Category Archives: Electoral College

The majority of Americans believe Russian hacking of the presidential election did not change the result

blame-the-russians

Maybe that’s because there’s still no definitive proof that Russia was behind hacking the DNC emails, which exposed the democrats’ and state run media’s attempt to get Hillary elected. Better luck next time.

From Daily Mail: Most Americans think Donald Trump would have still won the election regardless of information leaks that came out of Russia’s alleged hacking, a poll reported.

In the study, 58 per cent thought the outcome of the U.S. presidential elections would have remained the same, despite the hacking of files from the Democratic National Convention.

Americans thought ‘regardless of the information released as a result of Russian hacking’ Trump would still have won the election, according to a poll conducted by CNN and ORC.

A minority of 40 per cent of people said the information leak was damaging enough to change voter’s minds. Wikileaks published thousands of emails and documents pertaining to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the DNC, in June 2016.

CIA officials concluded that Russia was involved and the leaks were intended to prevent Clinton from winning the presidency.  Even Trump admitted that he believed Putin and his government were behind the intelligence (since when are DNC emails considered “intelligence?”) scandal and said in a press conference that he ‘thought it was Russia’.

The senate announced last week that an intelligence panel was investigating Russia’s alleged hacking and the country’s ties with the political campaigns.

Despite the major security breach, most Americans think the U.S. should seek to improve relations with Russia, instead of taking actions against the foreign government, according to the study.

Of those polled, 56 per cent said it was ‘more important that the U.S. continue efforts to improve relations with Russia’ while 41 per cent said America should ‘take strong diplomatic and economic steps against Russia in response’.

DCG

Advertisements

4 reasons why you shouldn’t believe the Obama FBI-DHS report on Russian hacking

The “Russia intervened in 2016 election to favor Trump” conspiracy theory was the Democrats’ last-ditch effort to subvert the election.

The Washington Post led the way of the MSM’s propaganda, claiming that a “secret” CIA report named the Russian government as having:

  1. Hacked into the emails of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman John Podesta, as well as then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unsecured and unlawful private email server.
  2. Giving those hacked emails to agents, who in turn,
  3. Provided them to WikiLeaks to publish online — to damaging effects on Hillary’s campaign.

More than that, relying on a shadowy, anonymous, newly-founded website PropOrNot, the Washington Post named 200 Alternative Media sites as Russia’s witting or unwitting agents of disinformation and “fake news,” including Wikipedia, Drudge Report, as well as small humble blogs like Fellowship of the Minds.

spy-vs-spy

The problem is we are simply to put our trust in the Washington Post and other media accounts of this “secret” CIA report, when the MSM violated their own journalist ethics by making no secret of their all-out partiality for Hillary. See, for example:

Adding to our skepticism is that a careful reading of the Washington Post‘s article shows that the “secret” CIA report doesn’t actually make those claims (see “Fake News: Washington Post’s CIA report that Russia intervened in elections to help Trump“). Then there are the credible voices that insist it wasn’t Russia:

Despite the concerted efforts of the Obama administration and the complicit MSM, a Morning Consult poll in late December found that by a whopping 71% majority, the American people don’t buy Obama’s “Russia as bogeyman” conspiracy theory.

Nor did the Electoral College. On November 8, Trump was elected President by a landslide Electoral College margin of 306 to Hillary Clinton’s 232. On December 19 when the Electors formally voted, ironically the faithless electors turned out to be Democrats: the final Electoral College vote was 304 Trump to 224 Clinton.

On December 29, 2016, on the basis of a vague “secret” CIA report, the Obama administration risked war with Russia by expelling 35 Russian diplomats and closing down two Russian consulates. Thankfully, not being insane, Russian President Putin prudently refused to retaliate in kind. And so, World War III is averted — for now.

DHS-FBI Report on Russian Hacking

That same day, December 29, 2016, the Obama Administration finally released a 13-page joint DHS-FBI report on Russian hacking GRIZZLY STEPPE – Russian Malicious Cyber Activity. More than half of the 13-page report isn’t even about hacking, but consists of a list of suggestions for cyber security and preventive measures.

Note: “Grizzly Steppe” is the Obama administration’s code-name for what the administration calls Russia’s “malicious cyber activity”.

Below is the summary of the Grizzly Steppe report:

“This Joint Analysis Report (JAR) is the result of analytic efforts between the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This document provides technical details regarding the tools and infrastructure used by the Russian civilian and military intelligence Services (RIS) to compromise and exploit networks and endpoints associated with the U.S. election, as well as a range of U.S. Government, political, and private sector entities. The U.S. Government is referring to this malicious cyber activity by RIS as GRIZZLY STEPPE.
Previous JARs have not attributed malicious cyber activity to specific countries or threat actors. However, public attribution of these activities to RIS is supported by technical indicators from the U.S. Intelligence Community, DHS, FBI, the private sector, and other entities. This determination expands upon the Joint Statement released October 7, 2016, from the Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security.
This activity by RIS is part of an ongoing campaign of cyber-enabled operations directed at the U.S. government and its citizens. These cyber operations have included spearphishing campaigns targeting government organizations, critical infrastructure entities, think tanks, universities, political organizations, and corporations leading to the theft of information. In foreign countries, RIS actors conducted damaging and/or disruptive cyber-attacks, including attacks on critical infrastructure
networks.
In some cases, RIS actors masqueraded as third parties, hiding behind false online personas designed to cause the victim to misattribute the source of the attack. This JAR provides technical indicators related to many of these operations, recommended mitigations, suggested actions to take in response to the indicators provided, and information on how to report such incidents to the U.S. Government.”

The report then proceeds to identify two specific Russian “actors” who hacked into the Democratic Party’s emails on two separate occasions — summer of 2015 and spring of 2016:

  1. APT29: “The first actor group, known as Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) 29, entered into the party’s systems in summer 2015″
  2. APT28: A second Russian hacker(s), “known as APT28, entered in spring 2016.”

In both instances, the alleged Russian hackers gained entrance into Democrat emails via spearphishing.

Note: Phishing is a hacker’s attempt to obtain sensitive information such as usernames, passwords, and credit card details by disguising as a trustworthy entity in an electronic communication. We’ve all received phish emails, wherein we are given some reason (e.g., your email or bank account has been breached) and asked to click on a URL, ostensibly the URL of your account, in order to verify you’re the owner of the account. The URL, of course, is bogus — a trap to get you, if you are stupid enough, to enter your username and password. The phishing scammer then uses your username and password to hack into your account.

In the words of the Grizzly Steppe report:

In summer 2015, an APT29 spearphishing campaign directed emails containing a malicious link to over 1,000 recipients, including multiple U.S. Government victims. APT29 used legitimate domains, to include domains associated with U.S. organizations and educational institutions, to host malware and send spearphishing emails. In the course of that campaign, APT29 successfully compromised a U.S. political party. At least one targeted individual activated links to malware hosted on operational infrastructure of opened attachments containing malware. APT29 delivered malware to the political party’s systems, established persistence, escalated privileges, enumerated active directory accounts, and exfiltrated email from several accounts through encrypted connections back through operational infrastructure.

In spring 2016, APT28 compromised the same political party, again via targeted spearphishing. This time, the spearphishing email tricked recipients into changing their passwords through a fake webmail domain hosted on APT28 operational infrastructure. Using the harvested credentials, APT28 was able to gain access and steal content, likely leading to the exfiltration of information from multiple senior party members.

The report claims that on both occasions — summer 2015 and spring 2016 — “The U.S. Government assesses that information was leaked to the press and publicly disclosed.”

In other words, the email accounts of the DNC, Hillary Clinton and John Podesta were hacked because these Democrats were so stupid as to fall for phishing scams that only morons and those with senile dementia fall for. Let that idea sink in . . . .

John Podesta, in particular, is so careless with his email account that he made the job of hackers ridiculously easy by having “jpodesta” as his username and the word “p@sswOrd” as his password, as indicated in an email sent to him by his Special Assistant Eryn Sepp on Feb. 19, 2015, which WikiLeaks published:

john-podestas-username-and-password

Reasons why Grizzly Steppe report is not credible

(1) The report is prefaced by a curious Disclaimer, which says;

“This report is provided ‘as is’ for informational purposes only. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within.

