Arm the Farmers, not the Government

Rate this post

Yes, once again we are being warned by the Russians, to beware of government tyranny. As a child of the “cold war” era, I am not used to this. But keep in mind, Russian farmers suffered terribly under Stalin, and they are seeing America about to make the same mistake. ~ TD


Department of Agriculture buying unknown amount of submachine guns and high-capacity magazines


The United States Department of Agriculture is probably one of the last federal agencies you’d expect to request a substantial amount, if any, of firearms, but that’s precisely what it did last week.

In a solicitation posted on the government’s Federal Business Opportunities website on May 7, the Agriculture Department requested an unknown number of submachine guns. The department also states it wants to get its hands on weapons with night sights in the front and the rear and magazines with a 30-round capacity.

The solicitation, which also calls for the submachine guns to be lightweight and feature slings, says:

“The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Inspector General, located in Washington, DC, pursuant to the authority of FAR Part 13, has a requirement for the commerical [sic] acquisition of submachine guns, .40 Cal. S&W, ambidextrous safety, semi-automatic or 2 shot burts [sic] trigger group, Tritium night sights for front and rear, rails for attachment of flashlight (front under fore grip) and scope (top rear), stock-collapsilbe [sic] or folding, magazine – 30 rd. capacity, sling, light weight, and oversized trigger guard for gloved operation.”

Exactly why the USDA wants or needs to acquire multiple submachine guns is unclear, as the solicitation does not go into much detail regarding the purpose. RT attempted to reach both of the individuals listed as contacts on the USDA solicitation to learn more about the request, but was unable to immediately obtain a response from either.

The request has captured the attention of many conservative, pro-gun websites, though, which have raised questions about it.

One possible explanation for the request could be that the weapons would be used by the law enforcement division of the United States Forest Service, which falls under the jurisdiction of the USDA. The Forest Service is not listed specifically in the text of the solicitation – again, nothing is mentioned that could be related to the ultimate purpose of the acquisition – causing some to fret over the possibility that the guns would be used elsewhere.

“[The USDA] will no doubt attempt to justify their purchase of military hardware by explaining that they conduct criminal investigations and may need to do armed raids,” wrote Bob Owens at the website Bearing Arms. “This is part of a trend to arm every branch of federal government, whether the individual agency has a legitimate need for a paramilitary force or not.”

There has been concern recently over the purchasing decisions of government agencies, particularly the Department for Homeland Security, which critics have claimed buys excessive amounts of ammunition. A report by the Government Accountability Office in January, however, dismissed such concern, saying ammunition purchases by DHS have actually gone down since 2009.

Meanwhile, earlier this week a journalist at WND made headlines for suggesting the State Department is shopping for large amounts of explosives and detonator devices. Solicitations for explosives were also posted on the FBO website, but when asked to comment on the requests an agency official laughed off the question, saying “I’m not sure what you’re looking for.”

This article can be found at


Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Arm the Farmers, not the Government

  1. I am not exactly sure what is going on, but I am sure something very nefarious is in the works. They are coming at us from all directions and sadly so many people are totally ignorant on anything.
    We have huge ammo purchases, threats of FEMA camps, false flags all over, Illegal land grabs and National Parks under the UN.
    Attacks on people with water in their property, attacks on small farmers, shutting down of water for crops, installing Smart Meters.
    Foreign troops, and I find out there are thousands of foreign truck drivers undercutting the American Trucker from making a living.
    We have the Chinese now owning hundreds of thousands of acres of our land and Reid has his hands in more than one deal in NV and the Bundy area.
    We have Common Core making brain dead students out of our children. And Commies and terrorist running rampant in OUR White House.
    Going after legal gun owners and EOs allowing free entry into our homes for food and ammo and supplies confiscation.
    Am I the only one thinking this is going to end badly?

  2. Ironic, isn’t it, that we would here about this so shortly after and during the escalating confrontation between the BML and Cliven Bundy. Things that make you “hmmm”.

  3. A dictatorship cannot function without armed killers to control the citizens.

  4. The only non-threatening reason I can see for this purchase is the burgeoning use of federal lands for clandestine marijuana farming. Many times these drug farms are guarded furiously by armed traffickers who will also use booby traps to protect their crops.

    It’s a real problem in California:
    “Forester Jere Melo was killed while investigating an illegal marijuana farm on private land, according to the Western Farm Press, an American City & County sister brand. The publication also noted that the Fresno County Farm Bureau pointed to many other violent incidents in recent months related to marijuana farms, emphasizing the violence and crime drug farms bring to a community. Some illegal marijuana farms use trip wires, motion detectors and guards with heavy-duty firearms to protect their crops, according to the Wall Street Journal.”

    One farmer said that his part of the state is like a war zone because of this trade. Marijuana is the top cash crop in 12 states and one of the top three in the entire country. People are getting killed over this stuff.

  5. I agree w/much noted so far, i.e, arming foresters: maybe, b/c there’s HUGE problems in SW USA, esp states bordering Mexico. My family NEVER uses public/picnic/camping land in Nat’l Forests nr us. We’re afraid of getting killed by one side or the other (OTOH…drug busts are the only place I’ve ever seen THESE sorts of weapons—shown above—- used & it was by ATF agents, not foresters…we got caught amid an international bust when agents swooped into a shopping center parking lot while we were inside a store getting ready to exit…a scary welcome to Calfornia…I’d lived here 6 mos. at the time…).

    BUT what doesn’t make sense is that such trained agents don’t work for the Dept. of Agriculture–nor to my knowledge, are they associated w/other Federal agencies who work under their auspices. …other than inspectors …Do they carry semi-automatic weapons??? Maybe a weapon, like the Park Service…but semi-automatic? I doubt it. When was the last time you heard of Dept of Agriculture employees being sent off to “camp” to train with these weapons? Never! The only thing I can think of is this: Remember when, fresh off the podium/oath of office, Obama spewed forth the “need” for a Nationalized Police Force?????? Well shades of the Third Reich, I don’t think he could sell it….even to his fans (maybe esp. to a certain population of his fans)…BUT…he could maybe arm every gov’t department AS THOUGH … order to “cover” the nation with a de facto “Nationalized Police Force?????” For sure, this could include BLM, Dept. of Ag, Dept of Justice Dept…..Whatever….Also, has anyone posted here abt the gov’t buying up huge amts of ammo of all kinds? They’ve been doing this for a few years. This could also be Obama’s de facto “gun control.” If you can’t beat ’em….just buy up all the weapons and ammo and destroy them (or sell them to Mexico)—but they’d have to do it “legally” on the books & not allow the public to get a whiff of what they were doing with them. They just couldn’t have a giant book burning—OOPS! I mean…..ammo & weapon dump, within view of the public …some of whom would surly bust out their copies of the Constitution, and also MAYBE ask where this was penciled in on the so-called budget… know, the one paid for by tax-payers & appropriated/released by Congress ONLY. Just some thoughts about this strange development.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.