Atheist loses lawsuit to remove ‘In God We Trust’ from U.S. currency

A piece of good news, at last, in the contemporary American wasteland.

Do you remember a man named Michael Newdow?

Newdow, 65, is the Californian atheist who’s been jamming the courts with lawsuits.

Newdow’s most recent lawsuit was to have “In God We Trust” removed from U.S. currency on the grounds that the motto is a government endorsement of religion and so violates the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment. Last year, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Newdow — the judges found that the motto on currency “comports with early understandings of the Establishment Clause” and did not coerce people into practicing a religion.

See DCG’s “Lawsuit demands US remove ‘In God We Trust’ from money“.

“In God We Trust” was first put on an American coin in 1864, and added to both coins and paper bills in 1955. A year after, in 1956, President Dwight Eisenhower signed a law making the phrase the national motto.

Leah Klett reports for Christian Post, citing Fox News, that on June 10, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected, without comment, Newdow’s appeal.

In 2013, Newdow had partnered with the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation to sue the U.S. Treasury over the motto on currency. In his petition to the Supreme Court, Nedow, a lawyer whose clients are other atheists, had argued that:

  • The government violated his clients’ “sincere religious belief” that there is no God and turned them into “political outsiders” by placing the phrase “In God We Trust” on their money.
  • The placement of “In God We Trust” on money “has real effects on real children” and subjects atheist children to the same sufferings  historically endured by black children as “second class citizens”.

In the words of Newdow’s petition, which refers to “God” as “G-d” — a Jewish practice:

Petitioners are atheists. As such, they fervidly disagree with the religious idea that people should trust in G-d. On the contrary, their sincere religious belief is that trusting in any G-d is misguided. Defendants have conditioned receipt of the important benefit of using the nation’s sole ‘legal tender’ upon conduct proscribed by Petitioners’ atheism (i.e., upon Petitioners’ personally bearing – and proselytizing – a religious message that is directly contrary to the central idea that underlies their religious belief system).

Unless this Court ends the flagrant governmental preference for belief in G-d (and the implicit concomitant denigration of Atheism), the organizations, adults and children bringing this case will spend the rest of their lives – as they have spent their lives so far – as secondclass citizens.

Mat Staver, founder and chairman of religious liberty law firm Liberty Counsel, praised the court’s rejection of Newdow’s petition: “Our national motto ‘In God We Trust’ has been on all U.S. currency for more than 60 years and it will remain there, despite ridiculous attempts by atheists to remove it.”

Newdow’s past litigation includes:

  • Several failed litigation challenges against the “under God” phrase in the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance. In 2004, after suing for the removal of “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance, his case was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. But the court did not decide on the merits of the case but instead said Newdow had no standing to sue. See my post, “‘Under God’ stays in Pledge of Allegiance“.
  • Attempts to stop prayers being read at the inauguration of Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush.
  • Attempts to prevent government leaders from saying the phrase “So help me God” in the 2009, 2013, and 2017 presidential inaugurations.

See also:

~Eowyn

Better than Drudge Report. Check out Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative frontpage founded by ex-military!

Please follow and like us:
error0
 

12
Leave a Reply

avatar
10 Comment authors
chemtrailssuckKarinGlenn47Ray CaneAlma Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Auntie Lulu
Guest
Auntie Lulu

This truly is “good news.” Unfortunately, we are inundated with bad news all the time, so it’s great to have good news. You would think that this goofball would give up, since he doesn’t get very far with his suits.

DCG
Admin

This guy should find another hobby. He doesn’t have a good track record (wins) as an attorney.

Lophatt
Member
Lophatt

I think the take away is that they cannot stand “diversity”. There is only ONE way to think, theirs. If they are truly stupid enough to be atheists, why is it necessary for them to enforce that on others?

This guy’s a loser.

Steven Broiles
Member

Dr. Michael Savage brought this to the public’s attention around 2003, if I recall correctly. Newdow is a loser, somewhat after the fashion of the late Madeleine Murray O’Hare, and deserves to be treated as such. The hidden problem with our National Motto is the identity of the “God” identified in the motto: To us Christians, we think that it is the God of the Bible that is identified. But to the Masons and other secret societies the God that is identified—at least to them—is Baphomet. Here is hoping that Newdow will not go away mad but just go away,… Read more »

Karin
Guest
Karin

This is my great [3x,s] grand father, a mighty man of GOD who was close friends with Abe Lincoln. I have personal letters from the two of them writing back and forth . In God We Trust is most certainly referring to the GOD of the bible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Pollock

William
Member
William

I have referred elsewhere to atheism as a belief in non-belief. That seems self-refuting; how is it possible to maintain a “sincere religious belief” in nothing? When we add materialism/naturalism to the equation, a non-belief in immateriality, a position that is demonstrably mathematically impossible, their situation becomes even more untenable – there is something, not nothing, the something began to exist, and everything that begins to exist must have a cause. The cause of course is God the creator. There is no other possibility. These people are seriously confused and they insist that we share in their confusion, their bleak… Read more »

Alma
Member
Alma

I have a bucket full of ……. for this clown! I think he is from Mars.

Ray Cane
Guest
Ray Cane

One ugly snot-nosed mofo, ain’t he? I guess LEftard men are like leftard women…..Satan never did have any good looking children… ALL UGLY AS HELL.

Let’s move to put GOD back in the classroom and watch this Khazarian KKKLAM have a massive stroke. How many children do you think he raped??

Ray Cane
Guest
Ray Cane

Who funds this idiot’s lawsuits?? They need to be unmasked and gone after.

Glenn47
Guest
Glenn47

This piece of crap deserves no serious respect. He used his own daughter years ago to attack our Pledge of Allegience. He has made it his life’s living to cram our courts with frivolous suits.

trackback

[…] Fellowship Of The Minds  […]

chemtrailssuck
Guest

What a total and complete butt wad he is.