Arizona Thwarts Obama 2012 Reëlection

Rate this post

Yesterday, April 19, the House of Arizona’s state legislature voted 31-22 in favor of adding to a bill a provision requiring U.S. presidential candidates who want to appear on the ballot in Arizona to submit documents proving they meet the constitutional requirements to be president.
This means that Obama will have to show his original birth certificate if he hopes to be on the state’s ballot when if  he runs for reëlection in 2012.
Recall that Obama told ABC’s Diane Sawyer on January 25, 2010, that he’d “rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president.” I think Obama already knows he could not fool America on the birth eligibility issue a second time. I just hope we can salvage our country after 2012.
The amendment to Arizona’s Senate Bill 1024 was introduced by Republican Rep. Judy Burges. It would require the Arizona secretary of state to verify a presidential candidate’s birth certificate before the candidate’s name is allowed on a ballot in Arizona.
The measure still faces a formal vote.
Mesa Republican Rep. Cecil Ash says he has no reason to doubt Obama’s citizenship but supports the measure because it could help end doubt.
Phoenix Democratic Rep. Kyrsten Sinema says the bill is one of several measures that are making Arizona “the laughing stalk [sic] of the nation.” Sinema calls the bill ”a waste of taxpayers time when the legislature should be working to fix more important issues like the fact that it eliminated KidsCare, which forfeits all federal health care dollars for kids and seniors in Arizona.”
So Ms. Sinema is saying that federal dollars for kids are more important than the Constitution? Typical left-wing socialist crap.
H/t my ol’ friend Sol!

Please follow and like us:

8 responses to “Arizona Thwarts Obama 2012 Reëlection

  1. “rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president.”
    Um, looks more like he’s going to end up being a one-term adominable prez…

  2. If America rises up and demands this fraud’s impeachment come January, he will be gone long before November of 2012.
    I know that comes across as being a little “out there,” but I am of the considered belief that it may just be the only hope we have.

    Correction: that should read “2 STUPID RESPONSES SO FAR”. Frigging racists!

    • And you, MuddleDweller, are most unimaginative. Your muddled mind is so limited in grey cells and efficient synapses that you cannot imagine over half of American voters now disapprove of Obama not because of his bi-race, but BECAUSE OF HIS POLICIES AND HIS REFUSAL TO SHOW US HIS ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
      You of the Left are reduced to only one note to play in your gamebook. Your standard default-mode of accusations of racism are getting tiresome and just plain b-o-r-i-n-g.
      Come back when you have something intelligent to say.

  4. Comrade MiddleDweller,
    Have you no intellectual argument to offer in defense of the Comrade Chairman and his nation-destroying policies?
    Then again, communism is rather difficult to defend.
    In fact, I’d say damn near impossible.
    My guess is you cannot wipe your own ass without some form of government assistance.
    Sucks to be you, I guess.

  5. Eowyn,
    MiddleDumbass called us all “racists,” which I doubt he, she, or it, could accurately define at gunpoint.
    Does this mean we who love freedom and liberty should dive under the nearest rock and never be heard from again?

  6. Ahhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!you illegal Sonofa*&^%$! RESIGN! How can an illegal give illegals amnesty?????????? You can’t!!! Middle Dumb Ass-do your homework,or maybe the Punk will do it for you redistribute the homework! LOL LOL LOLO L-

    • “how can an illegal give illegals amnesty?”
      Impeccable logic, tina!
      Answer: “Only when Congress and the Courts shirk their duty by looking the other way.”


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.