Category Archives: war on patriotism

Dopes in DC show their true colors

DC thugs attack refugee from North Korea whose wife and 3 small children were executed when he defected.

Way to go, you ignorant chumps!

This doesn’t help anybody. But these idiots are like are like animals driven by instinct, not reason. No, I take that back; animals do not deserve to be maligned like that. These punks most resemble their father, Satan.

What many don’t know is that DC is half slum.

MAGA

Lord help us to Make America Great Again!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Colbert and Kimmel are Mockers

He mocks proud mockers
but gives grace to the humble. The wise inherit honor,
but fools He holds up to shame.
– Proverbs 3:34-35

These men make their living by mocking conservatives. It’s their bread and butter. They have the right to do this in a nation with the 1st Amendment. But our constitution is not the only authority in play.

All through Psalms and Proverbs are warnings against being or sitting in the seat of the mocker. Such people will be brought down, not by us, or on our timing, but by the Lord, who will judge all things.

 

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

My Favorite News Aggregator Is Down – Hopefully Temporarily

Went to Whatfinger.com and got this…

If we at FOTM hadn’t experienced so many attacks this past year, I would not think anything of this. But at this moment, the shadowy puppeteers are very much shaken up by President DJT, and are potentially more dangerous (if that’s imaginable)

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Peace Cross Case Heads to US Supreme Court – Why Much More Than One Cross Is on the Line

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case about whether a the nearly 100-year-old, cross-shaped war memorial in Maryland known as Peace Cross violates the Constitution because is on government property. The case of the monument, located in the Bladensburg community of Prince George’s County, could impact hundreds of similar monuments nationwide.

First Liberty Institute is defending the cross. One of its lawyers, Jeremy Dys, told CBN News, “This case is very important for a variety of reasons. Because this area of the law is right now – as Justice (Clarence) Thomas has said – in hopeless disarray. And so there’s really needing some clarity for this.”

The legal team  believes this could be the most crucial religious liberty case the Supreme Court handles this term. That’s because if the high court eventually decides this cross has to go, it could affect thousands of other crosses, including crosses on all federal cemeteries such as  the national cometary at Arlington.

But if the justices make a broad ruling favoring the cross and other objects like it, it could put an end to judges and bureaucrats deciding – somewhat haphazardly – if a religious symbol or display is too religious or secular enough to be left alone by secular authorities.

That possibility has opponents of the cross worried about the court setting a precedent that could counter future efforts to eradicate religious symbols–especially Christian symbols– from public display.

The District of Columbia-based American Humanist Association has led the challenge against the monument. The organization and three area residents sued Maryland officials in 2014 in an attempt to have the monument torn down. They say that the cross “discriminates against patriotic soldiers who are not Christian, sending a callous message to non-Christians that Christians are worthy of veneration while they may as well be forgotten.” And they point out that other nearby memorials are smaller and across the street from the cross.

One of the people who brought the original case against the cross – Steven Lowe of the American Humanist Association – told CBN News, “The government on this piece of property is favoring a religion with this huge symbol. When you come across the bridge or approach it from any of the highways, you see nothing but this huge Christian cross.”

Journalist Renee Green spoke with Lowe and other cross opponents for her documentary “Save the Peace Cross.” In it, United Coalition of Reason officer Fred Edwords stated, “It gives the impression of Christianity and nothing else. And it gives the impression of government endorsement of Christianity.”

And Lowe told Green, “The existence of a memorial on public land is not a problem. It is just the use of the Christian cross as part of that memorial that we find contrary to the First Amendment and separation of church and state.”

Edwords added, “It looks for all the world like, ‘Okay, this is either the state of Maryland or the city of Bladensburg endorsing one religion.'”

In the suit against the cross, one atheist said he was traumatized driving by it. Green appears on camera in her documentary to point out that many telephone poles are in the shape of a cross.

“If the plaintiffs win this lawsuit, will all the telephone poles need to be modified?” Green asks, tongue-in-cheek. She adds, “I just hope they’re not traumatized by telephone poles while driving.”

The Peace Cross has drawn the support of Maryland’s governor and senators. Over the summer the state of Maryland filed an amicus brief in support of the petition to the Supreme Court, and Gov. Larry Hogan said the state was “determined to fight all the way to the highest court in the land to keep it standing tall and proud.”

The Peace Cross was completed in 1925, and it honors 49 men from the surrounding county who died in World War I. A plaque on the cross’ base lists the names of those soldiers, and both faces of the cross have a circle with the symbol of the American Legion, the veterans organization that helped raise money to build it.

Today, responsibility for the cross falls to a Maryland parks commission that took over ownership and maintenance of it in 1961 because of traffic safety concerns.

~ Grif

The first amendment/the first enumerated right:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Why Trump Scares The Wicked

President Trump has appealed to Americans with promises to work for justice.

He has the effect of separating people. Hollywood is losing its hive-mind at the successes achieved by Trump. Democrats and some Republicans are likewise distressed. But Conservatives, and even many Liberals, are taking notice of the improvements Trump’s team has brought.

Here’s the divide

If Trump gets to appoint a couple more Constitutionalists to the Supreme Court, we can finally look to the demise of Planned Parenthood. So like the proverb says, justice brings terror to evil doers. Abortion clinics will be closed nation wide, and the horrible satanic sacrifice of innocent babies to the false god Baal will come to an end. Just think of how scared the abortionists are. They are no longer dreaming of fancy cars they can buy with their blood money, but planning their escape routes when justice comes after them for their horrific crimes agains humanity.

Apply the same to Fake News, Entertainment, all the Mockingbird Media, and it’s clear that the likes of CNN are terrified. Their lies are being found out.

Let’s not forget the engines of indoctrination called universities. If common sense and critical thinking take a firm enough hold in America, these educational frauds will shrivel up to nothing, denied both students and patrons.

And in politics we have the entire Bush and Clinton families quaking in their boots. What do you suppose they fear might come to the attention of the American people?

By contrast

Freedom loving people in America have been greatly encouraged. They have renewed hope for a decent economy, righteous appointments to courts all over the country, a renewed respect for Christian principles in our society. Our military is being strengthened, not to promote wars, but to prevent them. The alphabet intelligence agencies are coming under open scrutiny, unearthing long hidden connections to old crimes, like the assassination of JFK, and the false flag used to drag a generation into the Vietnam War, all for the profit of arms manufacturers and bankers.

Joy to the righteous

Many of us are finally seeing daylight and hope after the long dark Obama night. So we are joyful, but we do not gloat. We know it all continues to be based on divine favor, and not on human cleverness.

“If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.” – 2 Chronicles 7:14

“When justice is done, it brings joy to the righteous but terror to evildoers.” – Proverbs 21:15


PEACE

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Kentucky man arrested for pulling gun on couple wearing MAGA hats

It’s a war zone out there.

The Left have declared war on Americans who are patriots. It’s just that the complicit media haven’t told us.

On February 16, 2019, at a Sam’s Club in Bowling Green, Kentucky, a 57-year-old man named James Phillips pulled a gun on Terry Pierce and his wife because of their MAGA (Make America Great Again) hats.

The Pierces were at the checkout line when Phillips gave them the finger.

Mrs. Pierce said to Phillips: “Excuse me. Did you flip us off?”

Phillips went into an obscene tirade and said: “Yes, I did, because of those hats.”

Mr. Pierce moved in front of Phillips and said: “What gives you the right to flip me off? Because of the hat I’m wearing?”

Phillips pulled a gun out, pointed it in Pierce’s face, and said: “This is a good day for you to die.”

Pierce: “Then pull the trigger. You either pull the trigger or put the gun down and face me like a man.”

Phillips started to back away, but said again: “Yeah, this is a good day for you to die.”

Pierce stood his ground. As the two men continued to argue, Phillips backed away and stuck his gun in the backside of his belt.

ABC13 WBKO reports that Pierce said Phillips accused him of assaulting him, but Pearce never touched Phillips.

According to the police report, surveillance video confirms Pierce’s story that he did not put his hands on Phillips. Police say Phillips had a Glock .40 caliber with a round chambered in his back pocket and two additional magazines in another pocket.

Phillips was promptly arrested, charged with “wanton endangerment” and is in the Warren County Regional Jail.

Fox News points out that if this were a conservative pulling a gun, the news would be plastered everywhere. Watch the Fox News video here.

H/t Big Lug

See also:

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

CBS rejected this patriotic ad for 2019 Super Bowl

For the televised broadcast of the 2019 Super Bowl last Sunday, CBS rejected a  patriotic, anti-NFL-kneeling ad, featuring soldiers, first responders, and images of military graves decorated with American flags.

The ad is narrated by Benghazi survivor U.S. Marine Mark Geist:

“Some people think you’re crazy for being loyal, defending the Constitution, standing for the flag. Then I guess I’m crazy. For those who kneel, they fail to understand that they can kneel, that they can protest, that they can despise what I stand for, even hate the truth that I speak, but they can only do that because I am crazy enough. Don’t ask if your loyalty is crazy. Ask if it’s crazy enough.”

But CBS turned down the ad. Watch it, and tell me what’s so wrong about the ad.

The ad’s sponsor is Nine Line Apparel, a veteran-owned clothing company in Savannah, Georgia, with an annual revenue of $25 million. But CBS’s excuse for turning down their 45-second ad is that CBS thinks the company doesn’t have the money to pay for the ad, which is patently absurd.

Paul Bedard reports for the Washington Examiner that Nine Line Apparel CEO Tyler Merritt says CBS’s real reason for rejecting the ad is because CBS didn’t like the ad’s content:

“CBS’s purported reason for rejecting a Super Bowl commercial that extols patriotism is totally out of bounds. Let’s call this what it is: a blatant attempt to censor a message that their politically correct executives find offensive. We urge Americans who believe it’s important to show respect for our flag and national anthem to join us in calling out this offensive bias. It’s time to give a penalty flag to CBS.”

Indeed, Nine Line Apparel is unabashedly patriotic. The company’s “About Us” page reads:

RELENTLESSLY PATRIOTIC SINCE 2012

It’s much more than getting dressed everyday, it’s about being proud of who you are, what you wear, and how you walk through life. We are relentlessly patriotic. We hold no punches, we don’t apologize for our love of country. We are America’s next greatest generation.

In the military, a Nine Line is a medevac request for a soldier that is injured on the battlefield. To soldiers, a Nine Line symbolizes patriotism, hope, and trust in one’s countrymen.

As a life-style brand, Nine Line Apparel aims to reinvigorate the sense of patriotism and national pride that is disappearing daily from our society. Where politics and dissent divide our country, we hope to inspire unity and brotherhood among all Americans as patriots under our common flag.

At its core, Nine Line is a give-back organization, forever striving to be our brother’s keeper, and encouraging others to do the same. We support a multitude of initiatives beyond raising awareness, and financially back organizations that help those in need. From first responders to military charities to disaster relief initiatives, Nine Line is committed to ongoing support of charitable initiatives. No matter the circumstances, we’ve got your six. To learn more about our Foundation, please visit www.ninelinefoundation.org.

What you can do:

  1. Make this story go viral with hashtag #CBSCensorsPatriots.
  2. Patronize Nine Line Apparel. I went on its “On Sale” reduced-price page: The prices are very reasonable. There are jackets with an American flag patch, and t-shirts with the American flag and “Don’t Tread On Me” message.

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Jimmy Kimmel & Alyssa Milano lead vicious attack on triple-amputee veteran Brian Kolfage of border-wall GoFundMe

Brian Kolfage is a triple-amputee Iraq War veteran.

On December 16, 2018, Kolfage created a GoFundMe to raise funds for the US-Mexico border wall. In just a week, he’s raised a phenomenal $16½ million toward the stated goal of $1 billion.

Kolfage and his family are getting vicious hate mail and death threats from leftists. The leaders of the jackals are ABC latenight talkshow host Jimmy Kimmel, has-been actress Alyssa Milano, and the Daily Beast.

Yesterday, Kolfage posted this update on the border wall GoFundMe page:

Attacks on my family-

Just want to let you guys know everything is ok with us. After Jimmy Kimmel and Alyssa Milano came after me personally it triggered an outpouring of attacks. People have been calling for the death of my wife and children; it will not be tolerated. Please do your best to report anything you see like this to the proper authorities.

WE WILL NOT BE DETERRED! KEEP RALLYING!

Cassandra Fairbanks reports for Gateway Pundit, Dec. 23, 2018:

Deranged leftists have been sending triple-amputee veteran Brian Kolfage mountains of abuse after he was trashed by the Daily Beast, Jimmy Kimmel, Alyssa Milano and other high-profile liberals.

The hate mail provided to the Gateway Pundit contains appalling statements such as people asking if his brain was “amputated too,” calling him a “handicapped bitch,” telling him to commit suicide, wishing harm upon his children and mocking him for having lost his limbs while fighting for this nation….

On Thursday, Kimmel used his show to trash the nearly 260,000 people who have donated nearly $16 million to the GoFundMe in less than a week, calling them “dopey people” and saying that they are “dipping into their meth money.”

Dozens of examples of the vitriol and threats were provided to the Gateway Pundit, some of which we are now publishing — unedited.

Below is a sample of the hate mail sent to Kolfage (source: Gateway Pundit):

  • Ralph Cramden <RalphCramden@protonmail.com>: “Really dude? So you’re a far right wing ahole who pushed fake news? WTF is wrong with you? Was your brain amputated too? I don’t know how that blonde c*nt you’re married to stays with you?! A hot piece of ass like that should be screwing a real man.”
  • Walter Ancarrow: “Hi, was one of the limbs you had amputated your brain?”

 

 

 

  • Peter Lopez <peter2rosie@yahoo.com>: “What’s up handicapped bitch just wanted to say I’m happy to see you in that wheel chair and I’m happy to know you get no pussy why do you make it look like your standing up in your photo you dumb fuck you got no legs I LMAO LOOKING LIKE DARTH VADER AND SHIT WELL AT LEAST I CAN HAVE IN MIND YOUR A CRIPPLED BICTH WITH NO LEGS OR ARMS HAHAHAHAHAH”
  • Carlos Lopez <carloslopezmrc@gmail.com>: “All I can say is you are a CLOWN. The loss of your limbs was pre-karma. God knew your were a troll before hand. No pun intended. You are no patirot. Make me upset that your troll a$$ was even accepted in the Military.”
  • Cathy Garcia Cruz <cathysdiary@gmail.com>, Muleshoe, Texas:”You sick n pathetic! No wonder u lost ur limbs in Iraq. Setting up the gofundme for the wall?? I hope someone sets one up to blow the wall up!”

 

  • Janet Trejo: “Piece of shit that’s why you have no legs mothafucker”
  • Jacob Riley: “i hope u lose both of your arms as well.”

 

 

  • Josh Cobean, St. Petersburg, FL: “You’re a disgrace to this country. Delete the GoFundMe and kill yourself. That’s the best way to serve your country at this point.”

 

 

  • Mike <oih234kn235n32@protonmail.com>: “Are you really this fucking dumb? Holy shit that’s fucking embarrassing. Kill yourself you worthless pile of shit.”
  • Alec Giusti: “go fuck yourself and die”
  • Abelitro Cruz: “eat a dick pussy ass white trash / hope you and your family dies a slow and painful death”

 

 

See also:

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Stanford University fraternity told to remove American flag because it’s intimidating and aggressive

The next time we find ourselves despairing about the future of America, remember the young people of Sigma Chi and the Stanford Review.

The Stanford Review is an independent newspaper staffed completely by Stanford University undergraduates. It describes itself as “a political magazine that promotes independent thought at Stanford. We aim to promote debate about campus and national issues that are otherwise not represented by traditional publications.”

Stanford Review‘s executive director Antigone Xenopoulos reports on Nov. 28, 2018, that the Sigma Chi fraternity was on probation last year. So the fraternity tried to improve its image with the university so that the probation would be lifted and the fraternity be allowed to continue.

According to senior Pablo Lozano, class of 2018, as well as other students who asked not to be named, a Stanford University administrator “encouraged” Sigma Chi to take down the American flag flown in front of its house in order to improve its image on campus.

The administrative – let’s call him Mr. Z – was assigned to serve as a liaison between Residential Education and Sigma Chi. At first, Mr. Z was supportive and helpful, explaining to the fraternity often obscure bureaucratic processes.

But his demeanor changed one night in Autumn 2017.

The fraternity had invited Mr. Z to dinner, during which he “offhandedly suggested” that the American flag flown in front of the Sigma Chi house be removed.

Mr. Z urged Sigma Chi to consider the image being presented to the rest of campus by flying the flag out front. Lozano understood the administrator to imply that the American flag was intimidating, aggressive or alienating, and made others uncomfortable, and that Mr. Z found the mere sight of the American flag to be offensive.

Lozano recounted that the more the house talked about Mr. Z’s suggestion, the more it bothered them. Many found his proposal to take down the flag “weird”. The remark was out of the blue and incongruent with the rapport the fraternity had shared with Mr. Z. Furthermore, the fraternity wondered since when is an American flag flown at an institution in the United States offensive?

In fact, American flags adorned buildings near Sigma Chi and on campus, including:

  • Stanford’s Post Office right down the road from Sigma Chi.
  • Green Library’s Bing Wing.
  • Memorial Auditorium, which commemorates fallen Stanford soldiers since WWI.

Furthermore, Lozano noted that Mr. Z raised no objections to the Dominican flag flown by a student from his bedroom window in Sigma Chi or to the Palestinian flag hung across the street at Columbae.

To Sigma Chi’s credit, the fraternity not only declined to remove the American flag from its house, they replaced it with an even bigger one — from a 3×5 ft. flag to a 4×6 ft. flag. The former flag was then framed and placed on display inside the house. In Lozano’s words, Sigma Chi’s decision was a “silent but visible protest” against the classification of the American flag as a potentially stigmatizing symbol by a member of the Stanford administration.

And the upshot?

Sigma Chi is gone. The fraternity was shut down last May and no longer exists at Stanford University. (Breitbart)

Stanford Reviews executive director Antigone Xenopoulos concludes:

This series of events, known to few, is concerning on multiple levels. One can imagine a justification for opposing a foreign flag being flown on one’s own soil, though I believe that such a condemnation would be ultra-nationalist and antagonistic. One could also reasonably consider the display of an authoritarian regime’s flag to be insulting and hostile – be it a flag representing Nazi Germany, The Confederacy, or Apartheid South Africa. One can likewise anticipate the classification of a sectarian flag as illegal – be it that of Catalonian or Chechen separatists. However, there is no reason why hoisting the American flag, on American soil, at an American institution, is offensive.

Every individual – American or not – has a right to take issue with any and all policies and actions that the U.S. government takes. I am not discouraging criticism of, protest against, or opposition to U.S. government policies. In fact, I encourage such scrutiny. To classify the American flag on American soil as offensive or jingoistic, however, is an entirely separate phenomenon which implies the condemnation of the United States at large.

There is an evident aversion amongst private institutions in the Bay Area to affiliate or partner with the American government. Be it Google employees protesting collaboration with the military on AI development, the absence of the national anthem at Stanford’s 2018 graduation ceremony, the elimination of the American flag from student organization logos, or Stanford’s framing itself as a global rather than American institution, the pattern is clear. Affiliation or partnership with the U.S. government is neither popular nor sexy. Patriotism in the Bay [San Francisco Bay Area] is not praised; indeed, at this rate of pariah-hood, it may soon perish.

However, the presently taboo nature of national pride is shortsighted. The distinction between our timeless political institutions (and their hallowed symbols) and the country’s leaders and policies at any given moment in history is elementary but crucial. Condemnations of patriotism fail to recognize that the United States’ institutions have and will continue to outlive unpopular leaders. This fact alone is cause for significant national pride. The vilification of our nation and its symbols is damning for the social fabric of American society. The current political climate has destroyed the last remnants of civic unity and patriotism.

But enough with the ominous platitudes. Next time you hear someone degrade a symbol of the United States – whether in the form of a flag, the Constitution, or the national anthem – you can defend the principles of this nation through oration or just go out and, like Sigma Chi, buy a bigger one.

To donate to The Stanford Review, go here.

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

Houston school expels student who refused to stand for Pledge of Allegiance

USA Today reports, Sept. 28, 2018, that months after Windfern High School in Houston, Texas, expelled senior student India Landry for refusing to stand during the Pledge of Allegiance, her mom, Kizzy Landry, has launched a legal battle against the school, saying her daughter wasn’t able to practice free speech.

India, now 18, was sent home last year after sitting during the pledge. She said: “I don’t think that the flag is what it says it’s for, for liberty and justice and all that. It’s not obviously what’s going on in America today.”

Her mother, Kizzy, said when she came to pick up India, the school provided little details as to why her daughter was kicked out. Later, the principal told the mother, “She can’t come to my school if she won’t stand for the pledge.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is intervening on the school’s behalf. Paxton said in a statement this week:

Schoolchildren cannot unilaterally refuse to participate in the pledge. Requiring the pledge to be recited at the start of every school day has the laudable result of fostering respect for our flag and a patriotic love of our country.

According to Texas law, students must recite the pledge unless they have a parent or guardian’s permission to opt out. Texas is one of 26 states with similar Pledge statutes.

Houston attorney Randall Kallinen, who was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2003, has filed a federal lawsuit on Landry’s behalf, arguing that free speech protections also apply to silent protests. Kallinen has dismissed Paxton’s involvement as a political move, saying he’s confident his client “will prevail and she will once again be able to sit for the pledge of allegiance.”

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0