Caroline Kennedy has seller's remorse about Obama

Rate this post

In the 2008 presidential campaign, despite his murky personal history of Marxist friends and associates, a junior U.S. senator of only two years named Barack Hussein Obama was elected to the presidency of the most powerful country on Earth.
Obama’s election was due in no small part to Ted and Caroline Kennedy, who sprinkled their “Camelot” stardust on the political neophyte with their enthusiastic endorsement.

He was just using you, Caroline

Writing in the New York Times, Caroline Kennedy — the only surviving child of former President John F. Kennedy — delivered this rousing endorsement of Obama: “I have never had a president who inspired me the way people tell me that my father inspired them. But for the first time, I believe I have found the man who could be that president — not just for me, but for a new generation of Americans.”
Three years into Obama’s presidency, however, the same Caroline Kennedy now regrets her endorsement. She now calls Obama “a liar”.
Jonathan M. Seidl reports for The Blaze, May 14, 2012, that in an explosive new book The Amateur, author Edward Klein asserts that the Kennedy family was bitterly divided in 2008. While Ted and Caroline went for Obama, Robert Kennedy Jr., son of the former Attorney General, and his sisters Kathleen Kennedy Townsend and Kerry Kennedy, were supporters of Hillary Clinton.
Fast forward to 2012. Caroline has undergone a transformation after several snubbings by the Obamas. She especially feels insulted by one particular snubbing, when a vacationing Obama refused to meet with her despite her home being in the vicinity near Martha’s Vineyard.
Author Edward Klein quotes a family member on Caroline’s transformation:

“Through these [spies that the Kennedy family has in the Obama administration] and other people, Caroline heard back that there was a lot of nasty shit being said about the Kennedys by the president and Michelle. There were catty remarks about how badly the Kennedy women dressed, and how their houses were shabby and threadbare. Caroline got the impression that most of this negativity was coming from Michelle, who didn’t want the Kennedys to be part of the administration for fear that they would have too much influence over the president.

Gradually, Carline began to change her tune and side with Bobby and Kathleen [Kennedy Townsend] against the Obamas. Unlike Jackie, who was completely a-political, Carline is a liberal with a capital L. When Obama didn’t raise taxes to balance the  budget, Caroline marked him down. In her eyes, he‘s a mess because he doesn’t follow the liberal bible on politics. More important, Caroline discovered that the Obamas didn’t give a damn about her support. […]

It really annoyed Caroline when comparisons were made by the media between Michelle and Jackie. Caroline had a word for such comparisons; she called them ‘odious.’ She really got annoyed. And when she began to fall out of love with the Obamas, love was replaced by outright scorn. Now she says things about Obama like, ‘I can’t stand to hear his voice any more. He’s a liar and worse.’”

Ethel Kennedy, “the matriarch of the family,” similarly felt scorned, according to Klein. He tells a story of her invitation — extended to the First Family — being ignored by the Obamas. She got so upset “that she went on a rampage inside her house, cursing the president and turning over furniture.”
And to top it all off, Caroline believes “that as a loyal Democrat, she has nowhere to go, no one else to possibly support except Obama” and “the Obamas know that she has nowhere else to go, so they see no point in being nice to her.”
From Edward Klein’s account, one concludes that what ticked off Caroline and Ethel Kennedy is not an ideological or political difference with Obama. What irks the two women is Obama’s “snubbing” them, that is, the two women’s vanity is pricked. In psychological parlance, Caroline Kennedy is now disillusioned about Obama because she has sustained a “narcissistic injury.”
Among the criterial attributes listed by the American Psychological Association’s Diagnostic Statistical Manual for the Narcissistic Personality Disorder are:

  • has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements);
  • believes that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions);
  • is interpersonally exploitive, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends;
  • lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others;
  • shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes.

These attributes are descriptive of the Obamas (Barry and Moochelle), but also of the Kennedys.
Being “interpersonally exploitive,” Obama exploited Caroline Kennedy for her endorsement in 2008, after which he no longer has use for her. And so, he couldn’t even be bothered to visit Caroline when the Obamas summer-vacationed in the Kennedy playground, Martha’s Vineyard.
Good grief. Did Caroline actually imagine the Obamas to have gratitude or empathy? — to “recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others”?
In the end, in the eyes of Barack and especially Michelle, Caroline and the other Kennedys are nothing more than a bunch of privileged white people.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Caroline Kennedy has seller's remorse about Obama

  1. Edward Klein has absolutely no credibility. He’s been caught in many outright lies in the past … The fact that you report this smear merchants lies as fact just goes to show how gullible and hate driven you are.

    • Edward Klein is the former foreign editor of Newsweek and former editor in chief of The New York Times Magazine. He frequently contributes to Vanity Fair and Parade; he has a weekly column in Parade called “Personality Parade” under the pseudonym “Walter Scott”. Many of his books have been on The New York Times Bestseller list. [Source: Wikipedia]
      Far be it for me to defend Klein, a reputable member of the liberal media. But if you accuse him of lying, do give us specifics, evidence and sources — without which you are guilty of exactly what you accuse Klein and FOTM: “smear merchant” with “absolutely no credibiilty,” “gullible and hate driven.”

    • And I’m sure that Joe McGinniss and all those that bought his book weren’t hate driven at all…
      Yet I’m sure The Enquirer was hate driven when reporting on John Edward’s affair.

  2. I think it will be amusing to stand back and watch the whole socialist-liberal agenda implode before our eyes. They are the suckers; we are the producers. What happens when the producers get tired of feeding the suckers?

  3. Klein recently co-authored an anti Obama BIRTHER book. He is HARDLY a liberal.
    Caroline Kennedy found out Klein was trying to publish a defamatory book on the Kennedy family using the same publisher that she used for her books — She made sure that the publisher had nothing to do with Klein after that …
    Now you think with Caroline’s noted views on this scum bag, that she would some how give him inside information on her feelings for Obama? .. Seriously? Are you really THAT gullible!
    Before you post outright lies , why don’t you actually try to research these claims for a FEW MINUTES using google.

    • You have problems with reading comprehension.
      I don’t know Klein’s politics. Do you? In my first comment response to you, I wrote: “Klein, a reputable member of the liberal media.” I did not describe Klein himself as “liberal.”
      “Now you think with Caroline’s noted views on this scum bag, that she would some how give him inside information on her feelings for Obama? .. Seriously? Are you really THAT gullible!”
      Please read my post again. Nowhere in it or Klein’s book is there a claim that Caroline Kennedy gave Klein “inside info on her feelings for Obama.” Klein’s source is a friend of the Kennedys. Seriously, are you really THAT reading-comprehension challenged?
      Lastly, please state what lies are contained in Klein’s book, The Amateur, and how you know they are lies. Since the book is being released today, unless you’ve read an advanced copy (which I seriously doubt because you’re a nobody), you haven’t even read the book. And you call us “liar”, “gullible,” and (in a rude deleted comment) “hypocrite.” You should be ashamed of yourself.

    • The “Birther” question was started by the Clintons, when running against Obama. It was started by another liberal, in other words. They knew something that others did not. They were silenced.

  4. This was piece spot on to my mind Dr. E! One would think that narcissists are not in need of the company of other narcissists. One is incapable of providing for the needs of the other. Sycophants are the types needed by both the Obamas and the K-clan.
    We’ve always enjoyed Cape Cod. However I have neither the inclination nor the funds to visit the Vineyard. One can’t help but wonder why any Democrat politician would ever go near that place, aside from the K-clan. They obviously marked their territory (Thanks Uncle Ted!) many moons ago. But the arrogance of a Democratic POTUS being there and not making a token visit when invited? It’s unfathomable. Even for me a conservative, so I can only imagine the insult the K-clan must have felt.
    I think these old school liberals are becoming frightened by both the speed and brash style in which the bald Marxists are phasing them out. There is nothing refined or comforting to be found in this man-child and his mothley crew . There is nothing even remotely American about him. I can only imagine the chills Caroline must have felt when she realized who and what she had endorsed. I am of course giving her the benefit of the doubt on still having a soul.

  5. Picking up on the snubbing ploy was very insightful. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned (paraphrasing). Don’t white liberals understand? They’re still white! Poor Caroline, being played for a fool with nowhere else to go. Should’ve paid more attention to her family history and learned something from old Joe.

  6. Sorry all, I meant of course “This piece was spot on to my mind Dr. E!” I’m either selectively dyslexic or bass ackwards. Only time of the some though!
    One last thought on this piece. Doesn’t it seem that the Clintons, no matter how battered, always choose to stay close to power. If there’s anyone that should have distanced themselves from BS it should have been Hillary. But what do I know? I have high self-esteem.

    • Doing some research, you will find out that the Clintons were blackmailed to shut up about Obama’s lack of eligibility. The birther idea started with the Clintons, in other words. Now it’s seen as a right wing idea. Libs are great at obfuscating, name calling and redirecting attention.

      • Thanks for bringing that out Ginger! Libs can run with any side of an issue because the ends always justify their means. If a lib changes stances, they’re “evolving”. Whereas anyone else is a flip flopper.

  7. Here I thought I was done but no. Folks, is it just me or is Caroline starting to look like John Kerry in drag? i know that sounds catty but I calls ’em as I sees ’em.

  8. Well, don’t know about any of you, but I am actually reading this book on my Kindle right now…at Chapter 19 presently on Immaculate Intervention (Libya) and have read this part on the Kennedys’ buyers/sellers remorse. And I can offer two points: 1) everything Dr. Eowyn clarifies is correct; and 2) while Klein repeats himself more than I’d like (many recently published books I’ve read do this, maybe to pad them???? Kitty Kelly’s book on the Bush family did the same thing, and DK Goodwin took to cheerleading Lincoln’s sainthood at every chapter’s end in her Team of Rivals — all these good, credible books worth reading, albeit irritating on the padding), and he does a fair amount of interjecting his opinion shading, this book is nonetheless worth reading! Just stick to the subjects he brings up and the named sources and their quotes. There are a wide and deep variety of them! As for the anonymous sources, put them in context with other books read. Like, if one has read Laurence Leamer’s The Kennedy Women, as I have (2x!), Klein’s observations and the anon sources are not unusual and even consistent. But to a larger context, Klein’s book is doing a great job reminding me of ALL of the many many many contentious issues of the O Admin, and for that alone, does a good service. We need to remember the entire enchilada before voting again. As with anything, we have a free will and free mind to form our own conclusions! (Please excuse any misspellings or typos – the arthritis in my fingers is acting up today). xoxo

    • Thank you, Aimslee, for your book review! ♥
      I corrected the typos. 😉

    • Thanks, very much appreciated!

    • You seem to know a lot about the politics and the players of today; a subject I am desperately trying to make sense of (especially the past 4 years). I thought President Obama was a good choice in 2008 b/c as senator he voted against raising the debt ceiling during the Bush Administration in 2006. Now, here it is 2012 and I feel like Obama has pulled the rug out from under my feet. His policies are outrageous and I honestly have no clue what his plans are for this Country (which scares me, mostly for my children). And all of his 2008 campaign promises were put to rest the day he took office. Now I know that my 2008 support was naive, but I could only go with what was presented to the public at that time. I’m just an average working class American who does not have privileged information into Obama’s past or his plans for this Country. I am very weary of what the media puts out, and this time around I prefer to see or hear the information first hand or go to the source. You seem quite savvy on this topic in regards to the Kennedy’s and the Obama’s, therefore I am assuming you know a lot about the President also. So I ask you in all honesty, does Obama have something to hide that would be detrimental or embarrassing to American Citizens? I find myself now asking why didn’t he release his college records? Even if it was only his grades, why pay to have them sealed? Even when I have applied for jobs, I had to give potential employers permission to my “Official College Transcripts” otherwise, I would not have been considered a candidate for the jobs I was applying for. I know I should have done this 4 years ago, but I didn’t and I can’t change the past, but I can change the future. I take my vote very seriously and I think the Presidential Election is the most important election of all, so I am asking you outright if this is all true (about Caroline, the Clinton’s & the birther issue, paying 2 million $ to keep his college records sealed, a socialist agenda, etc.); all these rumors that have been floating around for years that I have ignored are now gnawing at me constantly and I need some answers. Can you help me out? I understand if you chose not too, but I would appreciate any guidance you can give me. And I will keep it 100% confidential if that is your wish. Thank you.

      • Dear Lisa,
        Congratulations on asking questions and thinking for yourself! That’s the first necessary step to free ourselves from being brainwashed by either political party. The questions you’re asking about Obama are sensible and intelligent, which all boil down to this one elementary question:
        Why does he continue to refuse to make public so many documents, including his kindergarden and college records; his Columbia U. senior thesis; his Select Service (military draft) registration; his law client list; and his actual original paper birth certificate. You can find all of that and more by going to our “The Obama Chronicles” page, especially the links colored RED. Click here for the Obama Chronicles page!

  9. LOL! they are starting to eat each other,like pac-man.

  10. JFK was a great American PResident, and by knocking the women in his life or who bear the same name the reason he was assassinated cannot be so easily dismissed as being trivial or narcissicistic inspite of the way he has been portrayed as a womanizer etc. Some of his speeches, especially about the Moon Mission and his intentions to increase the water management and prodction facilities in the US cannot ever be permanently erased from history, because of the ripple effect they have both had. Today, two of the most pressing needs are for the perpetuation of his drive towards space travel etc and the revival in interest of the North American Water and Power Alliance project, which was conceived on his watch. Perhaps we should spend more time looking at FDR and JFK and making sure that we get back on track with their successes rather than tie the Kennedy women into yet another book about the biggest failure of a U.S. Presidential Administration ever.
    Mr Klein no doubt hopes to make some money on the back of his book, and perhaps the title might be better attributed to him as an historian, since what you mention seems like gossip or hearsay, and not necessarily of much consequence. Fortunately the likes of Mr Klein or whatever his name is, and other writers who want to capitalize on the misery being inflicted on the inhabitants of this planet on account of poor U.S. leadership, is that events are changing the face of the situation so fast that even as the words of their literature hit the screen of the kindle they are no longer relevant because of yet another revelation about the collapse of the monetary system and the political players and pawns who are involved in the web of it, becomes more and more imminent…………………the LORD’s dunamis, and the power of the principles undergirding the U.S. Constitution are paramount, and the will of the LORD is sovreign, so as long as we stick to the highway to heaven instead of the road to destruction, we will avoid the pitfalls of even wanting to hang out with the lovely Obama’s. Fellowshipping with the saints is what the LORD prescribes and that’s the truth.

    • JFK, a habitual flagrant MARRIED womanizer who treated women like disposable tissue, was a great American president? Ever heard of the Seventh Commandment “Thou shalt not commit adultery”? But you call yourself a Christian and write comments about the LORD this and the LORD that!
      Sometimes, Alice, your comments not only boggle my mind, they make me want to puke.

      • Eo-
        This is too ironic! I quoted James 2:2-9 below….and then I read your comment! (Lol!) James 2:9-12 fits your comment too! 😀
        “But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.”
        (James 2:9-12 KJV)

      • Hello. I wasn’t referring to his morals, I was referring to the vision of what he had for a manned mission to Mars, and also to his desire to increase water management facilities so that agriculture etc could flourish here in the US. I realise that his failings may have eclipsed his stature as a president in your eyes, and yes, that’s understandable. I too have led a life full of mistakes that had tragic consequences because it’s impossible to escape the ramifications that accompany lousy behavior and poor judgment. However, I still am hopeful that NASA will be refunded and that the NAWAPA project gets underway. I also agree that it is really sickening that things have gotten so low and that moral standards and honesty and decency are not the top priority on everyone’s list.
        I have been redeemed by the shedding of the Blood of the Lamb, my LORD and Savior, Jesus Christ of Nazareth and forgiveness of my sins was part of getting saved, of having a conversion experience that caused for me to be born again. The relief of being forgiven and redeemed in God’s eyes has made me concentrate less on people’s failings now, because of my own transgressions, of omission and comission, and it may have coloured my view of things differently from other people. I never intend to fill you with disgust by my comments, so once more I stand corrected and feeling totally crushed, but that’s a good thing. Best regards as always. AW

        • Alice, where I have difficulty is with the compartmentalization. How do/can we separate the man from the president? It’s all a piece.

          • Hi again. Thanks for the thumbs up. I guess it’s a bit like when St. Paul was saying that he had a thorn in his side, and asked God to remove it, and God’s response was, My grace is sufficient, or when St. Paul was confessing that he sometimes had trouble not doing what he knew wasn’t right, in spite of knowing not to. Maybe JFK was demonized with a spirit of lust and wasn’t powerful enough spiritually to deal with it, or go and get purged of it. Maybe a coven of warlocks and witches were praying against him, or maybe he was downright arrogant and just thought that he could get away with being unfaithful to his wife, but didn’t realise that his good intentions for running the US wee going to suffer because Satan had a reason to have God allow him to attack the President. Anyway, the US did get to the Moon inspite of all his philandering and even Jerry Brown is talking about water management projects because CA is badly in need of more water resources. So there it is. I got saved nineteen years ago when I was 51, so had plenty of time to get into a lot of hot water, and I think JFK died when he was quite young, and maybe didn’t have the same opportunities that I did to repent and attempt to lead a holy life. That’s the way the mop flops.

            • Alice, there is something of what you’ve said about Kennedy not having the chance for redemption. I think he was extremely guilt ridden by how he came to power and by what he was made a part of once there. That he tried to correct and lash out at his handlers likely got him killed. I think often of his speech warning of the secret societies and the hidden agendas but then you must realize that he could have left those societies and agendas behind early in life. He was part of the problem and spoke out from guilt. He was a glorified mob informant. He chose poorly.
              The womanizing was the least of his transgressions to my thinking. The damage JFK did to generations of people dwarfed his egotistical, sexual jaunts as well as the few times in his life where he went off the reservation and made positive contributions. I sincerely doubt he was a war hero. You can look up the stories that go counter to the accepted accounts. God bless the Internet! His family’s power and money shaped his image, not his deeds. The lives of his brothers ran parallel to his. They were born into evil and chose to stay there. The perception of good deeds were their cover. Who but a Kennedy could get away with murder in front of the entire nation? They knew right from wrong, we don’t have to continue to justify their poor choices.
              This man, these men, were not a hairsbreadth from sainthood. Just my opinion. My sincere thanks for yours.

      • I’m very new here as you know Dr E. I thought the very same regarding the Irish-Mafioso-in-chief and held back as it didn’t seem my place to comment on a long-timer.

        • Celestine,
          All commenters are equal on FOTM! Thank you for your support — and a VERY warm welcome to our Fellowship! 😀

          • Thank you Dr Eowyn and everyone here. It is a vibrant and open forum and I enjoy paticipating and simply reading. There’s much to absorb. Thanks again.
            For all concerned, Celestine or “CC” as my friends often call me is just fine. And of course “moniker of the moment” where warranted. 😉

    • Chapter 2 (beginning with v.2 and ending with v.9) from the book of James seems to be quite appropriate for this situation…wouldn’t you agree?
      “(2) For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment; And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool: Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts? Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him? But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called? If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.”
      (James 2:2-9 KJV)

      This was what my Bible study covered this morning. How convenient! 😀

  11. I have no sympathy for Caroline Kennedy with regard to her being snubbed by the king. She aligned herself with a rabid abortion proponent, an individual who has no qualms with late term abortions, in killing little babies. I agree with Dr. Eowyn, that she has suffered narcissistic injury – birds of a feather will flock together. The picture makes me sick.

  12. Mary Kennedy, 52, estranged wife of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., found dead in his NY home:,0,1869527.story

  13. Harry reyhing

    I have no respect for the Kennedy clan than i have for obama.They are all typical hardcore liberals very pro killing unborn babies and all for promoting gay sex perversion.the Kennedys are NOT true catholics.they sold out Jesus and his Church a long time ago for power money and votes.

  14. Why didn’t they get Caroline braces? Wow, that’s some really horrible teeth! But that’s but that’s beside the point. I’m just sick of all the Kennedys and especially Obama and their socialist-liberal agenda! I’m praying for our country and Romney to win.

  15. I don’t think the crux of the matter is whether Klein lied or not. The Kennedy’s live in their own uber rich bubble that doesn’t affect their lives whether the Democrat they support is anti-America or not. It is simply about the party and the power it has afforded them for decades as they must have their share of the royal cheers. I always laughed when I heard the media tag the Kennedy’s as America’s Royalty. Royalty? Old Joe Kennedy was nothing more than a glorified Rum runner.
    Caroline Kennedy is part of this power-machine and a Kool-Aid drinker of great proportion. A narcissist not-withstanding, she is a spoiled moron of epic proportions. How, in 2008, she could compare her father with this un-vetted, community organizer, with no viable credentials and a card carrying member of the socialist Democratic Party was unconscionable at the outset and one of the dirtiest tricks ever played by the Kennedys on the American people- especially the die-hard, brain dead, parroting, party faithfuls whose indoctrination is bone deep.
    JFK, albeit his adulterous affairs, was an American who served his country and grew up reveling in freedom, liberty and American values. He had no designs to enslave its citizens and hand the country over to be part of a globalized socialist movement as is Obamarxist’s ideology.
    “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country,” is nowhere in Obama’s agenda. It is in diametrical opposition to what he has done to this country.
    Obamarxist used her and all the other Kennedy’s and now he doesn’t need them anymore. The lesson learned here is when you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas. It couldn’t happen to a more deserving fool than Caroline Kennedy; ‘Odious’ is the perfect descriptive word for both she and Obamarxist. It’s the pot calling the kettle black (no pun intended).

  16. Charlotter Ahern

    You obsess about his sexual activities..They were not good. But he was trying to get out of Vietnam, he was bucking the Federal Reserve, and swore to blow the CIA out of water. He also gave a powerful speech on the danger of secret societies that was so brave, and so prescient, I gasped the first time I heard it. You can get it on youtube. Just search “JFK warning secret societies.’ Paramount to Eisenhower warning about the military-industrial complex.
    While I appreciate Dr. Eowyn’s worrying about JFK’s treatment of women, as far as I have ever read, they were all eager and willing. I’d rather have a president doing women than other men. Anyway, it was his wife, not all of womankind, who was hurt. And that was sad.
    Anyway, JFK has continued to improve over the years that I have studied him. Few politicians can i say that about. I understand why so many wanted him dead.
    Caroline is not a narcissist exactly, but she’s been seriously shackled by an extreme liberal environment. She’s had no challenges after the terrible childhood losses. And of course her brother. But no challenges concerning her identity and survival.

    • No, I don’t “obsess” about JFK’s or anyone else’s sexual activities because I’m actually interested in many other issues and subjects, some of which are reflected in the thousands of posts I’ve written for this blog. You are the one who’s obsessed because you just wrote a long comment about them — which has NOTHING to do with this post, which is about Caroline Kennedy having seller’s remorse about Obama.
      Oh, FYI, I know about JFK’s warning about secret societies — long before you lecturing to us about it, treating us like ignorant oafs.

      • Ditto to you Dr. Eowyn! It never ceases to amaze me how so many individuals miss the point of the posts on FOTM. Perhaps it is their desire to use material fallacies, taking everyone’s minds off the real issues, a strategy that is used to avoid the truth. The fact is, that the king and his wife snubbed Caroline, even though they persistently asked for her endorsement. They used her and then disposed of her, which as you pointed out, is typical of a narcissist. They believe they are entitled people and have no empathy for those people they walk over during their narcissistic journey toward their fulfillment needs.

  17. Yet another example of how short-sighted a Democrat can be.

  18. welcome to the real world lady dealing with nigras


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.