Agenda 21- David vs Goliath Test Case?

High court agrees to decide, case goes to the supremes this october


The Backstory:  Priest Lake Couple Battles The EPA Over Property Rights

PRIEST LAKE, Idaho – In November of 2007 officials from the Environmental Protection Agency told Mike and Chantelle Sackett they violated the Clean Water Act by filling in their Priest Lake property without first obtaining a permit because their property is on a federal wetland. The EPA issued a compliance order requiring the Sacketts to remove the fill material and restore the land to its original condition. The Sacketts say they were completely blind sided.

“I started going around and trying to do some background work,” said Chantelle Sackett. “And I figured out there is nothing disclosed anywhere that it is a wetlands, except what they say that it’s in a wetland inventory.”

The Sacketts don’t think the EPA has proper jurisdiction over their property and would like to state their case to the EPA as to why their property shouldn’t be considered a wetland. They filed a lawsuit against the EPA to force them to hear their case in court. In September the Ninth Circuit Court ruled in favor of the EPA citing that the Clean Water Act doesn’t require the EPA to give judicial review on their compliance orders.

“It’s like these people are ego-driven to make a point of like we have control of your property, you can’t do anything with it,” said Mike Sackett.

The Sacketts could file for a permit that would cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars. They say that would cost more than the land is worth. Now they are stuck with a piece of land that they can’t do anything with and continue to rack up thousands of dollars in fines as they try to fight a legal battle with the federal government.

“They’re taking advantage of a situation. You get bullied in and have no control,” said Mike Sackett.

EPA officials have been unable to be contacted to comment on this story. The Sacketts are now appealing the ninth circuit court’s decision. They say they will fight this all the way to the Supreme Court to get their voice heard.

Please follow and like us:

Share and Enjoy !

0 0
Notify of
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
9 years ago

f they thought they would get an objective fair hearing and decision from the “9th Circus Court of Appeals”, they we were mistaken. I feel for them, and it angers me that the EPA, and their affiliate organizations can make rules as they go along. If this was wetlands, it should never have been allowed to be sold without disclosure. This should have been public domain information in an apparent way, so that anyone could see. All accompaying documentation on the property, including exclusions and any restrictions should have been available with the description of this property. Peoplewe have to… Read more »