(2) Cybersecurity expert John McAfee (yes, that John McAfee, as in the McAfee anti-virus software you use to protect your computer from viruses and malware), told Larry King in an RT America interview that the report is a ploy to “manipulate our opinions”:

“When the FBI or when any other agency says the Russians did it or the Chinese did something or the Iranians did something – that’s a fallacy. Any hacker capable of breaking into something is extraordinarily capable of hiding their tracks. If I were the Chinese and I wanted to make it look like the Russians did it I would use Russian language within the code. I would use Russian techniques of breaking into organizations so there is simply no way to assign a source for any attack – this is a fallacy. This is what the FBI and other agencies want us to believe so that they can manipulate our opinions, but I can promise you – if it looks like the Russians did it, then I can guarantee you it was not the Russians.

You can watch and hear McAfee for yourself by going to the RT video on Express.

McAfee also said it’s no longer possible to keep “secrets” in the online landscape and that other countries already have access to U.S. classified information:

“Our government wants to say ‘well we have secrets we must protect’ – there are no secrets anymore. If the US Government believes the Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians do not already have all of our secrets because of their hacking technologies, then our government is deluding itself.”

Furthermore, McAfee believes that the U.S. government itself is the hacker — of “influential” Americans:

“I have no privacy and neither do you, Larry. If you think that just because you’re not a political activist or not speaking out against a government agency that they may not be looking into your life – I know that they are. Why? You are an important person, you influence millions of Americans, so of course, they want to know what you’re thinking, what you’re doing, who your friends are and what you’re saying – and I’m not being paranoid – this is just that facts of life as it exists today.”

(3) Most importantly, other than naming the hackers as APT 29 and APT 28 and describing how they hacked into Democrat emails (via phishing), the report does not actually tell us how the Obama administration knows the hacks had been directed by the Russian government, or that the hackers’ motive was to influence the election in favor of Trump. This is pointed out by Bill Binney, a 36-year executive of the National Security Agency (NSA) who is widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency and its best-ever analyst and code-breaker who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information. According to Binney:

“I expected to see the IP’s or other signatures of APTs 28/29 [the entities which the U.S. claims hacked the Democratic emails] and where they were located and how/when the data got transferred to them from DNC/HRC [i.e. Hillary Rodham Clinton]/etc. They seem to have been following APT 28/29 since at least 2015, so, where are they?

Further, once we see the data being transferred to them, when and how did they transfer that data to Wikileaks? This would be evidence of trying to influence our election by getting the truth of our corrupt system out. […]

In addition, since Wikileaks is (and has been) a cast iron target for NSA/GCHQ/etc for a number of years there should be no excuse for them missing data going to any one associated with Wikileaks.”

(4) Even Rolling Stones magazine, which endorsed Hillary Clinton for President, is unconvinced. As the magazine’s contributing editor Matt Taibbi correctly points out:

“But this could also just be a cynical ass-covering campaign, by a Democratic Party that has seemed keen to deflect attention from its own electoral failures.

The outgoing Democrats could just be using an over-interpreted intelligence ‘assessment’ to delegitimize the incoming Trump administration [….]

We just don’t know, which is the problem.

[…] Not only do governments lie, they won’t hesitate to burn news agencies. In a desperate moment, they’ll use any sucker they can find to get a point across. […] Which makes it surprising we’re not trying harder to avoid getting fooled again.”

When even a left-wing magazine that had endorsed Hillary Clinton for President admits that “we just don’t know” after reading the DHS-FBI Grizzly Steppe report on Russia’s alleged hacking of Democrat emails, one would have to be really gullible to place any confidence in the report.

Dog eyeroll

Clearly the Democrats’ emails had been hacked, then given to WikiLeaks to publish. Obama wants you to believe the culprits are the Russian government. But that’s really not the point, is it?

In the end, what is important are the emails themselves and what they reveal:

  • The DNC was Hillary’s tool and actively sabotaged and undermined Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign.
  • Hillary Clinton’s lies, corruption, venality, and contempt for the “little people” whom she would rule as president.
  • John Podesta’s satanic activities.

It is the contents of those emails, not who hacked the emails, which helped to defeat Hillary and elect Donald Trump.

Let’s say you are about to get married. A friend got hold of information that your fiancé is cheating on you, and gave that information to you, with which you called off the wedding. Would it make any sense for you to heap your fury on the friend, instead of on your faithless fiancé?

