Audio evidence of Christine Ford’s political adviser plotting in July against SCOTUS nominee Kavanaugh

Ricki L. Seidman, 63, is a longtime Democrat Party cadre and a former Clinton administration official (Assistant to the President; Deputy Communications Director). She also actively worked against the Supreme Court nominations of  Robert Bork (1987) and Clarence Thomas (1990), and prepped Anita Hill before she testified before the Senate, claiming she had been sexually harassed by Thomas. Seidman was instrumental in getting the Anita Hill story made into a HBO television series.

On June 27, 2018, Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his resignation, effective July 31, 2018.

On July 9, 2018, President Trump nominated U.S. Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, 53, to the Supreme Court.

From September 4 to 7, 2018, the Senate conducted hearings on Kavanaugh’s nomination.

On September 12, 2018, the day that the Senate Judiciary Committee was scheduled to vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the top Democrat on the committee whose personal driver of 20 years is a Chinese spy, blocked the vote by forwarding to the Justice Department an anonymously-written letter, dated July 30, which accuses Kavanaugh of “sexual misconduct” with an unnamed woman when they were both high school students 36 years ago.

Four days later on Sept. 16, the author of the letter went public and identified herself as Christine Blasey Ford, 52, a research psychologist at Palo Alto University in northern California.

See “Christine Ford, the woman who accuses Judge Kavanaugh of sexual assault 36 years ago”.

On Sept. 20, 2018, The Hill reported that Christine Ford had hired Ricki Seidman to be her political adviser to help her navigate a potential hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Seidman confirmed her role in an interview with Politico.

Now, an audio has surfaced of political operative Ricki Seidman plotting a strategy to defeat Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination. The audio was recorded sometime in July 2018.

The audio begins with a female voice asking Seidman “what are the best tools that Progressives have to challenge” the Kavanaugh nomination.

Seidman responded by acknowledging that given the Republican majority in the Senate, it is not “extremely likely” that the Democrats can defeat Kavanaugh’s nomination (beg. 0:34 mark):

“So, I will say at the outset that while I think that looking at the numbers in the Senate it’s not extremely likely that the nominee [Kavanaugh] can be defeated, I would absolutely withhold judgment as the process goes on, and I think that I would not reach any conclusion about the outcome in advance.”

Seidman then touts her experience of having worked “on one side or another” of Supreme Court nominations since William Rehnquist, which is hard to believe because the Senate confirmed Rehnquist’s nomination in December 1971 when Seidman was 16-17 years old.

Seidman continues (2:01 mark):

“I think that the way in which ultimately the Kavanaugh nomination needs to be approached is understanding what that standard is and the fact that Kavanaugh doesn’t meet the definition. I worry a little bit about, um, I think in this initial period, my sense is that everyone still scurrying to figure this out, and in terms of the groups that care about the issues, Justice Kennedy’s [resignation] announcement was a surprise and caught most — not everyone — people flat-footed, and the [Trump] administration knows this and that is partly why there’s a rush to nominate someone so quickly. I actually think that Kavanaugh was likely already chosen at the point that Kennedy would resign and that there was a nice show of considering people, for the White House’s political reasons.

But I do think that over the coming days and weeks, there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee [Kavanaugh]….”

Then Seidman points out that Kavanaugh’s problem is the absence of women among his endorsers (5:30 mark):

“Of the 34 people who were the endorsers [of Kavanaugh] put out by the White House…none of them were women. Not a single one of them were women. And I don’t think it’s an accident that Kavanaugh spent so much time in his remarks talking about women because that is a clear problem with his record.”

Seidman acknowledges that only two Republicans would likely vote against Kavanaugh — Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. Seidman calls that “something that we have to get beyond” (7:50 mark).

Sure enough, a “strategy” did emerge “over the coming days and weeks” after Seidman said those words — a “strategy” that targets what Seidman had identified as Kavanaugh’s biggest problem, the lack of women among his endorsers.

And the strategy was to have a woman suddenly come forth, 36 years later,  accusing Judge Kavanaugh of attempted rape.

H/t Gateway Pundit and FOTM reader CSM

See also “Christine Ford’s letter has varying font styles and sizes

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
0
 

52 responses to “Audio evidence of Christine Ford’s political adviser plotting in July against SCOTUS nominee Kavanaugh

  1. Schedule the vote for Monday and STICK TO IT.

    Enough of this political charade!!!

     
  2. I’m beginning to despise these disgraceful, scheming women involved in leftist political activities. I don’t believe any of their lies. I wish they’d all stay home, bake cookies, and home school their kids. Oh, I forgot; they’re too stupid to teach their kids.

     
    • It all begins with faith. If one doesn’t have any, they can’t develop principles. Look at how many unprincipled losers they have. They will DO ANYTHING to get their way. That’s why Satanists are so successful in this world.

      “Do as thou wilt is the whole of the law”.

       
    • I agree with you completely! People who are willing to sell their souls in these instances are fit only to inhabit the nether regions of Hell. We have seen time and time again, the lengths to which those of the Deep State will go to knock off people of good will. I am outraged.

       
  3. The deal is that if he isn’t seated next week, he will not be allowed to participate in the Supreme Court’s next session. This is why Feinstien and crew timed it the way they did.

    By playing along they are playing right into their hands again, as usual. They need to quit worrying about what the leftists are going to say about them and do what they have the authority to do. They are going to get called names no matter what they do. Who cares?

    They could seat him today. They just need to do. But, you watch, I’ll bet then don’t, just like they won’t make them un-redact and release those seditious documents or fire Rosenstein. I mean the guy actually admits to suggesting that he wear a wire and record Trump and conspired with his cabinet to depose him.

    I guess if these scumbags can do this with impunity we’re toast.

     
    • That was how the old Hegelian Dialectics worked. The fake Democrat Republicans (RINO’s/Neocon,s) were controlled opposition. The Tea party & Trump cleared out most with one of their biggest scores knocking out Eric Cantor. I’m hoping that now that its Trump’s Republican Party, they won’t cave.

      “Sometime around the late 1950s, American conservatives picked up a hitch-hiker on the road to power who wound up hijacking their movement. The thuggish style of the left – with its organized smear campaigns, race-baiting, expulsions, and enforced ideological conformity – was imported to the Right via the neconservative influx”
      DO NEOCONS EXIST?
      https://www.antiwar.com/justin/j010303.html

       
      • Well, for me, I don’t do parties. I don’t do “left or right” (really). I DO know bullshit when I see it. Your comments about the Hegelian Dialectic is why I don’t do parties.

        I understand the dynamic and I understand the psycho-babble. Whatever label they like to affix is of no importance to me unless it is helpful in trying to describe what’s going on. Whenever someone sticks a label on something you can rest assured that they intend to use it to their advantage.

         
  4. It only takes 4 days at the absolute most to drive cross country with enough rest, 3 is sufficient.

    She had plenty of time to make the trip if she really felt it was important enough to do so. If you feel that something is that important to you, you do whatever you could to make such a thing happen!

     
    • It would be interesting to know if she’s flown in the past, not that it makes any difference. Let’s do an experiment. Why don’t you go find a judge, preferably a ranking one, and accuse him of sodomy. Then demand that he meet with you on your terms and put you up in a first-class hotel. Hey, if you have to, tell him you used to be a woman.

      Now, my guess is you’d be slapped with the lawsuit of your life. It wouldn’t take me too long if I were Kavanaugh. She’d better get her somebody more capable than Katzenjammer.

       
      • Aren’t there pictures of the slut at the woman’s March in DC? Are we to believe that she drove cross country to participate in that? Are her parents and siblings still living in Maryland? If so does she never see them or does she drive cross country to see them ? Not buying it?

         
    • Someone should be watching all of the airports around DC. I would not be surprised if she flies in under the cover of night on some Soros/DNC private jet to some out of the way airport on Wednesday and say she drove all of the way. Liars do things like that.

       
  5. Why and how with all that have been developing with this Ford woman accusations it is allowed to continue? Yes, she needs to talk but she cannot formulate an accusation she doesn’t remember the facts. Doesn’t the committee have enough to throw it all out, less allow “her” to dictate how it should be conducted? All this is unlawful! Have the laws lost all powers? This is all unbelievable to be happening in the United States of American. Where is “Justice for All?

     
    • THIRTY-SIX YEARS! You couldn’t get a DA anywhere (but California) to bring charges. The statute of limitations has LONG since expired. It doesn’t matter if she has evidence or not.

      You could walk into a police station with a mason jar full of semen from the alleged crime and they couldn’t do anything about it. Why would anyone allow this kangaroo court to take place during a nomination hearing?

      We talk of “identity politics”. This is a classic example. It isn’t based on belief, or evidence. It is simply a “creed” that they arbitrarily decide to chant. You either “belong” or you’re “deplorable”.

       
  6. By hiring this same POS political assassin should tell us all we need to know. I saw where Dan Bongino said Kavanaugh should sue the pants off all of those for destroying a good man without one iota of evidence. If she was damaged so badly, where is her police report. You read her history, chances are she didn’t even know where she was or whom she was with.
    People have screen shots of her FB page before she deleted everything where several months back she stated someone should come forward and accuse Gorsuch of rape. And now, here she is. It worked for destroying another Judge. If she stands by her claims, why delete?

     
    • The truth is, he couldn’t lose a lawsuit against her. She has no proof. It was too long ago. The burden is on her, not him.

       
  7. Feinstein, Schumer & Co. are up to their old tricks, and Ford is their latest foil. She is detestable.

    In the meantime, WHEN is Donald Trump going to go on the offensive FULL BORE??? Kavanaugh has already been investigated by the FBI, as per protocol of any SCOTUS nominee. When does Donald Trump come out CHARGING like a bull???

     
    • You’re a funny guy Steve. When is he going to fire Sessions and Rosenstein? When is he going to withhold the Israel funds until he gets his wall?

      He really needs to stop drawing attention to these things. If it’s President Rosenstein he should just say so. Every time he says something like “I don’t have an attorney general”, I cringe. Why is that. I’ll bet somebody could do something about that.

       
  8. Looks like Seidman’s been eating a lot of Whoppers with fries.

    The Left is going nuts at the idea of Trump strengthening the Supreme Court with yet another constitutionalist. Wait ’till Ginsburg goes comatose and Thomas decides this would be a good time to turn it over to a younger person.

    After the November red wave PRESIDENT Trump will be set to do some REAL swamp draining. There will also be some high level perp walks. … MAGA
    .

     
    • I’d LOVE to see that. She looks like she ate the packaging too. Must be a friend of Lena’s. Whoever is making these “strategic decisions” sucks at it. All the time wasted on this could be spent on scaring Ginsburg into early retirement.

       
      • Ruthie’s strength is ever so faltering I doubt she’ll continue and will leave her seat to another presidential nominee, that will likely be next year, whoever she/he is the nominee, the battle will be fierce and no comparison to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation, but rest assure that person will be confirmed too. The Supreme Court will then be the real Supreme Court for a very long time. May God grant me that request.

         
        • You said it. Somebody should start waking her to German martial music every time she falls asleep. We should already be thinking about the most absolutist constitutional judge we can find. Somebody like Scalia would do.

           
  9. The treachery knows no bounds. These things(people).. are disgusting.

     
  10. Feinstein, Seidmann, Katz…

    And they wonder why they are hated.

     
  11. What happened? I don’t know
    Where did it happen? I don’t know
    When did it happen? I don’t know
    Who was there? I’d don’t know
    How’d you get there? I don’t know
    How did you get home? I don’t know
    Did you tell anyone? No.

    These sleazy democRATS keep saying that if a woman makes an accusation of sexual assault by a male that “she must be believed”. In Ford’s case there are no details, no evidence whatsoever of this assault but she “must be believed just because she said so” Take the case of Jaunita Broaddrick and Gennifer Flowers. They have the date, time, the place and vivid details of exactly how they were raped by Bill Clinton. At the time lying, cheating, crooked Hillary and the hate-filled left-tard media, democRATS and crybaby liberals said that their accusations were not believable. Can we say major hypocrisy?

     
  12. The left is freaking out bc if Kavanaugh is confirmed they will loose the SC for a very long time. This is akin to death to them. They believe if they can postpone the vote until after the “blue wave” they can permanently keep him off the court for 2 years until the next “blue wave” in 2020 and when they elect their savior as POTUS. Then they will be picking the Judge(s)-they have to do this bc they cannot pass laws with the vote of the people liberal SCOTUS does it for them-that’s why they sue all the time for everything.
    These freaks have some pretty delusional big dreams and will stop at nothing to get this vote postponed. That is the objective-not the hearing.
    This is reason for all the shenanigans ms. ford and her team of lawyers are coming up with. Its a game of playing out the clock-it is so transparent except the dimwits on the left won’t say it, the “believe her” mantra as if its all about justice for her. It has nothing to do with her.
    It makes me sick that this POS can come up with this nonsense to attack this man and everybody jumps on the #metoo wagon oh the horror of it all… fercryinoutloud they were TEENAGERS – who hasn’t done this-that’s what teenagers do. Plus sexual assault definition was way different 36 years ago -which should be the standard looked at. She would have been laughed out of a courtroom back then.
    This woman has made a mountain out of a molehill with the lefty loons full support. It literally makes me want to rip their hair out.
    It needs to end. Repubs need to stop coddling her and CALL THE VOTE! on Monday as planned or Wed right after the stupid hearing. That trust me will have something come up to delay it moving forward. That vote has to occur before Friday.

     
  13. So Ford is a research psychologist? Has she been dipping into the medical cabinet? More than likely she’s bit off more than she can chew and realizes both she and her supporters are going to come out looking like total asses in this bizarre case of flinging poop. Any first year law student could take her testamony and turn it into the punch line of a bad joke.

     
  14. Well, the left has won another round! Grassley and the gutless Repubicans folded yet again. The left has won this one for sure. Prof Fraud is scheduled to testify on Thursday-AFTER the date when the votes (SJC and full Senate) can be held in time to seat Judge Kavanaugh for the opening of the SCOTUS session on Oct. 1. There’s NO WAY Judge Kavanaugh can be seated now, because the left ran out the clock. The Republicans had all aces and what do they do? They folded like a cheap beach chair!

    I said it before and I’ll say it again: I wish I COULD be a leftist, because they play to win! When does our side ever play to win? What have conservatives conserved, exactly? Hell, they couldn’t even save the boys’ and girls’ bathrooms!

    The left plays the long game; they’ve been at this (i.e. the subversion of America) for decades. Exhibut A is this stunt with Prof. Fraud; it has obviously been planned for a long time; they executed their plan well too, because it achieved its objective: to prevent Judge Kavanaugh from being seated on the SCOTUS. Exhibit B is the how the left changed our demographics. It doesn’t matter to the Democrats that they’ve lost white men, because, back in 1965, they made it possible to REPLACE their lost voters with new ones from Third World countries! Exhibit C is the silent coup against President Trump. Exhibit D is Antifa and BAMN; yes, by ANY means necessary, the left will achieve their aims; by hook or by crook, come hell or high water, the left WILL win. The left plays the long game; they play it well; and they play to WIN. Our side is fighting with 20oz. gloves, while the other side is hitting us with brass knuckles and worse.

    You know, I used to go to Monmouth Park when I lived near it. Yeah, I bet on the horses. I never lost money, either. You know why? Because I know how to read the odds and bet accordingly. Having said that, I will make the following prediction: the left will ultimately win-not only because the Bible says so (i.e. the ascension of the Antichrist, the ultimate leftist authoritarian) , but because I can read the tea leaves. The left is ruthless and relentless; they do whatever they have to do, and they do it as long as they have to do it in order to achieve their ends. In sports parlance, they just plain ‘want’ it more than we do. Therefore, the left will win in the end. Donald Trump, as much as I love the guy, is merely a speed bump to the inevitable.

     
  15. Better yet, tell her to KAOOCA’s!

     
  16. I do hope that if this proves to be a political stunt this woman is prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

     
    • Well Dixie, I doubt it. In fact, I doubt if Kavanaugh will sue her, although he has every right to. In fact, the Demon-rats have announced that no matter the outcome, they will not rest until they impeach him and remove him from the bench.

      So, unless someone decides to stand up to them and shut this down entirely, this is going to be the “new normal” for them.

       
      • Grassley and the spineless GOP are rolling over quite well tonight.

        I know it may not help, but contact Grassley and your state senators. Tell them to vote NOW and put an end to this freakin debacle. And that’s exactly what I told them to do in my emails: STAND UP and end this CHARADE!!

         
  17. Pingback: Expert Analysis of Christine Blasey Ford’s body language & handwriting - James Fetzer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *