again have the Europeans attacked Russia only to find themselves into a fight they would never have imagined, even in their worst nightmares. This is why the Russians like to say that “Russia never starts wars, she only ends them”. […]

If the AngloZionist ‘deep state’ is really delusional enough to trigger a war with Russia, in Europe or elsewhere, the narcissistic and hedonistic West, drunk on its own propaganda and hubris, will discover a level of violence and warfare it cannot even imagine and if that only affected those responsible for these reckless and suicidal policies it would be great. But the problem is, of course, that many millions of us, simple, regular people, will suffer and die as a consequence of our collective failure to prevent that outcome. I hope and pray that my repeated warnings will at least contribute to what I hope is a growing realization that this folly has to be immediately stopped and that sanity must return to politics.

• On June 23, 2016, Reuters reports that:

Russia is likely to deploy advanced nuclear-capable missiles in its European exclave of Kaliningrad by 2019, casting the move as a reply to a U.S.-backed missile shield, and may one day put them in Crimea too, sources close to its military predict. That would fuel what is already the worst standoff between Russia and the West since the Cold War and put a swathe of territory in NATO members Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia in the cross-hairs.”

The nuke-capable missiles are called the Iskander, the Persian name for Alexander the Great.

See also:


Insanity of free tampons for men’s restrooms spreads to Cornell U.

Earlier this month, Brown University’s student association distributed free tampons and sanitary pads to restrooms across the campus, including men’s restrooms because, as student body president Viet Nguyen put it, “not all people who menstruate are women.”

The insanity is contagious: It has now enveloped another Ivy League institution — Cornell University.


Laura Gunderson reports for the conservative student newspaper The Cornell Review (via Campus Reform), Sept. 29, 2016, that by a majority of 78.6%, 3,034 voting Cornell students passed a student-sponsored #FreetheTampon referendum to provide free tampons and pads in all Cornell bathrooms, regardless of gender.

The reasoning behind Cornell’s insanity is the same as Brown’s — not all people who menstruate are women, when accounting for so-called “transgenders”.

In addition to voting, students also posted pro and con statements about the initiative on the Cornell Assemblies Elections page:

  • Many of those who voted “yes” made claims along the lines of, “this is a basic human right, like water or shelter,” and that it’s “ridiculous” and “insane” that they aren’t free already. Many noted that condoms are freely available at the campus health center, so tampons should be, too.
  • Those who voted against the referendum expressed concern over the potential financial burden the project would create and lack of planning, as well as the likely waste of the products, especially in the men’s bathrooms, considering that less than 1% of the population is “transgender”. Like voices crying in the wilderness and in vain, one student argued that “In any situation in which a discussion is being had about a given institution providing some good or service for free, it is essential to first be able to estimate the cost of such a provision prior to implementing it.” Another said that the proposal “seems expensive, and unnecessary.” Yet another student asked, “Having the school subsidize more products leads to an increasing cost for students to attend…where does the subsidizing stop? The school shouldn’t provide other services that aren’t directly relevant or necessary for education.”
  • Some students attempted to stake out a middle ground, asserting that they would be in support of supplying the women’s rooms with free tampons, but not the men’s.

The issue will now be presented to the president of Cornell University for potential implementation, though the details of the proposal are still unclear. No doubt, like Brown University’s administration who applauded the distribution of free tampons, Cornell’s will also cave in to this latest madness in America’s lofty institutions of “higher education”.

By the way, there may be a sort of method to this madness.

After blogging for 7 years, I have come to the sad conclusion that there is no limit to human depravity. On a hunch, I did a search for “tampons as butt plug” and, sure enough, had my suspicions confirmed. See “I Like To Put Tampons In My Ass“. (A word of warning: The disgusting article is for “mature” eyes only, defined as those 18 years or older.)

There is a practical reason why gay men use tampons as butt plugs.

According to WebMD, the vast majority (90%) of men who have sex with men engage in receptive anal intercourse. But anal sex is fraught with health risks. In fact, “anal intercourse is the riskiest form of sexual activity” because the anus is not designed for sexual (or any) penetration:

  1. It lacks natural lubrication, unlike the vagina.
  2. The anus is full of bacteria.
  3. The anus’ skin lining is vulnerable to tearing and the spread of bacteria and infection.

One of the consequences of repetitive anal sex is the weakening of the anal sphincter — a ring-like muscle that tightens after we defecate — making it difficult to hold in feces until the person can get to the toilet. In other words, repetitive anal sex results in fecal incontinence.

Reuters reports on Feb. 4, 2016 that, using national health survey data from 6,150 U.S. adults, a study found that increased risk of incontinence from anal sex is particularly high for men who sex with men. While women who have had anal sex were 50% more likely than their peers to report having fecal incontinence at least once a month, the men’s odds of incontinence are three times that of women.

But, due to the relentless propaganda in popular culture (see, for example, a movie targeted at teens, Kingsman: The Secret Service), the practice of anal sex is increasing even among heterosexuals. According to a recent study led by Dr. Alayne Markland of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, as many of 37% of women reported trying anal intercourse at least once.


Muslim ‘migrants’ have transformed the city of Paris into a garbage dump

Gone is our antiquated image of Paris, France as an elegant, civilized city.

Here’s a video showing how the Muslim “migrant” invasion has transformed the French capital into a literal garbage dump, with men lounging on mattresses on streets choked with litter and garbage. I recommend you watch the video in full screen to get the maximum impact.

Notice that the vagrants are all men, and not just men, but young, able-bodied, military-age males. Where are the pore Muslim women and children of the media’s propaganda?

Here’s another video — of a Muslim riot in Paris:

Meanwhile, tourism in France has plummeted. In August 2016, the French government announced that the number of tourists in the country has fallen by 7% since January. Minister of Foreign Affairs and Tourism Jean-Marc Ayrault acknowledged that “The perception of security risk has had a clear influence on certain travelers, including the wealthiest ones or those from Asia.”

While all of France is affected by the drop in tourist numbers, Paris and Ile-de-France and have been hit particularly hard. The tourism sector in Ile-de-France has lost a billion Euros in sales since January, according to a report of the Regional Tourism Committee (RTC).

But France’s socialist president François Hollande, in a speech on September 8, 2016, defended Muslims and called on his country to be “tolerant” and “embrace” Islam.

H/t FOTM‘s josephbc69


German police tell women to wear sneakers so they can outrun Muslim ‘refugees’

Muslim refugees destroy

More insanity from EU governments.

Instead of doing the sensible thing, which is to stem the tide of Muslim so-called “refugees” and “migrants” into their countries, EU governments resort to silly methods to prevent the sexual molestation of their women, such as:

The German federal police have come up with another brilliant idea — that women ditch high heels for sneakers so that they can outrun “asylum seekers”.

The German-language Freie Zeitan Deutschland reports, Sept. 8, 2016, that last year alone, more than a million immigrants from the third world, almost all men, entered Germany. Since then, the number of sexual assaults has “exploded”.

So this is the German police’s advice to women on how to protect themselves against rape by the “asylum seekers”.

Bundeskriminalamt (Federal Criminal Police of Germany) spokesman Markus Koth said women should trust their intuition. If they have an oppressive feeling about it, if they come across a group of men or a situation that poses a risk, they should definitely avoid the situation, be ready to take “detours,” and get help from police officers in the vicinity.

But if, despite all precautions, a woman is attacked by “asylum seekers,” she must defend herself  “with courage and determination” by screaming loudly to alert passersby and ask them to “please call the police”. For example, you can say: “Hey you over there with the glasses in the blue anorak! Please call the police!”

If you are sexually assaulted, call or get on the government website for advice.

Some other tips for women are:

  • Wear sneakers instead of high heels, so you can run away.
  • Don’t be alone, but travel in groups of at least two or three.
  • Avoid alcohol and drugs.
  • If you drink, it’s best to drink from a bottle.
  • Be aware and observant of your surroundings.
  • If you are assaulted, don’t be a victim. Take action by aiming at your attacker’s genitals, joints, eyes, nose, and ears where you can inflict the greatest pain.


Brown University distributes free tampons to men’s rooms because ‘not all people who menstruate are women’

Here’s a WTF for you.

Newsweek reports, Sept. 6, 2016, that students at the East coast’s Ivy League Brown University have something new in many campus bathrooms: free tampons and menstrual pads.

Viet Nguyen, Brown University student body president

Viet Nguyen, Brown University student body president

Brown’s student body president, Viet Nguyen, a senior education major who’s pushed the student-led initiative, will be hand-delivering menstrual products into all nonresidential bathrooms, including men’s rooms, with the help of 20 other students.

Nguyen said, “There’s been a lot of conversation about why pads and tampons are a necessity, not a luxury, but not a lot of action. We wanted to take it into our own hands. Low-income students struggle with having the necessary funding for food, let alone tampons.”

By putting menstrual products in women’s, men’s and gender-inclusive bathrooms, Nguyen’s campaign seeks to highlight what it claims to be an often ignored fact: Not all people who menstruate are women.

Nguyen said, “We wanted to set a tone of trans-inclusivity and not forget that they’re an important part of the population. I’d be naïve to say there won’t be push back. I’ve had questions about why we’re implementing this in male bathrooms as well. It’s an initial confusion, but people generally understand when we explain it.”

The free tampons and pads for “not all people who menstruate are women” are funded by the student-run undergraduate finance board.

Students at Brown aren’t the only ones going back to school this month with unprecedented access to menstrual products.

As of this fall, New York City public schools will provide free tampons and pads in all school buildings with 6th through 12th graders. The move is part of the city’s landmark legislation, passed on July 13, 2016, ensuring free menstrual products in all public schools, shelters and correctional facilities. In July, New York also became the 11th state to eliminate taxes on menstrual products. Advocates hope that New York City’s new law will set a new standard for schools around the country.

A Department of Education spokesperson said, “Students must feel comfortable during their classes so they can focus on learning, and having free, easy access to menstrual products is essential.”

Earlier this year, Inside Higher Ed reported that students at the University of Arizona, Columbia University, Emory College, Reed College, the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, UCLA and Grinnell College, among others, have all advocated for free menstrual products on campus. As Courtney Couillard wrote in the Columbia Spectator, “I can easily find a free condom on Barnard and Columbia’s campuses, but why can’t I find a free tampon in the bathrooms in Hamilton or Milbank? Why does the administration care about my sexual protective rights, but not how I handle my monthly menstrual cycle?”

It turns out “menstrual equity” isn’t confined to schools and universities, but is a new pop culture movement.


Jennifer Weiss-Wolf

Jennifer Weiss-Wolf, an advocate for menstrual equity, said: “Unlike toilet paper, which is provided for free in school restrooms, students are typically on their own to access menstrual supplies. Yet in order to be fully engaged in the classroom, these are as much of a necessity as pencils and paper. This is especially true for younger teens who are more likely to be caught off guard by the arrival of their period and without budgets of their own to buy emergency tampons or pads.”

President of the National Organization for Women (NOW) Terry O’Neill said, “Feminine hygiene products are not a luxury. They’re as essential as toilet paper; just ask anyone who has ever struggled to obtain or afford them. Students’ participation in school should not be hindered by insufficient access to this basic necessity. Universities around the country should follow suit.”

There were so many pop culture moments about menstruation that NPR called 2015 “the year of the period” and Cosmopolitan dubbed it “the year the period went public.”

And what does Brown University’s administration think of the free tampons even in the college’s men’s rooms?

As reported by Sydney Hutchison for Campus Reform, Brian Clark, Brown’s Director of News and Editorial Development, praised the students for their “tremendous initiative” and said the university will look forward to observing the results.

H/t FOTM‘s MomOfIV


French family-of-10 demand a bigger house: Benefits dad rejects 5-bed as ‘too cramped’

The "depressed" Sube family...

The “depressed” Sube family…

From Express UK: Arnold and Jeanne Sube, originally from Cameroon in west Africa, live in a three-bed semi costing the state more than £15,000 a year.  But when Luton council came up with the extra two bedrooms, the couple insisted the house on offer was still not big enough. 

Labour councillor Tom Shaw said: “People have to realise we are in the middle of a national housing crisis.  We have more than 10,000 people on the waiting list and 1,000 in temporary accommodation. “

This family are living in a large three-bed house. We managed to find them a large four-bed house and then a five-bed, which they turned down.  We can’t be any more sympathetic. We can’t just magic the property people want out of thin air.”

A five-bedroom, tax-payer provided home is just too small

A five-bedroom, tax-payer provided home is just too small

Michael Garrett, Tory leader on the council, added: “There are not many five-bedroom council houses in Luton and they were lucky to be offered one. I haven’t a lot of sympathy for them.”

Student Mr. Sube, 33, moved his family to Britain from Paris four years ago. He has children aged from three months to 16. The oldest is Mejane, followed by Fabian and Analia, both 13, ten-year-old Prosper, nine-year old Dylan, six-year-old twins Sharon and Stacy and the youngest, Mary.

They live in Bletchley, Beds, in a home that boasts a large flat-screen TV with Sky HD, plus a TV and X-Box console in the children’s rooms. 

The larger home offered to them is in nearby Luton. Mr. Sube, who studies mental health nursing at the University of Bedfordshire, rejected it because there “wasn’t space for the things of ten people”. 

He added: “Me and my family have been neglected. We are in a three-bedroom house. It’s so cramped and the conditions are terrible.  The council is trying to make things hard for us. My wife is a full-time mother and I am a student. “They’re just making excuses. We need a five or six-bedroom house with double rooms to comfortably fit in.

“We have developed depression, anxiety, which we were on medication for. The area is the worst I have lived in. This is the worst house.” 

Before their present home the family were put up in a hotel for four months and then given a five-bed home but they were evicted. 

A Luton Borough Council spokesman said: “We managed to find Mr. and Mrs. Sube affordable housing large enough to house them and their children.  If declined without, what we judge, good reason, then we will offer the property to another family.”