Author Archives: Dr. Eowyn

Is the hole in Hillary Clinton’s tongue from cancer surgery?

Hillary Clinton, the Democrat Party’s presidential nominee, has multiple health issues. See:

The latest indicator that all is not well with her health may be the most disturbing.

Below is a PBS news video of Hillary’s acceptance speech on Thursday night, July 28, 2016. Pay special attention to the beginning of the video when Hillary was drinking in the crowd’s adulation, smiling with her mouth wide open.

Here are two screenshots I took at the 0:00 and 0:01 marks:

Hillary's tongue 0.00Hillary's tongue 0.01

Notice any thing odd about her tongue?

Here are two enlarged images of her mouth from the two screenshots above. I painted the yellow arrows pointing to a dark spot on her tongue:

Hillary's tongue 0.00Hillary's tongue 0.01

Soon after her acceptance speech, the Twitter-verse exploded with tweets of close-ups of Hillary’s mouth (see below), with the tag “Hillary’s tongue”.

Hillary's tongue1Hillary's tongue2

Is the hole in Hillary’s tongue from removing a stud, or is it from cancer surgery? According to the blog Lame Cherry:

“the only way one has one of these is that a physician has cut out a huge growth on the tongue, and the only reason one cuts out this huge of a growth on a tongue, is it is cancer.

Considering the depraved sexual world which Mrs. Clinton has been involved with in her entire life, it is not surprising that either in her lesbian encounters or her oral fellatio encounters with her husband, Bill Clinton, that someone gave Mrs. Clinton oral cancer in the HPV class of sexual cancers….

Hillary Clinton has apparently reached a second stage cancer which required radical surgery and has hidden it from the public. It appears this operation has been in the past several months and like Emailgate, it is just another one of those things that Hillary Clinton has kept hidden from the public, as in stealing the election from Bernie Sanders voters.”

WebMD says:

Tongue cancers are oral cancers that are differentiated by their location in the mouth and on the tongue. If the cancer is on the forward portion of the tongue, it is known as a squamous cell cancer of the oral tongue. If the cancer is located towards the rear third of the tongue, it is known as a squamous cell cancer at the base of the tongue.

The characteristics of these two cancers are quite distinct, and reflect the differences in their origins. The difference in origins is also the reason that the treatment of these two forms of tongue cancer is quite different. Oral cancers are relatively rare, representing only about three percent of all cancers.

This is what the Mayo Clinic says about tongue cancer:

Tongue cancer can occur…[i]n the throat, at the base of the tongue, where tongue cancer may develop with few signs and symptoms (hypopharyngeal tongue cancer). Base of tongue cancer is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, when the tumor is larger and the cancer has spread into the lymph nodes in the neck.

Increasingly, base of tongue cancers are associated with human papillomavirus (HPV), which has a profound effect on the prognosis and treatment of the cancer.

Treatment for tongue cancer typically involves surgery to remove the cancer. Chemotherapy, radiation therapy and targeted drug therapy may also be recommended.

From the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention):

HPV is short for human papillomavirus.

HPV is a group of more than 150 related viruses. Each HPV virus in this large group is given a number which is called its HPV type. HPV is named for the warts (papillomas) some HPV types can cause. Some other HPV types can lead to cancer, especially cervical cancer….

You can get HPV by having vaginal, anal, or oral sex with someone who has the virus. It is most commonly spread during vaginal or anal sex. HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI). Anyone who is sexually active can get HPV, even if you have had sex with only one person. HPV is so common that nearly all sexually active men and women get it at some point in their lives. HPV can be passed even when an infected person has no signs or symptoms. You can develop symptoms years after you have sex with someone who is infected, making it hard to know when you first became infected….

HPV can cause cervical and other cancers cancers including cancer of the vulva, vagina, penis, or anus. It can also cause cancer in the back of the throat, including the base of the tongue and tonsils

Presidential candidates are required to disclose their medical history. But in Obama’s case, during the 2008 campaign, he released only summary medical information from his personal physician, who pronounced him to be in “excellent health”.

We should demand that Hillary releases a full and detailed medical report, but I don’t expect she will comply. Afterall, she has already demonstrated that rules and laws don’t apply to her.

H/t FOTM‘s Steven Broiles.

See also:

~Eowyn

The Fruits of Globalization: Income for 81% of U.S. households flat or declined 2005-2014

An article in the latest edition of The Economist, titled “The new political divide,” correctly points out that what we saw in the recently-concluded Democratic National Convention and the Republican counterpart a week before is “a new political faultline: not between left and right, but between open and closed” — nationalist vs. globalist.

That same faultline is also found across Europe:

“Across Europe, the politicians with momentum are those who argue that the world is a nasty, threatening place, and that wise nations should build walls to keep it out. Such arguments have helped elect an ultranationalist government in Hungary and a Polish one that offers a Trumpian mix of xenophobia and disregard for constitutional norms. Populist, authoritarian European parties of the right or left now enjoy nearly twice as much support as they did in 2000, and are in government or in a ruling coalition in nine countries. So far, Britain’s decision to leave the European Union has been the anti-globalists’ biggest prize: the vote in June to abandon the world’s most successful free-trade club was won by cynically pandering to voters’ insular instincts, splitting mainstream parties down the middle.”

The article does not identify its author, which means it is an Economist editorial. From the editor’s choice of words — “open” vs. “closed” — you should have detected the magazine’s bias in favor of globalism, made more evident by the unnamed author calling Donald Trump’s Americanism “xenophobic” “anti-trade tirades,” and European political parties that champion national interests “ultranationalist” — a term used for fascist and Nazi movements.

Indeed, the article’s unnamed author makes clear his bias in favor of globalization, condescendingly lecturing to the readers that they must “Start by remembering what is at stake” — that globalization “has underpinned global prosperity for seven decades” and that “A world of wall-builders would be poorer and more dangerous.”

But is it really true that globalization — NAFTA, North American Union, open immigration, welcoming of refugees — has resulted in prosperity?

A recent report from McKensey Global Institute, the business and economics research arm of McKinsey & Company, says otherwise.

The report, “Poorer than their parents? A new perspective on income inequality,” by Richard Dobbs, et al., July 2016, found that instead of prosperity, the real incomes of most (65-70%) households in advanced economies like the United States had actually fallen or, at best, stayed flat in the years 2005 to 2014 — a decided contrast from the preceding period 1993-2005, when 98% of households in 25 advanced economies had seen real incomes rise.

As the bar-graph below shows, the situation in the U.S. is even worse. A whopping 81% of U.S. households’ real incomes fell or remained flat from 2005 to 2014.

% of households with flat or lower income 2005-2014

Here are the report’s other findings about those 25 advanced economies:

  • Between 2005 and 2014, the real incomes of more than 540 million people in 25 advanced economies were flat or declined.
  • The hardest hit are young, less-educated workers, which raises “the spectre of a generation growing up poorer than their parents.”
  • “While the recession and slow recovery after the 2008 global financial crisis were a significant contributor to this lack of income advancement, other long-run factors played a role—and will continue to do so,” including demographic trends of aging and shrinking household sizes.

The report warns that “Without action, this phenomenon could have corrosive economic and social consequences.” A survey conducted as part of the McKinsey Global Institute research found that a “significant number” of those whose incomes have not been advancing are losing faith in aspects of the global economic system. Nearly one-third of these people said they think their children will also advance more slowly in the future, and they expressed negative opinions about free trade and immigration.

Even worse, the report expects the situation to worsen, instead of improve:

“If the low economic growth of the past decade continues, the proportion of households in income segments with flat or falling incomes could rise as high as 70 to 80 percent over the next decade.

The report warns that even if the advanced economies see accelerated growth, leading to a 10-20% reduction in the number of low-income households, “the issue will not go away” because of robots — “a rapid uptake of workplace automation.”

The McKinsey Global Initiative report puts the lie to The Economist‘s crowing that globalization leads to prosperity. Globalization has benefited less-developed countries and multinational corporations at the expense of the middle and lower classes of the developed economies of the U.S. and Europe.

Lastly, if you’re a blue-collar worker or ex-worker, Hillary Clinton is the last person you should support, notwithstanding the labor unions’ fealty to her. Not only is she a Goldman Sachs whore, the just-concluded Democratic National Convention was dominated by big corporate lobbyists. In the words of Politico‘s Ben White:

Hordes of industry executives will descend on the city to celebrate Hillary Clinton’s nomination for president and renew close associations….

Goldman Sachs, which paid Clinton millions for private speeches, will be well represented in Philadelphia with executives Jake Siewert, a former Bill Clinton press secretary, making the trip along with Steven Barg, Michael Paese, Joyce Brayboy and Jennifer Scully, who was a major fundraiser for Bill Clinton in New York in 1992.

Blackstone, one of the nation’s largest private equity firms, will hold an official reception in Philadelphia on Thursday featuring its president, Tony James, sometimes mentioned as a possible Treasury secretary in a Clinton administration.

Hedge fund managers and top Democratic donors including Avenue Capital’s Marc Lasry and Boston Provident’s Orin Kramer will also be on the scene, as will Morgan Stanley executive and former top Clinton aide Tom Nides. Executives from Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and other large banks will also prowl the streets and barrooms of Philadelphia….

Republicans with ties to the financial industry will also be there, a sharp contrast to Donald Trump’s convention in Cleveland, which Wall Street largely shunned over fears of the GOP nominee’s populist agenda on trade, immigration and Wall Street reform.

See also:

H/t FOTM’s josephbc69

~Eowyn

Being kind to animals

Serial killers are psychopaths, without remorse or empathy. Before they “graduate” to killing humans, in their childhood or teens, serial killers are known to torture and kill small and, therefore, defenseless animals.

So, if you’re kind to animals, that means you have empathy. It is what makes you fully human.

Here are some examples of human kindness toward animals, whom St. Bonaventure correctly and aptly called “creatures without sin” for it is only we humans who are born as fommes peccati — tinder for sin.

  1. What two young men did to rescue a kitten:
    humans & animals1
  2. Two boys save a dog:
    humans & animals2

  3. A firefighter resuscitates a kitten:
    fireman resuscitates kitten

  4. Another fireman resuscitates a mama cat:
    humans & animals4

  5. This man built a ramp to his car for his dog who’s old with arthritis:
    humans & animals3

  6. Officers salute a heroic police dog:
    humans & animals5

  7. This man found a fox lying on the street, severely injured by dogs. With patience and love, the man nursed the fox back to life and named it Cropper. Cropper refused to go back to the wild and chose to stay with the man. The two have lived together for over six years:
    humans & animals6

  8. Dogs and cats are treated horribly in China, but not all Chinese are cruel. These dogs were in a truck, bound for slaughter, if it were not for an animal rescue center that stepped in and paid about $8,000 for the dogs:
    humans & animals7

  9. In Thailand, an elephant lost his foot and parts of its nose in a landmine. After a few months of recovery, he is fitted with a prosthetic leg:
    humans & animals8

  10. A girl saves a puppy from drowning:
    humans & animals9

  11. A Marine found 4 very small baby rabbits alone beside their lifeless mother in the woods. So he took the bunnies home, fed them until they were big and strong enough to be released back into the wild:
    humans & animals10

  12. A fire fighter gives water to a severely-dehydrated koala bear who survived a forest fire in Australia:
    humans & animals11

  13. Chris P. Bacon the piglet was born without his hind legs. So his owners made a wheelchair for him from K’Nex pieces:
    humans & animals12 Source: AnimalMozo

More “Being kind to animals” tomorrow!

H/t FOTM’s josephbc69

~Eowyn

 

Hillary Clinton uses Sandy Hook false flag to push for gun control

As predicted, in her acceptance speech last night at the Democratic National Convention, gun control is Hillary Clinton’s solution for the violence in our streets.

And as predicted, she made use of the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting massacre that took the lives of 20 little children, to manipulate Americans who feel instead of think.

Hitler children gun control

In her acceptance speech, Hillary said, referring to Donald Trump’s endorsement by the National Rifle Association (NRA), “And if we’re serious about keeping our country safe, we also can’t afford to have a President who’s in the pocket of the gun lobby.”

To tug at the heartstrings of gullible Americans, Hillary said:

“For decades, people have said this issue was too hard to solve and the politics were too hot to touch. But I ask you: how can we just stand by and do nothing? You heard, you saw, family members of people killed by gun violence.

By “family members of people killed by gun violence,” Hillary was referring to Erica Lafferty Smegielski, who was one of the speakers at the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday, July 27.

Erica Smegielski & Hillary Clinton (Getty Image)

Erica Smegielski & Hillary Clinton (Getty Image)

Smegielski is the daughter of slain Sandy Hook Elementary School principal Dawn Hochsprung who, we are told, was the first to be killed by Adam Lanza. Curiously, the dead Hochsprung managed to give an interview about the massacre to Newtown’s local newspaper, Newtown Bee. More curious still is the fact that the cache date of the Bee article featuring Hochsprung’s interview was December 13, a day before the massacre. See:

As recounted by Ricky Campbell for Heavy, July 27, 2016:

Erica Smegielski, the daughter of slain Sandy Hook Elementary School principal Dawn Hochsprung, is joining the likes of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Connecticut Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy Wednesday at the 2016 Democratic National Convention to tell her story, along with encouraging voters to support nominee Hillary Clinton and her stance on expanding gun control nationwide.

Smegielski, dedicated to closing gun law loopholes, has appeared in a Clinton ad called “My Mom,” where she says “no more families should have to go through what we have. Hillary Clinton is the only candidate that has what it takes to take on the gun lobby.

According to Heavy, Hillary “has put in a lot of effort this campaign to publicly talk with Sandy Hook families and discuss expanding gun control.”

In that “effort,” Hillary is aided by her willing accomplices in the media, notably CNN who, 3 days before the Democratic National Convention began, in the space of just one hour, obligingly flooded YouTube with one hundred Sandy Hook videos.

This is the same CNN whose live footage on the day of the Sandy Hook massacre inexplicably shows police and first responders running into an entirely different school than the supposed crime scene, Sandy Hook Elementary School. (See “CNN deception: Live aerial footage of police running into Sandy Hook was of another school“)

Back to Hillary’s acceptance speech last night.

Speaking out of both sides of her mouths, Hillary said:

I’m not here to repeal the 2nd Amendment. I’m not here to take away your guns. I just don’t want you to be shot by someone who shouldn’t have a gun in the first place.

We should be working with responsible gun owners to pass common-sense reforms and keep guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorists and all others who would do us harm.”

But the fact is we already have policies in place which are designed to “keep guns out of the hands of criminals”. It’s called background checks. So what other “common-sense reforms” that would “keep guns out of the hands of criminals” is Hillary proposing — reforms that she claims would not “repeal the 2nd Amendment” by further eroding the gun rights of law-abiding Americans?

Her campaign website affords a better idea of what those “common-sense reforms” means. It promises that “As president, Hillary will” do the following:

  • “Expand background checks to more gun sales—including by closing the gun show and internet sales loopholes—and strengthen the background check system by getting rid of the so-called “Charleston Loophole.”
  • Take on the gun lobby by removing the industry’s sweeping legal protection for illegal and irresponsible actions (which makes it almost impossible for people to hold them accountable), and revoking licenses from dealers who break the law.
  • Keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, other violent criminals, and the severely mentally ill by supporting laws that stop domestic abusers from buying and owning guns, making it a federal crime for someone to intentionally buy a gun for a person prohibited from owning one, and closing the loopholes that allow people suffering from severe mental illness to purchase and own guns. She will also support work to keep military-style weapons off our streets.”

Note that none of Hillary’s proposed gun reforms listed above would have prevented the Sandy Hook or the recent Orlando gay-club massacre because:

  1. The alleged lone shooter Adam Lanza’s guns were his mother’s, and Nancy Lanza obtained the guns legally by satisfying all background checks.
  2. The alleged lone shooter of Orlando, Omar Mateen, also obtained his guns legally. In fact, Mateen was an employee of G4S, a huge security firm with a multimillion dollar contract with the Department of Homeland Security to, ironically, identify suspected terrorists.
  3. Neither Lanza nor Mateen was a “domestic abuser,” had a criminal record (violent or not), or “severely mentally ill”.

So why then would Hillary use Sandy Hook to advocate for her proposed gun reforms that would not have prevented the massacre in the first place?

It doesn’t make sense. And, to quote Judge Judy, “If it doesn’t make sense, it isn’t true.”

Please don’t fall for Hillary’s ruse.

The Alternative Media have conducted diligent and exhaustive research on Sandy Hook, showing it was an elaborate false-flag to promote gun control. For exercising their First Amendment right of free speech, the researchers have endured online harassment, abuse, and death threats. Some paid an especially heavy price: film-maker William Shanley was arrested and imprisoned; tenured professor, Dr. James Tracy, was fired by Florida Atlantic University. (See “Sandy Hook: The hounding of Prof. James Tracy”)

For all the posts Fellowship of the Minds has published on this false flag, please go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page. See especially:

For the Orlando false-flag, please see our “Orlando Gay-Club Massacre” page, especially:

~Eowyn

FDA is considering lifting ban on sodomites as blood donors

HIV is transmitted from person to person via bodily fluids — blood, semen, and to a lesser degree, saliva.

From the beginning, most people with HIV/AIDS have been homosexual males. They are called by the politically-correct term, “men who sex with men” or MSM. But a more descriptively correct and, therefore, more appropriate term is “sodomites,” which denotes specifically men who have anal sex with other men — a sexual behavior that is highly risky for HIV and other infections because anal penetration tears the delicate skin of the anal cavity, which is not biologically designed for sexual penetration.

According to the FDA in 2009, “Men who have had sex with men since 1977 have an HIV prevalence . . . 60 times higher than the general population, 800 times higher than first time blood donors and 8000 times higher than repeat blood donors.”

After the explosion of HIV/AIDS into a national (and global) epidemic, in order to protect the safety of America’s blood supply and the lives of people who receive blood transfusions, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sensibly installed a lifetime ban on homosexual males as blood donors.

That policy began to change less than a year ago.

As reported by Tony Perkins for FRCAction, the legislative affiliate of Family Research Council, the FDA first did away with the lifetime ban on homosexual males as blood donors, and replaced it with a ban or deferral on only men who had had sex with men in the past year.

Now, even that ban is being challenged.

The challenge is spearheaded by freshman Congressman Jared Polis (D-Colorado), who self-identifies as “gay,” after the mass shooting on June 12, 2016, at Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, which killed 50 and wounded 53.

As reported by Colorado’s 9News, Polis was outraged that many of the friends and family members of the wounded were prevented from donating blood because of the revised FDA regulation banning blood donation from men who had had sex with other men in the past year.

Playing the victim card, Polis calls the FDA regulation “a relic of the stigma that LGBT people faced.” He told 9News:

“I’m … hopeful that we can remove the ban that the FDA has on gay people donating blood, because guess what? Many of the spouses and loved ones of the victims who need blood can’t even donate blood right now. It’s just a double tragedy that so many are facing the shortage of blood.”

Polis instead argues that restrictions on donating blood should be based on behavior rather than sexual orientation:

“It really doesn’t matter whether you’re gay or straight, what matters obviously is if you’ve used drugs or you’ve had unprotected sex. Those are the risk factors. It has nothing to do with whether you’re gay or straight.”

But Polis’ assertion of “a shortage of blood” is simply not true.

According to an Orlando Sentinel story on the afternoon of the shooting, within hours of the shooting, hundreds of Central Floridians had lined up that morning at the OneBlood blood center on West Michigan Avenue. Overwhelmed by people wanting to donate, OneBlood actually asked donors to stop coming, and instead schedule appointments over the next few days.

The FDA has invited the public to submit comments on Polis’ proposal to abolish the ban on homosexuals as blood donors altogether. Instead, the FDA would ask potential blood donors about specific high-risk behaviors. The FDA claims its decisions will be based on “scientific information” and declares that “the process must be data-driven.” But the FDA’s own statistics that the incidence of HIV is 60 times higher among sexually-active homosexual males than in the general population should be sufficient “scientific information” to reject Polis’ proposal.

By the way, there are compelling reasons that the Orlando shooting was a false flag. See “Orlando shooting: How we know it’s all a lie”.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 20: Congressman Jared Schutz Polis, D-CO-02, son Caspian Julian, and partner Marlon Reis attend 2013 Green Inaugural Ball at NEWSEUM on January 20, 2013 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Taylor Hill/Getty Images)

Freshman Congressman Jared Schutz Polis, 41, is Jewish and one of the wealthiest members of Congress with an estimated networth of $387.86 million. He made his fortune from a series of very lucrative business ventures that he later sold, including:

  • American Information Systems, an internet access provider, co-founded by Polis when he was a college student.
  • Bluemountain.com, a free electronic greeting-card website.
  • ProFlowers, the California-based online florist.

Polis and his husband, Marlon Reis, have a son, 5, and a daughter, 2.

See also:

H/t John Molloy

~Eowyn

DNC advertises on CraigsList for 700 actors to fill empty Convention seats

On the night of July 26, 2016, the second day of the Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Philadelphia, an ad was placed on Philadelphia Craig’s List asking for “700 actors” to fill empty seats in the DNC.

The reason for the empty seats?

In the words of the DNC ad, because “we are currently removing a number of people”, no doubt Bernie Sanders supporters.

Although the ad was since taken down, here’s a screenshot of the ad as proof (h/t Gateway Pundit). I added the red underlining for emphasis.

DNC CraigsList ad1DNC CraigsList ad1

And here’s a screenshot from MSNBC’s live coverage of the convention, showing many empty seats on Day 3 of the Democratic National Convention:

empty seats on day 3 of 2016 Democratic National Convention

As you saw for yourself, the ad explicitly said the people hired are to be “actors” who “will be required to cheer at all times”.

According to a July 27 tweet by Gateway Pundit‘s tipster, John Binder, the DNC also advertised for racial minorities to hold up Hillary signs at the convention:

CraigsList ad for racial minorities at DNC

Reporting from Philadelphia, independent investigative journalist Wayne Madsen observed yet another DNC fakery and hypocrisy — their indifference to the plight of disabled delegates:

Many of Monday night’s speeches at the convention were aimed at showcasing the Democratic Party’s commitment to disabled Americans. This editor, however, passed a number of Democratic delegates who were making the long two-mile odyssey from Oregon Avenue to the convention arena. Some were in motorized wheelchairs and one man with a leg problem was on a scooter. One lady suffering from some sort of paralysis was struggling on crutches. Some Democratic commitment to the disabled!”

It’s all theater, folks! –as fake as Hillary Clinton, pathological liar.

And as fake as these Democrats:

liberals are fakes

See also:

H/t FOTM‘s Glenn47

~Eowyn

Democratic National Convention calls SWAT team on Bernie delegates

This is how undemocratic the Democratic Party is.

Last night (July 26, 2016) at the Democratic National Convention, during the roll call vote to nominate Hillary Clinton as the party’s presidential candidate, some Bernie Sanders delegates undertook a peaceful protest in the convention hall with a sit-in, their mouths taped shut.

Bernie delegate with mouth taped shutBernie delegates with mouths taped shut

Democratic Party operatives called a SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics) team on the peaceful protesters!

Beginning at the 3:05 mark of the video below, FoxNews reporter Doug McKelway said:

“As you well know, the theme of this convention is ‘United together’. But the reality is something quite different — this is ununited and not terribly together.

We saw further evidence of that last night inside the auditorium when, during the role call vote and Bernie Sanders moved to nominate Hillary Clinton by acclimation, that many of his delegates stormed out of the convention center and they made their way to the media center not far from where we are. They staged a sit-in there, mouths taped shut, amongst the reporters. (Can you imagine trying to write a story on a deadline under circumstances like that?)

Well, decision was made to bring in a SWAT team. The SWAT team made the decision to contain the situation by quite literally containing the delegates.

And while all that was going on, back inside the auditorium, there was a celebratory feel to the whole affair as Hillary Clinton spoke to the delegations combined via video hookup.”

The Gestapo SWAT team held the Bernie delegates until Hillary finished talking.

This is just a preview of what America will be under a Hillary presidency.

H/t FOTM‘s bongiornoc and cs.

See also:

~Eowyn