Category Archives: war on patriotism

BOOM!!! Theft, FEC hacked or the Republican party has sold out President Trump, his supporters and America. Billions of dollars transferred to DNC PAC and the “Joe Biden for President” committee from Republican NRCC, NRSC, Congressional Leadership Fund and other conservative committees, PACs and organizations

FUNDRAISING PAC Filings at the Federal Election Commission show Billions of dollars being transferred out of Republican party committees and PACS, directly to the DNC PAC and the “Biden for President” committee.

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

D.C Mayor seeks to remove the names of white men from government buildings in Washington

A Washington, DC committee formed by Mayor Muriel Bowser has recommended changing the names of schools and government buildings and has even called for the federal government to “remove, relocate or contextualize” a group of federal memorials and monuments, including the Washington Monument, the Jefferson Memorial, and the Benjamin Franklin Statue. Bowser’s committee, the District of Columbia Facilities and Commemorative Expressions (DC FACES), submitted the final executive report Monday (August 31, 2020).

The report covered surveys of DC’s named, government-owned buildings (libraries, schools, rec centers, etc), parks, statues in DC Government-owned parks, miscellaneous other named public spaces, and even city streets. The committee cataloged the race of people whose names appeared and discovered that fully seventy percent of government properties were named after white people. It is these people whose names are slated for erasure. Just a sample of the names is enough to demonstrate the level of racism and hatred being directed at once prominent white people.

Schools:

1.Alexander Graham Bell – Bell Multicultural High School
2. Robert Brent – Brent Elementary School
3. Jehiel Brooks – Brookland Middle School
4. James Monroe – Bruce-Monroe Elementary School @ Park View
5. James Birney – Excel Academy/Lee Montessori PCS – East End (at Birney School)
6. Charles William Eliot – Eliot-Hine Middle School
7. Anthony T. Hyde, Henry Addison – Hyde-Addison Elementary School
8. Thomas Jefferson – Jefferson Middle School
9. Francis Scott Key – Key Elementary School
10. Zachary Taylor – Ludlow-Taylor Elementary School
11. John Walker Maury – Maury Elementary School
12. William Winston Seaton – Seaton Elementary School
13. Benjamin Stoddert – Stoddert Elementary School
14. Strong John Thomson – Thomson Elementary School
15. John Tyler – Tyler Elementary School
16. John Peter Van Ness – Van Ness Elementary School
17. Joseph Rodman West – West Education Campus
18. Woodrow Wilson – Woodrow Wilson High School
19. C. Melvin Sharpe – Bridges PCS Sharpe Campus
20.William Benning – DC Prep PCS, Benning Elementary
21. Matthew Gault Emery – Emery School (CHOICE Academy)

Parks and recreation

1. James D. Barry – Barry Farm Playground
2. William Benning, Benjamin Stoddert – Benning Stoddert Playground, Garden
3. Robert Brent – Brentwood Playground, Brentwood Hamilton Field
4. James Monroe – Bruce-Monroe Community Garden
5. Matthew Gault Emery – Emery Heights Playground, Garden
6. Henry Foxall – Foxhall Playground
7. Thomas Jefferson – Jefferson Field
8. Guy Mason – Guy Mason Playground
9. William Henry Harrison – Harrison Playground
10. James Greenleaf – King-Greenleaf Playground
11. Benjamin Stoddert – Stoddert Playground
12. Abel P. Upshur – Upshur Playground

Bowser took to Twitter to announce her pleasure with her committee’s recommendations,saying, “”I look forward to reviewing and advancing their recommendations,”

The return tweets from her detractors in response were quick to respond .Interior Secretary David Bernhardt tweeted that no changes were going to happen as long as he was in office. “Not on my watch. Never going to happen,” he tweeted.

The White House also responded to the committee’s report.

“By publishing a plan that recommends potentially removing the Washington Monument, Christopher Columbus Statue, Andrew Jackson Statue, and Jefferson Memorial—among many other ludicrous recommendations—the radically liberal mayor of Washington, D.C., is repeating the same left-wing narrative used to incite dangerous riots: demolishing our history and destroying our great heritage,” White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said in a statement.

“Our Nation’s capital is rightly filled with countless markers, memorials, and statues to honor and respect the men and women who built this country. President Donald J. Trump believes these places should be preserved, not torn down; respected, not hated; and passed on for generations to come. As long as President Trump is in the White House, the mayor’s irresponsible recommendations will go absolutely nowhere, and as the mayor of our Nation’s capital city—a city that belongs to the American people—she ought to be ashamed for even suggesting them for consideration,” McEnany concluded.

The full report can be read here:

https://mayor.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/mayormb/page_content/attachments/DC%20FACES%20Executive%20Summary_r10sm.pdf

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Why Democrats hate the flag: Seeing even a small American flag can make you vote Republican

This why “Progressives”, including “woke” corporations like the NFL, are allergic to the American flag and the national anthem.

A study found that just seeing even a small American flag one time shifted both Democrats and Republicans toward the Republican end of the ideological spectrum in beliefs, attitudes, as well as voting intentions and behavior.

The study, “A Single Exposure to the American Flag Shifts Support Toward Republicanism up to 8 Months Later,” by Travis J. Carter (University of Chicago), Melissa J. Ferguson (Cornell University) and Ran R. Hassin (Hebrew University) was published in Psychological Science on July 8, 2011.

Here is the Abstract:

We report that a brief exposure to the American flag led to a shift toward Republican beliefs, attitudes, and voting behavior among both Republican and Democratic participants, despite their overwhelming belief that exposure to the flag would not influence their behavior. In Experiment 1, which was conducted online during the 2008 U.S. presidential election, a single exposure to an American flag resulted in a significant increase in participants’ Republican voting intentions, voting behavior, political beliefs, and implicit and explicit attitudes, with some effects lasting 8 months after the exposure to the prime. In Experiment 2, we replicated the findings more than a year into the current Democratic presidential term. These results constitute the first evidence that nonconscious priming effects from exposure to a national flag can bias the citizenry toward one political party and can have considerable durability.

Ed Yong of Discover magazine has more details on the study.

Experiment #1:

  • In the run-up to the 2008 US presidential election, a group of around 200 volunteers were asked them about their political views.
  • A month or so later, the volunteers were divided into two groups that were comparable in their political beliefs, voting intentions and other variables.
  • Both groups rated how likely they were to vote for either the Democrat Barack Obama or the Republican John McCain on an online questionnaire.
  • The questionnaires were identical except for one small detail – in the top left corner of the screen, one group saw a small American flag and the other saw nothing.
  • That tiny difference was enough to swing their voting preferences. Those who saw the tiny flag became more likely to vote for McCain than Obama (relative to their answers at the start of the experiment); felt more positive towards Republicans; and showed a small Republican bias in their unconscious atittudes.
  •  After the election, the volunteers were asked whom they actually voted for. Those who saw the flag were less likely to have voted for Obama than those who didn’t (73% versus 84%). They were also more likely to think that the media were unduly harsh in their treatment of McCain.
  • The flag effect lasted for at least 8 months. In July 2009, eight months after the experiment, participants who saw the tiny flag on-screen still showed some Republican bias. They were less happy about Obama’s job performance than their peers, less warm about other Democrat leaders, and even held slightly more conservative views.

Experiment #2:

  • In spring of 2010, with Obama a year in power, a new group of 70 volunteers were asked to look at four photographs. Half the people saw buildings with flags in front of them; the others saw photos where the flags had been digitally removed.
  • Even though the two groups had the same spectrum of political beliefs beforehand, the flag group shifted towards a Republican worldview after seeing the photos.

Now you know why the Left — Democrats, Progressives, woke capitalists, the media — are allergic and downright hostile to the American flag, national anthem, statues of the Founding Fathers, and patriotism in general.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Portland thugs celebrate the murder of a Trump supporter

The true face of BLM and Antifa was on display,
and by their silence, the entire Democrat party.

Elections have consequences.

TD

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

The real story: It’s not just a few big Democrat cities that are burning

Demorats have generally ignored rioting in the streets and have suggested that President Trump is the cause of any social disruption. Mainstream media have suggested that the rioting is confined to half a dozen big cities. Republicans have blamed Demorat mayors and governors for not bringing the riots under control.

But fact is, none of us are getting the true picture of what is happening to this country. Protests and riots have occurred in all 50 states. The Army National Guard has been deployed to at least 23 states and the District of Columbia to combat rioters and looters. More than 350 cities and towns have been wracked with unrest—all this while left-wing socialist/communist government officials sit in complacent approval of the mayhem.

Our country is coming apart at the seams. Nero fiddles while Rome burns.

What follows is research published on June 2, 2020 by Mohammed Haddad, writing for Aljazeera. These data are more than two months old.

I have to wonder, how much worse is it now?

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/interactive/2020/06/mapping-cities-george-floyd-protests-erupted-200601081654119.html

~ Grif

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Venezuelan Warns US: Socialism Starts by Destroying Monuments and Censoring Everything

The left’s socialist/communist’s playbook never changes. The reason is simple. It generally achieves its goal of turning free and democratic countries into totalitarian cesspools where a dictatorial government subjugates its citizens and destroys a vibrant capitalist economy all in the name of “equality.” Venezuela is one such socialist utopia.

Venezuela was once the richest and most promising country in Latin America. It has the largest oil reserves in the world, and for a long time it had a growing democracy. But today, its economic and democratic institutions have failed. While inflation skyrockets, food and medicine have become so expensive that for the country’s poor, who now make up a staggering 82 percent of the population, cannot afford to buy them. Many are reduced to eating out of garbage dumps. Theft and murder are endemic, and the ruling Maduro government keeps an iron grip on the people.

Now, Elizabeth Rogliani, an activist who was among the more than two million Venezuelans who have fled their country since dits economy collapsed, has a warning for us.

Andrés Guilarte, who remains in Venezuela, describes his perspective on what socialism will do to the United States if Americans ignore the current turmoil that is dividing the country.

~ Grif

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

The Chinese Communist Party has your data and a lot more.

The Chinese Communist Party(CCP) has your data. The thought of them not having it never entered my mind.  How did it happen?

CCP gains control (short version)

During WWII Japan had occupied about 25% of China. During that time there were three armies at war with each other in China. The Chinese Communist Party(CCP) was at war with the Chinese Nationalist.  Both were at war with Japan.

Japan  had invaded China prior to its involvement in WWII.  Japan’s  weapons were far superior and had air superiority. This combined with a plethora of other problems, China was unable to beat Japan.

By the time Japan was removed from China they had killed at least 25 million Chinese and had committed thousands of war crimes.

During WWII America started helping Chinese Nationalist with there problem with Japan.  After America dropped 2 nuclear bombs on Japan, Russia declared war on Japan.  The result was Japan’s surrender. The CCP says they defeated Japan but it was the Americans and Russia, with the help of Chinese Nationalists that beat Japan.

With Japan out of the picture By 1949 the CCP had defeated the Chinese Nationalist.

It was the 1st of October in 1949 when the leader of the Chinese Communist Party(CCP), Mao Zedong declared the creation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

I don’t want to get into details about China’s government structure or their  domestic problems but I will say they have a congress, a president and a judicial branch. It should be noted that their roles are not the same as we have here in the USA. For example, their role of president is primarily a ceremonial role with limited powers.

With that being said, the current president, Xi Jinping, is still the most powerful person in China.  Not because he is president…

President Xi Jinping  is also the paramount leader,. His real power comes from being the General Secretary of the Communist Party,. He is also the general secretary of the Central Committee, and Chairman of the Central Military Commission..

The thing to remember is that the CCP has  total control of China.

Xi  once borrowed a line from China’s first president Mao Zedong: “Government, military, society, education, north, south, east, west—the party leads everything.”

 Xi wants China to  be the super power of the world. He wants the world dependent on China.  He wants other nations  to look at China for leadership like they  look at the USA.  

Should we trust China?  Is China a threat to the USA?  I won’t tell you who you should  trust. That’s  for you to decide, but I will say “yes. China is a threat”

Have you ever heard of Title 7 of China’s national intelligence law? It makes every Chinese National a potential spy.

 

The following comes from an article H.R. McMaster’s wrote, which includes parts written by Howard W. French.

“China intends to establish a new tributary system through a massive effort organized under three overlapping policies, carrying the names “Made in China 2025,” “Belt and Road Initiative,” and “Military-Civil Fusion.”
“Made in China 2025” is designed to help China become a largely independent scientific and technological power. To achieve that goal, the party is creating high-tech monopolies inside China and stripping foreign companies of their intellectual property by means of theft and forced technology transfer. In some cases, foreign companies are forced to enter into joint ventures with Chinese companies before they are permitted to sell their products in China. These Chinese companies mostly have close ties to the party, making routine the transfer of intellectual property and manufacturing techniques to the Chinese government.”
“The “Belt and Road Initiative” calls for more than $1 trillion in new infrastructure investments across the Indo-Pacific region, Eurasia, and beyond. Its true purpose is to place China at the hub of trade routes and communications networks. While the initiative at first received an enthusiastic reception from nations that saw opportunities for economic growth, many of those nations soon realized that Chinese investment came with strings attached.”
“The Belt and Road Initiative has created a common pattern of economic clientelism. Beijing first offers countries loans from Chinese banks for large-scale infrastructure projects. Once the countries are in debt, the party forces their leaders to align with China’s foreign-policy agenda and the goal of displacing the influence of the United States and its key partners. Although Chinese leaders often depict these deals as win-win, most of them have just one real winner.”
The Military-Civil Fusion policy is the most totalitarian of the three prongs. In 2014 and then again in 2017, the party declared that all Chinese companies must collaborate in gathering intelligence. “Any organization or citizen,” reads Article 7 of China’s National Intelligence Law, “shall support, assist with, and collaborate with the state intelligence work in accordance with the law, and keep the secrets of the national intelligence work known to the public.” Chinese companies work alongside universities and research arms of the People’s Liberation Army. Military-Civil Fusion encourages state-owned and private enterprises to acquire companies with advanced technologies, or a strong minority stake in those companies, so that the technologies can be applied for not only economic but also military and intelligence advantage. It fast-tracks stolen technologies to the army in such areas as space, cyberspace, biology, artificial intelligence, and energy. In addition to espionage and cybertheft by the Ministry of State Security, the party tasks some Chinese students and scholars in the U.S. and at other foreign universities and research labs with extracting technology.”
“Sometimes U.S. defense funding supports China’s technology transfers. One of many examples is the Kuang-Chi Group, described in the Chinese media as “a military-civilian enterprise.” The Kuang-Chi Group was founded largely on the basis of U.S. Air Force–funded research into meta-materials at Duke University.”

If you have been paying attention and  doing your own research  you might  agree with  French and McMasters. I’m not a fan of McMasters political career in the White House but on this topic he appears to be on target.

Here are 7 more quotes of McMasters.

  1. “Chinese espionage is successful in part because the party is able to induce cooperation, wittingly or unwittingly, from individuals, companies, and political leaders. Companies in the United States and other free-market economies often do not report theft of their technology, because they are afraid of losing access to the Chinese market, harming relationships with customers, or prompting federal investigations.”
  2. “Many universities, research labs, and companies in countries that value the rule of law and individual rights are witting or unwitting accomplices in China’s use of technology to repress its people and improve the Chinese military’s capabilities. For dual-use technologies, the private sector should seek new partnerships with those who share commitments to free-market economies, representative government, and the rule of law, not with those acting against these principles. Many companies are engaged in joint ventures or partnerships that help China develop technologies suited for internal security, such as surveillance, artificial intelligence, and biogenetics. In one of many examples, a Massachusetts-based company sold DNA-sampling equipment that has helped the Chinese government track Uighurs in Xinjiang. (The company has ended such sales.) Companies that knowingly collaborate with China’s efforts to repress its own people or build threatening military capabilities should be penalized.”
  3. “Many Chinese companies directly or indirectly involved in domestic human-rights abuses and violation of international treaties are listed on American stock exchanges. Those companies benefit from U.S. and other Western investors. Tougher screening of U.S., European, and Japanese capital markets would help restrict corporate and investor complicity in China’s authoritarian agenda. Free-market economies like ours control the majority of the world’s capital, and we have far more leverage than we are employing”
  4. “China’s use of major telecommunications companies to control communications networks and the internet overseas must be countered. There should no longer be any dispute concerning the need to defend against the multinational technology company Huawei and its role in China’s security apparatus. In 2019, a series of investigations revealed incontrovertible evidence of the grave national-security danger associated with a wide array of Huawei’s telecommunications equipment. Many Huawei workers are simultaneously employed by China’s Ministry of State Security and the intelligence arm of the People’s Liberation Army. Huawei technicians have used intercepted cell data to help autocratic leaders in Africa spy on, locate, and silence political opponents. A priority area for multinational cooperation among free societies should be the development of infrastructure, particularly 5G communications, to form trusted networks that protect sensitive and proprietary data.”
  5. “We must defend against Chinese agencies that coordinate influence operations abroad—such as the Ministry of State Security, the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Students and Scholars Association. At the same time, we should try to maximize positive interactions and experiences with the Chinese people. The United States and other free and open societies should consider issuing more visas and providing paths to citizenship for more Chinese—with proper safeguards in place. Chinese who engage with citizens of free countries are the ones who are most likely to question their government’s policies—whether from abroad or when they return home.:”
  6. “The U.S. and other free nations should view expatriate communities as a strength. Chinese abroad—if protected from the meddling and espionage of their government—can provide a significant counter to Beijing’s propaganda and disinformation. Investigations and expulsions of Ministry of State Security and other agents should be oriented not only toward protecting the targeted country but also toward protecting the Chinese expatriates within it.”
  7. “Without effective pushback from the United States and like-minded nations, China will become even more aggressive in promoting its statist economy and authoritarian political model. For me, the state visit to Beijing—and exposure to China’s powerful combination of insecurity and ambition—reinforced my belief that the United States and other nations must no longer adhere to a view of China based mainly on Western aspirations. If we compete aggressively, we have reason for confidence. China’s behavior is galvanizing opposition among countries that do not want to be vassal states. Internally, the tightening of control is also eliciting opposition. The bravado of Li Keqiang and other officials may be intended to evoke the idea of China as sovereign of “everything beneath heaven,” but many beneath heaven do not, and must not, agree.

 

Because of China’s skill in propaganda and the enormous amount of fake news I can understand how some people might not be aware of  Xi’s ambitions, the CCP’s behavior and how China has infiltrated  America.  If you are one of those people,  you shouldn’t be in the dark any longer. McMasters analysis is accurate. Clearly he sees that any American interaction with China, be it a partnership, investment, opening a business in china, helping a Chinese National open a business in America  or any involvement with China is not in the best interest of America
  It only creates opportunity for espionage.
 What the average person sees as a business transaction he probably sees a opportunity  for espionage. I get the impression that he knows that chinese espionage  occurs  daily in the USA.
  Under the current conditions with China, I’m sure he would like to see all activities with China  stop unless immediate action is taking to stop the espionage.  I agree with him because he’s right.(on this matter).
*McMasters  remarks come from his book, Battlegrounds: The Fight to Defend the Free World by H. R. McMaster.  

They can also be found at kyotoreview.org, chinas-three-pronged-strategy-on-regional-connectivity

And https://nationalcybersecurity.com/h-r-mcmaster-what-china-wants-espionage-surveillance-ceo-businesssecurity/

Now that you know what you thought to be true about the CCP and China is actually true, take a look around and see if anything from China has spilled over into your life.

I looked around and found that in both goods and services, China has been in my life for quite a long time..

China is everywhere in the USA. They own property, businesses, banks and politicians. They have also had quite a bit of success on the internet..  That’s  where we need to pay close attention. No one should be using Chinese apps

We see Tencent Holdings all over the news.  They definitely are a security risk. They have access to millions of Americans. They have large amounts of cash invested in American companies. Reddit  and Discord are popular platforms  that Tencent has invested substantial amounts of money.

I’ve talked about this in the past.  You don’t  give 150 million dollars to someone (Reddit) and  say “here’s  my money, contact me when you turn a profit.”  That money gives them partial ownership of the company.  That money gets them influence throughout the whole company.  That influence finds its way to the customer. If you use Reddit, you can be sure Tencent Holdings has some of your data. Don’t forget platforms like Reddit have influence in our elections.

Personally, I think it’s  too late.  China, the CCP has our data.  They have  also infiltrated our government.  What we need to do is remove the problem and see that it doesn’t  happen again. I know exactly who should be the first to go.

There is one company that I think poses the most danger to our country.  It’s  how the CCP has managed to find it’s way into you and your families daily lives.  It’s  worked its  way into  our government and is able to influence voters in our elections..  I’m talking about ZOOM.  The same company that schools use to teach children. The same company that has been making millions during the pandemic. The only company that I’ve seen under investigation by the FBI because of a security risk, but was still authorized for use in our government…(see image).

 

 

For PDF click here

You might be saying, ” ZOOM is an American company, what’s  the problem?”

Here are a few example problems of many .   While reading it, keep in mind article 7 and everything else McMasters mentioned.

Sequoia Capital  has a minimum investment  of 100 million dollars in Zoom.. Sequoia is listed on “Our team” page at Zoom.  The firm has offices in Menlo Park, Singapore, Bengaluru, Mumbai, New Delhi, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Beijing, and Tel Aviv.   Sequoia has numerous investors located in China.  Zoom  has many big investors with branches in China.  Think Article 7 + more.

Zoom as of January 2020 has 2,532 full time employees.  1,396 worked in the USA. Around 700 of the remaining employees work at their research and development location in China. This location alone is a huge risk. To make improvements, research and development is going to need data.  User data..  The facility in China will have employees that are hired locally.  China wouldn’t allow the business exist there if they didn’t. Article 7 risk + more

Zoom cannot guarentee their investors that data and intellectual property under their control is safe. In their annual report they admit that they have had security breaches in the past and imore breaches  they cannot defend against will happen in the future.  Thay also  admit that in some countries they may not be able to protect data. Below is documentation  where they mention these security risks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zoom  has history of getting caught routing data to China.  They say “it was a mistake.  It’s the only time it has ever happened.”  I see it like this, You catch a long time employee stealing. They say it was their first time.  I say, “no. It’s the first time they  got caught. They’ve been stealing since the beginning.”  ZOOM had been doing it since day one.

Taiwan banned zoom for routing data to China.

Singapore teachers banned zoom because of hackers.

ZOOM = PROBLEMS

The following are screenshots of search results that come up when I Google Zoom.

 

So how did Zoom get approved for government  use? FedRamp approved  Zoom.  FedRamp is. part of the General Services administration (GSA) . Technically GSA is part of the executive branch, but it functions on its own.

I believe  Trump saw some problems with FedRamp in 2017.  He signed in an executive order that made the head of departments solely responsible for online security in their departments.

Link

  1. Democrats decided to rewrite FedRamp and pass legislation on it. What they did was create  more non elected job positions that have access to data  in information they shouldn’t be allowed to have loopinformation non elected people should not have.  One of the positions would give them access to Executive  branch information/activity congress has never had in the past.  Basically Democrats created a “mole” that was to report to congress  Another example of Democrats overreach. They created an additional 20 million dollar expense taxpayers neverr had before..

On February 5, 2020 when democrats and the fake news started  advancing their planned pandemic, the democrats in congress suspended the rules and passed the FedRamp rewrite.

Link

When it comes to Zoom, you will see democrats complaining about Zoom.  Personally I think it’s  part of their grift they are pulling on the USA. They do it to control the  conversation.  That way when a real problems comes along they can say “were on it, we see the problem and were taking care of it”.  It’s the only solution I could come up with.  Zoom is on the democrats top donor list.  100% of donations to political parties made by Zoom goes to the left. They are protecting Zoom.

The man behind the donations is the founder and current CEO of Zoom.

Eric S. Yuan(Yuán Zhēng) , Born in 1970, in China. He moved to the USA in 1997 . One of the founders of WebEx, Min Zhu  gave him a job.  WebEx was aquired by Cisco in 2007. He left the company in 2011 after making a pitch and getting denied. That’s when he started his first business which led to his first release  of Zoom in 2012..

,,*Yuan once mentioned that WebEx is still using code he wrote in 1998

*After his failure of promoting his idea, he left and took his idea with him.  It’s always been my understanding that any ideas you come up with while working for a company,  those ideas belong to the company and you cannot take them with you.

*Min Zhu resigned in 2005 and left the USA.. “Zhu continues to serve as a science and technology advisor to the municipal government of San Jose,”

“It does not surprise me that San Jose, located in California would have a citizen of a foreign communist country. as their science and technology advisor. It goes hand in hand with the lawless behavior of the democrat party in California.  The situation that  requires more attention in California  is Governor Newsom hijacking  the residents of California pandemic relief  unemployment insurance money. Parents and their children are starving losing their homes because they have not received their money from the federal government.  Newsom blames  the unemployment office but he is the only person that can stop the flow of money. 
What also requires attention is Newsom forcing mail in ballots.  Even if you go to a polling place to vote they give you a mail in ballot.  It shouldn’t be anymore obvious what the Democrats are doing. They’re rigging the election.

If any  American corporations have  branch locations in China, business partners or accepted big investments out of China and say they don’t have any security  risks, they are lying.  With the current laws in China, any involvement with China is a open door for espionage.  This is not a conspiracy theory, This is a fact. A person only needs to take a minute to look at some of their laws.

National Intelligence Law of the People’s Republic of China

Chapter I: General Provisions

Article 1: In order to strengthen and guarantee national intelligence work, and safeguard national security and interests, on the basis of the Constitution, this Law is formulated.

Article 2: National intelligence work shall persist in an overall national security view, provide intelligence reference for major national policy decisions, provide intelligence support for preventing and dissolving risks endangering national security, and safeguard the national regime, sovereignty, unity, independence and territorial integrity, the prosperity of the people, economic and social sustainable development and other major national interests.

Article 3: The State establishes and completes a concentrated and united national intelligence structure with a coordinated division of work, which is scientific and highly effective.

Central and State security leadership bodies exercise uniform leadership over national intelligence work, formulate principles and policies for national intelligence work, standardize the overall development of national intelligence work, establish and complete coordination mechanisms for national intelligence work, comprehensively coordinate national intelligence work in all areas, research and decide upon major matters in national intelligence work.

The Central Military Commission uniformly leads and organizes military intelligence work.

Article 4: National principles shall persist in the principles of the integration of open work and classified work, the integration of specialized work and the mass line, and the integration of division of work and responsibilities, and coordination and cooperation.

Article 5: Intelligence organs of national security bodies and public security bodies, as well as military intelligence organs (hereafter jointly named national intelligence work organs) will, according to the division of work and responsibilities, provide mutual assistance, do intelligence work and launch intelligence activities well. All relevant national bodies shall, on the basis of their duties, tasks and the division of work, cooperate closely with national intelligence work organs.

Article 6: All national bodies, military forces, political parties, social groups, enterprise and undertaking organizations, as well as citizens, shall support, cooperate with and collaborate in national intelligence work, and maintain the secrecy of national intelligence work they are aware of.

Article 7: National intelligence work shall be conducted according to the law, respect and guarantee human rights, and safeguard the lawful rights and interests of citizens and organizations.

Article 8: The State supports individuals supporting or assisting in national intelligence work, and rewards those making major contributions.

Chapter II: National intelligence work organs and powers

Article 9: National intelligence work organs launch intelligence work inside and outside of the borders on the basis of work requirements, and by using the necessary methods, means and channels according to the law.

Article 10: National intelligence work organs shall lawfully collect and process relevant information on foreign bodies, organizations and individuals engaged in, or inciting or assisting others to engage in, or domestic bodies, organizations and individuals who collude with foreign bodies, organs or individuals to engage in harm to the national security and interests of the People’s Republic of China

Article 11: Foreign bodies, organizations or individuals engaging in acts harming the national security and interests of the People’s Republic of China within Chinese borders must be punished by law. National intelligence work organs shall provide intelligence reference and evidence for preventing, curbing and punishing the abovementioned acts.

Article 12: National intelligence work organs may establish a collaborative relationship with relevant individuals and organizations, and entrust them with carrying out relevant work.

Article 13: Relevant departments in all levels’ People’s Governments, enterprise and undertaking work units, other organizations and citizens shall provide the necessary assistance to national intelligence work organs lawfully carrying out their work, and maintain secrecy.

Article 14: National intelligence work organs may, on the basis of work requirements and according to relevant State regulations, after undergoing strict approval procedures, adopt technological reconnaissance measures.