What the Obama administration is doing is exactly the same. They would have you blame the messenger who provided you with the critical information you should have for the 2016 presidential election.

We now know Democrat bigwigs — the DNC, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta — are really stupid, so stupid as to fall for phishing scams. Don’t allow them to think you are stupid too.

~Eowyn

Another Democrat FAIL: 71% of Americans don’t believe Russia hacked election

russia-hacked-2016-election

The “Russia intervened in 2016 election to favor Trump” conspiracy theory was the Democrats’ last-ditch effort to subvert the election by convincing the Electoral College to vote Hillary Clinton for the presidency.

Thankfully, instead of GOP electors going rogue by voting for Hillary, the faithless electors turned out to be Democrats who ditched Hillary. See “Trump officially voted President!”.

Now, a new Morning Consult/Politico poll finds that the American people don’t buy the “Russia as bogeyman” lie either, which is yet another indicator of the failure of the mainstream media’s propaganda.

russians-did-it

According to the poll:

  • 46% of respondents said the U.S. can’t be sure who is primarily responsible for the hacking because tracing cyberattacks is complicated and because the CIA had been wrong about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
  • 25% of respondents said they didn’t know or had no opinion.
  • That means a whopping 71% of respondents (46% + 25%) do not believe the accusation of Obama administration and the MSM (led by “fake news” Washington Post) that Russia had intervened in the 2016 presidential election by hacking and providing Democrat emails to WikiLeaks.
  • Only 29% of respondents in the poll said there was “near certainty” that Russia is responsible for hacking and that intelligence agencies had used advanced techniques to determine that the former Cold War adversary is responsible.

As usual, Democrats — being less informed and less intelligent — are more likely to believe in the “Russian hack” lie. (See “Republicans are better informed, more open-minded and tolerant than Democrats“)

As many as 50% of Democrats believe in the lie; in contrast, only 14% of Republicans are that stupid.

morning-consult-poll-on-russia-hacking-election

See also:

H/t FOTM’s Longknife 21 for the “Russians pooped in the hallway” pic!

~Eowyn

WaPo columnist says Trump ‘needs to get over his victory’

Yesterday, the Electoral College officially voted Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States of America.

Since his victory in the November 8 presidential election, Trump has flown to various cities, at his own expense, thanks his supporters in rallies attended by tens of thousands of ordinary Americans.

That is rubbing Ruth Marcus the wrong way. She’s a columnist for the Washington Post — that piece of rag which specializes in fake news. (See “Fake News: Washington Post’s CIA report that Russia intervened in elections to help Trump” and “CIA: Washington Post lied about a secret CIA report that Russia intervened in 2016 election”.)

ruth-marcus

In her Dec. 16 column, “Trump needs to get over his victory,” Marcus writes:

President-elect Donald Trump needs to heal, not revel. That is, he must work on healing the divided country he is about to lead, not continue to revel in his victory with a round of thank-you rallies.

Instead, we see: Trump griping about the political correctness of being named “person of the year.” Quieting, but not really, chants of “lock her up.” Revving up the crowd against the “very dishonest” media. Thanking African Americans who “didn’t come out to vote.” Jabbing at the “foolish” White House press secretary for daring to point out that candidate Trump had encouraged Russian hacking.

Crybaby, the Trump supporters will tweet. He won, get over it. But the president-elect is the one who seems to be having a hard time getting over it, or rising above, or inhabiting the responsibility — the majesty — of his new role. […]

Dismiss this as the griping of obsolescent elites, but regular Americans are similarly apprehensive. Majorities in a Pew Research Center poll say Trump is reckless (65 percent) and has poor judgment (62 percent). More Americans (38 percent) believe he will be a poor or terrible president than are confident (35 percent) he will be a good or great one. Crowds at Trump rallies cheer, but the country worries.

In his finest post-election moment, Trump, echoing Lincoln, vowed on election night to “bind the wounds of division.” To acknowledge citizens’ concerns and adjust accordingly is an essential, if unlikely, first step — so far missing from the president-elect’s repertoire.

Blah, blah, blah.

Go suck a lemon, Ruth Marcus!

~Eowyn

Trump officially voted President!

A few minutes ago, the Electoral College votes for Donald Trump went over the 270 needed to a total of 304 (vs. 224 for Hillary)!

Donald Trump is officially elected the 45th President of the United States of America.

dancingbanana Carrot Chilli Muffin PurpleBanana Pineapple Strawberry

Despite all the death threats and harassing/intimidating phone calls and emails directed at Republican Electors (Pennsylvanian Electors even had police protection and escort); despite the unprecedented video of idiotic Hollyweirdos, led by Martin Sheen, asking Electors not to vote for Trump; despite murmurs of bribes, the Electors stood firm and voted in accordance with how the residents of their respective states had voted.

Thank you, Electors!

Not a single GOP Elector buckled under the pressure and voted for Hillary, although one voted for Ron Paul (who is not on the ballot), and another for John Kasich. Both are Texas electors.

7 Democrat Electors went rogue by not casting their votes for Hillary as they were supposed to:

  • In Colorado, a Democrat elector tried to vote for John Kasich and was replaced by an alternate elector, who voted for Hillary because state law requires electors to vote for the winner of the state’s popular vote. (NPR)
  • In Maine, a Democratic elector voted for Bernie Sanders instead of Clinton. He was ruled “out of order,” and he voted for Clinton in a second vote.
  • In Minnesota, Muhammad Abdurrahman, a former Bernie Sanders delegate to the Democratic National Convention, attempted to vote for no candidate. His vote was declared invalid and an alternate elector was appointed, enabling the state to go ahead and deliver its 10 electoral votes for Hillary Clinton. (The Hill)
  • In Washington, while 8 of the state’s 12 electors voted for Clinton, 4 electors went rogue, 2 of whom voted for Colin Powell, and 2 for Faith Spotted Eagle — a Native American who has been active in the Dakota pipeline protests. (ZeroHedge)

We can expect more shenanigans from Democrats in the month until inauguration. But their bag of tricks is rapidly depleting, and We The People will expose and call them on their chicanery every step of the way.

Hillary Clinton, a truly evil woman, will never be POTUS!

The countdown begins! Let’s Make America Great Again!

countdown-to-trump-inauguration

~Eowyn

Electoral College vote – Open Thread

270 Electoral College votes are needed to win.

Some time before 6 pm ET, the tally was 304 Trump vs. 224 Clinton.
(Live vote tally here)

Donald Trump is officially the next POTUS!

So far, all of the electors in states who should vote for Trump, did so.

Electors who went rogue are Democrats:

  • In Minnesota, Muhammad Abdurrahman, a former Bernie Sanders delegate to the Democratic National Convention, attempted to vote for no candidate. His vote was declared invalid and an alternate elector was appointed, enabling the state to go ahead and deliver its 10 electoral votes for Hillary Clinton. (The Hill)
  • In Washington, while 8 of the state’s 12 electors voted for Clinton, 4 electors went rogue, 2 of whom voted for Colin Powell, and 2 for Faith Spotted Eagle — a Native American who has been active in the Dakota pipeline protests. (ZeroHedge)

H/t FOTM‘s MomOfIV

~Eowyn

Electoral College meets today: Meeting times & places of GOP Electors

Today, December 19, 2016, America’s Electoral College voters are scheduled to meet in their respective states to cast their votes for President of the United States of America.

Although the Electors are supposed to vote in accordance with the voters of their state, which means if their state voted for Donald Trump, the Electors should also cast their votes for Trump, at least one Republican Elector in Texas has made quite a name for himself by declaring he instead would vote for Hillary Clinton. See “Sole Republican elector who plans to vote against Trump is a 9/11 faker?“.

So it’s a good idea for citizens to keep an eye on what their Electors do by attending their meetings, which are open to the public.

2016-electoral-votes

Here’s a list of GOP electors’ meeting places and times:

Alabama: 12:00 P.M. EST; Alabama State Capitol — Office of the Secretary of State, 600 Dexter Ave., Montgomery, AL 36130

Alaska: 11:00 A.M. AKST; State of Alaska — Library Archives Museum, 395 Whittier Street, Juneau, AK 99801

Arizona: 10:00 A.M. MST; Governor’s Conference Room (second floor), Arizona State Capitol Building, 1700 W. Washington St., Phoenix, AZ 85007

Arkansas: 10:00 A.M. CST; Arkansas State Capitol — Old Supreme Court Room, 500 Woodlane St., Little Rock, AR 72201

