Application for 'March For Our Lives' permit was made months before Parkland school shooting

Rate this post

On March 24, 2018, one month and ten days after the February 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, student-led pro-gun control “March For Our Lives” demonstrations took place across America, including in Washington, D.C.
The word “Our” in March For Our Lives refers to students.
From Wikipedia:

March For Our Lives was a student-led demonstration in support of tighter gun control that took place on March 24, 2018, in Washington, D.C., with over 800 sibling events throughout the United States and around the world. Student organizers from Never Again MSD planned the march in collaboration with the nonprofit organization Everytown for Gun Safety. The event followed the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, which was described by many media outlets as a possible tipping point for gun control legislation.

Never Again MSD (MSD refers to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School) is a group started on social media as a movement “For survivors of the Stoneman Douglas Shooting, by survivors of the Stoneman Douglas Shooting” using the hashtag #NeverAgain.
The MSD student survivors who formed Never Again MSD include the now-famous David Hogg, Emma Gonzalez, and Cameron Kasky.

Public demonstrations, especially those that are large-scale like March For Our Lives, require a permit from the police department of the city in which the demonstration will take place.
A source of European researcher Ole Dammegard contacted the Metropolitan D.C. Police Department concerning the permit for the March For Our Lives demonstration in Washington, D.C.
Dammegard’s source received the following email from Officer Scott C. Earhardt of the Homeland Security Bureau of the Metropolitan Police Department and forwarded it to Dammegard:

Good morning,
In reference to your inquiry concerning the March For Our Lives Demonstration, here in the District of Columbia on March 24, 2018. MPD received a permit application several months prior to the actual event, and there was several months of planning for this large event.
If your are requesting additional information reference this event, please follow the below steps to file your Freedom of Information Act request:
If your have any additional question sor concerns, please feel free in contacting me directly.
Officer Scott C. Earhardt, Badge No. 2372
Homeland Security Bureau
Special Operations Division
Planning and Logistics
Metropolitan Police Department
2850 New York Ave., N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20002
202-671-6529 (Office)
202-671-6522 (Planning)
202-671-6511 (Station)

Below is a screenshot of the email (source: Professor James Fetzer):

According to the PDF document, Metropolitan Police Department, Washington.D.C., Scott Earhardt indeed is a detective there. Here’s a screenshot I took from page 6 of the 65-page document:
Here are some facts:

  1. The shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas (MSD) High School occurred on February 14, 2018.
  2. A day after the shooting, on February 15, 2018, MSD students formed the group, Never Again MSD.
  3. On March 24, 2018, March For Our Lives demonstrations took place in Washington, D.C. (and other cities).
  4. Among the organizers of March For Our Lives is Never Again MSD, which had not existed before February 15.
  5. The D.C. Metropolitan Police Department received a permit application for March For Our Lives demonstration “several months prior to the actual event”.


  1. How can Never Again MSD apply for a permit “several months” BEFORE the group had even been formed?
  2. How can an application be made for a permit for a “March For Our Lives” demonstration “several months” BEFORE the Parkland MSD school shooting that galvanized MSD students to form the Never Again MSD group that organized the demonstration?

See also:

UPDATE (March 31, 2018):

There are claims that the email from Officer Earhardt is bogus, and that there’s a permit application for March For Our Lives in D.C. which is dated February 20, 2018, but which is an application to the National Park Service, not Metro PD. See “The curious ever-changing dates of March For Our Lives permit application“.
I, therefore, asked Professor James Fetzer for the original Earhardt email. Fetzer had obtained the screenshot of the email from Ole Dammegard, whose friend was the person who originally contacted Officer Earhardt about the permit.
I just received an email from Mr. Dammegard, with an attachment of the original Earhardt email, indicating the date on which the email was sent to Dammegard’s friend who, understandably, prefers to remain anonymous.
email from MPD Officer Scott Earhardt
I find the above email from Officer Earhardt to be credible. I also have confidence in the integrity of Professor Fetzer and Mr. Dammegard, neither of whom profits from counterfeiting the email — which is something we can’t say about those people who instigate false-flag mass-shooting incidents like Parkland.
In the meantime, Professor Fetzer had placed a phone call to Officer Earhardt to confirm the latter’s email. When we hear from Officer Earhardt, I will update this post with that information.

Update (April 5, 2018):

Officer Earhardt has given 4 different dates for when Metro PD received the permit application. See “The curious ever-changing dates of March For Our Lives permit application“.

Please follow and like us:

0 responses to “Application for 'March For Our Lives' permit was made months before Parkland school shooting

  1. Very good Doc you’re on it every way you can be. I did see where on the Blaze they were showing how sora$$ funded it through planned parenthood with 264 million and seems all the other outlets of satan jumped in to help out as well. Very good article Doc you’re the man. And thank you for my edit you keep me straight. ☻

        • Thank you, Brian, for your hard work and dogged perseverance in searching for the truth.

          • What’s the deal with this google search link? I just the little circle going round & round:
            Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency –
            Jan 7, 2018 – The District of Columbia Prepares for the March For Our Lives Rally. 16. JAN. DC Snow Team to Treat Roads Ahead of Wednesday Morning Commute, Will Activate Cold Emergency Plan. To prepare for overnight snow, the DC Snow Team will deploy more than 200 trucks at 7 pm. 7. JAN. DC Snow Team to …
            ‎Homeland Security Commission · ‎Meet the Director · ‎Who We Are · ‎What We Do

          • omnipresentelanvitalhuman

            Thank you, All of us already know the truth. You Dr. Eowyn, David Hogg, the FBI, everyone that contributes to this blog, etc. all know that what we are led to believe at this event along with many others is bullshit. I cannot begin to describe how wrong, angry, disrespectful, insulting , etc this makes me. Too many words, so I’ll just say F%@ed up and that is a understatement. I’m sure you’re “picking up what I’m throwing down” Everything on this blog from it’;stories, opinions, data, both true and debunked along with a a couple of other web pages that I frequent help me deal with that frustration(frustration being an understatement).. To be perfectly blunt “It keeps me from slapping the shit out of somebody, or worse”. Being a tax payer, it’s kind of like we paid them to allow the shooting to happen, we pay them to lie to us, we pay them to make it hard for us to find the truth,etc. Being a tax payer, one way or another we are paying for our grief and we are supposed to accept it with a smile. It’s like giving a person 5 bucks to punch you in the face and then saying thank you after your nose is broken. Enough of that. As far as my last post with the link to the event planning. Be sure to see the part where it says when a permit needs to be submitted prior to an event being permitted. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAYOR’S SPECIAL EVENTS TASK GROUP
            – Page | 5
            Special Events Planning Guide
            Planning Requirements Presentation Process
            The MSETG meets to review presentations of proposed events the second and fourth Monday of each month, except on government holidays. The organizers of proposed special events are required to present event proposals to the MSETG and receive the concurrence of the group prior to the issuance of permits or licenses by the permit-granting agencies. It should be noted that the applicable permit-granting agencies have the final authority for establishing and ensuring compliance with requirements relative to any activities under their respective jurisdictional authority. Presentation requests in the form of a Letter of Intent (LOI) must be received no less than ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180) DAYS prior to the date of the event and are processed up to one year prior to the proposed date of the event.
            Does not matter if the story is true. This shows all we need to know. All a person has to do is read. Unless there is something I am missing?
            Brian A Humphrey

            • “Presentation requests in the form of a Letter of Intent (LOI) must be received no less than ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180) DAYS prior to the date of the event and are processed up to one year prior to the proposed date of the event.”
              Wow. Thank you for this, Brian. I’ll get a post up on this.
              In the meantime, hang in there. There are many, many Americans who are on to this, and share your frustration. We will just Keep on Truckin’. There is no other option!

        • Unfortunately, the email was FAKE. I wish is was real, but it appears to be a ploy to make us look like jackasses. “March For Our Lives FAKE NEWS”

          • Show us the EVIDENCE that the email is fake.
            By the way, how do you know that the purported permit shown in the video isn’t fake?

          • So I posted a rebuttal to “Nathan” explaining why he had run two questions together and had missed the boat–so he moved my comment down below ones posted 20 and 21 hours earlier to hide it! Some piece of work! Why am I not surprised? Your idol has feet of clay. He can dish it out but he can’t take it. Surprise! Surpriser!

          • Stephen T. McCarthy

            Sorry, but that video host has too little personality in his presentation and too much soy in his diet.
            I thought being a host of a program required personality, or at least an appealing voice and captivating speaking style. This Millennial has absolutely nothing going for him. Probably not even verifiable facts.
            Get a REAL job, boy!
            ~ D-FensDogG
            Ferret-Faced Fascist Friends

        • That’s quite a guide. It is amazing that simple high schoolers were able to negotiate all of the requirements, including the briefing required for the event. Of course, judging from the listed “contributors” there was plenty of money available to hire professional help.
          From what I read the absolute minimum would be 30 days. For an event of this size and complexity I would think many more. Of course, doing the bosses’ work can always help expedite legal issues that only pertain to lowly eaters.
          While I have no way to prove this my guess is that all of this was already firmly in place LONG before the drill, er…, event. After all, the goal is in justifying the proposed action. Legislation must be prepared and be ready to go if the pressure and timing are to come together as planned.
          These and similar events will continue until they have completely enslaved us. I’ve watched them incrementally destroying the country for decades. I don’t know how much longer we have.

  2. awesome find Dr. Eowyn and awesome questions!
    truth always comes to Light

  3. Liberals, gun cntrol, lies, socialism, communism, more lies, the eroding of values in America and all over the world, even more lies, red flag events, the deep state, the David Pigs of this world, sorry, Hogs, aka, more lies, more useful idiots – what’s new? Lock and load, law abiding citizens, the fight is coming and we the people will be called to defend this Republic, against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

  4. Has anyone made the FOIA request to find out exactly who made the application for the March and exactly when?

  5. I linked the screen shot and someone i know just tweeted cnn. Hope you dont mind

  6. Wow ! Thanks for this !

  7. More importantly. How can we know when permits for these libatardfests are applied for so that we can watch for these false flags. The best offense is a good defense. They’ll have to be more careful. Already they’re sloppy at best.

    • They can afford to be as sloppy as they are since the main gun grabbers are themselves the media that fools in America, Europe, Canada, and Australia rely on to expose fake news and tell it to them straight. I don’t watch enough Fox News to generalize, but I get the impression they always run with the official narrative whether it’s a false flag with real casualties or a second-rate theatrical hoax using crisis actors.
      Fox’ effective corroboration of the official bullsh*t goes a long way in subtlety undermining the Second Amendment, just as their silence on Building 7 and the likely missile strike on the Pentagon (etc) has enabled the blood sacrifice of thousands of our brave young soldiers and the squandering of $5.6 trillion desperately needed here at home, and all to serve Israel’s genocidal agenda in the ME. Am I mistaken, or did I read that Israelis in Israel are demanding stringent gun control laws here in the US?

    • Why aren’t the cops arresting them then ??? Premeditated and planned terrorist attack followed by permit allowance is illegal.. oh but wait this proves the cops were in on it huh? They can’t arrest themselves can they?

  8. Awesome work as always! Keep ’em coming!

  9. Dr Eowyn . . . God Bless you for being like a dog with a bone . . . you just do not give up! That is excellent news for all of us. I have known in my very soul that this was a put-up job. I have no doubt that as the days roll on, there will be more and more revelations. Personally, I am just dying to have Mr Piglet ‘s true character to be spread far and wide, and for him to be named the fraud that he is.

  10. Whoa, excellent catch there Dr. You confirmed what so many knew deep in their bones.
    Now we have the man child Hogg as the actual cyber bully. He cries about being rejected from several colleges, then shouts foul when someone comments. Making demands on sponsors and disrupting the pattern of business. I have sent emails to some of those we do business with for their folding of this punks demands. His demands will cost people jobs, he must be stopped. His demands have made it very clear, this was planned way ahead of time to disrupt Capitalism.
    Common sense tells us there is no way a bunch of hysterical school kids planned this out to a T including transportation for thousands in a few days.
    His video he claims to have made during the shooting does not show anyone in distress in the background.
    I truly hate those trying to destroy this country.
    Thanks for your hard work and keep them coming.

    • Glenn47 . . . . Congratulations! I support you in every single point you made. I must confess, that I also . . . “truly hate those trying to destroy this country.” Unfortunately, it is up to each one of us to be vigilant in every aspect we can to see that evil people do not succeed.

  11. You realise there have been more than that one school shooting in the USA, right? It was organised long before hand, and as that was the most recent shooting the kids were put front and centre to give it a recent face to put to the movement.
    Tinfoil hats off, folks.

  12. Yes. And I am sure that Hogg’s father, an active FBI agent, specialized in “crisis situations” and that his mother’s being an employee of CNN, are mere coincidences! Not!
    We the People SHALL NOT BE GASLIGHTED!!!
    AND MAKE NO MISTAKE: The real face of hatred, hiding behind the animated moral corpses we see on television, is the face of hatred of the TALMUD: It is a face of hatred of the “common herd,” the common man, expressing its demand that we disarm ourselves, in order to facilitate our own genocide! I NEVER WANT TO BE LECTURED ON THE HOLOCAUST (which I believe really happened, and was an attack upon Jesus Christ) AGAIN.

  13. Stephen T. McCarthy

    Well, if anyone still had any doubts about the False Flag nature of this event, that should certainly sweep them away. There were already a gadzillion holes in the “official narrative”, so anyone with even just two brain cells to rub together should have known that this event was another one sponsored by “Uncle Scam”.
    But the date of the permit application for a march certainly puts a final nail in the coffin of this “story”, as far as I’m concerned!
    ~ D-FensDogG
    Ferret-Faced Fascist Friends

  14. This is precisely the type of investigative work that gets results. Great job! I wonder how they explain this. It takes a lot of leg work to put together a scam like this. All the coordination and hype doesn’t just happen.
    That means a significant number of people knew about this before it happened. They must feel very strongly about this issue to take time away from their valuable psychic hotlines to participate.

  15. Here’s Piglet with the next best thing to Barry Obongo. Anybody think this event “just happened”?

  16. Would be interesting to see if online bullying occured prior to tragic event…..?

  17. I’m not a big believer in psychology, but here is an excellent article about how to know if you are being gaslighted. I believe that is exactly what is being done to us, and these fake tragedies match perfectly to the list of 11 warning signs of gaslighting.

    • That may be true, but it doesn’t make any difference. It is just another form of manipulation. So, ask yourself, what are they after? Do you want to give it to them? If not, don’t.
      I don’t care what they say or do. I have no control over that. Anyone that expends a lot of energy trying to get me to agree with them is highly suspect. Why would they care?
      There are a lot of weak people that this tactic might work on. Primarily those are people who think they need the approval of others. While I know that its nice to have that, it isn’t necessary. Rely on yourself, not the opinion of others, real or imaginary.

  18. Where is the email Dammegard sent?
    I don’t see a date on the email from the D.C. officer.
    I don’t see any mention of this on Dammegard’s website, his YT channel. or channel.

  19. Another JEWEL from FOTM & Dr. E! Thank you for keeping us informed. You guys/gals always do excellent Sleuth work exposing these scams!
    I also like how you list ALL your prior articles/links under each post re whichever scam. That is great for newbies* we want to send in your direction.
    *My brother, who has been coming to visit yearly since 2013 after his wife’s death, gets an earful of “real news” at every visit. He was 95% “asleep” previously (though not a Leftie nor Rightie, just Non-Political). His biggest disbelief has been that the ENTIRE MEDIA (+ govts., police depts., search engines, etc.) could be full of deception, false flags, hoaxes/scams, censorship, etc., & nobody squeals. (I said, They do squeal, whistleblowers, etc., but you have to be “plugged in” to hear about it.) He replied early on, “Nope Nope Nope” shaking his head back & forth to emphasize that: No Way Could That Be True.
    He was in town recently again so we discussed Parkland & I also told him re the Sandy Hoax book that Amazon banned but is now online free as an ebook. He said repeatedly thereafter: “I want to see that. I’m going to look into that. I really want to read that,” etc. So I sent the link to his home addy before he even left town, plus FOTM’s SHES article w/all your prior articles/links below it. His first week back home (recent), he brought it up again via email saying he still wants to read the SH ebook. So I’ll let you know when I hear something. Hopefully his mind won’t be blown too painfully. 🙂
    FWIW, about 11-12 hours after your above Parkland post, I tried to access the Project Camelot site/link via google, bing, & duckduckgo, & all three gave the same message: “Error Establishing Database Connection.” Maybe Camelot is merely updating their site, or too many people at once are trying to access it, or are the bad guys messing with their site(?)
    I don’t think it’s my ISP as I can access everything else. Hopefully, it’s just a temporary glitch, whatever it is. It might be resolved before I finish this long commernt!

  20. Talk about being “Gasslighted!” stevenbroiles, you called it.
    And Dr. Eowyn, thank you for daring to touch this radioactive and very dangerous subject. Frankly, I can’t even look at David Pigg, and not see the violent hatred of the puppeteers. They are desperate and making increasingly outrageous attacks.
    So how do we keep our confidence up in such dark times? Trust the real Commander in Chief, who said, “In this world you will have trouble, but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world.”

  21. I found this video detailing the 13 active shooter drills planned for the Broward school district, detailing the fake blood and student actors, etc.

  22. Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:
    Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommnsents.
    As usual, was the shooting planned since they planned for the D.C. march in advance?

  23. Quote the purported email received by Dammgard or Fetzer:
    “MPD received a permit application several months prior to the actual event, and there was several months of planning for this large event.”
    Here is info about the prior permit (by a different group from a local school)
    Here is a March 13th WaPo article which says the two permits with the Park Service were granted
    and it names the sources.
    Notice how the subject email, the one which this officer was replying to,
    is not published. It is impossible to tell for sure what the officer was talking about
    without this context. The missing context (original question replied to) is probably
    missing because he did not want to show what he really asked about, namely,
    the prior permit that was planned in advance (the talent show). This other permit
    was redacted by the group so that the March for Our Lives event could take place.

    • Early this morning, I emailed Jim Fetzer, the source of the email from Officer Scott Earhardt, to forward me the original email, instead of a screenshot. My understanding is that Fetzer’s source is European political researcher Ole Dammegard.
      Will keep you all posted.

  24. Ole Dammegard does terrific work, as does Jim Fetzer, but Fetzer’s voice just grates on me, so I can tolerate him in small doses.
    The fact that groups like this were organized before the tragedy, is just like the Fakebook pages for Sandy Hoax being setup before that occured as well, shows that this is Standard Operating Procedure for the behind-the-scenes group(s) that fund the rallies/protests.
    Unless there are insider moles in these groups, it’s next to impossible to get the word out before the next tragedy; unfortunately, the tragedy/false flag has to happen before we eventually find out about these things.

  25. The AFT is taking comments until June 27 on the DOJ banning bump stocks. Please send in your comment; as we all know the goal of the communists is to confiscate/ban guns, and this is a start.

  26. Please scroll up to the end of this post for my important Update.

  27. So, it took about 30 seconds to find the actual FOIA-requested original application. Here it is, on the NPS’ website. Not a screenshot of an email with odd grammatical errors and weird vagueries (why say “several months ago” instead of an actual date? If it’s because a FOIA needs to be filed, then he couldn’t have legally said the timeframe at all), supposedly written by an officer of whom the only proof we have of working there is from 2 years ago.
    It was filed on February 20th. The FOIA was filed awhile ago. I googled “march for our lives application foia”, and it was on the first page.
    I do have a question about all this – you said you were forwarded the email where the original email was “attached” – so, was it just an image? I’m trying to figure out if the officer is spreading disinformation, or if he is being impostered without his knowledge.

    • The attachment is of an image of the email.

    • Since you doubt the authenticity of the email from Officer Earhardt, why are you so sure that the permit application is authentic? The form asks for 4 names, at least one of whom must be listed as in charge of the activity (the march), but the space is blank, as in all of page 3. The form, therefore, is incomplete, and is inadmissable.

      • Because one is hosted on government servers, the other is a .jpg that could have been made by ANYONE. The application is at the very very least authentic in that it is the permit the government says was sent in. We know this because it is on government servers. We have literally zero proof that the email is government-sanctioned, since it’s just a screenshot floating around.
        Now, does this prove that the application hosted by the government is the one that was submitted by MFOL? Not necessarily. I believe it is, but it is possible to see some wiggle room there. But you cannot dispute that a file hosted on government servers has more authenticity of being endorsed by the government than a .jpg supplied by someone not even in the country.
        As for the missing stuff on the forms – that’s odd! But it is the one piece of the form that is closest to seeming voluntary (since Marshals are not a required part, depending on location and size). But if it IS somehow a faked copy on the servers of a federal government where the President’s party is in controller of Legislative and Executive branches… Why skip a section? Why upload a fake that’s invalid?
        While it’s a tool that is overused, I do think Occam’s Razor applies here: Which is more likely? That the application is real, and the people submitting it got some special dispensation to submit names of volunteer wranglers later, since this was a very rushed, time sensitive affair? Or that the real permit was submitted months ago, a fake one was created and replaced for the FOIA, every single person at the NPS is either in on it or completely unaware of a massive discrepancy in the biggest national story sitting right on their servers, and somehow a single Detective/Officer with a sometimes shaky grasp on grammar knows this absolutely bombshell fact and never thought to alert any form of stateside media, but did tell some European dude, but also for some reason urged him to file a FOIA that had already been filed, knowing that the permit application that would be received would be contradictory to what he just said?
        To believe the latter seems to require intellectual dishonesty or a level of imagination that surpasses even mine. It’s especially disappointing that this hasn’t changed the post at all – you still claim the permit being filled months ago as a “fact”, when it is anything but. You also say there are “claims” of there being a permit posted on the 20th of February – these aren’t claims. That’s an actual fact. I linked you right to it. And at the very least it has the same level of credibility as the .jpg you cite as the source for your most important fact, if not more so since it is actually, you know, endorsed by the government.
        Like I said, if you really want to, you can find reasons why the hosted application could be a fake. But it is the one the government says it received, and to not include it in your post at all is extremely disingenuous.

        • Odd. Occam only applies when alternative theories provide equally good explanations of the evidence but one does so more economically (with fewer assumptions). The email appears to be authentic, but the permit on the server does not. Two questions tend to be conflated here: (1) Did the march require months of prior planning? and (2) Does the email send to Ole by his contact prove when it was done? The answer to (1) is “Yes!”, which ought to be OBVIOUS. An event of this magnitude has to have been planned months and months in advance. The answer to (2) is, “Not all by itself”, but none of us has taken for granted that it does. I have called the number and it’s legit. I have submitted my own FOIA request about the permit(s), where there may have been more than one. You can only take the server document as all there is to the story by ignoring that no event of this kind could possibly have been organized in the brief time span that that document implies. But it may be one among several that had to be obtained in this case, which we are going to have to investigate further. At this point, however, the email appears to be authentic and the permit on the server does not. But Occam doesn’t figure in unless you ignore what we know as common knowledge about large scale, mass demonstrations.

  28. Shirley Rohweller

    And it appears that the permit for the march was submitted before the shooting!.
    I found this post interesting so I copied and pasted it.

  29. I have no concerns about Dr. Fetzer or Ole Dammegard, I am, however, and little surprised by the content of the email. I retired from federal service several years ago but I did work with FOIA requests quite often.
    It would be highly unusual for someone to comment (editorialize) about a permit when all that was being asked was a copy of the document. Further, “we’re here to help” or similar signature messages are usually prohibited.
    I can think of a few more but I’ll stop there. The way this game is played one either gets what one requests, a redacted version, or a denial. Anything but a complete, unredacted copy must get a legal review. The language in the response must conform to the exceptions in the law.
    Often documents received are later used in legal proceedings. For that reason, agencies do not allow their “officers” or employees to discuss the requests without legal input.
    While I have no doubt that they could have (and probably did) applied in advance of the operation, having a “contact person” comment on the request is extremely unusual and would normally get someone in trouble if it became known.
    Those are just my initial impressions. Could they have simply gotten hold of a person who did not pay attention to protocol or didn’t know of it? Sure, but it’s unlikely.

  30. Pingback: Application for ‘March For Our Lives’ permit was made months before Parkland school shooting – Fellowship of the Minds – Defending Sanity in the Uppity Down World

  31. Thank you…..the rabbit hole gets deeper ever day…

  32. I’m a little surprised to find a “Bureau of Homeland Security” in a metropolitan police department. The “agency”, “Department of Homeland Security” is federal.
    I certainly do not know much about metropolitan or certain state laws. But, generally speaking, they follow federal laws.
    Here I see to issues. One, did they apply in advance of the operation for a permit to march?, and (2), is this a real email from a responsible party?
    While I suppose it is possible since they all work for the same boss to expedite the permit for the march, I doubt they did that. They planned this well in advance, including all the manufactured signs and symbols associated with it and the air time on TV.
    So, regardless what is found, it may be interesting but you can bet your bippy they planned this long before they “went live”.
    Now, speaking of FOIA requests, I will assume that the local law and regulations are very similar to the federal ones. There are very specific circumstances that allow for redactions and/or refusals. To avoid potential liability agencies try to abide by the rules.
    While an agency may guess why the request is being made, it technically is none of their business and should not influence the outcome of the request. If an official doesn’t want to find themselves on a witness stand explaining what she or he meant by some statement made in the process, it is wise not to make unnecessary statements.
    Email, in government circles, is thought (correctly) to live forever. Anything written in an email can, and will, be read by others in discovery.

  33. You all trust Fetzer? I sure don’t. Do a little more research on Fetzer and you’ll see what I mean. He’s controlling the opposition. You are free to believe he’s a good guy, but I don’t trust him. And by the way, next time someone you know cries for more gun control, ask one question: “Who’s going to enforce gun control on our government, the biggest purveryor of weapons on the face of the planet?”

    • You made a very serious accusation. What’s your evidence?
      Yeah, Fetzer is so “controlled opposition” that the book he edited, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, was banned from Amazon.
      Here’s a free PDF of the book:
      I’d been exchanging back-and-forth email with Fetzer all day yesterday, and he’s responded to my requests. He has left a voice mail for Officer Earhardt and is following up with a FOIA request for the permit.

      • Thanks. Loopy. Since 1992, I have been devoting myself to exposing government complicity and corruption in JFK, 9/11, Wellstone, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Las Vegas and (now) Parkland! I am a former Marine Corps officer and Distinguished McKnight University Professor Emeritus with many honors and awards to my credit. My research from JFK on has been collaborative where I bring together the best experts on different aspects of each of these cases. What could possibly justify doubting my integrity or the integrity of my research associates? Are the many contributors to my books also suspect because we agree about the truth in these cases? What’s the probability that the thirteen contributors to NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK are mistaken about the school having been closed and the deaths faked? No one should take for granted any conclusions without evaluating the evidence for themselves but concerns about me are so massively contradicted by the available evidence–public and accessible–including a dozen books on the subjects (with more in the works), literally thousands of interviews and hundreds of videos–that they reflect a stunning degree of detachment from reality.

  34. Patriots and friends, Can someone tell me that the Criminal left and the Criminals in our government are not working in partnership to destroy our Country and our President. If you recall a post of mine about a week ago, on what points to the governments conspiracy and involvement in what in my opinion, directly links them to every explosive and murder related scandals for Nine plus years. What Say you America ?
    Better yet link the events and the lies, surrounding each event. ???

  35. Interesting, however, I do know e-mail can be “spoofed” so to speak. The thing to look at is the header information which would betray tampering, it might be prudent to ask either fetzer or dammegard to post the header info of the e-mail, with reasonable protection of the leaker, that is.
    Just something to be thorough, incidentally, one wonders, what ever happens to the “weather underground”? All these shootings etc. and what things are being strived for all seem to be the sort of garbage that bunch would push, were they really axed or are we still seeing them acting even now?
    It would be nice if a mapping of who is pushing what could be done to find just who the filth are that are pushing this malarkey, it might also help expose their end goals. I’m relatively certain this isn’t all solely soros’ doing, whether he is involved or not, he does seem to have some ties and stake in it, but I do doubt he is the sole, or even the head, agenda-pusher.

  36. While interesting, there is a possibility that the alleged email from the Homeland Security Officer is bogus, based on several reasons….first being that police detectives usually address themselves as Detective, not Officer. Second reason might be that if Detective Earhardt had actually researched the timeline he most likely would have given the actual date, not just a vague statement “several months before”. Also as another poster indicated, does the police agency in D.C. actually have a Homeland Security Bureau?

    • DC Metropolitan Police Dept does have a Homeland Security Bureau:
      Homeland Security
      300 Indiana Ave., NW
      Room 5050
      Washington, DC 20001
      Phone: (202) 727-9659
      Fax: (202) 727-3896
      Contact: Assistant Chief Jeffery Carroll

    • Plus I have called and the number is legit. I have asked for a call back and have also submitted a FOIA request of my own for the permits issued for March for Our Lives. I don’t know of any document, record, photograph or film that could not be fabricated or faked. We have to render judgments on the basis of how the evidence fits together and its impact on alternative theories of the case. A huge event would require months of prior planning.

  37. Pingback: David Hogg Gives the SDS Clenched Fist Solute – First Modern White Male Mass Shooting – Financing the Leftist Social Agitation – Abel Danger

  38. Pingback: Daily News Links – PropheticTimelines News Hub

  39. Seems to me that until we see a permit application with a date before February 14, there is no story here. All these comments as if a conspiracy has been confirmed with no evidence except an ambiguous claim of “several months”. Show me a permit application with dates BEFORE 2/14/18 and then we have something.

  40. I am sorry that you are so fearful that you have to grasp at feeble things like this. Bullets come out of guns. No one has ever thrown a bullet hard enough to kill anyone. No guns, no people dying from bullets. Capisce?

  41. Pingback: Does This Stunning Email Indicate Parkland Shooting Was Just Another FALSE FLAG Designed To Take Your Guns? – Light has Come

  42. William Yarbrough

    False Flag?

  43. Pingback: Does This Stunning Email Indicate Parkland Shooting was Just Another FALSE FLAG Designed to Take YOUR Guns? - Guns in the News

  44. Pingback: Sobre el Atentado de Parkland: “La Solicitud de Permiso para la Marcha ‘Marzo por Nuestras Vidas’ se presentó Meses antes del Incidente” – por Dr. Eowin – Tiempos de Cambio/Times of Change

  45. It is absolutely certain that an extravaganza like they put together would require significant time to organize and prepare for. Likewise, anyone paying attention would be hard-pressed to claim that this isn’t one of the more contrived events since they began.
    I have absolutely no difficulty of any sort believing that they applied months prior to the trigger event. I have minor questions such as whether or not these applications are public information. I can see no reason for them not to be.
    That said, thank you so much for all of your hard work. I keep hoping there will come a time when people become fed up with the lies and manipulation. It is utterly amazing to me that the writers for these things are so tone deaf as to produce such irritating and unlikely “heroes” for their productions as Mr. Piglet. He and his female Sancho Panza are far too hard on the eyes and ears.

  46. Pingback: Stunning Email Indicates Parkland Shooting Was Just Another FALSE FLAG – Coercion Code – "Dark Times are upon us"

  47. Pingback: FOI Request reveals that March for Our Lives was planned MONTHS in advance… Long before shooting took place | Sheep Media

  48. Pingback: Why the Marjory Stoneman Douglas School Shooting is Another False Flag « Chemtrails: The Exotic Weapon

  49. Thomas E Graham

    This is pure conspiracy.
    Deena Katz filed it on Feb 20th.
    Info about Deena Katz (Women’s march organizer)
    It was fun to believe for a couple minutes but a google search that found the actual document from the National Park Service is all I need to consider this as bunk.

  50. Pingback: Judge Jeanine Interrupts Live Broadcast With Startling Message About What FBI Officials Are Doing Right Now | RedReport

  51. Pingback: Application for 'March For Our Lives' permit was made months before Parkland school shooting | Lucas Daniel Smith's Blog

  52. Pingback: Application for “March For Our Lives” Permit Made Months BEFORE Parkland Shooting | Starship Earth: The Big Picture

  53. I spoke with Scott Earhardt. He indicated to me that this is a fake email. The permit was issued March 13th.

  54. I have the screenshot of his email. I removed cell number but office number is the same. His email back to me reads as follows:
    That is incorrect, permit was issued on March 13th and planning began thereafter.
    Officer Scott C Earhardt
    Metropolitan Police Department
    Homeland Security Bureau
    Planning and Logistics
    2850 New York Ave, NE
    Washington. DC. 20002
    Office: 202-671-6529

    • What, exactly, is “incorrect”? We have an email the authenticity of which is not in doubt in which he describes the PROCESS of acquiring a permit. He states “there was several months of planning for this large event”, which is consistent with the protocols for closing a street in Washington, D.C. It must be initiated at least SIX MONTHS prior to the event. I am asking about when the “Letter of Intent” was submitted. You are reporting when the permit was issued. They are not the same. What you have does not falsify the previous report, which appears to be dated in relation to the Letter of Intent, which had to be submitted months and months prior to issuing the permit for the march.

    • You mean this supposed “email” that Nathan Stolpman had in his YouTube video? — that Nathan Stolpman who was a used-car salesman until he got into the more lucrative business of being a “broadcaster” with his Lift The Veil Productions?
      It doesn’t even look like an email. To start, the date of the email is missing.
      And as Professor Fetzer noted in his response to you, the date of the issuing of the permit is entirely different from the date when the application for the permit was submitted.

      • Here’s another reply, where he claims he confused “March for Our Lives” with “March for Life” on 16 January:
        But he refers to “March for Our Lives” BY NAME AND DATE (24 March) in the original, making this explanation completely indefensible. I am sorry, but Officer Earhardt has now turned into a 2nd rate liar for corrupt politicians.

        • Interesting. I agree to come on his show. I am unaware that he invited me on. Could you send me a link or copy the invitation? Many thanks!

    • I thought you said you spoke to him? Why did he speak to you and send an email both?

  55. Pingback: FOI Request reveals that March for Our Lives was planned MONTHS in advance… Long before shooting took place – I.A.M.

  56. Pingback: Does This Stunning Email Indicate Parkland Shooting Was Just Another FALSE FLAG Designed To Take YOUR Guns? « Socio-Economics History Blog

  57. Pingback: Application for ‘March For Our Lives’ permit was made months before Parkland school shooting | Flurry of Thoughts

  58. I sent him a screenshot of the fake email featured in the article above. I asked him “did you send this email”. He said no.
    Please check with him yourself. The email address in the fake email is correct. Maybe he’s not responding to voicemail but he responded to my email.
    I have sent him the link to this article so that he is aware his name is being used by a conspiracy website.

    • What else did you expect him to say? There is no good reason to doubt the authenticity of the original, which was sent to Ole by a correspondent who has been highly reliable in the past. Neither he nor Ole has an axe to grind; but Officer Earhardt has excellent reasons to deny it: his salary and pension!
      You seem to me to be rather gullible. Just for my information, what is your take on Sandy Hook? the Boston bombing? Las Vegas? Parkland? Tell me a little about yourself so I have a better basis for assessing your credibility. Or don’t. His original coheres with our other evidence, but his denial does not.

    • Officer Scott Earhardt is a grown-up and a professional who needs no intermediary to deliver his messages, certainly not you or Nathan Stolpman and his lucrative one-man Lift The Veil Productions. Let Earhardt come on FOTM and officially deny he had written and sent the March 28, 2018 email to Ole Dammegard’s contact.

    • So where is the copy of his email ?

  59. I actually contacted Earhardt said this is FALSE INFORMATION

  60. Fk book has it so the link here goes to politic fact check bs.

  61. I shared this on my Facebook page and today, i just received a notification from Facebook alerting me to the fact that Politifact has determined it fake news. What is so interesting is that when I shared it, my personal message was to look at all evidence on all things before coming to any determination of truth. I think Facebook has gone above and beyond in determining credibility of user posts and shares. I especially think so when my remarks about the post also quesrioned its credibility. Was Facebook censoring you or me? I conclude they must have an algorithm that flags stuff and no human actually reads it for context. Keep up the good work. I trust you more than I do Facebook!

  62. Pingback: Florida Obituaries Show No Parkland School Shooting Deaths | ― ஜ ۩ Whiskey Tango Texas ۩ ஜ ―

  63. I believe this guy is the exact person who would answer that email. I’ve gotten a permit for a protest through him and I will say that it does take several months, faxes and exchanging of emails and snail mail to get approved. You have to comply with several different people like park security and the police down there. it’s crazy extensive. These kids had experienced help planning this protest. I don’t believe for one minute they did it on their own.

    • “Every Town for Gun Safety” is stated as the original organizer for this March. I don’t watch very much tv but never had the impression it was the kids who organized this. I recall only hearing about the three of them sometime after when they gave their speaches.
      A major event in Washington planned for six months during all the gun control buzz would have advertised for a while, Everytown for gun Safety and March for our Lives don’t ring bells but promotion was likely of former school shootings.
      The article from Wiki and this post stated the kids formed their group Never Again MSD the day after the shooting, and collaborated with organizers for March for our Lives during the final month of planning.
      So either the kids social media group was approached by Everytown or Everytown suggested to kids that were interviewed to form the promotion company and then be the new representation, idk.

      • Crap. Should read more before answering and now it’s being reviewed and I can’t delete lol.
        But yeah ignore all except Everytown for gun Safety pulled the permit so im curious what plans were before this tragedy. Guessing some celeb got bumped lol

  64. I believe maybe there was some confusion. There was a permit months earlier for ‘March for Life’ march in DC

  65. Pingback: Florida Obituaries show no Parkland school shooting deaths | Light On Conspiracies - Revealing the Agenda

  66. Pingback: The curious ever-changing dates of March For Our Lives permit application | The Olive Branch Report

  67. Pingback: The curious ever-changing dates of March For Our Lives permit application | Light On Conspiracies - Revealing the Agenda

  68. Pingback: Innocent Email Throws #NeverAgain Narrative Into Question | peoples trust toronto

  69. Pingback: Innocent Email Throws #NeverAgain Narrative Into Question – No Comment Diary

  70. Pingback: Deep State Florida School Shooting Links to #PedoGate & Gun Confiscation

  71. Wow is all I can say; except thank you…and please be wary in your search for fact. We the People wait cautiously

  72. Pingback: Stunning Email Proves Parkland Shooting False Flag for Gun Control 4/08/2018 | saintandrewstwinflame

  73. Pingback: Web Research Links for the Week of 4/2/18 «

  74. This story is completely bogus, Snopes has already debunked it:

  75. I used to think that the so called Sandy Hook School SHOOTING Was THE BIGGEST HOAX FOISTED UPON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, BUT NOW COMES PARKLAND…..Bad Enough that the FBI and COWARDLY SHERIFFS DID NOTHING….BUT IF INDEED THE WASHINGTON March For Our Lives Event was applied for Months in advance tells Us This SCHOOL SHOOTING WAS PLANNED!!! Common Sense Tells Us it HAD TO BE. I am the Parade Marshall For a small town in Alaska, A One Hour Parade has to be PERMITTED by the State of alaska and Takes weeks of Advance Preparation, not to mention the paperwork….Like you SAID…..FOR WASHINGTON D.C., PROBABLY 6 MONTHS….IS THAT A SMOKING GUN???

    • was blown apart by Sterling Harwood, J.D., Ph.D., in my books on Sandy Hook and the moon landing at Check ’em out. For those who are not up-to-speed on Parkland, here’s a recent review:
      “The Parkland Puzzle: How the Pieces fit Together”!/v/monaalexis27/lvkflnbp
      For an expose of 10-12 cases (with multiple proofs), check this out, too:
      “How to Spot a False Flag”
      And for some cases that are in certain respects equally disturbing, see:
      “Fake News: Issues of Identity”

    • The biggest hoax BY FAR was 9/11. There were so many others that it is difficult to rate them. Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon, Pulse Orlando are all contenders, as far as U.S. hoaxes go.

  76. Pingback: March For Our Lives Protest was Approved by DC Police Months Before the Shooting by the Same Organizers as the Women's March ⋆ Unite or Die

  77. Pingback: David Hogg Gives the SDS Clenched Fist Salute – First Modern White Male Mass Shooting – Financing the Leftist Social Agitation – Abel Danger

  78. Pingback: gowld comments on "The new Google News: AI meets human intelligence"

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.