Article 15: National intelligence work bodies’ personnel may, when lawfully exercising their duties, according to relevant State regulations, with permission and after showing corresponding credentials, acquaint themselves with relevant bodies, organizations, enterprise or undertaking work units and individuals, inquire into relevant circumstances, consult or obtain relevant files, materials and goods.

Article 16: National intelligence work organs’ personnel may, when lawfully exercising their duties, according to relevant State regulations, with permission and after showing corresponding credentials, enter relevant limited-access localities and premises; they are also permitted to enjoy passage privilege to carry out urgent task requirements, after showing corresponding credentials.

National intelligence organs’ work personnel may, on the basis of work requirements and according to relevant State regulations, use with priority or lawfully commandeer transportation equipment, telecommunications equipment, spaces and buildings of bodies, organizations, enterprise and undertaking work units and individuals, when necessary, they may set up relevant work premises, equipment and facilities, after completion of the task, they shall timely restore or recover the original state, and pay corresponding fees according to regulations; where damage is caused, it shall be compensated.

Article 17: National intelligence work organs may, on the basis of work requirements and according to relevant State regulations, request Customs, border control, inspection and quarantine and other such bodies to provide exemption from inspection and other such conveniences.

Article 18: National intelligence work organs and their work personnel shall, during work, strictly act according to the law, they may not exceed their powers, abuse their powers, or engage in irregular favouritism, they may not violate the lawful rights and interests of citizens and organizations, and may not divulge State secrets, commercial secrets or personal privacy.

Chapter III: National intelligence work guarantees

Article 19: The State strengthens the construction of national intelligence work organs, exercises special management over their organic structuring, staffing, personnel allocation, funding and assets, and provides special guarantees.

The State establishes personnel employment, recruitment, assessment, training, remuneration and retirement management structures suited to intelligence work.

Article 20: National intelligence work organs shall adapt to intelligence work requirements, and raise their ability to carry out intelligence work.

Article 21: When the personal security of national intelligence work organs’ personnel or their close relatives is threatened due to their exercising their task, or the personal security of individuals with whom national intelligence work bodies have established a cooperative relationship or their close relatives is threatened because of their assistance to national intelligence work, relevant State departments shall adopt the necessary measures to provide protection and succour.

Article 22: Public security, civil affairs, finance, health, education, human resources and social security, as well as other relevant departments and State-owned enterprise and undertaking work units shall cooperate with national intelligence work bodies to properly arrange for persons in need of placement due to contributions to national intelligence work.

Article 23: National intelligence work organs shall establish supervision and security inspection structures, conduct supervision of their personnel’s observance of discipline, and lawfully adopt the necessary measures to regularly or irregularly conduct security inspections.

Article 24: Any individual or organization has the right to report and accuse instances of national intelligence work organs and their personnel exceeding their powers, abusing their powers, engaging in irregular favouritism and other unlawful acts to higher-level organs or relevant departments. Relevant organs or departments receiving reports and accusations shall timely investigate the matter, and report the investigation results to the reporter or accuser.

No other person or organization may suppress or retaliate against individuals or organizations lawfully reporting on or accusing national intelligence work organs and their personnel.

Chapter IV: Legal liability

Article 25: Those violating the relevant provisions of this Law and impede national intelligence work organs and their personnel from carrying out intelligence work, will be punished by relevant work units on suggestion of the national intelligence work organ, or be subject to a warning of administrative detention of less than 15 days by the national public security body, or public security bodies; where it constitutes a crime, legal liability will be prosecuted according to the law.

Article 26: Those divulging State secrets involving national intelligence work, will be punished by relevant work units on suggestion of the national intelligence work organ, or be subject to administrative detention of less than 15 days by the national public security body or public security bodies; where it constitutes a crime, legal liability will be prosecuted according to the law.

Article 27: National intelligence work personnel exceeding their powers, abusing their power, engaging in irregular favouritism, or divulging State secrets, commercial secrets or personal privacy will be punished according to the law; where it constitutes a crime, legal liability will be prosecuted according to the law.

Chapter V: Supplementary provisions

Article 28: This Law takes effect on the date of promulgation.

That was the draft version. For the final version click 2017_PRC_NationalIntelligenceLaw

Zoom is a perfect example of what McMasters talked about.. After reading China’s  laws there shouldn’t be any questions.  Zoom needs to be  removed for government use.  Every  American business connected to China needs to be investigated.

China is not hiding their intentions.  Americans are being  lied to and sold out. Yet, nobody seems to care.

McMasters  knowledge and experience in these matters is unique. If an enemy had access to what he knows. government infiltrations would be almost impossible to stop..

Look at Zoom.  Even with a FBI investigation and a history of security issues. They still  get approved for government use.  It’s  almost like they have a friend on the inside helping them.

What’s  H.R. McMasters up to today? The last time I checked he was doing pretty well. This year he received $450,000 in stock with another $30,000 with an additional $10,000 for being on the audit team. That was just for one job.

That’s  right,  McMasters  sold out. He is currently on the Board of Directors for Zoom.

For full press release click Zoom Adds Board Member H.R. McMaster and Head of Global Public Policy and Government Relations Jonathan Kallmer to Leadership 

Additional  information

https://zoom.us/partners

https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterhigh/2017/03/06/zoom-ceos-promise-to-his-wife-helped-inspire-a-1-billion-valued-company/amp/

https://zoom.us/team

 

China has your data.  Will you allow this to continue? The silent majority must stand up. It’s  time for a great awakening

 

Respectfully,

Deplorable Patriot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Psalm 64 could be a timely intercession for DJT

Psalm 64
1 Hear me, my God, as I voice my complaint;
protect my life from the threat of the enemy.

2 Hide me from the conspiracy of the wicked,
from the plots of evildoers.

3 They sharpen their tongues like swords
and aim cruel words like deadly arrows.

4 They shoot from ambush at the innocent;
they shoot suddenly, without fear.

5 They encourage each other in evil plans,
they talk about hiding their snares;
they say, “Who will see it?”

6 They plot injustice and say,
“We have devised a perfect plan!”
Surely the human mind and heart are cunning.

7 But God will shoot them with his arrows;
they will suddenly be struck down.

8 He will turn their own tongues against them
and bring them to ruin;
all who see them will shake their heads in scorn.

9 All people will fear;
they will proclaim the works of God
and ponder what he has done.

10 The righteous will rejoice in the Lord
and take refuge in him;
all the upright in heart will glory in him!


Selah” is a term we see in the psalms. Its meaning is not entirely clear, but one way to understand it is to pause and think about the last verse. Stop and think about it.

When we stop and think about this psalm, we see nature of wicked liars who constantly attack the righteous with false accusations, and plot harm, thinking God doesn’t pay attention.

Then in the last part of the psalm we see assurances that God does see their plots and schemes, and He frustrates them. And He enables His people to take refuge in Him.

Pause and think about that.

For three and a half years now we have seen a relentless series of attacks on President Trump, and on every righteous institution in America. If we don’t commit to trusting God in the midst of this storm of lies, we could easily grow weary or even give up the fight. Instead, let us pause and ponder the promises of God’s protection, and take heart for the long run.

~ TD

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

They Die For You

I pray that those who would destroy our country and our way of life would just acknowledge this simple truth. But I doubt that they will.

The truth will set you free.

~ Grif

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

1 in 3 Americans believe civil war is likely in 5 years

BlackLivesMatter riots continue to blaze across America.

Mobs in paroxysms of blind rage and demonic glee topple statues of our Founding Fathers, presidents, and historical figures Confederate or not, which belie the rioters’ ostensible cause of anti-racism.

Tbis is no longer about racism.

What we are witnessing is not just anarchism, it is chaos for chaos’ sake, destruction for the sake of destruction. Like the Taliban in Afghanistan who tore down and defaced Buddhist statues, the rioters today are tearing down historical symbols to obliterate American history itself.

If they could, they would topple the Statue of Liberty.

Amidst all the statue-untoppling, rioting, looting, burning, and occupation of city blocks, mayors and governors do nothing.

Democrats in Congress, especially their leader House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, not only do nothing, they are silent — their silence an unspoken acquiescence and approval. The Republicans are little better.

The only public figure who is vocal in his condemnation of all the anarchy and mayhem is President Trump, but he receives little to no support from his own party.

It is no wonder that the latest Rasmussen poll found that as many as 34% of U.S. likely voters, i.e., one in three, think that civil war is likely sometime in the next five years. 9% believe civil war is “very likely”.

Last year, 31% of Americans thought civil war was likely; the year before, in 2018, it was 11%.

The national phone and online survey of 1,000 likely voters was conducted one June 11 and 14, 2020 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is ± 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

Other findings:

  • 40% of Republicans, 38% of nonpartisan or unaffiliated, and only 28% of Democrats see a second war on the horizon. 
  • 39% of all likely voters believe the removal of Confederate symbols, names and monuments throughout the country honoring those who fought in the first civil war will help race relations. 27% disagree and think it will hurt race relations instead; 28% think removing public traces of the Confederacy will have no impact.
  • 37% of likely voters think the current protests over the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officers will lead to long-term, meaningful racial change in America. 31% disagree; 32% are not sure.
  • Race: Just 29% of blacks believe the current protests will lead to long-term, meaningful racial change in America, compared to 35% of whites and 48% of other minority voters. Blacks (54%) are far more confident than whites (36%) and other minorities (40%), however, that the removal of Confederate symbols, names and monuments will help race relations.
  • Gender and age: Women and those under 40 are more supportive of the current anti-police protests and the anti-Confederacy drive than men and older voters. Younger voters worry most about another civil war.
  • Political party: 64% of Democrats think getting rid of all traces of the Confederacy will help race relations, a view shared by only 19% of Republicans and 31% of unaffiliated voters.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0