Category Archives: False flag

Gallup Poll: Only 25% support a ban on handguns

With all the #BLM and Antifa riots and violence, it’s no suprise that according to the latest Gallup poll, Americans are less likely to call for increased gun control than they have been since 2016 .

From Sept. 30 to Oct. 15, 2020, in telephone interviews with a minimum quota of 70% cellphone respondents and 30% landline respondents, Gallup polled a national random sample of 1,035 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. The margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.

Here are the poll results:

  • Support for a ban on the possession of handguns:
    • Only 25% support a ban on handguns, which is a decrease of 18 percentage points from its 1991 high, and is near the lowest on record in Gallup’s 40-year trend.
    • 74% of U.S. adults say such a ban should not be put in place.

  • Support for stricter laws governing the sale of firearm:
    • While a majority of 57% support stricter laws covering the sale of firearms, this is a seven-percentage-point decline since last year. Note that in 1990, as many as 78% of U.S. adults wanted stricter laws for the sale of firearms.
    • 34% of U.S. adults prefer that gun laws be kept as they are now.
    • 9% would like gun laws to be less strict.
  • Those who want stricter gun-sales laws:
    • More women (67%) than men (46%).
    • More Democrats (85%) and Independents (60%) than Republicans (22%).
    • More non-gunowners (72%) than gunowners (26%).
    • More blue than red states: East (68%), West (63%), Midwest (50%), South (49%).
    • More residents of cities (65%) and suburbia (58%) than rural (46%).
  • Mass-shooting false-flags like Sandy Hook and Parkland work, but only for a time. Gallup points out that “Americans’ preferences for tougher gun control have generally peaked in the wake of prominent mass shootings and waned as the memory of each fades.”

President Trump is a staunch supporter of our Second Amendment right, whereas Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and the Democrat Party are for gun control. See:

Given these poll findings — of a decline in Americans’ support for gun control — it’s all the more curious that supposedly Biden won the 2020 presidential election.

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Vimeo goes to the dark side: Censors video on Black Lives Matter’s connection with Chinese Communist Party

Several years ago, when YouTube began censoring videos for political reasons, especially videos on the Sandy Hook false flag, some of us sought refuge at Vimeo, a NYC-headquartered video hosting, sharing, and services platform with more than 200 million members across more than 150 countries. Unlike YouTube, Vimeo operates on an ad-free basis, deriving its revenue from  subscriptions by video content producers, and other services.

Since 2017, Vimeo’s CEO is Anjali Sud, 37, who was born in Flint, Michigan, of Indian immigrants.

But video producers can no longer go to Vimeo as a refuge from political censorship. Vimeo has gone to the dark side, joining YouTube, Facebook, Google, and Twitter in restricting or censoring content dispproved by the Left.

Fred Lucas reports for The Daily Signal, Oct. 29, 2020, that Vimeo has removed a video critical of apparent connections between the Chinese Communist Party and a founder of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) organization. 

New Zealand investigative journalist and author Trevor Loudon told The Daily Signal in a phone interview that he had posted on Vimeo for only “a few hours” and had about 1,600 viewers before Vimeo took it down: “It really touched a nerve for Vimeo to take it down after just a few hours.”

The 6-minute video, produced by Choose Freedom, a conservative group with which Loudon is associated, highlights various connections among activists. One group is Asians for Black Lives, founded by members of the Chinese Progressive Association of San Francisco, a pro-China group with ties to the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party. The video also underlines connections between the San Francisco-based Chinese Progressive Association and Black Futures Lab, a group started by Black Lives Matter co-founder Alicia Garza.

Kevin Roose

The Daily Signal first reported on the connection between China and the Black Futures Lab in an analysis by Mike Gonzalez, a senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation and former editorial writer and reporter for The Wall Street Journal.

Gonzalez’s reporting was immediately criticized by left-leaning media outlets, including New York Times reporter Kevin Roose.

Vimeo sent Loudon this message:

Your video ‘BLM and Communist China’ has been removed for violating our guidelines. Reason: You cannot upload videos that depict or encourage self-harm, falsely claim that mass tragedies are hoaxes, or perpetuate false or misleading claims about vaccine safety.

Loudon said he didn’t see how the video fits into any of the categories: “They said it violated their community standards,” Loudon said. “I think it upset the [Chinese] Communist Party, or the local communists, or both.”

Here’s the video, which is also posted on Rumble and The Daily Signal.

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by a military veteran!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

The video the MSM doesn’t want you to see, RITTENHOUSE

Kyle Rittenhouse cleaning graffiti left by vandals

Only the fascist left domestic terrorist supporting democrat controlled propaganda fake news would stoop so low to attack a law abiding 17 year old American patriot.  Instead of being truthful and saying Kyle Rittenhouse defended himself, they chose to blow smoke up everyone on this planet’s  a$%’s.

 

“The teenager with the long gun scuffled with people near a car dealership and opened fire, allegedly killing two people and wounding a third, a criminal complaint says. Even as police and emergency vehicles raced to the scene and chaotic videos of the fatal encounter appeared on social media, the armed suspect walked past a group of officers unnoticed. He was arrested 30 miles awayin Antioch, Illinois.”

Faith Karimi, CNN

That’s how fake news CNN is spinning a Kenosha shooting where 3 democrat supported adult fascist left domestic terrorist were shot when they attacked a minor, 17 year old Kyle Rittenhouse.

Rittenhouse was 1 of many volunteers that were cleared by law enforcement and were protecting  businesses from being destoyed by democrat supported fascists left domestic terrorist Black Lives Matter(BLM)/Antifa, Muslim Extremists and foreign nationals that have entered the country illegally and are working with BLM causing discourse,  attacking Americans and trying to influence our elections.

 

The defenders stopped the terrorist from burning down a gas station.  They also stopped the terrorist from attacking the police with a flaming dumpster.

The terrorist next move was to set the car lot on fire where Rittenhouse was standing guard.

Video shows convicted felon sex offender terrorist Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, chasing Rittenhouse through the car lot.  Rosenbaum can be seen throwing a molotov(claims eyewitness) at Rittenhouse. We hear a gunshot from unknown source .Rittonhouse turns and shoots seconds before Rosenbaum could grab him.  Rosenbaum goes down and we hear more gunfire from unknown source again.

Rittonhouse goes over to where Rosenbaum is laying and offers help. He calls the police.

A person then decides to use his shirt instead of the first aid kit Rittenhouse was carrying.  The same person tells Rittenhouse to go.away.

Rittenhouse starts making his way to the police line and a mob of domestic terrorist start chasing him.   He trips an falls.  While on the ground a unidentified terrorist runs up and kicks him in the head.  While still on the ground, he gets hit in the head with a skateboard carried by convicted felon and domestic terrorist,  26 year old, Anthony Huber.  Rittenhouse takes the skateboard hit and shoots Huber.

Then convicted felon and domestic  terrorist, 26 year old

Gaige Grosskreutz, armed with a handgun goes after Rittenhouse.  Grosskreutz raises his gun and Rittenhoust shoots him in the arm.

Rittenhouse makes his way to the police where he turns himself in.

Police let him go.

Currently charges have been filed on Rittenhouse which if convicted, could give him a life sentence.

Charges were filed before any sort of criminal investigation took place.  At the time there wasn’t  a crime scene investigation, no ballistic data, meaning they don’t  know if Rittenhouse was the only shooter. Video clearly shows he shot in self defense.

Besides the fact that these were convicted felons attacking a minor, they were terrorist in the act of committing crimes. They had already helped burn and destroy other buildings in the city.

CNN and other fake news outlets are lying about what really happened.

So you can decide for yourself, I found as many videos of that night that I could find.  I placed them in order creating a visual timeline of events.  Keep in mind that these are the actual videos captured by reporters on the scene. I haven’t  blurred anything out so you will be seeing shooting, blood and bodies.  That’s your warning.

This is for educational  purposes only.

 

Rittenhouse doesn’t look like the mass shooter that some media outlets describe him.

Really makes you wonder why they are lying.

The person that interviewed Rittenhouse was 10 feet away from Rosenbaum when he got shot.  He also helped carry Rosenbaum to the car.  He was also at the hospital with Rosenbaum.  You would think that being a reporter he would have some video from the hospital.  They covered every other part of the event.  This is the reporter,

 

This is a short video of the day after.

Is Rittenhouse a Patriot or not?  I going with Patriot.

I have to be honest.  I feel like I just watched a poorly scripted reality show.  But what do I know.

Sources

Photos and video captured by the following people:

Andy Ngo

Drew Hernandez

Brendan Gutenschwager

RichieMcGinniss

Julio_Rosas11

Elijah Schaffer

ShelbyTalcott

FromKalen

 

Apologies if I missed anyone.

“Rittenhouse” and “The next day” are unlisted videos.  They are not monetized.  I made them to share information to the public, free as charged.  For educational purposes only. Fair use.

Respectfully,

Deplorable Patriot

Correction- Rittenhouse did not call police after first shooting.  He actually called a friend of his.

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Crisis actors in anti-Trump #BLM protests

We simply cannot believe anything that we see in TV and mainstream media news.

Among the profusion of George Floyd #BlackLivesMatter protests and riots across the country are crisis actors.

Here are two examples:

(1) Below is a screenshot of a Craigslist ad soliciting 500 “actors” for a protest at the Phoenix Convention Center. The ad specifically seeks “actors” who are “anti-Trump racial minorities”. H/t tweeter @MunkeyPilot.

(2) The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that a much-photographed and -reported “Black Panthers” group at protests in cities across the state of Georgia “came straight from central casting”.

Chris Joyner reports for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, June 11, 2020: 

They said they were Black Panthers, and they looked the part with all-black attire and black berets adorned with a cat-head patch. Their leader was a tall, thin black woman armed with an assault rifle and a determined look. Photos of the group popped up in local news outlets, including The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, but also in the British tabloid press….

It is easy to see why the group attracted attention. In a moment of fury over police shootings of black people, the group was perfectly cast. Maybe too perfect.

Within a few days, an activist on Twitter sussed out that the group was comprised of models and actors from Atlanta’s film and entertainment industries. A Twitter user who goes by Wolf The Red identified them from their Instagram accounts where he found the group modeling haute couture or publicizing their film credits, but “zero prior demonstrations. No posts with guns. No calls to action.”

The AJC reached out to members of the group, including Whitney Oni, the striking woman who drew so much attention. Oni, an Atlanta-based graphic designer and model, said…she believed it was “important to use my voice.”

And to dress the part.

“The outfits? We just pulled inspiration from (the Black Panthers),” she said. “It was mostly black and leather — pleather. Some of us are vegans, vegetarians.”

And they were close. The patch, for instance, was a Black Panther patch — just not those Black Panthers. It was the service patch for the 66th Infantry, a U.S. Army Division during World War II.

Spiike G., who works in the Atlanta movie industry but who declined to give his real name, said…he got the idea to dress as Black Panthers because he wanted to be a “symbol of hope” in the sea of protesters….

Both Spiike and Oni claim the guns were real. Spiike said his was a Springfield Saint AR15; Oni carried a Smith & Wesson 22LR assault rifle.

“I’m trying to show a certain amount of force, but something that was appropriate for a protest,” she said.

Spiike is the creator of an online independent television series called “Justice,” where a black vigilante hero tracks down bad cops and gets retribution for their racist violence. A lot of the gear worn by the helmeted hero looks very much like that worn by his group in protests.

See also:

~Eowyn

Drudge Report has gone to the dark side. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

George Floyd. 3 Minutes of resisting arrest. The video Fake News didn’t want you to see?

 

Video footage the MSM fake news conveniently kept out of their “breaking news story” has surfaced  of George Floyd resisting arrest for around three minutes .

Would this have stopped the riots? No. Fake news had made their minds up.  They were going do their part at destroying the country.  They were sticking to the plan.

*”One of the most obvious ways to tell I’f a event could be faked is paying attention to the news release. It’s  a dead giveaway when you see all the networks releasing the same exact story, at the same time.”

This video just adds to the long list  of events that fake news got caught at “faking news”.

There you have it.  Floyd did indeed resist arrest.  The entire fake news complex lied to you, again.  They specifically said Floyd didn’t resist arrest.

This is just another example why I quit believing everything the news media puts out..  Some might think that’s a little extreme.  No. It’s  the only logical, smart solution.  The days of me saying “they lie sometimes but usually they are pretty honest”  were gone long ago.  If you say you can tell the difference simply by using your best judgement, all you are really doing is selecting what you feel comfortable with. That does not make it true.

People saw the video.  They saw Floyd die.. Somebody mentioned in the comment section in a prior post of mine.  Something along the lines that “it’s  going to take more than different time stamps to change my mind”.

Five simple points, out of many.

  1. MSM lies all the time
  2. “Floyd is dead because the video shows it.”  Yes, the video looks like someone got killed or died of something. .. I get it, you’re convinced.  Now go turn on your TV or watch your favorite movie on the internet.   Why do you watch what you are watching?  It’s because the character’s seem real.  A block buster movie only becomes a hit if the movie is good.  This requires the actors  being skilled enough to convince you the roles the play are real..  Seeing is no longer believing.   If you believe Floyd is dead because it was captured on video, then you have to believe everything in all movies/videos  are true.
  3. If we wanted to use a video deposition in court, most states require the date/time to be burned into the video at the time of recording.  If the date is off/time is off, they cannot be used in court.  All the videos  times were different..  Floyd videos should not be legit evidence in court.  *Time/ date can be faked in any video.  Even when time of recording is hurned into video.
  4. To convict, there cannot be a reasonable doubt.   Time/date or  anything  else that’s  seemd wrong with this event causes reasonable doubt.  Innocent until proven guilty.
  5. Reliability of source of video.

I use the MSM as leads.  Then I investigate the story myself. But to each their own.

Fake ot not , some have come out ahead because of Floyd’s death.

  • Floyd family got millions in donations. Fame and fortune.
  • Black LIves Matter seemed to grow in numbers.  They assaulted and killed police officers which continues at this very moment.  They ignore   black on black deaths., or any other death in the black community..  They’ve actually got people giving in to their demands..  Some are actually kneeling for them, because BLM expects it.  .  Yes, they have been successful proving racism and bigotry exist in America.  BlM being perhaps the most openly racist group to ever exist in America..
  • Let’s not forget the 35 million and more BLM has received  in donations..  Unfortunate for them,  the people handling their money, the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF) has only spent  $200,000 of the money on bail money for protesters.  They haven’t  said where the rest of the money went.  MFF deleted the board members(which are almost all white) page on their site and they quit accepting donations.  They already admitted on Twitter that ” the donations are turned over to ACTBLUE.  ACTBLUE then give it to the democrats”.  That’s  because ACTBLUE is part of the Democrat party. Looks like the democrats hustled BLM.  Watch, BLM will still support democrats. Ok
  • Democrats have shown how much they love their voter base by allowing out of town rioters to destroy their cities, their  businesses, get assaulted, killed and have their whole lives destoyed.
  • Biden says Floyd is more important than MLK.
  • Science makes discovery that protesting will keep you safe from getting covid19 but attending church, working, etc, increases your chance to get the virus.
  • The first time in history that a transperson parent got to fight alongside their transchildren and transhgrandkids with their trans dog and trans bird. Take over American soil.  They did this through violence and   declared their own country.  Perhaps the #1 country of starving people because the homeless stole all the food the firds day.
  • The first time a unknown rapper declares himself the police after removing the police because they didn’t want police there.  He also declares himself to be leader of country by beating and who knows what.  Proving the people with guns win. Tupac  and biggie would be proud.
  • Floyd  so influential and important that he gets minute by minute coverage the day he is buried.  He gets second by second camera coverage from helicopter  of his car as it travels to his resting grounds. The man is treated like a Saint, even though he was a hardened thug who died while being arrested for committing a crime that is a violation of federal law , which can carry a sentence  of 20 years.
  • Police are getting replaced and now, just as I predicted, democrats are going after their weapons.
  • Muslims love the replacing the police with something like community police.  Perfect because to Muslims, community police is religion police or the morality police.  That gives them a chance to bring in Sharia  law.

Minneapolis is home to the largest population of Somali in the USA.  That means Muslim. You can be sure a Muslim controlled replacement for the police is ready to fill the spot.

I find it unusual that CUP FOODS is also the address of a Mosque.  Yes, they have a Mosque in the basement.  An “underground Mosque”. Now you know it’s  true.  They exist.

I mentioned earlier  about the video source being reliable. There is some evidence that the owner(from Palestine)of Cup Foods might have had some animosity toward the police.

That area of town is a hotspot for crime.  Cup Foods being a hotspot for drug trafficking.

The owners  son is a convicted felon who has been to prison. The business has been in trouble with the law in the past.  Both the owner and son have criminal records.

This document will explain the situation better than I.

 

CUP Foods, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, and its President Samir Hamaden Abumayyaleh, Relators, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent. C2-01-399, Court of Appeals Published, September 11, 2001.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN COURT OF APPEALS

C2-01-399

CUP Foods, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, and its President Samir Hamaden Abumayyaleh,

Relators,

vs.

City of Minneapolis,

Respondent.

Filed September 11, 2001

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded

G. Barry Anderson, Judge

City of Minneapolis

Docket No. 9-2110-12612-3

Ronald I. Meshbesher, Jonathan M. Peck, Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd., 1616 Park Avenue, Minneapolis, MN  55404 (for relators)

Jay M. Heffern, Minneapolis City Attorney, Scott Reeves, Assistant Minneapolis City Attorney, 300 Metropolitan Centre, 333 South Seventh Street, Minneapolis, MN  55402 (for respondent)

Considered and decided by G. Barry Anderson, Presiding Judge, R.A. Randall, Judge, and Robert H. Schumacher, Judge.

S Y L L A B U S

If an agency adopts the findings and conclusions of an administrative law judge, but rejects or significantly deviates from the recommendations of that judge and does not make findings explaining the deviation, the decision is arbitrary and capricious, and the case should be remanded for the agency to make findings explaining its decision to deviate.

O P I N I O N

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge

Respondent city stayed revocation of relator’s business licenses subject to store closure for six months and compliance thereafter with several conditions.  Relator argues that respondent’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and that the sanction was arbitrary and capricious.  Relator also argues that the administrative law judge (ALJ) abused her discretion by denying his motion to strike testimony concerning controlled drug buys.  We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support respondent city’s finding of good cause for adverse license action against relator.  In addition, because relator did not make a timely motion to strike, we conclude that the ALJ acted within her discretion by denying the motion.  But because respondent deviated from the ALJ’s recommendations when imposing its sanction, without making findings explaining the reasons for doing so, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

In 1989, relator Samir Abumayyaleh opened a convenience store at the northeast corner of 38th Street and Chicago Avenue South in Minneapolis.  The store sold groceries and the usual convenience items.  Eventually, relator added numerous goods and services to the store, including a delicatessen, cellular phone and pager sales, tobacco products, and off-sale 3.2 beer.

Respondent City of Minneapolis issued CUP Foods (Chicago Unbeatable Prices) four licenses: (1) grocery store; (2) food manufacturer; (3) tobacco dealer; and (4) off-sale 3.2 beer vendor.  Respondent first issued the licenses in 1989 and each is subject to annual renewal.  Relator’s family, including his father and two younger brothers, work at the store, but relator also employs other workers.  Relator’s younger brother Nabil, known as “Billy,” one of the store employees, has a prior felony conviction for auto theft.

CUP Foods is located in a high-crime area of Minneapolis and, not surprisingly, experienced problems with loitering and drug activity in and around the store.  In 1991, relator complained to respondent about the loitering problem, and at a city crime specialist’s recommendation, relator placed two yellow “no trespassing” signs outside his store.  Respondent conditioned relator’s licenses on reduced hours of operation.  On several occasions, however, the store remained open after the designated closing time.

In 1993, after receiving additional complaints about loitering and drug activity near CUP Foods, respondent scheduled a committee meeting to consider adverse license action.  As a result of the meeting, relator agreed to remove public pay phones, hire off-duty police officers for security, reduce hours of operation, hire older employees for evening shifts, report drug activity to police, and remove signs blocking store windows.  Relator understood that failure to comply with the agreed-on conditions could result in revocation, suspension, or non-renewal of his licenses.  Relator complied with the conditions, including the employment of off-duty police officers as security guards.  But approximately one-year later, relator discontinued their employment because of the cost and because “things got a lot better at the intersection.”

As time went on, however, the crime problem at 38th and Chicago became worse.  In 1996, neighborhood residents formed a task force to improve safety and reduce drug-dealing activity in the neighborhood.  In 1998, the number of complaints concerning CUP Foods prompted police community crime specialists to open a file on the store.  Crime-prevention specialists visited CUP Foods and relator signed a Minneapolis “no trespassing” affidavit and received two new “no trespassing” signs.  The specialists advised relator to call 911 to report trouble, and he and his employees did so.

On July 13, 1998, a shooting took place near CUP Foods.  Shortly thereafter, relator attended a task-force meeting and asked for a greater police presence at the intersection.  A few months later, two more shootings took place near CUP Foods.

Beginning in October 1998, police conducted surveillance of CUP Foods.  Police observed loitering and hand-to-hand exchanges outside the store and in the store entryway.  Using confidential informants, police made several “controlled buys” of either crack cocaine or apparent crack cocaine inside CUP Foods.

Based on the results of the controlled buys, police obtained a search warrant for CUP Foods and executed that warrant on November 18, 1998.  Police recovered: stolen cell phones; a bullet-proof vest; live ammunition; a stolen bicycle; ephedrine, an ingredient in methamphetamine; glass tubing; baggies of what appeared to be crack cocaine (but later proved to lack cocaine base); postal scales; and three firearms.  Police also observed bullet holes in a door.  The state charged Nabil Abumayyaleh with unlawful possession of a firearm, but later dismissed that charge.  Police did not link any of the stolen items to relator, and did not charge him with any crime.

Police continued to make controlled buys in CUP Foods during 1999.  On one occasion, the participants completed a transaction in plain view of Nabil Abumayyaleh as he worked as a cashier.  On November 9, 1999, a Minneapolis police officer recovered crack cocaine from a CUP Foods shelf during the course of answering a call reporting an armed man in the area.

In November 1999, the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office commenced a nuisance-abatement proceeding against CUP Foods.  That proceeding was stayed pending the city’s resolution of appellant’s licensing issues because, on November 19, 1999, respondent filed a notice of hearing concerning all CUP Foods licenses.  Respondent filed amended notices on February 25, 2000, and again on March 27, 2000.

An ALJ conducted evidentiary hearings on March 28, 30, and 31, and on May 5 and 15, 2000.  Respondent presented testimony from police and neighbors, and argued for revocation of relator’s licenses.  Relator presented favorable testimony from neighbors and customers, testified to his own compliance with recommendations, and explained that he, too, sought to end the criminal activity near the intersection.

The ALJ concluded that respondent had shown good cause for taking adverse action against CUP Foods, but recommended that the city council consider placing conditions on CUP Foods licenses, rather than revoking the licenses outright.  On December 29, 2000, the Minneapolis City Council adopted the ALJ’s report but, rather than placing conditions on relator’s business licenses, it revoked all the licenses, stayed on the conditions that CUP Foods (1) close for six months and (2) take additional specified crime-prevention measures upon re-opening.  The council, however, waived 90 days of the closure period, upon relator’s payment of a $10,000 administrative fine.  The mayor approved the decision on January 4, 2001.  Relator now proceeds by writ of certiorari.

ISSUES

I.                    Was respondent city’s decision to stay revocation of relator’s business licenses, subject to conditions, a denial of due process, arbitrary and capricious, or unsupported by substantial evidence?

II.                 Did the ALJ violate relator’s right to due process of law by denying relator the opportunity to cross-examine confidential informants who made controlled buys at CUP Foods?

ANALYSIS

I.

            Appellant first argues that respondent city’s decision to revoke his business licenses is arbitrary and capricious, is unreasonable, is irrational, and not supported by substantial evidence, and that it violates his due-process rights because neither relator nor his employees had direct knowledge that drug activity took place inside CUP Foods.

Generally, decisions of administrative agencies, including cities, enjoy a presumption of correctness and will be reversed only when they reflect an error of law or where the findings are arbitrary, capricious, or unsupported by substantial evidence.  Cable Communications Bd. v. Nor-West Cable Communications P’ship,356 N.W.2d 658, 668 (Minn. 1984); see alsoMinn. Stat. § 14.69 (2000) (setting forth the scope of judicial review).

 Where the evidence is conflicting or more than one inference may be drawn from the evidence, findings must be upheld.  City of Minneapolis v. Richardson,307 Minn. 80, 88, 239 N.W.2d 197, 202 (1976).  If the agency engaged in reasoned decision-making, a reviewing court will affirm its decision even though the court may have reached another conclusion. State by Khalifa v. Hennepin County,420 N.W.2d 634, 639 (Minn. App. 1988), review denied (Minn. May 4, 1988). 

A.         Due Process

            Relator argues that respondent’s decision denies him “due process of law.”  To determine what process is due, this court first determines whether a property interest is implicated.  Humenansky v. Minnesota Bd. of Med. Exam’rs,525 N.W.2d 559, 566 (Minn. App. 1994), review denied(Minn. Feb. 14, 1995).  Relator correctly points out that he has a property interest in his business licenses.  See Bird v. Dep’t of Pub. Safety,375 N.W.2d 36, 42 (Minn. App. 1985) (finding property interest in automobile dealer’s license).  Our second inquiry requires weighing the particular interests involved. Humenansky,525 N.W.2d at 566. 

Sufficient due process generally requires reasonable notice and a hearing.  In re License of W. Side Pawn,587 N.W.2d 521, 522 (Minn. App. 1998), review denied (Minn. Mar. 30, 1999).  Although relator argues that he was denied due process, he does not allege that he was denied either reasonable notice or an opportunity to be heard.  The record shows relator received initial notice of the hearings approximately four months before the license proceedings, a five-day trial-type hearing, representation by counsel, an impartial decision-maker, and a decision based solely on the record.  This is sufficient to satisfy the due-process requirement.  See Humenansky,525 N.W.2d at 565 (describing the process due when property interests are implicated).

B.         Substantial Evidence

Relator argues that respondent violated his due-process rights because revocation

extinguishes [relator’s] property interest and deprives [relator] from making a living without a factual finding that either [relator] or any of his employees permitted, encouraged, or had any direct knowledge of the alleged controlled buys.

In essence, relator alleges that respondent lacked substantial evidence of “good cause” to take adverse license action against relator’s business.

 Substantial evidence, for the purpose of appellate review of an administrative agency’s decision, is: (1) such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion; (2) more than a scintilla of evidence; (3) more than some evidence; (4) more than any evidence; and (5) evidence considered in its entirety.  In re Friedenson,574 N.W.2d 463, 467 (Minn. App. 1998) (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr. 30, 1998).  We defer to the agency’s fact-finding process and it is the challenger’s burden to establish that the findings are not supported by the evidence.  In re Lakedale Tel. Co.,561 N.W.2d 550, 554 (Minn. App. 1997).  Unless manifestly unjust, inferences must be accepted even though it may appear that contrary inferences would be better supported by the record.  Id.  Thus, relator must show that the evidence, considered in its entirety, and drawing inferences in favor of the decision, is not substantial, and, therefore, does not adequately support respondent’s finding that good cause existed to take adverse action against his business licenses.

The Minneapolis Code of Ordinances provides that “[a]ny license granted under this chapter may be revoked by the mayor or the city council as in the city charter provided.”   Minneapolis, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 188.350 (1999).  The city charter provides:

Section 16.  Licenses May Be Revoked.  Any license issued by the authority of the City Council may be revoked by the City Council at any time upon proper notice and hearing for good cause * * * .

Minneapolis, Minn., City Charter ch. 4, § 16.

The ALJ’s memorandum explained that relator’s employment of his brother Nabil Abumayyaleh, a convicted felon, and the handguns found during the search of CUP Foods, did not warrant taking adverse license action against relator because relator legally employed his brother and legally possessed the handguns for protection.  Similarly, the ALJ found that, because respondent failed to link any of the stolen items recovered during execution of the 1998 search warrant to relator, that evidence alone did not support adverse license action.  Further, the ALJ found that the three shootings near CUP Foods had no connection to the store and were simply a “by-product of the gang violence that is prevalent in this south Minneapolis neighborhood.”

But respondent, through the testimony of police officers and neighbors, presented evidence of: (1) chronic loitering at CUP Foods; (2) numerous hand-to-hand exchanges, an indication of drug dealing, taking place in and outside the store; and (3) controlled drug buys inside the store.  Respondent also presented evidence that despite the earlier license conditions, the store’s windows remain obstructed by advertising, signs, and shelving, and that the lack of visibility inside the store hampers law-enforcement efforts.

For these reasons, the city council adopted the ALJ’s conclusion that

[respondent] has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that drug dealing and loitering have occurred on a frequent basis on and near CUP Foods’ premises.  * * * [Relator’s] failure or inability to prevent or meaningfully control the sale of drugs occurring inside his store constitutes good cause for taking adverse action against CUP Foods’ licenses. While [relator] testified that he routinely asks loiterers to leave, substantial credible testimony from neighborhood residents and police officers established that there is an ongoing pattern of loitering and drug dealing both inside the store and outside the store’s front entrance.  And, despite some measures taken by [relator] to increase visibility in his store, the record established that the majority of the store’s windows remain obstructed by shelving, advertisements, and other signage.  The inability to see into the store’s windows encourages loitering and criminal activity in general at CUP Foods.

Although there is no direct evidence that relator or his employees observed drug transactions, there is ample evidence, including the evidence of the controlled buys, that such transactions took place in and around CUP Foods and that relator knew that crime in and near the store was an ongoing problem.  Although relator made efforts to improve security and reduce crime, he failed to decrease the height of store shelves or remove window advertisements, and, until very recently, relator had abandoned the use of security guards.

Drawing inferences in favor of respondent city’s decision, as we must, and viewing the record as a whole, we conclude that the evidence, though hardly overwhelming, is reasonable, “more than a scintilla,” “more than some,” and “more than any” evidence.  The evidence, therefore, is substantial and supports the conclusion that respondent had “good cause” to take adverse license action against relator.[1] 

C.        Arbitrary and capricious

Relator also argues that the adverse license action is arbitrary and capricious.  Reviewing courts may reverse an agency’s decision if the decision is arbitrary or capricious.  Minn. Stat. § 14.69(f) (2000).  An agency decision is arbitrary and capricious if it is an exercise of the agency’s will, rather than its judgment, or if the decision is based on whim or is devoid of articulated reasons. Friedenson,574 N.W.2d at 467;Mammenga v. State Dept. of Human Servs.,442 N.W.2d 786, 789 (Minn. 1989).  “Where there is room for two opinions on the matter, [an agency’s choice of one course of] action is not arbitrary and capricious * * * .”  Friedenson,574 N.W.2d at 467 (citing Brown v. Wells,288 Minn. 468, 472, 181 N.W.2d 708, 711 (1970)).     

The problems at CUP Foods illustrate the collision between two important principles of United States jurisprudence: the reasonable public safety expectations of citizens and the preservation of private property rights, which, in this case, take the form of business licenses.

A city council may affirm, reject, or modify an ALJ’s findings or conclusions.  See Hymanson v. City of St. Paul,329 N.W.2d 324, 326-27 (Minn. 1983) (a city council may make new findings or decide contrary to the hearing examiner’s recommendations).   Despite this authority, when an agency significantly deviates from a reviewing authority’s conclusions, it must explain the deviation.  Beaty v. Minnesota Bd. of Teaching,354 N.W.2d 466, 472 (Minn. App. 1984).  Failure to do so “evidences the agency’s desire to exercise its will and not its judgment.”  Id.see also Burnett v. Stearns County Welfare Bd.,370 N.W.2d 452, 455 (Minn. App. 1985) (holding county welfare board acted arbitrarily and capriciously by rejecting without comment merit system council recommendation to grant relator a merit increase).  But see Friedenson,574 N.W.2d at 467-68 (holding revocation of relator’s medical license not arbitrary and capricious, even though board failed to explain its reasons for deviating from ALJ’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, because reviewing court was satisfied penalty was the product of “careful and prudent judgment”).  

Respondent adopted the ALJ’s findings, as well as the conclusions supported by those findings.  But respondent did not adopt the ALJ’s recommendations to place conditions on relator’s business licenses, and instead stayed revocation on the conditions that CUP Foods close for six months and, upon re-opening, comply with numerous crime-prevention measures.  Respondent significantly deviated from the ALJ’s recommendations without explaining why the ALJ’s recommendations were rejected or making additional findings to support this disposition.  At a minimum, a business owner with property rights in the form of government licenses is entitled to know the reasons for adverse action by the city council.  We therefore hold that the absence of such findings renders the respondent city’s decision arbitrary and capricious, and we reverse and remand for additional proceedings and to permit respondent to make appropriate findings explaining its decision.

We caution respondent, however, that any additional findings or conclusions it may adopt on remand, to explain its reasons for significantly deviating from the ALJ’s recommendations, must be limited to the issues raised in the earlier proceedings.  See Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Bd. of Comm’rs, 617 N.W.2d 566, 580 (Minn. 2000); Earthburners, Inc. v. County of Carlton, 513 N.W.2d 460, 463 (Minn. 1994) (reviewing board “must confine its inquiry to those issues raised in [the] earlier proceedings”); White Bear Rod & Gun Club v. City of Hugo, 388 N.W.2d 739, 742 (Minn. 1986) (city council not required to make formal findings but, at a minimum, must “‘have the reasons for its decision recorded or reduced to writing and in more than just a conclusory fashion’” (quotation omitted)). 

II.

            Relator also argues that the ALJ abused her discretion by denying relator’s motion to strike testimony concerning the confidential informants who completed “controlled buys” inside CUP Foods, contending that by failing to strike that testimony the ALJ denied him his right to confront the informants.  Evidentiary rulings in administrative proceedings are subject to an abuse-of-discretion standard.  See Lee v. Lee,459 N.W.2d 365, 369 (Minn. App. 1990) (applying abuse-of-discretion standard to appeal of evidentiary ruling on hearsay evidence made during an administrative child-support hearing conducted under Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act rules), review denied(Minn. Oct. 18, 1990).

During the license hearings, respondent’s counsel questioned Sherry Appledorn, the police officer who arranged the controlled buys, about her conversations with the confidential informants.  Relator’s counsel objected on hearsay grounds.  The ALJ sustained the objection, but permitted the officer to testify concerning matters within her own knowledge.  At the close of the hearings, relator moved to strike all testimony concerning the controlled buys on the basis that he was denied the right to confront the informants.  The ALJ ruled that the request was untimely.  Respondent argues that this court need not reach the issue of confrontation because relator’s motion to strike was untimely.  We agree.

The rule that an objection to the admission of evidence must be made at the time the evidence is offered is well established.  Eilola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.,201 Minn. 77, 79, 275 N.W. 408, 409 (1937); see also Minn. R. Evid. 103(a)(1) (providing that there is no error unless an evidentiary ruling affects a substantial right of a party and a timely objection or motion to strike is made).  Although relator objected to out-of-court statements made by the informants as hearsay, relator did not (1) bring any motion to compel respondent to disclose the informants’ identities, even though the initial notice of hearing indicated that the controlled buys would be part of respondent’s evidence, or (2) object to the admission of Appledorn’s testimony concerning her knowledge of the controlled buys until the close of the hearing in May 2000, more than one month after she testified.  We therefore conclude that the ALJ acted within her discretion by denying relator’s motion to strike, and we decline to further address relator’s confrontation claims.

D E C I S I O N

Respondent’s conclusion that there is good cause to take adverse license action against relator is supported by substantial evidence.  Respondent’s decision to deviate from the sanctions recommended by the ALJ, however, is arbitrary and capricious because the deviations are significant and respondent did not make findings explaining its decision to deviate.  Finally, the ALJ did not abuse her discretion by denying relator’s motion to strike testimony concerning controlled drug buys because the motion was untimely.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

[1]Relator devotes more than three pages of his brief to a discussion of Saxon Coffee Shop, Inc. v. Boston Lic. Bd.,407 N.E.2d 311 (Mass. 1980).  In Saxon,a license-revocation action, criminal activity inside a store and the non-cooperation of the store’s management did not meet the substantial-evidence test.  Id at 319.  We reject Saxon’sreasoning because City of Mankato v. Mahony,542 N.W.2d 689 (Minn. App. 1996), suggests that a city may take adverse-license action in response to criminal activity if the licensee does not cooperate to prevent future violations.  Id. at 692 (reversing revocation of landlord’s license where landlord acted responsibly to prevent further violations of city noise codes). 

Source

Perhaps Floyd and the business was doing a drug deal.  When Floyd was on the ground, leaning against Dragon Wok, an officer leaned over and picked something up off the ground and put it in his pocket.  Maybe it was just a dime or something.

False Flag or not, the whole situation has the Democrats name written all over it.  It’s  only going to get worse until election  day.

Respectfully

Deplorable Patriot.

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Evidence points to CNN and Shaun King guilty of fabricating George Floyd video.

 

More  and more information related to this event becomes available daily.  In an effort to not be fake news. I will be updating this post often..  For example, The original version of this post was based on a video that lead  me to believe the event happened on one street.  Later on after posting, a new, more complete video became available.  Irregardless,  my opinion on this event will not change.  I believe this event was staged. The embedded recording times in the  videos iis the proof. That is the focus of this post/research.  If  the information was not related to the video time, chances are I didn’t  include it. Sometimes too much information can be confusing and unnecessary once you have proven your point.  I believe this is one of those situations.  Any information I include that does not support my point, I do so in the spirit of information  sharing.

 

Update- Body cam footage  worn by officer driving “Park Police” vehicle has different  embedded time  and  date in video.  That’s  3 different recording times  for 3 different  video’s  of the same event.

Given the obvious importance of accurate time and date in body cam videos. Real police officers would be sure time was correct.  

 

 

 

Continue reading

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Pandemic a planned “scamdemic”?

 

 

 

We have learned in the past that False Flag events can leave a trail.  What sort of trail?  False Flag events require people. A “people trail”.

We’ve  all seen “crises actors”.  Some we have seen at multiple events.  These people are sourced from a variety of places.  One method to recruit people is through advertising.  Want ads/ Craig’slist, etc. The simplest  would be advertising on your website.

But we are not talking about crises  actors today.  We are talking about real educated  professionals. Actual scientist..

Who they are does not matter.  What matters,  is the time, position, location, skills required, job details and how long the job is for.  We also need to keep in mind as to why these people were hired.

Conveniently, they were hired right before the covid-19 outbreak.

The following can be found on the CDC  website.   It can be found under jobs.

Be sure to take the time to read all of it.

This was posted on 11_15/2019

 

 

Job ID HHS-CDC-D3-20-10640010 Date posted 11/15/2019 Location Dallas, Texas, El Paso, Texas, Houston, Texas, Seattle, Washington, Anchorage, Alaska, Los Angeles, California, San Diego, California, San Francisco, California, Miami, Florida, Atlanta, Georgia, Honolulu, Hawaii, Chicago, Illinois, Boston, Massachusetts, Detroit, Michigan, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Newark, New Jersey, New York, New York, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, San Juan

Department: Department of Health And Human Services
Agency: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Job Announcement Number: HHS-CDC-D3-20-10640010
SALARY RANGE: $51440.0 to $93077.0/Per Year
OPEN PERIOD: 2019-11-15 to 2020-05-15
SERIES & GRADE: GS–9/11AGENCY MARKETING STATEMENT:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is the agency Americans trust with their lives. As a global leader in public health, CDC is the nation’s premier health promotion, prevention, and preparedness agency. Whether we are protecting the American people from public health threats, researching emerging diseases, or mobilizing public health programs with our domestic and international partners, we rely on our employees to make a real difference in the health and well-being of people here and around the world. This position is located in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Emerging & Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Global Migration and Quarantine (DGMQ), Quarantine and Border Health Services Branch (QBHS) within various locations. Salary may be adjusted to include a Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) of 10.64% for Honolulu, Hawaii.
Salary may be adjusted to include a Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) of 3.27% for Anchorage, Alaska Salary may be adjusted to include a Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) of 3.29% for San Juan, Puerto Rico Term appointments may be shortened or extended up to a maximum of four years based on the needs of the agency without further competition. Subsequent employment for CDC positions must be through the appropriate competitive process or special employment program hiring authorities. CDC is an Equal Opportunity Employer.JOB SUMMARY:
Serves as a project representative for a program responsible for preventing the importation and spread of communicable diseases.DUTIES:
[
“Assist in planning and implementing a program for preventing the importation of communicable diseases from abroad and spread of these diseases domestically.”, “Monitor disease trends and consults with senior leaders to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to prevent the introduction/spread of communicable diseases by travelers, etiologic agents or vectors.”, “Provide technical assistance, consultation and guidance to national, state and/or local agencies; health organizations; federal, state and local law enforcement agencies; airport and seaport activities; hospital networks, and other private entities.”, “Ensure appropriate communication networks, planning documents and emergency response protocols are in place, tested and regularly updated.”, “Develop and present training to various governmental agencies and local partners on emergency response protocols, communicable diseases and quarantine activities.” ]REQUIREMENTS:
US Citizenship is required. Background Investigation is required. E-Verify: If you are selected for this position, the documentation that you present for purposes of completing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Form I-9 will be verified through the DHS “E-Verify” System. Federal law requires DHS to use the E-Verify System to verify employment eligibility of all new hires, and as a condition of continued employment obligates the new hire to take affirmative steps to resolve any discrepancies identified by the system. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is an E-Verify Participant. Direct Deposit: All Federal employees are required to have Federal salary payments made by direct deposit to a financial institution of their choosing. All qualification requirements must be met by the closing date of the announcement. One-year probationary period may be required. Travel, transportation, and moving expenses will be paid: Maybe Bargaining Unit Position: No Drug Screening Required: No Recruitment Incentive authorized: No Annual Leave for non-federal service authorized: No Research position: No Promotion potential: Yes, this position has promotion potential to GS-12. Promotion to the next grade level is at management’s discretion and is based on your meeting qualifications and time-in-grade requirements, demonstrated ability to perform the higher level duties, the continuing need for the higher level duties, and administrative approval. Promotion to the next grade level is not guaranteed and no promise of promotion is implied. Supervisory position: No Mobility Agreement Required: Yes Immunization required: YesQUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED:
Minimum Qualifications: GS-9
Applicants must have at least one year of specialized experience at or equivalent to the GS-7 in the Federal service as defined in the next paragraph. Specialized experience is experience which is directly related to the position which has equipped the applicant with the particular knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) to successfully perform the duties of the position to include experience assisting with providing advice and evaluating the effectiveness of public health programs, policies and activities. OR Have a master’s or equivalent graduate degree or 2 full years of progressively higher level graduate education leading to such a degree or LL.B. or J.D., if related. OR Have a combination of experience and education that meets 100% of the qualification requirements for this position. Minimum Qualifications: GS-11 Applicants must have one year of specialized experience at or equivalent to the GS-09 grade level of in the Federal service as defined in the next paragraph. Specialized experience is experience which is directly related to the position which has equipped the applicant with the particular knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) to successfully perform the duties of the position to include experience in planning, coordinating, developing and/or evaluating and implementing public health programs, policies, and activities. OR Have 3 years of progressively higher level graduate education leading to a Ph.D. or equivalent doctoral degree in public health or other field of study with course work directly related to the work of the position to be filled. OR Have a combination of specialized experience and graduate level education that meets 100% of the qualification requirements for this position.

HOW YOU WILL BE EVALUATED:
Once the application process is complete, a review of the resume and supporting documentation will be made and compared against your responses to the assessment questionnaire to determine if you are qualified for this job. If, after reviewing your resume and/or supporting documentation, a determination is made that you have inflated your qualifications and/or experience, you may lose consideration for this position. Please follow all instructions carefully. Errors or omissions may affect your eligibility. Category rating procedures will be used to rate and rank candidates. The category assignment is a measure of the degree to which your background matches the competencies required for this position. Qualified candidates will be ranked into one of three categories: Best Qualified, Well Qualified or Qualified. The Category Rating Process does not add veterans’ preference points but protects the rights of veterans by placing them ahead of non-preference eligibles within each category. Preference eligibles who meet the minimum qualification requirements and who have a compensable service-connected disability of at least 10 percent must be listed in the highest quality category (except in the case of scientific or professional positions at the GS-9 level or higher). Your qualifications will be evaluated on the following competencies (knowledge, skills, abilities and other characteristics).
Collaboration / PartneringContinuous DevelopmentCustomer ServiceData SynthesisNetworking and Partnership Development (2)Oral CommunicationProblem SolvingProgram AssessmentProgram Planning and DevelopmentPublic Health Information DisseminationPublic Health KnowledgeWritten Communication

BENEFITS:

OTHER INFORMATION:
Additional selections may be made within the same geographical location CDC-wide. The utilization of shared certificates within multiple Centers of the Center of Disease Control and Prevention may be used from this vacancy announcement for specialties to include but not limited to: Applied Epidemiology, Behavioral Epidemiology, Chronic Diseases, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Environmental Health, HIV/AIDS, Immunization, Infectious Diseases (e.g. Viral, Parasitic, etc.), Influenza, Malaria, Non-communicable Diseases, Outbreak Investigations, Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), Surveillance, Tropical Medicine, Tuberculosis (TB), Viral Hepatitis, and/or Zoonotic Diseases. If you are a veteran with preference eligibility and you are claiming 5-points veterans’ preference, you must submit a copy of your DD-214 or other proof of eligibility. If you are claiming 10-point veterans’ preference, you must also submit an SF-15, “Application for 10-Point Veterans’ Preference” plus the proof required by that form. For more information on veterans’ preference see http://www.fedshirevets.gov/job/vetpref/index.aspx. Males born after December 31, 1959 must be registered or exempt from Selective Service (see http://www.sss.gov). For information on “People with Disabilities” please see http://opm.gov/disability/PeopleWithDisabilities.asp
and https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/disability-employment/getting-a-job/sampleschedaletters.pdf. Interagency Career Transition Assistance Program (ICTAP)/ Career Transition Assistance Plan (CTAP): For information on how to apply as an ICTAP eligible see http://opm.gov/rif/employee_guides/career_transition.asp#ictap. To be well-qualified and exercise selection priority for this vacancy, displaced Federal employees must be rated at 85.0 or above on the rating criteria for this position. To view the questionnaire, click on the following link: https://apply.usastaffing.gov/ViewQuestionnaire/10640010 If you are unable to apply online or need to fax a document(s), view the following link for information regarding an Alternate Application.

HOW TO APPLY:

To apply for this position, you must complete the online application and submit the documentation specified in the Required Documents section. Special Notes – This announcement is being used to create an inventory of applicants for Public Health Advisor (Quarantine Program) positions and will be used to fill immediate and future needs. Applicants are encouraged to apply early in order to maximize their employment opportunities. Your application will remain in the inventory of tentatively qualified applicants. Applicants that are among the best qualified will be referred to the selecting official for consideration as requests to fill vacancies are processed by the Human Resources Office. The first cut-off date for you to be referred will be December 2, 2019. Thereafter, additional referral lists will be generated throughout the open period as vacancies occur. If further evaluation or interviews are required, you will be contacted. This is an open continuous announcement. Qualified applicants will be considered as job opportunities occur and may or may not receive further notification regarding the status of their application. A complete application package must be submitted by 11:59 PM (EST) on05/15/2020 of this announcement to receive consideration. To begin, click Apply to access the online application. You will need to be logged into your USAJOBS account to apply. If you do not have a USAJOBS account, you will need to create one before beginning the application. Follow the prompts to select your résumé and/or other supporting documents to be included with your application package. You will have the opportunity to upload additional documents to include in your application before it is submitted. Your uploaded documents may take several hours to clear the virus scan process. After acknowledging you have reviewed your application package, complete the Include Personal Information section as you deem appropriate and click to continue with the application process. You will be taken to the online application which you must complete in order to apply for the position. Complete the online application, verify the required documentation is included with your application package, and submit the application. To verify the status of your application, log into your USAJOBS account (https://my.usajobs.gov/Account/Login), all of your applications will appear on the Welcome screen. The Application Status will appear along with the date your application was last updated. For information on what each Application Status means, visit: https://www.usajobs.gov/Help/how-to/application/status/. If you cannot apply online: You are encouraged to apply online. If you are unable to apply online, please use the Alternate Application link listed in the Additional Information section of this vacancy announcement. Applicants are strongly encouraged to apply online if at all possible. Applying online, through your USAJOBS account, will expedite the application process and allow you to check your application. If you utilize the Alternate Application method, your USAJOBS account will not display this application and you will not receive status updates.

REQUIRED DOCUMENTS:
To apply for this position, you must submit a complete Application Package which includes: Your résumé showing work schedule, hours worked per week, dates of employment and duties performed. Other supporting documents: Cover Letter, optional Veterans Preference Documentation, if applicable Transcripts (if applicable)* Schedule A Eligibility Letter, if you are applying as a Schedule A candidate Interagency Career Transition Assistance Program / Career Transition Assistance Program documentation, if applicable (e.g., Certification of Expected Separation, Reduction-In-Force Separation Notice, or Notice of Proposed Removal; SF-50 that documents the RIF separation action; and most recent performance appraisal). *Note: You may submit an unofficial transcript or a list of college courses completed indicating course titles, credit hours, and grades received. An official transcript from an accredited educational institution is required if you are selected for the position. Failure to submit any of the above mentioned required documents will result in loss of consideration due to an incomplete application package. It is your responsibility to ensure all required documents have been submitted. OTHER JOB INFORMATION:
Subject to permanent reassignment to another CDC Quarantine Station or duty station as the needs of the service warrant. Subject to temporary assignment at any location in the United States and its territories or possessions, in foreign countries, or at sea. Selectee will be required to sign a Geographic Mobility Agreement. These positions are subject to shift work, weekend work, irregular work schedule and evening hours. On call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, independent of shift work assignments. The incumbents will be required to wear a uniform. The incumbent must be able to qualify for unrestricted access to secure areas at U.S ports. The incumbent must be able to qualify for a secret security clearance. The incumbent must be able to obtain an official U.S. passport. The incumbent must have a valid State government-issued driver’s license. The incumbent is required to be current in his/her immunizations per ACIP guidelines. Must undergo baseline and periodic health screening procedures such as respiratory fit testing and PPD tests for tuberculosis exposure. May be required to wear an N-95 respirator. The incumbent must be physically fit enough to work long hours and frequently travel on foot to remote gate areas in a short period of time. The incumbent must be required to provide basic quarantine station support, including purchasing, property inventory, document processing, timekeeping, and answering inquiries, etc. For Résumé and Application Tips visit: https://help.usajobs.gov/index.php/Tips.

WHAT TO EXPECT NEXT:
Once the online questionnaire is received you will receive an acknowledgement email that your submission was successful. The most highly qualified candidates will be referred to the hiring manager for further consideration and possible interview. We expect to make a selection within 45 days of the closing date of this announcement. You will receive notice via email once this process is completed (generally 4-6 weeks).

AGENCY CONTACT INFO:
CDC HELPDESK
1600 Clifton Road NE
Atlanta GA US 30333
Telephone: (770) 488-1725
Email: HRCS@CDC.GOV

I’m  not saying the pandemics was a False Flag event.  That’s  for you to decide.
The duration of employment fits the timeline of the Covid-19 outbreak.  It also fits the timeline I  pointed out in my post “Deception of the sleazoid swamp donkey. “
Taking all the factual information I have gathered. Add this to it. Add the rest of the relevant  post and comments from authors and subscribers here on FOTM. Then ask yourself two things. Why? And what are you going to do about it?
Respectfully
Deplorable Patroit
Democrat leadership are responsible for all jobs lost,all business  closures along with every hardship that is the result of ccovid-19 pandemic.

 

Source

 

 

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Fake News MSM caught lying about coronavirus infection numbers and Pelosi, Schiff, Schumer, AOC, Omar, Tlaib and over 100 politicians received dontions from virus test kit suppliers

I was asked the other day if I had been tested for covid-19.  I said “no”. The person said “why?” I responded with “It’s a waste of time and money”

Is getting tested for covid-19 a waste of time?   I’ve listed some basic information about covid-19 that people sometimes overlook.

*Sars cov-2 is the virus that causes covid-19.  In this report, to reduce confusion they both are covid-19.
  1. In the search of a cure, big pharma gets to bypass hurdles that they normally would held up at.  They get to move some of their products with fewer regulations.  This means more profit for them.
  2. “What do you do if you have covid-19?”  Nothing.  If you feels sick enough to want to go to the hospital, then go to the hospital.  If not, you just deal with it until it passes.
  3. There is no cure.
  4. Majority of people, if not all,  that die from covid-19 have underlying problems.  The problem is that when a person dies that has tested for covid-19 they often put the virus as the cause of death.  Even if that person died from underlying problems.
  5. “Testing lets us know if we have it. It will keep us from spreading the virus”.  Maybe.  Is the chance of spreading it worth the damage created by a country shut down?  How many times do we know exactly when we first came in contact with the common cold, the flu, HIV, etc?  The flu kills more people and we never shut down the country.   By the time we realize that we have the flu we could have passed it to hundreds.  Generally speaking, the average person with the flu  isn’t going to go around and give it to other people.  Of course, there are some that will.  Just like the people do with covid-19.
  6. Testing for covid-19 is a waste of time.  After being tested a person has to wait anywhere from 2 to 15 days for the results.  After 15 days you won’t need the results because you will either be sick or not.  If you find you you have it you will be asked if you feel sick.  It depends on who your results are coming from.  If you don’t feel sick you will be told to take care of yourself, stay away from others and go  to the hospital if your condition gets worse.  People that are high risk or have underlying problems may be asked to get themselves checked out.  It really depends on how you feel.  Most people that test positive will not feel anything at all.  This is what they tell people that have the flu
  7. Testing for covid-19 has not cured anyone of the virus.
  8. Hospitalization is pretty much the same for covid-19 victims as they use for people in the hospital because of the flu.
  9. Covid-19  positive people at home are told to do the same as people at home with the flu.  Covid-19 just has a bunch of hype behind it.  Factual evidence is provided toward the end of this article.
  10. There is no way to stop the virus.  The only  way to stop it 100%  is by making everyone in the world stop moving and stand in one place.  If we all stayed in one place, didn’t move an inch for the next 14 to 15 days we would stop the virus from being passed..   We would know who had it and who didn’t.  Then we could separate the infected from the non-infected and wait another 14 to 15 days for it to pass.  Then it will be done.  But that will never happen.  The shut down only slows it down.  It’s not going to stop it.  It’s not going to kill it.
  11. “What about the other things going on that are more dangerous and kill more often?  Do we shut down and hide for those to pass?”  If we did that we would never be able to leave our homes, ever.  That would be stupid.  You will never be able to get things delivered because there wouldn’t be anyone making the products to deliver.  The economy in every country would crash.  Exactly where America is heading.
  12.   Democrats want to keep America locked down for another 5 months. They want everyone to mail in their votes because cheating is the only way they can win.   If they win,  they will step in and “save the country”.  That’s how democrats do it.  They create the problem then step in and act like they are going to fix it.  “Mass shooting were not producing the results they wanted so they ran with this”

Shelter in place for another 5 months? Here’s what Stanford researchers are projecting and why.   CLARA COUNTY, Calif. (KGO) — As the Bay Area heads into another weekend of sheltering-in-place due to the novel coronavirus pandemic, many folks are asking how much longer will it take before restrictions are lifted. That’s one of the questions that a Stanford research team set out to answer by developing an interactive tool that models the spread of COVID-19 over time with interventions such as quarantine and social distancing.

“We estimate that shelter-in-place would have to remain in place for about five months or more in order to actually completely suppress the epidemic,” said Stanford biology professor Erin Mordecai.

A 5 month shut down will completely destroy our county.  That is what the democrats want. All I hear is panic that was created by democrats and the MSM .  Just about everywhere I go, all I hear about is testing.  How “we need more test”.  How “more people need to be tested”.  How “we have a shortage of tests”.   Every actor, music artist, athlete, news media outlet, everyone under the control of the democrats are trying their best to convince people that they need to test.  It’s like 1 giant advertising campaign.  And policy is not the only product being sold.

The democrats are not the only ones that have been benefiting off covid-19.  How about the suppliers of the test kits.  I’ve provided a list of some of the top providers of covid-19 supplies. This could be by coincidence but the majority of the suppliers I investigated had made political donations to the democrats.  To be fair,  some have donated to the republican party.  Still,  democrats received more money  than the republican party.

These are a few of the companies that I looked into. .  I listed  the percentage of their contributions that went to the democrats for 2018 and 2020.  On line 1 and 2 you will see a second company listed with no data.  They are owned by the same company listed on that line.  The percentages are the same.

  1. DANAHER CORP.. 88% 2020,  94% 2018.   Integrated DNA Technologies
  2. THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. PAC.  67% 2020,  56% 2018.  Qiagen
  3. LABCORP.  51% 2020, 34% 2018.
  4. CEPHEID  87% 2020, 94% 2018 .    Also owned by Danaher
  5. HOLOGIC 78% 2020, 54% 2018.

The following are some names of politicians that received donations from 1 or more of the companies listed.  This list is not complete.  It’s about 20%  complete for the companies I researched.  You will see some names listed more than once. That’s because it’s a different company.  I wouldn’t worry about seeing a name once or twice.  4 or more, which there are, I think should be investigated. The last 50 or so names were small donations.  2 were for only 1 dollar.  These were probably just to mask the people receiving the “payoff”.  Dollar for dollar, the democrat party received more money than the republicans by a substantial amount.   Remember that this is a partial list  from less than half of the companies I listed and researched.  There are a lot more suppliers out there.

  1. Brown, Sherrod (D-OH)
  2. Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
  3. Cornyn, John (R-TX)
  4. Enzi, Mike (R-WY)
  5. Isakson, Johnny (R-GA)
  6. Jones, Doug (D-AL)
  7. Lankford, James (R-OK)
  8. Portman, Rob (R-OH)
  9. Rubio, Marco (R-FL)
  10. Sinema, Kyrsten (D-AZ)
  11. Tillis, Thom (R-NC)
  12. Warner, Mark (D-VA)
  13. Young, Todd (R-IN)
  14. Blunt, Roy (R-MO)
  15. Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
  16. Collins, Susan M (R-ME)
  17. Markey, Ed (D-MA)
  18. Portman, Rob (R-OH)
  19. Tillis, Thom (R-NC)
  20. Braun, Mike (R-IN)
  21. Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
  22. Collins, Susan M (R-ME)
  23. Cornyn, John (R-TX)
  24. Daines, Steven (R-MT)
  25. Ernst, Joni (R-IA)
  26. Gardner, Cory (R-CO)
  27. Graham, Lindsey (R-SC)
  28. Grassley, Chuck (R-IA)
  29. Kennedy, Joe III (D-MA)
  30. McConnell, Mitch (R-KY)
  31. McSally, Martha (R-AZ)
  32. Brady, Kevin (R-TX)
  33. Brownley, Julia (D-CA)
  34. Bucshon, Larry (R-IN)
  35. Burgess, Michael (R-TX)
  36. Butterfield, G K (D-NC)
  37. Cardenas, Tony (D-CA)
  38. Cheney, Liz (R-WY)
  39. Correa, Lou (D-CA)
  40. Curtis, John (R-UT)
  41. DeGette, Diana (D-CO)
  42. DelBene, Suzan (D-WA)
  43. Escobar, Veronica (D-TX)
  44. Eshoo, Anna (D-CA)
  45. Ferguson, Drew (R-GA)
  46. Gottheimer, Josh (D-NJ)
  47. Guthrie, Brett (R-KY)
  48. Houlahan, Chrissy (D-PA)
  49. Hoyer, Steny H (D-MD)
  50. Krishnamoorthi, Raja (D-IL)
  51. Mast, Brian (R-FL)
  52. McAdams, Ben (D-UT)
  53. McCarthy, Kevin (R-CA)
  54. Neal, Richard E (D-MA)
  55. Neguse, Joseph (D-CO)
  56. Pallone, Frank Jr (D-NJ)
  57. Peters, Scott (D-CA)
  58. Price, David (D-NC)
  59. Schneider, Brad (D-IL)
  60. Smith, Adrian (R-NE)
  61. Stefanik, Elise (R-NY)
  62. Walden, Greg (R-OR)
  63. Walorski, Jackie (R-IN)
  64. Blumenthal, Richard (D-CT)
  65. Booker, Cory (D-NJ)
  66. Burr, Richard (R-NC)
  67. Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
  68. Cornyn, John (R-TX)
  69. Durbin, Dick (D-IL)
  70. Fischer, Deb (R-NE)
  71. Gardner, Cory (R-CO)
  72. Grassley, Chuck (R-IA)
  73. Hassan, Maggie (D-NH)
  74. McConnell, Mitch (R-KY)
  75. McSally, Martha (R-AZ)
  76. Murray, Patty (D-WA)
  77. Perdue, David (R-GA)
  78. Romney, Mitt (R-UT)
  79. Sasse, Ben (R-NE)
  80. Schumer, Charles E (D-NY)
  81. Scott, Rick (R-FL)
  82. Scott, Tim (R-SC)
  83. Shaheen, Jeanne (D-NH)
  84. Sinema, Kyrsten (D-AZ)
  85. Tillis, Thom (R-NC)
  86. Toomey, Pat (R-PA)
  87. Wyden, Ron (D-OR)
  88. Young, Todd (R-IN)
  89. Perdue, David (R-GA)
  90. Peters, Gary (D-MI)
  91. Shaheen, Jeanne (D-NH)
  92. Tillis, Thom (R-NC)
  93. Toomey, Pat (R-PA)
  94. Warner, Mark (D-VA)
  95. Warren, Elizabeth(D-MAS1)
  96. McConnell, Mitch(R-KYS1)
  97. Maloney, Sean Patric(D-NY18)
  98. Cassidy, Bill (R-LAS1)
  99. Pallone, Frank J (D-NJ06)
  100. Williamson, Marianne (D-PRES)
  101. Tillis, Thom (R-NCS1)
  102. Eshoo, Anna (D-CA18)
  103. Rubio, Marco (R-FLS2)
  104. Peters, Scott (D-CA52)
  105. Pascrell, Bill J (D-NJ09)
  106. Matsui, Doris (D-CA06)
  107. Holding, George (R-NC02)
  108. Harris, Kamala(D-CAS1)
  109. Klobuchar, Amy(D-MNS2)
  110. O’Rourke, Beto(D-PRES)
  111. Malinowski, Tom (D-NJ07)
  112. Schiff, Adam(D-CA28)
  113. Shaheen, Jeanne (D-NHS2)
  114. Keating, Bill(D-MA09)
  115. Evans, Dwight (D-PA03)
  116. Dingell, Debbie(D-MI12)
  117. McGrath, Amy (D-KYS1)
  118. Booker, Cory (D-NJS2)
  119. Plame, Valerie(D-NM03)
  120. Castro, Julian(D-PRES)
  121. Gabbard, Tulsi(D-HI02)
  122. Davids, Sharice(D-KS03)
  123. Gandhi, Pritesh (D-TX10)
  124. Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria (D-NY14)
  125. Sherrill, Mikie (D-NJ11)
  126. Cornyn, John (R-TXS1)
  127. Demaio, Carl (R-CA50)
  128. Kelly, Mark(D-AZS1)
  129. Ross, Deborah(D-NC02)
  130. Pelosi, Nancy(D-CA12)
  131. Nunes, Devin (R-CA22)
  132. James, John(R-MIS1)
  133. Gideon, Sara(D-MES2)
  134. Morelle, Joseph D(D-NY25)
  135. Harrison, Jaime (D-SCS2)
  136. Cobb, Tedra (D-NY21)
  137. Stefanik, Elise(R-NY21)
  138. Omar, Ilhan(D-MN05)
  139. Long, Carolyn(D-WA03)
  140. Jones, Mondaire(D-NY17)
  141. Boroughs, Adair (D-SC02)
  142. Hill, Katie(D-CA25)
  143. Casey, Bob(D-PAS2)
  144. Gillibrand, Kirsten(D-NYS1)
  145. Tlaib, Rashida (D-MI13)
  146. Soto, Darren (D-FL09)
  147. Inslee, Jay(D-PRES)
  148. Jones, Doug (D-ALS1)
  149. Porter, Katie (D-CA45)
  150. Rosen, Jacky(D-NVS1)
  151. Buttar, Shahid(D-CA12)
  152. Bowman, Jamaal(D-NY16)
  153. Hickenlooper, John (D-COS2)
  154. Jones, Gina (D-TX23)
  155. Bourdeaux, Carolyn (D-GA07)
  156. Van Drew, Jeff(R-NJ02)
  157. Jayapal, Pramila(D-WA07)
  158. Warner, Mark(D-VAS2)
  159. Lujan, Ben Ray(D-NM03)
  160. Ryan, Tim (D-OH13)
  161. Sweet, Betsy (D-MES2)
  162. Wilkes, Mckayla (D-MD05)
  163. McBath, Lucy (D-GA06)
  164. Levin, Mike (D-CA49)
  165. Kennedy, Joe III(D-MA04)
  166. Murphy, Christopher S (D-CTS1)
  167. Cisneros, Jessica(D-TX28)
  168. Gravel, Mike (D-PRES)
  169. Sites, Jeffrey(D-OH04)
  170. Bollier, Barbara (D-KSS1)
  171. Ehr, Phil(D-FL01)
  172. Walsh, John(D-COS2)
  173. Harper, Morgan(D-OH03)
  174. McCarthy, Kevin (R-CA23)
  175. Bennet, Michael(D-COS1)
  176. Baer, Dan(D-COS2)
  177. Bullock, Steve(D-MTS2)
  178. Peters, Gary (D-MIS1)
  179. Masto, Catherine Cortez (D-NVS2)
  180. Moulton, Seth(D-MA06)
  181. Houlahan, Chrissy(D-PA06)
  182. Pressley, Ayanna (D-MA07)
  183. Islam, Nabilah (D-GA07)
  184. Van Duyne, Beth (R-TX24)
  185. Mace, Nancy(R-SC01)
  186. Cox, TJ (D-CA21)
  187. Parson, Rebecca(D-WA06)
  188. Arballo, Phil(D-CA22)
  189. Freshour, Shannon (D-OH04)
  190. Rouda, Harley(D-CA48)
  191. Aguilar, Pete(D-CA31)
  192. Smith, Tina (D-MNS1)
  193. Slotkin, Elissa (D-MI08)
  194. Zornio, Trish(D-COS2)
  195. Cunningham, Cal (D-NCS1)
  196. Lieberman, Matthew(D-GAS2)
  197. Ramirez, Cristina Tzintzun (D-TXS1)
  198. Bishop, Dan(R-NC09)
  199. Kahele, Kai(D-HI02)
  200. McGovern, James P (D-MA02)
  201. Merkley, Jeff(D-ORS1)
  202. Ernst, Joni (R-IAS2)
  203. Gardner, Cory (R-COS2)

 

That’s quite a list.  I’m not sure what to think.   I had to stop looking. But don’t let that stop you from having a look..  You can start at OpenSecrets.com.

Lets take a look at the suppliers.

The following comes from ThomasNet.com Take notice that  they mention a shortage of Covid-19 test kits.   They also mention how “regulations have opened up”.

Currently, there is still a shortage of COVID-19 test kits in the United States. Although originally only the CDC’s test kits were approved for use, more and more resources have become available as regulations have opened up due to the need for more testing.

  • The CDC, despite initially faulty reagents making its first test kits unreliable, is now offering accurate RT-PCR Diagnostic Panels and positive and human specimen controls. These kits should be used only in CLIA certified labs and are meant to be processed with the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast DX Real-Time PCR Instrument with SDS 1.4 software, which is specialized equipment that requires specific training. As of March 14th, public health laboratories using the CDC’s assay to test for the virus aren’t required to get CDC confirmation of their samples.
  • State, academic, and independent labs have been developing kits for their own testing as the FDA has loosened regulations. These labs must still validate their results according to FDA regulations and submit them for emergency use authorization within 15 days.
  • Commercial companies have been increasingly putting coronavirus kits out into the market in recent weeks as regulations have loosened. While some are still very specialized and require specific instrumentation, easier and more automated tests are being developed. Test kits that work in a half hour by simply changing the color of a piece of paper are currently in the concept stage.

Additional shortages in test-related supplies like swabs, virus control samples, and RT-PCR instruments have limited the amount of testing laboratories are capable of. Some labs are awaiting government approval as well, and there is no standard machinery for every test, which means some labs don’t have the equipment for some of the tests available. However, as the FDA has issued emergency approval for more and more tests, the greater variety is allowing more laboratories to start testing with their own equipment, and without the need for special training. Because the need has been so great, the FDA has started allowing companies to distribute tests without official review as of March 16, as long as the manufacturers submit validation and data within 15 days.

Some private companies including Lab Corp and Quest Diagnostics have started offering testing services for the virus already, in addition to state and hospital labs. Many labs are still getting the testing up and running, however, so they aren’t able to test at full capacity yet. 

The following is some basic data on the suppliers and developers.

  1. Thermo Fisher Scientific  The company currently sells emergency use and research use test kits. 
  2. LabCorp Currently offers a test for COVID-19 as well as hundreds of other tests.
  3. Cepheid  Working on a test kit for coronavirus and hopes to release it in the second quarter of this year. 
  4. Hologic  The company, whose test was recently approved and which runs on its Panther Fusion system, is headquartered in Marlborough, MA.
  5. Danaher Test kits are not yet FDA approved, but they can be used by laboratories with CLIA certifications. Company owns  Cepheid, Beckman Coulter, Radiometer, Leica Biosystems, and HemoCue.
  6. Roche Diagnostics  Received emergency approval from the CDC for its coronavirus kits, which use automated equipment that already exists in dozens of laboratories across the U.S. Its kits are now for sale. 
  7. bioMérieux Planning to release 3 tests. One is to be submitted for FDA approval at the end of March, and two others, to be finished by Q2 and Q3, will be automated versions, one of which will also test for 21 other types of viruses. 
  8. Integrated DNA Technologies Currently sells both research only and emergency use coronavirus tests. 
  9. Abbott Laboratories Test approved by the FDA March 18th and has immediately started shipping them out. Tests are run on m2000TM RealTime Systems, which exist in over 175 laboratories and hospitals nationwide. 
  10. Quidel Tests run on existing molecular testing machinery and currently are available for sale.
  11. Qiagen Selling tests to detect COVID-19, ramping up production in its factories to keep up with the demand.
  12. Quest Diagnostics,  offers tests.
  13. Grifols  Offers diagnostics for infectious diseases.
  14.  GenMark Diagnostics  Developed research-only test kits for coronavirus, and is currently applying to the FDA to allow their tests for emergency uses. 
  15. Co-Diagnostics Offering its coronavirus test kits through the CDC’s IRR. 
  16.  Sherlock Biosciences, Developing a paper test that will change color once samples of CRISPR processed DNA from swabs have been applied. They are hoping to submit the test for FDA approval.. 
  17. Philips Sells medical supplies.

Suppliers Developing COVID-19 Test Kits

 

Company

U.S. Headquarters

Test Kit Status

Annual Revenue

1

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Waltham, MA

For sale

250+*

2

LabCorp

Burlington, NC

For sale (performs the testing itself)

250+

3

Cepheid

Sunnyvale, CA

Release in the second quarter of 2020

250+

4

Hologic

Marlborough, MA

For sale

250+

5

Danaher

Washington, D.C.

For sale

250+

6

Roche Diagnostics

Indianapolis, IN

For sale

250+

7

bioMérieux

Durham, NC

End of first quarter of 2020 (research use only); unknown (emergency use authorization)

250+*

8

Integrated DNA Technologies

Coralville, IA

For sale

100-249.9

9

Abbott Laboratories

Abbott Park, IL

For sale

100-249.9

10

Quidel

San Diego, CA

For sale

100-249.9

11

GenMark Diagnostics

Carlsbad, CA

 For sale (Research use only); under FDA review (emergency use authorization)

50-99.9**

12

Co-Diagnostics, Inc.

Salt Lake City, UT

For sale through the CDC’s IRR website

25-49.9**

13

Qiagen

Minneapolis, MN

For sale

5-9.9

14

Sherlock Biosciences

Cambridge, MA

In development

The following comes from kaloramainformation.com and ThomasNet.com.
Top Suppliers of General Medical Testing Kit

Data from 2018

 

Company

U.S. Headquarters

Annual Revenue

Year Founded

1

Roche Diagnostics

Indianapolis, IN

63.5

1998

2

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Waltham, MA

25

1956

3

Philips

Cambridge, MA

20

1891

4

Danaher Corporation (owns Beckman Coulter and Cepheid)

Washington, D.C.

15.5

1919

5

Siemens Healthineers

Malvern, PA

15.2

2015

6

Becton Dickinson

Franklin Lakes, NJ

12.1

1897

7

LabCorp. Laboratory Corporation of America

Burlington, NC

10.3

1978

8

Quest Diagnostics

Secaucus, NJ

7.4

1967

9

Grifols

Los Angeles, CA

4.8

1987

10

Hologic

Marlborough, MA

3

1986

 The following comes from kaloramainformation.com

These are manufactures of medical test kits in general.

IVD Market Top 25 Companies

  •  Alere Inc.
  •  Arkray
  •  Beckman Coulter / Danaher
  •  Becton Dickinson
  •  Bio-Rad Laboratories
  •  bioMérieux
  •  Cepheid / Danaher
  •  Danaher Corp. (including Radiometer A/S)
  •  Grifols
  •  Hologic
  •  Illumina
  •  Instrumentation Laboratory / Werfen
  •  LabCorp, Laboratory Corporation of America
  •  Luminex
  •  Ortho Clinical Diagnostics
  •  PerkinElmer
  •  Qiagen N.V.
  •  Quest Diagnostics
  •  Quidel
  •  Roche Diagnostics (including Ventana Medical Systems)
  •  Philips
  •  Siemens Healthineers
  •  Sysmex Corporation
  •  Thermo Fisher

For more test kits click here.

 

I know that I’ve mentioned on several occasions that test kits only equal more positive test results and more covid-19 related deaths.  I discussed why in my post How Fake News MSM and the democrats lied to you about covid-19 testing.  

I’m not going to repeat what I already wrote but I would advise you to go back and review it if you have any problems putting it all together.

I pointed out how what the democrats and the Fake NewsMSM had been reporting the wrong data.  Their counts on people infected with covid-19 and covid-19 causes of death were high.  Complete lies.  They are still doing it today.  Fake news CBS News reported the following,

The coronavirus death toll surpassed 10,000 in the United States on Monday, according to Johns Hopkins University. There are more than 347,000 confirmed cases across the country.

CBS is not  the only Fake News organization reporting these numbers. It’s the same for just about all the Fake News Organizations. To read more of this garbage click here.

The  actual number of deaths are provided in the image.

aprilFor source click CDC.

 

Lets take a look at the actual number of infections.

cases reported

Remember that this report of cases includes presumptive positive test.  These are not confirmed tests.  Explained in the next graphic.

pres

 

At this point we can see the obvious.  The fake news CBS is lying.  Deaths surpassing 10,000 if far more than what the CDC reports at 1,880.  They reported 347,000 confirmed tests. CDC reports 304,926 of both confirmed and unconfirmed.  Already we see Fake news of lying.  If they did their actual job and looked for the real confirmed cases they would come up with the following.

158,700 actual confirmed positive cases. CBS more than doubled the confirmed positive. That’s out of the 1,019,261 total tested.  That’s about 15%  confirmed positive.  This tells  us that 85% of the people being tested come up negative.(Calculated with available data.  Even if data was fully updated the end results, percent ratio will be around the same.)

results

Personally I question the results from commercial labs , but whatever.  We work with what we have.