Florida: 2:00 P.M. EST; Florida State Capitol — Florida Senate Chamber, 400 S. Monroe St., Tallahassee, FL 39399

Georgia: 12:00 P.M. EST; Georgia State Capitol (exact location unknown), 206 Washington St. SW, Atlanta, GA 30334

Idaho: 12:00 P.M. MST, Idaho State Capitol (exact location unknown), 700 W. Jefferson St., Boise, ID 83702

Indiana: 10:00 A.M. EST; Indiana State Capitol — State House of Representatives Chamber, 200 W. Washington St., Indianapolis, IN 46204

Iowa: No time specified ; Iowa State Capitol (exact location unknown), 1007 E. Grand Ave., Des Moines, IA 50319

Kansas: Somewhere in Topeka at 12:00 P.M. CST (Exact location not specified, nor is it even clear that the meeting would have to take place in the Capitol Building)

Kentucky: 11:30 A.M. CST; Kentucky State Capitol — Supreme Court Room (Room 235), 700 Capitol Avenue, Frankfort, KY 40601

Louisiana: 11:30 A.M. CST; Louisiana State Capitol — Senate Chamber, 900 N. 3rd St., Baton Rouge, LA 70802

Maine**: 2:00 P.M. EST; Maine State House — House Chamber, 100 State House Station, Augusta, ME 04333 (**Trump won 1 of Maine’s 4 electoral votes)

Michigan: 2:00 P.M. EST; Michigan State Capitol — Senate Chamber, 101 N. Capitol Ave., Lansing, MI 48933

Mississippi: 10:00 A.M. EST; Mississippi State Capitol — Room 114, 400 High St., Jackson, MS 39201

Missouri: State law exceedingly unclear, no announcement yet from Secretary of State: http://law.justia.com/codes/missouri/2013/title-ix/chapter-128/

Montana: Montana seems to have recently repealed all laws governing where/when electors must meet: http://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca_toc/13_25_1.htm

Nebraska: No time specified: http://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=32-714  Note: a 2014 law guarantees that all Nebraska electoral votes will be cast for Trump

North Carolina: NC Secretary of State identifies the meeting place as such: “Old Hall of the House of Representatives in the State Capitol in Raleigh at noon”

North Dakota: 1:00 P.M. CST; North Dakota State Capitol — Governor’s Office, 600 E. Boulevard Ave., Bismarck, ND 58505

Ohio: 12:00 P.M. EST; The Ohio Statehouse, 1 Capitol Square, Columbus, OH 43215.

Oklahoma: 10:00 A.M. CST; Governor’s Office (NOT the legislative chamber!), Oklahoma State Capitol, 2300 N. Lincoln Blvd., Room 212, Oklahoma City, OK 73105

Pennsylvania: 12:00 P.M. EST; Pennsylvania State Capitol — Chamber of the House of Representatives, 501 N. 3rd St., Harrisburg, PA 17120.

South Carolina: 11:00 AM EST (Or as SC statute puts it, “eleven in the forenoon”); Office of the Secretary of State (NOT the South Carolina State House), Edgar Brown Building, 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 525, Columbia, SC 29201

South Dakota: 12:00 P.M. CST, South Dakota State Capitol (exact location unknown), 500 E. Capitol Ave., Pierre, SD 57601

Tennessee: No time or exact location specified: http://law.justia.com/codes/tennessee/2010/title-2/chapter-15/2-15-104

Texas: 2:00 P.M. CST; Texas State Capitol — (Exact location not yet known, Secretary of State must announce), 1100 Congress Ave., Austin, TX 78701

Utah: Unclear: looks as though the Lieutenant Governor is in charge for some reason

West Virginia: NO TIME SPECIFIED; Office of the Governor, West Virginia State Capitol, 1900 Kanawha Boulevard, East, Charleston, WV 25305

Wisconsin: 12:00 P.M. CST; Wisconsin State Capitol — Room 412E, 2 E. Main Street, Madison, WI 53703

Wyoming: 12:00 P.M. MST; Office of the Secretary of State (NOT the State Capitol Building), 2020 Carey Avenue, Suite 600, Cheyenne, WY 82002

H/t Michael Tracey of Medium

You can watch the Electoral College vote LIVE here:

H/t FOTM‘s MomOfIV

~Eowyn