Barack and Michelle Have a History of Poor Money Management

Rate this post

The above video clip from last month shows the president hasn’t progressed from the magical thinking of financial reality he first practiced with MichelleIn August, 2011, Fellowship of the Minds published this “Magic Beans” financial strategy practiced by the newlywed Obamas. 

Would you believe the “smartest man in the room” and his lovely and talented helpmeet, Michelle, have a poor track record in budgeting family finances?  Their behavior as the “First Couple” confirms these people are clueless on the value of money and where it comes from.  Indeed, Michelle referred to the first substantial income they had as a couple as “magic beans”, (the royalties from “Dreams of My Father”).  Prior to that, it sounds like they would have qualified for a Dr. Phil-style intervention for profligate spending.


President Obama’s troubling mantra: In debt, we trust

By Richard Henry Lee

Friday, May 1st 2009, 4:36 PM

It is no surprise that President Obama supports unprecedented spending and borrowing in the federal budget since he has never suffered any consequences from the excessive spending and borrowing in his private life.

And I’m not just talking about the First Lady’s $540 sneakers.

A close examination of their finances shows that the Obamas were living off lines of credit along with other income for several years until 2005, when Obama’s book royalties came through and Michelle received her 260% pay raise at the University of Chicago. This was also the year Obama started serving in the U.S. Senate.

During the presidential primary campaign, Michelle Obama complained how tough it was to make ends meet. During a stop in Ohio, she said, “I know we’re spending – I added it up for the first time – we spend between the two kids, on extracurriculars outside the classroom, we’re spending about $10,000 a year on piano and dance and sports supplements and so on and so forth.”

Let’s examine how tough things were for this couple using various public records.

In April 1999, they purchased a Chicago condo and obtained a mortgage for $159,250. In May 1999, they took out a line of credit for $20,750. Then, in 2002, they refinanced the condo with a $210,000 mortgage, which means they took out about $50,000 in equity. Finally, in 2004, they took out another line of credit for $100,000 on top of the mortgage.

Tax returns for 2004 reveal $14,395 in mortgage deductions. If we assume an effective interest rate of 6%, then they owed about $240,000 on a home they purchased for about $159,250.

This means they spent perhaps $80,000 beyond their income from 1999 to 2004.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Barack and Michelle Have a History of Poor Money Management

  1. Ah, so that’s where the “investment” policy came from… obviously this made the value of the condo go up according to Keynesian economics.

  2. POS is shopping for Multi million dollar estates in Hawaii…ill gotten gains..He has earned no such rewards,,,He should occupy a cell in one of his FEMA camps,next to Holder,Ried,Pelosi,Franks,Dodd,and Hillary [to name a few}

  3. They obviously knew that the money was virtually worthless so had no regard for it. Mostly everything we need is extremely overpriced, it has been for years now and value is decreasing and cost increasing minute by minute. I think it’s something to do with the Law of Diminishing Returns. Anyone who can trade at a profit is losing it almost right away because it gets gobbled up by the “system” that is unsatiable. No amount of austerity or belt tightening is going to satisfy this greedy monster. The way these two have lived high on the hog since they became world famous celebrities, is not really very impressive. They may have thrown some huge parties and bought some designer clothing and taken rather a lot of “vacations” or trips representing the US as the style meisters they were intended to be, but really and truly the amounts of money they have gone through since their first condo and onwards is so little compared to the salaries of the banksters and Wall Street traders at the top of the tree. I think that Sarko is getting $75.000 a day for the job he has just taken on, and that too is peanuts in oligarch circles I believe, the amount of money some of the large corporations are sitting on is staggering, and we are just surviving on the few crumbs they choose to toss our way from time to time. What is really scandalous is that we are sitting around wondering what is going to happen next, while the wars are raging on and the Administration is discussing even more violence now in Libya against anyone they can cook up to look as though they were responsible for the attack on our Embassy and Ambassador plus his colleagues.
    I just read that it was figured out that to get rid of
    Assad et al it would have required 70,000 rebel fighters and they are hobbling along with only about 30,000 which is making it difficult for “them” to have their anticipated regime change as quickly as they had first anticipated. The oligarchs are maybe not coming up with enough money to back this particular ambition of Obama otherwise surely the requisite amount of rebels would be flocking to fight against Syria’s government.
    If they are not throwing money into that bottomless pit then maybe their money is being kept back to put on another “horse”.
    It is interesting to live in these dangerous days and have the opportunity to observe history as it’s being made, all through the ages many of our leaders, here and in the places we come from or our ancesters originate from, have lived lavishly.
    As for me and my house, we will follow Jesus.

  4. This explains a lot of the “out of control” spending! It’s a shame his followers don’t see the truth! It took sending more Republicans to Congress to start curtailing that spending! Romney/Ryan 2012-2020


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *