Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo

messed up
Telegraph: A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and “unnatural” but is now widely accepted.
He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.
“A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner,” the judge said.
“If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you’d invariably have, they would say it’s unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone.(NAMBLA would approve.)
Judge Neilson made the comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when she was 10 or 11 years old in 1973 or 1974 but has pleaded not guilty to charges relating to sex they had in 1981, when she was 18 and he was 26. “By that stage they are both mature adults,” the judge said.
“The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become ‘free’ when the second relationship broke down. The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we’ve come a long way from the 1950s – when the position of the English Common Law was that sex outside marriage was not lawful.”
The comments were labelled misogynistic and “completely disgraceful” by Sally Dowling, the crown prosecutor, who has asked an appeal court to appoint another judge. “The reference to abortion is particularly repellent,” she said.
Dr. Cathy Kezelman, an advocate for preventing child sex abuse, said incest was horrific, regardless of the ages of those involved. “The relational betrayal of the horrors of incest between a brother and sister of any age is abhorrently criminal,” she told The Sydney Morning Herald.
Well according to liberals, #loveislove after all…
See also:


Rate this post

Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply

Notify of
Dr. Eowyn

Already championed by Hollywood and “intellectuals,” this is coming any day now to Amerika’s judicial system!


Gosh, this is so sick, I am unable to even comment. One twisted judge, glad Australia has him.
Maybe we can find an island somewhere and put all these deviates on.


For the first time ever, listening to a Boston radio station, I heard the host discussing somebody’s proclamation that “incest is the new gay.”
I cannot express my disgust. I have no words at the moment.


Left/libtards… talk about “defining deviancy down” so they can feel good.


This is just the next lurch from the left toward legalizing pedophilia.
It’s already underway right here in America.


Also for anyone curious, those people determining the health courses are largely biased from a kinsey-based angle (the future of sex education org for example, is related to SIECUS which itself is an outgrowth of kisney’s sick mad science, and gleaned from child abusers). If kisney’s woefully broken science is being used as a basis for sex education in public schools in the U.S. and other countries, then the end result should be expected to generate the same sort of people kinsey based his research on… namely child molestors and criminals.


[…] Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo […]