AZ Paper On Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number

An Arizona paper, Sonoran News, has picked up the scent of Obama’s curious Connecticut social security number. For the background on this, see my post HERE. For Obama’s multiple social security numbers, see my post HERE.
H/t Sol and Tina!
~Eowyn

Still seeking an explanation for Obama’s SSN 042-68-4425

By Linda Bentley – Sonoran News (“The Conservative Voice of Arizona”) – June 2, 2010
The SSA neither issues Connecticut SSNs to Hawaiian residents nor does it ‘recycle’ dead people’s SSNs
According to the Social Security Administration (SSA), the first three digits of every Social Security number (SSN) indicates the state in which the person resides. Only one number may be issued to any given person, even in the event of identity theft, and numbers are never “recycled” after a person dies.
The instructions accompanying the application to apply for an original SSN, apply for a replacement card, and change or correct information on a SSN record are riddled with the term “you must.”
The instructions begin by stating, “IMPORTANT: You MUST provide a properly completed application and the required evidence before we can process your application. We can only accept original documents or documents certified by the custodian of the original record. Notarized copies or photocopies which have not been certified by the custodian of the records are not acceptable.”
It goes on to state, “To apply for an original card, you must provide at least two documents to prove age, identity, and U.S. citizenship or current lawful, work-authorized immigration status. If you are not a U.S. citizen and do not have DHS work authorization, you must prove you have a valid non-work reason for requesting a card.” It specifically points out, “If you are 12 or older and have never received a SSN, you must apply in person.”
In January 2005, President Bush signed Public Law 108-458, the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which required the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Commissioner of Social Security and others, “to promulgate regulation establishing minimum standards for birth certificates,” which, among other things, mandated a requirement for proof and verification of identity as a condition of issuance of a birth certificate.
Public Law 108-458 limited the number of replacement SSN cards issued to any individual to three per year and 10 for the life of the individual, while establishing minimum standards for the verification of documents or records submitted by an individual to establish eligibility for an original or replacement SSN card, other than for enumeration at birth (EAB).
The Commissioner of Social Security was required to add death indicators to the SSN verification systems used by employers and state agencies issuing driver’s licenses and identity cards and allowed the commissioner discretion to add death indicators to other verification routines “as determined appropriate.”
The commissioner was also required to add fraud indicators to the SSN verification systems and make improvements to the EAB application process so as to “prevent the assignment of SSNs to unnamed children, the issuance of more than one SSN to the same child, and other opportunities for fraudulently obtaining a SSN.”
Additionally, the law prohibited federal, state and local governments from displaying SSNs on drivers’ licenses, motor vehicle registrations or other identification documents issued by state departments of motor vehicles.
SSN applicants must provide a birth certificate for evidence of age and, as proof of identity, a U.S. driver’s license, a U.S. state-issued non-driver identity card, or a U.S. passport.
The instructions state, “If you are not a U.S. citizen, we must see your current U.S. immigration document(s) and your foreign passport with biographical information or photograph.” In all caps it emphasizes, “We cannot accept a birth certificate, hospital souvenir birth certificate, social security card stub or social security record” as evidence of identity.
For evidence of immigration status, applicants must provide a current unexpired document issued by the DHS. If an international student or exchange visitor, additional documents may be required. It states, “If you are not authorized to work in the U.S., we can issue you a Social Security card only if you need the number for a valid non-work reason. Your card will be marked to show you cannot work and if you do work, we will notify DHS.”
Sonoran News contacted a congressional aide to ask if elected representatives, upon being elected and placed on the U.S. taxpayer-funded payroll, were required to fill out Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification. The instructions accompanying Form I-9 provide answers about the purpose of the form and when it should be used. According to those instructions, “All employees (citizens and noncitizens) hired after November 6, 1986, and working in the United States must complete Form I-9.” No exceptions are noted.
After contacting Member Services for the U.S. House of Representatives, the aide said she was told members are not required to fill out a Form I-9. She was told the reason the House does not require a Form I-9 from its members is because the Constitution requires anyone who runs for a seat in the House to be a U.S. citizen for a minimum of seven years. And, when a person runs for office, they must file proof with their state’s election office that they meet the requirements of the office.
However that does not appear to be the case. If it were, Roger Calero, a Nicaraguan national and convicted felon, wouldn’t have been able to appear on the ballot as the Socialist Worker’s Party candidate for president of the United States in numerous states.
No one appears to be responsible for certifying, under penalty of perjury, that he has examined one document from List A or one each from List B and C, and that the documents presented appear genuine and relate to the candidate, who simply signs a document swearing to be eligible.
There is no apparent law or written policy that exempts members of Congress or other elected officials on taxpayer-funded payrolls from filling out a Form I-9.
Sonoran News continues to seek answers regarding Obama’s fraudulent use of another person’s SSN, the use of which has been cemented in with his fraudulently created Selective Service registration.

Please follow and like us:
0
 

0 responses to “AZ Paper On Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number

  1. If you or I used a fraudulent Social Security Number and it was made public, we would be conversing with computers provided in the libraries of correctional institutions.
    I guess rank has it’s priveleges, and flagrant abuse of the law seems to be one in the U.S.A.
    Is this a great country or what?

     
  2. Frank,
    I knew an individual a long time ago that took my SS number and secured a fraudulent driver’s license with my name on it and then proceeded to collect credit cards. By the time it got back to me there was a little over 100 grand in purchases. Then that same individual changed his name and secured another SS card uner his assumed name and did the same thing all over again, about another 100 grand worth of charges. After he did that and thepolice were going crazy trying to find this guy he then took the SS numbers of dead people and secured identification to match them and went on another spending spree. Well, they finally caught him. He was acquitted of all charges.
    Today he owns a large restaurant in Grants Pass Oregon and is a pillar in the city. You go figure.
    Even if we prove this man in the White House is a fraud, a liar, and an Islamic terrorist we will never get a conviction with a Democrat sitting Congress.

     
  3. Stevie,
    I don’t share unless you’re a good lover—just kidding….I think

     
  4. Steve,
    I tried to get my wife to go along with it but she refused. Narrow minded broad..

     
  5. Ron Baby & steve should get a room.

     
  6. Doyle — have you seen the picture of Steve????
    This is one butt ugly –Inexplicable – thingamajig.

     
  7. Obama, like everyone else, must have and use credit cards. If he used a fraudulent SS# to get them, isn’t that a crime? In light of the controversy over Obama’s number, shouldn’t they investigate this? Since no one in the government seems willing to investigate this, his party controls the whole government, the private credit card cos should.

     
  8. Sir Wilhelm,
    You have a good point but the credit card companies make good money off of purchases. It would not be advantageous for them to put the squeeze on their king.
    Besides, Much of the message given on this subject is nothing more than rhetoric. There are a couple points that suggest an investigation is needed, like the SS card with the Connecticut number, but getting someone to look into it—that’s another story. We can make the noise but we can’t open the investigation and we have no power to indict other than use our indictment as a method of accusation..

     
  9. Ron Baby, that’s my point, there must be someone out there that has the power to indict that isn’t under his thumb, if they have evidence of a legitmate crime, like the use of a fraudulent SS# would have to be. If he’s indicted on one crime, the walls may come tumbling down on all his others, as often happens with criminals.

     
  10. Sir Wilhelm,
    There are any number of individuals who would love to bring this point to the forefront of the argument. I talk to individuals who are in the position but they realize that getting a bill introduced into a democrat Congress against one of their own is impossible. Look at the corruption trial of Jefferson from Lousyannie, or the alleged corruption of Al Franken. Take a look at the sweetheart deals of John Murtha–He died a hero in the eyes of the Dems and what about all the lies Burris told to get the Senate seat? How about my favorite, Ted Kennedy? This man was so corrupt that he had an odor about him, yet he died a hero. The democrats eulogize their own and they never dump them unless they step out of line.
    In the eyes of the Dems, Oslama is above reproach and will remain that way until we get them out of office.
    I believe the same as Steve and Eo–You just keep on pluggin those nails into the coffin until there is no more air for the fatherless misfit to breathe.

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *