Category Archives: abortion

Glenn Beck says electing Hillary Clinton is ‘moral’ and ‘ethical’

It’s one thing for Glenn Beck to oppose Donald Trump by supporting Ted Cruz in the GOP primaries, telling Evangelicals that if they don’t vote for Cruz, they’re not being true Christians — which is quite an act of chutzpah on Beck’s part since he is a lapsed Christian who’s turned Mormon.

But now — take your pick of metaphors — Beck has really jumped the shark, jumped off the cliff, gone cuckoo for cocoa-puffs.

Glenn Beck on Fox News, January 2014

Glenn Beck on Fox News, January 2014

On October 8, 2016, this is what Glenn Beck wrote on his Facebook page:

“Every person, each of us must decide what is a bridge too far.

Mike Lee has obviously reached that point, where the moral compromise his party is asking him to make is simply beyond what is acceptable.

It is not acceptable to ask a moral, dignified man to cast his vote to help elect an immoral man who is absent decency or dignity.

If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice.

If she is elected, the world does not end…. Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media , through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal.

Her nominees can be blocked, her proposed laws voted down.

The alternative does not offer a moral person the same opportunity. If one helps to elect an immoral man to the highest office, then one is merely validating his immorality, lewdness, and depravity.”

Note that Beck calls Trump immoral, lewd, and depraved, but not Hillary.

And yet in May of this year, this is what Beck wrote about Hillary:

“Hillary Clinton, the woman many consider to be the odds-on favorite to become the next president of the United States, believes that in order to bring about the kind of abortion-on-demand world she envisions, ‘deep-seated cultural codes and religious beliefs have to be changed.’ Additionally, she believes that ‘the unborn person doesn’t have constitutional rights.’”

5 months later, however, Glenn Beck says electing the same pro-abortion-on-demand Hillary is “moral” and “ethical”. So much for Beck being pro-life. It’s all meaningless talk on his part, for the man really has neither principles nor abiding beliefs.

After his “election of Hillary … is a moral, ethical choice” remark was picked up by bloggers, Beck denies everything. His words were misunderstood, taken out of context! Woe is me!

He says on his blog on Oct. 11, 2016:

“It has been widely reported I am either endorsing or voting for Hillary Clinton as president, and I stated that voting for Hillary is the ‘the moral and ethical’ choice. Let me be clear (and thankfully this is an easy one to dispel): None of this is true.

I am firmly against both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton as potential presidents of the United States of America. I believe that neither candidate has the values, decency or principles to be the leader of the free world. And for the millionth time (though I presume not the last), I reject the notion of a binary choice. I will not vote for the ‘lesser of two evils.’

My Facebook post included in these reports is very clear:

‘If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice.’

The ‘moral, ethical’ reference is not directed towards Hillary Clinton, but rather my decision to stand for and on my principles against the candidacy of Donald Trump. If other people share this principle and hence, Clinton is elected, at least my choice of sticking to my principles is, to me, moral and ethical.”

No cigar, Beck. You can’t wiggle out of this one.

In your original Facebook comment, you clearly and unambiguously said that if, by opposing Trump (“standing against Trump”), “the consequence . . . is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton” as POTUS, “so be it,” because “At least it is a moral, ethical choice”.

Undertaking a behavior with full deliberation and knowing full well that doing so will result in the election of a deeply immoral, lewd, and depraved woman to the most powerful seat in America and the world, cannot in any sense be “moral” or “ethical”.

grinding HillaryHillary foul-mouthHillary Clinton what difference does it make

See also “Bombshell: Clinton Foundation paid Glenn Beck & Bill Kristol to suppress votes?


Attn. Clinton Foundation: Hurricane-ravaged Haiti needs the $2B in donations you stole from its earthquake relief funds

Once again, Haiti is devastated by a natural disaster, this time by Hurricane Matthew.

Before the hurricane plowed into the southeast U.S. coast, where it caused major flooding and widespread power outages, “Matthew” had struck Haiti, the poorest country in the Americas, killing 877 people and displacing tens of thousands.

No doubt, there’ll be a drumbeat asking you to donate to Haiti’s hurricane relief, if it hasn’t already begun.


Below are the reasons why.

In 2010, a massive 7.0 earthquake devastated Haiti, killing more than 200,000 people, leveling 100,000 homes, and leaving 1.5 million people destitute.

As Dinesh D’Souza recounts for National Review, July 18, 2016, countries around the world, as well as private and philanthropic groups such as the Red Cross and the Salvation Army, provided some $10.5 billion in aid, with $3.9 billion of it coming from the United States. But very little of this aid money actually got to poor people in Haiti.

Bill Clinton & George W. Bush inspected the devastation of the Haiti earthquake, March 22, 2010.

Bill Clinton & George W. Bush inspected the devastation of the Haiti earthquake, March 22, 2010.

Bill Clinton was the designated UN representative for aid to Haiti. Following the earthquake, Bill Clinton had with media fanfare established the Haiti Reconstruction Fund. Meanwhile, his wife Hillary was the U. S. secretary of state, in charge of U.S. aid allocated to Haiti. Together the Clintons were the two most powerful people who controlled the flow of funds to Haiti from around the world.

Read more about what the Clintons did with the billions of dollars meant for Haiti’s earthquake relief, here.

In 2015, sent an investigative reporter to Haiti, who was shocked to find Haiti still devastated 5 years after the earthquake, with many people homeless or living in self-made shacks, without running water or plumbing, despite the $10 billion in relief aid pledged around the world.

Here’s the video of the report;

Quotes from the above video:

6:28 mark: “So not only were no real homes built, but the survivors were left in the same primitive conditions as the refugee camps, squatting [among garbage] in a permanent reminder of our aid intended to give them.

Here’s an example of a “model home” built with our donation dollars for Haitians made homeless by the earthquake, which just stands there, unoccupied:


7:21 mark: “What’s odd is that the Haitians who received little to no foreign aid actually seem to be doing than those in the designated relief areas.

8:06 mark: “But there was one permanent structure that was built here for the earthquake survivors. For some reason the International Olympics Committee [IOC} thought that these people could use an $18 million state-of-the-art soccer field and recreation center [instead of plumbing and running water], adding insult to injury in a community lacking in even the most basic amenities.”

8:32 mark: “But this [the IOC soccer field] wasn’t the only strange reconstruction project we saw foreign aid invested in. Seven hours north of the earthquake, over $300 million of foreign aid was spent in the district of Caracol, [a town that wasn’t affected by the earthquake]…. But even though the town wasn’t affected, it didn’t stop our government aid from being invested in another soccer field [that actually cost $2.9 million to built, not the $300 million spent by the contractor. The State Department’s records say the cost of constructing the Caracol soccer field was even lower — $2.3 million.] And when we looked at the cost of many other projects, we noticed the same contractor kept coming up [– Chemonics, the largest USAID recipient across the world, including in Afghanistan….] There’s been a number of audits that have shown lack of progress, the lack of oversight. Here, this is a contract of Chemonics with USAID. All the cost information throughout the contract, that’s all redacted, and we just have [blank] pink sheet after pink sheet…25 pink sheets [in total].”

11:21 mark: “USAID’s real investment here [in Caracol] is the more than $260 million spent for the Caracol industrial park — the largest U.S. development project in the aftermath of the earthquake…. [T]here’s paved streets, there’s sidewalks, there’s electricity and there’s drinkable running water which is actually unheard of in Haiti. Unfortunately, it only provides roughly only 10% of the jobs it promised. Its main tenant is a South Korean garment manufacturing company which enjoys cheap labor, tax exemptions and duty-free access to the U.S. market. Worst of all, none of the employees we met were earthquake survivors, and the plan for the park was drawn up before the [earthquake] disaster even happened.

13:17 mark: “While many attempts to reform the system have been made, to date, nothing has changed, and the result is the failed disaster capitalism we see in Haiti, where aid has become an industry of pro-profit companies. In fact, only a month after the earthquake, our own U.S. ambassador was quoted in a leaked document claiming ‘The gold rush is on.’ And now these same companies are using lobbying groups to ensure reforms never come. It’s often said that waste, inefficiency, corruption, these are problems that are unique to the developing world, that are unique to Haiti. The reality is that these are actually fundamental aspects of the U.S. foreign aid complex. Instead of relying on potentially corrupt money, we simply give it to U.S. companies and allow them to take 25% off the top. It’s a different form of corruption, and without realizing that, we’ll continue to make the same mistakes going forward.”

I stopped donating to disaster relief funds years ago. The last one I donated to was the Catholic Relief Services’ (CRS) charity drive for the Philippines after Typhoon Yolanda in 2013. I will never do that again, as CRS is staffed by pro-aborts. See “98% of Catholic Relief Services’ contributions go to pro-abort politicians”.

The standard advice for donating to charities is “Keep it local,” i.e., donate only to local charities where you can keep a better eye on how your donations are spent.

See also:


Samsung washing machines that Hollyweird libtards are paid to promote are exploding with 21 reported cases

Once I saw Hollyweirds Kristen Bell (an enthusiastic Planned Parenthood supporter) and her husband Dax Shepard promoting this washing machine, I vowed never to buy a Samsung product. Now I have another reason to avoid them all together.

From Digital Trends: The United States Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued a warning that several of Samsung’s top-loading washing machines have been exploding. Although the incidents seem to have taken place throughout the year, for hardware created over the past half decade, this comes at a terrible time for Samsung which has recently had to recall so many Galaxy Note 7s over explosion fears.

Affected washing machines are said to be of the top-loading variety and were manufactured between March 2011 and April 2016. Although there does not appear to be much of a consensus on which models and age does not appear to be a factor.

ABC is reporting two incidents of different models exploding, sending nuts, bolts, plastic ,and water everywhere. In total, 21 incidents have been reported since early 2015 and two of those people are suing Samsung. Their lawyer claims a support rod within the top-loading mechanism can come loose during the spin cycle, causing the machine to tear itself apart in dramatic fashion.

For now, Samsung is not taking responsibility for anything, claiming there can be “abnormal vibrations,” when owners load the machines with bedding, bulky items or items that are water resistant. It urges anyone who uses its washing machines to use a delicate spin cycle in those cases.

It also said that it was “in active discussions with the CPSC to address potential safety issues related to certain top-load washing machines,” and pointed out that consumers had completed millions of washes safely over the past five years without incident.

To find out if your washing machine is potentially dangerous, head to this Samsung support page and input your unit’s serial code.

While we will need to wait for the CPSC’s investigation to discover what is causing these washing machines to explode, this could hardly come at a worse time for Samsung. Recent weeks have seen it recalling as many as a million Galaxy Note 7s for explosion fears in the U.S. alone. However, it may not even have helped, as there is a report of ‘safe’ Note 7 smartphones having similar exploding issues.


African dictator is a cannibal; eats opponents’ testicles & brain

We are in the 21st century, but the president of Equatorial Guinea is a cannibal.


John Shammas reports for the UK Mirror, Sept. 11, 2016, that Teodoro Obiang Nguema, 74, has ruled over Equatorial Guinea since 1979.

Nguema came to power by overthrowing his uncle, Francisco Macias N’Guema, who had Nguema’s family murdered.

Known as “torturer-in-chief,” not only does Nguema torture and oppress his political opponents, many say his depravity goes even deeper. They claim Nguema is a cannibal who skins his opponents alive and devours their testicles and brains as a way to boost his sexual prowess.

Severo Moto, a political rival of Nguema, said in a 2004 interview with Spanish radio: “He has just devoured a police ­commissioner. I say devoured because this commissioner was buried without the testicles and the brain. [He] wants me to go back to Guinea … [so he can] eat my testicles.”

Having remained in power for almost 40 years, Nguema is said to increasingly believe himself to have God-like powers. One of his former advisors said: “He can decide to kill without anyone calling him to account and without going to hell because it is God himself, with whom he is in permanent contact and who gives him this strength.”

There are unconfirmed rumors that Nguema has prostate cancer. His son, Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue, 46, who serves as a vice president, would be his natural successor.


By the way, Equatorial Guinea has the lowest average IQ in the world, of 59, which means the average Equatorial Guinean is a moron (the definition of “moron” is an IQ of 51 to 70).  See “How smart or stupid is your country?

There are other African cannibal dictators, including:

  • Idi Amin, who ruled Uganda from 1971 to 1979, was reported to cannibalize the bodies of his political opponents but kept their severed heads in refrigerators. After he was deposed in 1979, he first fled to Libya, then Saudi Arabia where he lived the last few years of his life, paid $30,000 a month by the Saudis, until his death in 2003 at age 78 from kidney failure.
  • Jean-Bédel Bokassa, the leader of the Central African Republic from 1966 to 1979, was also said to be a cannibal. In 1977, emulating his hero Napoleon, he crowned himself emperor of the Central African Empire in a ceremony costing $20 million (11.8m). Overthrown by French troops in 1979, Bokassa went into exile in France where he had a château and other property bought with the money he had embezzled. He returned to the Central African Republic in 1986 and was put on trial, found guilty of the murder of schoolchildren and oher crimes, but was cleared of charges of cannibalism. His death sentence was commuted to life in solitary confinement, but was freed just six years later in 1993. In 1996 he proclaimed himself the 13th Apostle and claims to have had secret meetings with the Pope. He died of heart attack few months later.
  • Joshua Milton Blahyi, a tribal priest-turned-army leader known as General Butt Naked (for going into battle naked, believing that his nakedness protected him from bullets), led a mercenary unit during the First Liberian Civil war in 1989. (Liberia was founded in 1847 by the first “back to Africa” movement of American blacks.) Blahyi claimed he had a vision in which he was told by the Devil that he would become a great warrior and should practice human sacrifice and cannibalism to increase his power. He said in an interview with the Seattle Post-Intelligencer: “Sometimes I would enter under the water where children were playing. I would dive under the water, grab one, carry him under and break his neck. Sometimes I’d cause accidents. Sometimes I’d just slaughter them.” In January 2008 Blahyi confessed to taking part in human sacrifices which “included the killing of an innocent child and plucking out the heart, which was divided into pieces for us to eat.” In 1997, Blahyi converted to Christianity and is now the president of the End Time Train Evangelistic Ministries Inc, headquartered in Liberia. In the United States, Pastor Robert Letner Jr. founded the Trilateral Church of the South based on Blahyi’s message of redemption and forgiveness.

See also “Nigeria restaurant serves roasted human heads“.

We recoil in horror, as we should, at these reports of African cannibalism, but what about the horrors that go on every day in Planned Parenthood clinics across the U.S., where the body parts of aborted unborn humans are sold for profit? Hmm?


These Actresses Have Pledged to Stop Donald Trump

More Hollyweird actresses to add to your boycott list (if you even know who some of these womyn are).

From Cosmopolitan Magazine: Actresses Amber Tamblyn (Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants), Diane Guerrero (OITNB), Zoë Kravitz (Divergent), and others are joining over 30,000 women who have pledged to vote against Donald Trump. The celebs appear in a new PSA, unveiled Friday, for EMILY’s List’s “Women Can Stop Trump” campaign, which warns voters of Trump’s anti-woman policies and informs them about the sexist slurs he’s made throughout his career.

Trump has vowed to defund Planned Parenthood and appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade. He believes women should find new jobs if they are sexually harassed at work and blames victims for being sexually assaulted in the military. He has repeatedly made sexist and degrading attacks against women, calling women he does not like “dogs” and “fat pigs.” He once reportedly told a friend, “You have to treat [women] like shit.”

In the video, Tamblyn, Kravitz, and others read some of Trump’s offensive quotes aloud and urge women to get out and vote. “Women can and will stop Trump,” says Kravitz. Cosby Show actress Erika Alexander chimes in, “Because if we vote all together, we will decide who the next president will be.”

“The only thing more powerful than hearing Donald Trump’s own offensive words is when they are said by powerful women,” said Stephanie Schriock, president of EMILY’s List, in a press release.

Hillary supporter Stephanie Schriock

Hillary supporter Stephanie Schriock

In the 2012 election, women made up 53 percent of voters. “By coming together and pledging to stop Trump, women across the country — who make up the majority of voters — will prevent this dangerous, divisive man from becoming commander-in-chief,” said Schriock. “We are proud of our growing, grassroots campaign to make sure every woman in this country knows that together we have the power to stop Trump,”

“We can’t let him win,” says Tamblyn, as Guerrero adds, “We can’t let what he stands for win.”


Planned Parenthood-backed bill faces ACLU, media backlash in California

The truth shall not be exposed...

The truth shall not be exposed…

From Fox News: California lawmakers have OK’d a Planned Parenthood-backed bill that creates new penalties for distributing secret recordings of discussions with health providers – but civil rights and media advocates say the measure goes too far. 

The bill, which passed Friday and now goes to Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk, targets activists such as the Center for Medical Progress — which last year released secretly recorded videos purportedly showing activists discussing the purchase of aborted fetal body parts with Planned Parenthood representatives.

Truth hurts...

Truth hurts…

The videos, while criticized for selective editing, sparked significant outrage among Republicans who called for the organization to be defunded.

Recording and distributing a “confidential communication” without consent already is a crime under California law. However, the new bill adds an additional layer of penalties — including additional fines and up to a year in prison — specifically for recording a conversation with a health care provider.

Planned Parenthood supported the bill and said that in light of the videos, it had seen a nine-fold increase in violence against its facilities. “With the Internet and the tremendous wildfire nature in which news can be spread now through social media, we need to have a crime against distribution by those in particular who did the illegal recording,” Beth Parker, chief legal counsel for Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, told the Los Angeles Times.

The bill passed on a party-line vote. However, some voices often allied with Democrats were unhappy with the bill.

“We know of no legitimate governmental reason for singling-out disclosure of all health care provider communications for special criminal sanctions, making the bill vulnerable not only on First Amendment grounds but also on equal protection grounds,” the American Civil Liberties Union argued in opposition to the bill in June.

The Sacramento Bee reported that the measure initially stalled in the state Senate due to opposition from media advocates that it could prevent lawyers and journalists from doing their jobs. However, it passed after language was added that restricted who could be prosecuted under the law — which proponents said would prevent it being used against news organizations reporting on such videos.

“It is narrowly tailored to address the growing threat to health care providers,” Democratic state Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson told the Bee. (Jackson has been honored by the Planned Parenthood Action FUND for her courageous efforts to support reproductive rights.)


It did not appear, though, that those changes specifically addressed the ACLU’s complaints. The ACLU did not immediately respond to a request for comment from on Tuesday.

Even after the amendments, The Los Angeles Times’ editorial board on Aug. 31 called the move to give health care providers special protection “mystifying” and accused the lawmakers behind the bill of pandering to special interests.

“But make no mistake, this measure would heap more criminal and civil penalties on making a secret recording — an act that’s already prohibited by state law, even when done in the public interest — simply to satisfy an interest group popular among Sacramento Democrats,” the board said.

The editorial board warned that the bill could disincentivize potential whistle-blowers from recording abuses such as a patient who sees a doctor handing out opioid prescriptions too liberally. “The potential for unanticipated and unwelcome consequences is huge,” the board said.


Sunday Devotional: On slavery and welfare

Philemon 9-17

I, Paul, an old man,
and now also a prisoner for Christ Jesus,
urge you on behalf of my child Onesimus,
whose father I have become in my imprisonment;
I am sending him, that is, my own heart, back to you.
I should have liked to retain him for myself,
so that he might serve me on your behalf
in my imprisonment for the gospel,
but I did not want to do anything without your consent,
so that the good you do might not be forced but voluntary.
Perhaps this is why he was away from you for a while,
that you might have him back forever,
no longer as a slave
but more than a slave, a brother,
beloved especially to me, but even more so to you,
as a man and in the Lord.
So if you regard me as a partner, welcome him as you would me.

The above reading from St. Paul’s letter to Philemon is a powerful statement against both slavery as well as the institution of goverment-enforced welfare.

The letter was written by St. Paul during an imprisonment, believed to be in Rome between A.D. 61 and 63. The letter concerns Onesimus (pronounced “o-NEH-sih-muhs”), a slave who had run away from his master, Philemon (pronounced “fih-LEE-muhn”), an early Christian in Asia Minor who was a slave-owner and a minister of the house church that met in his home.

In their imprisonment, Paul converted Onesimus to Christ, then sends him back to his master, Philemon, with a private letter appealing on behalf of Onesimus, asking that he be welcomed not as a slave but as an equal — a brother in Christ.

By presenting Onesimus as “brother, beloved…to me, but even more so to you,” Paul voiced an idea that was revolutionary for, at the time, human slavery was an accepted institution that the Christian communities of the first century were in no position to challenge.

It is no wonder that the abolition movement that began in the 18th century in the UK and the US was pioneered, led, and staffed by Christians — a fact that is little known or publicized today.

Both Philemon and Onesimus were martyred at Colossaei during the first general persecution in the reign of Nero, and are regarded as saints by several Christian churches. (Note: The word “saint” simply means “holy”; the title of “saint” is honorific, a sign of our respect.) For the martyrdom of Paul, see “St. Paul, whom Christ struck blind”.

St. Onesimus

As for welfare, an institution that has become colossal and immovable in our time in the form of the bloated welfare state, there can be no more powerful statement against it than Paul’s words in his letter to Philemon:

“so that the good you do might not be forced but voluntary”

Charity is voluntary, which studies show conservatives give more in both money and services than liberals.

But welfare, the revenue for which is extracted via confiscatory taxation, is not charity because it is enforced, and an involuntary “good” is no longer a good.

And yet “liberal” Christians precisely support this enforced charity — an oxymoron — in the name of “social justice”. But then those same “liberal” Christians also are “pro-choice,” a euphemism for government-sanctioned abortion — the lawful killing of unborn and entirely innocent human beings, for whom Christ weeps.

Jesus laughs with babyMay the peace and love of Jesus Christ our Lord be with you,