Given the information available we can calculate what percent of covid-19 related deaths out of the amount of people tested.  1,889/1,019,261=0.0018533035=.18533035 %.  That’s nothing compared to influenza at 8.2 % mortality rate which is above the epidemic rate at 7.2%

Source for this info click here.

Now look at the illness onset.  Does it look like things are getting worse.

 

onset

To view this source click here.

You will notice in the chart above that there is a decline in illness onset. You should also be seeing a decline in new covid-19 cases as well as covid-19 deaths.  A headline on Bloomberg.com  from April 5, 2020 for example .

New York Reports First Decline in Daily Coronavirus Deaths

Why do you think that is?  It’s because there is a shortage of test kits.  The supply of test kits should start replenishiong. As the inventory grows, more cases will appear.

You should also notice that all the new companies with the new “home tests” are being blocked.    They might get approved in 2 weeks or a month from now  but until then they are going to be blocked.  Some companies get to bypass regulations because of the demand but that does not include the makers of home tests.

 No COVID-19 testing at home yet but quicker options coming

WASHINGTON (AP) — Home testing for the new coronavirus may sound like a good idea, but U.S. regulators say it’s still too risky.

They’ve stopped companies that quickly launched home-testing kits until they can show their products can accurately detect the virus.

For now, the only way Americans can get tested is at hospitals, clinics or drive-thru sites, with a doctor’s order.

After a botched rollout, testing in the U.S. has ramped up thanks to high-volume testing  machines and new rapid tests. Last week, federal officials said total tests -topped 1.4 million, and labs are processing nearly 100,000 tests daily. That’s the threshold many experts say is needed to track the virus.

Coronavirus screening: Calif. COVID-19 task force lead hopes to have enough tests for general public by next month.

The testing space has been a challenging one for us. I own that and I have a responsibility as your governor to do better and to do more testing in the state of California,” said Governor Gavin Newsom.

COVID-19 testing backlog decreased, more testing on the way, Gov. Newsom announces.

Gov. Newsom confirmed over 126,000 people have been tested for COVID-19 and 13,000 of those are still awaiting results. Staggering numbers that led to a state partnership with two California universities and a task force to increase the volume of tests.”Partnership with UC Davis and UC San Diego to create a minimum of 5 to 7 hubs where we will work with different vendors,” said Gov. Newsom.Leading the COVID-19 test task force is Dr. Charity Dean, Assistance director of California’s Public Health Department and Paul Markovich, president and CEO of Blue Shield of California.

East Bay company to have hand-held COVID-19 testing devices ready by next month

Markovich wants to make sure that anyone in need of a test can get one.”We’ve set a goal to get to 10,000 per day in the next two weeks to 25,000 per day by the end of this month. By the end of the summer in August getting to the capacity of 50,000 a day,” said Markovich.An increase of COVID-19 testing will hopefully mean a decrease in deaths. At least 300 people have died of COVID-19 in California.When we asked Markovich for a timeline of when his team plans to have available tests for the general public to get tested he said, “Well if we hit our targets, I would say within a month we should be able to do that. Ideally we want to be in a position to do that as we start relaxing the stay at home measures.”Governor Gavin Newsom also announced that more test sites are set to open. Abbott Laboratories committed to opening 75 testing sites in California. The state also announced the website, covid19supplies.ca.gov, supported by Salesforce.During this supply shortage, the website will allow people and manufacturers to offer resources.

More examples of the “shortages”

sahgort

 

Here is what insider Dr Fauci has to say about the “deaths to come”. The following is from time.com.  Generally I don’t like to “copy pasta” a complete article but in this case it is necessary source to make my point.

‘We Are Struggling to Get It Under Control’ Dr. Anthony Fauci Says About the U.S. COVID-19 Outbreak

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the top American infectious disease specialist,warned Sunday that the U.S. is “struggling” to curb the outbreak of COVID-19, but said that there are signs that mitigation efforts are working.                                                                                                        In an appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation, Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a leading member of President Trump’s coronavirus task force, explained that while the country’s efforts are having an impact, he could not say “we have it under control.” “That would be a false statement. We are struggling to get it under control,” Fauci said. Fauci warned that the rate of new cases will likely get worse before it gets better. While the immediate goal is to reduce the number of new cases, the effects of mitigation efforts would not be visible for “days, if not weeks.” He warned that there is a “bad week” ahead, although the rate of new coronavirus cases may “flatten” by within the week, or somewhat later“As the cases go down, then you get less hospitalizations, less intensive care and less death,” said Fauci. “So even though you’re getting a — really improvement in that the number of new cases are starting to flatten, the death will lag by, you know, one or two weeks or more. So we need to be prepared that even though it’s clear that mitigation is working, we’re still going to see that tail-off of deaths.”                                                                                                                                               Fauci’s comments came the same morning as New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced that the number of deaths has been dropping for the first time in the state, and that there were fewer deaths on Saturday than on Friday. He said that it could be a “blip” in the data— or the “beginning of a shift.”

This is from Fake News CNN

US coronavirus fight enters crucial weeks as the number of cases tops 330,000

(CNN)The next two weeks will be crucial in the United States’ fight against the coronavirus, warn health officials, who are urging Americans to continue practicing social-distancing measures.

Dr Fauci is being made out as some kind of hero by the Fake News MSM and democrats.  When we see this sort of “over the top” praise coming from the Fake News or democrats we should always question the person they are building. With that being said, here is what they used to think about Dr Fauci during the AIDS epidemic.

 

Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 04:16:51 -0400
From:DaveACTUP+@aol.com
Subject: ACT UP zaps Tony Fauci

I was one of the organizers of the action in SF against Fauci. Here is the
text of the flyer that we distributed to the diners at the Project Inform
dinner.

Hope it helps to clarify our position. Take care. ACT UP!

************************************************

"You are responsible for all government funded AIDS treatment research. In
the name of right, you make decisions that cost the lives of others. I call
the decisions you are making acts of murder."
Larry Kramer
"An Open Letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci"
San Francisco Examiner, June 26, 1988

Anthony Fauci, you are a murderer and should not be the guest of honor at any
event that reflects on the past decade of the AIDS crisis. Your refusal to
hear the screams of AIDS activists early in the crisis resulted in the deaths
of thousands of Queers. Your present inaction is causing today's increase in
HIV infection outside of the Queer community.  We are outraged that Project
Inform, an organization that supposedly works on behalf of the infected
community, would insult us by bringing you to our city. You can't hide the
fact that you are nothing but a despicable Reagan-era holdover and drug
company mouthpiece.

With 270,000 dead from AIDS and millions more infected with HIV, you should
not be honored at a dinner. You should be put before a firing squad.

Clinical trials: government sanctioned mass murder of PWAs

Anthony Fauci, you are a murderer because you oversee government sponsored
clinical trials that test and retest combinations of immunosuppressive, toxic
therapies that kill people with HIV. The majority of U.S. clinical trials
involve worthless antivirals like AZT combined with some other drug
(generally another toxic antiviral). What these tests have proven is that you
are able to piss away billions of dollars testing dangerous compounds that DO
NOTHING to improve the quality of life, to stop opportunistic infections or
to extend survival for people with HIV. AZT, 3TC, ddI, ddC, d4T and the
current crop of protease inhibitors are nothing but poison. Ten years of the
plague has shown us that trying to kill the virus kills people with AIDS, and
you, Dr. Fauci, know it.

How long will it take you to start focusing on the immune system, how to
boost it and how to prevent the opportunistic infections that are killing
people with AIDS? Even you admit that "the immune response against HIV is
extremely powerful and is clearly more effective than any of the therapeutic
approaches currently available in controlling virus replication." Still , you
give your blessing to clinical trials of highly profitable toxins that
destroy PWAs' already compromised immune systems.

CD4s and viral load: a marketing exec's wet dream

Anthony Fauci, you are a liar because you have known for years that CD4
counts are a travesty of a surrogate marker that, through drug company
coercion, have been elevated to the status of "a standard." Now that everyone
else knows it too, you and your corporate drug company cronies are urging
researchers to foist another useless marker, peripheral blood viral load
counts, on our frightened, desperate community. Peripheral blood viral load
fluctuates in blood circulation and offers virtually no indication of the
health or disease progression in HIV+ people. According to a recent article
in the April 1995 issue of Lancet concerning viral replication, "the
principle that virus suppression will produce a major clinical benefit must
remain an article of faith." Information like that isn't stopping doctors of
death like Marcus Conant from insisting that "patients should be treated
earlier with combination therapy, and we should be using markers such as PCR
and branched DNA to measure viral load as surrogate markers in clinical
trials."

Your scheme isn't too difficult to figure out; promote another invalid
surrogate marker that has no relation to health or life expectancy of PWAs;
develop a test that costs $200-$300 to measure this invalid marker; encourage
the creation of more deadly drugs that effect this invalid marker; and then
compare the pathetic results you get from these deadly drugs to the more
pathetic results you got from AZT and other nukes. In the eyes of the
government everybody wins. Companies that sell drugs and market tests get
rich and PWAs who sacrifice their bodies in your trials of death are
eliminated from the face of the earth.

The fact that your clinical trials aren't meant to save our lives is no
secret. A December 1994 BETA article "A Remarkable Combination: AZT plus 3TC"
reports that the Phase II/III studies of these drugs were "designed to
evaluate the effect of the combination on laboratory markers of HIV disease
progression, such as viral load and CD4 counts, not critical endpoints, such
as opportunistic infections and survival."

AIDS activists from ACT UP San Francisco and DNCB Now! have been screaming
for over a year that HIV+ people need to activate their cell mediated
immunity and raise their CD8 counts. These activists were invited to the NIH
to present a forum and share their knowledge and experience with researchers.
Finally some researchers are coming around and hearing our voices. Doctors
like Susan Buchbinder who in the August 1994 issue of AIDS stated that
"elevated levels of CD8 cells in healthy long-term HIV+ individuals suggest
that these cells play an important role in delaying disease progression."

Because of your 1995 Annual Review of Immunology article we know that you
know this, Dr. Fauci, but still you prattle on about those CD4s that tell us
nothing at all.

Selling out: from "Murderer" to "Tony"

One thing that 10 years of the plague has taught us is how easily people and
organizations can be bought off. You are one of those people, Dr. Fauci.
Project Inform is one of those organizations. During this time of crisis you
are complacent; part of a government bureaucracy that values thriving
pharmaceutical  company entrepreneurism over the health of people with HIV.

You are a pill-pushing pimp that cooperates with drug companies in forcing
dangerous concoctions down the throats of a desperate community that is
brainwashed into believing that taking a pill, any pill, will help them. AIDS
drugs are not sold to help people, they are sold to make a profit. The
situation is so out of control that drug companies now create and sell drugs
like Marinol, a synthetic derivative of the natural compound marijuana.

The conflict of interest, so apparent between you and the pharmaceutical
corporations, has now been embraced by those in the AIDS community who claim
that they are leaders. In their present state, organizations like Project
Inform, San Francisco AIDS Foundation, and ACT UP Golden Gate are all so
embroiled in conflict of interest that they must be viewed as enemies by
PWAs. Project Inform is still pushing AZT. San Francisco AIDS Foundation's
BETA reads like a promo piece for Glaxo. And many of today's so-called AIDS
activists are nothing more than public relations representatives whose job it
is to create a demand for the latest overpriced cure du jour. In the
meantime, grassroots efforts like the AIDS Cure Act are assailed by these
sellout AIDS organizations that have no desire to ever see a cure.

Ten years of hope? Fuck that. Try a decade of death and greed. Go back to
Washington you bastard.

source

That’s not something the democrats or MSM is going to go out on a limb to show you.  Sure it’s from 1995, but old habits can be hard to break.

Closing Rant

Lets go back to Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2,996 Americans were killed.  Another 25,ooo injured.  America was under attack.  We didn’t know  if more attacks going to happen.  For all we knew our neighbor could have been a terrorist.  There wasn’t any place to hide.  Every single Americans life was in danger.  All the result that came from an enemy that a lot of Americans didn’t know they had.  A unseen enemy that killed more Americans on US soil in modern history.  Was there a stay at home order then? Did we shut down the country?  How about when the swine flu hit America? What about Pearl Harbor when it was attacked by Japan killing 2,403 Americans with another 1,143 injured(Japan didn’t want to attack because they knew every American owned a gun)?

  “Much of the Pacific fleet was rendered useless: Five of eight battleships, three destroyers, and seven other ships were sunk or severely damaged, and more than 200 aircraft were destroyed”.   

Was this enough to make people stay at home and shut down the country?  The answer is no in all cases.  Think about it.  Almost 3,000 people were killed.  25,000 iunjured plus a strike on the Pentagon,  the headquarters building of the United States Department of Defense,  wasn’t enough to shut the country down.  Why?  Because shutting down the country would cause more damage that the current danger they were facing.  This was something everyone could agree on.

  So what changed?  Why did the democrats and the MSM lie to every American and create a situation where Trump had to take such extreme actions.   By creating fear and panic, the democrats and MSM were able create a situation that limited Trump’s options.  The democrats wanted and still are trying to destroy President Trump and America.  What changed is that we have the democrats conspiring with the MSM, working to overthrow our government.  4 years of nonstop attacks on a sitting US President. 

That’s not “oversite.” There is no just cause to investigate the President.   Yet the democrats and MSM continue to work against the will of the people.  Against our president.  With total disregard for the damage they have inflicted on our country.   That’s an attack on our whole way of life.  Attacking a US President is the same as attacking every American.  The democrats and the MSM  are guilty of Treason and Espionage and so much more. 

By now people should be able to see what the democrats are up to.  They are fully exploiting the covid-19 situation.  I personally believe the democrats and the MSM are responsible for the existence  of the covid-19 pandemic.   So I’m renaming  covid-19 since it’s 2020.  Covid-19 is now DNCLIE-20 or MSMFN-20

Besides the economy, I believe we have a danger far worse then the pandemic will ever be.  That’s if the democrats are able to get control of the White House.  How?  by doing what I’ve been warning about for the last 4 years.  It’s how they won California.  If you have been paying attention you will see the democrats are pushing the shut down for a longer period of time.  They are also pushing early voting by mail or voting by mail in general.  This is the main cheat the democrats use to win elections. They’re trying to convince people that voting by mail is more secure.  Lie and scare them into submission.

It’s extremely easy to vote by mail.  I’ll give you an example.  I vote by mail.  I registered and voted without ever providing 1 piece of evidence.  For the primaries in California, I just wrote my info down and mailed it in.  I did the same in 2016.  Things went a little different that year.  They asked for proof of who I was.  I ignored them but still got a ballot.  

The democrats  are using the MSM, Hollywood, Academia, Social Media, everybody and everything in their control to continue to lie to America and create more panic.  I can hear it now, “Stay home or covid-19, the planet killer will get you”,  “hide in your homes”, “We want you to feel safe when you vote”.  Deceiving Americans as they manipulate the ballots, spread lies about Trump, steal from the government and  do their best to crash the economy.  Then if successful, blame Trump for the damage.  The democrats are all in.  Using covid-19 as a political tool is not below the democrats.  If you believe in freedom, justice, equality and liberty then there is no way you can allow any democrat to gain complete control of the usa. 

Things to think about

Forget about my personal comments and look at the facts I presented today.  Mainly look at the amount of deaths are being reported, actual confirmed cases and real mortality rate.  Look at all the politicians that have recieved donations from the test kit manufactures.  Look at the push to buy test kits.  Look at behind  pushing a longer shut down. Do you believe the test are a waste of time?  Are we already infected with a type of coronavirus and the wuhan virus has nothing to do with the strains discovered here in the USA? Do you believe that democrats are conspiring with the MSM?  Do you think this shut down creating a more problems then we would have if we just let covid-19 run it;s course? Do you believe that the democrats want to force mail in voting so they can cheat?  Do you believe that the democrats are exploiting the pandemic?  Do you believe Dr. Fauci is an insider working with the democrats?  Do you believe the democrats and the MSM are causing people th panic?  Do you believe that President Trump is getting all the relevent information he needs?  Do you think that his advisors, staff, etc are doing a good job at keeping him informed?  Do you believe the pandemic is a distraction? How about a  smokescreen created by the democrats with help from foreign governments? Do you blame China for the pandemic or does it come from US Soil?  Do you feel this may be a way to destroy the economy worldwide?  One thing that should be perfectly clear is is that shut down needs to end and justice needs to be served.

Please tell me your thoughts

Respectfully

Deplorablre Patriot

“Testing is a waste of time and money”

Disclaimer-  The owner of Fellowship of the Minds(FOTM), Dr Eowyn allows myself along with the rest of the editors/authors here at FOTM the freedom to post what we choose. My views and opinions expressed here at FOTM are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Dr Eowyn , Fellowship of the Minds or any other editor/author at Fellowship of the Minds.. Any content I provide is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual or anyone or anything.  Everything that I post is my responsibility alone.  Deplorable Patriot

Additional sources

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/testing.html
https://www.internationalreagentresource.org
/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/testing-in-us.html
https://business.financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/labcorp-makes-coronavirus-test-available-for-ordering-in-u-s
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/testing.html
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/03/06/coronavirus-test-kit-how-can-get-tested-us-covid-19-virus/4973697002/
https://www.internationalreagentresource.org/
https://www.propublica.org/article/cdc-coronavirus-covid-19-test
https://www.wsj.com/articles/hospitals-companies-race-to-develop-tests-to-spot-coronavirus-linked-illness-11583245423
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/officials-say-coronavirus-tests-are-here-where-are-they-n114
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-care/many-private-labs-want-do-coronavirus-tests-they-re-facing-n1156006
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-coronavirus-testing-problems-timeline-2020-3#hahn-said-the-government-plans-to-ship-4-million-additional-tests-by-the-end-of-next-week-18
https://www.labcorp.com/information-labcorp-about-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/03/11/814189027/no-guarantee-youll-get-tested-for-covid-19-even-if-your-doctor-requests-it
https://www.wired.com/story/fda-approves-the-first-commercial-coronavirus-tests-in-the-us/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2020/03/18/us-approves-abbott-labs-coronavirus-test-for-hospital-use/#2a78a41a5111
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/technology/story/2020-03-19/biotech-firms-in-san-diego-get-emergency-approval-to-deliver-coronavrus-tests
https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/news/policy-and-regulation/few-groups-have-developed-covid-19-diagnostics-will
https://www.biocentury.com/article/304556/covid-19-could-give-crispr-diagnostics-their-first-proof-of-principle
https://www.npr.org/2020/03/13/815522836/u-s-coronavirus-testing-gets-a-breakthrough
https://www.wired.com/story/fda-approves-the-first-commercial-coronavirus-tests-in-the-us/
https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/roche-begins-shipping-400-000-coronavirus-test-kits-per-week-u-s
https://www.wired.com/story/everything-you-need-to-know-about-coronavirus-testing/
https://www.modernhealthcare.com/technology/labs-face-challenges-creating-diagnosis-testing-covid-19
Coronavirus Suppliers and Manufacturers in the USA

 

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

Britain discovers test kits contaminated with covid-19

Who would think that a batch of covid-19 test kits would turn up contaminated with covid-19? Well, it’s happened. Great Britian  is the first to report contaminated test kits.  The story goes as follows.

Britain’s attempts to step up its testing for the novel coronavirus have suffered a setback after some key parts of the testing kits that were due to be imported were found to have been contaminated with the coronavirus. The Daily Telegraph reported that British labs have been told to expect a delay in the delivery some of the components of the kits after traces of the virus were detected on them. The British government has been criticized for its relatively low testing rates, which are way behind other wealthy nations like Germany, the United States, and South Korea. The government brought in foreign private firms to help produce thousands of kits, but it’s one of those suppliers—the Luxembourg-based firm Eurofins—that has told British labs that some of the components have been contaminated.

To read more of this source click here

I wanted to remind people that when you get tested for covid-19, a swab is used to collect samples.  Besides being used to test for covid-19, these samples can be used to log your DNA  in a database.

Some DNA collecting uses a swab to collect samples  from the cheek, inside the mouth.

Covid-19 testing uses a swab to collect samples  from the upper nasal passage .   I’ve also seen where they  collect a second sample by using  a swab to collect samples from the cheek, inside the mouth.   The second sample is collected exactly like they collect samples for DNA test.

Why the second sample?

CDC provides the test kits for public health laboratories (PHLs) to perform real-time RT-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (the virus that causes COVID-19) in respiratory specimens. CDC received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on February 4, 2020 for use of this rRT-PCR test to detect the virus in upper and lower respiratory specimens.

More on this sourced  click here

I’m not saying your DNA is being collected and logged.  I’m saying it is a possibility. 

If you think about it. What would be a better opportunity to collect DNA from people? Take that information and crosscheck it against a database of unsolved crimes,  missing persons or fugitives from justice that have changed their identities.  Maybe just keep it in a database for future use.

Covid-19 pandemic and testing opens the opportunity for conspiracies to thrive.  I can think of many.  One being DNA collecting, like I just described.  Another could be that they are using the nasal passage swab to insert a nano-microchip,  smart dust, nano-bot or self sustaining micro fibers.  Any one of these could be used for mind control. To take it a step further I would ask the question “If covid-19 is so contagious, why do they need 2 samples and why do they need a sample that’s buried deep in the back of your nasal passage?  Wouldn’t a saliva sample be sufficient?

Indeed, any of these is entirely possible.  A person has to be responsible when presenting these ideas.  Until factual evidence is provided a person should remember that these conspiracy theories are only theories.    Not proven to be true.  At least, not yet.  Question everything but stay grounded.

When it comes to “anything government”  I always remember that whenever I sign a waiver or release form I make sure I take the time to read every detail.   You never know what has been added to the release form or waiver.  Just like a bill in Congress, you could be signing away something that has nothing to do with what you are there for.

One source on DNA test kits click here.

For more details on covid-19 tests kits click here

Respectfully

Deplorable Patriot

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0
 

National Guardsman At NY Testing Center Says Media Has Overblown COVID19 Pandemic “It’s the Flu!”

When it comes to covid-19,  no matter how different our lives may be from one to another, all of us are in this together.  It’s important that we make it through this.   It’s important that something like this never happens again.  Before that happens we must know the truth.  How far are you willing to go to get it?

Video comes from Project Veritas.

In the video we watch  James O’Keefe as he goes to get a covid-19 test.  As to be expected, with the cameras rolling.  He comes across several men in the military that have control of the testing site.  Some of the soldiers claim covid-19 pandemic  is way overblown.  They say “It’s just the flu.”

That sounds about right.  This years  flu season  is supposed to one of the worst it has ever been.  According to CDC data, the P & I Mortality rate is 7.4.  this year.  That’s 1 point above epidemic.  But we don’t hear about it.

Covid-19 has the same symptoms and can be as destructive as Influenza(the flu).  Although they seem to be equally as dangerous, they are classified as to different types of viruses.

We are told that covid-19 may have come from bats.  I’ve not seen any evidence of coronavirus in bats.  For Influenza, I have.  “Bat Influenza“.

Bat flu refers to influenza A viruses found in bats. Bat flu was first discovered in “little yellow-shouldered bats” in Guatemala during a study conducted in 2009 and 2010 by experts from CDC and the Universidad del Valle (University of the Valley) in Guatemala (1). Bat flu viruses have since been detected in some other species of bats in Central and South America.

To read more from this source click here.

*2009 was the year of the Swine flu(H1N1) outbreak first discovered in Mexico city. It started in January 2009 and lasted until August 2010.

 Testing of the bat flu virus’s genome suggests that its internal genes are compatible with human flu viruses, so CDC scientists cannot rule out the possibility of these viruses eventually becoming capable of infecting humans.

to read more from this source click here.

In order for the bat flu have an effect on humans we are told that it would have to passed on to an animal, and from that animal on to a human.  This is something that is plausible to happen in nature.  It’s also something that can happen in a lab.

Influenza A virus reservoirs in animals have provided novel genetic elements leading to the emergence of global pandemics in humans. Most influenza A viruses circulate in waterfowl, but those that infect mammalian hosts are thought to pose the greatest risk for zoonotic spread to humans and the generation of pandemic or panzootic viruses. We have identified an influenza A virus from little yellow-shouldered bats captured at two locations in Guatemala. It is significantly divergent from known influenza A viruses. The HA of the bat virus was estimated to have diverged at roughly the same time as the known subtypes of HA and was designated as H17. The neuraminidase (NA) gene is highly divergent from all known influenza NAs, and the internal genes from the bat virus diverged from those of known influenza A viruses before the estimated divergence of the known influenza A internal gene lineages. Attempts to propagate this virus in cell cultures and chicken embryos were unsuccessful, suggesting distinct requirements compared with known influenza viruses. Despite its divergence from known influenza A viruses, the bat virus is compatible for genetic exchange with human influenza viruses in human cells, suggesting the potential capability for reassortment and contributions to new pandemic or panzootic influenza A viruses.

to read more from this source click here.

That’s something to think about.

I’ve seen articles that reference this same information on bat influenza that I have provided today.  They imply  Covid-19 is a mutated version of bat influenza..  If that were the case then why do they call it a coronavirus instead of bat influenza?

Is the virus class “coronavirus” just a name for bio-engineered versions of  viruses like influenza?

I would like to say thanks to James O’Keefe and Project Veritas for the video.  Anyone that would like to get involved with Project Veritas (wear a hidden camera, research, tech support, whatever available)  click here

Please  let me know your thoughts on this.

Hat tip to Tinman “no have Kung Flu* on Twitter for the video suggestion and link.

https://twitter.com/Tinman1295?s=0

Respectfully

Deplorable Patriot

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0Shares
0 0